Zuora, Inc.
Zuora, Inc. ZUO Peers
See (ZUO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZUO | $10.02 | +0.30% | 1.5B | -19.65 | -$0.51 | N/A |
| MSFT | $498.84 | +1.58% | 3.7T | 38.55 | $12.94 | +0.65% |
| ORCL | $237.32 | +3.19% | 666.6B | 54.56 | $4.35 | +0.72% |
| PLTR | $134.36 | +1.70% | 304B | 584.17 | $0.23 | N/A |
| ADBE | $379.31 | +0.22% | 161.7B | 24.31 | $15.60 | N/A |
| PANW | $201.82 | +2.46% | 134.6B | 115.99 | $1.74 | N/A |
| CRWD | $514.10 | +3.63% | 128.1B | -756.03 | -$0.68 | N/A |
| SNPS | $548.74 | +4.90% | 85.1B | 63.44 | $8.65 | N/A |
| HOOD | $94.40 | -3.65% | 83.3B | 53.94 | $1.75 | N/A |
| FTNT | $105.66 | +3.38% | 80.9B | 43.48 | $2.43 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ZUO vs MSFT Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MSFT has a market cap of 3.7T. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while MSFT trades at $498.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas MSFT's P/E ratio is 38.55. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to MSFT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to MSFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs ORCL Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ORCL has a market cap of 666.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while ORCL trades at $237.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas ORCL's P/E ratio is 54.56. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to ORCL's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to ORCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs PLTR Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PLTR has a market cap of 304B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while PLTR trades at $134.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas PLTR's P/E ratio is 584.17. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to PLTR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to PLTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs ADBE Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 161.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while ADBE trades at $379.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 24.31. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs PANW Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PANW has a market cap of 134.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while PANW trades at $201.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas PANW's P/E ratio is 115.99. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to PANW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to PANW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs CRWD Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CRWD has a market cap of 128.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while CRWD trades at $514.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas CRWD's P/E ratio is -756.03. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to CRWD's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to CRWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs SNPS Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SNPS has a market cap of 85.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while SNPS trades at $548.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas SNPS's P/E ratio is 63.44. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to SNPS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to SNPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs HOOD Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HOOD has a market cap of 83.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while HOOD trades at $94.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas HOOD's P/E ratio is 53.94. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to HOOD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to HOOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs FTNT Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FTNT has a market cap of 80.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while FTNT trades at $105.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas FTNT's P/E ratio is 43.48. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to FTNT's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to FTNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs CRWV Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CRWV has a market cap of 78.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while CRWV trades at $164.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas CRWV's P/E ratio is -64.97. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to CRWV's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to CRWV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs NET Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NET has a market cap of 66.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while NET trades at $191.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas NET's P/E ratio is -831.61. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to NET's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to NET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs VMW Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VMW has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while VMW trades at $142.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas VMW's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to VMW's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is more volatile compared to VMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs SQ Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SQ has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while SQ trades at $83.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas SQ's P/E ratio is 49.98. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to SQ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to SQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs ZS Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ZS has a market cap of 49B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while ZS trades at $314.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas ZS's P/E ratio is -1165.81. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to ZS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to ZS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs XYZ Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, XYZ has a market cap of 42.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while XYZ trades at $69.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas XYZ's P/E ratio is 16.80. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to XYZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to XYZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs NETE Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NETE has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while NETE trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas NETE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to NETE's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to NETE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs VRSN Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VRSN has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while VRSN trades at $286.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas VRSN's P/E ratio is 35.00. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to VRSN's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to VRSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs SPLK Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SPLK has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while SPLK trades at $156.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas SPLK's P/E ratio is 103.22. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to SPLK's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is more volatile compared to SPLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs GDDY Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GDDY has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while GDDY trades at $177.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas GDDY's P/E ratio is 34.17. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to GDDY's ROE of +2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to GDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs TOST Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TOST has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while TOST trades at $43.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas TOST's P/E ratio is 161.41. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to TOST's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to TOST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs CHKP Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CHKP has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while CHKP trades at $223.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas CHKP's P/E ratio is 29.54. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to CHKP's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to CHKP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs CPAY Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CPAY has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while CPAY trades at $339.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas CPAY's P/E ratio is 23.78. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to CPAY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to CPAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs AFRM Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AFRM has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while AFRM trades at $69.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas AFRM's P/E ratio is -364.16. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to AFRM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to AFRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs IOT Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, IOT has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while IOT trades at $39.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas IOT's P/E ratio is -177.77. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to IOT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to IOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs FLT Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FLT has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while FLT trades at $303.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas FLT's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to FLT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to FLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs NTNX Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NTNX has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while NTNX trades at $76.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas NTNX's P/E ratio is -295.38. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to NTNX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to NTNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs CYBR Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CYBR has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while CYBR trades at $398.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas CYBR's P/E ratio is -196.43. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to CYBR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to CYBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs GEN Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GEN has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while GEN trades at $30.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas GEN's P/E ratio is 29.60. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to GEN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to GEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs MDB Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MDB has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while MDB trades at $211.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas MDB's P/E ratio is -192.13. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to MDB's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to MDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs RBRK Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, RBRK has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while RBRK trades at $89.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas RBRK's P/E ratio is 25.67. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to RBRK's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to RBRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs FFIV Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FFIV has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while FFIV trades at $300.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas FFIV's P/E ratio is 28.53. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to FFIV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to FFIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs OKTA Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, OKTA has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while OKTA trades at $99.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas OKTA's P/E ratio is 152.48. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to OKTA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to OKTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs KSPI Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, KSPI has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while KSPI trades at $84.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas KSPI's P/E ratio is 7.89. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to KSPI's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to KSPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs NLOK Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NLOK has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while NLOK trades at $21.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas NLOK's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to NLOK's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to NLOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs SAIL Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SAIL has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while SAIL trades at $22.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas SAIL's P/E ratio is -13.60. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to SAIL's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to SAIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs AKAM Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AKAM has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while AKAM trades at $79.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas AKAM's P/E ratio is 26.67. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to AKAM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to AKAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs DOX Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, DOX has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while DOX trades at $92.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas DOX's P/E ratio is 19.45. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to DOX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to DOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs ALTR Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ALTR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while ALTR trades at $111.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas ALTR's P/E ratio is 699.06. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to ALTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is more volatile compared to ALTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs PLAN Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PLAN has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while PLAN trades at $63.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas PLAN's P/E ratio is -44.82. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to PLAN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is more volatile compared to PLAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs KVYO Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, KVYO has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while KVYO trades at $33.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas KVYO's P/E ratio is -199.47. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to KVYO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to KVYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs WIX Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, WIX has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while WIX trades at $164.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas WIX's P/E ratio is 65.19. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to WIX's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to WIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs FOUR Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FOUR has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while FOUR trades at $101.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas FOUR's P/E ratio is 34.86. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to FOUR's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to FOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs CFLT Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CFLT has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while CFLT trades at $26.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas CFLT's P/E ratio is -27.11. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to CFLT's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to CFLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs INFA Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, INFA has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while INFA trades at $24.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas INFA's P/E ratio is 813.67. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to INFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is more volatile compared to INFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs DBX Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, DBX has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while DBX trades at $28.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas DBX's P/E ratio is 18.42. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to DBX's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to DBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs HCP Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HCP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while HCP trades at $34.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas HCP's P/E ratio is -57.97. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to HCP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is more volatile compared to HCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs PATH Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PATH has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while PATH trades at $13.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas PATH's P/E ratio is -110.75. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to PATH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to PATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs JCOM Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, JCOM has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while JCOM trades at $142.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas JCOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to JCOM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to JCOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs SQSP Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SQSP has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while SQSP trades at $46.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas SQSP's P/E ratio is -1164.25. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to SQSP's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is more volatile compared to SQSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs CCCS Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CCCS has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while CCCS trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas CCCS's P/E ratio is 975.00. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to CCCS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to CCCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs NEWR Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NEWR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while NEWR trades at $86.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas NEWR's P/E ratio is -41.62. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to NEWR's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is more volatile compared to NEWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs S Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, S has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while S trades at $18.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas S's P/E ratio is -13.98. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to S's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to S. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs VRNS Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VRNS has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while VRNS trades at $51.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas VRNS's P/E ratio is -63.15. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to VRNS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to VRNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs QLYS Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, QLYS has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while QLYS trades at $150.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas QLYS's P/E ratio is 30.69. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to QLYS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to QLYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs SPSC Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SPSC has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while SPSC trades at $141.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas SPSC's P/E ratio is 65.75. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to SPSC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to SPSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs CORZ Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CORZ has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while CORZ trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas CORZ's P/E ratio is -4.59. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to CORZ's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to CORZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs CORZZ Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CORZZ has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while CORZZ trades at $17.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas CORZZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to CORZZ's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to CORZZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs WEX Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, WEX has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while WEX trades at $151.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas WEX's P/E ratio is 19.49. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to WEX's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to WEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs ACIW Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ACIW has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while ACIW trades at $46.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas ACIW's P/E ratio is 18.26. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to ACIW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to ACIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs NVEI Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NVEI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while NVEI trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas NVEI's P/E ratio is 212.44. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to NVEI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is more volatile compared to NVEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs BOX Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while BOX trades at $33.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 25.58. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to BOX's ROE of +1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to BOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs EEFT Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, EEFT has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while EEFT trades at $106.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas EEFT's P/E ratio is 15.79. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to EEFT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to EEFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs STNE Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, STNE has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while STNE trades at $16.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas STNE's P/E ratio is -20.22. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to STNE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to STNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs ODD Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ODD has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while ODD trades at $75.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas ODD's P/E ratio is 43.66. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to ODD's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to ODD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs TENB Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TENB has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while TENB trades at $34.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas TENB's P/E ratio is -89.66. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to TENB's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to TENB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs ESMT Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ESMT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while ESMT trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas ESMT's P/E ratio is 153.67. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to ESMT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is more volatile compared to ESMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs AVPT Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AVPT has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while AVPT trades at $18.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas AVPT's P/E ratio is -145.08. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to AVPT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to AVPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs RELY Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, RELY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while RELY trades at $18.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas RELY's P/E ratio is -616.67. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to RELY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to RELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs CLBT Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CLBT has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while CLBT trades at $15.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas CLBT's P/E ratio is -16.79. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to CLBT's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to CLBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs CORZW Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CORZW has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while CORZW trades at $11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas CORZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to CORZW's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to CORZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs DLO Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, DLO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while DLO trades at $11.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas DLO's P/E ratio is 23.85. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to DLO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to DLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs SWI Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SWI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while SWI trades at $18.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas SWI's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to SWI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is more volatile compared to SWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs PAGS Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PAGS has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while PAGS trades at $9.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas PAGS's P/E ratio is 7.65. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to PAGS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to PAGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs EVOP Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, EVOP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while EVOP trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas EVOP's P/E ratio is -309.00. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to EVOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is more volatile compared to EVOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs MQ Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MQ has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while MQ trades at $5.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas MQ's P/E ratio is 59.50. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to MQ's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to MQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs DOCN Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, DOCN has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while DOCN trades at $29.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas DOCN's P/E ratio is 25.84. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to DOCN's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to DOCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs BB Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BB has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while BB trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas BB's P/E ratio is 217.50. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to BB's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to BB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs PAYO Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PAYO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while PAYO trades at $6.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas PAYO's P/E ratio is 24.93. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to PAYO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to PAYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs EVTC Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, EVTC has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while EVTC trades at $37.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas EVTC's P/E ratio is 18.85. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to EVTC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to EVTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs WRD Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, WRD has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while WRD trades at $8.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas WRD's P/E ratio is -6.84. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to WRD's ROE of +4.97%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to WRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs APPN Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, APPN has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while APPN trades at $30.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas APPN's P/E ratio is -36.72. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to APPN's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to APPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs TDC Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TDC has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while TDC trades at $23.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas TDC's P/E ratio is 16.46. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to TDC's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to TDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs RAMP Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, RAMP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while RAMP trades at $33.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas RAMP's P/E ratio is -838.75. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to RAMP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to RAMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs FIVN Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FIVN has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while FIVN trades at $27.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas FIVN's P/E ratio is -461.83. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to FIVN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to FIVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs GETVV Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GETVV has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while GETVV trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas GETVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to GETVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to GETVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs AVDX Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AVDX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while AVDX trades at $9.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas AVDX's P/E ratio is 246.25. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to AVDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is more volatile compared to AVDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs EVCM Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, EVCM has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while EVCM trades at $10.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas EVCM's P/E ratio is -90.58. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to EVCM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to EVCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs FORG Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FORG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while FORG trades at $23.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas FORG's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to FORG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to FORG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs CSGS Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CSGS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while CSGS trades at $66.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas CSGS's P/E ratio is 22.62. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to CSGS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to CSGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs GSKY Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GSKY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while GSKY trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas GSKY's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to GSKY's ROE of +5.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to GSKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs NTCT Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NTCT has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while NTCT trades at $24.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas NTCT's P/E ratio is -4.85. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to NTCT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to NTCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs GET Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while GET trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas GET's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to GET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to GET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs PGY Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PGY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while PGY trades at $22.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas PGY's P/E ratio is -4.24. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to PGY's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to PGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs STER Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, STER has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while STER trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas STER's P/E ratio is -98.47. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to STER's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is more volatile compared to STER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs RPD Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, RPD has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while RPD trades at $24.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas RPD's P/E ratio is 59.44. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to RPD's ROE of +9.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to RPD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs TUYA Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TUYA has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while TUYA trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas TUYA's P/E ratio is 61.25. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to TUYA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to TUYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs AVPTW Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AVPTW has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while AVPTW trades at $7.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas AVPTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to AVPTW's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is less volatile compared to AVPTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs SUMO Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SUMO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while SUMO trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas SUMO's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to SUMO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is more volatile compared to SUMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.
ZUO vs GB Comparison
ZUO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZUO stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZUO is priced at $10.02, while GB trades at $7.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZUO currently has a P/E ratio of -19.65, whereas GB's P/E ratio is 18.67. In terms of profitability, ZUO's ROE is -0.46%, compared to GB's ROE of +0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, ZUO is more volatile compared to GB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZUO.