Senmiao Technology Limited
Senmiao Technology Limited AIHS Peers
See (AIHS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Credit Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AIHS | $0.92 | +1.10% | 9.7M | -2.63 | -$0.35 | N/A |
| V | $368.10 | +0.61% | 713.8B | 37.03 | $9.94 | +0.62% |
| MA | $583.86 | +0.32% | 526.2B | 40.94 | $14.26 | +0.49% |
| AXP | $295.89 | -0.50% | 207.3B | 20.65 | $14.33 | +0.99% |
| COF | $192.88 | -1.41% | 123.5B | 16.19 | $11.91 | +1.24% |
| COF-PK | $17.25 | +0.70% | 123.4B | 0.67 | $25.57 | +1.24% |
| COF-PN | $16.31 | +0.68% | 123.4B | 0.64 | $25.57 | +1.24% |
| COF-PL | $16.36 | +0.49% | 123.2B | 0.64 | $25.57 | +1.24% |
| COF-PJ | $17.81 | +0.45% | 123.1B | 0.70 | $25.57 | +1.24% |
| COF-PI | $18.81 | +0.32% | 123B | 0.74 | $25.57 | +1.24% |
Stock Comparison
AIHS vs V Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, V has a market cap of 713.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while V trades at $368.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas V's P/E ratio is 37.03. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to V's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs MA Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, MA has a market cap of 526.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while MA trades at $583.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas MA's P/E ratio is 40.94. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to MA's ROE of +1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to MA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs AXP Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, AXP has a market cap of 207.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while AXP trades at $295.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas AXP's P/E ratio is 20.65. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to AXP's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to AXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs COF Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, COF has a market cap of 123.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while COF trades at $192.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas COF's P/E ratio is 16.19. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to COF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to COF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs COF-PK Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, COF-PK has a market cap of 123.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while COF-PK trades at $17.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas COF-PK's P/E ratio is 0.67. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to COF-PK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to COF-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs COF-PN Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, COF-PN has a market cap of 123.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while COF-PN trades at $16.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas COF-PN's P/E ratio is 0.64. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to COF-PN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to COF-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs COF-PL Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, COF-PL has a market cap of 123.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while COF-PL trades at $16.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas COF-PL's P/E ratio is 0.64. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to COF-PL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to COF-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs COF-PJ Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, COF-PJ has a market cap of 123.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while COF-PJ trades at $17.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas COF-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.70. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to COF-PJ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to COF-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs COF-PI Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, COF-PI has a market cap of 123B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while COF-PI trades at $18.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas COF-PI's P/E ratio is 0.74. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to COF-PI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to COF-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs BNH Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, BNH has a market cap of 95.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while BNH trades at $15.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas BNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to BNH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to BNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs PYPL Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, PYPL has a market cap of 70.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while PYPL trades at $72.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas PYPL's P/E ratio is 16.36. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to PYPL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to PYPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs DFS Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, DFS has a market cap of 50.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while DFS trades at $200.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas DFS's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to DFS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to DFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs SYF Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, SYF has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while SYF trades at $57.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas SYF's P/E ratio is 7.92. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to SYF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to SYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs KKRS Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, KKRS has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while KKRS trades at $17.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas KKRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to KKRS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to KKRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs SOFI Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, SOFI has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while SOFI trades at $13.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas SOFI's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to SOFI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to SOFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs ALLY Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, ALLY has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while ALLY trades at $35.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas ALLY's P/E ratio is 58.86. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to ALLY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to ALLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs AGM-PC Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, AGM-PC has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while AGM-PC trades at $348.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas AGM-PC's P/E ratio is 31.38. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to AGM-PC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to AGM-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs SYF-PB Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, SYF-PB has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while SYF-PB trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas SYF-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to SYF-PB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to SYF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs OBDC Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, OBDC has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while OBDC trades at $14.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas OBDC's P/E ratio is 9.40. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to OBDC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to OBDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs SYF-PA Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, SYF-PA has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while SYF-PA trades at $18.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas SYF-PA's P/E ratio is 2.49. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to SYF-PA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to SYF-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs SLMBP Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, SLMBP has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while SLMBP trades at $79.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas SLMBP's P/E ratio is 37.25. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to SLMBP's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to SLMBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs SLM Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, SLM has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while SLM trades at $32.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas SLM's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to SLM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to SLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs OMF Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, OMF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while OMF trades at $51.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas OMF's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to OMF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to OMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs CGABL Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, CGABL has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while CGABL trades at $16.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas CGABL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to CGABL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to CGABL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs CACC Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, CACC has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while CACC trades at $487.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas CACC's P/E ratio is 20.75. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to CACC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to CACC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs FCFS Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, FCFS has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while FCFS trades at $124.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas FCFS's P/E ratio is 19.89. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to FCFS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to FCFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs ORCC Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, ORCC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while ORCC trades at $13.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas ORCC's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to ORCC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to ORCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs JSM Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, JSM has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while JSM trades at $18.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas JSM's P/E ratio is 15.32. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to JSM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to JSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs IX Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, IX has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while IX trades at $21.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas IX's P/E ratio is 10.03. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to IX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to IX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs UPST Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, UPST has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while UPST trades at $50.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas UPST's P/E ratio is -69.40. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to UPST's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to UPST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs NNI Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, NNI has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while NNI trades at $114.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas NNI's P/E ratio is 21.53. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to NNI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to NNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs SEZL Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, SEZL has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while SEZL trades at $119.