Viking Holdings Ltd (VIK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (VIK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VIK | $100.35 | +1.09% | 44.6B | 36.51 | $2.75 | N/A |
| BKNG | $177.86 | -0.86% | 137.8B | 19.15 | $9.29 | +0.90% |
| ABNB | $140.05 | -2.81% | 83.1B | 34.50 | $4.06 | N/A |
| RCL | $285.85 | -0.71% | 76.7B | 17.29 | $16.53 | +1.76% |
| CCL | $26.10 | -0.23% | 35.7B | 10.96 | $2.38 | +1.15% |
| EXPE | $261.08 | -1.46% | 29.9B | 14.88 | $17.55 | +0.67% |
| TCOM | $42.58 | -2.45% | 26.8B | 6.63 | $6.42 | N/A |
| SABRP | $71.42 | -0.78% | 23.6B | -35.87 | -$1.99 | N/A |
| NCLH | $19.33 | -0.62% | 8.9B | 8.70 | $2.22 | N/A |
| MMYT | $51.64 | -8.59% | 4.9B | 34.66 | $1.49 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
VIK vs BKNG Comparison July 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 44.6B. In comparison, BKNG has a market cap of 137.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $100.35, while BKNG trades at $177.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 36.51, whereas BKNG's P/E ratio is 19.15. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.49%, compared to BKNG's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to BKNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check BKNG's competition here
VIK vs ABNB Comparison July 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 44.6B. In comparison, ABNB has a market cap of 83.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $100.35, while ABNB trades at $140.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 36.51, whereas ABNB's P/E ratio is 34.50. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.49%, compared to ABNB's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to ABNB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check ABNB's competition here
VIK vs RCL Comparison July 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 44.6B. In comparison, RCL has a market cap of 76.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $100.35, while RCL trades at $285.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 36.51, whereas RCL's P/E ratio is 17.29. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.49%, compared to RCL's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to RCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check RCL's competition here
VIK vs CCL Comparison July 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 44.6B. In comparison, CCL has a market cap of 35.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $100.35, while CCL trades at $26.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 36.51, whereas CCL's P/E ratio is 10.96. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.49%, compared to CCL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to CCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check CCL's competition here
VIK vs EXPE Comparison July 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 44.6B. In comparison, EXPE has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $100.35, while EXPE trades at $261.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 36.51, whereas EXPE's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.49%, compared to EXPE's ROE of +1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK and EXPE have similar daily volatility (2.52).Check EXPE's competition here
VIK vs TCOM Comparison July 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 44.6B. In comparison, TCOM has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $100.35, while TCOM trades at $42.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 36.51, whereas TCOM's P/E ratio is 6.63. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.49%, compared to TCOM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to TCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check TCOM's competition here
VIK vs SABRP Comparison July 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 44.6B. In comparison, SABRP has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $100.35, while SABRP trades at $71.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 36.51, whereas SABRP's P/E ratio is -35.87. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.49%, compared to SABRP's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to SABRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check SABRP's competition here
VIK vs NCLH Comparison July 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 44.6B. In comparison, NCLH has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $100.35, while NCLH trades at $19.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 36.51, whereas NCLH's P/E ratio is 8.70. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.49%, compared to NCLH's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to NCLH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check NCLH's competition here
VIK vs MMYT Comparison July 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 44.6B. In comparison, MMYT has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $100.35, while MMYT trades at $51.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 36.51, whereas MMYT's P/E ratio is 34.66. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.49%, compared to MMYT's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to MMYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check MMYT's competition here
VIK vs TNL Comparison July 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 44.6B. In comparison, TNL has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $100.35, while TNL trades at $75.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 36.51, whereas TNL's P/E ratio is 11.23. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.49%, compared to TNL's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to TNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check TNL's competition here
VIK vs DESP Comparison July 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 44.6B. In comparison, DESP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $100.35, while DESP trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 36.51, whereas DESP's P/E ratio is -650.00. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.49%, compared to DESP's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to DESP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check DESP's competition here
VIK vs LIND Comparison July 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 44.6B. In comparison, LIND has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $100.35, while LIND trades at $27.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 36.51, whereas LIND's P/E ratio is -132.38. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.49%, compared to LIND's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to LIND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check LIND's competition here
VIK vs NUTR Comparison July 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 44.6B. In comparison, NUTR has a market cap of 628.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $100.35, while NUTR trades at $41.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 36.51, whereas NUTR's P/E ratio is 54.68. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.49%, compared to NUTR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to NUTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check NUTR's competition here
VIK vs YTRA Comparison July 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 44.6B. In comparison, YTRA has a market cap of 53.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $100.35, while YTRA trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 36.51, whereas YTRA's P/E ratio is -21.99. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.49%, compared to YTRA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to YTRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check YTRA's competition here
VIK vs AHMA Comparison July 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 44.6B. In comparison, AHMA has a market cap of 50.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $100.35, while AHMA trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 36.51, whereas AHMA's P/E ratio is 42.25. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.49%, compared to AHMA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to AHMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check AHMA's competition here
VIK vs MRNOW Comparison July 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 44.6B. In comparison, MRNOW has a market cap of 38.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $100.35, while MRNOW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 36.51, whereas MRNOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.49%, compared to MRNOW's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to MRNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check MRNOW's competition here
VIK vs TOUR Comparison July 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 44.6B. In comparison, TOUR has a market cap of 19.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $100.35, while TOUR trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 36.51, whereas TOUR's P/E ratio is 33.12. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.49%, compared to TOUR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to TOUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check TOUR's competition here
VIK vs MKGI Comparison July 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 44.6B. In comparison, MKGI has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $100.35, while MKGI trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 36.51, whereas MKGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.49%, compared to MKGI's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to MKGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check MKGI's competition here
VIK vs JXG Comparison July 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 44.6B. In comparison, JXG has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $100.35, while JXG trades at $6.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 36.51, whereas JXG's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.49%, compared to JXG's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to JXG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check JXG's competition here
VIK vs MONDW Comparison July 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 44.6B. In comparison, MONDW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $100.35, while MONDW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 36.51, whereas MONDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.49%, compared to MONDW's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to MONDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check MONDW's competition here
VIK vs SGLBW Comparison July 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 44.6B. In comparison, SGLBW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $100.35, while SGLBW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 36.51, whereas SGLBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.49%, compared to SGLBW's ROE of -2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to SGLBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check SGLBW's competition here