Shopify Inc.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, SAPGF has a market cap of 343.56B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while SAPGF trades at $294.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas SAPGF's P/E ratio is 53.35. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SAPGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to SAPGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 342.97B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while SAP trades at $293.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 53.45. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 264.27B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while CRM trades at $275.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 43.24. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 202.91B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while NOW trades at $980.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 133.01. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 182.80B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while INTU trades at $653.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 61.05. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 173.09B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while UBER trades at $82.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 113.74B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while MSTR trades at $416.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -18.70. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 110.82B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while APP trades at $328.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 72.69. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to APP's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 83.49B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while CDNS trades at $305.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 77.41. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, CNSWF has a market cap of 77.74B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while CNSWF trades at $3,668.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas CNSWF's P/E ratio is 106.42. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CNSWF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to CNSWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 69.34B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while WDAY trades at $259.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 132.91. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 61.23B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while ADSK trades at $287.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 56.04. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, NEMKY has a market cap of 59.19B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while NEMKY trades at $20.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas NEMKY's P/E ratio is 58.57. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NEMKY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to NEMKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 58.18B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while SNOW trades at $174.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is -45.23. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 54.63B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while TEAM trades at $207.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is -125.77. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, INVUP has a market cap of 51.45B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while INVUP trades at $27.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas INVUP's P/E ratio is -1834.00. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to INVUP's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to INVUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 50.89B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while FICO trades at $2,090.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 89.92. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, DASTF has a market cap of 49.88B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while DASTF trades at $37.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas DASTF's P/E ratio is 37.60. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DASTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to DASTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, DASTY has a market cap of 49.70B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while DASTY trades at $37.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas DASTY's P/E ratio is 37.46. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DASTY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to DASTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 37.24B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while DDOG trades at $107.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 229.53. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, TTD has a market cap of 35.30B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while TTD trades at $71.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas TTD's P/E ratio is 91.08. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TTD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to TTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 31.67B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while HUBS trades at $601.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is 10029.00. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HUBS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 29.34B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while ANSS trades at $333.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 49.44. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 24.81B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while ZM trades at $81.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 25.33. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 24.18B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while TYL trades at $560.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 84.43. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 23.51B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while STRK trades at $92.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to STRK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 23.31B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while DUOL trades at $512.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 252.59. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 22.86B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while STRF trades at $93.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to STRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, WIGBY has a market cap of 20.24B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while WIGBY trades at $61.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas WIGBY's P/E ratio is 101.67. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WIGBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to WIGBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 19.55B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while PTC trades at $163.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 44.79. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 19.38B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while GRAB trades at $4.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 490.00. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 19.15B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while SSNC trades at $77.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 24.11. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, DIDIY has a market cap of 19.15B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while DIDIY trades at $4.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas DIDIY's P/E ratio is 146.67. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DIDIY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to DIDIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, WTCHF has a market cap of 18.59B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while WTCHF trades at $56.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas WTCHF's P/E ratio is 91.85. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WTCHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to WTCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 17.92B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while GWRE trades at $213.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is -1124.42. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GWRE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, XROLF has a market cap of 16.89B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while XROLF trades at $110.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas XROLF's P/E ratio is 132.53. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to XROLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to XROLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 16.87B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while DOCU trades at $83.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.73B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while AZPN trades at $264.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AZPN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, SGGEF has a market cap of 16.35B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while SGGEF trades at $16.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas SGGEF's P/E ratio is 40.00. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SGGEF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to SGGEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, SGPYY has a market cap of 16.11B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while SGPYY trades at $65.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas SGPYY's P/E ratio is 40.96. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SGPYY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to SGPYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 14.60B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while PAYC trades at $252.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 28.30. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 14.56B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while DT trades at $48.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 30.40. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, NEMTF has a market cap of 14.44B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while NEMTF trades at $125.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas NEMTF's P/E ratio is 71.85. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NEMTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to NEMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 14.13B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while MNDY trades at $278.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 456.13. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 13.57B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while BSY trades at $46.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 59.73. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, OBIIF has a market cap of 12.80B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while OBIIF trades at $29.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas OBIIF's P/E ratio is 28.53. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OBIIF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to OBIIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, OCLCF has a market cap of 11.97B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while OCLCF trades at $93.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas OCLCF's P/E ratio is 28.59. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OCLCF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to OCLCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.88B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while BKI trades at $75.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 11.26B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while TTAN trades at $124.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is -14.56. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 11.19B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while MANH trades at $184.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 52.83. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11.01B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while XM trades at $18.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.85B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while CDAY trades at $69.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CDAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 10.75B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while PCTY trades at $194.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 48.65. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 10.40B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while NICE trades at $164.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 24.36. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 9.79B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while PCOR trades at $65.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is -76.33. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, NCSYF has a market cap of 9.66B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while NCSYF trades at $152.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas NCSYF's P/E ratio is 22.56. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NCSYF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to NCSYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 9.18B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while DSGX trades at $107.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 65.52. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 9.06B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while DAY trades at $56.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is 515.23. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 8.93B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while ESTC trades at $85.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is -65.32. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ESTC's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, U has a market cap of 8.55B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while U trades at $20.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas U's P/E ratio is -12.24. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to U's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 8.12B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while GTLB trades at $49.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is -1229.00. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GTLB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 7.97B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while NATI trades at $59.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 7.97B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while PEGA trades at $93.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 43.09. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.91B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while SMAR trades at $56.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 7.72B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while APPF trades at $214.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 39.98. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 7.57B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while BULL trades at $16.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is -14.52. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BULL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 7.53B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while CVLT trades at $170.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 101.55. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 7.17B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while SRAD trades at $23.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 209.73. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 7.03B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while OTEX trades at $27.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 11.12. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 6.86B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while LYFT trades at $16.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 277.50. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 6.68B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while CWAN trades at $23.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CWAN's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, ALMFF has a market cap of 6.33B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while ALMFF trades at $48.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas ALMFF's P/E ratio is 92.31. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ALMFF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to ALMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, ETWO-WT has a market cap of 6.22B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while ETWO-WT trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas ETWO-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ETWO-WT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to ETWO-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, QXO has a market cap of 6.21B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while QXO trades at $13.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas QXO's P/E ratio is -126.27. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to QXO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to QXO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.12B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while COUP trades at $80.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to COUP's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, VERX has a market cap of 6.07B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while VERX trades at $38.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas VERX's P/E ratio is -112.74. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VERX's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to VERX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, THNOF has a market cap of 5.89B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while THNOF trades at $18.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas THNOF's P/E ratio is 78.26. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to THNOF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to THNOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, KGDEY has a market cap of 5.78B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while KGDEY trades at $162.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas KGDEY's P/E ratio is -296.00. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KGDEY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to KGDEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 5.58B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while QTWO trades at $89.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is -139.92. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to QTWO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 5.50B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while IDCC trades at $211.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 16.76. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, HOILF has a market cap of 5.40B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while HOILF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas HOILF's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HOILF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to HOILF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, TMNSF has a market cap of 5.27B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while TMNSF trades at $74.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas TMNSF's P/E ratio is 31.17. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TMNSF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to TMNSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, TMSNY has a market cap of 5.25B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while TMSNY trades at $74.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas TMSNY's P/E ratio is 31.06. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TMSNY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to TMSNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, SYT has a market cap of 5.19B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while SYT trades at $1.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas SYT's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SYT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to SYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, FNOXF has a market cap of 5.15B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while FNOXF trades at $8.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas FNOXF's P/E ratio is 65.00. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FNOXF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to FNOXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, GRND has a market cap of 4.69B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while GRND trades at $23.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas GRND's P/E ratio is -32.38. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GRND's ROE of +2.51%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to GRND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 4.55B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while BILL trades at $44.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is 114.51. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 4.47B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while FROG trades at $39.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is -61.90. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, INTA has a market cap of 4.36B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while INTA trades at $53.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas INTA's P/E ratio is -224.58. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to INTA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to INTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, RUMBW has a market cap of 4.30B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while RUMBW trades at $3.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas RUMBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RUMBW's ROE of -2.67%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to RUMBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, FRSH has a market cap of 4.30B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while FRSH trades at $14.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas FRSH's P/E ratio is -60.67. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FRSH's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to FRSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, SMCYY has a market cap of 4.20B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while SMCYY trades at $10.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas SMCYY's P/E ratio is 39.44. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SMCYY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to SMCYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.19B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while CVT trades at $8.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.09B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while PYCR trades at $22.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, ASAN has a market cap of 4.08B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while ASAN trades at $17.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas ASAN's P/E ratio is -15.60. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ASAN's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to ASAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, SICRF has a market cap of 4.06B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while SICRF trades at $103.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas SICRF's P/E ratio is 37.59. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SICRF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to SICRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 4.04B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while RUM trades at $9.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -5.60. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RUM's ROE of -2.67%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to RUM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, TMVWY has a market cap of 3.86B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while TMVWY trades at $6.