Viking Holdings Ltd (VIK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (VIK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VIK | $89.49 | +0.96% | 40B | 33.45 | $2.69 | N/A |
| BKNG | $165.36 | +0.35% | 129.8B | 22.10 | $7.58 | +0.94% |
| ABNB | $133.97 | +0.28% | 79.4B | 33.02 | $4.05 | N/A |
| RCL | $284.43 | -0.69% | 78.7B | 17.90 | $16.39 | +1.70% |
| TCOM | $47.34 | -1.26% | 30.9B | 6.83 | $7.04 | N/A |
| EXPE | $230.85 | +2.41% | 26B | 20.07 | $11.32 | +0.78% |
| SABRP | $71.42 | -0.78% | 23.6B | -35.87 | -$1.99 | N/A |
| NCLH | $18.79 | +3.50% | 8.8B | 15.44 | $1.24 | N/A |
| TNL | $71.29 | +2.03% | 4.4B | 19.67 | $3.59 | +3.22% |
| MMYT | $44.37 | -0.05% | 4.3B | 125.47 | $0.36 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
VIK vs BKNG Comparison June 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 40B. In comparison, BKNG has a market cap of 129.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $89.49, while BKNG trades at $165.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 33.45, whereas BKNG's P/E ratio is 22.10. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.47%, compared to BKNG's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to BKNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check BKNG's competition here
VIK vs ABNB Comparison June 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 40B. In comparison, ABNB has a market cap of 79.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $89.49, while ABNB trades at $133.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 33.45, whereas ABNB's P/E ratio is 33.02. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.47%, compared to ABNB's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to ABNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check ABNB's competition here
VIK vs RCL Comparison June 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 40B. In comparison, RCL has a market cap of 78.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $89.49, while RCL trades at $284.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 33.45, whereas RCL's P/E ratio is 17.90. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.47%, compared to RCL's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to RCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check RCL's competition here
VIK vs TCOM Comparison June 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 40B. In comparison, TCOM has a market cap of 30.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $89.49, while TCOM trades at $47.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 33.45, whereas TCOM's P/E ratio is 6.83. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.47%, compared to TCOM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to TCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check TCOM's competition here
VIK vs EXPE Comparison June 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 40B. In comparison, EXPE has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $89.49, while EXPE trades at $230.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 33.45, whereas EXPE's P/E ratio is 20.07. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.47%, compared to EXPE's ROE of +1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to EXPE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check EXPE's competition here
VIK vs SABRP Comparison June 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 40B. In comparison, SABRP has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $89.49, while SABRP trades at $71.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 33.45, whereas SABRP's P/E ratio is -35.87. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.47%, compared to SABRP's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to SABRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check SABRP's competition here
VIK vs NCLH Comparison June 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 40B. In comparison, NCLH has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $89.49, while NCLH trades at $18.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 33.45, whereas NCLH's P/E ratio is 15.44. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.47%, compared to NCLH's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to NCLH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check NCLH's competition here
VIK vs TNL Comparison June 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 40B. In comparison, TNL has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $89.49, while TNL trades at $71.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 33.45, whereas TNL's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.47%, compared to TNL's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to TNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check TNL's competition here
VIK vs MMYT Comparison June 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 40B. In comparison, MMYT has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $89.49, while MMYT trades at $44.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 33.45, whereas MMYT's P/E ratio is 125.47. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.47%, compared to MMYT's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to MMYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check MMYT's competition here
VIK vs DESP Comparison June 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 40B. In comparison, DESP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $89.49, while DESP trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 33.45, whereas DESP's P/E ratio is -650.00. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.47%, compared to DESP's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to DESP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check DESP's competition here
VIK vs LIND Comparison June 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 40B. In comparison, LIND has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $89.49, while LIND trades at $21.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 33.45, whereas LIND's P/E ratio is -41.09. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.47%, compared to LIND's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to LIND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check LIND's competition here
VIK vs SABR Comparison June 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 40B. In comparison, SABR has a market cap of 731.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $89.49, while SABR trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 33.45, whereas SABR's P/E ratio is -2.98. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.47%, compared to SABR's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to SABR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check SABR's competition here
VIK vs NUTR Comparison June 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 40B. In comparison, NUTR has a market cap of 628.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $89.49, while NUTR trades at $41.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 33.45, whereas NUTR's P/E ratio is -836.00. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.47%, compared to NUTR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to NUTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check NUTR's competition here
VIK vs MRNOW Comparison June 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 40B. In comparison, MRNOW has a market cap of 69.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $89.49, while MRNOW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 33.45, whereas MRNOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.47%, compared to MRNOW's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to MRNOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check MRNOW's competition here
VIK vs YTRA Comparison June 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 40B. In comparison, YTRA has a market cap of 55.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $89.49, while YTRA trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 33.45, whereas YTRA's P/E ratio is -45.62. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.47%, compared to YTRA's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to YTRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check YTRA's competition here
VIK vs AHMA Comparison June 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 40B. In comparison, AHMA has a market cap of 31.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $89.49, while AHMA trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 33.45, whereas AHMA's P/E ratio is 26.50. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.47%, compared to AHMA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to AHMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check AHMA's competition here
VIK vs TOUR Comparison June 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 40B. In comparison, TOUR has a market cap of 20.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $89.49, while TOUR trades at $5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 33.45, whereas TOUR's P/E ratio is 13.93. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.47%, compared to TOUR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to TOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check TOUR's competition here
VIK vs NTRP Comparison June 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 40B. In comparison, NTRP has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $89.49, while NTRP trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 33.45, whereas NTRP's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.47%, compared to NTRP's ROE of -2.62%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to NTRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check NTRP's competition here
VIK vs MKGI Comparison June 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 40B. In comparison, MKGI has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $89.49, while MKGI trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 33.45, whereas MKGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.47%, compared to MKGI's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to MKGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check MKGI's competition here
VIK vs JXG Comparison June 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 40B. In comparison, JXG has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $89.49, while JXG trades at $8.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 33.45, whereas JXG's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.47%, compared to JXG's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to JXG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check JXG's competition here
VIK vs MOND Comparison June 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 40B. In comparison, MOND has a market cap of 87.4K. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $89.49, while MOND trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 33.45, whereas MOND's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.47%, compared to MOND's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to MOND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check MOND's competition here
VIK vs MONDW Comparison June 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 40B. In comparison, MONDW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $89.49, while MONDW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 33.45, whereas MONDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.47%, compared to MONDW's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to MONDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check MONDW's competition here
VIK vs SGLBW Comparison June 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 40B. In comparison, SGLBW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $89.49, while SGLBW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 33.45, whereas SGLBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.47%, compared to SGLBW's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to SGLBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check SGLBW's competition here