Viking Holdings Ltd
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for VIK
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for VIK
Viking Holdings Ltd (VIK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (VIK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VIK | $86.09 | +0.34% | 38.2B | 33.79 | $2.55 | N/A |
| BKNG | $192.03 | +0.01% | 152.1B | 29.01 | $6.62 | +0.42% |
| ABNB | $143.59 | +1.44% | 86.1B | 35.72 | $4.02 | N/A |
| RCL | $282.27 | -1.12% | 77B | 18.07 | $15.62 | +0.89% |
| TCOM | $55.01 | -0.33% | 36B | 7.79 | $7.06 | N/A |
| EXPE | $273.24 | +2.78% | 32B | 27.82 | $9.82 | +0.32% |
| SABRP | $71.42 | -0.78% | 23.6B | -35.87 | -$1.99 | N/A |
| NCLH | $20.26 | -3.48% | 9.2B | 22.03 | $0.92 | N/A |
| TNL | $77.35 | -1.25% | 4.8B | 22.46 | $3.44 | +2.94% |
| MMYT | $49.63 | -2.72% | 4.7B | 95.44 | $0.52 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
VIK vs BKNG Comparison April 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, BKNG has a market cap of 152.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $86.09, while BKNG trades at $192.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 33.79, whereas BKNG's P/E ratio is 29.01. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +2.38%, compared to BKNG's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to BKNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check BKNG's competition here
VIK vs ABNB Comparison April 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, ABNB has a market cap of 86.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $86.09, while ABNB trades at $143.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 33.79, whereas ABNB's P/E ratio is 35.72. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +2.38%, compared to ABNB's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to ABNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check ABNB's competition here
VIK vs RCL Comparison April 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, RCL has a market cap of 77B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $86.09, while RCL trades at $282.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 33.79, whereas RCL's P/E ratio is 18.07. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +2.38%, compared to RCL's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to RCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check RCL's competition here
VIK vs TCOM Comparison April 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, TCOM has a market cap of 36B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $86.09, while TCOM trades at $55.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 33.79, whereas TCOM's P/E ratio is 7.79. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +2.38%, compared to TCOM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to TCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check TCOM's competition here
VIK vs EXPE Comparison April 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, EXPE has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $86.09, while EXPE trades at $273.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 33.79, whereas EXPE's P/E ratio is 27.82. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +2.38%, compared to EXPE's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to EXPE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check EXPE's competition here
VIK vs SABRP Comparison April 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, SABRP has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $86.09, while SABRP trades at $71.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 33.79, whereas SABRP's P/E ratio is -35.87. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +2.38%, compared to SABRP's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to SABRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check SABRP's competition here
VIK vs NCLH Comparison April 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, NCLH has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $86.09, while NCLH trades at $20.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 33.79, whereas NCLH's P/E ratio is 22.03. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +2.38%, compared to NCLH's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to NCLH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check NCLH's competition here
VIK vs TNL Comparison April 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, TNL has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $86.09, while TNL trades at $77.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 33.79, whereas TNL's P/E ratio is 22.46. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +2.38%, compared to TNL's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to TNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check TNL's competition here
VIK vs MMYT Comparison April 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, MMYT has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $86.09, while MMYT trades at $49.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 33.79, whereas MMYT's P/E ratio is 95.44. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +2.38%, compared to MMYT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to MMYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check MMYT's competition here
VIK vs DESP Comparison April 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, DESP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $86.09, while DESP trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 33.79, whereas DESP's P/E ratio is -650.00. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +2.38%, compared to DESP's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to DESP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check DESP's competition here
VIK vs TRIP Comparison April 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, TRIP has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $86.09, while TRIP trades at $11.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 33.79, whereas TRIP's P/E ratio is 37.03. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +2.38%, compared to TRIP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to TRIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check TRIP's competition here
VIK vs LIND Comparison April 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, LIND has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $86.09, while LIND trades at $20.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 33.79, whereas LIND's P/E ratio is -32.14. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +2.38%, compared to LIND's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to LIND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check LIND's competition here
VIK vs SABR Comparison April 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, SABR has a market cap of 778.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $86.09, while SABR trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 33.79, whereas SABR's P/E ratio is -3.03. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +2.38%, compared to SABR's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to SABR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check SABR's competition here
VIK vs NUTR Comparison April 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, NUTR has a market cap of 628.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $86.09, while NUTR trades at $41.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 33.79, whereas NUTR's P/E ratio is -836.00. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +2.38%, compared to NUTR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to NUTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check NUTR's competition here
VIK vs MRNOW Comparison April 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, MRNOW has a market cap of 100.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $86.09, while MRNOW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 33.79, whereas MRNOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +2.38%, compared to MRNOW's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to MRNOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check MRNOW's competition here
VIK vs YTRA Comparison April 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, YTRA has a market cap of 67M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $86.09, while YTRA trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 33.79, whereas YTRA's P/E ratio is -55.50. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +2.38%, compared to YTRA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to YTRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check YTRA's competition here
VIK vs AHMA Comparison April 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, AHMA has a market cap of 39.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $86.09, while AHMA trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 33.79, whereas AHMA's P/E ratio is 33.00. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +2.38%, compared to AHMA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to AHMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check AHMA's competition here
VIK vs TOUR Comparison April 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, TOUR has a market cap of 27.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $86.09, while TOUR trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 33.79, whereas TOUR's P/E ratio is 17.25. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +2.38%, compared to TOUR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to TOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check TOUR's competition here
VIK vs NTRP Comparison April 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, NTRP has a market cap of 23.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $86.09, while NTRP trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 33.79, whereas NTRP's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +2.38%, compared to NTRP's ROE of -2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to NTRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check NTRP's competition here
VIK vs MKGI Comparison April 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, MKGI has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $86.09, while MKGI trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 33.79, whereas MKGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +2.38%, compared to MKGI's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to MKGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check MKGI's competition here
VIK vs JXG Comparison April 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, JXG has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $86.09, while JXG trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 33.79, whereas JXG's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +2.38%, compared to JXG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to JXG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check JXG's competition here
VIK vs MOND Comparison April 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, MOND has a market cap of 87.4K. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $86.09, while MOND trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 33.79, whereas MOND's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +2.38%, compared to MOND's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to MOND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check MOND's competition here
VIK vs SGLBW Comparison April 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, SGLBW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $86.09, while SGLBW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 33.79, whereas SGLBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +2.38%, compared to SGLBW's ROE of -2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to SGLBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check SGLBW's competition here
VIK vs MONDW Comparison April 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, MONDW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $86.09, while MONDW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 33.79, whereas MONDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +2.38%, compared to MONDW's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to MONDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check MONDW's competition here