Expedia Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: EXPE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Expedia Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: EXPE) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EXPE stands at 32B. In comparison, BKNG has a market cap of 130.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EXPE is priced at $279.35 on the NASDAQ, while BKNG trades at $167.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EXPE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas BKNG's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, EXPE's ROE is +1.85%, compared to BKNG's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, EXPE is more volatile compared to BKNG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EXPE.Check BKNG's competition here

Expedia Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: EXPE) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EXPE stands at 32B. In comparison, ABNB has a market cap of 98.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EXPE is priced at $279.35 on the NASDAQ, while ABNB trades at $166.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EXPE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas ABNB's P/E ratio is 37.78. In terms of profitability, EXPE's ROE is +1.85%, compared to ABNB's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EXPE is more volatile compared to ABNB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EXPE.Check ABNB's competition here

Expedia Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: EXPE) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EXPE stands at 32B. In comparison, RCL has a market cap of 65.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EXPE is priced at $279.35 on the NASDAQ, while RCL trades at $245.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EXPE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas RCL's P/E ratio is 14.87. In terms of profitability, EXPE's ROE is +1.85%, compared to RCL's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, EXPE is more volatile compared to RCL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EXPE.Check RCL's competition here

Expedia Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: EXPE) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EXPE stands at 32B. In comparison, VIK has a market cap of 37.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EXPE is priced at $279.35 on the NASDAQ, while VIK trades at $84.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EXPE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas VIK's P/E ratio is 27.41. In terms of profitability, EXPE's ROE is +1.85%, compared to VIK's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EXPE is more volatile compared to VIK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EXPE.Check VIK's competition here

Expedia Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: EXPE) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EXPE stands at 32B. In comparison, CCL has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EXPE is priced at $279.35 on the NASDAQ, while CCL trades at $21.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EXPE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas CCL's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, EXPE's ROE is +1.85%, compared to CCL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, EXPE is more volatile compared to CCL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EXPE.Check CCL's competition here

Expedia Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: EXPE) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EXPE stands at 32B. In comparison, TCOM has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EXPE is priced at $279.35 on the NASDAQ, while TCOM trades at $40.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EXPE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas TCOM's P/E ratio is 6.34. In terms of profitability, EXPE's ROE is +1.85%, compared to TCOM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EXPE is more volatile compared to TCOM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EXPE.Check TCOM's competition here

Expedia Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: EXPE) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EXPE stands at 32B. In comparison, SABRP has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EXPE is priced at $279.35 on the NASDAQ, while SABRP trades at $71.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EXPE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas SABRP's P/E ratio is -35.87. In terms of profitability, EXPE's ROE is +1.85%, compared to SABRP's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, EXPE is more volatile compared to SABRP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EXPE.Check SABRP's competition here

Expedia Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: EXPE) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EXPE stands at 32B. In comparison, NCLH has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EXPE is priced at $279.35 on the NASDAQ, while NCLH trades at $14.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EXPE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas NCLH's P/E ratio is 6.36. In terms of profitability, EXPE's ROE is +1.85%, compared to NCLH's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, EXPE is more volatile compared to NCLH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EXPE.Check NCLH's competition here

Expedia Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: EXPE) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EXPE stands at 32B. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, EXPE is priced at $279.35 on the NASDAQ, while GBTG trades at $9.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EXPE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is 135.43. In terms of profitability, EXPE's ROE is +1.85%, compared to GBTG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EXPE is more volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EXPE.Check GBTG's competition here

Expedia Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: EXPE) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EXPE stands at 32B. In comparison, MMYT has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EXPE is priced at $279.35 on the NASDAQ, while MMYT trades at $47.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EXPE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas MMYT's P/E ratio is 133.41. In terms of profitability, EXPE's ROE is +1.85%, compared to MMYT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EXPE is more volatile compared to MMYT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EXPE.Check MMYT's competition here

Expedia Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: EXPE) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EXPE stands at 32B. In comparison, TNL has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EXPE is priced at $279.35 on the NASDAQ, while TNL trades at $63.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EXPE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas TNL's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, EXPE's ROE is +1.85%, compared to TNL's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EXPE is more volatile compared to TNL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EXPE.Check TNL's competition here

Expedia Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: EXPE) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EXPE stands at 32B. In comparison, LIND has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EXPE is priced at $279.35 on the NASDAQ, while LIND trades at $27.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EXPE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas LIND's P/E ratio is -550.80. In terms of profitability, EXPE's ROE is +1.85%, compared to LIND's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EXPE is less volatile compared to LIND. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EXPE.Check LIND's competition here

