Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc. (LIND) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LIND) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIND | $22.19 | +2.07% | 1.2B | -41.09 | -$0.54 | N/A |
| BKNG | $167.49 | +1.64% | 129.8B | 22.10 | $7.58 | +0.94% |
| ABNB | $133.72 | +0.10% | 79.4B | 33.02 | $4.05 | N/A |
| RCL | $293.28 | +2.40% | 78.7B | 17.90 | $16.39 | +1.70% |
| VIK | $89.99 | +1.52% | 40B | 33.45 | $2.69 | N/A |
| TCOM | $48.06 | +0.25% | 30.9B | 6.83 | $7.04 | N/A |
| EXPE | $227.18 | +0.79% | 26B | 20.07 | $11.32 | +0.78% |
| SABRP | $71.42 | -0.78% | 23.6B | -35.87 | -$1.99 | N/A |
| NCLH | $19.13 | +5.40% | 8.8B | 15.44 | $1.24 | N/A |
| TNL | $70.62 | +1.07% | 4.4B | 19.67 | $3.59 | +3.22% |
Stock Comparison
LIND vs BKNG Comparison June 2026
LIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIND stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BKNG has a market cap of 129.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LIND is priced at $22.19, while BKNG trades at $167.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIND currently has a P/E ratio of -41.09, whereas BKNG's P/E ratio is 22.10. In terms of profitability, LIND's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BKNG's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, LIND is more volatile compared to BKNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIND.Check BKNG's competition here
LIND vs ABNB Comparison June 2026
LIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIND stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ABNB has a market cap of 79.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LIND is priced at $22.19, while ABNB trades at $133.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIND currently has a P/E ratio of -41.09, whereas ABNB's P/E ratio is 33.02. In terms of profitability, LIND's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ABNB's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LIND is more volatile compared to ABNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIND.Check ABNB's competition here
LIND vs RCL Comparison June 2026
LIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIND stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RCL has a market cap of 78.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LIND is priced at $22.19, while RCL trades at $293.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIND currently has a P/E ratio of -41.09, whereas RCL's P/E ratio is 17.90. In terms of profitability, LIND's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RCL's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LIND is less volatile compared to RCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIND.Check RCL's competition here
LIND vs VIK Comparison June 2026
LIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIND stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VIK has a market cap of 40B. Regarding current trading prices, LIND is priced at $22.19, while VIK trades at $89.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIND currently has a P/E ratio of -41.09, whereas VIK's P/E ratio is 33.45. In terms of profitability, LIND's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VIK's ROE of +1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LIND is more volatile compared to VIK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIND.Check VIK's competition here
LIND vs TCOM Comparison June 2026
LIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIND stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TCOM has a market cap of 30.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LIND is priced at $22.19, while TCOM trades at $48.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIND currently has a P/E ratio of -41.09, whereas TCOM's P/E ratio is 6.83. In terms of profitability, LIND's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TCOM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LIND is more volatile compared to TCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIND.Check TCOM's competition here
LIND vs EXPE Comparison June 2026
LIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIND stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EXPE has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, LIND is priced at $22.19, while EXPE trades at $227.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIND currently has a P/E ratio of -41.09, whereas EXPE's P/E ratio is 20.07. In terms of profitability, LIND's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EXPE's ROE of +1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, LIND is less volatile compared to EXPE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIND.Check EXPE's competition here
LIND vs SABRP Comparison June 2026
LIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIND stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SABRP has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LIND is priced at $22.19, while SABRP trades at $71.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIND currently has a P/E ratio of -41.09, whereas SABRP's P/E ratio is -35.87. In terms of profitability, LIND's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SABRP's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LIND is more volatile compared to SABRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIND.Check SABRP's competition here
LIND vs NCLH Comparison June 2026
LIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIND stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NCLH has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LIND is priced at $22.19, while NCLH trades at $19.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIND currently has a P/E ratio of -41.09, whereas NCLH's P/E ratio is 15.44. In terms of profitability, LIND's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NCLH's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LIND is less volatile compared to NCLH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIND.Check NCLH's competition here
LIND vs TNL Comparison June 2026
LIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIND stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TNL has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LIND is priced at $22.19, while TNL trades at $70.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIND currently has a P/E ratio of -41.09, whereas TNL's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, LIND's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TNL's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LIND is more volatile compared to TNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIND.Check TNL's competition here
LIND vs MMYT Comparison June 2026
LIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIND stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MMYT has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LIND is priced at $22.19, while MMYT trades at $45.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIND currently has a P/E ratio of -41.09, whereas MMYT's P/E ratio is 125.47. In terms of profitability, LIND's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MMYT's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LIND is less volatile compared to MMYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIND.Check MMYT's competition here
LIND vs DESP Comparison June 2026
LIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIND stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DESP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LIND is priced at $22.19, while DESP trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIND currently has a P/E ratio of -41.09, whereas DESP's P/E ratio is -650.00. In terms of profitability, LIND's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DESP's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, LIND is more volatile compared to DESP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIND.Check DESP's competition here
