Smartsheet Inc.
Smartsheet Inc. (SMAR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SMAR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMAR | $56.47 | +0.02% | 7.9B | -806.71 | -$0.07 | N/A |
| SAP | $278.91 | +0.00% | 323.9B | 42.73 | $6.50 | +0.95% |
| CRM | $233.37 | +0.00% | 231.8B | 37.89 | $6.40 | +0.67% |
| INTU | $710.64 | +0.00% | 199.9B | 58.65 | $12.22 | +0.58% |
| UBER | $91.40 | +0.00% | 193.2B | 15.78 | $5.87 | N/A |
| SHOP | $144.27 | +0.00% | 183.9B | 78.59 | $1.80 | N/A |
| NOW | $850.86 | +0.00% | 180.4B | 109.25 | $7.94 | N/A |
| APP | $433.34 | +0.00% | 148.4B | 60.26 | $7.28 | N/A |
| MSTR | $372.94 | +0.00% | 103.9B | 25.71 | $14.25 | N/A |
| CDNS | $348.92 | +0.00% | 95.3B | 94.56 | $3.70 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SMAR vs SAP Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 323.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while SAP trades at $278.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 42.73. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check SAP's competition here
SMAR vs CRM Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 231.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while CRM trades at $233.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 37.89. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check CRM's competition here
SMAR vs INTU Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 199.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while INTU trades at $710.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 58.65. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check INTU's competition here
SMAR vs UBER Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 193.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while UBER trades at $91.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 15.78. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check UBER's competition here
SMAR vs SHOP Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 183.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while SHOP trades at $144.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 78.59. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check SHOP's competition here
SMAR vs NOW Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 180.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while NOW trades at $850.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 109.25. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check NOW's competition here
SMAR vs APP Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 148.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while APP trades at $433.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 60.26. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check APP's competition here
SMAR vs MSTR Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 103.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while MSTR trades at $372.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is 25.71. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MSTR's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check MSTR's competition here
SMAR vs CDNS Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 95.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while CDNS trades at $348.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 94.56. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check CDNS's competition here
SMAR vs SNOW Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 66.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while SNOW trades at $194.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is -47.52. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check SNOW's competition here
SMAR vs ADSK Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 61.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while ADSK trades at $283.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 61.66. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check ADSK's competition here
SMAR vs WDAY Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 60.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while WDAY trades at $221.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 125.61. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check WDAY's competition here
SMAR vs DDOG Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 44.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while DDOG trades at $124.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 353.47. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check DDOG's competition here
SMAR vs TEAM Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 43.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while TEAM trades at $164.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is -170.42. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check TEAM's competition here
SMAR vs ANSS Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while ANSS trades at $374.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 55.53. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check ANSS's competition here
SMAR vs STRF Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 32.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while STRF trades at $116.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STRF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check STRF's competition here
SMAR vs FICO Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 32.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while FICO trades at $1,318.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 52.53. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check FICO's competition here
SMAR vs STRK Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while STRK trades at $104.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STRK's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check STRK's competition here
SMAR vs TTD Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, TTD has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while TTD trades at $50.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas TTD's P/E ratio is 62.80. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TTD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to TTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check TTD's competition here
SMAR vs TYL Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while TYL trades at $573.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 81.84. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check TYL's competition here
SMAR vs PTC Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while PTC trades at $208.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 48.55. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check PTC's competition here
SMAR vs HUBS Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while HUBS trades at $429.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is -2092.71. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HUBS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check HUBS's competition here
SMAR vs ZM Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while ZM trades at $71.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 21.96. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check ZM's competition here
SMAR vs SSNC Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while SSNC trades at $87.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 27.39. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check SSNC's competition here
SMAR vs GRAB Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while GRAB trades at $5.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 256.50. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check GRAB's competition here
SMAR vs GWRE Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while GWRE trades at $208.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 503.69. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check GWRE's competition here
SMAR vs AZPN Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while AZPN trades at $264.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AZPN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check AZPN's competition here
SMAR vs U Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, U has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while U trades at $38.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas U's P/E ratio is -35.87. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to U's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check U's competition here
SMAR vs BSY Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while BSY trades at $51.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 68.13. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check BSY's competition here
SMAR vs DUOL Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while DUOL trades at $329.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 133.99. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check DUOL's competition here
SMAR vs DT Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while DT trades at $47.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 29.80. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check DT's competition here
SMAR vs DOCU Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while DOCU trades at $69.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 13.48. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check DOCU's competition here
SMAR vs QXO Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, QXO has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while QXO trades at $21.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas QXO's P/E ratio is -58.59. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QXO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to QXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check QXO's competition here