Expedia Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: EXPE) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EXPE stands at 32B. In comparison, DESP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EXPE is priced at $279.35 on the NASDAQ, while DESP trades at $19.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EXPE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas DESP's P/E ratio is -650.00. In terms of profitability, EXPE's ROE is +1.85%, compared to DESP's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, EXPE is more volatile compared to DESP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EXPE.Check DESP's competition here

Expedia Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: EXPE) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EXPE stands at 32B. In comparison, PRSU has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EXPE is priced at $279.35 on the NASDAQ, while PRSU trades at $48.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EXPE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas PRSU's P/E ratio is 37.07. In terms of profitability, EXPE's ROE is +1.85%, compared to PRSU's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EXPE is less volatile compared to PRSU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EXPE.Check PRSU's competition here

Expedia Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: EXPE) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EXPE stands at 32B. In comparison, TRIP has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, EXPE is priced at $279.35 on the NASDAQ, while TRIP trades at $8.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EXPE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas TRIP's P/E ratio is 9.51. In terms of profitability, EXPE's ROE is +1.85%, compared to TRIP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EXPE is less volatile compared to TRIP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EXPE.Check TRIP's competition here

Expedia Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: EXPE) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EXPE stands at 32B. In comparison, NUTR has a market cap of 628.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EXPE is priced at $279.35 on the NASDAQ, while NUTR trades at $41.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EXPE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas NUTR's P/E ratio is 54.68. In terms of profitability, EXPE's ROE is +1.85%, compared to NUTR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EXPE is more volatile compared to NUTR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EXPE.Check NUTR's competition here

Expedia Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: EXPE) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EXPE stands at 32B. In comparison, YTRA has a market cap of 65.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EXPE is priced at $279.35 on the NASDAQ, while YTRA trades at $1.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EXPE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas YTRA's P/E ratio is -23.69. In terms of profitability, EXPE's ROE is +1.85%, compared to YTRA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EXPE is less volatile compared to YTRA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EXPE.Check YTRA's competition here

Expedia Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: EXPE) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EXPE stands at 32B. In comparison, AHMA has a market cap of 39.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EXPE is priced at $279.35 on the NASDAQ, while AHMA trades at $1.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EXPE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas AHMA's P/E ratio is 33.00. In terms of profitability, EXPE's ROE is +1.85%, compared to AHMA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EXPE is less volatile compared to AHMA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EXPE.Check AHMA's competition here

Expedia Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: EXPE) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EXPE stands at 32B. In comparison, TOUR has a market cap of 18.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EXPE is priced at $279.35 on the NASDAQ, while TOUR trades at $5.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EXPE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas TOUR's P/E ratio is 11.84. In terms of profitability, EXPE's ROE is +1.85%, compared to TOUR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EXPE is more volatile compared to TOUR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EXPE.Check TOUR's competition here

Expedia Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: EXPE) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EXPE stands at 32B. In comparison, MKGI has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EXPE is priced at $279.35 on the NASDAQ, while MKGI trades at $2.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EXPE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas MKGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EXPE's ROE is +1.85%, compared to MKGI's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, EXPE is less volatile compared to MKGI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EXPE.Check MKGI's competition here

Expedia Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: EXPE) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EXPE stands at 32B. In comparison, NTRP has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EXPE is priced at $279.35 on the NASDAQ, while NTRP trades at $1.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EXPE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas NTRP's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, EXPE's ROE is +1.85%, compared to NTRP's ROE of -2.55%. Regarding short-term risk, EXPE is less volatile compared to NTRP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EXPE.Check NTRP's competition here

Expedia Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: EXPE) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EXPE stands at 32B. In comparison, JXG has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EXPE is priced at $279.35 on the NASDAQ, while JXG trades at $6.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EXPE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas JXG's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, EXPE's ROE is +1.85%, compared to JXG's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, EXPE is less volatile compared to JXG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EXPE.Check JXG's competition here

Expedia Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: EXPE) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EXPE stands at 32B. In comparison, MONDW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EXPE is priced at $279.35 on the NASDAQ, while MONDW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EXPE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas MONDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EXPE's ROE is +1.85%, compared to MONDW's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, EXPE is less volatile compared to MONDW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EXPE.Check MONDW's competition here

Expedia Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: EXPE) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EXPE stands at 32B. In comparison, SGLBW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EXPE is priced at $279.35 on the NASDAQ, while SGLBW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EXPE currently has a P/E ratio of 14.65, whereas SGLBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EXPE's ROE is +1.85%, compared to SGLBW's ROE of -2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, EXPE is less volatile compared to SGLBW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EXPE.Check SGLBW's competition here