LIND vs SABR Comparison June 2026
LIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIND stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SABR has a market cap of 731.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LIND is priced at $22.19, while SABR trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIND currently has a P/E ratio of -41.09, whereas SABR's P/E ratio is -2.98. In terms of profitability, LIND's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SABR's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LIND is less volatile compared to SABR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIND.Check SABR's competition here
LIND vs NUTR Comparison June 2026
LIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIND stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NUTR has a market cap of 628.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LIND is priced at $22.19, while NUTR trades at $41.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIND currently has a P/E ratio of -41.09, whereas NUTR's P/E ratio is -836.00. In terms of profitability, LIND's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NUTR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LIND is more volatile compared to NUTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIND.Check NUTR's competition here
LIND vs MRNOW Comparison June 2026
LIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIND stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MRNOW has a market cap of 69.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LIND is priced at $22.19, while MRNOW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIND currently has a P/E ratio of -41.09, whereas MRNOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIND's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MRNOW's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LIND is less volatile compared to MRNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIND.Check MRNOW's competition here
LIND vs YTRA Comparison June 2026
LIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIND stands at 1.2B. In comparison, YTRA has a market cap of 55.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LIND is priced at $22.19, while YTRA trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIND currently has a P/E ratio of -41.09, whereas YTRA's P/E ratio is -45.62. In terms of profitability, LIND's ROE is +0.12%, compared to YTRA's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LIND is less volatile compared to YTRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIND.Check YTRA's competition here
LIND vs AHMA Comparison June 2026
LIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIND stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AHMA has a market cap of 31.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LIND is priced at $22.19, while AHMA trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIND currently has a P/E ratio of -41.09, whereas AHMA's P/E ratio is 26.50. In terms of profitability, LIND's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AHMA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LIND is less volatile compared to AHMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIND.Check AHMA's competition here
LIND vs TOUR Comparison June 2026
LIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIND stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TOUR has a market cap of 20.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LIND is priced at $22.19, while TOUR trades at $5.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIND currently has a P/E ratio of -41.09, whereas TOUR's P/E ratio is 13.93. In terms of profitability, LIND's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TOUR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LIND is more volatile compared to TOUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIND.Check TOUR's competition here
LIND vs NTRP Comparison June 2026
LIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIND stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NTRP has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LIND is priced at $22.19, while NTRP trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIND currently has a P/E ratio of -41.09, whereas NTRP's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, LIND's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NTRP's ROE of -2.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LIND is less volatile compared to NTRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIND.Check NTRP's competition here
LIND vs MKGI Comparison June 2026
LIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIND stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MKGI has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LIND is priced at $22.19, while MKGI trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIND currently has a P/E ratio of -41.09, whereas MKGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIND's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MKGI's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LIND is less volatile compared to MKGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIND.Check MKGI's competition here
LIND vs JXG Comparison June 2026
LIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIND stands at 1.2B. In comparison, JXG has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LIND is priced at $22.19, while JXG trades at $8.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIND currently has a P/E ratio of -41.09, whereas JXG's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, LIND's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JXG's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, LIND is less volatile compared to JXG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIND.Check JXG's competition here
LIND vs MOND Comparison June 2026
LIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIND stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MOND has a market cap of 87.4K. Regarding current trading prices, LIND is priced at $22.19, while MOND trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIND currently has a P/E ratio of -41.09, whereas MOND's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LIND's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MOND's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LIND is more volatile compared to MOND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIND.Check MOND's competition here
LIND vs MONDW Comparison June 2026
LIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIND stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MONDW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIND is priced at $22.19, while MONDW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIND currently has a P/E ratio of -41.09, whereas MONDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIND's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MONDW's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LIND is less volatile compared to MONDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIND.Check MONDW's competition here
LIND vs SGLBW Comparison June 2026
LIND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LIND stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SGLBW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LIND is priced at $22.19, while SGLBW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LIND currently has a P/E ratio of -41.09, whereas SGLBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LIND's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SGLBW's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, LIND is less volatile compared to SGLBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LIND.Check SGLBW's competition here