Travel + Leisure Co.
Travel + Leisure Co. (TNL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TNL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TNL | $75.42 | +0.00% | 4.9B | 12.61 | $6.04 | +2.96% |
| BKNG | $4,007.45 | +0.00% | 131.4B | 26.56 | $153.49 | +0.95% |
| RCL | $310.35 | +0.00% | 85.9B | 20.20 | $15.60 | +1.11% |
| ABNB | $125.81 | +0.00% | 76.7B | 31.73 | $4.03 | N/A |
| TCOM | $55.34 | +0.00% | 35.7B | 14.55 | $3.75 | +0.51% |
| VIK | $77.04 | +0.00% | 34.9B | 36.81 | $2.14 | N/A |
| EXPE | $199.76 | +0.00% | 23.8B | 20.76 | $9.80 | +0.79% |
| SABRP | $71.42 | -0.78% | 23.6B | -35.87 | -$1.99 | N/A |
| NCLH | $23.74 | +0.00% | 11.1B | 17.50 | $1.39 | N/A |
| MMYT | $55.84 | +0.00% | 5.3B | 107.69 | $0.52 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TNL vs BKNG Comparison February 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.9B. In comparison, BKNG has a market cap of 131.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $75.42, while BKNG trades at $4,007.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas BKNG's P/E ratio is 26.56. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to BKNG's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to BKNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check BKNG's competition here
TNL vs RCL Comparison February 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.9B. In comparison, RCL has a market cap of 85.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $75.42, while RCL trades at $310.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas RCL's P/E ratio is 20.20. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to RCL's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to RCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check RCL's competition here
TNL vs ABNB Comparison February 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.9B. In comparison, ABNB has a market cap of 76.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $75.42, while ABNB trades at $125.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas ABNB's P/E ratio is 31.73. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to ABNB's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is more volatile compared to ABNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check ABNB's competition here
TNL vs TCOM Comparison February 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.9B. In comparison, TCOM has a market cap of 35.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $75.42, while TCOM trades at $55.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas TCOM's P/E ratio is 14.55. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to TCOM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is more volatile compared to TCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check TCOM's competition here
TNL vs VIK Comparison February 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.9B. In comparison, VIK has a market cap of 34.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $75.42, while VIK trades at $77.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas VIK's P/E ratio is 36.81. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to VIK's ROE of +6.50%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is more volatile compared to VIK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check VIK's competition here
TNL vs EXPE Comparison February 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.9B. In comparison, EXPE has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $75.42, while EXPE trades at $199.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas EXPE's P/E ratio is 20.76. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to EXPE's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to EXPE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check EXPE's competition here
TNL vs SABRP Comparison February 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.9B. In comparison, SABRP has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $75.42, while SABRP trades at $71.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas SABRP's P/E ratio is -35.87. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SABRP's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is more volatile compared to SABRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check SABRP's competition here
TNL vs NCLH Comparison February 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.9B. In comparison, NCLH has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $75.42, while NCLH trades at $23.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas NCLH's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to NCLH's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is more volatile compared to NCLH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check NCLH's competition here
TNL vs MMYT Comparison February 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.9B. In comparison, MMYT has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $75.42, while MMYT trades at $55.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas MMYT's P/E ratio is 107.69. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to MMYT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to MMYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check MMYT's competition here
TNL vs DESP Comparison February 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.9B. In comparison, DESP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $75.42, while DESP trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas DESP's P/E ratio is -650.00. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to DESP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is more volatile compared to DESP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check DESP's competition here
TNL vs TRIP Comparison February 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.9B. In comparison, TRIP has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $75.42, while TRIP trades at $10.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas TRIP's P/E ratio is 34.87. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to TRIP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to TRIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check TRIP's competition here
TNL vs LIND Comparison February 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.9B. In comparison, LIND has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $75.42, while LIND trades at $20.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas LIND's P/E ratio is -31.12. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to LIND's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is more volatile compared to LIND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check LIND's competition here
TNL vs NUTR Comparison February 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.9B. In comparison, NUTR has a market cap of 628.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $75.42, while NUTR trades at $41.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas NUTR's P/E ratio is -836.00. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to NUTR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is more volatile compared to NUTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check NUTR's competition here
TNL vs SABR Comparison February 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.9B. In comparison, SABR has a market cap of 386M. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $75.42, while SABR trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas SABR's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SABR's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to SABR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check SABR's competition here
TNL vs AHMA Comparison February 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.9B. In comparison, AHMA has a market cap of 225.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $75.42, while AHMA trades at $8.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas AHMA's P/E ratio is 189.50. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to AHMA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to AHMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check AHMA's competition here
TNL vs MRNOW Comparison February 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.9B. In comparison, MRNOW has a market cap of 110.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $75.42, while MRNOW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas MRNOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to MRNOW's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to MRNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check MRNOW's competition here
TNL vs YTRA Comparison February 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.9B. In comparison, YTRA has a market cap of 86.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $75.42, while YTRA trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas YTRA's P/E ratio is -72.00. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to YTRA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to YTRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check YTRA's competition here
TNL vs TOUR Comparison February 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.9B. In comparison, TOUR has a market cap of 26M. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $75.42, while TOUR trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas TOUR's P/E ratio is 9.48. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to TOUR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to TOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check TOUR's competition here
TNL vs NTRP Comparison February 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.9B. In comparison, NTRP has a market cap of 22.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $75.42, while NTRP trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas NTRP's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to NTRP's ROE of -2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to NTRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check NTRP's competition here
TNL vs MKGI Comparison February 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.9B. In comparison, MKGI has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $75.42, while MKGI trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas MKGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to MKGI's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to MKGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check MKGI's competition here
TNL vs JXG Comparison February 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.9B. In comparison, JXG has a market cap of 833.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $75.42, while JXG trades at $3.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas JXG's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to JXG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to JXG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check JXG's competition here
TNL vs MOND Comparison February 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.9B. In comparison, MOND has a market cap of 87.4K. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $75.42, while MOND trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas MOND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to MOND's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is more volatile compared to MOND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check MOND's competition here
TNL vs MONDW Comparison February 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.9B. In comparison, MONDW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $75.42, while MONDW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 12.61, whereas MONDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to MONDW's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to MONDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check MONDW's competition here