Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, V has a market cap of 692.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while V trades at $355.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas V's P/E ratio is 35.89. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to V's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is more volatile compared to V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check V's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MA has a market cap of 512.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while MA trades at $567.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas MA's P/E ratio is 39.85. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MA's ROE of +1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is more volatile compared to MA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check MA's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AXP has a market cap of 216.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while AXP trades at $310.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas AXP's P/E ratio is 21.89. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AXP's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is more volatile compared to AXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check AXP's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, COF has a market cap of 136.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while COF trades at $212.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas COF's P/E ratio is 608.11. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to COF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is more volatile compared to COF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check COF's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, COF-PI has a market cap of 135.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while COF-PI trades at $19.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas COF-PI's P/E ratio is 0.77. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to COF-PI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is more volatile compared to COF-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check COF-PI's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, COF-PN has a market cap of 135.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while COF-PN trades at $16.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas COF-PN's P/E ratio is 0.67. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to COF-PN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is more volatile compared to COF-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check COF-PN's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, COF-PK has a market cap of 135.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while COF-PK trades at $17.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas COF-PK's P/E ratio is 0.70. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to COF-PK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is more volatile compared to COF-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check COF-PK's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, COF-PL has a market cap of 135.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while COF-PL trades at $17.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas COF-PL's P/E ratio is 0.67. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to COF-PL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is more volatile compared to COF-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check COF-PL's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, COF-PJ has a market cap of 135.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while COF-PJ trades at $18.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas COF-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.73. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to COF-PJ's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is more volatile compared to COF-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check COF-PJ's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BNH has a market cap of 112.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while BNH trades at $15.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas BNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BNH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is more volatile compared to BNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check BNH's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PYPL has a market cap of 75.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while PYPL trades at $78.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas PYPL's P/E ratio is 17.53. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PYPL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is more volatile compared to PYPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check PYPL's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, DFS has a market cap of 50.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while DFS trades at $200.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas DFS's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DFS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is more volatile compared to DFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check DFS's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SYF has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while SYF trades at $72.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas SYF's P/E ratio is 8.86. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SYF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is more volatile compared to SYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check SYF's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SOFI has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while SOFI trades at $20.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas SOFI's P/E ratio is 49.30. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SOFI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to SOFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check SOFI's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, KKRS has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while KKRS trades at $17.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas KKRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KKRS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is more volatile compared to KKRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check KKRS's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ALLY has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while ALLY trades at $38.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas ALLY's P/E ratio is 64.22. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ALLY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is more volatile compared to ALLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check ALLY's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AGM-PC has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while AGM-PC trades at $348.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas AGM-PC's P/E ratio is 31.38. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AGM-PC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to AGM-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check AGM-PC's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SYF-PB has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while SYF-PB trades at $25.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas SYF-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SYF-PB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is more volatile compared to SYF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check SYF-PB's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, UPST has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while UPST trades at $80.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas UPST's P/E ratio is -114.42. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to UPST's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to UPST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check UPST's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, OBDC has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while OBDC trades at $14.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas OBDC's P/E ratio is 9.58. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OBDC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is more volatile compared to OBDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check OBDC's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SYF-PA has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while SYF-PA trades at $19.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas SYF-PA's P/E ratio is 2.63. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SYF-PA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is more volatile compared to SYF-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check SYF-PA's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, OMF has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while OMF trades at $58.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas OMF's P/E ratio is 12.55. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is more volatile compared to OMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check OMF's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SLM has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while SLM trades at $32.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas SLM's P/E ratio is 11.45. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SLM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is more volatile compared to SLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check SLM's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SLMBP has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while SLMBP trades at $75.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas SLMBP's P/E ratio is 35.39. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SLMBP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is more volatile compared to SLMBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check SLMBP's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CGABL has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while CGABL trades at $17.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas CGABL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CGABL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is more volatile compared to CGABL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check CGABL's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CACC has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while CACC trades at $512.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas CACC's P/E ratio is 22.18. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CACC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is more volatile compared to CACC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check CACC's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, FCFS has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while FCFS trades at $120.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas FCFS's P/E ratio is 18.81. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FCFS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to FCFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check FCFS's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ORCC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while ORCC trades at $13.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas ORCC's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ORCC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is more volatile compared to ORCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check ORCC's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, IX has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while IX trades at $22.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas IX's P/E ratio is 11.10. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is more volatile compared to IX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check IX's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, JSM has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while JSM trades at $18.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas JSM's P/E ratio is 15.60. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JSM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is more volatile compared to JSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check JSM's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SEZL has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while SEZL trades at $144.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas SEZL's P/E ratio is 50.15. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SEZL's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to SEZL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check SEZL's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NNI has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while NNI trades at $125.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas NNI's P/E ratio is 23.55. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NNI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is more volatile compared to NNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check NNI's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BFH has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while BFH trades at $64.