Booking Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: BKNG) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Booking Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: BKNG) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BKNG stands at 130.1B. In comparison, ABNB has a market cap of 98.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BKNG is priced at $167.90 on the NASDAQ, while ABNB trades at $166.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BKNG currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas ABNB's P/E ratio is 37.78. In terms of profitability, BKNG's ROE is -0.97%, compared to ABNB's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BKNG is more volatile compared to ABNB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKNG.Check ABNB's competition here

Booking Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: BKNG) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BKNG stands at 130.1B. In comparison, RCL has a market cap of 65.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BKNG is priced at $167.90 on the NASDAQ, while RCL trades at $245.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BKNG currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas RCL's P/E ratio is 14.87. In terms of profitability, BKNG's ROE is -0.97%, compared to RCL's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, BKNG is less volatile compared to RCL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKNG.Check RCL's competition here

Booking Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: BKNG) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BKNG stands at 130.1B. In comparison, VIK has a market cap of 37.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BKNG is priced at $167.90 on the NASDAQ, while VIK trades at $84.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BKNG currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas VIK's P/E ratio is 27.41. In terms of profitability, BKNG's ROE is -0.97%, compared to VIK's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BKNG is less volatile compared to VIK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKNG.Check VIK's competition here

Booking Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: BKNG) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BKNG stands at 130.1B. In comparison, EXPE has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, BKNG is priced at $167.90 on the NASDAQ, while EXPE trades at $279.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BKNG currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas EXPE's P/E ratio is 14.65. In terms of profitability, BKNG's ROE is -0.97%, compared to EXPE's ROE of +1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, BKNG is less volatile compared to EXPE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKNG.Check EXPE's competition here

Booking Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: BKNG) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BKNG stands at 130.1B. In comparison, CCL has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BKNG is priced at $167.90 on the NASDAQ, while CCL trades at $21.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BKNG currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas CCL's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, BKNG's ROE is -0.97%, compared to CCL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BKNG is less volatile compared to CCL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKNG.Check CCL's competition here

Booking Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: BKNG) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BKNG stands at 130.1B. In comparison, TCOM has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BKNG is priced at $167.90 on the NASDAQ, while TCOM trades at $40.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BKNG currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas TCOM's P/E ratio is 6.34. In terms of profitability, BKNG's ROE is -0.97%, compared to TCOM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BKNG is more volatile compared to TCOM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKNG.Check TCOM's competition here

Booking Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: BKNG) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BKNG stands at 130.1B. In comparison, SABRP has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BKNG is priced at $167.90 on the NASDAQ, while SABRP trades at $71.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BKNG currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas SABRP's P/E ratio is -35.87. In terms of profitability, BKNG's ROE is -0.97%, compared to SABRP's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, BKNG is less volatile compared to SABRP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKNG.Check SABRP's competition here

Booking Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: BKNG) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BKNG stands at 130.1B. In comparison, NCLH has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BKNG is priced at $167.90 on the NASDAQ, while NCLH trades at $14.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BKNG currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas NCLH's P/E ratio is 6.36. In terms of profitability, BKNG's ROE is -0.97%, compared to NCLH's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BKNG is less volatile compared to NCLH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKNG.Check NCLH's competition here

Booking Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: BKNG) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BKNG stands at 130.1B. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, BKNG is priced at $167.90 on the NASDAQ, while GBTG trades at $9.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BKNG currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is 135.43. In terms of profitability, BKNG's ROE is -0.97%, compared to GBTG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BKNG is more volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKNG.Check GBTG's competition here

Booking Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: BKNG) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BKNG stands at 130.1B. In comparison, MMYT has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BKNG is priced at $167.90 on the NASDAQ, while MMYT trades at $47.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BKNG currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas MMYT's P/E ratio is 133.41. In terms of profitability, BKNG's ROE is -0.97%, compared to MMYT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BKNG is less volatile compared to MMYT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKNG.Check MMYT's competition here

Booking Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: BKNG) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BKNG stands at 130.1B. In comparison, TNL has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BKNG is priced at $167.90 on the NASDAQ, while TNL trades at $63.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BKNG currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas TNL's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, BKNG's ROE is -0.97%, compared to TNL's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BKNG is more volatile compared to TNL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKNG.Check TNL's competition here

Booking Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: BKNG) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BKNG stands at 130.1B. In comparison, LIND has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BKNG is priced at $167.90 on the NASDAQ, while LIND trades at $27.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BKNG currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas LIND's P/E ratio is -550.80. In terms of profitability, BKNG's ROE is -0.97%, compared to LIND's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BKNG is less volatile compared to LIND. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKNG.Check LIND's competition here

