Zuora, Inc.
Zuora, Inc. (ZUO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ZUO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZUO | $10.02 | +0.30% | 1.5B | -19.65 | -$0.51 | N/A |
| MSFT | $386.27 | -3.06% | 2.9T | 24.86 | $15.98 | +0.88% |
| ORCL | $140.17 | -10.46% | 425.7B | 27.79 | $5.33 | +1.35% |
| PLTR | $130.45 | -3.29% | 308.9B | 211.31 | $0.64 | N/A |
| ADBE | $245.28 | -5.38% | 108.3B | 15.49 | $16.69 | N/A |
| PANW | $144.71 | -4.16% | 103.6B | 94.71 | $1.57 | N/A |
| CRWD | $345.63 | -18.12% | 98B | -301.24 | -$1.29 | N/A |
| SNPS | $420.15 | -5.04% | 84.2B | 54.61 | $8.06 | N/A |
| NET | $159.33 | -17.29% | 62.4B | -611.08 | -$0.29 | N/A |
| VMW | $142.48 | -4.96% | 61.5B | 42.92 | $3.32 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ZUO vs MSFT Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MSFT has a market cap of 2.9T. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while MSFT trades at $386.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas MSFT's P/E ratio is 24.86. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to MSFT's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to MSFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check MSFT's competition here
ZUO vs ORCL Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ORCL has a market cap of 425.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while ORCL trades at $140.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas ORCL's P/E ratio is 27.79. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to ORCL's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to ORCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check ORCL's competition here
ZUO vs PLTR Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PLTR has a market cap of 308.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while PLTR trades at $130.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas PLTR's P/E ratio is 211.31. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to PLTR's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to PLTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check PLTR's competition here
ZUO vs ADBE Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 108.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while ADBE trades at $245.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 15.49. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check ADBE's competition here
ZUO vs PANW Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PANW has a market cap of 103.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while PANW trades at $144.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas PANW's P/E ratio is 94.71. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to PANW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to PANW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check PANW's competition here
ZUO vs CRWD Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CRWD has a market cap of 98B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while CRWD trades at $345.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas CRWD's P/E ratio is -301.24. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to CRWD's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to CRWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check CRWD's competition here
ZUO vs SNPS Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SNPS has a market cap of 84.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while SNPS trades at $420.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas SNPS's P/E ratio is 54.61. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to SNPS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to SNPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check SNPS's competition here
ZUO vs NET Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NET has a market cap of 62.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while NET trades at $159.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas NET's P/E ratio is -611.08. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to NET's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to NET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check NET's competition here
ZUO vs VMW Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VMW has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while VMW trades at $142.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas VMW's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to VMW's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is more volatile compared to VMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check VMW's competition here
ZUO vs FTNT Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FTNT has a market cap of 61.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while FTNT trades at $74.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas FTNT's P/E ratio is 33.06. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to FTNT's ROE of +1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to FTNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check FTNT's competition here
ZUO vs SQ Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SQ has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while SQ trades at $83.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas SQ's P/E ratio is 49.98. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to SQ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to SQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check SQ's competition here
ZUO vs CRWV Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CRWV has a market cap of 44.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while CRWV trades at $92.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas CRWV's P/E ratio is -53.77. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to CRWV's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to CRWV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check CRWV's competition here
ZUO vs XYZ Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, XYZ has a market cap of 32.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while XYZ trades at $50.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas XYZ's P/E ratio is 10.71. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to XYZ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to XYZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check XYZ's competition here
ZUO vs MDB Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MDB has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while MDB trades at $302.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas MDB's P/E ratio is -420.20. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to MDB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to MDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check MDB's competition here
ZUO vs NETE Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NETE has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while NETE trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas NETE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to NETE's ROE of +3.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to NETE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check NETE's competition here
ZUO vs SPLK Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SPLK has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while SPLK trades at $156.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas SPLK's P/E ratio is 103.22. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to SPLK's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is more volatile compared to SPLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check SPLK's competition here
ZUO vs ZS Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ZS has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while ZS trades at $143.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas ZS's P/E ratio is -639.00. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to ZS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to ZS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check ZS's competition here
ZUO vs CPAY Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CPAY has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while CPAY trades at $333.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas CPAY's P/E ratio is 23.48. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to CPAY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to CPAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check CPAY's competition here
ZUO vs FLT Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FLT has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while FLT trades at $303.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas FLT's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to FLT's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to FLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check FLT's competition here
ZUO vs CYBR Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CYBR has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while CYBR trades at $408.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas CYBR's P/E ratio is -139.06. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to CYBR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is more volatile compared to CYBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check CYBR's competition here
ZUO vs VRSN Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VRSN has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while VRSN trades at $211.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas VRSN's P/E ratio is 24.54. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to VRSN's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to VRSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check VRSN's competition here
ZUO vs CHKP Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CHKP has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while CHKP trades at $154.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas CHKP's P/E ratio is 16.53. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to CHKP's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to CHKP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check CHKP's competition here
ZUO vs AFRM Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AFRM has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while AFRM trades at $47.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas AFRM's P/E ratio is 63.05. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to AFRM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to AFRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check AFRM's competition here
