Workiva Inc.
Workiva Inc. WK Peers
See (WK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WK | $67.11 | -0.61% | 3.74B | -57.85 | -$1.16 | N/A |
| SAP | $294.84 | -1.67% | 343.96B | 54.00 | $5.46 | +0.71% |
| CRM | $273.09 | -3.64% | 262.02B | 43.01 | $6.35 | +0.58% |
| NOW | $1,004.76 | -1.08% | 207.99B | 135.60 | $7.41 | N/A |
| INTU | $720.03 | +8.10% | 201.29B | 58.73 | $12.26 | +0.56% |
| UBER | $87.75 | -0.28% | 183.50B | 15.37 | $5.71 | N/A |
| SHOP | $101.56 | -1.68% | 131.27B | 82.57 | $1.23 | N/A |
| APP | $354.29 | +0.80% | 120.00B | 64.18 | $5.52 | N/A |
| MSTR | $369.51 | -7.50% | 100.65B | -16.62 | -$22.23 | N/A |
| CDNS | $315.51 | -0.35% | 86.15B | 80.28 | $3.93 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
WK vs SAP Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 343.96B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while SAP trades at $294.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 54.00. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs CRM Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 262.02B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while CRM trades at $273.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 43.01. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is less volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs NOW Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 207.99B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while NOW trades at $1,004.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 135.60. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is more volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs INTU Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 201.29B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while INTU trades at $720.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 58.73. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is more volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs UBER Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 183.50B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while UBER trades at $87.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 15.37. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is more volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs SHOP Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 131.27B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while SHOP trades at $101.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 82.57. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is more volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs APP Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 120.00B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while APP trades at $354.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 64.18. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is less volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs MSTR Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 100.65B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while MSTR trades at $369.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -16.62. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is less volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs CDNS Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 86.15B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while CDNS trades at $315.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 80.28. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is more volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs SNOW Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 66.68B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while SNOW trades at $199.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is -47.48. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is less volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs WDAY Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 63.70B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while WDAY trades at $238.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 132.23. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is less volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs ADSK Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 63.19B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while ADSK trades at $295.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 63.38. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is less volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs TEAM Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 54.42B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while TEAM trades at $206.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is -125.30. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is more volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs FICO Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 41.25B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while FICO trades at $1,694.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 72.96. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is less volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs DDOG Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 39.53B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while DDOG trades at $114.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 243.53. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is more volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs TTD Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, TTD has a market cap of 36.31B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while TTD trades at $73.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas TTD's P/E ratio is 90.11. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to TTD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is less volatile compared to TTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs HUBS Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 32.40B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while HUBS trades at $614.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is -1428.83. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to HUBS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is more volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs ANSS Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 30.08B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while ANSS trades at $342.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 50.62. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs STRK Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 25.64B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while STRK trades at $101.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is more volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs TYL Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 24.42B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while TYL trades at $566.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 85.40. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is more volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs STRF Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 24.36B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while STRF trades at $100.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is more volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs ZM Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 24.19B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while ZM trades at $79.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is less volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs DUOL Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 23.65B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while DUOL trades at $520.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 258.81. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is more volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs PTC Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 20.24B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while PTC trades at $168.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 46.37. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is more volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs SSNC Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 19.68B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while SSNC trades at $79.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 24.78. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs GRAB Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 19.54B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while GRAB trades at $4.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 494.00. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is more volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs GWRE Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 17.61B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while GWRE trades at $209.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is -1105.21. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to GWRE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is more volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs DOCU Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 17.13B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while DOCU trades at $84.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 16.66. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is more volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs AZPN Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.73B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while AZPN trades at $264.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to AZPN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs DT Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 15.94B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while DT trades at $53.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 33.50. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is more volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs PAYC Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 14.90B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while PAYC trades at $257.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 36.72. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is more volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs MNDY Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 14.64B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while MNDY trades at $288.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 285.51. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is more volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs BSY Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 13.84B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while BSY trades at $47.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 60.79. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is more volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs BKI Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.88B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while BKI trades at $75.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs MANH Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 11.25B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while MANH trades at $185.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 52.92. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is more volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs TTAN Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 11.11B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while TTAN trades at $122.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is -14.37. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is less volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs XM Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11.01B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while XM trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs CDAY Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.85B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while CDAY trades at $69.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to CDAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is more volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs PCTY Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 10.76B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while PCTY trades at $194.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 48.59. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is more volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs NICE Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 10.12B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while NICE trades at $159.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 22.28. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is more volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs PCOR Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 10.04B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while PCOR trades at $67.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is -78.26. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is less volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs DSGX Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 9.82B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while DSGX trades at $114.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 69.67. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is more volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs ESTC Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 9.63B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while ESTC trades at $92.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is -70.42. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to ESTC's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is less volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs DAY Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 9.15B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while DAY trades at $57.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is 357.69. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to DAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is more volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs QXO Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, QXO has a market cap of 8.79B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while QXO trades at $16.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas QXO's P/E ratio is -48.06. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to QXO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is more volatile compared to QXO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs U Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, U has a market cap of 8.63B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while U trades at $20.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas U's P/E ratio is -18.54. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to U's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is more volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs PEGA Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 8.22B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while PEGA trades at $96.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 44.46. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is less volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs NATI Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 7.97B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while NATI trades at $59.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs SMAR Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.91B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while SMAR trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs GTLB Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 7.85B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while GTLB trades at $47.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is -1187.50. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to GTLB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is less volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs CVLT Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 7.70B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while CVLT trades at $174.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 104.45. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is less volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs APPF Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 7.56B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while APPF trades at $209.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 39.15. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is more volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs SRAD Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 7.43B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while SRAD trades at $23.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 125.74. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is more volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs OTEX Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 7.24B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while OTEX trades at $27.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 11.45. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is more volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs LYFT Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 6.63B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while LYFT trades at $16.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 107.33. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is less volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs CWAN Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 6.24B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while CWAN trades at $22.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is 12.96. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to CWAN's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is more volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs COUP Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.12B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while COUP trades at $80.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to COUP's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs VERX Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, VERX has a market cap of 6.01B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while VERX trades at $37.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas VERX's P/E ratio is -130.83. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to VERX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is more volatile compared to VERX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs SYT Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, SYT has a market cap of 5.68B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while SYT trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas SYT's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to SYT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is less volatile compared to SYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs BULL Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 5.67B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while BULL trades at $12.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is -10.88. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to BULL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is less volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs ETWO-WT Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, ETWO-WT has a market cap of 5.51B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while ETWO-WT trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas ETWO-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to ETWO-WT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is less volatile compared to ETWO-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs IDCC Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 5.51B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while IDCC trades at $212.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 16.81. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is more volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs QTWO Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 5.40B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while QTWO trades at $86.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is -254.74. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to QTWO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is more volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs FROG Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 4.87B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while FROG trades at $42.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is -59.85. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is more volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs GRND Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, GRND has a market cap of 4.70B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while GRND trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas GRND's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to GRND's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is more volatile compared to GRND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs LIF Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 4.70B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while LIF trades at $61.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 472.00. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to LIF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is less volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs BILL Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 4.58B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while BILL trades at $44.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is -2220.50. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is less volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs INTA Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, INTA has a market cap of 4.42B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while INTA trades at $54.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas INTA's P/E ratio is -227.42. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to INTA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is more volatile compared to INTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs FRSH Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, FRSH has a market cap of 4.25B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while FRSH trades at $14.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas FRSH's P/E ratio is -60.08. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to FRSH's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is more volatile compared to FRSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs CVT Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.19B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while CVT trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs ASAN Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, ASAN has a market cap of 4.11B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while ASAN trades at $17.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas ASAN's P/E ratio is -15.73. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to ASAN's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is less volatile compared to ASAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs PYCR Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.09B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while PYCR trades at $22.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs RUM Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 3.98B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while RUM trades at $9.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -6.27. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to RUM's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is less volatile compared to RUM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs SOUN Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, SOUN has a market cap of 3.85B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while SOUN trades at $9.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas SOUN's P/E ratio is -15.70. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to SOUN's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is less volatile compared to SOUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs PWSC Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.80B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while PWSC trades at $22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs ZI Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.77B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while ZI trades at $10.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 85.92. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is less volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs RUMBW Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, RUMBW has a market cap of 3.75B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while RUMBW trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas RUMBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to RUMBW's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is less volatile compared to RUMBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs BRZE Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, BRZE has a market cap of 3.75B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while BRZE trades at $34.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas BRZE's P/E ratio is -34.05. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to BRZE's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is less volatile compared to BRZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs AYX Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.53B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while AYX trades at $48.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs ENV Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.49B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while ENV trades at $63.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs INST Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.46B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while INST trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs BL Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, BL has a market cap of 3.38B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while BL trades at $54.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas BL's P/E ratio is 39.25. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to BL's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is more volatile compared to BL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs COMP Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 3.11B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while COMP trades at $5.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is -45.92. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to COMP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is less volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs ZETA Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 3.08B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while ZETA trades at $13.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is -52.32. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is less volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs RIOT Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, RIOT has a market cap of 3.05B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while RIOT trades at $8.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas RIOT's P/E ratio is -6.24. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to RIOT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is less volatile compared to RIOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs CALX Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, CALX has a market cap of 3.03B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while CALX trades at $46.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas CALX's P/E ratio is -89.87. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to CALX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is more volatile compared to CALX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs NCNO Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, NCNO has a market cap of 3.03B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while NCNO trades at $26.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas NCNO's P/E ratio is -79.58. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to NCNO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is more volatile compared to NCNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs ALKT Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, ALKT has a market cap of 2.99B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while ALKT trades at $29.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas ALKT's P/E ratio is -78.43. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to ALKT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is less volatile compared to ALKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs BLKB Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, BLKB has a market cap of 2.97B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while BLKB trades at $61.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas BLKB's P/E ratio is -10.91. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to BLKB's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is more volatile compared to BLKB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs GBTG Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 2.87B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while GBTG trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is -59.95. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to GBTG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is more volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs ALIT Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, ALIT has a market cap of 2.84B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while ALIT trades at $5.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas ALIT's P/E ratio is -89.75. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to ALIT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is more volatile compared to ALIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs AGYS Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, AGYS has a market cap of 2.84B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while AGYS trades at $101.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas AGYS's P/E ratio is 123.91. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to AGYS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is more volatile compared to AGYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs BTDR Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, BTDR has a market cap of 2.84B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while BTDR trades at $14.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas BTDR's P/E ratio is -3.05. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to BTDR's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is less volatile compared to BTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs ALRM Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, ALRM has a market cap of 2.81B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while ALRM trades at $56.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas ALRM's P/E ratio is 23.84. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to ALRM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is more volatile compared to ALRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs PAR Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, PAR has a market cap of 2.67B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while PAR trades at $65.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas PAR's P/E ratio is -25.86. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to PAR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is more volatile compared to PAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs DAVE Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 2.63B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while DAVE trades at $197.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 55.43. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is less volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs CLSK Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, CLSK has a market cap of 2.63B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while CLSK trades at $9.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas CLSK's P/E ratio is -8.43. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to CLSK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is less volatile compared to CLSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs PRGS Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, PRGS has a market cap of 2.63B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while PRGS trades at $61.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas PRGS's P/E ratio is 48.09. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to PRGS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is more volatile compared to PRGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.
WK vs DCT Comparison
WK plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WK stands at 3.74B. In comparison, DCT has a market cap of 2.52B. Regarding current trading prices, WK is priced at $67.11, while DCT trades at $18.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WK currently has a P/E ratio of -57.85, whereas DCT's P/E ratio is -172.64. In terms of profitability, WK's ROE is +1.05%, compared to DCT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WK is more volatile compared to DCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WK.