SolarWinds Corporation
SolarWinds Corporation SWI Peers
See (SWI) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SWI | $18.49 | N/A | 3.2B | 28.89 | $0.64 | N/A |
| MSFT | $457.36 | -0.72% | 3.4T | 35.32 | $12.95 | +0.71% |
| ORCL | $163.84 | +1.19% | 459.4B | 38.46 | $4.26 | +1.04% |
| PLTR | $123.76 | +0.30% | 292.1B | 538.09 | $0.23 | N/A |
| ADBE | $412.08 | -0.25% | 175.6B | 27.24 | $15.13 | N/A |
| PANW | $187.83 | +0.20% | 125.2B | 107.95 | $1.74 | N/A |
| CRWD | $468.99 | -0.69% | 116.8B | -5210.94 | -$0.09 | N/A |
| FTNT | $104.51 | -0.22% | 80B | 43.01 | $2.43 | N/A |
| SNPS | $462.43 | -9.64% | 71.5B | 55.45 | $8.34 | N/A |
| VMW | $142.48 | -4.96% | 61.5B | 42.92 | $3.32 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SWI vs MSFT Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, MSFT has a market cap of 3.4T. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while MSFT trades at $457.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas MSFT's P/E ratio is 35.32. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MSFT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to MSFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs ORCL Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ORCL has a market cap of 459.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while ORCL trades at $163.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas ORCL's P/E ratio is 38.46. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ORCL's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to ORCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs PLTR Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PLTR has a market cap of 292.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while PLTR trades at $123.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas PLTR's P/E ratio is 538.09. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PLTR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to PLTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs ADBE Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 175.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while ADBE trades at $412.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 27.24. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs PANW Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PANW has a market cap of 125.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while PANW trades at $187.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas PANW's P/E ratio is 107.95. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PANW's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to PANW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs CRWD Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CRWD has a market cap of 116.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while CRWD trades at $468.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas CRWD's P/E ratio is -5210.94. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CRWD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to CRWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs FTNT Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, FTNT has a market cap of 80B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while FTNT trades at $104.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas FTNT's P/E ratio is 43.01. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FTNT's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to FTNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs SNPS Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SNPS has a market cap of 71.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while SNPS trades at $462.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas SNPS's P/E ratio is 55.45. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SNPS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to SNPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs VMW Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, VMW has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while VMW trades at $142.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas VMW's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VMW's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to VMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs HOOD Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, HOOD has a market cap of 57.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while HOOD trades at $65.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas HOOD's P/E ratio is 37.21. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HOOD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to HOOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs NET Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NET has a market cap of 56.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while NET trades at $161.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas NET's P/E ratio is -674.71. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NET's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to NET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs CRWV Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CRWV has a market cap of 55.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while CRWV trades at $116.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas CRWV's P/E ratio is -45.73. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CRWV's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to CRWV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs SQ Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SQ has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while SQ trades at $83.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas SQ's P/E ratio is 49.98. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SQ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to SQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs ZS Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ZS has a market cap of 39.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while ZS trades at $253.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas ZS's P/E ratio is -2536.50. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ZS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to ZS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs XYZ Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, XYZ has a market cap of 38B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while XYZ trades at $61.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas XYZ's P/E ratio is 14.99. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to XYZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to XYZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs NETE Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NETE has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while NETE trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas NETE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NETE's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to NETE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs IOT Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, IOT has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while IOT trades at $46.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas IOT's P/E ratio is -166.00. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IOT's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to IOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs SPLK Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SPLK has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while SPLK trades at $156.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas SPLK's P/E ratio is 103.22. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SPLK's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is more volatile compared to SPLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs GDDY Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, GDDY has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while GDDY trades at $179.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas GDDY's P/E ratio is 34.39. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GDDY's ROE of +2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to GDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs VRSN Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, VRSN has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while VRSN trades at $269.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas VRSN's P/E ratio is 32.94. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VRSN's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to VRSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs TOST Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TOST has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while TOST trades at $42.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas TOST's P/E ratio is 155.96. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TOST's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to TOST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs CHKP Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CHKP has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while CHKP trades at $224.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas CHKP's P/E ratio is 29.63. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHKP's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to CHKP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs CPAY Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CPAY has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while CPAY trades at $328.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas CPAY's P/E ratio is 23.09. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CPAY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to CPAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs FLT Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, FLT has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while FLT trades at $303.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas FLT's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FLT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to FLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs NTNX Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NTNX has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while NTNX trades at $78.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas NTNX's P/E ratio is -303.35. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NTNX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to NTNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs CYBR Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CYBR has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while CYBR trades at $381.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas CYBR's P/E ratio is -188.71. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CYBR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to CYBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs RBRK Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, RBRK has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while RBRK trades at $94.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas RBRK's P/E ratio is -12.58. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RBRK's ROE of +2.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to RBRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs OKTA Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, OKTA has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while OKTA trades at $105.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas OKTA's P/E ratio is 1754.08. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OKTA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to OKTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs GEN Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, GEN has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while GEN trades at $28.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas GEN's P/E ratio is 27.24. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GEN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to GEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs AFRM Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, AFRM has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while AFRM trades at $50.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas AFRM's P/E ratio is -266.74. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AFRM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to AFRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs FFIV Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, FFIV has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while FFIV trades at $283.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas FFIV's P/E ratio is 26.50. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FFIV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to FFIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs KSPI Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, KSPI has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while KSPI trades at $81.