Aegon Funding Company LLC
Aegon Funding Company LLC (AEFC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AEFC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Credit Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AEFC | $20.31 | +0.05% | 0 | N/A | N/A | +6.31% |
| V | $350.91 | -0.11% | 680.5B | 34.34 | $10.22 | +0.65% |
| MA | $559.11 | -0.75% | 504.1B | 39.25 | $14.25 | +0.53% |
| AXP | $303.41 | -1.66% | 211.2B | 21.32 | $14.23 | +1.01% |
| COF | $215.23 | +0.66% | 137.8B | 598.15 | $0.36 | +1.12% |
| COF-PK | $18.05 | -0.11% | 137.6B | 0.71 | $25.57 | +1.12% |
| COF-PJ | $18.69 | -0.53% | 136.8B | 0.73 | $25.57 | +1.12% |
| COF-PN | $17.04 | -0.23% | 136.4B | 0.67 | $25.57 | +1.12% |
| COF-PI | $19.63 | -0.46% | 136B | 0.77 | $25.57 | +1.12% |
| COF-PL | $17.17 | -0.58% | 135.7B | 0.67 | $25.57 | +1.12% |
Stock Comparison
AEFC vs V Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, V has a market cap of 680.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while V trades at $350.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas V's P/E ratio is 34.34. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to V's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check V's competition here
AEFC vs MA Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, MA has a market cap of 504.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while MA trades at $559.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MA's P/E ratio is 39.25. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MA's ROE of +1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to MA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check MA's competition here
AEFC vs AXP Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, AXP has a market cap of 211.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while AXP trades at $303.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AXP's P/E ratio is 21.32. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AXP's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to AXP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check AXP's competition here
AEFC vs COF Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, COF has a market cap of 137.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while COF trades at $215.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COF's P/E ratio is 598.15. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to COF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to COF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check COF's competition here
AEFC vs COF-PK Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, COF-PK has a market cap of 137.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while COF-PK trades at $18.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COF-PK's P/E ratio is 0.71. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to COF-PK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to COF-PK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check COF-PK's competition here
AEFC vs COF-PJ Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, COF-PJ has a market cap of 136.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while COF-PJ trades at $18.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COF-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.73. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to COF-PJ's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to COF-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check COF-PJ's competition here
AEFC vs COF-PN Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, COF-PN has a market cap of 136.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while COF-PN trades at $17.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COF-PN's P/E ratio is 0.67. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to COF-PN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to COF-PN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check COF-PN's competition here
AEFC vs COF-PI Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, COF-PI has a market cap of 136B. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while COF-PI trades at $19.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COF-PI's P/E ratio is 0.77. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to COF-PI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to COF-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check COF-PI's competition here
AEFC vs COF-PL Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, COF-PL has a market cap of 135.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while COF-PL trades at $17.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COF-PL's P/E ratio is 0.67. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to COF-PL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to COF-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check COF-PL's competition here
AEFC vs BNH Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, BNH has a market cap of 110B. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while BNH trades at $15.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BNH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to BNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check BNH's competition here
AEFC vs PYPL Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, PYPL has a market cap of 67.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while PYPL trades at $69.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PYPL's P/E ratio is 14.93. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PYPL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to PYPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check PYPL's competition here
AEFC vs DFS Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, DFS has a market cap of 50.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while DFS trades at $200.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFS's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DFS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to DFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check DFS's competition here
AEFC vs SYF Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, SYF has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while SYF trades at $70.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SYF's P/E ratio is 8.54. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SYF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to SYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check SYF's competition here
AEFC vs SOFI Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, SOFI has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while SOFI trades at $21.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOFI's P/E ratio is 43.83. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SOFI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to SOFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check SOFI's competition here
AEFC vs KKRS Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, KKRS has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while KKRS trades at $17.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KKRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KKRS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to KKRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check KKRS's competition here
AEFC vs ALLY Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, ALLY has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while ALLY trades at $38.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALLY's P/E ratio is 63.83. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ALLY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to ALLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check ALLY's competition here
AEFC vs AGM-PC Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, AGM-PC has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while AGM-PC trades at $348.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGM-PC's P/E ratio is 31.38. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGM-PC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to AGM-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check AGM-PC's competition here
AEFC vs SYF-PB Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, SYF-PB has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while SYF-PB trades at $26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SYF-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SYF-PB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is more volatile compared to SYF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check SYF-PB's competition here
AEFC vs UPST Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, UPST has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while UPST trades at $83.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UPST's P/E ratio is -114.14. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UPST's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to UPST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check UPST's competition here
AEFC vs OBDC Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, OBDC has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while OBDC trades at $14.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OBDC's P/E ratio is 9.29. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OBDC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to OBDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check OBDC's competition here
AEFC vs SYF-PA Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, SYF-PA has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while SYF-PA trades at $19.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SYF-PA's P/E ratio is 2.64. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SYF-PA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to SYF-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check SYF-PA's competition here
AEFC vs OMF Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, OMF has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while OMF trades at $57.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OMF's P/E ratio is 12.20. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to OMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check OMF's competition here
AEFC vs SLMBP Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, SLMBP has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while SLMBP trades at $75.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLMBP's P/E ratio is 35.37. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SLMBP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is more volatile compared to SLMBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check SLMBP's competition here
