Ambitions Enterprise Management Co. L.L.C (AHMA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AHMA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AHMA | $1.71 | -3.39% | 50.8M | 42.75 | $0.04 | N/A |
| BKNG | $181.46 | +2.49% | 140.6B | 19.53 | $9.29 | +0.88% |
| ABNB | $145.56 | +2.59% | 86.4B | 35.85 | $4.06 | N/A |
| RCL | $318.13 | -1.40% | 85.4B | 19.26 | $16.53 | +1.56% |
| VIK | $103.26 | +0.35% | 45.9B | 37.56 | $2.75 | N/A |
| EXPE | $262.80 | +4.72% | 30.1B | 14.97 | $17.55 | +0.67% |
| TCOM | $40.89 | +0.99% | 25.7B | 6.37 | $6.42 | N/A |
| SABRP | $71.42 | -0.78% | 23.6B | -35.87 | -$1.99 | N/A |
| NCLH | $21.24 | +1.24% | 9.8B | 9.57 | $2.22 | N/A |
| MMYT | $53.38 | +2.40% | 5.1B | 35.83 | $1.49 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
AHMA vs BKNG Comparison June 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 50.8M. In comparison, BKNG has a market cap of 140.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.71, while BKNG trades at $181.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 42.75, whereas BKNG's P/E ratio is 19.53. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BKNG's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is more volatile compared to BKNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check BKNG's competition here
AHMA vs ABNB Comparison June 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 50.8M. In comparison, ABNB has a market cap of 86.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.71, while ABNB trades at $145.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 42.75, whereas ABNB's P/E ratio is 35.85. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ABNB's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is more volatile compared to ABNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check ABNB's competition here
AHMA vs RCL Comparison June 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 50.8M. In comparison, RCL has a market cap of 85.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.71, while RCL trades at $318.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 42.75, whereas RCL's P/E ratio is 19.26. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RCL's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is more volatile compared to RCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check RCL's competition here
AHMA vs VIK Comparison June 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 50.8M. In comparison, VIK has a market cap of 45.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.71, while VIK trades at $103.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 42.75, whereas VIK's P/E ratio is 37.56. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VIK's ROE of +1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is more volatile compared to VIK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check VIK's competition here
AHMA vs EXPE Comparison June 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 50.8M. In comparison, EXPE has a market cap of 30.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.71, while EXPE trades at $262.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 42.75, whereas EXPE's P/E ratio is 14.97. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EXPE's ROE of +1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is more volatile compared to EXPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check EXPE's competition here
AHMA vs TCOM Comparison June 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 50.8M. In comparison, TCOM has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.71, while TCOM trades at $40.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 42.75, whereas TCOM's P/E ratio is 6.37. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TCOM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is more volatile compared to TCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check TCOM's competition here
AHMA vs SABRP Comparison June 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 50.8M. In comparison, SABRP has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.71, while SABRP trades at $71.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 42.75, whereas SABRP's P/E ratio is -35.87. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SABRP's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is more volatile compared to SABRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check SABRP's competition here
AHMA vs NCLH Comparison June 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 50.8M. In comparison, NCLH has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.71, while NCLH trades at $21.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 42.75, whereas NCLH's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NCLH's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is more volatile compared to NCLH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check NCLH's competition here
AHMA vs MMYT Comparison June 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 50.8M. In comparison, MMYT has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.71, while MMYT trades at $53.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 42.75, whereas MMYT's P/E ratio is 35.83. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MMYT's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is more volatile compared to MMYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check MMYT's competition here
AHMA vs TNL Comparison June 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 50.8M. In comparison, TNL has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.71, while TNL trades at $78.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 42.75, whereas TNL's P/E ratio is 11.60. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TNL's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is more volatile compared to TNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check TNL's competition here
AHMA vs DESP Comparison June 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 50.8M. In comparison, DESP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.71, while DESP trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 42.75, whereas DESP's P/E ratio is -650.00. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DESP's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is more volatile compared to DESP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check DESP's competition here
AHMA vs LIND Comparison June 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 50.8M. In comparison, LIND has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.71, while LIND trades at $29.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 42.75, whereas LIND's P/E ratio is -140.81. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LIND's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is more volatile compared to LIND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check LIND's competition here
AHMA vs SABR Comparison June 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 50.8M. In comparison, SABR has a market cap of 786.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.71, while SABR trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 42.75, whereas SABR's P/E ratio is 99.50. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SABR's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is more volatile compared to SABR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check SABR's competition here
AHMA vs NUTR Comparison June 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 50.8M. In comparison, NUTR has a market cap of 628.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.71, while NUTR trades at $41.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 42.75, whereas NUTR's P/E ratio is -836.00. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NUTR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is more volatile compared to NUTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check NUTR's competition here
AHMA vs YTRA Comparison June 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 50.8M. In comparison, YTRA has a market cap of 52.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.71, while YTRA trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 42.75, whereas YTRA's P/E ratio is -21.75. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to YTRA's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is more volatile compared to YTRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check YTRA's competition here
AHMA vs MRNOW Comparison June 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 50.8M. In comparison, MRNOW has a market cap of 29.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.71, while MRNOW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 42.75, whereas MRNOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MRNOW's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is less volatile compared to MRNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check MRNOW's competition here
AHMA vs TOUR Comparison June 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 50.8M. In comparison, TOUR has a market cap of 17.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.71, while TOUR trades at $4.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 42.75, whereas TOUR's P/E ratio is 29.18. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TOUR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is more volatile compared to TOUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check TOUR's competition here
AHMA vs MKGI Comparison June 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 50.8M. In comparison, MKGI has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.71, while MKGI trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 42.75, whereas MKGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MKGI's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is more volatile compared to MKGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check MKGI's competition here
AHMA vs JXG Comparison June 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 50.8M. In comparison, JXG has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.71, while JXG trades at $10.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 42.75, whereas JXG's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JXG's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is less volatile compared to JXG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check JXG's competition here
AHMA vs SGLBW Comparison June 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 50.8M. In comparison, SGLBW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.71, while SGLBW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 42.75, whereas SGLBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SGLBW's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is less volatile compared to SGLBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check SGLBW's competition here
AHMA vs MONDW Comparison June 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 50.8M. In comparison, MONDW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.71, while MONDW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 42.75, whereas MONDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MONDW's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is less volatile compared to MONDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check MONDW's competition here