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas KSPI's P/E ratio is 7.52. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KSPI's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to KSPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs MDB Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, MDB has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while MDB trades at $188.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas MDB's P/E ratio is -108.30. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MDB's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to MDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs NLOK Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NLOK has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while NLOK trades at $21.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas NLOK's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NLOK's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to NLOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs AKAM Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, AKAM has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while AKAM trades at $76.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas AKAM's P/E ratio is 25.65. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AKAM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to AKAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs DOX Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, DOX has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while DOX trades at $91.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas DOX's P/E ratio is 19.18. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DOX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to DOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs SAIL Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SAIL has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while SAIL trades at $17.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas SAIL's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SAIL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to SAIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs ALTR Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ALTR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while ALTR trades at $111.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas ALTR's P/E ratio is 699.06. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ALTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is more volatile compared to ALTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs PLAN Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PLAN has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while PLAN trades at $63.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas PLAN's P/E ratio is -44.82. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PLAN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to PLAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs KVYO Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, KVYO has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while KVYO trades at $33.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas KVYO's P/E ratio is -197.88. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KVYO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to KVYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs WIX Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, WIX has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while WIX trades at $152.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas WIX's P/E ratio is 60.19. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WIX's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to WIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs INFA Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, INFA has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while INFA trades at $24.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas INFA's P/E ratio is 810.00. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to INFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to INFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs DBX Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, DBX has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while DBX trades at $28.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas DBX's P/E ratio is 18.86. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DBX's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to DBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs CFLT Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CFLT has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while CFLT trades at $22.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas CFLT's P/E ratio is -23.34. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CFLT's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to CFLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs HCP Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, HCP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while HCP trades at $34.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas HCP's P/E ratio is -57.97. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HCP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to HCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs PATH Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PATH has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while PATH trades at $12.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas PATH's P/E ratio is -99.77. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PATH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to PATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs JCOM Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, JCOM has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while JCOM trades at $142.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas JCOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JCOM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to JCOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs SQSP Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SQSP has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while SQSP trades at $46.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas SQSP's P/E ratio is -1164.25. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SQSP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to SQSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs S Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, S has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while S trades at $19.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas S's P/E ratio is -21.40. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to S's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to S. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs NEWR Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NEWR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while NEWR trades at $86.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas NEWR's P/E ratio is -41.62. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NEWR's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI and NEWR have similar daily volatility (0.05).
SWI vs FOUR Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, FOUR has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while FOUR trades at $90.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas FOUR's P/E ratio is 30.46. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FOUR's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to FOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs CCCS Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CCCS has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while CCCS trades at $8.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas CCCS's P/E ratio is 868.00. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CCCS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to CCCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs SPSC Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SPSC has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while SPSC trades at $142.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas SPSC's P/E ratio is 66.71. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SPSC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to SPSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs BOX Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while BOX trades at $36.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 27.10. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BOX's ROE of +2.72%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to BOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs VRNS Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, VRNS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while VRNS trades at $47.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas VRNS's P/E ratio is -58.26. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VRNS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to VRNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs QLYS Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, QLYS has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while QLYS trades at $136.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas QLYS's P/E ratio is 27.80. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to QLYS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to QLYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs ACIW Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ACIW has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while ACIW trades at $46.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas ACIW's P/E ratio is 18.29. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ACIW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to ACIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs NVEI Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NVEI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while NVEI trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas NVEI's P/E ratio is 212.44. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NVEI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is more volatile compared to NVEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs WEX Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, WEX has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while WEX trades at $136.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas WEX's P/E ratio is 17.60. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WEX's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to WEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs EEFT Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, EEFT has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while EEFT trades at $107.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas EEFT's P/E ratio is 15.90. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EEFT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to EEFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs RELY Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, RELY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while RELY trades at $21.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas RELY's P/E ratio is -717.33. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RELY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to RELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs CLBT Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CLBT has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while CLBT trades at $16.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas CLBT's P/E ratio is -18.45. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CLBT's ROE of -1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to CLBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs ODD Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ODD has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while ODD trades at $72.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas ODD's P/E ratio is 41.51. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ODD's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to ODD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs TENB Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TENB has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while TENB trades at $32.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas TENB's P/E ratio is -84.22. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TENB's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to TENB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs ESMT Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ESMT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while ESMT trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas ESMT's P/E ratio is 153.67. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ESMT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to ESMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs AVPT Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, AVPT has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while AVPT trades at $18.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas AVPT's P/E ratio is -143.00. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AVPT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to AVPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs STNE Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, STNE has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while STNE trades at $13.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas STNE's P/E ratio is -17.10. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to STNE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to STNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs CORZZ Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CORZZ has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while CORZZ trades at $10.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas CORZZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CORZZ's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to CORZZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs CORZ Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CORZ has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while CORZ trades at $10.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas CORZ's P/E ratio is -2.75. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CORZ's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to CORZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs DLO Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, DLO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while DLO trades at $11.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas DLO's P/E ratio is 23.02. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DLO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to DLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs EVOP Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, EVOP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while EVOP trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas EVOP's P/E ratio is -309.00. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EVOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to EVOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs PAGS Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PAGS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while PAGS trades at $8.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas PAGS's P/E ratio is 7.17. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PAGS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to PAGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs DOCN Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, DOCN has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while DOCN trades at $28.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas DOCN's P/E ratio is 24.96. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DOCN's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to DOCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs MQ Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, MQ has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while MQ trades at $5.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas MQ's P/E ratio is 52.70. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MQ's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to MQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs PAYO Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PAYO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while PAYO trades at $6.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas PAYO's P/E ratio is 24.34. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PAYO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to PAYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs BB Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, BB has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while BB trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas BB's P/E ratio is -409.00. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BB's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to BB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs EVTC Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, EVTC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while EVTC trades at $36.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas EVTC's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EVTC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to EVTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs APPN Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, APPN has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while APPN trades at $31.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas APPN's P/E ratio is -37.63. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to APPN's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to APPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs RAMP Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, RAMP has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while RAMP trades at $32.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas RAMP's P/E ratio is -819.25. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RAMP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to RAMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs TDC Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TDC has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while TDC trades at $21.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas TDC's P/E ratio is 15.06. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TDC's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to TDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs GETVV Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, GETVV has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while GETVV trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas GETVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GETVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to GETVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs FIVN Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, FIVN has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while FIVN trades at $27.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas FIVN's P/E ratio is -451.83. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FIVN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to FIVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs AVDX Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, AVDX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while AVDX trades at $9.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas AVDX's P/E ratio is 244.75. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AVDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to AVDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs FORG Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, FORG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while FORG trades at $23.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas FORG's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FORG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to FORG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs CSGS Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CSGS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while CSGS trades at $65.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas CSGS's P/E ratio is 22.53. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CSGS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to CSGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs GSKY Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, GSKY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while GSKY trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas GSKY's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GSKY's ROE of +5.47%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to GSKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs EVCM Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, EVCM has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while EVCM trades at $10.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas EVCM's P/E ratio is -83.83. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EVCM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to EVCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs GET Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, GET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while GET trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas GET's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to GET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs NTCT Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NTCT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while NTCT trades at $23.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas NTCT's P/E ratio is -4.56. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NTCT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to NTCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs STER Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, STER has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while STER trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas STER's P/E ratio is -98.47. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to STER's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to STER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs CORZW Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CORZW has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while CORZW trades at $5.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas CORZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CORZW's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to CORZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs ZUO Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ZUO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while ZUO trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas ZUO's P/E ratio is -19.65. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ZUO's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to ZUO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs SUMO Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SUMO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while SUMO trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas SUMO's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SUMO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to SUMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs AVPTW Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, AVPTW has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while AVPTW trades at $7.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas AVPTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AVPTW's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to AVPTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs GB Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, GB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while GB trades at $7.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas GB's P/E ratio is 25.66. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GB's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to GB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs RPD Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, RPD has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while RPD trades at $22.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas RPD's P/E ratio is 54.56. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RPD's ROE of +9.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to RPD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs TUYA Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TUYA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while TUYA trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas TUYA's P/E ratio is 63.75. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TUYA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to TUYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs PGY Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PGY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while PGY trades at $17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas PGY's P/E ratio is -3.27. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PGY's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to PGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.
SWI vs PAYA Comparison
SWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWI stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PAYA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWI is priced at $18.49, while PAYA trades at $9.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWI currently has a P/E ratio of 28.89, whereas PAYA's P/E ratio is 139.14. In terms of profitability, SWI's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PAYA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SWI is less volatile compared to PAYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWI.