Uber Technologies, Inc.

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 334B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while SAP trades at $286.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 44.47. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check SAP's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 247B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while CRM trades at $258.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 40.44. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check CRM's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 219B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while INTU trades at $785.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 63.99. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check INTU's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 196.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while NOW trades at $943.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 119.12. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check NOW's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 158.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while SHOP trades at $122.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 99.36. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check SHOP's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 132.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while APP trades at $390.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 70.65. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.25%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check APP's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 118.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while STRK trades at $111.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check STRK's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 113.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while MSTR trades at $401.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -18.07. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check MSTR's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 99.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while CDNS trades at $364.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 98.52. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check CDNS's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 74.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while SNOW trades at $223.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is -53.23. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check SNOW's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 64.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while ADSK trades at $303.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 65.05. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is more volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check ADSK's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 61.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while WDAY trades at $229.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 126.73. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check WDAY's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 50.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while TEAM trades at $191.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is -116.94. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check TEAM's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 48.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while DDOG trades at $139.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 291.63. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check DDOG's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, TTD has a market cap of 42.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while TTD trades at $86.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas TTD's P/E ratio is 106.05. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to TTD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to TTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check TTD's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 35B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while FICO trades at $1,436.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 61.86. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check FICO's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while ANSS trades at $374.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 55.53. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check ANSS's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while STRF trades at $121.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is more volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check STRF's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while HUBS trades at $519.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is -1180.00. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to HUBS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check HUBS's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while PTC trades at $214.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 50.54. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check PTC's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while TYL trades at $584.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 83.60. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check TYL's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while ZM trades at $74.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 22.24. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is more volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check ZM's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while SSNC trades at $85.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 26.97. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check SSNC's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while GRAB trades at $4.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 489.00. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check GRAB's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while GWRE trades at $226.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 526.09. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is more volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check GWRE's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while BSY trades at $57.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 74.33. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is more volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check BSY's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while AZPN trades at $264.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to AZPN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check AZPN's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while DT trades at $52.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 33.09. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check DT's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while DUOL trades at $346.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 169.88. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check DUOL's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while DOCU trades at $75.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check DOCU's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, U has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while U trades at $33.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas U's P/E ratio is -29.79. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to U's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check U's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, QXO has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while QXO trades at $20.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas QXO's P/E ratio is -57.29. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to QXO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to QXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check QXO's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while PAYC trades at $231.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 32.94. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check PAYC's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while MNDY trades at $262.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 264.94. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check MNDY's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while MANH trades at $219.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 61.36. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check MANH's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while BKI trades at $75.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check BKI's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while XM trades at $18.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check XM's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while CDAY trades at $69.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to CDAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is more volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check CDAY's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while PCOR trades at $71.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is -82.94. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check PCOR's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while TTAN trades at $116.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is -31.37. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is more volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check TTAN's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while PCTY trades at $184.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 45.99. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check PCTY's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while PEGA trades at $58.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 48.52. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check PEGA's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while NICE trades at $156.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 21.76. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check NICE's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while APPF trades at $267.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 49.79. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check APPF's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while DAY trades at $57.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is 360.56. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to DAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check DAY's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while SRAD trades at $29.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 147.85. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is more volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check SRAD's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while DSGX trades at $105.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 64.10. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is more volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check DSGX's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while ESTC trades at $83.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is -80.46. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to ESTC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check ESTC's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while CVLT trades at $189.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 105.61. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check CVLT's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while NATI trades at $59.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check NATI's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while SMAR trades at $56.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check SMAR's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while OTEX trades at $29.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 12.06. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is more volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check OTEX's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while GTLB trades at $43.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is 486.78. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to GTLB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check GTLB's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while BULL trades at $14.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is 11.44. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to BULL's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check BULL's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while IDCC trades at $258.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 20.41. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check IDCC's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while COUP trades at $80.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check COUP's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while LIF trades at $76.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 589.15. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to LIF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is more volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check LIF's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while LYFT trades at $14.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 93.73. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is more volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check LYFT's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while CWAN trades at $20.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is 11.92. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to CWAN's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check CWAN's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, VERX has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while VERX trades at $33.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas VERX's P/E ratio is -114.38. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to VERX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to VERX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check VERX's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while QTWO trades at $81.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is -238.84. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to QTWO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check QTWO's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while FROG trades at $43.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is -61.14. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check FROG's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, RIOT has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while RIOT trades at $13.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas RIOT's P/E ratio is -9.79. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to RIOT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to RIOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check RIOT's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while BILL trades at $42.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is -2142.50. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check BILL's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while CVT trades at $8.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check CVT's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, SOUN has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while SOUN trades at $10.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas SOUN's P/E ratio is -16.93. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to SOUN's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to SOUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check SOUN's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while COMP trades at $7.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is -61.12. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to COMP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check COMP's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while PYCR trades at $22.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check PYCR's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, ETWO-WT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while ETWO-WT trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas ETWO-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to ETWO-WT's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is more volatile compared to ETWO-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check ETWO-WT's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while PWSC trades at $22.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check PWSC's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, FRSH has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while FRSH trades at $12.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas FRSH's P/E ratio is -72.17. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to FRSH's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to FRSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check FRSH's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, CALX has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while CALX trades at $56.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas CALX's P/E ratio is -138.27. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to CALX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is more volatile compared to CALX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check CALX's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while ZETA trades at $15.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is -62.64. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check ZETA's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while RUM trades at $8.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -5.78. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to RUM's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to RUM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check RUM's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, RUMBW has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while RUMBW trades at $2.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas RUMBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to RUMBW's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to RUMBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check RUMBW's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while WK trades at $63.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas WK's P/E ratio is -55.05. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to WK's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to WK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check WK's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while AYX trades at $48.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check AYX's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while ENV trades at $63.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check ENV's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while INST trades at $23.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check INST's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, ASAN has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while ASAN trades at $14.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas ASAN's P/E ratio is -14.68. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to ASAN's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to ASAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check ASAN's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, GRND has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while GRND trades at $17.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas GRND's P/E ratio is -29.12. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to GRND's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to GRND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check GRND's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while ZI trades at $9.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 116.88. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check ZI's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, BL has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while BL trades at $53.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas BL's P/E ratio is 38.97. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to BL's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to BL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check BL's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, BLKB has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while BLKB trades at $67.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas BLKB's P/E ratio is -12.04. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to BLKB's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to BLKB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check BLKB's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, INTA has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while INTA trades at $40.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas INTA's P/E ratio is -166.87. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to INTA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to INTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check INTA's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, NCNO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while NCNO trades at $27.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas NCNO's P/E ratio is -111.70. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to NCNO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to NCNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check NCNO's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, DAVEW has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while DAVEW trades at $1.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas DAVEW's P/E ratio is -8.57. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to DAVEW's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to DAVEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check DAVEW's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, AGYS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while AGYS trades at $114.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas AGYS's P/E ratio is 237.67. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to AGYS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to AGYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check AGYS's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, CLSK has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while CLSK trades at $11.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas CLSK's P/E ratio is -10.24. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to CLSK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to CLSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check CLSK's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while DAVE trades at $235.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 66.42. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check DAVE's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, BRZE has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while BRZE trades at $27.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas BRZE's P/E ratio is -27.60. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to BRZE's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to BRZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check BRZE's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while GBTG trades at $6.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is -64.45. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to GBTG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check GBTG's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, ALIT has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while ALIT trades at $5.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas ALIT's P/E ratio is -89.17. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to ALIT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is more volatile compared to ALIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check ALIT's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, ALRM has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while ALRM trades at $54.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas ALRM's P/E ratio is 23.05. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to ALRM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is more volatile compared to ALRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check ALRM's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, YOU has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while YOU trades at $29.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas YOU's P/E ratio is 18.17. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to YOU's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is more volatile compared to YOU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check YOU's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, BTDR has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while BTDR trades at $12.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas BTDR's P/E ratio is -2.72. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to BTDR's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to BTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check BTDR's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, DCT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while DCT trades at $18.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas DCT's P/E ratio is -172.64. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to DCT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is more volatile compared to DCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check DCT's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, DV has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while DV trades at $15.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas DV's P/E ratio is 52.84. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to DV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is more volatile compared to DV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check DV's competition here

UBER plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UBER stands at 183.6B. In comparison, PAR has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UBER is priced at $87.75, while PAR trades at $60.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UBER currently has a P/E ratio of 15.37, whereas PAR's P/E ratio is -23.83. In terms of profitability, UBER's ROE is +0.70%, compared to PAR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UBER is less volatile compared to PAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBER.Check PAR's competition here