Travel + Leisure Co. (TNL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TNL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TNL | $73.53 | +0.35% | 4.5B | 10.78 | $6.73 | +3.20% |
| BKNG | $177.24 | -2.44% | 139.1B | 19.32 | $9.29 | +0.90% |
| ABNB | $143.75 | -1.53% | 86B | 35.70 | $4.06 | N/A |
| RCL | $288.13 | +0.41% | 76.8B | 17.32 | $16.53 | +1.75% |
| VIK | $98.81 | +1.82% | 43.1B | 35.25 | $2.75 | N/A |
| CCL | $26.29 | -0.45% | 35.7B | 10.95 | $2.38 | +1.15% |
| EXPE | $263.55 | -1.94% | 30.4B | 15.10 | $17.55 | +0.66% |
| TCOM | $43.62 | +2.77% | 27.8B | 6.88 | $6.42 | N/A |
| SABRP | $71.42 | -0.78% | 23.6B | -35.87 | -$1.99 | N/A |
| NCLH | $19.57 | +0.57% | 9B | 8.78 | $2.22 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TNL vs BKNG Comparison July 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.5B. In comparison, BKNG has a market cap of 139.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $73.53, while BKNG trades at $177.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.78, whereas BKNG's P/E ratio is 19.32. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to BKNG's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to BKNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check BKNG's competition here
TNL vs ABNB Comparison July 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.5B. In comparison, ABNB has a market cap of 86B. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $73.53, while ABNB trades at $143.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.78, whereas ABNB's P/E ratio is 35.70. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to ABNB's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is more volatile compared to ABNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check ABNB's competition here
TNL vs RCL Comparison July 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.5B. In comparison, RCL has a market cap of 76.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $73.53, while RCL trades at $288.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.78, whereas RCL's P/E ratio is 17.32. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to RCL's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is more volatile compared to RCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check RCL's competition here
TNL vs VIK Comparison July 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.5B. In comparison, VIK has a market cap of 43.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $73.53, while VIK trades at $98.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.78, whereas VIK's P/E ratio is 35.25. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to VIK's ROE of +1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to VIK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check VIK's competition here
TNL vs CCL Comparison July 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.5B. In comparison, CCL has a market cap of 35.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $73.53, while CCL trades at $26.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.78, whereas CCL's P/E ratio is 10.95. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to CCL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to CCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check CCL's competition here
TNL vs EXPE Comparison July 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.5B. In comparison, EXPE has a market cap of 30.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $73.53, while EXPE trades at $263.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.78, whereas EXPE's P/E ratio is 15.10. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to EXPE's ROE of +1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to EXPE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check EXPE's competition here
TNL vs TCOM Comparison July 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.5B. In comparison, TCOM has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $73.53, while TCOM trades at $43.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.78, whereas TCOM's P/E ratio is 6.88. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to TCOM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is more volatile compared to TCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check TCOM's competition here
TNL vs SABRP Comparison July 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.5B. In comparison, SABRP has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $73.53, while SABRP trades at $71.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.78, whereas SABRP's P/E ratio is -35.87. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SABRP's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to SABRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check SABRP's competition here
TNL vs NCLH Comparison July 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.5B. In comparison, NCLH has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $73.53, while NCLH trades at $19.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.78, whereas NCLH's P/E ratio is 8.78. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to NCLH's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to NCLH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check NCLH's competition here
TNL vs MMYT Comparison July 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.5B. In comparison, MMYT has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $73.53, while MMYT trades at $55.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.78, whereas MMYT's P/E ratio is 35.72. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to MMYT's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to MMYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check MMYT's competition here
TNL vs DESP Comparison July 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.5B. In comparison, DESP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $73.53, while DESP trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.78, whereas DESP's P/E ratio is -650.00. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to DESP's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is more volatile compared to DESP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check DESP's competition here
TNL vs LIND Comparison July 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.5B. In comparison, LIND has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $73.53, while LIND trades at $28.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.78, whereas LIND's P/E ratio is -131.43. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to LIND's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to LIND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check LIND's competition here
TNL vs NUTR Comparison July 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.5B. In comparison, NUTR has a market cap of 628.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $73.53, while NUTR trades at $41.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.78, whereas NUTR's P/E ratio is 54.68. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to NUTR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is more volatile compared to NUTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check NUTR's competition here
TNL vs YTRA Comparison July 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.5B. In comparison, YTRA has a market cap of 53.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $73.53, while YTRA trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.78, whereas YTRA's P/E ratio is -22.25. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to YTRA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to YTRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check YTRA's competition here
TNL vs AHMA Comparison July 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.5B. In comparison, AHMA has a market cap of 48.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $73.53, while AHMA trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.78, whereas AHMA's P/E ratio is 40.75. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to AHMA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to AHMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check AHMA's competition here
TNL vs MRNOW Comparison July 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.5B. In comparison, MRNOW has a market cap of 39.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $73.53, while MRNOW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.78, whereas MRNOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to MRNOW's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to MRNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check MRNOW's competition here
TNL vs TOUR Comparison July 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.5B. In comparison, TOUR has a market cap of 19.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $73.53, while TOUR trades at $5.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.78, whereas TOUR's P/E ratio is 32.52. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to TOUR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to TOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check TOUR's competition here
TNL vs MKGI Comparison July 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.5B. In comparison, MKGI has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $73.53, while MKGI trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.78, whereas MKGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to MKGI's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to MKGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check MKGI's competition here
TNL vs JXG Comparison July 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.5B. In comparison, JXG has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $73.53, while JXG trades at $6.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.78, whereas JXG's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to JXG's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to JXG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check JXG's competition here
TNL vs MONDW Comparison July 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.5B. In comparison, MONDW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $73.53, while MONDW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.78, whereas MONDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to MONDW's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to MONDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check MONDW's competition here
TNL vs SGLBW Comparison July 2026
TNL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNL stands at 4.5B. In comparison, SGLBW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TNL is priced at $73.53, while SGLBW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNL currently has a P/E ratio of 10.78, whereas SGLBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNL's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SGLBW's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, TNL is less volatile compared to SGLBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNL.Check SGLBW's competition here