Brand Engagement Network, Inc.
Brand Engagement Network, Inc. (BNAIW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BNAIW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BNAIW | $0.02 | -19.50% | 11M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| MSFT | $524.94 | +0.56% | 3.9T | 38.29 | $13.63 | +0.62% |
| ORCL | $256.43 | +2.55% | 710B | 58.11 | $4.35 | +0.71% |
| PLTR | $179.54 | -3.97% | 413.4B | 608.93 | $0.30 | N/A |
| ADBE | $345.62 | +1.34% | 141.5B | 21.36 | $15.62 | N/A |
| SNPS | $625.88 | +1.04% | 114B | 71.06 | $8.67 | N/A |
| PANW | $172.89 | +3.49% | 112.2B | 96.65 | $1.74 | N/A |
| CRWD | $451.69 | +6.41% | 106.3B | -627.10 | -$0.68 | N/A |
| HOOD | $105.65 | -7.83% | 100.9B | 57.68 | $1.97 | N/A |
| NET | $215.53 | +5.34% | 70B | -574.29 | -$0.35 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
BNAIW vs MSFT Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, MSFT has a market cap of 3.9T. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while MSFT trades at $524.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSFT's P/E ratio is 38.29. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to MSFT's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to MSFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check MSFT's competition here
BNAIW vs ORCL Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, ORCL has a market cap of 710B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while ORCL trades at $256.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORCL's P/E ratio is 58.11. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to ORCL's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to ORCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check ORCL's competition here
BNAIW vs PLTR Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, PLTR has a market cap of 413.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while PLTR trades at $179.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLTR's P/E ratio is 608.93. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to PLTR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to PLTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check PLTR's competition here
BNAIW vs ADBE Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 141.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while ADBE trades at $345.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 21.36. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check ADBE's competition here
BNAIW vs SNPS Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, SNPS has a market cap of 114B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while SNPS trades at $625.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNPS's P/E ratio is 71.06. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to SNPS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to SNPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check SNPS's competition here
BNAIW vs PANW Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, PANW has a market cap of 112.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while PANW trades at $172.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PANW's P/E ratio is 96.65. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to PANW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to PANW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check PANW's competition here
BNAIW vs CRWD Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, CRWD has a market cap of 106.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while CRWD trades at $451.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRWD's P/E ratio is -627.10. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to CRWD's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to CRWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check CRWD's competition here
BNAIW vs HOOD Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, HOOD has a market cap of 100.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while HOOD trades at $105.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HOOD's P/E ratio is 57.68. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to HOOD's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to HOOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check HOOD's competition here
BNAIW vs NET Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, NET has a market cap of 70B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while NET trades at $215.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NET's P/E ratio is -574.29. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to NET's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to NET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check NET's competition here
BNAIW vs CRWV Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, CRWV has a market cap of 68.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while CRWV trades at $110.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRWV's P/E ratio is -55.25. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to CRWV's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to CRWV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check CRWV's competition here
BNAIW vs VMW Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, VMW has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while VMW trades at $142.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VMW's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to VMW's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to VMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check VMW's competition here
BNAIW vs FTNT Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, FTNT has a market cap of 57.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while FTNT trades at $96.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTNT's P/E ratio is 29.71. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to FTNT's ROE of +1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to FTNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check FTNT's competition here
BNAIW vs SQ Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, SQ has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while SQ trades at $83.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SQ's P/E ratio is 49.98. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to SQ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to SQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check SQ's competition here
BNAIW vs XYZ Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, XYZ has a market cap of 44.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while XYZ trades at $76.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XYZ's P/E ratio is 15.61. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to XYZ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to XYZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check XYZ's competition here
BNAIW vs ZS Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, ZS has a market cap of 42.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while ZS trades at $289.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZS's P/E ratio is -1004.37. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to ZS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to ZS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check ZS's competition here
BNAIW vs NETE Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, NETE has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while NETE trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NETE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to NETE's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to NETE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check NETE's competition here
BNAIW vs SPLK Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, SPLK has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while SPLK trades at $156.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPLK's P/E ratio is 103.22. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to SPLK's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to SPLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check SPLK's competition here
BNAIW vs TOST Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, TOST has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while TOST trades at $45.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOST's P/E ratio is 110.97. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to TOST's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to TOST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check TOST's competition here
BNAIW vs VRSN Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, VRSN has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while VRSN trades at $273.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRSN's P/E ratio is 31.95. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to VRSN's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to VRSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check VRSN's competition here
BNAIW vs AFRM Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, AFRM has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while AFRM trades at $77.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFRM's P/E ratio is -384.05. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to AFRM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to AFRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check AFRM's competition here
BNAIW vs FLT Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, FLT has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while FLT trades at $303.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLT's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to FLT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to FLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check FLT's competition here
BNAIW vs CPAY Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, CPAY has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while CPAY trades at $315.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPAY's P/E ratio is 20.64. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to CPAY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to CPAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check CPAY's competition here
BNAIW vs CYBR Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, CYBR has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while CYBR trades at $413.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYBR's P/E ratio is -112.88. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to CYBR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to CYBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check CYBR's competition here
