Zscaler, Inc.
Zscaler, Inc. (ZS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ZS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZS | $146.13 | -13.53% | 25.5B | -639.00 | -$0.25 | N/A |
| MSFT | $387.85 | -2.66% | 2.9T | 24.86 | $15.98 | +0.88% |
| ORCL | $140.84 | -10.03% | 425.7B | 27.79 | $5.33 | +1.35% |
| PLTR | $129.46 | -4.03% | 308.9B | 211.31 | $0.64 | N/A |
| ADBE | $246.78 | -4.80% | 108.3B | 15.49 | $16.69 | N/A |
| PANW | $146.44 | -3.02% | 103.6B | 94.71 | $1.57 | N/A |
| CRWD | $352.83 | -16.42% | 98B | -301.24 | -$1.29 | N/A |
| SNPS | $422.58 | -4.49% | 84.2B | 54.61 | $8.06 | N/A |
| NET | $167.71 | -12.94% | 62.4B | -611.08 | -$0.29 | N/A |
| VMW | $142.48 | -4.96% | 61.5B | 42.92 | $3.32 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ZS vs MSFT Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, MSFT has a market cap of 2.9T. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while MSFT trades at $387.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas MSFT's P/E ratio is 24.86. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MSFT's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to MSFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check MSFT's competition here
ZS vs ORCL Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, ORCL has a market cap of 425.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while ORCL trades at $140.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas ORCL's P/E ratio is 27.79. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ORCL's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to ORCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check ORCL's competition here
ZS vs PLTR Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, PLTR has a market cap of 308.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while PLTR trades at $129.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas PLTR's P/E ratio is 211.31. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PLTR's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to PLTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check PLTR's competition here
ZS vs ADBE Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 108.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while ADBE trades at $246.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 15.49. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check ADBE's competition here
ZS vs PANW Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, PANW has a market cap of 103.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while PANW trades at $146.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas PANW's P/E ratio is 94.71. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PANW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to PANW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check PANW's competition here
ZS vs CRWD Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, CRWD has a market cap of 98B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while CRWD trades at $352.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas CRWD's P/E ratio is -301.24. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CRWD's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is less volatile compared to CRWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check CRWD's competition here
ZS vs SNPS Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, SNPS has a market cap of 84.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while SNPS trades at $422.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas SNPS's P/E ratio is 54.61. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SNPS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to SNPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check SNPS's competition here
ZS vs NET Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, NET has a market cap of 62.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while NET trades at $167.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas NET's P/E ratio is -611.08. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NET's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to NET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check NET's competition here
ZS vs VMW Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, VMW has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while VMW trades at $142.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas VMW's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VMW's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to VMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check VMW's competition here
ZS vs FTNT Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, FTNT has a market cap of 61.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while FTNT trades at $76.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas FTNT's P/E ratio is 33.06. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FTNT's ROE of +1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to FTNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check FTNT's competition here
ZS vs SQ Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, SQ has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while SQ trades at $83.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas SQ's P/E ratio is 49.98. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SQ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to SQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check SQ's competition here
ZS vs CRWV Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, CRWV has a market cap of 44.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while CRWV trades at $91.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas CRWV's P/E ratio is -53.77. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CRWV's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to CRWV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check CRWV's competition here
ZS vs XYZ Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, XYZ has a market cap of 32.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while XYZ trades at $50.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas XYZ's P/E ratio is 10.71. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to XYZ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to XYZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check XYZ's competition here
ZS vs MDB Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, MDB has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while MDB trades at $316.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas MDB's P/E ratio is -420.20. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MDB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to MDB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check MDB's competition here
ZS vs NETE Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, NETE has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while NETE trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas NETE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NETE's ROE of +3.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is less volatile compared to NETE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check NETE's competition here
ZS vs SPLK Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, SPLK has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while SPLK trades at $156.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas SPLK's P/E ratio is 103.22. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SPLK's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to SPLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check SPLK's competition here
ZS vs CPAY Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, CPAY has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while CPAY trades at $337.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas CPAY's P/E ratio is 23.48. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CPAY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to CPAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check CPAY's competition here
ZS vs FLT Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, FLT has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while FLT trades at $303.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas FLT's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FLT's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to FLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check FLT's competition here
ZS vs CYBR Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, CYBR has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while CYBR trades at $408.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas CYBR's P/E ratio is -139.06. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CYBR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to CYBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check CYBR's competition here
ZS vs VRSN Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, VRSN has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while VRSN trades at $212.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas VRSN's P/E ratio is 24.54. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VRSN's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to VRSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check VRSN's competition here
ZS vs CHKP Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, CHKP has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while CHKP trades at $156.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas CHKP's P/E ratio is 16.53. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CHKP's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to CHKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check CHKP's competition here
ZS vs AFRM Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, AFRM has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while AFRM trades at $48.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas AFRM's P/E ratio is 63.05. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AFRM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to AFRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check AFRM's competition here
ZS vs TOST Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, TOST has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while TOST trades at $25.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas TOST's P/E ratio is 48.32. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TOST's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to TOST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check TOST's competition here
