Brookfield Finance Inc. 4.625%

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, V has a market cap of 709.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while V trades at $365.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas V's P/E ratio is 36.81. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to V's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is more volatile compared to V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, MA has a market cap of 524.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while MA trades at $581.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MA's P/E ratio is 40.72. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MA's ROE of +1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is more volatile compared to MA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, AXP has a market cap of 208.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while AXP trades at $297.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AXP's P/E ratio is 20.77. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AXP's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is more volatile compared to AXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, COF has a market cap of 125.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while COF trades at $195.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COF's P/E ratio is 16.44. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to COF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is more volatile compared to COF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, COF-PK has a market cap of 121.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while COF-PK trades at $17.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COF-PK's P/E ratio is 0.67. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to COF-PK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is more volatile compared to COF-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, COF-PI has a market cap of 121B. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while COF-PI trades at $18.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COF-PI's P/E ratio is 0.73. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to COF-PI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is more volatile compared to COF-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, COF-PN has a market cap of 120.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while COF-PN trades at $16.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COF-PN's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to COF-PN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is more volatile compared to COF-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, COF-PJ has a market cap of 120.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while COF-PJ trades at $17.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COF-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.69. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to COF-PJ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is more volatile compared to COF-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, COF-PL has a market cap of 120.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while COF-PL trades at $16.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COF-PL's P/E ratio is 0.64. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to COF-PL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is more volatile compared to COF-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, PYPL has a market cap of 69.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while PYPL trades at $71.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PYPL's P/E ratio is 16.03. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PYPL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is more volatile compared to PYPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, DFS has a market cap of 50.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while DFS trades at $200.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFS's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DFS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is more volatile compared to DFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, SYF has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while SYF trades at $59.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SYF's P/E ratio is 8.08. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SYF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is more volatile compared to SYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, KKRS has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while KKRS trades at $17.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KKRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KKRS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is more volatile compared to KKRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, SOFI has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while SOFI trades at $13.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOFI's P/E ratio is 31.78. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SOFI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is more volatile compared to SOFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, ALLY has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while ALLY trades at $35.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALLY's P/E ratio is 59.45. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ALLY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is less volatile compared to ALLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, AGM-PC has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while AGM-PC trades at $348.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGM-PC's P/E ratio is 31.38. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AGM-PC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is less volatile compared to AGM-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, SYF-PB has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while SYF-PB trades at $24.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SYF-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SYF-PB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is more volatile compared to SYF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, OBDC has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while OBDC trades at $14.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OBDC's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OBDC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is more volatile compared to OBDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, SYF-PA has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while SYF-PA trades at $18.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SYF-PA's P/E ratio is 2.46. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SYF-PA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is more volatile compared to SYF-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, SLMBP has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while SLMBP trades at $79.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLMBP's P/E ratio is 37.12. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SLMBP's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is less volatile compared to SLMBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, SLM has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while SLM trades at $32.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLM's P/E ratio is 11.44. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SLM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is more volatile compared to SLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, OMF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while OMF trades at $52.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OMF's P/E ratio is 11.09. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OMF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is less volatile compared to OMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, CGABL has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while CGABL trades at $16.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGABL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CGABL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is more volatile compared to CGABL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, CACC has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while CACC trades at $488.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CACC's P/E ratio is 20.81. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CACC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is less volatile compared to CACC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, FCFS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while FCFS trades at $126.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCFS's P/E ratio is 20.25. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FCFS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is more volatile compared to FCFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, ORCC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while ORCC trades at $13.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORCC's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ORCC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is more volatile compared to ORCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, JSM has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while JSM trades at $18.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JSM's P/E ratio is 15.25. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JSM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is more volatile compared to JSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, IX has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while IX trades at $21.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IX's P/E ratio is 10.08. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is more volatile compared to IX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, UPST has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while UPST trades at $50.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UPST's P/E ratio is -69.84. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to UPST's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is less volatile compared to UPST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, NNI has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while NNI trades at $116.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NNI's P/E ratio is 21.92. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NNI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is more volatile compared to NNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, SEZL has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while SEZL trades at $114.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEZL's P/E ratio is 38.40. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SEZL's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is less volatile compared to SEZL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, WU has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while WU trades at $9.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WU's P/E ratio is 3.50. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WU's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is less volatile compared to WU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, ADS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while ADS trades at $56.