Travel + Leisure Co.
Travel + Leisure Co. (TNL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TNL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TNL | $67.69 | -4.24% | 4.2B | 19.66 | $3.44 | +3.36% |
| BKNG | $4,062.14 | -3.60% | 130.9B | 24.53 | $165.60 | +0.97% |
| ABNB | $122.87 | -6.25% | 73.6B | 30.03 | $4.09 | N/A |
| RCL | $261.80 | -4.45% | 71.4B | 16.78 | $15.60 | +1.62% |
| TCOM | $48.49 | -3.44% | 31.7B | 7.01 | $6.92 | N/A |
| VIK | $68.58 | -4.20% | 30.4B | 26.69 | $2.57 | N/A |
| EXPE | $225.81 | -3.02% | 26.4B | 23.02 | $9.81 | +0.74% |
| SABRP | $71.42 | -0.78% | 23.6B | -35.87 | -$1.99 | N/A |
| NCLH | $18.49 | -6.85% | 8.4B | 20.11 | $0.92 | N/A |
| MMYT | $36.30 | -9.25% | 3.5B | 69.81 | $0.52 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TNL vs BKNG Comparison March 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.2B. In comparison, BKNG has a market cap of 130.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $67.69, while BKNG trades at $4,062.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.66, whereas BKNG's P/E ratio is 24.53. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to BKNG's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to BKNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check BKNG's competition here
TNL vs ABNB Comparison March 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.2B. In comparison, ABNB has a market cap of 73.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $67.69, while ABNB trades at $122.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.66, whereas ABNB's P/E ratio is 30.03. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to ABNB's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to ABNB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check ABNB's competition here
TNL vs RCL Comparison March 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.2B. In comparison, RCL has a market cap of 71.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $67.69, while RCL trades at $261.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.66, whereas RCL's P/E ratio is 16.78. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to RCL's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to RCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check RCL's competition here
TNL vs TCOM Comparison March 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.2B. In comparison, TCOM has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $67.69, while TCOM trades at $48.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.66, whereas TCOM's P/E ratio is 7.01. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to TCOM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is more volatile compared to TCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check TCOM's competition here
TNL vs VIK Comparison March 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.2B. In comparison, VIK has a market cap of 30.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $67.69, while VIK trades at $68.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.66, whereas VIK's P/E ratio is 26.69. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to VIK's ROE of +2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to VIK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check VIK's competition here
TNL vs EXPE Comparison March 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.2B. In comparison, EXPE has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $67.69, while EXPE trades at $225.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.66, whereas EXPE's P/E ratio is 23.02. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to EXPE's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to EXPE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check EXPE's competition here
TNL vs SABRP Comparison March 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.2B. In comparison, SABRP has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $67.69, while SABRP trades at $71.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.66, whereas SABRP's P/E ratio is -35.87. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SABRP's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is more volatile compared to SABRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check SABRP's competition here
TNL vs NCLH Comparison March 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.2B. In comparison, NCLH has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $67.69, while NCLH trades at $18.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.66, whereas NCLH's P/E ratio is 20.11. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to NCLH's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to NCLH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check NCLH's competition here
TNL vs MMYT Comparison March 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.2B. In comparison, MMYT has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $67.69, while MMYT trades at $36.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.66, whereas MMYT's P/E ratio is 69.81. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to MMYT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to MMYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check MMYT's competition here
TNL vs DESP Comparison March 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.2B. In comparison, DESP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $67.69, while DESP trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.66, whereas DESP's P/E ratio is -650.00. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to DESP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is more volatile compared to DESP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check DESP's competition here
TNL vs TRIP Comparison March 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.2B. In comparison, TRIP has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $67.69, while TRIP trades at $10.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.66, whereas TRIP's P/E ratio is 33.70. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to TRIP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to TRIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check TRIP's competition here
TNL vs LIND Comparison March 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.2B. In comparison, LIND has a market cap of 927.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $67.69, while LIND trades at $16.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.66, whereas LIND's P/E ratio is -26.78. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to LIND's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to LIND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check LIND's competition here
TNL vs NUTR Comparison March 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.2B. In comparison, NUTR has a market cap of 628.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $67.69, while NUTR trades at $41.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.66, whereas NUTR's P/E ratio is -836.00. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to NUTR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is more volatile compared to NUTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check NUTR's competition here
TNL vs SABR Comparison March 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.2B. In comparison, SABR has a market cap of 600.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $67.69, while SABR trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.66, whereas SABR's P/E ratio is -2.34. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SABR's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to SABR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check SABR's competition here
TNL vs MRNOW Comparison March 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.2B. In comparison, MRNOW has a market cap of 101.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $67.69, while MRNOW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.66, whereas MRNOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to MRNOW's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to MRNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check MRNOW's competition here
TNL vs YTRA Comparison March 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.2B. In comparison, YTRA has a market cap of 60.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $67.69, while YTRA trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.66, whereas YTRA's P/E ratio is -50.50. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to YTRA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to YTRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check YTRA's competition here
TNL vs AHMA Comparison March 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.2B. In comparison, AHMA has a market cap of 33M. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $67.69, while AHMA trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.66, whereas AHMA's P/E ratio is 27.75. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to AHMA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to AHMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check AHMA's competition here
TNL vs TOUR Comparison March 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.2B. In comparison, TOUR has a market cap of 30.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $67.69, while TOUR trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.66, whereas TOUR's P/E ratio is 19.25. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to TOUR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to TOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check TOUR's competition here
TNL vs NTRP Comparison March 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.2B. In comparison, NTRP has a market cap of 19.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $67.69, while NTRP trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.66, whereas NTRP's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to NTRP's ROE of -2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to NTRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check NTRP's competition here
TNL vs MKGI Comparison March 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.2B. In comparison, MKGI has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $67.69, while MKGI trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.66, whereas MKGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to MKGI's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to MKGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check MKGI's competition here
TNL vs JXG Comparison March 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.2B. In comparison, JXG has a market cap of 933.2K. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $67.69, while JXG trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.66, whereas JXG's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to JXG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to JXG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check JXG's competition here
TNL vs MOND Comparison March 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.2B. In comparison, MOND has a market cap of 87.4K. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $67.69, while MOND trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.66, whereas MOND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to MOND's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is more volatile compared to MOND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check MOND's competition here
TNL vs MONDW Comparison March 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.2B. In comparison, MONDW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $67.69, while MONDW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.66, whereas MONDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to MONDW's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to MONDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check MONDW's competition here
TNL vs SGLBW Comparison March 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.2B. In comparison, SGLBW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $67.69, while SGLBW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 19.66, whereas SGLBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SGLBW's ROE of -2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to SGLBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check SGLBW's competition here