Toast, Inc.
Toast, Inc. TOST Peers
See (TOST) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOST | $43.58 | +2.44% | 25.2B | 161.41 | $0.27 | N/A |
| MSFT | $498.84 | +1.58% | 3.7T | 38.55 | $12.94 | +0.65% |
| ORCL | $237.32 | +3.19% | 666.6B | 54.56 | $4.35 | +0.72% |
| PLTR | $134.36 | +1.70% | 304B | 584.17 | $0.23 | N/A |
| ADBE | $379.31 | +0.22% | 161.7B | 24.31 | $15.60 | N/A |
| PANW | $201.82 | +2.46% | 134.6B | 115.99 | $1.74 | N/A |
| CRWD | $514.10 | +3.63% | 128.1B | -756.03 | -$0.68 | N/A |
| SNPS | $548.74 | +4.90% | 85.1B | 63.44 | $8.65 | N/A |
| HOOD | $94.40 | -3.65% | 83.3B | 53.94 | $1.75 | N/A |
| FTNT | $105.66 | +3.38% | 80.9B | 43.48 | $2.43 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TOST vs MSFT Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, MSFT has a market cap of 3.7T. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while MSFT trades at $498.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas MSFT's P/E ratio is 38.55. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MSFT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to MSFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs ORCL Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, ORCL has a market cap of 666.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while ORCL trades at $237.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas ORCL's P/E ratio is 54.56. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ORCL's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to ORCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs PLTR Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, PLTR has a market cap of 304B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while PLTR trades at $134.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas PLTR's P/E ratio is 584.17. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PLTR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to PLTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs ADBE Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 161.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while ADBE trades at $379.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 24.31. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs PANW Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, PANW has a market cap of 134.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while PANW trades at $201.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas PANW's P/E ratio is 115.99. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PANW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to PANW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs CRWD Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, CRWD has a market cap of 128.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while CRWD trades at $514.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas CRWD's P/E ratio is -756.03. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CRWD's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to CRWD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs SNPS Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, SNPS has a market cap of 85.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while SNPS trades at $548.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas SNPS's P/E ratio is 63.44. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SNPS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to SNPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs HOOD Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, HOOD has a market cap of 83.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while HOOD trades at $94.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas HOOD's P/E ratio is 53.94. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HOOD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is less volatile compared to HOOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs FTNT Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, FTNT has a market cap of 80.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while FTNT trades at $105.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas FTNT's P/E ratio is 43.48. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FTNT's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to FTNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs CRWV Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, CRWV has a market cap of 78.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while CRWV trades at $164.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas CRWV's P/E ratio is -64.97. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CRWV's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is less volatile compared to CRWV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs NET Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, NET has a market cap of 66.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while NET trades at $191.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas NET's P/E ratio is -831.61. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NET's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to NET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs VMW Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, VMW has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while VMW trades at $142.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas VMW's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VMW's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to VMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs SQ Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, SQ has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while SQ trades at $83.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas SQ's P/E ratio is 49.98. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SQ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to SQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs ZS Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, ZS has a market cap of 49B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while ZS trades at $314.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas ZS's P/E ratio is -1165.81. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ZS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to ZS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs XYZ Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, XYZ has a market cap of 42.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while XYZ trades at $69.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas XYZ's P/E ratio is 16.80. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to XYZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to XYZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs NETE Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, NETE has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while NETE trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas NETE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NETE's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is less volatile compared to NETE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs VRSN Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, VRSN has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while VRSN trades at $286.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas VRSN's P/E ratio is 35.00. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VRSN's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to VRSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs SPLK Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, SPLK has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while SPLK trades at $156.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas SPLK's P/E ratio is 103.22. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SPLK's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to SPLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs GDDY Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, GDDY has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while GDDY trades at $177.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas GDDY's P/E ratio is 34.17. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GDDY's ROE of +2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to GDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs CHKP Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, CHKP has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while CHKP trades at $223.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas CHKP's P/E ratio is 29.54. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CHKP's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to CHKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs CPAY Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, CPAY has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while CPAY trades at $339.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas CPAY's P/E ratio is 23.78. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CPAY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to CPAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs AFRM Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, AFRM has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while AFRM trades at $69.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas AFRM's P/E ratio is -364.16. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AFRM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to AFRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs IOT Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, IOT has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while IOT trades at $39.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas IOT's P/E ratio is -177.77. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IOT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to IOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs FLT Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, FLT has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while FLT trades at $303.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas FLT's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FLT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to FLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs NTNX Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, NTNX has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while NTNX trades at $76.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas NTNX's P/E ratio is -295.38. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NTNX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to NTNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs CYBR Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, CYBR has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while CYBR trades at $398.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas CYBR's P/E ratio is -196.43. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CYBR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to CYBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs GEN Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, GEN has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while GEN trades at $30.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas GEN's P/E ratio is 29.60. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GEN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to GEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs MDB Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, MDB has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while MDB trades at $211.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas MDB's P/E ratio is -192.13. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MDB's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is less volatile compared to MDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs RBRK Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, RBRK has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while RBRK trades at $89.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas RBRK's P/E ratio is 25.67. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RBRK's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is less volatile compared to RBRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs FFIV Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, FFIV has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while FFIV trades at $300.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas FFIV's P/E ratio is 28.53. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FFIV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to FFIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs OKTA Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, OKTA has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while OKTA trades at $99.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas OKTA's P/E ratio is 152.48. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OKTA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to OKTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs KSPI Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, KSPI has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while KSPI trades at $84.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas KSPI's P/E ratio is 7.89. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KSPI's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to KSPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs NLOK Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, NLOK has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while NLOK trades at $21.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas NLOK's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NLOK's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is less volatile compared to NLOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs SAIL Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, SAIL has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while SAIL trades at $22.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas SAIL's P/E ratio is -13.60. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SAIL's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to SAIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs AKAM Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, AKAM has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while AKAM trades at $79.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas AKAM's P/E ratio is 26.67. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AKAM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to AKAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs DOX Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, DOX has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while DOX trades at $92.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas DOX's P/E ratio is 19.45. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DOX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to DOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs ALTR Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, ALTR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while ALTR trades at $111.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas ALTR's P/E ratio is 699.06. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ALTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to ALTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs PLAN Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, PLAN has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while PLAN trades at $63.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas PLAN's P/E ratio is -44.82. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PLAN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to PLAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs KVYO Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, KVYO has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while KVYO trades at $33.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas KVYO's P/E ratio is -199.47. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KVYO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is less volatile compared to KVYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs WIX Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, WIX has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while WIX trades at $164.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas WIX's P/E ratio is 65.19. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WIX's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to WIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs FOUR Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, FOUR has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while FOUR trades at $101.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas FOUR's P/E ratio is 34.86. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FOUR's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is less volatile compared to FOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs CFLT Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, CFLT has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while CFLT trades at $26.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas CFLT's P/E ratio is -27.11. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CFLT's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is less volatile compared to CFLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs INFA Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, INFA has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while INFA trades at $24.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas INFA's P/E ratio is 813.67. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to INFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to INFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs DBX Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, DBX has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while DBX trades at $28.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas DBX's P/E ratio is 18.42. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DBX's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to DBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs HCP Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, HCP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while HCP trades at $34.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas HCP's P/E ratio is -57.97. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HCP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to HCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs PATH Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, PATH has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while PATH trades at $13.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas PATH's P/E ratio is -110.75. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PATH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is less volatile compared to PATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs JCOM Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, JCOM has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while JCOM trades at $142.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas JCOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JCOM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to JCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs SQSP Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, SQSP has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while SQSP trades at $46.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas SQSP's P/E ratio is -1164.25. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SQSP's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to SQSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs CCCS Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, CCCS has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while CCCS trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas CCCS's P/E ratio is 975.00. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CCCS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to CCCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs NEWR Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, NEWR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while NEWR trades at $86.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas NEWR's P/E ratio is -41.62. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NEWR's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to NEWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs S Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, S has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while S trades at $18.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas S's P/E ratio is -13.98. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to S's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to S. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs VRNS Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, VRNS has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while VRNS trades at $51.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas VRNS's P/E ratio is -63.15. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VRNS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to VRNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs QLYS Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, QLYS has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while QLYS trades at $150.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas QLYS's P/E ratio is 30.69. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to QLYS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to QLYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs SPSC Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, SPSC has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while SPSC trades at $141.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas SPSC's P/E ratio is 65.75. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SPSC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to SPSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs CORZ Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, CORZ has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while CORZ trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas CORZ's P/E ratio is -4.59. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CORZ's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is less volatile compared to CORZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs CORZZ Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, CORZZ has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while CORZZ trades at $17.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas CORZZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CORZZ's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is less volatile compared to CORZZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs WEX Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, WEX has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while WEX trades at $151.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas WEX's P/E ratio is 19.49. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WEX's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to WEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs ACIW Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, ACIW has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while ACIW trades at $46.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas ACIW's P/E ratio is 18.26. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ACIW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to ACIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs NVEI Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, NVEI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while NVEI trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas NVEI's P/E ratio is 212.44. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NVEI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to NVEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs BOX Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while BOX trades at $33.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 25.58. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BOX's ROE of +1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to BOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs EEFT Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, EEFT has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while EEFT trades at $106.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas EEFT's P/E ratio is 15.79. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EEFT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to EEFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs STNE Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, STNE has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while STNE trades at $16.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas STNE's P/E ratio is -20.22. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STNE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to STNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs ODD Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, ODD has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while ODD trades at $75.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas ODD's P/E ratio is 43.66. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ODD's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is less volatile compared to ODD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs TENB Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, TENB has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while TENB trades at $34.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas TENB's P/E ratio is -89.66. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TENB's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to TENB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs ESMT Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, ESMT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while ESMT trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas ESMT's P/E ratio is 153.67. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ESMT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to ESMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs AVPT Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, AVPT has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while AVPT trades at $18.