Varonis Systems, Inc.

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, MSFT has a market cap of 2.9T. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while MSFT trades at $395.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas MSFT's P/E ratio is 24.74. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to MSFT's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is more volatile compared to MSFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check MSFT's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ORCL has a market cap of 445.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while ORCL trades at $155.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas ORCL's P/E ratio is 29.15. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to ORCL's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is less volatile compared to ORCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check ORCL's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, PLTR has a market cap of 345.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while PLTR trades at $150.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas PLTR's P/E ratio is 235.86. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to PLTR's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is less volatile compared to PLTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check PLTR's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, PANW has a market cap of 113.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while PANW trades at $167.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas PANW's P/E ratio is 92.78. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to PANW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is more volatile compared to PANW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check PANW's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CRWD has a market cap of 111.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while CRWD trades at $441.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas CRWD's P/E ratio is -669.36. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to CRWD's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is more volatile compared to CRWD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check CRWD's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 102.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while ADBE trades at $249.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 14.93. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is less volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check ADBE's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SNPS has a market cap of 79B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while SNPS trades at $412.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas SNPS's P/E ratio is 63.58. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SNPS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is more volatile compared to SNPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check SNPS's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NET has a market cap of 74.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while NET trades at $212.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas NET's P/E ratio is -707.67. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to NET's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is less volatile compared to NET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check NET's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, FTNT has a market cap of 62.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while FTNT trades at $83.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas FTNT's P/E ratio is 34.48. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to FTNT's ROE of +1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is more volatile compared to FTNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check FTNT's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, VMW has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while VMW trades at $142.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas VMW's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to VMW's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is more volatile compared to VMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check VMW's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SQ has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while SQ trades at $83.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas SQ's P/E ratio is 49.98. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SQ's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is more volatile compared to SQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check SQ's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CRWV has a market cap of 42.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while CRWV trades at $81.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas CRWV's P/E ratio is -28.86. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to CRWV's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is less volatile compared to CRWV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check CRWV's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, XYZ has a market cap of 36.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while XYZ trades at $59.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas XYZ's P/E ratio is 28.48. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to XYZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is more volatile compared to XYZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check XYZ's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NETE has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while NETE trades at $13.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas NETE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to NETE's ROE of +3.34%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is less volatile compared to NETE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check NETE's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SPLK has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while SPLK trades at $156.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas SPLK's P/E ratio is 103.22. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SPLK's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is more volatile compared to SPLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check SPLK's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ZS has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while ZS trades at $153.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas ZS's P/E ratio is -366.10. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to ZS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is more volatile compared to ZS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check ZS's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CPAY has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while CPAY trades at $317.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas CPAY's P/E ratio is 21.12. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to CPAY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is more volatile compared to CPAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check CPAY's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, VRSN has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while VRSN trades at $238.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas VRSN's P/E ratio is 27.05. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to VRSN's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is more volatile compared to VRSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check VRSN's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, FLT has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while FLT trades at $303.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas FLT's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to FLT's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is more volatile compared to FLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check FLT's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, MDB has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while MDB trades at $260.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas MDB's P/E ratio is -292.70. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to MDB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is less volatile compared to MDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check MDB's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CYBR has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while CYBR trades at $408.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas CYBR's P/E ratio is -139.06. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to CYBR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is more volatile compared to CYBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check CYBR's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, IOT has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while IOT trades at $31.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas IOT's P/E ratio is -1586.50. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to IOT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is more volatile compared to IOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check IOT's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CHKP has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while CHKP trades at $153.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas CHKP's P/E ratio is 16.33. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to CHKP's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is more volatile compared to CHKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check CHKP's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, FFIV has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while FFIV trades at $289.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas FFIV's P/E ratio is 23.97. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to FFIV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is more volatile compared to FFIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check FFIV's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, TOST has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while TOST trades at $27.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas TOST's P/E ratio is 49.29. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to TOST's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is more volatile compared to TOST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check TOST's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AFRM has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while AFRM trades at $46.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas AFRM's P/E ratio is 57.88. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to AFRM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is less volatile compared to AFRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check AFRM's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AKAM has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while AKAM trades at $107.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas AKAM's P/E ratio is 35.07. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to AKAM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is less volatile compared to AKAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check AKAM's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NLOK has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while NLOK trades at $21.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas NLOK's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to NLOK's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is less volatile compared to NLOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check NLOK's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, OKTA has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while OKTA trades at $79.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas OKTA's P/E ratio is 60.43. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to OKTA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is more volatile compared to OKTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check OKTA's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, KSPI has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while KSPI trades at $68.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas KSPI's P/E ratio is 6.16. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to KSPI's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is less volatile compared to KSPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check KSPI's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, GEN has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while GEN trades at $20.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas GEN's P/E ratio is 21.32. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to GEN's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is more volatile compared to GEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check GEN's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, GDDY has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while GDDY trades at $81.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas GDDY's P/E ratio is 13.05. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to GDDY's ROE of +3.84%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is more volatile compared to GDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check GDDY's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CFLT has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while CFLT trades at $30.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas CFLT's P/E ratio is -35.66. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to CFLT's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is more volatile compared to CFLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check CFLT's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, RBRK has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while RBRK trades at $53.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas RBRK's P/E ratio is -34.48. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to RBRK's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is less volatile compared to RBRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check RBRK's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NTNX has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while NTNX trades at $39.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas NTNX's P/E ratio is 42.71. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to NTNX's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is more volatile compared to NTNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check NTNX's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ALTR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while ALTR trades at $111.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas ALTR's P/E ratio is 699.06. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to ALTR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is more volatile compared to ALTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check ALTR's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, PLAN has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while PLAN trades at $63.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas PLAN's P/E ratio is -44.82. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to PLAN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is more volatile compared to PLAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check PLAN's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SAIL has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while SAIL trades at $15.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas SAIL's P/E ratio is -12.87. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SAIL's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is more volatile compared to SAIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check SAIL's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, INFA has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while INFA trades at $24.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas INFA's P/E ratio is 826.33. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to INFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is more volatile compared to INFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check INFA's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, DOX has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while DOX trades at $66.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas DOX's P/E ratio is 12.83. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to DOX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is more volatile compared to DOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check DOX's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, HCP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while HCP trades at $34.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas HCP's P/E ratio is -57.97. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to HCP's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is more volatile compared to HCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check HCP's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, DBX has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while DBX trades at $25.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas DBX's P/E ratio is 13.84. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to DBX's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is more volatile compared to DBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check DBX's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, JCOM has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while JCOM trades at $142.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas JCOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to JCOM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is more volatile compared to JCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check JCOM's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SQSP has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while SQSP trades at $46.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas SQSP's P/E ratio is -1164.25. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SQSP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is more volatile compared to SQSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check SQSP's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, DOCN has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while DOCN trades at $68.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas DOCN's P/E ratio is 27.24. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to DOCN's ROE of -2.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is less volatile compared to DOCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check DOCN's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, PATH has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while PATH trades at $11.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas PATH's P/E ratio is 27.54. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to PATH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is less volatile compared to PATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check PATH's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NEWR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while NEWR trades at $86.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas NEWR's P/E ratio is -41.62. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to NEWR's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is more volatile compared to NEWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check NEWR's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, KLAR has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while KLAR trades at $15.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas KLAR's P/E ratio is -53.00. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to KLAR's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is less volatile compared to KLAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check KLAR's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, KVYO has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while KVYO trades at $19.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas KVYO's P/E ratio is -173.82. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to KVYO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is less volatile compared to KVYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check KVYO's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CCCS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while CCCS trades at $8.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas CCCS's P/E ratio is -875.00. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to CCCS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is less volatile compared to CCCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check CCCS's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, BLSH has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while BLSH trades at $36.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas BLSH's P/E ratio is -5.96. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to BLSH's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is less volatile compared to BLSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check BLSH's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, WEX has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while WEX trades at $159.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas WEX's P/E ratio is 18.88. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to WEX's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is more volatile compared to WEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check WEX's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CORZZ has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while CORZZ trades at $16.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas CORZZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to CORZZ's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is more volatile compared to CORZZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check CORZZ's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CORZ has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while CORZ trades at $16.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas CORZ's P/E ratio is -18.74. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to CORZ's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is less volatile compared to CORZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check CORZ's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, S has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while S trades at $14.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas S's P/E ratio is -11.55. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to S's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is less volatile compared to S. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check S's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, WIX has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while WIX trades at $88.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas WIX's P/E ratio is 100.10. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to WIX's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is more volatile compared to WIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check WIX's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NVEI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while NVEI trades at $33.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas NVEI's P/E ratio is 212.44. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to NVEI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is more volatile compared to NVEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check NVEI's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ACIW has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while ACIW trades at $39.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas ACIW's P/E ratio is 18.41. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to ACIW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is less volatile compared to ACIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check ACIW's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ESMT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while ESMT trades at $23.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas ESMT's P/E ratio is 153.67. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to ESMT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is more volatile compared to ESMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check ESMT's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, FOUR has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while FOUR trades at $43.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas FOUR's P/E ratio is 40.10. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to FOUR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is less volatile compared to FOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check FOUR's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CCC has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while CCC trades at $6.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas CCC's P/E ratio is -602.00. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to CCC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is less volatile compared to CCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check CCC's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, STNE has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while STNE trades at $13.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas STNE's P/E ratio is 8.32. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to STNE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is less volatile compared to STNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check STNE's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CLBT has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while CLBT trades at $14.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas CLBT's P/E ratio is 46.58. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to CLBT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS and CLBT have similar daily volatility (3.70).Check CLBT's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, QLYS has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while QLYS trades at $99.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas QLYS's P/E ratio is 18.33. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to QLYS's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is less volatile compared to QLYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check QLYS's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while BOX trades at $24.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 42.90. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to BOX's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is more volatile compared to BOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check BOX's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, DLO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while DLO trades at $11.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas DLO's P/E ratio is 20.25. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to DLO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is less volatile compared to DLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check DLO's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, RELY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while RELY trades at $15.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas RELY's P/E ratio is 49.19. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to RELY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is less volatile compared to RELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check RELY's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CORZW has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while CORZW trades at $10.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas CORZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to CORZW's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is less volatile compared to CORZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check CORZW's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SWI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while SWI trades at $18.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas SWI's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SWI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is more volatile compared to SWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check SWI's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, EVOP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while EVOP trades at $33.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas EVOP's P/E ratio is -309.00. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to EVOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is more volatile compared to EVOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check EVOP's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, EEFT has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while EEFT trades at $71.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas EEFT's P/E ratio is 10.10. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to EEFT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is more volatile compared to EEFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check EEFT's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, PAGS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while PAGS trades at $9.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas PAGS's P/E ratio is 6.70. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to PAGS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is less volatile compared to PAGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check PAGS's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, TDC has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while TDC trades at $26.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas TDC's P/E ratio is 19.70. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to TDC's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is less volatile compared to TDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check TDC's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, TENB has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while TENB trades at $20.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas TENB's P/E ratio is -67.63. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to TENB's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is less volatile compared to TENB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check TENB's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SPSC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while SPSC trades at $60.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas SPSC's P/E ratio is 23.93. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SPSC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is more volatile compared to SPSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check SPSC's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CSGS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while CSGS trades at $79.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas CSGS's P/E ratio is 40.36. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to CSGS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is more volatile compared to CSGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check CSGS's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AVPT has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while AVPT trades at $10.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas AVPT's P/E ratio is 69.53. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to AVPT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is more volatile compared to AVPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check AVPT's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NTCT has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while NTCT trades at $29.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas NTCT's P/E ratio is 22.54. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to NTCT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is more volatile compared to NTCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check NTCT's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AVDX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while AVDX trades at $10.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas AVDX's P/E ratio is -250.00. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to AVDX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is more volatile compared to AVDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check AVDX's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, GETVV has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while GETVV trades at $2.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas GETVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to GETVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is less volatile compared to GETVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check GETVV's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, BB has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while BB trades at $3.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas BB's P/E ratio is 83.38. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to BB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is less volatile compared to BB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check BB's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, FORG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while FORG trades at $23.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas FORG's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to FORG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is less volatile compared to FORG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check FORG's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, WRD has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while WRD trades at $6.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas WRD's P/E ratio is -8.42. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to WRD's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is less volatile compared to WRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check WRD's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, APPN has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while APPN trades at $25.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas APPN's P/E ratio is 1279.50. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to APPN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is more volatile compared to APPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check APPN's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, PICS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while PICS trades at $14.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas PICS's P/E ratio is 29.22. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to PICS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is less volatile compared to PICS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check PICS's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, GSKY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while GSKY trades at $10.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas GSKY's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to GSKY's ROE of +5.47%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is more volatile compared to GSKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check GSKY's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, EVTC has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while EVTC trades at $29.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas EVTC's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to EVTC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is more volatile compared to EVTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check EVTC's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, EVCM has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while EVCM trades at $10.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas EVCM's P/E ratio is -125.62. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to EVCM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is less volatile compared to EVCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check EVCM's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, RAMP has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while RAMP trades at $27.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas RAMP's P/E ratio is 26.87. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to RAMP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is less volatile compared to RAMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check RAMP's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, GET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while GET trades at $1.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas GET's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to GET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is more volatile compared to GET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check GET's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, MQ has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while MQ trades at $3.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas MQ's P/E ratio is -132.33. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to MQ's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is more volatile compared to MQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check MQ's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, STER has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while STER trades at $16.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas STER's P/E ratio is -98.47. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to STER's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is more volatile compared to STER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check STER's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, PAYO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while PAYO trades at $4.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas PAYO's P/E ratio is 23.89. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to PAYO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is more volatile compared to PAYO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check PAYO's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, GCT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while GCT trades at $40.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas GCT's P/E ratio is 11.41. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to GCT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is less volatile compared to GCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check GCT's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ZUO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while ZUO trades at $10.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas ZUO's P/E ratio is -19.65. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to ZUO's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is more volatile compared to ZUO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check ZUO's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ATEN has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while ATEN trades at $20.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas ATEN's P/E ratio is 36.75. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to ATEN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is more volatile compared to ATEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check ATEN's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SUMO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while SUMO trades at $12.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas SUMO's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SUMO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is more volatile compared to SUMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check SUMO's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, GB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while GB trades at $7.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas GB's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to GB's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is more volatile compared to GB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check GB's competition here

VRNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VRNS stands at 2.9B. In comparison, TUYA has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VRNS is priced at $24.69, while TUYA trades at $2.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VRNS currently has a P/E ratio of -21.85, whereas TUYA's P/E ratio is 27.06. In terms of profitability, VRNS's ROE is -0.27%, compared to TUYA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VRNS is more volatile compared to TUYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VRNS.Check TUYA's competition here