Travel + Leisure Co.
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for TNL
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for TNL
Travel + Leisure Co. (TNL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TNL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TNL | $78.33 | +2.82% | 4.9B | 22.78 | $3.44 | +2.92% |
| BKNG | $192.01 | +4.04% | 152B | 28.96 | $6.63 | +0.82% |
| ABNB | $141.55 | +2.71% | 84.9B | 35.21 | $4.02 | N/A |
| RCL | $285.48 | +7.34% | 77.8B | 18.28 | $15.62 | +1.48% |
| VIK | $85.80 | +6.84% | 38.1B | 33.65 | $2.55 | N/A |
| TCOM | $55.19 | +0.91% | 36.1B | 7.91 | $6.98 | N/A |
| EXPE | $265.84 | +4.48% | 31.1B | 27.07 | $9.82 | +0.63% |
| SABRP | $71.42 | -0.78% | 23.6B | -35.87 | -$1.99 | N/A |
| NCLH | $20.99 | +4.82% | 9.6B | 22.57 | $0.93 | N/A |
| MMYT | $51.02 | +6.62% | 4.9B | 98.12 | $0.52 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TNL vs BKNG Comparison April 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.9B. In comparison, BKNG has a market cap of 152B. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $78.33, while BKNG trades at $192.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas BKNG's P/E ratio is 28.96. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to BKNG's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to BKNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check BKNG's competition here
TNL vs ABNB Comparison April 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.9B. In comparison, ABNB has a market cap of 84.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $78.33, while ABNB trades at $141.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas ABNB's P/E ratio is 35.21. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to ABNB's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to ABNB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check ABNB's competition here
TNL vs RCL Comparison April 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.9B. In comparison, RCL has a market cap of 77.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $78.33, while RCL trades at $285.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas RCL's P/E ratio is 18.28. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to RCL's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to RCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check RCL's competition here
TNL vs VIK Comparison April 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.9B. In comparison, VIK has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $78.33, while VIK trades at $85.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas VIK's P/E ratio is 33.65. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to VIK's ROE of +2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to VIK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check VIK's competition here
TNL vs TCOM Comparison April 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.9B. In comparison, TCOM has a market cap of 36.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $78.33, while TCOM trades at $55.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas TCOM's P/E ratio is 7.91. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to TCOM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is more volatile compared to TCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check TCOM's competition here
TNL vs EXPE Comparison April 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.9B. In comparison, EXPE has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $78.33, while EXPE trades at $265.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas EXPE's P/E ratio is 27.07. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to EXPE's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to EXPE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check EXPE's competition here
TNL vs SABRP Comparison April 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.9B. In comparison, SABRP has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $78.33, while SABRP trades at $71.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas SABRP's P/E ratio is -35.87. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SABRP's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to SABRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check SABRP's competition here
TNL vs NCLH Comparison April 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.9B. In comparison, NCLH has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $78.33, while NCLH trades at $20.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas NCLH's P/E ratio is 22.57. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to NCLH's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to NCLH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check NCLH's competition here
TNL vs MMYT Comparison April 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.9B. In comparison, MMYT has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $78.33, while MMYT trades at $51.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas MMYT's P/E ratio is 98.12. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to MMYT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to MMYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check MMYT's competition here
TNL vs DESP Comparison April 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.9B. In comparison, DESP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $78.33, while DESP trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas DESP's P/E ratio is -650.00. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to DESP's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is more volatile compared to DESP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check DESP's competition here
TNL vs TRIP Comparison April 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.9B. In comparison, TRIP has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $78.33, while TRIP trades at $11.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas TRIP's P/E ratio is 36.74. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to TRIP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to TRIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check TRIP's competition here
TNL vs LIND Comparison April 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.9B. In comparison, LIND has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $78.33, while LIND trades at $20.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas LIND's P/E ratio is -33.27. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to LIND's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to LIND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check LIND's competition here
TNL vs SABR Comparison April 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.9B. In comparison, SABR has a market cap of 746.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $78.33, while SABR trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas SABR's P/E ratio is -2.91. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SABR's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to SABR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check SABR's competition here
TNL vs NUTR Comparison April 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.9B. In comparison, NUTR has a market cap of 628.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $78.33, while NUTR trades at $41.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas NUTR's P/E ratio is -836.00. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to NUTR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is more volatile compared to NUTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check NUTR's competition here
TNL vs MRNOW Comparison April 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.9B. In comparison, MRNOW has a market cap of 91.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $78.33, while MRNOW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas MRNOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to MRNOW's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is more volatile compared to MRNOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check MRNOW's competition here
TNL vs YTRA Comparison April 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.9B. In comparison, YTRA has a market cap of 69.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $78.33, while YTRA trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas YTRA's P/E ratio is -57.50. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to YTRA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to YTRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check YTRA's competition here
TNL vs AHMA Comparison April 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.9B. In comparison, AHMA has a market cap of 37.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $78.33, while AHMA trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas AHMA's P/E ratio is 31.75. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to AHMA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to AHMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check AHMA's competition here
TNL vs TOUR Comparison April 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.9B. In comparison, TOUR has a market cap of 28.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $78.33, while TOUR trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas TOUR's P/E ratio is 18.05. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to TOUR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to TOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check TOUR's competition here
TNL vs NTRP Comparison April 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.9B. In comparison, NTRP has a market cap of 21.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $78.33, while NTRP trades at $2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas NTRP's P/E ratio is -1.31. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to NTRP's ROE of -2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to NTRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check NTRP's competition here
TNL vs MKGI Comparison April 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.9B. In comparison, MKGI has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $78.33, while MKGI trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas MKGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to MKGI's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to MKGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check MKGI's competition here
TNL vs JXG Comparison April 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.9B. In comparison, JXG has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $78.33, while JXG trades at $4.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas JXG's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to JXG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is more volatile compared to JXG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check JXG's competition here
TNL vs MOND Comparison April 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.9B. In comparison, MOND has a market cap of 87.4K. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $78.33, while MOND trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas MOND's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to MOND's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is more volatile compared to MOND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check MOND's competition here
TNL vs SGLBW Comparison April 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.9B. In comparison, SGLBW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $78.33, while SGLBW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas SGLBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SGLBW's ROE of -2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to SGLBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check SGLBW's competition here
TNL vs MONDW Comparison April 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.9B. In comparison, MONDW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $78.33, while MONDW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.78, whereas MONDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to MONDW's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to MONDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check MONDW's competition here