Viking Holdings Ltd (VIK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (VIK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VIK | $99.27 | +2.45% | 44.1B | 36.09 | $2.75 | N/A |
| BKNG | $179.40 | -0.03% | 139B | 19.31 | $9.29 | +0.90% |
| ABNB | $144.10 | -0.58% | 85.5B | 35.49 | $4.06 | N/A |
| RCL | $287.90 | +0.61% | 77.2B | 17.42 | $16.53 | +1.74% |
| CCL | $26.16 | +0.46% | 35.8B | 10.98 | $2.38 | +1.15% |
| EXPE | $264.94 | -0.05% | 30.3B | 15.10 | $17.55 | +0.67% |
| TCOM | $43.65 | -1.22% | 27.5B | 6.80 | $6.42 | N/A |
| SABRP | $71.42 | -0.78% | 23.6B | -35.87 | -$1.99 | N/A |
| NCLH | $19.45 | -0.21% | 8.9B | 8.77 | $2.22 | N/A |
| MMYT | $56.49 | +6.14% | 5.4B | 37.91 | $1.49 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
VIK vs BKNG Comparison July 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 44.1B. In comparison, BKNG has a market cap of 139B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $99.27, while BKNG trades at $179.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas BKNG's P/E ratio is 19.31. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.49%, compared to BKNG's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to BKNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check BKNG's competition here
VIK vs ABNB Comparison July 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 44.1B. In comparison, ABNB has a market cap of 85.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $99.27, while ABNB trades at $144.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas ABNB's P/E ratio is 35.49. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.49%, compared to ABNB's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to ABNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check ABNB's competition here
VIK vs RCL Comparison July 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 44.1B. In comparison, RCL has a market cap of 77.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $99.27, while RCL trades at $287.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas RCL's P/E ratio is 17.42. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.49%, compared to RCL's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to RCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check RCL's competition here
VIK vs CCL Comparison July 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 44.1B. In comparison, CCL has a market cap of 35.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $99.27, while CCL trades at $26.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas CCL's P/E ratio is 10.98. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.49%, compared to CCL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to CCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check CCL's competition here
VIK vs EXPE Comparison July 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 44.1B. In comparison, EXPE has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $99.27, while EXPE trades at $264.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas EXPE's P/E ratio is 15.10. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.49%, compared to EXPE's ROE of +1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to EXPE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check EXPE's competition here
VIK vs TCOM Comparison July 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 44.1B. In comparison, TCOM has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $99.27, while TCOM trades at $43.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas TCOM's P/E ratio is 6.80. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.49%, compared to TCOM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to TCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check TCOM's competition here
VIK vs SABRP Comparison July 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 44.1B. In comparison, SABRP has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $99.27, while SABRP trades at $71.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas SABRP's P/E ratio is -35.87. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.49%, compared to SABRP's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to SABRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check SABRP's competition here
VIK vs NCLH Comparison July 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 44.1B. In comparison, NCLH has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $99.27, while NCLH trades at $19.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas NCLH's P/E ratio is 8.77. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.49%, compared to NCLH's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to NCLH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check NCLH's competition here
VIK vs MMYT Comparison July 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 44.1B. In comparison, MMYT has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $99.27, while MMYT trades at $56.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas MMYT's P/E ratio is 37.91. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.49%, compared to MMYT's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to MMYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check MMYT's competition here
VIK vs TNL Comparison July 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 44.1B. In comparison, TNL has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $99.27, while TNL trades at $73.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas TNL's P/E ratio is 10.90. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.49%, compared to TNL's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to TNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check TNL's competition here
VIK vs DESP Comparison July 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 44.1B. In comparison, DESP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $99.27, while DESP trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas DESP's P/E ratio is -650.00. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.49%, compared to DESP's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to DESP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check DESP's competition here
VIK vs LIND Comparison July 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 44.1B. In comparison, LIND has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $99.27, while LIND trades at $28.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas LIND's P/E ratio is -135.48. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.49%, compared to LIND's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to LIND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check LIND's competition here
VIK vs NUTR Comparison July 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 44.1B. In comparison, NUTR has a market cap of 628.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $99.27, while NUTR trades at $41.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas NUTR's P/E ratio is 54.68. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.49%, compared to NUTR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to NUTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check NUTR's competition here
VIK vs YTRA Comparison July 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 44.1B. In comparison, YTRA has a market cap of 53.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $99.27, while YTRA trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas YTRA's P/E ratio is -22.00. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.49%, compared to YTRA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to YTRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check YTRA's competition here
VIK vs AHMA Comparison July 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 44.1B. In comparison, AHMA has a market cap of 48.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $99.27, while AHMA trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas AHMA's P/E ratio is 40.75. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.49%, compared to AHMA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to AHMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check AHMA's competition here
VIK vs MRNOW Comparison July 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 44.1B. In comparison, MRNOW has a market cap of 37.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $99.27, while MRNOW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas MRNOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.49%, compared to MRNOW's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to MRNOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check MRNOW's competition here
VIK vs TOUR Comparison July 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 44.1B. In comparison, TOUR has a market cap of 19.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $99.27, while TOUR trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas TOUR's P/E ratio is 32.49. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.49%, compared to TOUR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to TOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check TOUR's competition here
VIK vs MKGI Comparison July 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 44.1B. In comparison, MKGI has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $99.27, while MKGI trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas MKGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.49%, compared to MKGI's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to MKGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check MKGI's competition here
VIK vs JXG Comparison July 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 44.1B. In comparison, JXG has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $99.27, while JXG trades at $6.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas JXG's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.49%, compared to JXG's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to JXG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check JXG's competition here
VIK vs MONDW Comparison July 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 44.1B. In comparison, MONDW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $99.27, while MONDW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas MONDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.49%, compared to MONDW's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to MONDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check MONDW's competition here
VIK vs SGLBW Comparison July 2026
VIK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 44.1B. In comparison, SGLBW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $99.27, while SGLBW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 36.09, whereas SGLBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.49%, compared to SGLBW's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to SGLBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check SGLBW's competition here