Tripadvisor, Inc.
Tripadvisor, Inc. (TRIP) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TRIP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRIP | $9.51 | -1.30% | 1.1B | 87.27 | $0.11 | N/A |
| BKNG | $154.59 | -0.28% | 119.7B | 20.38 | $7.58 | +1.01% |
| ABNB | $132.72 | -0.19% | 79.5B | 32.92 | $4.06 | N/A |
| RCL | $259.86 | -1.64% | 71.2B | 16.20 | $16.39 | +1.60% |
| VIK | $84.99 | +3.43% | 38.4B | 33.73 | $2.57 | N/A |
| TCOM | $50.09 | -4.18% | 32.3B | 7.17 | $7.01 | N/A |
| EXPE | $217.49 | -0.03% | 25.4B | 19.18 | $11.32 | +0.77% |
| SABRP | $71.42 | -0.78% | 23.6B | -35.87 | -$1.99 | N/A |
| NCLH | $15.68 | -2.37% | 7.3B | 12.85 | $1.24 | N/A |
| MMYT | $42.50 | -1.46% | 4.1B | 83.17 | $0.52 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TRIP vs BKNG Comparison May 2026
TRIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIP stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BKNG has a market cap of 119.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIP is priced at $9.51, while BKNG trades at $154.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 87.27, whereas BKNG's P/E ratio is 20.38. In terms of profitability, TRIP's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BKNG's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIP is more volatile compared to BKNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIP.Check BKNG's competition here
TRIP vs ABNB Comparison May 2026
TRIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIP stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ABNB has a market cap of 79.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIP is priced at $9.51, while ABNB trades at $132.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 87.27, whereas ABNB's P/E ratio is 32.92. In terms of profitability, TRIP's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ABNB's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIP is more volatile compared to ABNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIP.Check ABNB's competition here
TRIP vs RCL Comparison May 2026
TRIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIP stands at 1.1B. In comparison, RCL has a market cap of 71.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIP is priced at $9.51, while RCL trades at $259.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 87.27, whereas RCL's P/E ratio is 16.20. In terms of profitability, TRIP's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RCL's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIP is more volatile compared to RCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIP.Check RCL's competition here
TRIP vs VIK Comparison May 2026
TRIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIP stands at 1.1B. In comparison, VIK has a market cap of 38.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIP is priced at $9.51, while VIK trades at $84.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 87.27, whereas VIK's P/E ratio is 33.73. In terms of profitability, TRIP's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VIK's ROE of +2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIP is more volatile compared to VIK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIP.Check VIK's competition here
TRIP vs TCOM Comparison May 2026
TRIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIP stands at 1.1B. In comparison, TCOM has a market cap of 32.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIP is priced at $9.51, while TCOM trades at $50.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 87.27, whereas TCOM's P/E ratio is 7.17. In terms of profitability, TRIP's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TCOM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIP is more volatile compared to TCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIP.Check TCOM's competition here
TRIP vs EXPE Comparison May 2026
TRIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIP stands at 1.1B. In comparison, EXPE has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIP is priced at $9.51, while EXPE trades at $217.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 87.27, whereas EXPE's P/E ratio is 19.18. In terms of profitability, TRIP's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EXPE's ROE of +1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIP is less volatile compared to EXPE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIP.Check EXPE's competition here
TRIP vs SABRP Comparison May 2026
TRIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIP stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SABRP has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIP is priced at $9.51, while SABRP trades at $71.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 87.27, whereas SABRP's P/E ratio is -35.87. In terms of profitability, TRIP's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SABRP's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIP is less volatile compared to SABRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIP.Check SABRP's competition here
TRIP vs NCLH Comparison May 2026
TRIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIP stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NCLH has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIP is priced at $9.51, while NCLH trades at $15.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 87.27, whereas NCLH's P/E ratio is 12.85. In terms of profitability, TRIP's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NCLH's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIP is less volatile compared to NCLH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIP.Check NCLH's competition here
TRIP vs MMYT Comparison May 2026
TRIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIP stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MMYT has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIP is priced at $9.51, while MMYT trades at $42.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 87.27, whereas MMYT's P/E ratio is 83.17. In terms of profitability, TRIP's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MMYT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIP is more volatile compared to MMYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIP.Check MMYT's competition here
TRIP vs TNL Comparison May 2026
TRIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIP stands at 1.1B. In comparison, TNL has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIP is priced at $9.51, while TNL trades at $62.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 87.27, whereas TNL's P/E ratio is 17.70. In terms of profitability, TRIP's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TNL's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIP is more volatile compared to TNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIP.Check TNL's competition here
TRIP vs DESP Comparison May 2026
TRIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIP stands at 1.1B. In comparison, DESP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIP is priced at $9.51, while DESP trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 87.27, whereas DESP's P/E ratio is -650.00. In terms of profitability, TRIP's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DESP's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIP is more volatile compared to DESP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIP.Check DESP's competition here
TRIP vs LIND Comparison May 2026
TRIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIP stands at 1.1B. In comparison, LIND has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRIP is priced at $9.51, while LIND trades at $18.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 87.27, whereas LIND's P/E ratio is -35.85. In terms of profitability, TRIP's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LIND's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIP is less volatile compared to LIND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIP.Check LIND's competition here
TRIP vs NUTR Comparison May 2026
TRIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIP stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NUTR has a market cap of 628.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIP is priced at $9.51, while NUTR trades at $41.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 87.27, whereas NUTR's P/E ratio is -836.00. In terms of profitability, TRIP's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NUTR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIP is more volatile compared to NUTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIP.Check NUTR's competition here
TRIP vs SABR Comparison May 2026
TRIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIP stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SABR has a market cap of 624.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIP is priced at $9.51, while SABR trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 87.27, whereas SABR's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, TRIP's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SABR's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIP is less volatile compared to SABR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIP.Check SABR's competition here
TRIP vs MRNOW Comparison May 2026
TRIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIP stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MRNOW has a market cap of 79.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIP is priced at $9.51, while MRNOW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 87.27, whereas MRNOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRIP's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MRNOW's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIP is more volatile compared to MRNOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIP.Check MRNOW's competition here
TRIP vs YTRA Comparison May 2026
TRIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIP stands at 1.1B. In comparison, YTRA has a market cap of 54.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIP is priced at $9.51, while YTRA trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 87.27, whereas YTRA's P/E ratio is -45.50. In terms of profitability, TRIP's ROE is +0.03%, compared to YTRA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIP is less volatile compared to YTRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIP.Check YTRA's competition here
TRIP vs AHMA Comparison May 2026
TRIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIP stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AHMA has a market cap of 34.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIP is priced at $9.51, while AHMA trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 87.27, whereas AHMA's P/E ratio is 28.75. In terms of profitability, TRIP's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AHMA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIP is less volatile compared to AHMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIP.Check AHMA's competition here
TRIP vs TOUR Comparison May 2026
TRIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIP stands at 1.1B. In comparison, TOUR has a market cap of 23.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIP is priced at $9.51, while TOUR trades at $6.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 87.27, whereas TOUR's P/E ratio is 15.60. In terms of profitability, TRIP's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TOUR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIP is less volatile compared to TOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIP.Check TOUR's competition here
TRIP vs NTRP Comparison May 2026
TRIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIP stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NTRP has a market cap of 18.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIP is priced at $9.51, while NTRP trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 87.27, whereas NTRP's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, TRIP's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NTRP's ROE of -2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIP is less volatile compared to NTRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIP.Check NTRP's competition here
TRIP vs MKGI Comparison May 2026
TRIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIP stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MKGI has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIP is priced at $9.51, while MKGI trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 87.27, whereas MKGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRIP's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MKGI's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIP is less volatile compared to MKGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIP.Check MKGI's competition here
TRIP vs JXG Comparison May 2026
TRIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIP stands at 1.1B. In comparison, JXG has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TRIP is priced at $9.51, while JXG trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 87.27, whereas JXG's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, TRIP's ROE is +0.03%, compared to JXG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIP is less volatile compared to JXG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIP.Check JXG's competition here
TRIP vs MOND Comparison May 2026
TRIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIP stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MOND has a market cap of 87.4K. Regarding current trading prices, TRIP is priced at $9.51, while MOND trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 87.27, whereas MOND's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TRIP's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MOND's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIP is more volatile compared to MOND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIP.Check MOND's competition here
TRIP vs SGLBW Comparison May 2026
TRIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIP stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SGLBW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRIP is priced at $9.51, while SGLBW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 87.27, whereas SGLBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRIP's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SGLBW's ROE of -2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIP is less volatile compared to SGLBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIP.Check SGLBW's competition here
TRIP vs MONDW Comparison May 2026
TRIP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRIP stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MONDW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRIP is priced at $9.51, while MONDW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRIP currently has a P/E ratio of 87.27, whereas MONDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRIP's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MONDW's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TRIP is less volatile compared to MONDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRIP.Check MONDW's competition here