Ambitions Enterprise Management Co. L.L.C (AHMA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AHMA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AHMA | $1.06 | -11.67% | 31.5M | 26.50 | $0.04 | N/A |
| BKNG | $164.78 | -1.45% | 127.7B | 21.74 | $7.58 | +0.95% |
| ABNB | $133.59 | -0.57% | 79.3B | 32.99 | $4.05 | N/A |
| RCL | $286.42 | -1.51% | 76.8B | 17.48 | $16.39 | +1.74% |
| VIK | $88.64 | -0.99% | 39.4B | 32.94 | $2.69 | N/A |
| TCOM | $47.94 | -1.09% | 30.8B | 6.81 | $7.04 | N/A |
| EXPE | $225.41 | -0.42% | 25.8B | 19.91 | $11.32 | +0.79% |
| SABRP | $71.42 | -0.78% | 23.6B | -35.87 | -$1.99 | N/A |
| NCLH | $18.15 | +0.11% | 8.3B | 14.64 | $1.24 | N/A |
| TNL | $69.87 | -2.38% | 4.4B | 19.46 | $3.59 | +3.25% |
Stock Comparison
AHMA vs BKNG Comparison June 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 31.5M. In comparison, BKNG has a market cap of 127.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.06, while BKNG trades at $164.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas BKNG's P/E ratio is 21.74. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BKNG's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is more volatile compared to BKNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check BKNG's competition here
AHMA vs ABNB Comparison June 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 31.5M. In comparison, ABNB has a market cap of 79.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.06, while ABNB trades at $133.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas ABNB's P/E ratio is 32.99. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ABNB's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is more volatile compared to ABNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check ABNB's competition here
AHMA vs RCL Comparison June 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 31.5M. In comparison, RCL has a market cap of 76.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.06, while RCL trades at $286.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas RCL's P/E ratio is 17.48. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RCL's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is more volatile compared to RCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check RCL's competition here
AHMA vs VIK Comparison June 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 31.5M. In comparison, VIK has a market cap of 39.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.06, while VIK trades at $88.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas VIK's P/E ratio is 32.94. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VIK's ROE of +1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is more volatile compared to VIK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check VIK's competition here
AHMA vs TCOM Comparison June 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 31.5M. In comparison, TCOM has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.06, while TCOM trades at $47.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas TCOM's P/E ratio is 6.81. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TCOM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is more volatile compared to TCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check TCOM's competition here
AHMA vs EXPE Comparison June 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 31.5M. In comparison, EXPE has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.06, while EXPE trades at $225.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas EXPE's P/E ratio is 19.91. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EXPE's ROE of +1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is more volatile compared to EXPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check EXPE's competition here
AHMA vs SABRP Comparison June 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 31.5M. In comparison, SABRP has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.06, while SABRP trades at $71.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas SABRP's P/E ratio is -35.87. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SABRP's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is more volatile compared to SABRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check SABRP's competition here
AHMA vs NCLH Comparison June 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 31.5M. In comparison, NCLH has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.06, while NCLH trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas NCLH's P/E ratio is 14.64. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NCLH's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is more volatile compared to NCLH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check NCLH's competition here
AHMA vs TNL Comparison June 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 31.5M. In comparison, TNL has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.06, while TNL trades at $69.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas TNL's P/E ratio is 19.46. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TNL's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is more volatile compared to TNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check TNL's competition here
AHMA vs MMYT Comparison June 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 31.5M. In comparison, MMYT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.06, while MMYT trades at $44.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas MMYT's P/E ratio is 123.31. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MMYT's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is more volatile compared to MMYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check MMYT's competition here
AHMA vs DESP Comparison June 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 31.5M. In comparison, DESP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.06, while DESP trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas DESP's P/E ratio is -650.00. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DESP's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is more volatile compared to DESP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check DESP's competition here
AHMA vs LIND Comparison June 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 31.5M. In comparison, LIND has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.06, while LIND trades at $21.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas LIND's P/E ratio is -40.26. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LIND's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is more volatile compared to LIND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check LIND's competition here
AHMA vs SABR Comparison June 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 31.5M. In comparison, SABR has a market cap of 727.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.06, while SABR trades at $1.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas SABR's P/E ratio is -2.97. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SABR's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is more volatile compared to SABR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check SABR's competition here
AHMA vs NUTR Comparison June 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 31.5M. In comparison, NUTR has a market cap of 628.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.06, while NUTR trades at $41.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas NUTR's P/E ratio is -836.00. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NUTR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is more volatile compared to NUTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check NUTR's competition here
AHMA vs MRNOW Comparison June 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 31.5M. In comparison, MRNOW has a market cap of 72.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.06, while MRNOW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas MRNOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MRNOW's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is less volatile compared to MRNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check MRNOW's competition here
AHMA vs YTRA Comparison June 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 31.5M. In comparison, YTRA has a market cap of 56.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.06, while YTRA trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas YTRA's P/E ratio is -46.62. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to YTRA's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is more volatile compared to YTRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check YTRA's competition here
AHMA vs TOUR Comparison June 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 31.5M. In comparison, TOUR has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.06, while TOUR trades at $5.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas TOUR's P/E ratio is 13.77. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TOUR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is more volatile compared to TOUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check TOUR's competition here
AHMA vs NTRP Comparison June 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 31.5M. In comparison, NTRP has a market cap of 17M. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.06, while NTRP trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas NTRP's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NTRP's ROE of -2.62%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is more volatile compared to NTRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check NTRP's competition here
AHMA vs MKGI Comparison June 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 31.5M. In comparison, MKGI has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.06, while MKGI trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas MKGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MKGI's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is more volatile compared to MKGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check MKGI's competition here
AHMA vs JXG Comparison June 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 31.5M. In comparison, JXG has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.06, while JXG trades at $8.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas JXG's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JXG's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is more volatile compared to JXG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check JXG's competition here
AHMA vs MOND Comparison June 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 31.5M. In comparison, MOND has a market cap of 87.4K. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.06, while MOND trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas MOND's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MOND's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is more volatile compared to MOND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check MOND's competition here
AHMA vs MONDW Comparison June 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 31.5M. In comparison, MONDW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.06, while MONDW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas MONDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MONDW's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is less volatile compared to MONDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check MONDW's competition here
AHMA vs SGLBW Comparison June 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 31.5M. In comparison, SGLBW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.06, while SGLBW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.50, whereas SGLBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SGLBW's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is less volatile compared to SGLBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check SGLBW's competition here