Viking Holdings Ltd (NYSE: VIK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Viking Holdings Ltd (NYSE: VIK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, BKNG has a market cap of 130.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $84.15 on the NYSE, while BKNG trades at $167.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.41, whereas BKNG's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.17%, compared to BKNG's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to BKNG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check BKNG's competition here

Viking Holdings Ltd (NYSE: VIK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, ABNB has a market cap of 98.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $84.15 on the NYSE, while ABNB trades at $166.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.41, whereas ABNB's P/E ratio is 37.78. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.17%, compared to ABNB's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to ABNB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check ABNB's competition here

Viking Holdings Ltd (NYSE: VIK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, RCL has a market cap of 65.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $84.15 on the NYSE, while RCL trades at $245.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.41, whereas RCL's P/E ratio is 14.87. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.17%, compared to RCL's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to RCL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check RCL's competition here

Viking Holdings Ltd (NYSE: VIK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, EXPE has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $84.15 on the NYSE, while EXPE trades at $279.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.41, whereas EXPE's P/E ratio is 14.65. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.17%, compared to EXPE's ROE of +1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to EXPE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check EXPE's competition here

Viking Holdings Ltd (NYSE: VIK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, CCL has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $84.15 on the NYSE, while CCL trades at $21.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.41, whereas CCL's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.17%, compared to CCL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to CCL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check CCL's competition here

Viking Holdings Ltd (NYSE: VIK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, TCOM has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $84.15 on the NYSE, while TCOM trades at $40.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.41, whereas TCOM's P/E ratio is 6.34. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.17%, compared to TCOM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to TCOM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check TCOM's competition here

Viking Holdings Ltd (NYSE: VIK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, SABRP has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $84.15 on the NYSE, while SABRP trades at $71.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.41, whereas SABRP's P/E ratio is -35.87. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.17%, compared to SABRP's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to SABRP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check SABRP's competition here

Viking Holdings Ltd (NYSE: VIK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, NCLH has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $84.15 on the NYSE, while NCLH trades at $14.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.41, whereas NCLH's P/E ratio is 6.36. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.17%, compared to NCLH's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to NCLH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check NCLH's competition here

Viking Holdings Ltd (NYSE: VIK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $84.15 on the NYSE, while GBTG trades at $9.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.41, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is 135.43. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.17%, compared to GBTG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check GBTG's competition here

Viking Holdings Ltd (NYSE: VIK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, MMYT has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $84.15 on the NYSE, while MMYT trades at $47.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.41, whereas MMYT's P/E ratio is 133.41. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.17%, compared to MMYT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to MMYT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check MMYT's competition here

Viking Holdings Ltd (NYSE: VIK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, TNL has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $84.15 on the NYSE, while TNL trades at $63.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.41, whereas TNL's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.17%, compared to TNL's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to TNL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check TNL's competition here

Viking Holdings Ltd (NYSE: VIK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, LIND has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $84.15 on the NYSE, while LIND trades at $27.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.41, whereas LIND's P/E ratio is -550.80. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.17%, compared to LIND's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to LIND. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check LIND's competition here

Viking Holdings Ltd (NYSE: VIK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, DESP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $84.15 on the NYSE, while DESP trades at $19.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.41, whereas DESP's P/E ratio is -650.00. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.17%, compared to DESP's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to DESP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check DESP's competition here

Viking Holdings Ltd (NYSE: VIK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, PRSU has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $84.15 on the NYSE, while PRSU trades at $48.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.41, whereas PRSU's P/E ratio is 37.07. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.17%, compared to PRSU's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to PRSU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check PRSU's competition here

Viking Holdings Ltd (NYSE: VIK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, TRIP has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $84.15 on the NYSE, while TRIP trades at $8.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.41, whereas TRIP's P/E ratio is 9.51. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.17%, compared to TRIP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to TRIP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check TRIP's competition here

Viking Holdings Ltd (NYSE: VIK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, NUTR has a market cap of 628.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $84.15 on the NYSE, while NUTR trades at $41.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.41, whereas NUTR's P/E ratio is 54.68. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.17%, compared to NUTR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to NUTR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check NUTR's competition here

Viking Holdings Ltd (NYSE: VIK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, YTRA has a market cap of 65.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $84.15 on the NYSE, while YTRA trades at $1.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.41, whereas YTRA's P/E ratio is -23.69. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.17%, compared to YTRA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to YTRA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check YTRA's competition here

Viking Holdings Ltd (NYSE: VIK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, AHMA has a market cap of 39.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $84.15 on the NYSE, while AHMA trades at $1.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.41, whereas AHMA's P/E ratio is 33.00. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.17%, compared to AHMA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to AHMA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check AHMA's competition here

Viking Holdings Ltd (NYSE: VIK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, TOUR has a market cap of 18.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $84.15 on the NYSE, while TOUR trades at $5.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.41, whereas TOUR's P/E ratio is 11.84. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.17%, compared to TOUR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to TOUR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check TOUR's competition here

Viking Holdings Ltd (NYSE: VIK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, MKGI has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $84.15 on the NYSE, while MKGI trades at $2.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.41, whereas MKGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.17%, compared to MKGI's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to MKGI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check MKGI's competition here

Viking Holdings Ltd (NYSE: VIK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, NTRP has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $84.15 on the NYSE, while NTRP trades at $1.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.41, whereas NTRP's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.17%, compared to NTRP's ROE of -2.55%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to NTRP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check NTRP's competition here

Viking Holdings Ltd (NYSE: VIK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, JXG has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $84.15 on the NYSE, while JXG trades at $6.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.41, whereas JXG's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.17%, compared to JXG's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to JXG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check JXG's competition here

Viking Holdings Ltd (NYSE: VIK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, MONDW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $84.15 on the NYSE, while MONDW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.41, whereas MONDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.17%, compared to MONDW's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to MONDW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check MONDW's competition here

Viking Holdings Ltd (NYSE: VIK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 37.4B. In comparison, SGLBW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $84.15 on the NYSE, while SGLBW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 27.41, whereas SGLBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.17%, compared to SGLBW's ROE of -2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to SGLBW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check SGLBW's competition here