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas TMVWY's P/E ratio is 13.35. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TMVWY's ROE of +1.79%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to TMVWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, KXSCF has a market cap of 3.81B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while KXSCF trades at $135.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas KXSCF's P/E ratio is 190.83. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KXSCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to KXSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.80B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while PWSC trades at $22.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 3.77B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while WK trades at $67.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas WK's P/E ratio is -58.28. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WK's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to WK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, SOUN has a market cap of 3.60B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while SOUN trades at $8.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas SOUN's P/E ratio is -8.63. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SOUN's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to SOUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.53B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while AYX trades at $48.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, BRZE has a market cap of 3.52B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while BRZE trades at $33.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas BRZE's P/E ratio is -33.02. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BRZE's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to BRZE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.49B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while ENV trades at $63.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 3.49B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while LIF trades at $45.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is -762.00. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LIF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.46B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while INST trades at $23.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, BL has a market cap of 3.36B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while BL trades at $53.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas BL's P/E ratio is 38.57. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BL's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to BL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, LIFX has a market cap of 3.33B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while LIFX trades at $14.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas LIFX's P/E ratio is -734.50. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LIFX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to LIFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 3.18B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while COMP trades at $6.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is -20.16. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to COMP's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.16B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while ZI trades at $9.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 116.88. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 3.14B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while ZETA trades at $13.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is -53.36. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, BLKB has a market cap of 3.08B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while BLKB trades at $63.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas BLKB's P/E ratio is -11.32. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BLKB's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to BLKB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, ALKT has a market cap of 3.03B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while ALKT trades at $29.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas ALKT's P/E ratio is -79.49. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ALKT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to ALKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, RIOT has a market cap of 3.03B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while RIOT trades at $8.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas RIOT's P/E ratio is -6.19. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RIOT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to RIOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, ALIT has a market cap of 2.97B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while ALIT trades at $5.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas ALIT's P/E ratio is -22.30. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ALIT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to ALIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, ASOZY has a market cap of 2.87B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while ASOZY trades at $42.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas ASOZY's P/E ratio is 20.81. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ASOZY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to ASOZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, ASOZF has a market cap of 2.83B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while ASOZF trades at $41.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas ASOZF's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ASOZF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to ASOZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, CALX has a market cap of 2.80B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while CALX trades at $43.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas CALX's P/E ratio is -83.02. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CALX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to CALX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 2.79B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while GBTG trades at $5.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is -19.45. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GBTG's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, ALRM has a market cap of 2.79B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while ALRM trades at $56.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas ALRM's P/E ratio is 24.47. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ALRM's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to ALRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, NCNO has a market cap of 2.77B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while NCNO trades at $24.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas NCNO's P/E ratio is -72.82. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NCNO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to NCNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, BTDR has a market cap of 2.72B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while BTDR trades at $14.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas BTDR's P/E ratio is -3.24. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BTDR's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to BTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, PAR has a market cap of 2.62B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while PAR trades at $64.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas PAR's P/E ratio is -24.62. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PAR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to PAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, PRGS has a market cap of 2.62B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while PRGS trades at $60.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas PRGS's P/E ratio is 47.95. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PRGS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to PRGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, CLSK has a market cap of 2.58B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while CLSK trades at $9.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas CLSK's P/E ratio is -13.33. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CLSK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to CLSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, DCT has a market cap of 2.52B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while DCT trades at $18.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas DCT's P/E ratio is -172.64. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DCT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to DCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, RNG has a market cap of 2.52B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while RNG trades at $27.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas RNG's P/E ratio is -44.03. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RNG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to RNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, DAVEW has a market cap of 2.35B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while DAVEW trades at $0.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas DAVEW's P/E ratio is -2.79. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DAVEW's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to DAVEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, AGYS has a market cap of 2.26B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while AGYS trades at $80.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas AGYS's P/E ratio is 107.96. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AGYS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to AGYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, SRBEF has a market cap of 2.25B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while SRBEF trades at $140.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas SRBEF's P/E ratio is -49.30. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SRBEF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to SRBEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 2.23B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while DAVE trades at $167.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 39.91. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, YOU has a market cap of 2.23B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while YOU trades at $24.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas YOU's P/E ratio is 15.44. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to YOU's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to YOU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, TMVWF has a market cap of 2.21B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while TMVWF trades at $14.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas TMVWF's P/E ratio is 15.39. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TMVWF's ROE of +1.79%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to TMVWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, QTGPF has a market cap of 2.18B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while QTGPF trades at $86.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas QTGPF's P/E ratio is 35.25. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to QTGPF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to QTGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, DV has a market cap of 2.17B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while DV trades at $13.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas DV's P/E ratio is 41.69. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to DV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, CXM has a market cap of 2.07B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while CXM trades at $8.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas CXM's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CXM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to CXM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, NATL has a market cap of 1.96B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while NATL trades at $26.