BNAIW vs CHKP Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, CHKP has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while CHKP trades at $188.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHKP's P/E ratio is 23.59. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to CHKP's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to CHKP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check CHKP's competition here
BNAIW vs GDDY Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, GDDY has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while GDDY trades at $154.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDDY's P/E ratio is 24.23. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to GDDY's ROE of +1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to GDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check GDDY's competition here
BNAIW vs GEN Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, GEN has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while GEN trades at $28.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEN's P/E ratio is 32.05. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to GEN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to GEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check GEN's competition here
BNAIW vs IOT Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, IOT has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while IOT trades at $36.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IOT's P/E ratio is -147.68. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to IOT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to IOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check IOT's competition here
BNAIW vs NTNX Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, NTNX has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while NTNX trades at $75.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTNX's P/E ratio is -264.58. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to NTNX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to NTNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check NTNX's competition here
BNAIW vs FFIV Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, FFIV has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while FFIV trades at $321.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFIV's P/E ratio is 28.08. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to FFIV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to FFIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check FFIV's competition here
BNAIW vs KSPI Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, KSPI has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while KSPI trades at $88.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KSPI's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to KSPI's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to KSPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check KSPI's competition here
BNAIW vs RBRK Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, RBRK has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while RBRK trades at $91.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RBRK's P/E ratio is 24.69. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to RBRK's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to RBRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check RBRK's competition here
BNAIW vs MDB Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, MDB has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while MDB trades at $235.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDB's P/E ratio is -184.48. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to MDB's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to MDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check MDB's competition here
BNAIW vs OKTA Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, OKTA has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while OKTA trades at $97.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OKTA's P/E ratio is 136.17. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to OKTA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to OKTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check OKTA's competition here
BNAIW vs NLOK Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, NLOK has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while NLOK trades at $21.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NLOK's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to NLOK's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to NLOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check NLOK's competition here
BNAIW vs AKAM Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, AKAM has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while AKAM trades at $74.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AKAM's P/E ratio is 24.95. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to AKAM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to AKAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check AKAM's competition here
BNAIW vs SAIL Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, SAIL has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while SAIL trades at $20.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAIL's P/E ratio is -11.25. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to SAIL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to SAIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check SAIL's competition here
BNAIW vs ALTR Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, ALTR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while ALTR trades at $111.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALTR's P/E ratio is 699.06. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to ALTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW and ALTR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ALTR's competition here
BNAIW vs DOX Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, DOX has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while DOX trades at $84.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DOX's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to DOX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to DOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check DOX's competition here
BNAIW vs PLAN Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, PLAN has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while PLAN trades at $63.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLAN's P/E ratio is -44.82. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to PLAN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to PLAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check PLAN's competition here
BNAIW vs INFA Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, INFA has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while INFA trades at $24.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INFA's P/E ratio is -823.00. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to INFA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to INFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check INFA's competition here
BNAIW vs KVYO Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, KVYO has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while KVYO trades at $35.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KVYO's P/E ratio is -125.22. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to KVYO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to KVYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check KVYO's competition here
BNAIW vs DBX Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, DBX has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while DBX trades at $26.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBX's P/E ratio is 16.48. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to DBX's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to DBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check DBX's competition here
BNAIW vs FOUR Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, FOUR has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while FOUR trades at $82.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FOUR's P/E ratio is 31.20. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to FOUR's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to FOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check FOUR's competition here
BNAIW vs HCP Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, HCP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while HCP trades at $34.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HCP's P/E ratio is -57.97. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to HCP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to HCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check HCP's competition here
BNAIW vs JCOM Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, JCOM has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while JCOM trades at $142.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JCOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to JCOM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to JCOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check JCOM's competition here
BNAIW vs SQSP Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, SQSP has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while SQSP trades at $46.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SQSP's P/E ratio is -1164.25. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to SQSP's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to SQSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check SQSP's competition here
BNAIW vs WIX Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, WIX has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while WIX trades at $128.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WIX's P/E ratio is 40.79. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to WIX's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to WIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check WIX's competition here
BNAIW vs NEWR Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, NEWR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while NEWR trades at $86.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEWR's P/E ratio is -41.62. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to NEWR's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to NEWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check NEWR's competition here
BNAIW vs VRNS Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, VRNS has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while VRNS trades at $55.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRNS's P/E ratio is -59.12. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to VRNS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to VRNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check VRNS's competition here
BNAIW vs CCCS Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, CCCS has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while CCCS trades at $9.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCCS's P/E ratio is 923.00. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to CCCS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to CCCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check CCCS's competition here
BNAIW vs WEX Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, WEX has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while WEX trades at $171.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WEX's P/E ratio is 21.12. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to WEX's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to WEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check WEX's competition here
BNAIW vs PATH Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, PATH has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while PATH trades at $11.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PATH's P/E ratio is -87.04. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to PATH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to PATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check PATH's competition here
BNAIW vs CFLT Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, CFLT has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while CFLT trades at $17.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CFLT's P/E ratio is -17.11. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to CFLT's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to CFLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check CFLT's competition here
BNAIW vs S Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, S has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while S trades at $17.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas S's P/E ratio is -11.98. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to S's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to S. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check S's competition here
BNAIW vs NVEI Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, NVEI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while NVEI trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVEI's P/E ratio is 212.44. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to NVEI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW and NVEI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NVEI's competition here
BNAIW vs QLYS Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, QLYS has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while QLYS trades at $130.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QLYS's P/E ratio is 25.48. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to QLYS's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to QLYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check QLYS's competition here
BNAIW vs ACIW Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, ACIW has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while ACIW trades at $42.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACIW's P/E ratio is 18.81. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to ACIW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to ACIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check ACIW's competition here
BNAIW vs BOX Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while BOX trades at $31.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 23.88. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to BOX's ROE of +1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to BOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check BOX's competition here
BNAIW vs CORZ Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, CORZ has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while CORZ trades at $14.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CORZ's P/E ratio is -3.71. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to CORZ's ROE of +1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to CORZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check CORZ's competition here
BNAIW vs CORZZ Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, CORZZ has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while CORZZ trades at $14.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CORZZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to CORZZ's ROE of +1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to CORZZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check CORZZ's competition here
BNAIW vs SPSC Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, SPSC has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while SPSC trades at $110.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPSC's P/E ratio is 48.01. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to SPSC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to SPSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check SPSC's competition here
BNAIW vs RELY Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, RELY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while RELY trades at $16.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RELY's P/E ratio is 316.67. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to RELY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to RELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check RELY's competition here
BNAIW vs ESMT Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, ESMT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while ESMT trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESMT's P/E ratio is 153.67. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to ESMT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to ESMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check ESMT's competition here
BNAIW vs EEFT Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, EEFT has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while EEFT trades at $92.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EEFT's P/E ratio is 12.78. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to EEFT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to EEFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check EEFT's competition here
BNAIW vs STNE Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, STNE has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while STNE trades at $13.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STNE's P/E ratio is -20.43. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to STNE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to STNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check STNE's competition here
BNAIW vs TENB Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, TENB has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while TENB trades at $30.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TENB's P/E ratio is -77.24. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to TENB's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to TENB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check TENB's competition here
BNAIW vs ODD Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, ODD has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while ODD trades at $57.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ODD's P/E ratio is 32.50. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to ODD's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to ODD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check ODD's competition here
BNAIW vs CLBT Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, CLBT has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while CLBT trades at $13.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLBT's P/E ratio is -14.70. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to CLBT's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to CLBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check CLBT's competition here
BNAIW vs SWI Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, SWI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while SWI trades at $18.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWI's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to SWI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to SWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check SWI's competition here
BNAIW vs AVPT Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, AVPT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while AVPT trades at $17.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVPT's P/E ratio is -113.23. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to AVPT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to AVPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check AVPT's competition here
BNAIW vs DLO Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, DLO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while DLO trades at $10.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DLO's P/E ratio is 22.19. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to DLO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to DLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check DLO's competition here
BNAIW vs EVOP Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, EVOP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while EVOP trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVOP's P/E ratio is -309.00. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to EVOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to EVOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check EVOP's competition here
BNAIW vs PAGS Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, PAGS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while PAGS trades at $8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAGS's P/E ratio is 6.83. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to PAGS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to PAGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check PAGS's competition here
BNAIW vs MQ Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, MQ has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while MQ trades at $5.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MQ's P/E ratio is -49.08. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to MQ's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to MQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check MQ's competition here
BNAIW vs DOCN Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, DOCN has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while DOCN trades at $36.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DOCN's P/E ratio is 22.55. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to DOCN's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to DOCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check DOCN's competition here
BNAIW vs CORZW Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, CORZW has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while CORZW trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CORZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to CORZW's ROE of +1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to CORZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check CORZW's competition here
BNAIW vs WRD Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, WRD has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while WRD trades at $8.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRD's P/E ratio is -7.39. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to WRD's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to WRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check WRD's competition here
BNAIW vs PAYO Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, PAYO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while PAYO trades at $7.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAYO's P/E ratio is 26.52. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to PAYO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to PAYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check PAYO's competition here
BNAIW vs EVTC Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, EVTC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while EVTC trades at $35.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVTC's P/E ratio is 16.71. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to EVTC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to EVTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check EVTC's competition here
BNAIW vs BB Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, BB has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while BB trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BB's P/E ratio is 179.50. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to BB's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to BB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check BB's competition here
BNAIW vs PGY Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, PGY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while PGY trades at $31.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PGY's P/E ratio is -7.10. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to PGY's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to PGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check PGY's competition here
BNAIW vs GETVV Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, GETVV has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while GETVV trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GETVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to GETVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to GETVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check GETVV's competition here
BNAIW vs APPN Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, APPN has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while APPN trades at $26.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APPN's P/E ratio is -120.87. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to APPN's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to APPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check APPN's competition here
BNAIW vs AVDX Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, AVDX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while AVDX trades at $9.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVDX's P/E ratio is -246.50. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to AVDX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to AVDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check AVDX's competition here
BNAIW vs PGYWW Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, PGYWW has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while PGYWW trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PGYWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to PGYWW's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to PGYWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check PGYWW's competition here
BNAIW vs FORG Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, FORG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while FORG trades at $23.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FORG's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to FORG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to FORG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check FORG's competition here
BNAIW vs TDC Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, TDC has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while TDC trades at $21.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDC's P/E ratio is 17.85. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to TDC's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to TDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check TDC's competition here
BNAIW vs EVCM Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, EVCM has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while EVCM trades at $10.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVCM's P/E ratio is -131.12. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to EVCM's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to EVCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check EVCM's competition here
BNAIW vs GSKY Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, GSKY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while GSKY trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSKY's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to GSKY's ROE of +5.47%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to GSKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check GSKY's competition here
BNAIW vs FIVN Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, FIVN has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while FIVN trades at $25.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIVN's P/E ratio is 200.42. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to FIVN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to FIVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check FIVN's competition here
BNAIW vs CSGS Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, CSGS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while CSGS trades at $62.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSGS's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to CSGS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to CSGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check CSGS's competition here
BNAIW vs GET Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, GET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while GET trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GET's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to GET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to GET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check GET's competition here
BNAIW vs RAMP Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, RAMP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while RAMP trades at $32.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RAMP's P/E ratio is 135.47. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to RAMP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to RAMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check RAMP's competition here
BNAIW vs STER Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, STER has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while STER trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STER's P/E ratio is -98.47. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to STER's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to STER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check STER's competition here
BNAIW vs NTCT Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, NTCT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while NTCT trades at $21.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTCT's P/E ratio is 21.29. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to NTCT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to NTCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check NTCT's competition here
BNAIW vs TUYA Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, TUYA has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while TUYA trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TUYA's P/E ratio is 62.12. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to TUYA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to TUYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check TUYA's competition here
BNAIW vs ZUO Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, ZUO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while ZUO trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZUO's P/E ratio is -19.65. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to ZUO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to ZUO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check ZUO's competition here
BNAIW vs SUMO Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, SUMO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while SUMO trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUMO's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to SUMO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to SUMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check SUMO's competition here
BNAIW vs GB Comparison August 2025
BNAIW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNAIW stands at 11M. In comparison, GB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BNAIW is priced at $0.02, while GB trades at $7.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNAIW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GB's P/E ratio is 18.23. In terms of profitability, BNAIW's ROE is -1.98%, compared to GB's ROE of +0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, BNAIW is less volatile compared to GB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNAIW.Check GB's competition here