Sabre Corporation (SABRP) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SABRP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SABRP | $71.42 | -0.78% | 23.6B | -35.87 | -$1.99 | N/A |
| BKNG | $167.21 | -1.21% | 129.6B | 22.06 | $7.58 | +0.94% |
| ABNB | $134.35 | -2.55% | 79.7B | 33.18 | $4.05 | N/A |
| RCL | $290.80 | +0.61% | 78B | 17.75 | $16.39 | +1.46% |
| VIK | $89.53 | -2.52% | 39.7B | 33.26 | $2.69 | N/A |
| TCOM | $48.47 | +0.37% | 31.2B | 6.88 | $7.04 | N/A |
| EXPE | $226.37 | -0.88% | 25.9B | 20.02 | $11.31 | +0.78% |
| NCLH | $18.13 | +0.39% | 8.3B | 14.63 | $1.24 | N/A |
| TNL | $71.57 | +4.06% | 4.5B | 19.93 | $3.59 | +3.18% |
| MMYT | $46.84 | -1.01% | 4.4B | 130.11 | $0.36 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SABRP vs BKNG Comparison June 2026
SABRP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SABRP stands at 23.6B. In comparison, BKNG has a market cap of 129.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SABRP is priced at $71.42, while BKNG trades at $167.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SABRP currently has a P/E ratio of -35.87, whereas BKNG's P/E ratio is 22.06. In terms of profitability, SABRP's ROE is -0.41%, compared to BKNG's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, SABRP is less volatile compared to BKNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SABRP.Check BKNG's competition here
SABRP vs ABNB Comparison June 2026
SABRP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SABRP stands at 23.6B. In comparison, ABNB has a market cap of 79.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SABRP is priced at $71.42, while ABNB trades at $134.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SABRP currently has a P/E ratio of -35.87, whereas ABNB's P/E ratio is 33.18. In terms of profitability, SABRP's ROE is -0.41%, compared to ABNB's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SABRP is less volatile compared to ABNB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SABRP.Check ABNB's competition here
SABRP vs RCL Comparison June 2026
SABRP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SABRP stands at 23.6B. In comparison, RCL has a market cap of 78B. Regarding current trading prices, SABRP is priced at $71.42, while RCL trades at $290.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SABRP currently has a P/E ratio of -35.87, whereas RCL's P/E ratio is 17.75. In terms of profitability, SABRP's ROE is -0.41%, compared to RCL's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SABRP is less volatile compared to RCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SABRP.Check RCL's competition here
SABRP vs VIK Comparison June 2026
SABRP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SABRP stands at 23.6B. In comparison, VIK has a market cap of 39.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SABRP is priced at $71.42, while VIK trades at $89.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SABRP currently has a P/E ratio of -35.87, whereas VIK's P/E ratio is 33.26. In terms of profitability, SABRP's ROE is -0.41%, compared to VIK's ROE of +1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, SABRP is less volatile compared to VIK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SABRP.Check VIK's competition here
SABRP vs TCOM Comparison June 2026
SABRP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SABRP stands at 23.6B. In comparison, TCOM has a market cap of 31.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SABRP is priced at $71.42, while TCOM trades at $48.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SABRP currently has a P/E ratio of -35.87, whereas TCOM's P/E ratio is 6.88. In terms of profitability, SABRP's ROE is -0.41%, compared to TCOM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SABRP is more volatile compared to TCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SABRP.Check TCOM's competition here
SABRP vs EXPE Comparison June 2026
SABRP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SABRP stands at 23.6B. In comparison, EXPE has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SABRP is priced at $71.42, while EXPE trades at $226.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SABRP currently has a P/E ratio of -35.87, whereas EXPE's P/E ratio is 20.02. In terms of profitability, SABRP's ROE is -0.41%, compared to EXPE's ROE of +1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SABRP is less volatile compared to EXPE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SABRP.Check EXPE's competition here
SABRP vs NCLH Comparison June 2026
SABRP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SABRP stands at 23.6B. In comparison, NCLH has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SABRP is priced at $71.42, while NCLH trades at $18.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SABRP currently has a P/E ratio of -35.87, whereas NCLH's P/E ratio is 14.63. In terms of profitability, SABRP's ROE is -0.41%, compared to NCLH's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SABRP is less volatile compared to NCLH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SABRP.Check NCLH's competition here
SABRP vs TNL Comparison June 2026
SABRP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SABRP stands at 23.6B. In comparison, TNL has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SABRP is priced at $71.42, while TNL trades at $71.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SABRP currently has a P/E ratio of -35.87, whereas TNL's P/E ratio is 19.93. In terms of profitability, SABRP's ROE is -0.41%, compared to TNL's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SABRP is less volatile compared to TNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SABRP.Check TNL's competition here
SABRP vs MMYT Comparison June 2026
SABRP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SABRP stands at 23.6B. In comparison, MMYT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SABRP is priced at $71.42, while MMYT trades at $46.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SABRP currently has a P/E ratio of -35.87, whereas MMYT's P/E ratio is 130.11. In terms of profitability, SABRP's ROE is -0.41%, compared to MMYT's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SABRP is less volatile compared to MMYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SABRP.Check MMYT's competition here
SABRP vs DESP Comparison June 2026
SABRP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SABRP stands at 23.6B. In comparison, DESP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SABRP is priced at $71.42, while DESP trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SABRP currently has a P/E ratio of -35.87, whereas DESP's P/E ratio is -650.00. In terms of profitability, SABRP's ROE is -0.41%, compared to DESP's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, SABRP is more volatile compared to DESP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SABRP.Check DESP's competition here
SABRP vs LIND Comparison June 2026
SABRP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SABRP stands at 23.6B. In comparison, LIND has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SABRP is priced at $71.42, while LIND trades at $22.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SABRP currently has a P/E ratio of -35.87, whereas LIND's P/E ratio is -42.04. In terms of profitability, SABRP's ROE is -0.41%, compared to LIND's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SABRP is less volatile compared to LIND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SABRP.Check LIND's competition here
