
Mondee Holdings, Inc. (MOND) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MOND) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MOND | $0.00 | +0.00% | 87.4K | -0.00 | -$1.17 | N/A |
| BKNG | $165.84 | -0.99% | 128.5B | 21.88 | $7.58 | +0.97% |
| ABNB | $133.54 | -0.13% | 79.3B | 32.97 | $4.05 | N/A |
| RCL | $280.00 | -4.53% | 75.1B | 17.08 | $16.39 | +1.78% |
| VIK | $89.94 | -0.06% | 39.9B | 33.43 | $2.69 | N/A |
| TCOM | $47.69 | -0.77% | 30.7B | 6.77 | $7.04 | N/A |
| EXPE | $228.88 | +0.75% | 26.2B | 20.22 | $11.32 | +0.77% |
| SABRP | $71.42 | -0.78% | 23.6B | -35.87 | -$1.99 | N/A |
| NCLH | $18.75 | -1.99% | 8.6B | 15.10 | $1.24 | N/A |
| TNL | $71.70 | +1.53% | 4.5B | 19.97 | $3.59 | +3.18% |
Stock Comparison
MOND vs BKNG Comparison June 2026
MOND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOND stands at 87.4K. In comparison, BKNG has a market cap of 128.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MOND is priced at $0.00, while BKNG trades at $165.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOND currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BKNG's P/E ratio is 21.88. In terms of profitability, MOND's ROE is -1.30%, compared to BKNG's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, MOND is less volatile compared to BKNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOND.Check BKNG's competition here
MOND vs ABNB Comparison June 2026
MOND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOND stands at 87.4K. In comparison, ABNB has a market cap of 79.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MOND is priced at $0.00, while ABNB trades at $133.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOND currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ABNB's P/E ratio is 32.97. In terms of profitability, MOND's ROE is -1.30%, compared to ABNB's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MOND is less volatile compared to ABNB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOND.Check ABNB's competition here
MOND vs RCL Comparison June 2026
MOND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOND stands at 87.4K. In comparison, RCL has a market cap of 75.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MOND is priced at $0.00, while RCL trades at $280.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOND currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas RCL's P/E ratio is 17.08. In terms of profitability, MOND's ROE is -1.30%, compared to RCL's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MOND is less volatile compared to RCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOND.Check RCL's competition here
MOND vs VIK Comparison June 2026
MOND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOND stands at 87.4K. In comparison, VIK has a market cap of 39.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MOND is priced at $0.00, while VIK trades at $89.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOND currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas VIK's P/E ratio is 33.43. In terms of profitability, MOND's ROE is -1.30%, compared to VIK's ROE of +1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MOND is less volatile compared to VIK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOND.Check VIK's competition here
MOND vs TCOM Comparison June 2026
MOND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOND stands at 87.4K. In comparison, TCOM has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MOND is priced at $0.00, while TCOM trades at $47.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOND currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TCOM's P/E ratio is 6.77. In terms of profitability, MOND's ROE is -1.30%, compared to TCOM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MOND is less volatile compared to TCOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOND.Check TCOM's competition here
MOND vs EXPE Comparison June 2026
MOND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOND stands at 87.4K. In comparison, EXPE has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MOND is priced at $0.00, while EXPE trades at $228.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOND currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas EXPE's P/E ratio is 20.22. In terms of profitability, MOND's ROE is -1.30%, compared to EXPE's ROE of +1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MOND is less volatile compared to EXPE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOND.Check EXPE's competition here
MOND vs SABRP Comparison June 2026
MOND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOND stands at 87.4K. In comparison, SABRP has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MOND is priced at $0.00, while SABRP trades at $71.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOND currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SABRP's P/E ratio is -35.87. In terms of profitability, MOND's ROE is -1.30%, compared to SABRP's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MOND is less volatile compared to SABRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOND.Check SABRP's competition here
MOND vs NCLH Comparison June 2026
MOND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOND stands at 87.4K. In comparison, NCLH has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MOND is priced at $0.00, while NCLH trades at $18.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOND currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NCLH's P/E ratio is 15.10. In terms of profitability, MOND's ROE is -1.30%, compared to NCLH's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MOND is less volatile compared to NCLH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOND.Check NCLH's competition here
MOND vs TNL Comparison June 2026
MOND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOND stands at 87.4K. In comparison, TNL has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MOND is priced at $0.00, while TNL trades at $71.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOND currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TNL's P/E ratio is 19.97. In terms of profitability, MOND's ROE is -1.30%, compared to TNL's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MOND is less volatile compared to TNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOND.Check TNL's competition here
MOND vs MMYT Comparison June 2026
MOND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOND stands at 87.4K. In comparison, MMYT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MOND is priced at $0.00, while MMYT trades at $44.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOND currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MMYT's P/E ratio is 122.47. In terms of profitability, MOND's ROE is -1.30%, compared to MMYT's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MOND is less volatile compared to MMYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOND.Check MMYT's competition here
MOND vs DESP Comparison June 2026
MOND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOND stands at 87.4K. In comparison, DESP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MOND is priced at $0.00, while DESP trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOND currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas DESP's P/E ratio is -650.00. In terms of profitability, MOND's ROE is -1.30%, compared to DESP's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, MOND and DESP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DESP's competition here
