Senmiao Technology Limited
Senmiao Technology Limited AIHS Peers
See (AIHS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Credit Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AIHS | $0.98 | -0.01% | 10.31M | -2.80 | -$0.35 | N/A |
| V | $356.12 | +0.08% | 690.57B | 35.83 | $9.94 | +0.79% |
| MA | $576.48 | -0.31% | 519.56B | 40.40 | $14.27 | +0.49% |
| AXP | $302.32 | +1.14% | 211.80B | 21.13 | $14.31 | +0.97% |
| BNH | $16.06 | +1.13% | 88.96B | N/A | N/A | +0.55% |
| COF | $201.02 | +0.54% | 77.02B | 16.89 | $11.90 | +0.89% |
| PYPL | $72.29 | -0.03% | 70.30B | 16.24 | $4.45 | N/A |
| DFS | $203.99 | +0.75% | 51.33B | 10.89 | $18.73 | +1.37% |
| SYF | $61.34 | +1.62% | 23.35B | 8.40 | $7.30 | +1.70% |
| SOFI | $14.29 | +1.78% | 15.80B | 33.23 | $0.43 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
AIHS vs V Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, V has a market cap of 690.57B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while V trades at $356.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas V's P/E ratio is 35.83. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to V's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs MA Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, MA has a market cap of 519.56B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while MA trades at $576.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas MA's P/E ratio is 40.40. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to MA's ROE of +1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to MA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs AXP Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, AXP has a market cap of 211.80B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while AXP trades at $302.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas AXP's P/E ratio is 21.13. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to AXP's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to AXP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs BNH Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, BNH has a market cap of 88.96B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while BNH trades at $16.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas BNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to BNH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to BNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs COF Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, COF has a market cap of 77.02B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while COF trades at $201.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas COF's P/E ratio is 16.89. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to COF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to COF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs PYPL Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, PYPL has a market cap of 70.30B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while PYPL trades at $72.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas PYPL's P/E ratio is 16.24. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to PYPL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to PYPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs DFS Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, DFS has a market cap of 51.33B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while DFS trades at $203.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas DFS's P/E ratio is 10.89. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to DFS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to DFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs SYF Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, SYF has a market cap of 23.35B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while SYF trades at $61.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas SYF's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to SYF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to SYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs SOFI Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, SOFI has a market cap of 15.80B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while SOFI trades at $14.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas SOFI's P/E ratio is 33.23. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to SOFI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to SOFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs KKRS Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, KKRS has a market cap of 15.54B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while KKRS trades at $17.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas KKRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to KKRS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to KKRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs ALLY Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, ALLY has a market cap of 11.25B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while ALLY trades at $36.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas ALLY's P/E ratio is 65.43. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to ALLY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to ALLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs AGM-PC Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, AGM-PC has a market cap of 9.77B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while AGM-PC trades at $348.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas AGM-PC's P/E ratio is 31.38. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to AGM-PC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to AGM-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs SYF-PB Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, SYF-PB has a market cap of 9.50B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while SYF-PB trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas SYF-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to SYF-PB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to SYF-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs OBDC Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, OBDC has a market cap of 7.45B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while OBDC trades at $14.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas OBDC's P/E ratio is 9.53. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to OBDC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to OBDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs COF-PI Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, COF-PI has a market cap of 7.25B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while COF-PI trades at $18.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas COF-PI's P/E ratio is 0.74. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to COF-PI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to COF-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs COF-PJ Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, COF-PJ has a market cap of 6.95B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while COF-PJ trades at $18.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas COF-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.71. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to COF-PJ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to COF-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs SYF-PA Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, SYF-PA has a market cap of 6.79B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while SYF-PA trades at $17.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas SYF-PA's P/E ratio is 2.42. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to SYF-PA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to SYF-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs COF-PK Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, COF-PK has a market cap of 6.73B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while COF-PK trades at $17.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas COF-PK's P/E ratio is 0.69. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to COF-PK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to COF-PK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs COF-PL Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, COF-PL has a market cap of 6.34B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while COF-PL trades at $16.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas COF-PL's P/E ratio is 0.65. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to COF-PL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to COF-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs COF-PN Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, COF-PN has a market cap of 6.27B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while COF-PN trades at $16.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas COF-PN's P/E ratio is 0.64. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to COF-PN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to COF-PN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs OMF Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, OMF has a market cap of 6.23B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while OMF trades at $52.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas OMF's P/E ratio is 11.07. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to OMF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to OMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs CGABL Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, CGABL has a market cap of 6.09B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while CGABL trades at $16.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas CGABL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to CGABL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to CGABL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs CACC Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, CACC has a market cap of 5.78B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while CACC trades at $498.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas CACC's P/E ratio is 21.23. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to CACC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to CACC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs FCFS Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, FCFS has a market cap of 5.76B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while FCFS trades at $129.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas FCFS's P/E ratio is 20.79. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to FCFS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to FCFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs SLM Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, SLM has a market cap of 5.53B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while SLM trades at $26.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas SLM's P/E ratio is 9.63. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to SLM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to SLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs SLMBP Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, SLMBP has a market cap of 5.43B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while SLMBP trades at $69.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas SLMBP's P/E ratio is 32.33. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to SLMBP's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to SLMBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs ORCC Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, ORCC has a market cap of 5.25B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while ORCC trades at $13.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas ORCC's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to ORCC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to ORCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs UPST Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, UPST has a market cap of 5.11B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while UPST trades at $53.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas UPST's P/E ratio is -73.53. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to UPST's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to UPST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs JSM Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, JSM has a market cap of 5.00B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while JSM trades at $18.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas JSM's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to JSM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to JSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs IX Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, IX has a market cap of 4.57B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while IX trades at $20.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas IX's P/E ratio is 8.32. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to IX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to IX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs NNI Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, NNI has a market cap of 4.23B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while NNI trades at $116.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas NNI's P/E ratio is 23.16. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to NNI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to NNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs QFIN Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, QFIN has a market cap of 3.28B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while QFIN trades at $46.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas QFIN's P/E ratio is 8.05. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to QFIN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to QFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs WU Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, WU has a market cap of 3.21B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while WU trades at $9.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas WU's P/E ratio is 3.61. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to WU's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to WU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs SEZL Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, SEZL has a market cap of 3.01B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while SEZL trades at $90.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas SEZL's P/E ratio is 41.34. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to SEZL's ROE of +1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to SEZL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs ADS Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, ADS has a market cap of 2.85B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while ADS trades at $56.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas ADS's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to ADS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to ADS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs BFH Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, BFH has a market cap of 2.57B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while BFH trades at $55.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas BFH's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to BFH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to BFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs ENVA Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, ENVA has a market cap of 2.52B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while ENVA trades at $99.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas ENVA's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to ENVA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to ENVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs FINV Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, FINV has a market cap of 2.24B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while FINV trades at $8.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas FINV's P/E ratio is 7.13. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to FINV's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to FINV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs AGM Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, AGM has a market cap of 2.06B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while AGM trades at $193.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas AGM's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to AGM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to AGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs AGM-A Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, AGM-A has a market cap of 2.06B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while AGM-A trades at $145.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas AGM-A's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to AGM-A's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to AGM-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs AGM-PG Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, AGM-PG has a market cap of 2.04B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while AGM-PG trades at $18.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas AGM-PG's P/E ratio is 1.69. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to AGM-PG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to AGM-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs AGM-PD Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, AGM-PD has a market cap of 2.04B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while AGM-PD trades at $21.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas AGM-PD's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to AGM-PD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to AGM-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs AGM-PF Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, AGM-PF has a market cap of 2.02B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while AGM-PF trades at $20.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas AGM-PF's P/E ratio is 1.81. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to AGM-PF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to AGM-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs AGM-PE Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, AGM-PE has a market cap of 2.01B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while AGM-PE trades at $21.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas AGM-PE's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to AGM-PE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to AGM-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs NAVI Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, NAVI has a market cap of 1.39B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while NAVI trades at $13.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas NAVI's P/E ratio is 26.50. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to NAVI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to NAVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs LC Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, LC has a market cap of 1.30B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while LC trades at $11.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas LC's P/E ratio is 25.93. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to LC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to LC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs OCSL Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, OCSL has a market cap of 1.25B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while OCSL trades at $14.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas OCSL's P/E ratio is 118.67. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to OCSL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to OCSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs LU Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, LU has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while LU trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas LU's P/E ratio is -3.85. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to LU's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to LU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs MGI Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, MGI has a market cap of 1.07B. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while MGI trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas MGI's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to MGI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS and MGI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AIHS vs BBDC Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, BBDC has a market cap of 934.17M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while BBDC trades at $8.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas BBDC's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to BBDC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to BBDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs ATLCZ Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, ATLCZ has a market cap of 884.22M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while ATLCZ trades at $25.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas ATLCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to ATLCZ's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to ATLCZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs ATLC Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, ATLC has a market cap of 873.08M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while ATLC trades at $57.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas ATLC's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to ATLC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to ATLC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs NRDS Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, NRDS has a market cap of 865.09M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while NRDS trades at $11.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas NRDS's P/E ratio is 31.38. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to NRDS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to NRDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs WRLD Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, WRLD has a market cap of 859.24M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while WRLD trades at $149.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas WRLD's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to WRLD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to WRLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs ATLCL Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, ATLCL has a market cap of 830.97M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while ATLCL trades at $24.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas ATLCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to ATLCL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to ATLCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs EZPW Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, EZPW has a market cap of 779.55M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while EZPW trades at $14.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas EZPW's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to EZPW's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to EZPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs LX Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, LX has a market cap of 738.68M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while LX trades at $8.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas LX's P/E ratio is 9.87. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to LX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to LX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs PRAA Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, PRAA has a market cap of 603.61M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while PRAA trades at $15.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas PRAA's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to PRAA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to PRAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs GDOT Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, GDOT has a market cap of 572.60M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while GDOT trades at $10.