Atlassian Corporation

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 347.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while SAP trades at $298.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 53.42. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 257.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while CRM trades at $269.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 42.05. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 215.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while INTU trades at $773.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 63.15. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 209.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while NOW trades at $1,009.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 137.01. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 192.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while UBER trades at $92.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 16.12. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 149.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while SHOP trades at $114.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 93.31. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is less volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 113.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while APP trades at $336.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 60.77. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is less volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 110B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while MSTR trades at $402.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -18.08. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is less volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 84.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while CDNS trades at $310.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 78.70. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 72.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while SNOW trades at $217.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is -51.74. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 66.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while ADSK trades at $310.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 66.44. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 63.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while WDAY trades at $237.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 131.33. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 46.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while DDOG trades at $135.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 287.38. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is less volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 44.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while FICO trades at $1,842.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 79.06. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, TTD has a market cap of 36.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while TTD trades at $73.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas TTD's P/E ratio is 89.73. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TTD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to TTD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while ANSS trades at $353.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 52.49. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while STRK trades at $118.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is less volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while HUBS trades at $546.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is -1269.86. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to HUBS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is less volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while STRF trades at $114.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is less volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while TYL trades at $583.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 87.88. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while ZM trades at $77.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 23.29. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while PTC trades at $173.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 47.61. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while SSNC trades at $83.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 25.79. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while GRAB trades at $4.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 489.50. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is less volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while GWRE trades at $227.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 529.16. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is less volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while DUOL trades at $397.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 196.47. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while AZPN trades at $264.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to AZPN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while DT trades at $54.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 34.39. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while BSY trades at $54.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 69.36. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while DOCU trades at $77.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 14.67. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while MNDY trades at $299.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 296.59. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is less volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while PAYC trades at $228.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 32.40. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is less volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, QXO has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while QXO trades at $21.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas QXO's P/E ratio is -61.69. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to QXO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is less volatile compared to QXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while MANH trades at $198.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 56.78. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while BKI trades at $75.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while XM trades at $18.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while CDAY trades at $69.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CDAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while NICE trades at $168.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 23.47. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while PCOR trades at $70.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is -81.90. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is less volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, U has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while U trades at $24.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas U's P/E ratio is -21.69. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to U's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is less volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while PCTY trades at $180.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 44.79. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is less volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while TTAN trades at $108.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is -29.24. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is less volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while ESTC trades at $84.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is -80.94. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ESTC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while DAY trades at $55.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is 346.50. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is less volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while DSGX trades at $101.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 61.54. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while SRAD trades at $27.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 139.10. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is less volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while APPF trades at $232.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 43.32. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while NATI trades at $59.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while SMAR trades at $56.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while OTEX trades at $29.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is less volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while CVLT trades at $170.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 100.98. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while GTLB trades at $45.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is 501.67. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GTLB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is less volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while LYFT trades at $15.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 104.70. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is less volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while BULL trades at $14.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is 11.30. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BULL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is less volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while CWAN trades at $21.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CWAN's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while COUP trades at $80.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while IDCC trades at $221.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 17.53. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while QTWO trades at $92.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is -271.49. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to QTWO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, VERX has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while VERX trades at $34.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas VERX's P/E ratio is -119.72. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to VERX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to VERX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, DAVEW has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while DAVEW trades at $2.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas DAVEW's P/E ratio is -9.71. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DAVEW's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is less volatile compared to DAVEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while LIF trades at $63.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 492.08. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to LIF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while BILL trades at $46.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is -2327.50. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while FROG trades at $41.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is -58.23. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is less volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, RUMBW has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while RUMBW trades at $3.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas RUMBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to RUMBW's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is less volatile compared to RUMBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, SOUN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while SOUN trades at $11.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas SOUN's P/E ratio is -18.45. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SOUN's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is less volatile compared to SOUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while PEGA trades at $52.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 48.78. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, ETWO-WT has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while ETWO-WT trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas ETWO-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ETWO-WT's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is less volatile compared to ETWO-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, RIOT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while RIOT trades at $12.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas RIOT's P/E ratio is -8.91. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to RIOT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is less volatile compared to RIOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, FRSH has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while FRSH trades at $14.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas FRSH's P/E ratio is -61.46. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to FRSH's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is less volatile compared to FRSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, GRND has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while GRND trades at $22.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas GRND's P/E ratio is -36.95. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GRND's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to GRND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while RUM trades at $9.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -6.61. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to RUM's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is less volatile compared to RUM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while CVT trades at $8.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while PYCR trades at $22.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, INTA has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while INTA trades at $47.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas INTA's P/E ratio is -199.21. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to INTA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to INTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while PWSC trades at $22.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while WK trades at $67.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas WK's P/E ratio is -58.47. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to WK's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to WK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while ZI trades at $10.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 85.92. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is less volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while DAVE trades at $270.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 75.78. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is less volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while ZETA trades at $15.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is -60.64. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, BL has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while BL trades at $56.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas BL's P/E ratio is 41.28. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BL's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to BL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while AYX trades at $48.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, CLSK has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while CLSK trades at $12.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas CLSK's P/E ratio is -11.23. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CLSK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is less volatile compared to CLSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while ENV trades at $63.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while INST trades at $23.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, CALX has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while CALX trades at $52.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas CALX's P/E ratio is -101.80. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CALX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to CALX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while COMP trades at $6.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is -48.65. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to COMP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, NCNO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while NCNO trades at $27.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas NCNO's P/E ratio is -111.92. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NCNO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to NCNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, KC has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while KC trades at $11.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas KC's P/E ratio is -10.96. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to KC's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to KC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, ASAN has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while ASAN trades at $13.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas ASAN's P/E ratio is -13.51. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ASAN's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to ASAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, BLKB has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while BLKB trades at $64.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas BLKB's P/E ratio is -11.60. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BLKB's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to BLKB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, AGYS has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while AGYS trades at $112.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas AGYS's P/E ratio is 136.66. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to AGYS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is less volatile compared to AGYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, BRZE has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while BRZE trades at $28.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas BRZE's P/E ratio is -27.90. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BRZE's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is less volatile compared to BRZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, ALIT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while ALIT trades at $5.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas ALIT's P/E ratio is -98.50. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ALIT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is less volatile compared to ALIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while GBTG trades at $6.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is -63.55. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GBTG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, ALKT has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while ALKT trades at $29.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas ALKT's P/E ratio is -78.95. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ALKT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is less volatile compared to ALKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, ALRM has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while ALRM trades at $57.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas ALRM's P/E ratio is 24.07. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ALRM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to ALRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, PAR has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while PAR trades at $67.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas PAR's P/E ratio is -26.31. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PAR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is less volatile compared to PAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, RNG has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while RNG trades at $29.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas RNG's P/E ratio is -68.53. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to RNG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is less volatile compared to RNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.

TEAM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 54.4B. In comparison, YOU has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $206.78, while YOU trades at $28.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of -125.33, whereas YOU's P/E ratio is 17.67. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.11%, compared to YOU's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is less volatile compared to YOU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.