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas AVPT's P/E ratio is -145.08. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AVPT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is less volatile compared to AVPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs RELY Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, RELY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while RELY trades at $18.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas RELY's P/E ratio is -616.67. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RELY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to RELY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs CLBT Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, CLBT has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while CLBT trades at $15.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas CLBT's P/E ratio is -16.79. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CLBT's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to CLBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs CORZW Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, CORZW has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while CORZW trades at $11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas CORZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CORZW's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is less volatile compared to CORZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs DLO Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, DLO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while DLO trades at $11.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas DLO's P/E ratio is 23.85. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DLO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is less volatile compared to DLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs SWI Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, SWI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while SWI trades at $18.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas SWI's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SWI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to SWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs PAGS Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, PAGS has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while PAGS trades at $9.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas PAGS's P/E ratio is 7.65. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PAGS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to PAGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs EVOP Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, EVOP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while EVOP trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas EVOP's P/E ratio is -309.00. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EVOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to EVOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs MQ Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, MQ has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while MQ trades at $5.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas MQ's P/E ratio is 59.50. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MQ's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to MQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs DOCN Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, DOCN has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while DOCN trades at $29.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas DOCN's P/E ratio is 25.84. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DOCN's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to DOCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs BB Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, BB has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while BB trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas BB's P/E ratio is 217.50. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BB's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is less volatile compared to BB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs PAYO Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, PAYO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while PAYO trades at $6.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas PAYO's P/E ratio is 24.93. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PAYO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to PAYO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs EVTC Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, EVTC has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while EVTC trades at $37.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas EVTC's P/E ratio is 18.85. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EVTC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to EVTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs WRD Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, WRD has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while WRD trades at $8.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas WRD's P/E ratio is -6.84. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WRD's ROE of +4.97%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is less volatile compared to WRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs APPN Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, APPN has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while APPN trades at $30.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas APPN's P/E ratio is -36.72. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to APPN's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to APPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs TDC Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, TDC has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while TDC trades at $23.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas TDC's P/E ratio is 16.46. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TDC's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to TDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs RAMP Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, RAMP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while RAMP trades at $33.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas RAMP's P/E ratio is -838.75. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RAMP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to RAMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs FIVN Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, FIVN has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while FIVN trades at $27.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas FIVN's P/E ratio is -461.83. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FIVN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to FIVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs GETVV Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, GETVV has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while GETVV trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas GETVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GETVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is less volatile compared to GETVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs AVDX Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, AVDX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while AVDX trades at $9.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas AVDX's P/E ratio is 246.25. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AVDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to AVDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs EVCM Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, EVCM has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while EVCM trades at $10.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas EVCM's P/E ratio is -90.58. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EVCM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to EVCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs FORG Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, FORG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while FORG trades at $23.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas FORG's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FORG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is less volatile compared to FORG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs CSGS Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, CSGS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while CSGS trades at $66.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas CSGS's P/E ratio is 22.62. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CSGS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to CSGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs GSKY Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, GSKY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while GSKY trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas GSKY's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GSKY's ROE of +5.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to GSKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs NTCT Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, NTCT has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while NTCT trades at $24.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas NTCT's P/E ratio is -4.85. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NTCT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to NTCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs GET Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, GET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while GET trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas GET's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to GET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs PGY Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, PGY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while PGY trades at $22.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas PGY's P/E ratio is -4.24. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PGY's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is less volatile compared to PGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs STER Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, STER has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while STER trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas STER's P/E ratio is -98.47. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STER's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to STER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs RPD Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, RPD has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while RPD trades at $24.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas RPD's P/E ratio is 59.44. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RPD's ROE of +9.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to RPD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs ZUO Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, ZUO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while ZUO trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas ZUO's P/E ratio is -19.65. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ZUO's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to ZUO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs TUYA Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, TUYA has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while TUYA trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas TUYA's P/E ratio is 61.25. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TUYA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to TUYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs AVPTW Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, AVPTW has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while AVPTW trades at $7.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas AVPTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AVPTW's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is less volatile compared to AVPTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs SUMO Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, SUMO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while SUMO trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas SUMO's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SUMO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to SUMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.
TOST vs GB Comparison
TOST plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TOST stands at 25.2B. In comparison, GB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TOST is priced at $43.58, while GB trades at $7.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TOST currently has a P/E ratio of 161.41, whereas GB's P/E ratio is 18.67. In terms of profitability, TOST's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GB's ROE of +0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, TOST is more volatile compared to GB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TOST.