Monaker Group, Inc. (MKGI) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MKGI) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MKGI | $2.27 | +7.08% | 13.5M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| BKNG | $179.07 | -1.44% | 139.1B | 19.32 | $9.29 | +0.90% |
| ABNB | $144.39 | -1.09% | 86B | 35.70 | $4.06 | N/A |
| RCL | $285.41 | -0.54% | 76.8B | 17.32 | $16.53 | +1.75% |
| VIK | $97.65 | +0.62% | 43.1B | 35.25 | $2.75 | N/A |
| CCL | $25.99 | -1.59% | 35.7B | 10.95 | $2.38 | +1.15% |
| EXPE | $267.26 | -0.56% | 30.4B | 15.10 | $17.55 | +0.66% |
| TCOM | $43.96 | +3.55% | 27.8B | 6.88 | $6.42 | N/A |
| SABRP | $71.42 | -0.78% | 23.6B | -35.87 | -$1.99 | N/A |
| NCLH | $19.38 | -0.41% | 9B | 8.78 | $2.22 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MKGI vs BKNG Comparison July 2026
MKGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKGI stands at 13.5M. In comparison, BKNG has a market cap of 139.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MKGI is priced at $2.27, while BKNG trades at $179.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKGI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKNG's P/E ratio is 19.32. In terms of profitability, MKGI's ROE is -1.30%, compared to BKNG's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, MKGI is more volatile compared to BKNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKGI.Check BKNG's competition here
MKGI vs ABNB Comparison July 2026
MKGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKGI stands at 13.5M. In comparison, ABNB has a market cap of 86B. Regarding current trading prices, MKGI is priced at $2.27, while ABNB trades at $144.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKGI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABNB's P/E ratio is 35.70. In terms of profitability, MKGI's ROE is -1.30%, compared to ABNB's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MKGI is more volatile compared to ABNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKGI.Check ABNB's competition here
MKGI vs RCL Comparison July 2026
MKGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKGI stands at 13.5M. In comparison, RCL has a market cap of 76.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MKGI is priced at $2.27, while RCL trades at $285.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKGI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RCL's P/E ratio is 17.32. In terms of profitability, MKGI's ROE is -1.30%, compared to RCL's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MKGI is more volatile compared to RCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKGI.Check RCL's competition here
MKGI vs VIK Comparison July 2026
MKGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKGI stands at 13.5M. In comparison, VIK has a market cap of 43.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MKGI is priced at $2.27, while VIK trades at $97.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKGI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIK's P/E ratio is 35.25. In terms of profitability, MKGI's ROE is -1.30%, compared to VIK's ROE of +1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, MKGI is more volatile compared to VIK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKGI.Check VIK's competition here
MKGI vs CCL Comparison July 2026
MKGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKGI stands at 13.5M. In comparison, CCL has a market cap of 35.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MKGI is priced at $2.27, while CCL trades at $25.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKGI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCL's P/E ratio is 10.95. In terms of profitability, MKGI's ROE is -1.30%, compared to CCL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MKGI is more volatile compared to CCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKGI.Check CCL's competition here
MKGI vs EXPE Comparison July 2026
MKGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKGI stands at 13.5M. In comparison, EXPE has a market cap of 30.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MKGI is priced at $2.27, while EXPE trades at $267.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKGI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXPE's P/E ratio is 15.10. In terms of profitability, MKGI's ROE is -1.30%, compared to EXPE's ROE of +1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MKGI is more volatile compared to EXPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKGI.Check EXPE's competition here
MKGI vs TCOM Comparison July 2026
MKGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKGI stands at 13.5M. In comparison, TCOM has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MKGI is priced at $2.27, while TCOM trades at $43.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKGI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCOM's P/E ratio is 6.88. In terms of profitability, MKGI's ROE is -1.30%, compared to TCOM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MKGI is more volatile compared to TCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKGI.Check TCOM's competition here
MKGI vs SABRP Comparison July 2026
MKGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKGI stands at 13.5M. In comparison, SABRP has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MKGI is priced at $2.27, while SABRP trades at $71.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKGI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SABRP's P/E ratio is -35.87. In terms of profitability, MKGI's ROE is -1.30%, compared to SABRP's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MKGI is more volatile compared to SABRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKGI.Check SABRP's competition here
MKGI vs NCLH Comparison July 2026
MKGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKGI stands at 13.5M. In comparison, NCLH has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, MKGI is priced at $2.27, while NCLH trades at $19.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKGI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCLH's P/E ratio is 8.78. In terms of profitability, MKGI's ROE is -1.30%, compared to NCLH's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MKGI is more volatile compared to NCLH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKGI.Check NCLH's competition here
MKGI vs MMYT Comparison July 2026
MKGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKGI stands at 13.5M. In comparison, MMYT has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, MKGI is priced at $2.27, while MMYT trades at $53.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKGI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MMYT's P/E ratio is 35.72. In terms of profitability, MKGI's ROE is -1.30%, compared to MMYT's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MKGI is more volatile compared to MMYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKGI.Check MMYT's competition here
MKGI vs TNL Comparison July 2026
MKGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKGI stands at 13.5M. In comparison, TNL has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MKGI is priced at $2.27, while TNL trades at $72.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKGI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TNL's P/E ratio is 10.78. In terms of profitability, MKGI's ROE is -1.30%, compared to TNL's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MKGI is more volatile compared to TNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKGI.Check TNL's competition here
MKGI vs DESP Comparison July 2026
MKGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKGI stands at 13.5M. In comparison, DESP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MKGI is priced at $2.27, while DESP trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKGI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DESP's P/E ratio is -650.00. In terms of profitability, MKGI's ROE is -1.30%, compared to DESP's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, MKGI is more volatile compared to DESP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKGI.Check DESP's competition here
MKGI vs LIND Comparison July 2026
MKGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKGI stands at 13.5M. In comparison, LIND has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MKGI is priced at $2.27, while LIND trades at $27.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKGI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LIND's P/E ratio is -131.43. In terms of profitability, MKGI's ROE is -1.30%, compared to LIND's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MKGI is more volatile compared to LIND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKGI.Check LIND's competition here
MKGI vs NUTR Comparison July 2026
MKGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKGI stands at 13.5M. In comparison, NUTR has a market cap of 628.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MKGI is priced at $2.27, while NUTR trades at $41.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKGI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NUTR's P/E ratio is 54.68. In terms of profitability, MKGI's ROE is -1.30%, compared to NUTR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MKGI is more volatile compared to NUTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKGI.Check NUTR's competition here
MKGI vs YTRA Comparison July 2026
MKGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKGI stands at 13.5M. In comparison, YTRA has a market cap of 53.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MKGI is priced at $2.27, while YTRA trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKGI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YTRA's P/E ratio is -22.25. In terms of profitability, MKGI's ROE is -1.30%, compared to YTRA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MKGI is more volatile compared to YTRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKGI.Check YTRA's competition here
MKGI vs AHMA Comparison July 2026
MKGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKGI stands at 13.5M. In comparison, AHMA has a market cap of 48.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MKGI is priced at $2.27, while AHMA trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKGI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AHMA's P/E ratio is 40.75. In terms of profitability, MKGI's ROE is -1.30%, compared to AHMA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MKGI is more volatile compared to AHMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKGI.Check AHMA's competition here
MKGI vs MRNOW Comparison July 2026
MKGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKGI stands at 13.5M. In comparison, MRNOW has a market cap of 39.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MKGI is priced at $2.27, while MRNOW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKGI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRNOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKGI's ROE is -1.30%, compared to MRNOW's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MKGI is less volatile compared to MRNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKGI.Check MRNOW's competition here
MKGI vs TOUR Comparison July 2026
MKGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKGI stands at 13.5M. In comparison, TOUR has a market cap of 19.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MKGI is priced at $2.27, while TOUR trades at $5.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKGI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOUR's P/E ratio is 32.52. In terms of profitability, MKGI's ROE is -1.30%, compared to TOUR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MKGI is more volatile compared to TOUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKGI.Check TOUR's competition here
MKGI vs JXG Comparison July 2026
MKGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKGI stands at 13.5M. In comparison, JXG has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MKGI is priced at $2.27, while JXG trades at $6.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKGI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JXG's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, MKGI's ROE is -1.30%, compared to JXG's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, MKGI is more volatile compared to JXG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKGI.Check JXG's competition here
MKGI vs MONDW Comparison July 2026
MKGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKGI stands at 13.5M. In comparison, MONDW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MKGI is priced at $2.27, while MONDW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKGI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MONDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKGI's ROE is -1.30%, compared to MONDW's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MKGI is less volatile compared to MONDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKGI.Check MONDW's competition here
MKGI vs SGLBW Comparison July 2026
MKGI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKGI stands at 13.5M. In comparison, SGLBW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MKGI is priced at $2.27, while SGLBW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKGI currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGLBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKGI's ROE is -1.30%, compared to SGLBW's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, MKGI is less volatile compared to SGLBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKGI.Check SGLBW's competition here