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas BFH's P/E ratio is 11.16. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BFH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to BFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check BFH's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ADS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while ADS trades at $56.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas ADS's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ADS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to ADS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check ADS's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, WU has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while WU trades at $8.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas WU's P/E ratio is 3.19. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WU's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is more volatile compared to WU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check WU's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ENVA has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while ENVA trades at $104.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas ENVA's P/E ratio is 12.49. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ENVA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to ENVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check ENVA's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, QFIN has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while QFIN trades at $35.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas QFIN's P/E ratio is 5.42. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to QFIN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to QFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check QFIN's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, FINV has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while FINV trades at $8.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas FINV's P/E ratio is 6.43. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FINV's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to FINV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check FINV's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AGM-PG has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while AGM-PG trades at $18.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas AGM-PG's P/E ratio is 1.62. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AGM-PG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is more volatile compared to AGM-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check AGM-PG's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AGM has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while AGM trades at $174.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas AGM's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AGM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is more volatile compared to AGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check AGM's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AGM-PE has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while AGM-PE trades at $21.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas AGM-PE's P/E ratio is 1.94. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AGM-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is more volatile compared to AGM-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check AGM-PE's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AGM-PF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while AGM-PF trades at $19.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas AGM-PF's P/E ratio is 1.74. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AGM-PF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is more volatile compared to AGM-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check AGM-PF's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AGM-PD has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while AGM-PD trades at $21.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas AGM-PD's P/E ratio is 1.95. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AGM-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is more volatile compared to AGM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check AGM-PD's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, LC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while LC trades at $12.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas LC's P/E ratio is 29.17. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is more volatile compared to LC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check LC's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NAVI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while NAVI trades at $14.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas NAVI's P/E ratio is 26.88. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NAVI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is more volatile compared to NAVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check NAVI's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, OCSL has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while OCSL trades at $14.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas OCSL's P/E ratio is 120.50. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OCSL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is more volatile compared to OCSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check OCSL's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, LU has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while LU trades at $2.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas LU's P/E ratio is -3.86. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LU's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to LU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check LU's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, LX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while LX trades at $6.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas LX's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to LX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check LX's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MGI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while MGI trades at $10.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas MGI's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MGI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is more volatile compared to MGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check MGI's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BBDC has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while BBDC trades at $9.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas BBDC's P/E ratio is 10.18. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BBDC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is more volatile compared to BBDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check BBDC's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, WRLD has a market cap of 844.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while WRLD trades at $162.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas WRLD's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WRLD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to WRLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check WRLD's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NRDS has a market cap of 816.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while NRDS trades at $10.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas NRDS's P/E ratio is 29.62. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NRDS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to NRDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check NRDS's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ATLCL has a market cap of 798.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while ATLCL trades at $24.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas ATLCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ATLCL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is more volatile compared to ATLCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check ATLCL's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ATLCZ has a market cap of 792.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while ATLCZ trades at $25.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas ATLCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ATLCZ's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is more volatile compared to ATLCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check ATLCZ's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ATLC has a market cap of 759.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while ATLC trades at $50.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas ATLC's P/E ratio is 9.72. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ATLC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is more volatile compared to ATLC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check ATLC's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, EZPW has a market cap of 736.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while EZPW trades at $13.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas EZPW's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EZPW's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is more volatile compared to EZPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check EZPW's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PRAA has a market cap of 625M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while PRAA trades at $15.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas PRAA's P/E ratio is 8.80. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PRAA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is more volatile compared to PRAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check PRAA's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GDOT has a market cap of 572M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while GDOT trades at $10.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas GDOT's P/E ratio is -86.83. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GDOT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to GDOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check GDOT's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, QD has a market cap of 539.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while QD trades at $3.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas QD's P/E ratio is 13.60. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to QD's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to QD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check QD's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, RWAYL has a market cap of 413.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while RWAYL trades at $25.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas RWAYL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RWAYL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is more volatile compared to RWAYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check RWAYL's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, RWAYZ has a market cap of 413.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while RWAYZ trades at $25.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas RWAYZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RWAYZ's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is more volatile compared to RWAYZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check RWAYZ's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, RWAY has a market cap of 412.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while RWAY trades at $10.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas RWAY's P/E ratio is 6.74. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RWAY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is more volatile compared to RWAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check RWAY's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ATLCP has a market cap of 332.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while ATLCP trades at $22.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas ATLCP's P/E ratio is 2.89. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ATLCP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is more volatile compared to ATLCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check ATLCP's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NEWTI has a market cap of 318.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while NEWTI trades at $25.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas NEWTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NEWTI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is more volatile compared to NEWTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check NEWTI's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, RM has a market cap of 317.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while RM trades at $31.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas RM's P/E ratio is 9.76. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is more volatile compared to RM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check RM's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, LPRO has a market cap of 316.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while LPRO trades at $2.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas LPRO's P/E ratio is -2.28. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LPRO's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to LPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check LPRO's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, OPRT has a market cap of 279M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while OPRT trades at $6.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas OPRT's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OPRT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to OPRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check OPRT's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, FOA has a market cap of 268.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while FOA trades at $23.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas FOA's P/E ratio is 5.40. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FOA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is more volatile compared to FOA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check FOA's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, YRD has a market cap of 268M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while YRD trades at $6.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas YRD's P/E ratio is 2.89. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to YRD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to YRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check YRD's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PMTS has a market cap of 236.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while PMTS trades at $21.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas PMTS's P/E ratio is 13.25. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PMTS's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to PMTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check PMTS's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MFIN has a market cap of 223.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while MFIN trades at $10.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas MFIN's P/E ratio is 6.01. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MFIN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to MFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check MFIN's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CPSS has a market cap of 195.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while CPSS trades at $8.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas CPSS's P/E ratio is 11.47. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CPSS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is more volatile compared to CPSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check CPSS's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CURR has a market cap of 174.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while CURR trades at $2.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas CURR's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CURR's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to CURR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check CURR's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SUNL has a market cap of 146.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while SUNL trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas SUNL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SUNL's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to SUNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check SUNL's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, XYF has a market cap of 100.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while XYF trades at $13.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas XYF's P/E ratio is 2.96. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to XYF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to XYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check XYF's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ELVT has a market cap of 58.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while ELVT trades at $1.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas ELVT's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ELVT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is more volatile compared to ELVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check ELVT's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NICK has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while NICK trades at $6.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas NICK's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NICK's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is more volatile compared to NICK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check NICK's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AHG has a market cap of 41.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while AHG trades at $2.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas AHG's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AHG's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to AHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check AHG's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, OMCC has a market cap of 41.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while OMCC trades at $6.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas OMCC's P/E ratio is -5.04. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OMCC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to OMCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check OMCC's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MCVT has a market cap of 35.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while MCVT trades at $5.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas MCVT's P/E ratio is 31.05. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MCVT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to MCVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check MCVT's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NISN has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while NISN trades at $4.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas NISN's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NISN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to NISN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check NISN's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, JT has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while JT trades at $0.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas JT's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to JT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check JT's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, LMFA has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while LMFA trades at $2.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas LMFA's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LMFA's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to LMFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check LMFA's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SNTG has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while SNTG trades at $1.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas SNTG's P/E ratio is -2.26. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SNTG's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is more volatile compared to SNTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check SNTG's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CURO has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while CURO trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas CURO's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CURO's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to CURO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check CURO's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AIHS has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while AIHS trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas AIHS's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AIHS's ROE of +129.39%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to AIHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check AIHS's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, DXF has a market cap of 836.3K. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while DXF trades at $5.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas DXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DXF's ROE of -17.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to DXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check DXF's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PT has a market cap of 378.3K. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while PT trades at $0.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas PT's P/E ratio is -6.13. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to PT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check PT's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GJP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while GJP trades at $24.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas GJP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GJP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is more volatile compared to GJP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check GJP's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SOFIW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while SOFIW trades at $5.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas SOFIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SOFIW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to SOFIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check SOFIW's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PYT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while PYT trades at $23.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas PYT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PYT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is more volatile compared to PYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check PYT's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GJO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while GJO trades at $24.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas GJO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GJO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is more volatile compared to GJO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check GJO's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NRUC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while NRUC trades at $24.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas NRUC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NRUC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is more volatile compared to NRUC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check NRUC's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, WEI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while WEI trades at $0.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas WEI's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WEI's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is less volatile compared to WEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check WEI's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, KTN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while KTN trades at $26.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas KTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KTN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is more volatile compared to KTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check KTN's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MRLN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while MRLN trades at $23.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas MRLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MRLN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is more volatile compared to MRLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check MRLN's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while SC trades at $41.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas SC's P/E ratio is 4.13. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is more volatile compared to SC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check SC's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GJS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while GJS trades at $22.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas GJS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GJS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is more volatile compared to GJS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check GJS's competition here

AGM-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AGM-A stands at 1.9B. In comparison, IPB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AGM-A is priced at $131.80, while IPB trades at $25.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AGM-A currently has a P/E ratio of 8.04, whereas IPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AGM-A's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IPB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AGM-A is more volatile compared to IPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AGM-A.Check IPB's competition here