Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. (NCLH) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NCLH) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NCLH | $18.34 | +0.33% | 8.4B | 14.79 | $1.24 | N/A |
| BKNG | $167.43 | -1.41% | 129.7B | 22.09 | $7.58 | +0.93% |
| ABNB | $133.31 | -0.88% | 79.1B | 32.92 | $4.05 | N/A |
| RCL | $284.63 | +1.19% | 76.4B | 17.36 | $16.40 | +1.48% |
| VIK | $92.11 | -0.25% | 40.9B | 34.24 | $2.69 | N/A |
| TCOM | $47.43 | +0.74% | 30.5B | 6.76 | $7.02 | N/A |
| EXPE | $225.79 | -0.77% | 25.8B | 19.93 | $11.33 | +0.78% |
| SABRP | $71.42 | -0.78% | 23.6B | -35.87 | -$1.99 | N/A |
| MMYT | $46.74 | -1.25% | 4.4B | 129.83 | $0.36 | N/A |
| TNL | $68.00 | -0.44% | 4.2B | 18.94 | $3.59 | +3.34% |
Stock Comparison
NCLH vs BKNG Comparison June 2026
NCLH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCLH stands at 8.4B. In comparison, BKNG has a market cap of 129.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NCLH is priced at $18.34, while BKNG trades at $167.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCLH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas BKNG's P/E ratio is 22.09. In terms of profitability, NCLH's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BKNG's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, NCLH is more volatile compared to BKNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCLH.Check BKNG's competition here
NCLH vs ABNB Comparison June 2026
NCLH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCLH stands at 8.4B. In comparison, ABNB has a market cap of 79.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NCLH is priced at $18.34, while ABNB trades at $133.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCLH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas ABNB's P/E ratio is 32.92. In terms of profitability, NCLH's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ABNB's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NCLH is more volatile compared to ABNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCLH.Check ABNB's competition here
NCLH vs RCL Comparison June 2026
NCLH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCLH stands at 8.4B. In comparison, RCL has a market cap of 76.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NCLH is priced at $18.34, while RCL trades at $284.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCLH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas RCL's P/E ratio is 17.36. In terms of profitability, NCLH's ROE is +0.27%, compared to RCL's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, NCLH is less volatile compared to RCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCLH.Check RCL's competition here
NCLH vs VIK Comparison June 2026
NCLH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCLH stands at 8.4B. In comparison, VIK has a market cap of 40.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NCLH is priced at $18.34, while VIK trades at $92.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCLH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas VIK's P/E ratio is 34.24. In terms of profitability, NCLH's ROE is +0.27%, compared to VIK's ROE of +1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, NCLH is more volatile compared to VIK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCLH.Check VIK's competition here
NCLH vs TCOM Comparison June 2026
NCLH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCLH stands at 8.4B. In comparison, TCOM has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NCLH is priced at $18.34, while TCOM trades at $47.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCLH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas TCOM's P/E ratio is 6.76. In terms of profitability, NCLH's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TCOM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NCLH is less volatile compared to TCOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCLH.Check TCOM's competition here
NCLH vs EXPE Comparison June 2026
NCLH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCLH stands at 8.4B. In comparison, EXPE has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NCLH is priced at $18.34, while EXPE trades at $225.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCLH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas EXPE's P/E ratio is 19.93. In terms of profitability, NCLH's ROE is +0.27%, compared to EXPE's ROE of +1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, NCLH is more volatile compared to EXPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCLH.Check EXPE's competition here
NCLH vs SABRP Comparison June 2026
NCLH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCLH stands at 8.4B. In comparison, SABRP has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NCLH is priced at $18.34, while SABRP trades at $71.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCLH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas SABRP's P/E ratio is -35.87. In terms of profitability, NCLH's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SABRP's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, NCLH is more volatile compared to SABRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCLH.Check SABRP's competition here
NCLH vs MMYT Comparison June 2026
NCLH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCLH stands at 8.4B. In comparison, MMYT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NCLH is priced at $18.34, while MMYT trades at $46.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCLH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas MMYT's P/E ratio is 129.83. In terms of profitability, NCLH's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MMYT's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NCLH is less volatile compared to MMYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCLH.Check MMYT's competition here
NCLH vs TNL Comparison June 2026
NCLH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCLH stands at 8.4B. In comparison, TNL has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NCLH is priced at $18.34, while TNL trades at $68.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCLH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas TNL's P/E ratio is 18.94. In terms of profitability, NCLH's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TNL's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NCLH is more volatile compared to TNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCLH.Check TNL's competition here
NCLH vs DESP Comparison June 2026
NCLH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCLH stands at 8.4B. In comparison, DESP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NCLH is priced at $18.34, while DESP trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCLH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas DESP's P/E ratio is -650.00. In terms of profitability, NCLH's ROE is +0.27%, compared to DESP's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, NCLH is more volatile compared to DESP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCLH.Check DESP's competition here
NCLH vs LIND Comparison June 2026
NCLH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCLH stands at 8.4B. In comparison, LIND has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NCLH is priced at $18.34, while LIND trades at $22.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCLH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas LIND's P/E ratio is -42.50. In terms of profitability, NCLH's ROE is +0.27%, compared to LIND's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NCLH is less volatile compared to LIND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCLH.Check LIND's competition here
NCLH vs SABR Comparison June 2026
NCLH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCLH stands at 8.4B. In comparison, SABR has a market cap of 695.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NCLH is priced at $18.34, while SABR trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCLH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas SABR's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, NCLH's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SABR's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, NCLH is less volatile compared to SABR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCLH.Check SABR's competition here
NCLH vs NUTR Comparison June 2026
NCLH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCLH stands at 8.4B. In comparison, NUTR has a market cap of 628.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NCLH is priced at $18.34, while NUTR trades at $41.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCLH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas NUTR's P/E ratio is -836.00. In terms of profitability, NCLH's ROE is +0.27%, compared to NUTR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NCLH is more volatile compared to NUTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCLH.Check NUTR's competition here
NCLH vs MRNOW Comparison June 2026
NCLH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCLH stands at 8.4B. In comparison, MRNOW has a market cap of 79.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NCLH is priced at $18.34, while MRNOW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCLH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas MRNOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NCLH's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MRNOW's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NCLH is less volatile compared to MRNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCLH.Check MRNOW's competition here
NCLH vs YTRA Comparison June 2026
NCLH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCLH stands at 8.4B. In comparison, YTRA has a market cap of 57.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NCLH is priced at $18.34, while YTRA trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCLH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas YTRA's P/E ratio is -47.50. In terms of profitability, NCLH's ROE is +0.27%, compared to YTRA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NCLH is less volatile compared to YTRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCLH.Check YTRA's competition here
NCLH vs AHMA Comparison June 2026
NCLH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCLH stands at 8.4B. In comparison, AHMA has a market cap of 35.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NCLH is priced at $18.34, while AHMA trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCLH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas AHMA's P/E ratio is 30.00. In terms of profitability, NCLH's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AHMA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NCLH is less volatile compared to AHMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCLH.Check AHMA's competition here
NCLH vs TOUR Comparison June 2026
NCLH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCLH stands at 8.4B. In comparison, TOUR has a market cap of 21.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NCLH is priced at $18.34, while TOUR trades at $5.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCLH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas TOUR's P/E ratio is 14.78. In terms of profitability, NCLH's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TOUR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NCLH is less volatile compared to TOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCLH.Check TOUR's competition here
NCLH vs NTRP Comparison June 2026
NCLH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCLH stands at 8.4B. In comparison, NTRP has a market cap of 16.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NCLH is priced at $18.34, while NTRP trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCLH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas NTRP's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, NCLH's ROE is +0.27%, compared to NTRP's ROE of -2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NCLH is less volatile compared to NTRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCLH.Check NTRP's competition here
NCLH vs MKGI Comparison June 2026
NCLH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCLH stands at 8.4B. In comparison, MKGI has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NCLH is priced at $18.34, while MKGI trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCLH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas MKGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NCLH's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MKGI's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NCLH is less volatile compared to MKGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCLH.Check MKGI's competition here
NCLH vs JXG Comparison June 2026
NCLH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCLH stands at 8.4B. In comparison, JXG has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, NCLH is priced at $18.34, while JXG trades at $8.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCLH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas JXG's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, NCLH's ROE is +0.27%, compared to JXG's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, NCLH is less volatile compared to JXG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCLH.Check JXG's competition here
NCLH vs MOND Comparison June 2026
NCLH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCLH stands at 8.4B. In comparison, MOND has a market cap of 87.4K. Regarding current trading prices, NCLH is priced at $18.34, while MOND trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCLH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas MOND's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NCLH's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MOND's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NCLH is more volatile compared to MOND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCLH.Check MOND's competition here
NCLH vs MONDW Comparison June 2026
NCLH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCLH stands at 8.4B. In comparison, MONDW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NCLH is priced at $18.34, while MONDW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCLH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas MONDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NCLH's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MONDW's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NCLH is less volatile compared to MONDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCLH.Check MONDW's competition here
NCLH vs SGLBW Comparison June 2026
NCLH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCLH stands at 8.4B. In comparison, SGLBW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NCLH is priced at $18.34, while SGLBW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCLH currently has a P/E ratio of 14.79, whereas SGLBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NCLH's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SGLBW's ROE of -2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NCLH is less volatile compared to SGLBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCLH.Check SGLBW's competition here