Trip.com Group Limited (TCOM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TCOM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCOM | $48.06 | +0.25% | 30.9B | 6.83 | $7.04 | N/A |
| BKNG | $167.49 | +1.64% | 129.8B | 22.10 | $7.58 | +0.94% |
| ABNB | $133.72 | +0.10% | 79.4B | 33.02 | $4.05 | N/A |
| RCL | $293.28 | +2.40% | 78.7B | 17.90 | $16.39 | +1.70% |
| VIK | $89.99 | +1.52% | 40B | 33.45 | $2.69 | N/A |
| EXPE | $227.18 | +0.79% | 26B | 20.07 | $11.32 | +0.78% |
| SABRP | $71.42 | -0.78% | 23.6B | -35.87 | -$1.99 | N/A |
| NCLH | $19.13 | +5.40% | 8.8B | 15.44 | $1.24 | N/A |
| TNL | $70.62 | +1.07% | 4.4B | 19.67 | $3.59 | +3.22% |
| MMYT | $45.17 | +1.76% | 4.3B | 125.47 | $0.36 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TCOM vs BKNG Comparison June 2026
TCOM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCOM stands at 30.9B. In comparison, BKNG has a market cap of 129.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCOM is priced at $48.06, while BKNG trades at $167.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCOM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.83, whereas BKNG's P/E ratio is 22.10. In terms of profitability, TCOM's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BKNG's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, TCOM is less volatile compared to BKNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCOM.Check BKNG's competition here
TCOM vs ABNB Comparison June 2026
TCOM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCOM stands at 30.9B. In comparison, ABNB has a market cap of 79.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCOM is priced at $48.06, while ABNB trades at $133.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCOM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.83, whereas ABNB's P/E ratio is 33.02. In terms of profitability, TCOM's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ABNB's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TCOM is less volatile compared to ABNB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCOM.Check ABNB's competition here
TCOM vs RCL Comparison June 2026
TCOM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCOM stands at 30.9B. In comparison, RCL has a market cap of 78.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TCOM is priced at $48.06, while RCL trades at $293.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCOM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.83, whereas RCL's P/E ratio is 17.90. In terms of profitability, TCOM's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RCL's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TCOM is less volatile compared to RCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCOM.Check RCL's competition here
TCOM vs VIK Comparison June 2026
TCOM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCOM stands at 30.9B. In comparison, VIK has a market cap of 40B. Regarding current trading prices, TCOM is priced at $48.06, while VIK trades at $89.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCOM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.83, whereas VIK's P/E ratio is 33.45. In terms of profitability, TCOM's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VIK's ROE of +1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TCOM is more volatile compared to VIK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCOM.Check VIK's competition here
TCOM vs EXPE Comparison June 2026
TCOM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCOM stands at 30.9B. In comparison, EXPE has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, TCOM is priced at $48.06, while EXPE trades at $227.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCOM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.83, whereas EXPE's P/E ratio is 20.07. In terms of profitability, TCOM's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EXPE's ROE of +1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TCOM is less volatile compared to EXPE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCOM.Check EXPE's competition here
TCOM vs SABRP Comparison June 2026
TCOM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCOM stands at 30.9B. In comparison, SABRP has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TCOM is priced at $48.06, while SABRP trades at $71.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCOM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.83, whereas SABRP's P/E ratio is -35.87. In terms of profitability, TCOM's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SABRP's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TCOM is more volatile compared to SABRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCOM.Check SABRP's competition here
TCOM vs NCLH Comparison June 2026
TCOM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCOM stands at 30.9B. In comparison, NCLH has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TCOM is priced at $48.06, while NCLH trades at $19.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCOM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.83, whereas NCLH's P/E ratio is 15.44. In terms of profitability, TCOM's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NCLH's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TCOM is less volatile compared to NCLH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCOM.Check NCLH's competition here
TCOM vs TNL Comparison June 2026
TCOM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCOM stands at 30.9B. In comparison, TNL has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TCOM is priced at $48.06, while TNL trades at $70.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCOM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.83, whereas TNL's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, TCOM's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TNL's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TCOM is more volatile compared to TNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCOM.Check TNL's competition here
TCOM vs MMYT Comparison June 2026
TCOM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCOM stands at 30.9B. In comparison, MMYT has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TCOM is priced at $48.06, while MMYT trades at $45.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCOM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.83, whereas MMYT's P/E ratio is 125.47. In terms of profitability, TCOM's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MMYT's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TCOM is less volatile compared to MMYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCOM.Check MMYT's competition here
TCOM vs DESP Comparison June 2026
TCOM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCOM stands at 30.9B. In comparison, DESP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TCOM is priced at $48.06, while DESP trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCOM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.83, whereas DESP's P/E ratio is -650.00. In terms of profitability, TCOM's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DESP's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, TCOM is more volatile compared to DESP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCOM.Check DESP's competition here
TCOM vs LIND Comparison June 2026
TCOM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCOM stands at 30.9B. In comparison, LIND has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TCOM is priced at $48.06, while LIND trades at $22.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCOM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.83, whereas LIND's P/E ratio is -41.09. In terms of profitability, TCOM's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LIND's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TCOM is less volatile compared to LIND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCOM.Check LIND's competition here
TCOM vs SABR Comparison June 2026
TCOM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCOM stands at 30.9B. In comparison, SABR has a market cap of 731.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TCOM is priced at $48.06, while SABR trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCOM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.83, whereas SABR's P/E ratio is -2.98. In terms of profitability, TCOM's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SABR's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TCOM is less volatile compared to SABR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCOM.Check SABR's competition here
TCOM vs NUTR Comparison June 2026
TCOM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCOM stands at 30.9B. In comparison, NUTR has a market cap of 628.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TCOM is priced at $48.06, while NUTR trades at $41.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCOM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.83, whereas NUTR's P/E ratio is -836.00. In terms of profitability, TCOM's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NUTR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TCOM is more volatile compared to NUTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCOM.Check NUTR's competition here
TCOM vs MRNOW Comparison June 2026
TCOM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCOM stands at 30.9B. In comparison, MRNOW has a market cap of 69.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TCOM is priced at $48.06, while MRNOW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCOM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.83, whereas MRNOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCOM's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MRNOW's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TCOM is less volatile compared to MRNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCOM.Check MRNOW's competition here
TCOM vs YTRA Comparison June 2026
TCOM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCOM stands at 30.9B. In comparison, YTRA has a market cap of 55.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TCOM is priced at $48.06, while YTRA trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCOM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.83, whereas YTRA's P/E ratio is -45.62. In terms of profitability, TCOM's ROE is +0.21%, compared to YTRA's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TCOM is less volatile compared to YTRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCOM.Check YTRA's competition here
TCOM vs AHMA Comparison June 2026
TCOM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCOM stands at 30.9B. In comparison, AHMA has a market cap of 31.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TCOM is priced at $48.06, while AHMA trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCOM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.83, whereas AHMA's P/E ratio is 26.50. In terms of profitability, TCOM's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AHMA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TCOM is less volatile compared to AHMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCOM.Check AHMA's competition here
TCOM vs TOUR Comparison June 2026
TCOM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCOM stands at 30.9B. In comparison, TOUR has a market cap of 20.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TCOM is priced at $48.06, while TOUR trades at $5.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCOM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.83, whereas TOUR's P/E ratio is 13.93. In terms of profitability, TCOM's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TOUR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TCOM is less volatile compared to TOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCOM.Check TOUR's competition here
TCOM vs NTRP Comparison June 2026
TCOM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCOM stands at 30.9B. In comparison, NTRP has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TCOM is priced at $48.06, while NTRP trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCOM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.83, whereas NTRP's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, TCOM's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NTRP's ROE of -2.62%. Regarding short-term risk, TCOM is less volatile compared to NTRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCOM.Check NTRP's competition here
TCOM vs MKGI Comparison June 2026
TCOM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCOM stands at 30.9B. In comparison, MKGI has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TCOM is priced at $48.06, while MKGI trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCOM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.83, whereas MKGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCOM's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MKGI's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TCOM is less volatile compared to MKGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCOM.Check MKGI's competition here
TCOM vs JXG Comparison June 2026
TCOM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCOM stands at 30.9B. In comparison, JXG has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TCOM is priced at $48.06, while JXG trades at $8.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCOM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.83, whereas JXG's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, TCOM's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JXG's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TCOM is less volatile compared to JXG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCOM.Check JXG's competition here
TCOM vs MOND Comparison June 2026
TCOM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCOM stands at 30.9B. In comparison, MOND has a market cap of 87.4K. Regarding current trading prices, TCOM is priced at $48.06, while MOND trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCOM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.83, whereas MOND's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TCOM's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MOND's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TCOM is more volatile compared to MOND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCOM.Check MOND's competition here
TCOM vs MONDW Comparison June 2026
TCOM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCOM stands at 30.9B. In comparison, MONDW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TCOM is priced at $48.06, while MONDW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCOM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.83, whereas MONDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCOM's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MONDW's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TCOM is less volatile compared to MONDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCOM.Check MONDW's competition here
TCOM vs SGLBW Comparison June 2026
TCOM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TCOM stands at 30.9B. In comparison, SGLBW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TCOM is priced at $48.06, while SGLBW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TCOM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.83, whereas SGLBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TCOM's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SGLBW's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, TCOM is less volatile compared to SGLBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TCOM.Check SGLBW's competition here