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADS's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ADS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is more volatile compared to ADS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, QFIN has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while QFIN trades at $40.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QFIN's P/E ratio is 6.29. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to QFIN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is less volatile compared to QFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, BFH has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while BFH trades at $52.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BFH's P/E ratio is 9.18. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BFH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is less volatile compared to BFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, ENVA has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while ENVA trades at $94.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENVA's P/E ratio is 11.09. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ENVA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is more volatile compared to ENVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, FINV has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while FINV trades at $8.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FINV's P/E ratio is 6.10. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FINV's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is more volatile compared to FINV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, AGM has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while AGM trades at $188.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGM's P/E ratio is 11.64. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AGM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is less volatile compared to AGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, AGM-PG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while AGM-PG trades at $18.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGM-PG's P/E ratio is 1.62. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AGM-PG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is more volatile compared to AGM-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, AGM-PD has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while AGM-PD trades at $20.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGM-PD's P/E ratio is 1.89. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AGM-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is more volatile compared to AGM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, AGM-PE has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while AGM-PE trades at $21.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGM-PE's P/E ratio is 1.92. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AGM-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is more volatile compared to AGM-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, AGM-PF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while AGM-PF trades at $19.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGM-PF's P/E ratio is 1.74. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AGM-PF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is more volatile compared to AGM-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, AGM-A has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while AGM-A trades at $133.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGM-A's P/E ratio is 8.23. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AGM-A's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is more volatile compared to AGM-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, NAVI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while NAVI trades at $13.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NAVI's P/E ratio is 25.96. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NAVI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is less volatile compared to NAVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, OCSL has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while OCSL trades at $14.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OCSL's P/E ratio is 120.83. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OCSL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is more volatile compared to OCSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, LU has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while LU trades at $2.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LU's P/E ratio is -3.78. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LU's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is less volatile compared to LU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, LC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while LC trades at $10.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LC's P/E ratio is 23.77. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is less volatile compared to LC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, MGI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while MGI trades at $10.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGI's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MGI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is more volatile compared to MGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, BBDC has a market cap of 976.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while BBDC trades at $9.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBDC's P/E ratio is 9.87. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BBDC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is more volatile compared to BBDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, WRLD has a market cap of 834.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while WRLD trades at $157.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRLD's P/E ratio is 9.65. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WRLD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is more volatile compared to WRLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, NRDS has a market cap of 805.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while NRDS trades at $10.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NRDS's P/E ratio is 29.19. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NRDS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is less volatile compared to NRDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, ATLC has a market cap of 756.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while ATLC trades at $50.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATLC's P/E ratio is 9.68. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ATLC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is more volatile compared to ATLC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, ATLCZ has a market cap of 738.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while ATLCZ trades at $25.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATLCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ATLCZ's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is more volatile compared to ATLCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, ATLCL has a market cap of 732.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while ATLCL trades at $23.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATLCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ATLCL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is more volatile compared to ATLCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, EZPW has a market cap of 731.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while EZPW trades at $13.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EZPW's P/E ratio is 11.18. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EZPW's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is less volatile compared to EZPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, LX has a market cap of 594.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while LX trades at $7.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LX's P/E ratio is 6.61. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is less volatile compared to LX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, PRAA has a market cap of 571.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while PRAA trades at $14.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRAA's P/E ratio is 8.06. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PRAA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is less volatile compared to PRAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, GDOT has a market cap of 529.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while GDOT trades at $9.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDOT's P/E ratio is -80.42. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GDOT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is less volatile compared to GDOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, QD has a market cap of 491.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while QD trades at $2.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QD's P/E ratio is 12.40. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to QD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is more volatile compared to QD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, RWAYL has a market cap of 371.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while RWAYL trades at $25.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RWAYL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RWAYL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is more volatile compared to RWAYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, RWAYZ has a market cap of 369.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while RWAYZ trades at $25.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RWAYZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RWAYZ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is more volatile compared to RWAYZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, RWAY has a market cap of 362.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while RWAY trades at $9.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RWAY's P/E ratio is 5.91. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RWAY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is more volatile compared to RWAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, ATLCP has a market cap of 342.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while ATLCP trades at $22.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATLCP's P/E ratio is 2.98. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ATLCP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is more volatile compared to ATLCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, OPRT has a market cap of 292.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while OPRT trades at $6.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OPRT's P/E ratio is -6.29. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OPRT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is less volatile compared to OPRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, NEWTI has a market cap of 281.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while NEWTI trades at $25.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEWTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NEWTI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is more volatile compared to NEWTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, YRD has a market cap of 270.