AEFC vs SLM Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, SLM has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while SLM trades at $31.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLM's P/E ratio is 15.45. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SLM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to SLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check SLM's competition here
AEFC vs CGABL Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, CGABL has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while CGABL trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGABL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CGABL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to CGABL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check CGABL's competition here
AEFC vs CACC Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, CACC has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while CACC trades at $504.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CACC's P/E ratio is 21.53. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CACC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to CACC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check CACC's competition here
AEFC vs FCFS Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, FCFS has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while FCFS trades at $130.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCFS's P/E ratio is 20.03. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCFS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to FCFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check FCFS's competition here
AEFC vs ORCC Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, ORCC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while ORCC trades at $13.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORCC's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ORCC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to ORCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check ORCC's competition here
AEFC vs JSM Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, JSM has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while JSM trades at $18.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JSM's P/E ratio is 15.75. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JSM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to JSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check JSM's competition here
AEFC vs IX Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, IX has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while IX trades at $22.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IX's P/E ratio is 10.82. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to IX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check IX's competition here
AEFC vs SEZL Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, SEZL has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while SEZL trades at $150.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEZL's P/E ratio is 50.99. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEZL's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to SEZL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check SEZL's competition here
AEFC vs NNI Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, NNI has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while NNI trades at $124.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NNI's P/E ratio is 23.57. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NNI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to NNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check NNI's competition here
AEFC vs BFH Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, BFH has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while BFH trades at $61.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BFH's P/E ratio is 10.90. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BFH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to BFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check BFH's competition here
AEFC vs ADS Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, ADS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while ADS trades at $56.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADS's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ADS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to ADS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check ADS's competition here
AEFC vs WU Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, WU has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while WU trades at $8.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WU's P/E ratio is 3.07. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WU's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to WU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check WU's competition here
AEFC vs ENVA Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, ENVA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while ENVA trades at $104.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENVA's P/E ratio is 11.16. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ENVA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to ENVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check ENVA's competition here
AEFC vs QFIN Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, QFIN has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while QFIN trades at $34.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QFIN's P/E ratio is 5.27. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QFIN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to QFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check QFIN's competition here
AEFC vs FINV Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, FINV has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while FINV trades at $8.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FINV's P/E ratio is 6.16. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FINV's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to FINV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check FINV's competition here
AEFC vs AGM-PF Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, AGM-PF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while AGM-PF trades at $19.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGM-PF's P/E ratio is 1.76. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGM-PF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to AGM-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check AGM-PF's competition here
AEFC vs AGM-PE Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, AGM-PE has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while AGM-PE trades at $21.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGM-PE's P/E ratio is 1.94. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGM-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is more volatile compared to AGM-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check AGM-PE's competition here
AEFC vs AGM-PD Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, AGM-PD has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while AGM-PD trades at $21.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGM-PD's P/E ratio is 1.97. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGM-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to AGM-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check AGM-PD's competition here
AEFC vs AGM-A Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, AGM-A has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while AGM-A trades at $130.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGM-A's P/E ratio is 8.04. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGM-A's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is more volatile compared to AGM-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check AGM-A's competition here
AEFC vs AGM-PG Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, AGM-PG has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while AGM-PG trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGM-PG's P/E ratio is 1.63. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGM-PG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to AGM-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check AGM-PG's competition here
AEFC vs AGM Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, AGM has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while AGM trades at $172.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGM's P/E ratio is 10.66. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to AGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check AGM's competition here
AEFC vs LC Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, LC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while LC trades at $15.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LC's P/E ratio is 36.10. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to LC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check LC's competition here
AEFC vs NAVI Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, NAVI has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while NAVI trades at $12.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NAVI's P/E ratio is 24.38. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NAVI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to NAVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check NAVI's competition here
AEFC vs OCSL Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, OCSL has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while OCSL trades at $13.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OCSL's P/E ratio is 115.92. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OCSL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to OCSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check OCSL's competition here
AEFC vs LU Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, LU has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while LU trades at $2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LU's P/E ratio is -3.70. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LU's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to LU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check LU's competition here
AEFC vs MGI Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, MGI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while MGI trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGI's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MGI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is more volatile compared to MGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check MGI's competition here