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas GDOT's P/E ratio is -20.87. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to GDOT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to GDOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs QD Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, QD has a market cap of 491.25M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while QD trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas QD's P/E ratio is 42.50. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to QD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to QD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs RWAY Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, RWAY has a market cap of 374.97M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while RWAY trades at $10.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas RWAY's P/E ratio is 5.31. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to RWAY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to RWAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs RWAYL Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, RWAYL has a market cap of 353.09M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while RWAYL trades at $25.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas RWAYL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to RWAYL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to RWAYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs ATLCP Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, ATLCP has a market cap of 351.49M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while ATLCP trades at $23.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas ATLCP's P/E ratio is 3.05. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to ATLCP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to ATLCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs RWAYZ Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, RWAYZ has a market cap of 341.68M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while RWAYZ trades at $25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas RWAYZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to RWAYZ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to RWAYZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs RM Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, RM has a market cap of 297.72M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while RM trades at $30.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas RM's P/E ratio is 9.15. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to RM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to RM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs NEWTI Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, NEWTI has a market cap of 284.53M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while NEWTI trades at $25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas NEWTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to NEWTI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS and NEWTI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
AIHS vs YRD Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, YRD has a market cap of 280.17M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while YRD trades at $6.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas YRD's P/E ratio is 2.60. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to YRD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to YRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs OPRT Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, OPRT has a market cap of 273.38M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while OPRT trades at $7.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas OPRT's P/E ratio is -3.74. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to OPRT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to OPRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs PMTS Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, PMTS has a market cap of 260.60M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while PMTS trades at $23.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas PMTS's P/E ratio is 14.09. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to PMTS's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to PMTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs FOA Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, FOA has a market cap of 240.20M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while FOA trades at $21.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas FOA's P/E ratio is 16.04. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to FOA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to FOA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs LPRO Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, LPRO has a market cap of 239.57M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while LPRO trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas LPRO's P/E ratio is -1.77. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to LPRO's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to LPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs MFIN Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, MFIN has a market cap of 218.42M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while MFIN trades at $9.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas MFIN's P/E ratio is 5.88. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to MFIN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to MFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs CPSS Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, CPSS has a market cap of 206.50M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while CPSS trades at $9.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas CPSS's P/E ratio is 12.19. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to CPSS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to CPSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs SUNL Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, SUNL has a market cap of 146.12M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while SUNL trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas SUNL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to SUNL's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to SUNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs AHG Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, AHG has a market cap of 118.35M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while AHG trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas AHG's P/E ratio is -18.50. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to AHG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to AHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs XYF Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, XYF has a market cap of 103.91M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while XYF trades at $14.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas XYF's P/E ratio is 3.41. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to XYF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to XYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs ELVT Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, ELVT has a market cap of 58.83M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while ELVT trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas ELVT's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to ELVT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to ELVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs CURR Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, CURR has a market cap of 51.65M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while CURR trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas CURR's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to CURR's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to CURR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs NICK Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, NICK has a market cap of 45.19M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while NICK trades at $6.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas NICK's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to NICK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to NICK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs OMCC Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, OMCC has a market cap of 33.63M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while OMCC trades at $5.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas OMCC's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to OMCC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to OMCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs NISN Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, NISN has a market cap of 23.38M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while NISN trades at $5.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas NISN's P/E ratio is 22.04. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to NISN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to NISN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs JT Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, JT has a market cap of 16.55M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while JT trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas JT's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to JT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to JT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs MCVT Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, MCVT has a market cap of 9.94M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while MCVT trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas MCVT's P/E ratio is 9.11. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to MCVT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to MCVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs LMFA Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, LMFA has a market cap of 9.60M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while LMFA trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas LMFA's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to LMFA's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to LMFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs SNTG Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, SNTG has a market cap of 5.33M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while SNTG trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas SNTG's P/E ratio is -2.35. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to SNTG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to SNTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs CURO Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, CURO has a market cap of 2.89M. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while CURO trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas CURO's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to CURO's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to CURO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs PT Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, PT has a market cap of 383670.00. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while PT trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas PT's P/E ratio is -6.66. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to PT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to PT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.
AIHS vs DXF Comparison
AIHS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AIHS stands at 10.31M. In comparison, DXF has a market cap of 3844.00. Regarding current trading prices, AIHS is priced at $0.98, while DXF trades at $7.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AIHS currently has a P/E ratio of -2.80, whereas DXF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, AIHS's ROE is +129.39%, compared to DXF's ROE of -22.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AIHS is less volatile compared to DXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AIHS.