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas SEZL's P/E ratio is 40.32. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to SEZL's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to SEZL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs WU Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, WU has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while WU trades at $9.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas WU's P/E ratio is 3.46. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to WU's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to WU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs QFIN Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, QFIN has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while QFIN trades at $42.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas QFIN's P/E ratio is 6.56. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to QFIN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to QFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs ADS Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, ADS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while ADS trades at $56.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas ADS's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to ADS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to ADS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs ENVA Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, ENVA has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while ENVA trades at $92.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas ENVA's P/E ratio is 10.95. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to ENVA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to ENVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs BFH Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, BFH has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while BFH trades at $50.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas BFH's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to BFH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to BFH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs FINV Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, FINV has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while FINV trades at $8.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas FINV's P/E ratio is 6.26. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to FINV's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to FINV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs AGM-PD Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, AGM-PD has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while AGM-PD trades at $21.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas AGM-PD's P/E ratio is 1.89. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to AGM-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to AGM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs AGM Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, AGM has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while AGM trades at $188.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas AGM's P/E ratio is 11.64. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to AGM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to AGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs AGM-PG Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, AGM-PG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while AGM-PG trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas AGM-PG's P/E ratio is 1.62. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to AGM-PG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to AGM-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs AGM-PE Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, AGM-PE has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while AGM-PE trades at $21.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas AGM-PE's P/E ratio is 1.93. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to AGM-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to AGM-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs AGM-PF Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, AGM-PF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while AGM-PF trades at $19.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas AGM-PF's P/E ratio is 1.75. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to AGM-PF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to AGM-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs AGM-A Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, AGM-A has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while AGM-A trades at $133.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas AGM-A's P/E ratio is 8.23. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to AGM-A's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to AGM-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs NAVI Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, NAVI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while NAVI trades at $13.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas NAVI's P/E ratio is 26.08. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to NAVI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to NAVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs OCSL Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, OCSL has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while OCSL trades at $14.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas OCSL's P/E ratio is 117.38. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to OCSL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to OCSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs LU Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, LU has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while LU trades at $2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas LU's P/E ratio is -3.89. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to LU's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to LU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs LC Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, LC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while LC trades at $10.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas LC's P/E ratio is 23.61. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to LC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to LC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs MGI Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, MGI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while MGI trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas MGI's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to MGI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to MGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs BBDC Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, BBDC has a market cap of 931.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while BBDC trades at $8.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas BBDC's P/E ratio is 9.41. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to BBDC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to BBDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs WRLD Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, WRLD has a market cap of 831.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while WRLD trades at $156.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas WRLD's P/E ratio is 9.61. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to WRLD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to WRLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs NRDS Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, NRDS has a market cap of 804.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while NRDS trades at $10.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas NRDS's P/E ratio is 29.16. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to NRDS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to NRDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs ATLCZ Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, ATLCZ has a market cap of 740.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while ATLCZ trades at $25.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas ATLCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to ATLCZ's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to ATLCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs ATLC Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, ATLC has a market cap of 736M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while ATLC trades at $48.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas ATLC's P/E ratio is 9.41. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to ATLC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to ATLC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs ATLCL Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, ATLCL has a market cap of 735.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while ATLCL trades at $23.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas ATLCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to ATLCL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to ATLCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs EZPW Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, EZPW has a market cap of 722.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while EZPW trades at $13.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas EZPW's P/E ratio is 11.03. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to EZPW's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to EZPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs LX Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, LX has a market cap of 624.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while LX trades at $7.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas LX's P/E ratio is 6.93. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to LX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to LX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs PRAA Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, PRAA has a market cap of 570.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while PRAA trades at $14.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas PRAA's P/E ratio is 8.04. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to PRAA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to PRAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs GDOT Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, GDOT has a market cap of 518.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while GDOT trades at $9.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas GDOT's P/E ratio is -78.71. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to GDOT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to GDOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs QD Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, QD has a market cap of 495.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while QD trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas QD's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to QD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to QD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs RWAYL Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, RWAYL has a market cap of 371M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while RWAYL trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas RWAYL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to RWAYL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to RWAYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs RWAYZ Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, RWAYZ has a market cap of 369.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while RWAYZ trades at $25.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas RWAYZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to RWAYZ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to RWAYZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs RWAY Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, RWAY has a market cap of 361.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while RWAY trades at $9.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas RWAY's P/E ratio is 5.90. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to RWAY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to RWAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs ATLCP Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, ATLCP has a market cap of 340.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while ATLCP trades at $22.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas ATLCP's P/E ratio is 2.96. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to ATLCP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to ATLCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs NEWTI Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, NEWTI has a market cap of 281.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while NEWTI trades at $25.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas NEWTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to NEWTI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to NEWTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs YRD Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, YRD has a market cap of 277.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while YRD trades at $6.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas YRD's P/E ratio is 2.56. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to YRD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to YRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs OPRT Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, OPRT has a market cap of 272.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while OPRT trades at $6.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas OPRT's P/E ratio is -5.87. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to OPRT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to OPRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs RM Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, RM has a market cap of 266.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while RM trades at $26.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas RM's P/E ratio is 8.20. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to RM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to RM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs PMTS Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, PMTS has a market cap of 241.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while PMTS trades at $21.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas PMTS's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to PMTS's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to PMTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs FOA Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, FOA has a market cap of 235.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while FOA trades at $21.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas FOA's P/E ratio is 4.73. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to FOA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to FOA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs LPRO Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, LPRO has a market cap of 229.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while LPRO trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas LPRO's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to LPRO's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to LPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs MFIN Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, MFIN has a market cap of 216.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while MFIN trades at $9.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas MFIN's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to MFIN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to MFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs CPSS Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, CPSS has a market cap of 201.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while CPSS trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas CPSS's P/E ratio is 11.84. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to CPSS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to CPSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs SUNL Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, SUNL has a market cap of 146.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while SUNL trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas SUNL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to SUNL's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to SUNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs XYF Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, XYF has a market cap of 137.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while XYF trades at $18.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas XYF's P/E ratio is 3.85. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to XYF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to XYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs AHG Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, AHG has a market cap of 116.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while AHG trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas AHG's P/E ratio is -18.15. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to AHG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to AHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs ELVT Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, ELVT has a market cap of 58.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while ELVT trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas ELVT's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to ELVT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to ELVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs NICK Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, NICK has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while NICK trades at $6.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas NICK's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to NICK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to NICK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs OMCC Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, OMCC has a market cap of 35.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while OMCC trades at $5.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas OMCC's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to OMCC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to OMCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs CURR Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, CURR has a market cap of 23.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while CURR trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas CURR's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to CURR's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to CURR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs NISN Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, NISN has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while NISN trades at $4.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas NISN's P/E ratio is 18.96. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to NISN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to NISN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs JT Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, JT has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while JT trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas JT's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to JT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to JT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs MCVT Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, MCVT has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while MCVT trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas MCVT's P/E ratio is 9.37. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to MCVT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to MCVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs LMFA Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, LMFA has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while LMFA trades at $1.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas LMFA's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to LMFA's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to LMFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs SNTG Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, SNTG has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while SNTG trades at $1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas SNTG's P/E ratio is -1.99. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to SNTG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to SNTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs CURO Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, CURO has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while CURO trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas CURO's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to CURO's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to CURO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs PT Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, PT has a market cap of 374.2K. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while PT trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas PT's P/E ratio is -6.07. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to PT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to PT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs DXF Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, DXF has a market cap of 3.3K. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while DXF trades at $6.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas DXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to DXF's ROE of -22.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to DXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs MRLN Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, MRLN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while MRLN trades at $23.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas MRLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to MRLN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to MRLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs GJP Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, GJP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while GJP trades at $24.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas GJP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to GJP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to GJP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs AEFC Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, AEFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while AEFC trades at $19.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas AEFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to AEFC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to AEFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs IPB Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, IPB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while IPB trades at $26.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas IPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to IPB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to IPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs WEI Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, WEI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while WEI trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas WEI's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to WEI's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to WEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs SOFIW Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, SOFIW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while SOFIW trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas SOFIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to SOFIW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to SOFIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs NRUC Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, NRUC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while NRUC trades at $23.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas NRUC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to NRUC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to NRUC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs GJT Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, GJT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while GJT trades at $22.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas GJT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to GJT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to GJT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs GJO Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, GJO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while GJO trades at $25.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas GJO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to GJO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to GJO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs SC Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, SC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while SC trades at $41.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas SC's P/E ratio is 4.13. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to SC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to SC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs KTN Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 9.7M. In comparison, KTN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.92, while KTN trades at $26.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas KTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to KTN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is more volatile compared to KTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.