AEFC vs LX Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, LX has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while LX trades at $6.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LX's P/E ratio is 5.74. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to LX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check LX's competition here
AEFC vs BBDC Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, BBDC has a market cap of 979.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while BBDC trades at $9.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBDC's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BBDC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to BBDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check BBDC's competition here
AEFC vs WRLD Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, WRLD has a market cap of 859.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while WRLD trades at $157.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRLD's P/E ratio is 10.70. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WRLD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to WRLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check WRLD's competition here
AEFC vs NRDS Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, NRDS has a market cap of 799.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while NRDS trades at $10.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NRDS's P/E ratio is 29.00. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NRDS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to NRDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check NRDS's competition here
AEFC vs ATLC Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, ATLC has a market cap of 749.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while ATLC trades at $49.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATLC's P/E ratio is 9.58. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ATLC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to ATLC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check ATLC's competition here
AEFC vs ATLCL Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, ATLCL has a market cap of 743M. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while ATLCL trades at $24.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATLCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ATLCL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is more volatile compared to ATLCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check ATLCL's competition here
AEFC vs ATLCZ Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, ATLCZ has a market cap of 742M. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while ATLCZ trades at $25.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATLCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ATLCZ's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is more volatile compared to ATLCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check ATLCZ's competition here
AEFC vs EZPW Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, EZPW has a market cap of 732.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while EZPW trades at $13.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EZPW's P/E ratio is 11.19. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EZPW's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to EZPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check EZPW's competition here
AEFC vs QD Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, QD has a market cap of 617.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while QD trades at $3.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QD's P/E ratio is 15.58. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QD's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to QD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check QD's competition here
AEFC vs PRAA Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, PRAA has a market cap of 616.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while PRAA trades at $15.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRAA's P/E ratio is 8.68. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRAA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to PRAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check PRAA's competition here
AEFC vs GDOT Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, GDOT has a market cap of 554.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while GDOT trades at $10.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDOT's P/E ratio is -84.25. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GDOT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to GDOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check GDOT's competition here
AEFC vs RWAYZ Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, RWAYZ has a market cap of 406.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while RWAYZ trades at $25.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RWAYZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RWAYZ's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is more volatile compared to RWAYZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check RWAYZ's competition here
AEFC vs RWAYL Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, RWAYL has a market cap of 404.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while RWAYL trades at $25.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RWAYL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RWAYL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is more volatile compared to RWAYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check RWAYL's competition here
AEFC vs RWAY Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, RWAY has a market cap of 399.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while RWAY trades at $10.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RWAY's P/E ratio is 6.52. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RWAY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to RWAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check RWAY's competition here
AEFC vs ATLCP Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, ATLCP has a market cap of 332.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while ATLCP trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATLCP's P/E ratio is 2.89. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ATLCP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to ATLCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check ATLCP's competition here
AEFC vs RM Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, RM has a market cap of 308.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while RM trades at $31.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RM's P/E ratio is 9.49. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to RM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check RM's competition here
AEFC vs NEWTI Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, NEWTI has a market cap of 298.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while NEWTI trades at $25.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEWTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NEWTI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is more volatile compared to NEWTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check NEWTI's competition here
AEFC vs LPRO Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, LPRO has a market cap of 285.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while LPRO trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LPRO's P/E ratio is -2.05. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LPRO's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to LPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check LPRO's competition here
AEFC vs OPRT Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, OPRT has a market cap of 271.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while OPRT trades at $6.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OPRT's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OPRT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to OPRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check OPRT's competition here
AEFC vs YRD Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, YRD has a market cap of 254.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while YRD trades at $5.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YRD's P/E ratio is 2.73. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to YRD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to YRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check YRD's competition here
AEFC vs FOA Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, FOA has a market cap of 242.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while FOA trades at $21.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FOA's P/E ratio is 4.87. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FOA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to FOA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check FOA's competition here
AEFC vs MFIN Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, MFIN has a market cap of 234.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while MFIN trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MFIN's P/E ratio is 6.31. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MFIN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to MFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check MFIN's competition here
AEFC vs PMTS Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, PMTS has a market cap of 232.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while PMTS trades at $20.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMTS's P/E ratio is 13.05. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PMTS's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to PMTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check PMTS's competition here
AEFC vs CPSS Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, CPSS has a market cap of 178.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while CPSS trades at $8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPSS's P/E ratio is 10.51. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CPSS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to CPSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check CPSS's competition here