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while YRD trades at $6.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YRD's P/E ratio is 2.49. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to YRD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is more volatile compared to YRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, RM has a market cap of 265.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while RM trades at $26.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RM's P/E ratio is 8.16. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is more volatile compared to RM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, PMTS has a market cap of 258.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while PMTS trades at $22.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMTS's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PMTS's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is less volatile compared to PMTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, FOA has a market cap of 234.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while FOA trades at $21.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FOA's P/E ratio is 4.72. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FOA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is more volatile compared to FOA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, MFIN has a market cap of 218M. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while MFIN trades at $9.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MFIN's P/E ratio is 5.86. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MFIN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is more volatile compared to MFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, LPRO has a market cap of 211.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while LPRO trades at $1.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LPRO's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LPRO's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is less volatile compared to LPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, CPSS has a market cap of 200.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while CPSS trades at $9.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPSS's P/E ratio is 11.76. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CPSS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is more volatile compared to CPSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, SUNL has a market cap of 146.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while SUNL trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUNL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SUNL's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is less volatile compared to SUNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, XYF has a market cap of 138.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while XYF trades at $18.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XYF's P/E ratio is 3.87. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to XYF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is less volatile compared to XYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, AHG has a market cap of 110.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while AHG trades at $1.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AHG's P/E ratio is -17.25. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AHG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is less volatile compared to AHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, ELVT has a market cap of 58.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while ELVT trades at $1.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELVT's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ELVT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is more volatile compared to ELVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, NICK has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while NICK trades at $6.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NICK's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NICK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is more volatile compared to NICK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, OMCC has a market cap of 36M. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while OMCC trades at $5.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OMCC's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OMCC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is less volatile compared to OMCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, CURR has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while CURR trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CURR's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CURR's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is less volatile compared to CURR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, NISN has a market cap of 19.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while NISN trades at $4.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NISN's P/E ratio is 18.22. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NISN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is less volatile compared to NISN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, JT has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while JT trades at $0.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JT's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is less volatile compared to JT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, MCVT has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while MCVT trades at $1.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCVT's P/E ratio is 9.70. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MCVT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is less volatile compared to MCVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, LMFA has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while LMFA trades at $1.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LMFA's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LMFA's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is less volatile compared to LMFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, AIHS has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while AIHS trades at $0.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIHS's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AIHS's ROE of +129.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is less volatile compared to AIHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, SNTG has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while SNTG trades at $1.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNTG's P/E ratio is -1.99. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SNTG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is more volatile compared to SNTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, CURO has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while CURO trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CURO's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CURO's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is less volatile compared to CURO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, PT has a market cap of 389.4K. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while PT trades at $0.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PT's P/E ratio is -6.31. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is less volatile compared to PT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, DXF has a market cap of 3K. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while DXF trades at $6.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DXF's ROE of -22.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is less volatile compared to DXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, IPB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while IPB trades at $25.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IPB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is more volatile compared to IPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, GJT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while GJT trades at $22.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GJT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GJT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is more volatile compared to GJT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, KTN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while KTN trades at $26.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KTN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is more volatile compared to KTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, PYT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while PYT trades at $22.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PYT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PYT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is more volatile compared to PYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, GJO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while GJO trades at $25.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GJO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GJO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is more volatile compared to GJO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, WEI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while WEI trades at $0.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WEI's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WEI's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is less volatile compared to WEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, AEFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while AEFC trades at $19.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AEFC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is more volatile compared to AEFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, SOFIW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while SOFIW trades at $5.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOFIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SOFIW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is less volatile compared to SOFIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, GJP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while GJP trades at $24.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GJP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GJP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is more volatile compared to GJP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, NRUC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while NRUC trades at $23.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NRUC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NRUC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is more volatile compared to NRUC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.

BNH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BNH stands at 92.4B. In comparison, SC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BNH is priced at $15.64, while SC trades at $41.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BNH currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SC's P/E ratio is 4.13. In terms of profitability, BNH's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BNH is more volatile compared to SC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNH.