OneStream, Inc. Class A Common Stock

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 197.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while SAP trades at $169.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 23.18. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check SAP's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 167.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while CRM trades at $176.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 22.63. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check CRM's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 157.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while SHOP trades at $121.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 128.86. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check SHOP's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 153.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while UBER trades at $74.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 15.77. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check UBER's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 150B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while APP trades at $446.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 44.34. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.49%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check APP's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 108.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while INTU trades at $388.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 25.28. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check INTU's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 91.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while NOW trades at $88.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 52.57. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check NOW's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 91B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while CDNS trades at $329.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 76.83. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check CDNS's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 50B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while ADSK trades at $237.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 45.23. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check ADSK's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 47.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while SNOW trades at $136.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is -34.62. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check SNOW's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 46.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while DDOG trades at $132.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 426.42. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check DDOG's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 45.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while MSTR trades at $165.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -10.86. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check MSTR's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while ANSS trades at $374.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 55.53. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OS and ANSS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ANSS's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while WDAY trades at $122.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 47.24. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check WDAY's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, GTOP has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while GTOP trades at $43.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas GTOP's P/E ratio is 39.70. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GTOP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to GTOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check GTOP's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while ZM trades at $97.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 15.72. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check ZM's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while STRF trades at $100.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check STRF's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, STRC has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while STRC trades at $99.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas STRC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to STRC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to STRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check STRC's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while FICO trades at $1,025.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 32.52. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check FICO's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while STRK trades at $78.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check STRK's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, BVC has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while BVC trades at $10.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas BVC's P/E ratio is -160.71. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BVC's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to BVC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check BVC's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while TEAM trades at $68.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is -95.26. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check TEAM's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while SSNC trades at $69.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check SSNC's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while AZPN trades at $264.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to AZPN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check AZPN's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while PTC trades at $136.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 20.08. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check PTC's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while GRAB trades at $3.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 63.75. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check GRAB's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while TYL trades at $341.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 47.21. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check TYL's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while BKI trades at $75.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check BKI's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while GWRE trades at $138.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 62.64. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check GWRE's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while HUBS trades at $221.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is 257.78. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to HUBS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check HUBS's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, U has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while U trades at $26.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas U's P/E ratio is -27.52. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to U's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check U's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, TTD has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while TTD trades at $23.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas TTD's P/E ratio is 26.22. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TTD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to TTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check TTD's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while DAY trades at $69.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is -73.54. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check DAY's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while XM trades at $18.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check XM's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while DT trades at $36.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 60.33. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check DT's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while CDAY trades at $69.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CDAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check CDAY's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while BSY trades at $32.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 38.38. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check BSY's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, YMM has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while YMM trades at $8.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas YMM's P/E ratio is 14.18. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to YMM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to YMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check YMM's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while DOCU trades at $45.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 31.08. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check DOCU's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while PCOR trades at $56.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is -84.46. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check PCOR's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, FIG has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while FIG trades at $17.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas FIG's P/E ratio is -4.77. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to FIG's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to FIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check FIG's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, OCFT has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while OCFT trades at $7.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas OCFT's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to OCFT's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, OS and OCFT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OCFT's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while MANH trades at $137.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 38.65. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check MANH's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while NATI trades at $59.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check NATI's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while SMAR trades at $56.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check SMAR's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while IDCC trades at $296.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 25.09. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check IDCC's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while CWAN trades at $24.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is -172.71. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CWAN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check CWAN's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while PAYC trades at $126.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 15.70. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check PAYC's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while DSGX trades at $72.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 38.58. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check DSGX's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while NICE trades at $102.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 10.55. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check NICE's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while PEGA trades at $36.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 19.76. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check PEGA's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while COUP trades at $80.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check COUP's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while APPF trades at $167.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 39.79. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check APPF's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while PCTY trades at $105.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 24.82. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check PCTY's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while OTEX trades at $22.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 13.25. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check OTEX's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while TTAN trades at $59.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is -34.40. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check TTAN's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while FROG trades at $46.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is -74.82. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check FROG's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while LYFT trades at $14.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 2.08. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check LYFT's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, YOU has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while YOU trades at $53.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas YOU's P/E ratio is 47.66. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to YOU's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to YOU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check YOU's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while DUOL trades at $110.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 12.85. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check DUOL's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while ESTC trades at $46.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is -58.77. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ESTC's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check ESTC's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while ZETA trades at $18.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is -131.64. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check ZETA's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, KC has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while KC trades at $15.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas KC's P/E ratio is -29.55. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to KC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to KC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check KC's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, GRND-WT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while GRND-WT trades at $6.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas GRND-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GRND-WT's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to GRND-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check GRND-WT's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while CVLT trades at $98.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 62.58. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check CVLT's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while COMP trades at $7.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is -75.70. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to COMP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check COMP's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while CVT trades at $8.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OS and CVT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CVT's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, NAVN has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while NAVN trades at $17.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas NAVN's P/E ratio is -4.30. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NAVN's ROE of -2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to NAVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check NAVN's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while PYCR trades at $22.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OS and PYCR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PYCR's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, FSLY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while FSLY trades at $25.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas FSLY's P/E ratio is -30.43. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to FSLY's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to FSLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check FSLY's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while SRAD trades at $13.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 50.19. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check SRAD's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while PWSC trades at $22.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check PWSC's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while GTLB trades at $22.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is -65.07. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GTLB's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check GTLB's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while BILL trades at $38.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is -165.28. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BILL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check BILL's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while BULL trades at $6.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is -5.55. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BULL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check BULL's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while DAVE trades at $271.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 20.10. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check DAVE's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, RNG has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while RNG trades at $40.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas RNG's P/E ratio is 83.79. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to RNG's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to RNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check RNG's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while AYX trades at $48.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check AYX's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, ADEA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while ADEA trades at $31.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas ADEA's P/E ratio is 32.17. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ADEA's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to ADEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check ADEA's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while ENV trades at $63.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, OS and ENV have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ENV's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while LIF trades at $43.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 24.34. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to LIF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check LIF's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while INST trades at $23.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OS and INST have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check INST's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while ZI trades at $9.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 77.92. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check ZI's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while MNDY trades at $65.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 29.41. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check MNDY's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SOUN has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while SOUN trades at $7.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas SOUN's P/E ratio is -28.43. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SOUN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to SOUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check SOUN's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, NATL has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while NATL trades at $44.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas NATL's P/E ratio is 20.74. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NATL's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to NATL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check NATL's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while RUM trades at $7.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -24.29. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to RUM's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to RUM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check RUM's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CLSK has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while CLSK trades at $12.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas CLSK's P/E ratio is -11.82. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CLSK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to CLSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check CLSK's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while QTWO trades at $50.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is 63.49. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to QTWO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check QTWO's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while GBTG trades at $5.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is 26.61. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GBTG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check GBTG's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while WK trades at $53.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas WK's P/E ratio is -113.73. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to WK's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to WK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check WK's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CALX has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while CALX trades at $43.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas CALX's P/E ratio is 88.83. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CALX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to CALX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check CALX's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, DBD has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while DBD trades at $76.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas DBD's P/E ratio is 30.25. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DBD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to DBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check DBD's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, DCT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while DCT trades at $18.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas DCT's P/E ratio is -172.64. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DCT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to DCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check DCT's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, BRZE has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while BRZE trades at $22.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas BRZE's P/E ratio is -18.06. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BRZE's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to BRZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check BRZE's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, GRND has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while GRND trades at $13.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas GRND's P/E ratio is 31.09. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GRND's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to GRND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check GRND's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SPNS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while SPNS trades at $43.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas SPNS's P/E ratio is 37.78. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SPNS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OS and SPNS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SPNS's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, STUB has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while STUB trades at $7.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas STUB's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to STUB's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to STUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check STUB's competition here

OS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, OS stands at 2.4B. In comparison, FRSH has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OS is priced at $24.00, while FRSH trades at $8.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

OS currently has a P/E ratio of -85.71, whereas FRSH's P/E ratio is 12.98. In terms of profitability, OS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to FRSH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, OS is less volatile compared to FRSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OS.Check FRSH's competition here