MOND vs LIND Comparison June 2026
MOND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOND stands at 87.4K. In comparison, LIND has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MOND is priced at $0.00, while LIND trades at $21.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOND currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas LIND's P/E ratio is -40.11. In terms of profitability, MOND's ROE is -1.30%, compared to LIND's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MOND is less volatile compared to LIND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOND.Check LIND's competition here
MOND vs SABR Comparison June 2026
MOND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOND stands at 87.4K. In comparison, SABR has a market cap of 656.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MOND is priced at $0.00, while SABR trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOND currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SABR's P/E ratio is -2.68. In terms of profitability, MOND's ROE is -1.30%, compared to SABR's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MOND is less volatile compared to SABR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOND.Check SABR's competition here
MOND vs NUTR Comparison June 2026
MOND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOND stands at 87.4K. In comparison, NUTR has a market cap of 628.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MOND is priced at $0.00, while NUTR trades at $41.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOND currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NUTR's P/E ratio is -836.00. In terms of profitability, MOND's ROE is -1.30%, compared to NUTR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MOND is less volatile compared to NUTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOND.Check NUTR's competition here
MOND vs MRNOW Comparison June 2026
MOND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOND stands at 87.4K. In comparison, MRNOW has a market cap of 69.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MOND is priced at $0.00, while MRNOW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOND currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MRNOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MOND's ROE is -1.30%, compared to MRNOW's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MOND is less volatile compared to MRNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOND.Check MRNOW's competition here
MOND vs YTRA Comparison June 2026
MOND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOND stands at 87.4K. In comparison, YTRA has a market cap of 54.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MOND is priced at $0.00, while YTRA trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOND currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas YTRA's P/E ratio is -44.86. In terms of profitability, MOND's ROE is -1.30%, compared to YTRA's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MOND is less volatile compared to YTRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOND.Check YTRA's competition here
MOND vs AHMA Comparison June 2026
MOND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOND stands at 87.4K. In comparison, AHMA has a market cap of 30.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MOND is priced at $0.00, while AHMA trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOND currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas AHMA's P/E ratio is 25.75. In terms of profitability, MOND's ROE is -1.30%, compared to AHMA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MOND is less volatile compared to AHMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOND.Check AHMA's competition here
MOND vs TOUR Comparison June 2026
MOND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOND stands at 87.4K. In comparison, TOUR has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MOND is priced at $0.00, while TOUR trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOND currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TOUR's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, MOND's ROE is -1.30%, compared to TOUR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MOND is less volatile compared to TOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOND.Check TOUR's competition here
MOND vs NTRP Comparison June 2026
MOND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOND stands at 87.4K. In comparison, NTRP has a market cap of 17.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MOND is priced at $0.00, while NTRP trades at $2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOND currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NTRP's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, MOND's ROE is -1.30%, compared to NTRP's ROE of -2.62%. Regarding short-term risk, MOND is less volatile compared to NTRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOND.Check NTRP's competition here
MOND vs MKGI Comparison June 2026
MOND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOND stands at 87.4K. In comparison, MKGI has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MOND is priced at $0.00, while MKGI trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOND currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MKGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MOND's ROE is -1.30%, compared to MKGI's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MOND is less volatile compared to MKGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOND.Check MKGI's competition here
MOND vs JXG Comparison June 2026
MOND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOND stands at 87.4K. In comparison, JXG has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MOND is priced at $0.00, while JXG trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOND currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas JXG's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, MOND's ROE is -1.30%, compared to JXG's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, MOND is less volatile compared to JXG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOND.Check JXG's competition here
MOND vs MONDW Comparison June 2026
MOND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOND stands at 87.4K. In comparison, MONDW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MOND is priced at $0.00, while MONDW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOND currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MONDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MOND's ROE is -1.30%, compared to MONDW's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MOND is less volatile compared to MONDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOND.Check MONDW's competition here
MOND vs SGLBW Comparison June 2026
MOND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOND stands at 87.4K. In comparison, SGLBW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MOND is priced at $0.00, while SGLBW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOND currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SGLBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MOND's ROE is -1.30%, compared to SGLBW's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, MOND is less volatile compared to SGLBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOND.Check SGLBW's competition here