Booking Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: BKNG) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BKNG stands at 130.1B. In comparison, DESP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BKNG is priced at $167.90 on the NASDAQ, while DESP trades at $19.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BKNG currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas DESP's P/E ratio is -650.00. In terms of profitability, BKNG's ROE is -0.97%, compared to DESP's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, BKNG is more volatile compared to DESP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKNG.Check DESP's competition here

Booking Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: BKNG) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BKNG stands at 130.1B. In comparison, PRSU has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BKNG is priced at $167.90 on the NASDAQ, while PRSU trades at $48.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BKNG currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas PRSU's P/E ratio is 37.07. In terms of profitability, BKNG's ROE is -0.97%, compared to PRSU's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BKNG is less volatile compared to PRSU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKNG.Check PRSU's competition here

Booking Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: BKNG) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BKNG stands at 130.1B. In comparison, TRIP has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, BKNG is priced at $167.90 on the NASDAQ, while TRIP trades at $8.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BKNG currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas TRIP's P/E ratio is 9.51. In terms of profitability, BKNG's ROE is -0.97%, compared to TRIP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BKNG is less volatile compared to TRIP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKNG.Check TRIP's competition here

Booking Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: BKNG) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BKNG stands at 130.1B. In comparison, NUTR has a market cap of 628.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BKNG is priced at $167.90 on the NASDAQ, while NUTR trades at $41.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BKNG currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas NUTR's P/E ratio is 54.68. In terms of profitability, BKNG's ROE is -0.97%, compared to NUTR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BKNG is more volatile compared to NUTR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKNG.Check NUTR's competition here

Booking Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: BKNG) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BKNG stands at 130.1B. In comparison, YTRA has a market cap of 65.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BKNG is priced at $167.90 on the NASDAQ, while YTRA trades at $1.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BKNG currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas YTRA's P/E ratio is -23.69. In terms of profitability, BKNG's ROE is -0.97%, compared to YTRA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BKNG is less volatile compared to YTRA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKNG.Check YTRA's competition here

Booking Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: BKNG) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BKNG stands at 130.1B. In comparison, AHMA has a market cap of 39.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BKNG is priced at $167.90 on the NASDAQ, while AHMA trades at $1.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BKNG currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas AHMA's P/E ratio is 33.00. In terms of profitability, BKNG's ROE is -0.97%, compared to AHMA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BKNG is less volatile compared to AHMA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKNG.Check AHMA's competition here

Booking Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: BKNG) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BKNG stands at 130.1B. In comparison, TOUR has a market cap of 18.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BKNG is priced at $167.90 on the NASDAQ, while TOUR trades at $5.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BKNG currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas TOUR's P/E ratio is 11.84. In terms of profitability, BKNG's ROE is -0.97%, compared to TOUR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BKNG is more volatile compared to TOUR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKNG.Check TOUR's competition here

Booking Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: BKNG) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BKNG stands at 130.1B. In comparison, MKGI has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BKNG is priced at $167.90 on the NASDAQ, while MKGI trades at $2.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BKNG currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas MKGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BKNG's ROE is -0.97%, compared to MKGI's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BKNG is less volatile compared to MKGI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKNG.Check MKGI's competition here

Booking Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: BKNG) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BKNG stands at 130.1B. In comparison, NTRP has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BKNG is priced at $167.90 on the NASDAQ, while NTRP trades at $1.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BKNG currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas NTRP's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, BKNG's ROE is -0.97%, compared to NTRP's ROE of -2.55%. Regarding short-term risk, BKNG is less volatile compared to NTRP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKNG.Check NTRP's competition here

Booking Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: BKNG) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BKNG stands at 130.1B. In comparison, JXG has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BKNG is priced at $167.90 on the NASDAQ, while JXG trades at $6.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BKNG currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas JXG's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, BKNG's ROE is -0.97%, compared to JXG's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, BKNG is less volatile compared to JXG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKNG.Check JXG's competition here

Booking Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: BKNG) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BKNG stands at 130.1B. In comparison, MONDW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BKNG is priced at $167.90 on the NASDAQ, while MONDW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BKNG currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas MONDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BKNG's ROE is -0.97%, compared to MONDW's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BKNG is less volatile compared to MONDW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKNG.Check MONDW's competition here

Booking Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: BKNG) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BKNG stands at 130.1B. In comparison, SGLBW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BKNG is priced at $167.90 on the NASDAQ, while SGLBW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BKNG currently has a P/E ratio of 17.47, whereas SGLBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BKNG's ROE is -0.97%, compared to SGLBW's ROE of -2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, BKNG is less volatile compared to SGLBW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BKNG.Check SGLBW's competition here