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas NATL's P/E ratio is 21.74. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NATL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to NATL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, UBMRF has a market cap of 1.89B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while UBMRF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas UBMRF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to UBMRF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to UBMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, KHOTF has a market cap of 1.77B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while KHOTF trades at $3.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas KHOTF's P/E ratio is 360.00. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KHOTF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to KHOTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, MTTR has a market cap of 1.76B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while MTTR trades at $5.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas MTTR's P/E ratio is -6.72. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MTTR's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to MTTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, NUKKW has a market cap of 1.74B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while NUKKW trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas NUKKW's P/E ratio is -7.94. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NUKKW's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to NUKKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, DBD has a market cap of 1.72B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while DBD trades at $46.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas DBD's P/E ratio is -171.26. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DBD's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to DBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, PLUS has a market cap of 1.70B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while PLUS trades at $63.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas PLUS's P/E ratio is 16.33. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PLUS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to PLUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, ESKEF has a market cap of 1.67B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while ESKEF trades at $280.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas ESKEF's P/E ratio is 97.01. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ESKEF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to ESKEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, FREKF has a market cap of 1.64B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while FREKF trades at $27.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas FREKF's P/E ratio is -75.03. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FREKF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to FREKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, SPNS has a market cap of 1.59B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while SPNS trades at $28.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas SPNS's P/E ratio is 22.01. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SPNS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to SPNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, IPEU has a market cap of 1.56B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while IPEU trades at $6.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas IPEU's P/E ratio is 0.92. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IPEU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to IPEU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, SEMR has a market cap of 1.54B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while SEMR trades at $10.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas SEMR's P/E ratio is 173.00. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SEMR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to SEMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, LSPD has a market cap of 1.52B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while LSPD trades at $9.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas LSPD's P/E ratio is -12.40. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LSPD's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to LSPD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, DGNX has a market cap of 1.51B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while DGNX trades at $65.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas DGNX's P/E ratio is -218.77. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DGNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to DGNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, SOUNW has a market cap of 1.51B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while SOUNW trades at $4.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas SOUNW's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SOUNW's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to SOUNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, JAMF has a market cap of 1.47B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while JAMF trades at $11.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas JAMF's P/E ratio is -30.14. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to JAMF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to JAMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, EVBG has a market cap of 1.46B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while EVBG trades at $35.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas EVBG's P/E ratio is -24.31. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EVBG's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to EVBG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, OLO has a market cap of 1.45B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while OLO trades at $8.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas OLO's P/E ratio is -865.00. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OLO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to OLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, ADEA has a market cap of 1.45B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while ADEA trades at $13.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas ADEA's P/E ratio is 20.21. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ADEA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to ADEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, PD has a market cap of 1.44B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while PD trades at $15.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas PD's P/E ratio is -26.88. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PD's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, WEMXF has a market cap of 1.44B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while WEMXF trades at $0.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas WEMXF's P/E ratio is -5.01. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WEMXF's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to WEMXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, MNTV has a market cap of 1.42B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while MNTV trades at $9.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas MNTV's P/E ratio is -18.17. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MNTV's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to MNTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, TMOAY has a market cap of 1.42B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while TMOAY trades at $2.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas TMOAY's P/E ratio is -36.12. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TMOAY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to TMOAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, KARO has a market cap of 1.40B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while KARO trades at $45.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas KARO's P/E ratio is 28.97. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KARO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to KARO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, SPT has a market cap of 1.39B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while SPT trades at $23.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas SPT's P/E ratio is -21.96. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SPT's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to SPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, AMPL has a market cap of 1.39B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while AMPL trades at $10.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas AMPL's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AMPL's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to AMPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, UPBD has a market cap of 1.37B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while UPBD trades at $23.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas UPBD's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to UPBD's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to UPBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, MAGTF has a market cap of 1.35B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while MAGTF trades at $31.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas MAGTF's P/E ratio is 354.22. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MAGTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to MAGTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, MLNK has a market cap of 1.34B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while MLNK trades at $17.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas MLNK's P/E ratio is -44.64. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MLNK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to MLNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, WKME has a market cap of 1.31B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while WKME trades at $13.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas WKME's P/E ratio is -27.92. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WKME's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to WKME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, IBTA has a market cap of 1.27B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while IBTA trades at $48.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas IBTA's P/E ratio is 18.86. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IBTA's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to IBTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, KNNNF has a market cap of 1.23B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while KNNNF trades at $10.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas KNNNF's P/E ratio is 18.18. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KNNNF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to KNNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, WBTN has a market cap of 1.19B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while WBTN trades at $9.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas WBTN's P/E ratio is -7.54. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WBTN's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to WBTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, MODN has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while MODN trades at $30.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas MODN's P/E ratio is 1500.00. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MODN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to MODN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, SWONF has a market cap of 1.14B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while SWONF trades at $7.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas SWONF's P/E ratio is -750.00. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SWONF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to SWONF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, YALA has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while YALA trades at $7.