SMAR vs MANH Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while MANH trades at $215.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 60.17. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check MANH's competition here
SMAR vs PAYC Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while PAYC trades at $216.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 29.28. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check PAYC's competition here
SMAR vs BKI Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while BKI trades at $75.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check BKI's competition here
SMAR vs XM Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while XM trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check XM's competition here
SMAR vs CDAY Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while CDAY trades at $69.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CDAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check CDAY's competition here
SMAR vs PCOR Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while PCOR trades at $64.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is -68.01. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check PCOR's competition here
SMAR vs APPF Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while APPF trades at $265.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 47.89. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check APPF's competition here
SMAR vs PCTY Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while PCTY trades at $171.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 42.78. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check PCTY's competition here
SMAR vs TTAN Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while TTAN trades at $101.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is -27.88. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check TTAN's competition here
SMAR vs SRAD Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while SRAD trades at $31.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 77.50. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check SRAD's competition here
SMAR vs PEGA Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while PEGA trades at $51.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 43.52. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check PEGA's competition here
SMAR vs MNDY Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while MNDY trades at $176.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 231.24. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check MNDY's competition here
SMAR vs DAY Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while DAY trades at $53.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is 176.30. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DAY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check DAY's competition here
SMAR vs DSGX Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while DSGX trades at $97.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 59.53. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check DSGX's competition here
SMAR vs NICE Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while NICE trades at $127.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 15.91. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check NICE's competition here
SMAR vs ESTC Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while ESTC trades at $76.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is -74.31. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ESTC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check ESTC's competition here
SMAR vs OTEX Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while OTEX trades at $31.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 19.19. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check OTEX's competition here
SMAR vs CVLT Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while CVLT trades at $183.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 100.01. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check CVLT's competition here
SMAR vs NATI Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while NATI trades at $59.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check NATI's competition here
SMAR vs BULL Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while BULL trades at $15.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is 12.91. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BULL's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check BULL's competition here
SMAR vs GTLB Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while GTLB trades at $40.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is 492.00. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GTLB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check GTLB's competition here
SMAR vs SOUNW Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, SOUNW has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while SOUNW trades at $7.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas SOUNW's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SOUNW's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to SOUNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check SOUNW's competition here
SMAR vs IDCC Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while IDCC trades at $269.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 19.09. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check IDCC's competition here
SMAR vs LIF Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while LIF trades at $85.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 224.82. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check LIF's competition here
SMAR vs SOUN Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, SOUN has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while SOUN trades at $16.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas SOUN's P/E ratio is -22.93. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SOUN's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to SOUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check SOUN's competition here
SMAR vs LYFT Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while LYFT trades at $14.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 68.78. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check LYFT's competition here
SMAR vs COUP Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while COUP trades at $80.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check COUP's competition here
SMAR vs CWAN Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while CWAN trades at $19.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CWAN's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check CWAN's competition here
SMAR vs FROG Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while FROG trades at $42.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is -58.58. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check FROG's competition here
SMAR vs QTWO Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while QTWO trades at $74.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is 1242.17. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QTWO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check QTWO's competition here
SMAR vs COMP Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while COMP trades at $8.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is -87.80. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to COMP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check COMP's competition here
SMAR vs ZETA Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while ZETA trades at $17.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is -127.43. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check ZETA's competition here
SMAR vs CVT Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while CVT trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check CVT's competition here
SMAR vs RIOT Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, RIOT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while RIOT trades at $12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas RIOT's P/E ratio is -28.32. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RIOT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to RIOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check RIOT's competition here
SMAR vs WK Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while WK trades at $72.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas WK's P/E ratio is -62.82. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WK's ROE of +1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to WK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check WK's competition here
SMAR vs BILL Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while BILL trades at $39.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is -2022.00. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check BILL's competition here
SMAR vs PYCR Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while PYCR trades at $22.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check PYCR's competition here
SMAR vs VERX Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, VERX has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while VERX trades at $25.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas VERX's P/E ratio is -77.67. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VERX's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to VERX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check VERX's competition here
SMAR vs FRSH Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, FRSH has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while FRSH trades at $12.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas FRSH's P/E ratio is -72.67. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FRSH's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to FRSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check FRSH's competition here
SMAR vs PWSC Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while PWSC trades at $22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check PWSC's competition here
SMAR vs GBTG Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while GBTG trades at $7.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is -65.12. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBTG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check GBTG's competition here
SMAR vs CALX Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, CALX has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while CALX trades at $56.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas CALX's P/E ratio is -138.89. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CALX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to CALX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check CALX's competition here
SMAR vs AYX Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while AYX trades at $48.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check AYX's competition here
SMAR vs ENV Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while ENV trades at $63.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check ENV's competition here
SMAR vs INST Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while INST trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check INST's competition here
SMAR vs RUM Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while RUM trades at $8.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -5.49. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RUM's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to RUM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check RUM's competition here
SMAR vs ZI Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while ZI trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 116.88. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check ZI's competition here
SMAR vs INTA Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, INTA has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while INTA trades at $41.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas INTA's P/E ratio is -183.13. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INTA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to INTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check INTA's competition here
SMAR vs ASAN Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, ASAN has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while ASAN trades at $13.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas ASAN's P/E ratio is -13.86. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ASAN's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to ASAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check ASAN's competition here
SMAR vs NCNO Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, NCNO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while NCNO trades at $27.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas NCNO's P/E ratio is -111.00. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NCNO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to NCNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check NCNO's competition here
SMAR vs YOU Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, YOU has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while YOU trades at $33.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas YOU's P/E ratio is 20.58. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to YOU's ROE of +1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to YOU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check YOU's competition here
SMAR vs GRND Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, GRND has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while GRND trades at $16.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas GRND's P/E ratio is -42.45. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GRND's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to GRND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check GRND's competition here
SMAR vs RUMBW Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, RUMBW has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while RUMBW trades at $2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas RUMBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RUMBW's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to RUMBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check RUMBW's competition here
SMAR vs BL Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, BL has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while BL trades at $50.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas BL's P/E ratio is 39.40. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to BL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check BL's competition here
SMAR vs BLKB Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, BLKB has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while BLKB trades at $62.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas BLKB's P/E ratio is -11.53. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BLKB's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to BLKB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check BLKB's competition here
SMAR vs AGYS Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, AGYS has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while AGYS trades at $106.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas AGYS's P/E ratio is 215.98. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGYS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to AGYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check AGYS's competition here
SMAR vs NATL Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, NATL has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while NATL trades at $38.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas NATL's P/E ratio is 22.56. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NATL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to NATL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check NATL's competition here
SMAR vs BRZE Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, BRZE has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while BRZE trades at $24.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas BRZE's P/E ratio is -25.25. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BRZE's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to BRZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check BRZE's competition here
SMAR vs ALRM Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, ALRM has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while ALRM trades at $56.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas ALRM's P/E ratio is 23.44. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ALRM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to ALRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check ALRM's competition here
SMAR vs RNG Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, RNG has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while RNG trades at $30.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas RNG's P/E ratio is -236.50. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RNG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to RNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check RNG's competition here
SMAR vs CLSK Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, CLSK has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while CLSK trades at $9.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas CLSK's P/E ratio is 11.34. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CLSK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to CLSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check CLSK's competition here
SMAR vs DAVE Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while DAVE trades at $201.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 53.28. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check DAVE's competition here
SMAR vs BTDR Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, BTDR has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while BTDR trades at $13.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas BTDR's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BTDR's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to BTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check BTDR's competition here
SMAR vs DV Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, DV has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while DV trades at $15.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas DV's P/E ratio is 51.06. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to DV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check DV's competition here
SMAR vs DAVEW Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, DAVEW has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while DAVEW trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas DAVEW's P/E ratio is -6.56. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DAVEW's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR is less volatile compared to DAVEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMAR.Check DAVEW's competition here
SMAR vs DCT Comparison August 2025
SMAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMAR stands at 7.9B. In comparison, DCT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMAR is priced at $56.47, while DCT trades at $18.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMAR currently has a P/E ratio of -806.71, whereas DCT's P/E ratio is -172.64. In terms of profitability, SMAR's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DCT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMAR and DCT have similar daily volatility (0.05).Check DCT's competition here