ZUO vs TOST Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TOST has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while TOST trades at $25.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas TOST's P/E ratio is 48.32. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to TOST's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to TOST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check TOST's competition here
ZUO vs FFIV Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FFIV has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while FFIV trades at $270.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas FFIV's P/E ratio is 23.03. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to FFIV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to FFIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check FFIV's competition here
ZUO vs IOT Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, IOT has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while IOT trades at $24.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas IOT's P/E ratio is -382.71. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to IOT's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to IOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check IOT's competition here
ZUO vs NLOK Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NLOK has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while NLOK trades at $21.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas NLOK's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to NLOK's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to NLOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check NLOK's competition here
ZUO vs KSPI Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, KSPI has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while KSPI trades at $71.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas KSPI's P/E ratio is 6.34. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to KSPI's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to KSPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check KSPI's competition here
ZUO vs GEN Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GEN has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while GEN trades at $21.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas GEN's P/E ratio is 23.04. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to GEN's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to GEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check GEN's competition here
ZUO vs AKAM Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AKAM has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while AKAM trades at $96.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas AKAM's P/E ratio is 27.67. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to AKAM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to AKAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check AKAM's competition here
ZUO vs OKTA Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, OKTA has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while OKTA trades at $69.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas OKTA's P/E ratio is 67.54. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to OKTA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to OKTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check OKTA's competition here
ZUO vs GDDY Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GDDY has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while GDDY trades at $87.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas GDDY's P/E ratio is 15.62. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to GDDY's ROE of +2.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to GDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check GDDY's competition here
ZUO vs CFLT Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CFLT has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while CFLT trades at $30.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas CFLT's P/E ratio is -35.70. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to CFLT's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is more volatile compared to CFLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check CFLT's competition here
ZUO vs NTNX Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NTNX has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while NTNX trades at $37.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas NTNX's P/E ratio is 52.42. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to NTNX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to NTNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check NTNX's competition here
ZUO vs RBRK Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, RBRK has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while RBRK trades at $46.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas RBRK's P/E ratio is -32.41. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to RBRK's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to RBRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check RBRK's competition here
ZUO vs ALTR Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ALTR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while ALTR trades at $111.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas ALTR's P/E ratio is 699.06. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to ALTR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is more volatile compared to ALTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check ALTR's competition here
ZUO vs PLAN Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PLAN has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while PLAN trades at $63.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas PLAN's P/E ratio is -44.82. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to PLAN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is more volatile compared to PLAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check PLAN's competition here
ZUO vs SAIL Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SAIL has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while SAIL trades at $13.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas SAIL's P/E ratio is -12.23. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to SAIL's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to SAIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check SAIL's competition here
ZUO vs DOX Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, DOX has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while DOX trades at $67.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas DOX's P/E ratio is 13.57. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to DOX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to DOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check DOX's competition here
ZUO vs INFA Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, INFA has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while INFA trades at $24.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas INFA's P/E ratio is 826.33. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to INFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is more volatile compared to INFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check INFA's competition here
ZUO vs DBX Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, DBX has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while DBX trades at $24.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas DBX's P/E ratio is 14.48. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to DBX's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to DBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check DBX's competition here
ZUO vs HCP Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HCP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while HCP trades at $34.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas HCP's P/E ratio is -57.97. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to HCP's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is more volatile compared to HCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check HCP's competition here
ZUO vs JCOM Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, JCOM has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while JCOM trades at $142.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas JCOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to JCOM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to JCOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check JCOM's competition here
ZUO vs SQSP Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SQSP has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while SQSP trades at $46.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas SQSP's P/E ratio is -1164.25. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to SQSP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is more volatile compared to SQSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check SQSP's competition here
ZUO vs NEWR Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NEWR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while NEWR trades at $86.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas NEWR's P/E ratio is -41.62. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to NEWR's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is more volatile compared to NEWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check NEWR's competition here
ZUO vs DOCN Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, DOCN has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while DOCN trades at $59.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas DOCN's P/E ratio is 25.46. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to DOCN's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to DOCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check DOCN's competition here
ZUO vs PATH Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PATH has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while PATH trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas PATH's P/E ratio is 25.69. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to PATH's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to PATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check PATH's competition here
ZUO vs CCCS Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CCCS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while CCCS trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas CCCS's P/E ratio is -875.00. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to CCCS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to CCCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check CCCS's competition here
ZUO vs WEX Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, WEX has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while WEX trades at $151.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas WEX's P/E ratio is 18.59. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to WEX's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to WEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check WEX's competition here
ZUO vs CORZ Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CORZ has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while CORZ trades at $17.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas CORZ's P/E ratio is -7.69. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to CORZ's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to CORZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check CORZ's competition here
ZUO vs CORZZ Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CORZZ has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while CORZZ trades at $16.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas CORZZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to CORZZ's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is more volatile compared to CORZZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check CORZZ's competition here
ZUO vs KVYO Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, KVYO has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while KVYO trades at $15.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas KVYO's P/E ratio is -157.41. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to KVYO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to KVYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check KVYO's competition here
ZUO vs FOUR Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FOUR has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while FOUR trades at $57.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas FOUR's P/E ratio is 27.34. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to FOUR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to FOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check FOUR's competition here
ZUO vs KLAR Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, KLAR has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while KLAR trades at $12.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas KLAR's P/E ratio is -43.60. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to KLAR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to KLAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check KLAR's competition here
ZUO vs NVEI Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NVEI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while NVEI trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas NVEI's P/E ratio is 212.44. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to NVEI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is more volatile compared to NVEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check NVEI's competition here
ZUO vs BLSH Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BLSH has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while BLSH trades at $30.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas BLSH's P/E ratio is -5.17. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to BLSH's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to BLSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check BLSH's competition here
ZUO vs STNE Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, STNE has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while STNE trades at $16.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas STNE's P/E ratio is -28.60. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to STNE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to STNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check STNE's competition here
ZUO vs S Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, S has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while S trades at $12.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas S's P/E ratio is -10.31. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to S's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to S. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check S's competition here
ZUO vs ACIW Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ACIW has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while ACIW trades at $38.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas ACIW's P/E ratio is 16.55. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to ACIW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to ACIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check ACIW's competition here
ZUO vs ESMT Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ESMT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while ESMT trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas ESMT's P/E ratio is 153.67. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to ESMT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is more volatile compared to ESMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check ESMT's competition here
ZUO vs DLO Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, DLO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while DLO trades at $12.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas DLO's P/E ratio is 23.91. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to DLO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to DLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check DLO's competition here
ZUO vs WIX Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, WIX has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while WIX trades at $63.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas WIX's P/E ratio is 28.35. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to WIX's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to WIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check WIX's competition here
ZUO vs RELY Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, RELY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while RELY trades at $16.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas RELY's P/E ratio is 190.56. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to RELY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to RELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check RELY's competition here
ZUO vs PAGS Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PAGS has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while PAGS trades at $10.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas PAGS's P/E ratio is 8.07. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to PAGS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to PAGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check PAGS's competition here
ZUO vs CORZW Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CORZW has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while CORZW trades at $10.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas CORZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to CORZW's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to CORZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check CORZW's competition here
ZUO vs QLYS Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, QLYS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while QLYS trades at $86.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas QLYS's P/E ratio is 17.03. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to QLYS's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to QLYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check QLYS's competition here
ZUO vs BOX Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while BOX trades at $21.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 18.30. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to BOX's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to BOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check BOX's competition here
ZUO vs CCC Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CCC has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while CCC trades at $4.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas CCC's P/E ratio is -509.00. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to CCC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to CCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check CCC's competition here
ZUO vs CLBT Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CLBT has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while CLBT trades at $11.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas CLBT's P/E ratio is 42.45. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to CLBT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to CLBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check CLBT's competition here
ZUO vs SWI Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SWI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while SWI trades at $18.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas SWI's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to SWI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is more volatile compared to SWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check SWI's competition here
ZUO vs EEFT Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, EEFT has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while EEFT trades at $70.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas EEFT's P/E ratio is 10.60. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to EEFT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to EEFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check EEFT's competition here
ZUO vs EVOP Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, EVOP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while EVOP trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas EVOP's P/E ratio is -309.00. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to EVOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is more volatile compared to EVOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check EVOP's competition here
ZUO vs TDC Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TDC has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while TDC trades at $28.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas TDC's P/E ratio is 22.90. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to TDC's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to TDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check TDC's competition here