AEFC vs CURR Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, CURR has a market cap of 156.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while CURR trades at $2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CURR's P/E ratio is -2.34. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CURR's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to CURR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check CURR's competition here
AEFC vs SUNL Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, SUNL has a market cap of 146.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while SUNL trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUNL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SUNL's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to SUNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check SUNL's competition here
AEFC vs XYF Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, XYF has a market cap of 99.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while XYF trades at $14.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XYF's P/E ratio is 2.91. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XYF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to XYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check XYF's competition here
AEFC vs ELVT Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, ELVT has a market cap of 58.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while ELVT trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELVT's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ELVT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is more volatile compared to ELVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check ELVT's competition here
AEFC vs NICK Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, NICK has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while NICK trades at $6.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NICK's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NICK's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to NICK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check NICK's competition here
AEFC vs OMCC Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, OMCC has a market cap of 38.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while OMCC trades at $5.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OMCC's P/E ratio is -4.75. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OMCC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to OMCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check OMCC's competition here
AEFC vs MCVT Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, MCVT has a market cap of 36.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while MCVT trades at $6.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCVT's P/E ratio is 31.84. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MCVT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to MCVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check MCVT's competition here
AEFC vs AHG Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, AHG has a market cap of 34.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while AHG trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AHG's P/E ratio is -20.75. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AHG's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to AHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check AHG's competition here
AEFC vs AIHS Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, AIHS has a market cap of 29.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while AIHS trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIHS's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AIHS's ROE of +129.39%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to AIHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check AIHS's competition here
AEFC vs NISN Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, NISN has a market cap of 19.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while NISN trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NISN's P/E ratio is 18.04. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NISN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to NISN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check NISN's competition here
AEFC vs JT Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, JT has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while JT trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JT's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to JT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check JT's competition here
AEFC vs LMFA Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, LMFA has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while LMFA trades at $2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LMFA's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LMFA's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to LMFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check LMFA's competition here
AEFC vs SNTG Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, SNTG has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while SNTG trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNTG's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SNTG's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to SNTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check SNTG's competition here
AEFC vs CURO Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, CURO has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while CURO trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CURO's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CURO's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to CURO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check CURO's competition here
AEFC vs DXF Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, DXF has a market cap of 793.3K. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while DXF trades at $4.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DXF's ROE of -17.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to DXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check DXF's competition here
AEFC vs PT Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, PT has a market cap of 396.5K. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while PT trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PT's P/E ratio is -6.38. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to PT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check PT's competition here
AEFC vs SC Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, SC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while SC trades at $41.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SC's P/E ratio is 4.13. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is more volatile compared to SC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check SC's competition here
AEFC vs PYT Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, PYT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while PYT trades at $23.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PYT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PYT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is more volatile compared to PYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check PYT's competition here
AEFC vs NRUC Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, NRUC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while NRUC trades at $24.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NRUC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NRUC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is more volatile compared to NRUC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check NRUC's competition here
AEFC vs IPB Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, IPB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while IPB trades at $25.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IPB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is more volatile compared to IPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check IPB's competition here
AEFC vs GJT Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, GJT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while GJT trades at $22.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GJT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GJT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to GJT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check GJT's competition here
AEFC vs MRLN Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, MRLN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while MRLN trades at $23.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MRLN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is more volatile compared to MRLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check MRLN's competition here
AEFC vs WEI Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, WEI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while WEI trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WEI's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WEI's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to WEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check WEI's competition here
AEFC vs GJS Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, GJS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while GJS trades at $22.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GJS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GJS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is more volatile compared to GJS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check GJS's competition here
AEFC vs GJP Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, GJP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while GJP trades at $24.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GJP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GJP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is more volatile compared to GJP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check GJP's competition here
AEFC vs SOFIW Comparison July 2025
AEFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEFC stands at 0. In comparison, SOFIW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AEFC is priced at $20.31, while SOFIW trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEFC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOFIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEFC's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SOFIW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AEFC is less volatile compared to SOFIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEFC.Check SOFIW's competition here