Ambitions Enterprise Management Co. L.L.C (AHMA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AHMA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AHMA | $1.72 | +0.00% | 51.1M | 43.00 | $0.04 | N/A |
| BKNG | $181.68 | -1.59% | 140.8B | 19.56 | $9.29 | +0.89% |
| ABNB | $145.98 | -1.23% | 86.6B | 35.96 | $4.06 | N/A |
| RCL | $286.96 | -2.38% | 77B | 17.37 | $16.53 | +1.75% |
| VIK | $97.04 | -1.05% | 43.1B | 35.29 | $2.75 | N/A |
| CCL | $26.41 | -1.68% | 36.2B | 11.09 | $2.38 | +1.14% |
| EXPE | $268.77 | -0.80% | 30.8B | 15.31 | $17.55 | +0.66% |
| TCOM | $42.45 | -2.97% | 26.7B | 6.61 | $6.42 | N/A |
| SABRP | $71.42 | -0.78% | 23.6B | -35.87 | -$1.99 | N/A |
| NCLH | $19.46 | -0.76% | 8.9B | 8.76 | $2.22 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
AHMA vs BKNG Comparison July 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 51.1M. In comparison, BKNG has a market cap of 140.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.72, while BKNG trades at $181.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 43.00, whereas BKNG's P/E ratio is 19.56. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BKNG's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is more volatile compared to BKNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check BKNG's competition here
AHMA vs ABNB Comparison July 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 51.1M. In comparison, ABNB has a market cap of 86.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.72, while ABNB trades at $145.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 43.00, whereas ABNB's P/E ratio is 35.96. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ABNB's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is more volatile compared to ABNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check ABNB's competition here
AHMA vs RCL Comparison July 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 51.1M. In comparison, RCL has a market cap of 77B. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.72, while RCL trades at $286.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 43.00, whereas RCL's P/E ratio is 17.37. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RCL's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is more volatile compared to RCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check RCL's competition here
AHMA vs VIK Comparison July 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 51.1M. In comparison, VIK has a market cap of 43.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.72, while VIK trades at $97.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 43.00, whereas VIK's P/E ratio is 35.29. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VIK's ROE of +1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is more volatile compared to VIK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check VIK's competition here
AHMA vs CCL Comparison July 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 51.1M. In comparison, CCL has a market cap of 36.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.72, while CCL trades at $26.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 43.00, whereas CCL's P/E ratio is 11.09. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CCL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is more volatile compared to CCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check CCL's competition here
AHMA vs EXPE Comparison July 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 51.1M. In comparison, EXPE has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.72, while EXPE trades at $268.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 43.00, whereas EXPE's P/E ratio is 15.31. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EXPE's ROE of +1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is more volatile compared to EXPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check EXPE's competition here
AHMA vs TCOM Comparison July 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 51.1M. In comparison, TCOM has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.72, while TCOM trades at $42.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 43.00, whereas TCOM's P/E ratio is 6.61. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TCOM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is more volatile compared to TCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check TCOM's competition here
AHMA vs SABRP Comparison July 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 51.1M. In comparison, SABRP has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.72, while SABRP trades at $71.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 43.00, whereas SABRP's P/E ratio is -35.87. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SABRP's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is more volatile compared to SABRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check SABRP's competition here
AHMA vs NCLH Comparison July 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 51.1M. In comparison, NCLH has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.72, while NCLH trades at $19.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 43.00, whereas NCLH's P/E ratio is 8.76. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NCLH's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is more volatile compared to NCLH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check NCLH's competition here
AHMA vs MMYT Comparison July 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 51.1M. In comparison, MMYT has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.72, while MMYT trades at $54.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 43.00, whereas MMYT's P/E ratio is 36.66. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MMYT's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is more volatile compared to MMYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check MMYT's competition here
AHMA vs TNL Comparison July 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 51.1M. In comparison, TNL has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.72, while TNL trades at $73.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 43.00, whereas TNL's P/E ratio is 10.89. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TNL's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is less volatile compared to TNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check TNL's competition here
AHMA vs DESP Comparison July 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 51.1M. In comparison, DESP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.72, while DESP trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 43.00, whereas DESP's P/E ratio is -650.00. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DESP's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is more volatile compared to DESP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check DESP's competition here
AHMA vs LIND Comparison July 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 51.1M. In comparison, LIND has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.72, while LIND trades at $27.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 43.00, whereas LIND's P/E ratio is -131.76. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LIND's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is less volatile compared to LIND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check LIND's competition here
AHMA vs NUTR Comparison July 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 51.1M. In comparison, NUTR has a market cap of 628.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.72, while NUTR trades at $41.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 43.00, whereas NUTR's P/E ratio is 54.68. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NUTR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is more volatile compared to NUTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check NUTR's competition here
AHMA vs YTRA Comparison July 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 51.1M. In comparison, YTRA has a market cap of 51.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.72, while YTRA trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 43.00, whereas YTRA's P/E ratio is -21.52. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to YTRA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is less volatile compared to YTRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check YTRA's competition here
AHMA vs MRNOW Comparison July 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 51.1M. In comparison, MRNOW has a market cap of 39.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.72, while MRNOW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 43.00, whereas MRNOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MRNOW's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is less volatile compared to MRNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check MRNOW's competition here
AHMA vs TOUR Comparison July 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 51.1M. In comparison, TOUR has a market cap of 18.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.72, while TOUR trades at $5.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 43.00, whereas TOUR's P/E ratio is 31.77. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TOUR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is more volatile compared to TOUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check TOUR's competition here
AHMA vs MKGI Comparison July 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 51.1M. In comparison, MKGI has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.72, while MKGI trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 43.00, whereas MKGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MKGI's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is less volatile compared to MKGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check MKGI's competition here
AHMA vs JXG Comparison July 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 51.1M. In comparison, JXG has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.72, while JXG trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 43.00, whereas JXG's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JXG's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is less volatile compared to JXG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check JXG's competition here
AHMA vs MONDW Comparison July 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 51.1M. In comparison, MONDW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.72, while MONDW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 43.00, whereas MONDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MONDW's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is less volatile compared to MONDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check MONDW's competition here
AHMA vs SGLBW Comparison July 2026
AHMA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AHMA stands at 51.1M. In comparison, SGLBW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AHMA is priced at $1.72, while SGLBW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AHMA currently has a P/E ratio of 43.00, whereas SGLBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AHMA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SGLBW's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, AHMA is less volatile compared to SGLBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AHMA.Check SGLBW's competition here