ZUO vs VRNS Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VRNS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while VRNS trades at $21.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas VRNS's P/E ratio is -20.96. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to VRNS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to VRNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check VRNS's competition here
ZUO vs TENB Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TENB has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while TENB trades at $17.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas TENB's P/E ratio is -66.37. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to TENB's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to TENB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check TENB's competition here
ZUO vs CSGS Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CSGS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while CSGS trades at $79.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas CSGS's P/E ratio is 40.37. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to CSGS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is more volatile compared to CSGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check CSGS's competition here
ZUO vs AVPT Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AVPT has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while AVPT trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas AVPT's P/E ratio is -1050.00. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to AVPT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to AVPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check AVPT's competition here
ZUO vs SPSC Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SPSC has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while SPSC trades at $54.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas SPSC's P/E ratio is 23.56. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to SPSC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to SPSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check SPSC's competition here
ZUO vs NTCT Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NTCT has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while NTCT trades at $28.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas NTCT's P/E ratio is 22.33. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to NTCT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to NTCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check NTCT's competition here
ZUO vs AVDX Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AVDX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while AVDX trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas AVDX's P/E ratio is -250.00. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to AVDX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is more volatile compared to AVDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check AVDX's competition here
ZUO vs GETVV Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GETVV has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while GETVV trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas GETVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to GETVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to GETVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check GETVV's competition here
ZUO vs WRD Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, WRD has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while WRD trades at $7.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas WRD's P/E ratio is -9.09. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to WRD's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to WRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check WRD's competition here
ZUO vs BB Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BB has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while BB trades at $3.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas BB's P/E ratio is 85.88. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to BB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to BB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check BB's competition here
ZUO vs PICS Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PICS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while PICS trades at $15.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas PICS's P/E ratio is 31.00. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to PICS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to PICS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check PICS's competition here
ZUO vs FORG Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FORG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while FORG trades at $23.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas FORG's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to FORG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to FORG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check FORG's competition here
ZUO vs PAYO Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PAYO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while PAYO trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas PAYO's P/E ratio is 30.06. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to PAYO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to PAYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check PAYO's competition here
ZUO vs MQ Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MQ has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while MQ trades at $4.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas MQ's P/E ratio is -47.11. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to MQ's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to MQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check MQ's competition here
ZUO vs GSKY Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GSKY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while GSKY trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas GSKY's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to GSKY's ROE of +5.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to GSKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check GSKY's competition here
ZUO vs EVCM Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, EVCM has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while EVCM trades at $9.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas EVCM's P/E ratio is -129.00. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to EVCM's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to EVCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check EVCM's competition here
ZUO vs APPN Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, APPN has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while APPN trades at $24.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas APPN's P/E ratio is -251.80. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to APPN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to APPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check APPN's competition here
ZUO vs ODD Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ODD has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while ODD trades at $31.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas ODD's P/E ratio is 17.58. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to ODD's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to ODD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check ODD's competition here
ZUO vs EVTC Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, EVTC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while EVTC trades at $26.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas EVTC's P/E ratio is 12.19. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to EVTC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to EVTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check EVTC's competition here
ZUO vs GET Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while GET trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas GET's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to GET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to GET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check GET's competition here
ZUO vs STER Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, STER has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while STER trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas STER's P/E ratio is -98.47. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to STER's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is more volatile compared to STER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check STER's competition here
ZUO vs RAMP Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, RAMP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while RAMP trades at $24.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas RAMP's P/E ratio is 24.64. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to RAMP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to RAMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check RAMP's competition here
ZUO vs FIVN Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FIVN has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while FIVN trades at $17.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas FIVN's P/E ratio is 50.84. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to FIVN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to FIVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check FIVN's competition here
ZUO vs SUMO Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SUMO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while SUMO trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas SUMO's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to SUMO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is more volatile compared to SUMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check SUMO's competition here
ZUO vs GB Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while GB trades at $7.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas GB's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to GB's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is more volatile compared to GB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check GB's competition here
ZUO vs ATEN Comparison February 2026
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ATEN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while ATEN trades at $18.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas ATEN's P/E ratio is 35.05. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.44%, compared to ATEN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to ATEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.Check ATEN's competition here