ZS vs FFIV Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, FFIV has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while FFIV trades at $270.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas FFIV's P/E ratio is 23.03. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FFIV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to FFIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check FFIV's competition here
ZS vs IOT Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, IOT has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while IOT trades at $25.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas IOT's P/E ratio is -382.71. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IOT's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to IOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check IOT's competition here
ZS vs NLOK Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, NLOK has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while NLOK trades at $21.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas NLOK's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NLOK's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to NLOK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check NLOK's competition here
ZS vs KSPI Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, KSPI has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while KSPI trades at $72.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas KSPI's P/E ratio is 6.34. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to KSPI's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to KSPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check KSPI's competition here
ZS vs GEN Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, GEN has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while GEN trades at $21.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas GEN's P/E ratio is 23.04. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GEN's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to GEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check GEN's competition here
ZS vs AKAM Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, AKAM has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while AKAM trades at $98.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas AKAM's P/E ratio is 27.67. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AKAM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to AKAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check AKAM's competition here
ZS vs OKTA Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, OKTA has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while OKTA trades at $71.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas OKTA's P/E ratio is 67.54. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to OKTA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to OKTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check OKTA's competition here
ZS vs GDDY Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, GDDY has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while GDDY trades at $87.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas GDDY's P/E ratio is 15.62. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GDDY's ROE of +2.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to GDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check GDDY's competition here
ZS vs CFLT Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, CFLT has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while CFLT trades at $30.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas CFLT's P/E ratio is -35.70. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CFLT's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to CFLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check CFLT's competition here
ZS vs NTNX Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, NTNX has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while NTNX trades at $38.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas NTNX's P/E ratio is 52.42. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NTNX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to NTNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check NTNX's competition here
ZS vs RBRK Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, RBRK has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while RBRK trades at $47.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas RBRK's P/E ratio is -32.41. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RBRK's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to RBRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check RBRK's competition here
ZS vs ALTR Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, ALTR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while ALTR trades at $111.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas ALTR's P/E ratio is 699.06. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ALTR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to ALTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check ALTR's competition here
ZS vs PLAN Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, PLAN has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while PLAN trades at $63.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas PLAN's P/E ratio is -44.82. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PLAN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to PLAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check PLAN's competition here
ZS vs SAIL Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, SAIL has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while SAIL trades at $13.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas SAIL's P/E ratio is -12.23. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SAIL's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to SAIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check SAIL's competition here
ZS vs DOX Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, DOX has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while DOX trades at $68.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas DOX's P/E ratio is 13.57. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DOX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to DOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check DOX's competition here
ZS vs INFA Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, INFA has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while INFA trades at $24.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas INFA's P/E ratio is 826.33. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to INFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to INFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check INFA's competition here
ZS vs DBX Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, DBX has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while DBX trades at $24.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas DBX's P/E ratio is 14.48. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DBX's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to DBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check DBX's competition here
ZS vs HCP Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, HCP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while HCP trades at $34.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas HCP's P/E ratio is -57.97. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HCP's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to HCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check HCP's competition here
ZS vs JCOM Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, JCOM has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while JCOM trades at $142.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas JCOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to JCOM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to JCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check JCOM's competition here
ZS vs SQSP Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, SQSP has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while SQSP trades at $46.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas SQSP's P/E ratio is -1164.25. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SQSP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to SQSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check SQSP's competition here
ZS vs NEWR Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, NEWR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while NEWR trades at $86.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas NEWR's P/E ratio is -41.62. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NEWR's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to NEWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check NEWR's competition here
ZS vs DOCN Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, DOCN has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while DOCN trades at $58.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas DOCN's P/E ratio is 25.46. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DOCN's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is less volatile compared to DOCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check DOCN's competition here
ZS vs PATH Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, PATH has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while PATH trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas PATH's P/E ratio is 25.69. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PATH's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to PATH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check PATH's competition here
ZS vs CCCS Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, CCCS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while CCCS trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas CCCS's P/E ratio is -875.00. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CCCS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to CCCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check CCCS's competition here
ZS vs WEX Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, WEX has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while WEX trades at $151.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas WEX's P/E ratio is 18.59. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WEX's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to WEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check WEX's competition here
ZS vs CORZ Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, CORZ has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while CORZ trades at $16.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas CORZ's P/E ratio is -7.69. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CORZ's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to CORZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check CORZ's competition here
ZS vs CORZZ Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, CORZZ has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while CORZZ trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas CORZZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CORZZ's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to CORZZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check CORZZ's competition here
ZS vs KVYO Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, KVYO has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while KVYO trades at $15.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas KVYO's P/E ratio is -157.41. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to KVYO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is less volatile compared to KVYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check KVYO's competition here
ZS vs FOUR Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, FOUR has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while FOUR trades at $57.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas FOUR's P/E ratio is 27.34. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FOUR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to FOUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check FOUR's competition here
ZS vs KLAR Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, KLAR has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while KLAR trades at $12.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas KLAR's P/E ratio is -43.60. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to KLAR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to KLAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check KLAR's competition here
ZS vs NVEI Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, NVEI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while NVEI trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas NVEI's P/E ratio is 212.44. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NVEI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to NVEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check NVEI's competition here
ZS vs BLSH Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, BLSH has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while BLSH trades at $30.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas BLSH's P/E ratio is -5.17. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BLSH's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to BLSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check BLSH's competition here
ZS vs STNE Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, STNE has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while STNE trades at $16.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas STNE's P/E ratio is -28.60. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to STNE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to STNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check STNE's competition here
ZS vs S Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, S has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while S trades at $12.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas S's P/E ratio is -10.31. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to S's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to S. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check S's competition here
ZS vs ACIW Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, ACIW has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while ACIW trades at $38.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas ACIW's P/E ratio is 16.55. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ACIW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to ACIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check ACIW's competition here
ZS vs ESMT Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, ESMT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while ESMT trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas ESMT's P/E ratio is 153.67. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ESMT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to ESMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check ESMT's competition here
ZS vs DLO Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, DLO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while DLO trades at $12.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas DLO's P/E ratio is 23.91. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DLO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to DLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check DLO's competition here
ZS vs WIX Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, WIX has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while WIX trades at $64.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas WIX's P/E ratio is 28.35. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WIX's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to WIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check WIX's competition here
ZS vs RELY Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, RELY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while RELY trades at $16.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas RELY's P/E ratio is 190.56. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RELY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to RELY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check RELY's competition here
ZS vs PAGS Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, PAGS has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while PAGS trades at $10.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas PAGS's P/E ratio is 8.07. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PAGS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to PAGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check PAGS's competition here
ZS vs CORZW Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, CORZW has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while CORZW trades at $10.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas CORZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CORZW's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is less volatile compared to CORZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check CORZW's competition here
ZS vs QLYS Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, QLYS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while QLYS trades at $86.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas QLYS's P/E ratio is 17.03. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to QLYS's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to QLYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check QLYS's competition here
ZS vs BOX Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while BOX trades at $21.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 18.30. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BOX's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to BOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check BOX's competition here
ZS vs CCC Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, CCC has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while CCC trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas CCC's P/E ratio is -509.00. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CCC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to CCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check CCC's competition here
ZS vs CLBT Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, CLBT has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while CLBT trades at $12.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas CLBT's P/E ratio is 42.45. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CLBT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to CLBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check CLBT's competition here
ZS vs SWI Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, SWI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while SWI trades at $18.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas SWI's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SWI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to SWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check SWI's competition here
ZS vs EEFT Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, EEFT has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while EEFT trades at $70.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas EEFT's P/E ratio is 10.60. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EEFT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to EEFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check EEFT's competition here
ZS vs EVOP Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, EVOP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while EVOP trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas EVOP's P/E ratio is -309.00. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EVOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to EVOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check EVOP's competition here
ZS vs TDC Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, TDC has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while TDC trades at $28.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas TDC's P/E ratio is 22.90. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TDC's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is less volatile compared to TDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check TDC's competition here
ZS vs VRNS Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, VRNS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while VRNS trades at $22.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas VRNS's P/E ratio is -20.96. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VRNS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to VRNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check VRNS's competition here
ZS vs TENB Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, TENB has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while TENB trades at $17.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas TENB's P/E ratio is -66.37. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TENB's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is less volatile compared to TENB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check TENB's competition here
ZS vs CSGS Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, CSGS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while CSGS trades at $79.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas CSGS's P/E ratio is 40.37. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CSGS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to CSGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check CSGS's competition here
ZS vs AVPT Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, AVPT has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while AVPT trades at $10.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas AVPT's P/E ratio is -1050.00. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AVPT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to AVPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check AVPT's competition here
ZS vs SPSC Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, SPSC has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while SPSC trades at $55.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas SPSC's P/E ratio is 23.56. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SPSC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to SPSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check SPSC's competition here
ZS vs NTCT Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, NTCT has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while NTCT trades at $28.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas NTCT's P/E ratio is 22.33. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NTCT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to NTCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check NTCT's competition here
ZS vs AVDX Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, AVDX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while AVDX trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas AVDX's P/E ratio is -250.00. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AVDX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to AVDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check AVDX's competition here
ZS vs GETVV Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, GETVV has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while GETVV trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas GETVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GETVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is less volatile compared to GETVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check GETVV's competition here
ZS vs WRD Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, WRD has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while WRD trades at $7.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas WRD's P/E ratio is -9.09. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WRD's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to WRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check WRD's competition here
ZS vs BB Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, BB has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while BB trades at $3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas BB's P/E ratio is 85.88. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to BB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check BB's competition here
ZS vs PICS Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, PICS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while PICS trades at $15.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas PICS's P/E ratio is 31.00. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PICS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to PICS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check PICS's competition here
ZS vs FORG Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, FORG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while FORG trades at $23.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas FORG's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FORG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is less volatile compared to FORG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check FORG's competition here
ZS vs PAYO Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, PAYO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while PAYO trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas PAYO's P/E ratio is 30.06. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PAYO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to PAYO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check PAYO's competition here
ZS vs MQ Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, MQ has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while MQ trades at $4.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas MQ's P/E ratio is -47.11. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MQ's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to MQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check MQ's competition here
ZS vs GSKY Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, GSKY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while GSKY trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas GSKY's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GSKY's ROE of +5.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to GSKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check GSKY's competition here
ZS vs EVCM Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, EVCM has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while EVCM trades at $10.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas EVCM's P/E ratio is -129.00. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EVCM's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to EVCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check EVCM's competition here
ZS vs APPN Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, APPN has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while APPN trades at $24.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas APPN's P/E ratio is -251.80. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to APPN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to APPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check APPN's competition here
ZS vs ODD Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, ODD has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while ODD trades at $31.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas ODD's P/E ratio is 17.58. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ODD's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to ODD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check ODD's competition here
ZS vs EVTC Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, EVTC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while EVTC trades at $26.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas EVTC's P/E ratio is 12.19. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EVTC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to EVTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check EVTC's competition here
ZS vs GET Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, GET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while GET trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas GET's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to GET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check GET's competition here
ZS vs STER Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, STER has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while STER trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas STER's P/E ratio is -98.47. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to STER's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to STER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check STER's competition here
ZS vs RAMP Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, RAMP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while RAMP trades at $24.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas RAMP's P/E ratio is 24.64. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RAMP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to RAMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check RAMP's competition here
ZS vs ZUO Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, ZUO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while ZUO trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas ZUO's P/E ratio is -19.65. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ZUO's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to ZUO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check ZUO's competition here
ZS vs FIVN Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, FIVN has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while FIVN trades at $18.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas FIVN's P/E ratio is 50.84. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FIVN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to FIVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check FIVN's competition here
ZS vs SUMO Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, SUMO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while SUMO trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas SUMO's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SUMO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to SUMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check SUMO's competition here
ZS vs GB Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, GB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while GB trades at $7.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas GB's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GB's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to GB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check GB's competition here
ZS vs ATEN Comparison February 2026
ZS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZS stands at 25.5B. In comparison, ATEN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZS is priced at $146.13, while ATEN trades at $19.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZS currently has a P/E ratio of -639.00, whereas ATEN's P/E ratio is 35.05. In terms of profitability, ZS's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ATEN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ZS is more volatile compared to ATEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZS.Check ATEN's competition here