SABRP vs SABR Comparison June 2026
SABRP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SABRP stands at 23.6B. In comparison, SABR has a market cap of 743.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SABRP is priced at $71.42, while SABR trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SABRP currently has a P/E ratio of -35.87, whereas SABR's P/E ratio is -3.03. In terms of profitability, SABRP's ROE is -0.41%, compared to SABR's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SABRP is less volatile compared to SABR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SABRP.Check SABR's competition here
SABRP vs NUTR Comparison June 2026
SABRP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SABRP stands at 23.6B. In comparison, NUTR has a market cap of 628.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SABRP is priced at $71.42, while NUTR trades at $41.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SABRP currently has a P/E ratio of -35.87, whereas NUTR's P/E ratio is -836.00. In terms of profitability, SABRP's ROE is -0.41%, compared to NUTR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SABRP is more volatile compared to NUTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SABRP.Check NUTR's competition here
SABRP vs MRNOW Comparison June 2026
SABRP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SABRP stands at 23.6B. In comparison, MRNOW has a market cap of 76.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SABRP is priced at $71.42, while MRNOW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SABRP currently has a P/E ratio of -35.87, whereas MRNOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SABRP's ROE is -0.41%, compared to MRNOW's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SABRP is less volatile compared to MRNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SABRP.Check MRNOW's competition here
SABRP vs YTRA Comparison June 2026
SABRP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SABRP stands at 23.6B. In comparison, YTRA has a market cap of 54.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SABRP is priced at $71.42, while YTRA trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SABRP currently has a P/E ratio of -35.87, whereas YTRA's P/E ratio is -45.00. In terms of profitability, SABRP's ROE is -0.41%, compared to YTRA's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SABRP is less volatile compared to YTRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SABRP.Check YTRA's competition here
SABRP vs AHMA Comparison June 2026
SABRP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SABRP stands at 23.6B. In comparison, AHMA has a market cap of 35.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SABRP is priced at $71.42, while AHMA trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SABRP currently has a P/E ratio of -35.87, whereas AHMA's P/E ratio is 30.00. In terms of profitability, SABRP's ROE is -0.41%, compared to AHMA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SABRP is less volatile compared to AHMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SABRP.Check AHMA's competition here
SABRP vs TOUR Comparison June 2026
SABRP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SABRP stands at 23.6B. In comparison, TOUR has a market cap of 20.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SABRP is priced at $71.42, while TOUR trades at $5.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SABRP currently has a P/E ratio of -35.87, whereas TOUR's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, SABRP's ROE is -0.41%, compared to TOUR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SABRP is less volatile compared to TOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SABRP.Check TOUR's competition here
SABRP vs NTRP Comparison June 2026
SABRP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SABRP stands at 23.6B. In comparison, NTRP has a market cap of 17.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SABRP is priced at $71.42, while NTRP trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SABRP currently has a P/E ratio of -35.87, whereas NTRP's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, SABRP's ROE is -0.41%, compared to NTRP's ROE of -2.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SABRP is less volatile compared to NTRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SABRP.Check NTRP's competition here
SABRP vs MKGI Comparison June 2026
SABRP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SABRP stands at 23.6B. In comparison, MKGI has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SABRP is priced at $71.42, while MKGI trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SABRP currently has a P/E ratio of -35.87, whereas MKGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SABRP's ROE is -0.41%, compared to MKGI's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SABRP is less volatile compared to MKGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SABRP.Check MKGI's competition here
SABRP vs JXG Comparison June 2026
SABRP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SABRP stands at 23.6B. In comparison, JXG has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SABRP is priced at $71.42, while JXG trades at $8.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SABRP currently has a P/E ratio of -35.87, whereas JXG's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, SABRP's ROE is -0.41%, compared to JXG's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SABRP is less volatile compared to JXG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SABRP.Check JXG's competition here
SABRP vs MOND Comparison June 2026
SABRP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SABRP stands at 23.6B. In comparison, MOND has a market cap of 87.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SABRP is priced at $71.42, while MOND trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SABRP currently has a P/E ratio of -35.87, whereas MOND's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SABRP's ROE is -0.41%, compared to MOND's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SABRP is more volatile compared to MOND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SABRP.Check MOND's competition here
SABRP vs MONDW Comparison June 2026
SABRP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SABRP stands at 23.6B. In comparison, MONDW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SABRP is priced at $71.42, while MONDW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SABRP currently has a P/E ratio of -35.87, whereas MONDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SABRP's ROE is -0.41%, compared to MONDW's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SABRP is less volatile compared to MONDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SABRP.Check MONDW's competition here
SABRP vs SGLBW Comparison June 2026
SABRP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SABRP stands at 23.6B. In comparison, SGLBW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SABRP is priced at $71.42, while SGLBW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SABRP currently has a P/E ratio of -35.87, whereas SGLBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SABRP's ROE is -0.41%, compared to SGLBW's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, SABRP is less volatile compared to SGLBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SABRP.Check SGLBW's competition here