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas YALA's P/E ratio is 9.72. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to YALA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to YALA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, ZEUCF has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while ZEUCF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas ZEUCF's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ZEUCF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to ZEUCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, FSLY has a market cap of 1.11B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while FSLY trades at $7.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas FSLY's P/E ratio is -6.74. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FSLY's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to FSLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, VTEX has a market cap of 1.08B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while VTEX trades at $5.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas VTEX's P/E ratio is 98.75. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VTEX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to VTEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, GBGPF has a market cap of 1.05B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while GBGPF trades at $4.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas GBGPF's P/E ratio is 105.00. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GBGPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to GBGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, PRCH has a market cap of 1.05B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while PRCH trades at $10.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas PRCH's P/E ratio is -31.24. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PRCH's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to PRCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, NXTT has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while NXTT trades at $2.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas NXTT's P/E ratio is 0.64. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NXTT's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to NXTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, OPFI has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while OPFI trades at $11.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas OPFI's P/E ratio is 32.33. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OPFI's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to OPFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, LTTHF has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while LTTHF trades at $1.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas LTTHF's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LTTHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to LTTHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, HKD has a market cap of 1.02B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while HKD trades at $2.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas HKD's P/E ratio is 9.04. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HKD's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to HKD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, EGHSF has a market cap of 1.02B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while EGHSF trades at $18.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas EGHSF's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EGHSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to EGHSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, ENFN has a market cap of 1.02B. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while ENFN trades at $10.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas ENFN's P/E ratio is 358.67. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ENFN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to ENFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, VOBIF has a market cap of 979.12M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while VOBIF trades at $0.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas VOBIF's P/E ratio is 42.84. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VOBIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to VOBIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, ML has a market cap of 972.40M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while ML trades at $85.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas ML's P/E ratio is 113.03. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ML's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to ML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, ML-WT has a market cap of 954.47M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while ML-WT trades at $0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas ML-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ML-WT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to ML-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, ESIGF has a market cap of 952.30M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while ESIGF trades at $166.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas ESIGF's P/E ratio is -725.00. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ESIGF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to ESIGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, BLND has a market cap of 897.13M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while BLND trades at $3.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas BLND's P/E ratio is -14.67. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BLND's ROE of +4.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to BLND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, IE has a market cap of 885.70M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while IE trades at $6.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas IE's P/E ratio is -7.86. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IE's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to IE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, ETWO has a market cap of 815.74M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while ETWO trades at $2.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas ETWO's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ETWO's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to ETWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, PRO has a market cap of 809.19M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while PRO trades at $16.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas PRO's P/E ratio is -62.63. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PRO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to PRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, DCBO has a market cap of 804.81M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while DCBO trades at $26.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas DCBO's P/E ratio is 30.93. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DCBO's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to DCBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, WEAV has a market cap of 781.58M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while WEAV trades at $10.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas WEAV's P/E ratio is -24.85. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WEAV's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to WEAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, RSKD has a market cap of 779.32M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while RSKD trades at $4.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas RSKD's P/E ratio is -24.10. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RSKD's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to RSKD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, VMEO has a market cap of 766.06M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while VMEO trades at $4.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas VMEO's P/E ratio is 46.50. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VMEO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to VMEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, BTRCF has a market cap of 748.46M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while BTRCF trades at $12.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas BTRCF's P/E ratio is 20.13. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BTRCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to BTRCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, SLVFF has a market cap of 723.24M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while SLVFF trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas SLVFF's P/E ratio is 28.76. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SLVFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to SLVFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, PDFS has a market cap of 720.55M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while PDFS trades at $18.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas PDFS's P/E ratio is 184.10. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PDFS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to PDFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, BVSFF has a market cap of 699.35M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while BVSFF trades at $1.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas BVSFF's P/E ratio is 15.60. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BVSFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to BVSFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, TTMZF has a market cap of 649.53M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while TTMZF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas TTMZF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TTMZF's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to TTMZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, RDVT has a market cap of 637.92M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while RDVT trades at $45.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas RDVT's P/E ratio is 91.42. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RDVT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to RDVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, BCTCF has a market cap of 626.35M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while BCTCF trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas BCTCF's P/E ratio is 100.00. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BCTCF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to BCTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, ABST has a market cap of 610.81M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while ABST trades at $11.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas ABST's P/E ratio is -22.98. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ABST's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to ABST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, NPACF has a market cap of 610.51M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while NPACF trades at $18.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas NPACF's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NPACF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to NPACF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, YMM has a market cap of 601.13M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while YMM trades at $11.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas YMM's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to YMM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to YMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, BMBL has a market cap of 586.35M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while BMBL trades at $5.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas BMBL's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BMBL's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to BMBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, TMOAF has a market cap of 547.40M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while TMOAF trades at $4.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas TMOAF's P/E ratio is -27.81. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TMOAF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to TMOAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, DJCO has a market cap of 541.50M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while DJCO trades at $393.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas DJCO's P/E ratio is 7.08. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DJCO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to DJCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, PUBM has a market cap of 538.70M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while PUBM trades at $11.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas PUBM's P/E ratio is 48.22. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PUBM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to PUBM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, RWWI has a market cap of 529.10M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while RWWI trades at $15.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas RWWI's P/E ratio is 35.00. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RWWI's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to RWWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, NPACY has a market cap of 510.48M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while NPACY trades at $1.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas NPACY's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NPACY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to NPACY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, LGTY has a market cap of 507.45M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while LGTY trades at $14.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas LGTY's P/E ratio is 142.90. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LGTY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to LGTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, NTCL has a market cap of 504.59M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while NTCL trades at $28.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas NTCL's P/E ratio is -353.75. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NTCL's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to NTCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, NXLLF has a market cap of 496.10M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while NXLLF trades at $1.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas NXLLF's P/E ratio is 150.00. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NXLLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to NXLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, NSWEF has a market cap of 480.31M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while NSWEF trades at $1.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas NSWEF's P/E ratio is -12.53. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NSWEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to NSWEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, TCYSF has a market cap of 471.76M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while TCYSF trades at $31.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas TCYSF's P/E ratio is 227.13. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TCYSF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to TCYSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, CMDXF has a market cap of 471.13M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while CMDXF trades at $5.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas CMDXF's P/E ratio is 27.21. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CMDXF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to CMDXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, BRDLF has a market cap of 453.22M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while BRDLF trades at $5.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas BRDLF's P/E ratio is 26.74. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BRDLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to BRDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, MITK has a market cap of 440.67M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while MITK trades at $9.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas MITK's P/E ratio is 97.40. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MITK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to MITK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, APPS has a market cap of 436.83M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while APPS trades at $4.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas APPS's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to APPS's ROE of -1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to APPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, BLKLF has a market cap of 416.13M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while BLKLF trades at $4.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas BLKLF's P/E ratio is -70.57. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BLKLF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to BLKLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, IQGLF has a market cap of 415.88M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while IQGLF trades at $6.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas IQGLF's P/E ratio is -300.00. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IQGLF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to IQGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, BIGC has a market cap of 410.08M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while BIGC trades at $5.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas BIGC's P/E ratio is -14.74. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BIGC's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to BIGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, CHNVF has a market cap of 406.86M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while CHNVF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas CHNVF's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CHNVF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to CHNVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, TRAK has a market cap of 402.16M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while TRAK trades at $22.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas TRAK's P/E ratio is 68.78. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TRAK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to TRAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, CRNC has a market cap of 401.87M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while CRNC trades at $9.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas CRNC's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CRNC's ROE of -2.89%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to CRNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, AMSWA has a market cap of 388.51M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while AMSWA trades at $10.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas AMSWA's P/E ratio is 40.56. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AMSWA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to AMSWA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, RPGHF has a market cap of 375.23M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while RPGHF trades at $1.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas RPGHF's P/E ratio is 56.33. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RPGHF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to RPGHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, PSSWF has a market cap of 368.50M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while PSSWF trades at $23.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas PSSWF's P/E ratio is -475.85. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PSSWF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to PSSWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, LCHTF has a market cap of 365.21M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while LCHTF trades at $14.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas LCHTF's P/E ratio is 8.34. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LCHTF's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to LCHTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, AHI has a market cap of 358.19M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while AHI trades at $1.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas AHI's P/E ratio is -4.69. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AHI's ROE of +5.95%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to AHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, JAPPF has a market cap of 350.66M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while JAPPF trades at $14.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas JAPPF's P/E ratio is 24.03. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to JAPPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to JAPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, INS has a market cap of 341.39M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while INS trades at $40.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas INS's P/E ratio is 41.82. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to INS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to INS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, ELMFF has a market cap of 335.28M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while ELMFF trades at $3.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas ELMFF's P/E ratio is -5.78. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ELMFF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to ELMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, PXPHF has a market cap of 333.53M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while PXPHF trades at $3.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas PXPHF's P/E ratio is 29.77. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PXPHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to PXPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, DOMO has a market cap of 327.11M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while DOMO trades at $8.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas DOMO's P/E ratio is -3.85. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DOMO's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to DOMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, MIXT has a market cap of 322.44M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while MIXT trades at $14.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas MIXT's P/E ratio is 48.50. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MIXT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to MIXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, RLLMF has a market cap of 320.45M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while RLLMF trades at $4.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas RLLMF's P/E ratio is 216.50. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RLLMF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to RLLMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, MTLS has a market cap of 316.90M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while MTLS trades at $5.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas MTLS's P/E ratio is 29.81. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MTLS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to MTLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, WALD has a market cap of 315.99M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while WALD trades at $2.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas WALD's P/E ratio is -7.23. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WALD's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to WALD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, PLDIF has a market cap of 311.29M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while PLDIF trades at $7.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas PLDIF's P/E ratio is 69.55. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PLDIF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to PLDIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, RMNI has a market cap of 306.56M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while RMNI trades at $3.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas RMNI's P/E ratio is -9.03. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RMNI's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to RMNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, BAINF has a market cap of 306.48M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while BAINF trades at $2.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas BAINF's P/E ratio is 134.50. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BAINF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to BAINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, DOTDF has a market cap of 303.78M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while DOTDF trades at $0.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas DOTDF's P/E ratio is 19.80. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DOTDF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to DOTDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, GBUX has a market cap of 296.96M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while GBUX trades at $3.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas GBUX's P/E ratio is -78.50. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GBUX's ROE of +1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to GBUX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, IVUFF has a market cap of 295.99M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while IVUFF trades at $17.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas IVUFF's P/E ratio is 21.67. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IVUFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to IVUFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, PBTS has a market cap of 284.02M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while PBTS trades at $1.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas PBTS's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PBTS's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to PBTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, CIGMF has a market cap of 283.56M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while CIGMF trades at $1.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas CIGMF's P/E ratio is -155.00. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CIGMF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to CIGMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, NRDY has a market cap of 280.06M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while NRDY trades at $1.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas NRDY's P/E ratio is -4.04. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NRDY's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to NRDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, ASUR has a market cap of 271.00M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while ASUR trades at $9.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas ASUR's P/E ratio is -18.83. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ASUR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to ASUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, LOQPF has a market cap of 270.23M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while LOQPF trades at $6.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas LOQPF's P/E ratio is 30.45. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LOQPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to LOQPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, EXMXF has a market cap of 263.93M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while EXMXF trades at $0.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas EXMXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EXMXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to EXMXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, MRT has a market cap of 251.61M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while MRT trades at $3.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas MRT's P/E ratio is -2.64. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MRT's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to MRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, EGHT has a market cap of 243.63M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while EGHT trades at $1.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas EGHT's P/E ratio is -5.14. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EGHT's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to EGHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, BZAIW has a market cap of 243.58M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while BZAIW trades at $0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas BZAIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BZAIW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to BZAIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, LAW has a market cap of 242.32M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while LAW trades at $3.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas LAW's P/E ratio is -4.28. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LAW's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to LAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, KC has a market cap of 240.38M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while KC trades at $13.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas KC's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KC's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to KC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, EB has a market cap of 236.11M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while EB trades at $2.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas EB's P/E ratio is -14.68. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EB's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to EB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, IMMR has a market cap of 235.85M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while IMMR trades at $7.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas IMMR's P/E ratio is 4.04. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IMMR's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to IMMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, ABXXF has a market cap of 235.15M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while ABXXF trades at $6.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas ABXXF's P/E ratio is -5.77. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ABXXF's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to ABXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, OCFT has a market cap of 226.28M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while OCFT trades at $6.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas OCFT's P/E ratio is -2.44. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OCFT's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to OCFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, DSP has a market cap of 225.34M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while DSP trades at $14.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas DSP's P/E ratio is 101.57. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DSP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to DSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, EXFY has a market cap of 219.86M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while EXFY trades at $2.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas EXFY's P/E ratio is -19.83. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EXFY's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to EXFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, DAHLF has a market cap of 216.46M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while DAHLF trades at $0.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas DAHLF's P/E ratio is -42.00. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DAHLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to DAHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, ONTF has a market cap of 206.12M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while ONTF trades at $4.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas ONTF's P/E ratio is -4.82. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ONTF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to ONTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, FXSRF has a market cap of 204.57M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while FXSRF trades at $6.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas FXSRF's P/E ratio is 33.42. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FXSRF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to FXSRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, BCOV has a market cap of 202.10M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while BCOV trades at $4.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas BCOV's P/E ratio is -21.19. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BCOV's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to BCOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, SSTI has a market cap of 198.60M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while SSTI trades at $15.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas SSTI's P/E ratio is -21.78. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SSTI's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to SSTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, PERF has a market cap of 195.55M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while PERF trades at $1.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas PERF's P/E ratio is 27.43. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PERF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to PERF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, FBSFF has a market cap of 195.53M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while FBSFF trades at $17.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas FBSFF's P/E ratio is 18.36. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FBSFF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to FBSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, MCAP has a market cap of 194.05M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while MCAP trades at $8.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas MCAP's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MCAP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to MCAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, RAAS has a market cap of 185.74M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while RAAS trades at $1.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas RAAS's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RAAS's ROE of -2.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to RAAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, FRGE has a market cap of 179.38M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while FRGE trades at $14.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas FRGE's P/E ratio is -2.69. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FRGE's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to FRGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, PERF-WT has a market cap of 177.23M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while PERF-WT trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas PERF-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PERF-WT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to PERF-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, SMTEF has a market cap of 173.05M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while SMTEF trades at $4.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas SMTEF's P/E ratio is -7.22. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SMTEF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to SMTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, MAPS has a market cap of 172.87M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while MAPS trades at $1.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas MAPS's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MAPS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to MAPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, CCRD has a market cap of 159.98M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while CCRD trades at $20.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas CCRD's P/E ratio is 30.66. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CCRD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to CCRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, SMRT has a market cap of 159.95M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while SMRT trades at $0.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas SMRT's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SMRT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to SMRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, AEYE has a market cap of 155.23M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while AEYE trades at $12.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas AEYE's P/E ratio is -30.39. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AEYE's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to AEYE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, SYZLF has a market cap of 154.37M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while SYZLF trades at $6.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas SYZLF's P/E ratio is -330.00. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SYZLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to SYZLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, IARGF has a market cap of 153.43M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while IARGF trades at $12.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas IARGF's P/E ratio is -11.43. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IARGF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to IARGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, CBSZF has a market cap of 152.34M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while CBSZF trades at $4.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas CBSZF's P/E ratio is 24.65. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CBSZF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to CBSZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, TCIIF has a market cap of 151.73M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while TCIIF trades at $5.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas TCIIF's P/E ratio is 250.00. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TCIIF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to TCIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, THNCF has a market cap of 146.26M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while THNCF trades at $2.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas THNCF's P/E ratio is 107.50. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to THNCF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to THNCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, EGAN has a market cap of 142.06M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while EGAN trades at $5.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas EGAN's P/E ratio is 33.67. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EGAN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to EGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, DFORF has a market cap of 140.30M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while DFORF trades at $3.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas DFORF's P/E ratio is 27.15. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DFORF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to DFORF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, WECMF has a market cap of 137.17M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while WECMF trades at $3.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas WECMF's P/E ratio is -7.80. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WECMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to WECMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, NEOJF has a market cap of 135.32M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while NEOJF trades at $9.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas NEOJF's P/E ratio is 21.98. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NEOJF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to NEOJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, SVCO has a market cap of 129.15M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while SVCO trades at $4.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas SVCO's P/E ratio is -2.87. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SVCO's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to SVCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, ATHR has a market cap of 128.88M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while ATHR trades at $10.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas ATHR's P/E ratio is -106.50. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ATHR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to ATHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, PSHPF has a market cap of 125.67M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while PSHPF trades at $10.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas PSHPF's P/E ratio is 13.34. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PSHPF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to PSHPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, RTME has a market cap of 125.02M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while RTME trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas RTME's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RTME's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to RTME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, VCTTF has a market cap of 123.92M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while VCTTF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas VCTTF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VCTTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to VCTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, VCSA has a market cap of 123.26M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while VCSA trades at $5.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas VCSA's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VCSA's ROE of -2.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to VCSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, TFSVF has a market cap of 120.97M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while TFSVF trades at $1.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas TFSVF's P/E ratio is 0.61. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TFSVF's ROE of +3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to TFSVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, FHGDF has a market cap of 120.33M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while FHGDF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas FHGDF's P/E ratio is 10.03. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FHGDF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to FHGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, SIXD has a market cap of 120.01M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while SIXD trades at $26.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas SIXD's P/E ratio is 26.53. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SIXD's ROE of -11.57%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to SIXD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, STIX has a market cap of 117.67M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while STIX trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas STIX's P/E ratio is -1.88. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to STIX's ROE of -1.89%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to STIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, EXSPF has a market cap of 116.81M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while EXSPF trades at $1.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas EXSPF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EXSPF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to EXSPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, BTGHF has a market cap of 112.45M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while BTGHF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas BTGHF's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BTGHF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to BTGHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, WONDF has a market cap of 104.41M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while WONDF trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas WONDF's P/E ratio is 15.79. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WONDF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to WONDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, LAAB has a market cap of 103.10M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while LAAB trades at $1.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas LAAB's P/E ratio is -15.45. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LAAB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to LAAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, PPRRF has a market cap of 101.21M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while PPRRF trades at $0.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas PPRRF's P/E ratio is -37.88. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PPRRF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to PPRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, RSSS has a market cap of 100.55M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while RSSS trades at $3.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas RSSS's P/E ratio is -23.69. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RSSS's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to RSSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, ALTS has a market cap of 98.08M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while ALTS trades at $6.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas ALTS's P/E ratio is -10.89. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ALTS's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to ALTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, CLBR-WT has a market cap of 96.53M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while CLBR-WT trades at $2.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas CLBR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CLBR-WT's ROE of -3.74%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to CLBR-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, KLR has a market cap of 96.48M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while KLR trades at $7.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas KLR's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KLR's ROE of -1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to KLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, SNCRL has a market cap of 94.29M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while SNCRL trades at $25.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas SNCRL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SNCRL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to SNCRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, IPNAF has a market cap of 91.78M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while IPNAF trades at $27.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas IPNAF's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IPNAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to IPNAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, ITMSF has a market cap of 91.05M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while ITMSF trades at $1.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas ITMSF's P/E ratio is 30.80. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ITMSF's ROE of -2.93%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to ITMSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, BBYLF has a market cap of 90.83M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while BBYLF trades at $1.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas BBYLF's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BBYLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to BBYLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, IDBA has a market cap of 90.79M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while IDBA trades at $4.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas IDBA's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IDBA's ROE of -2.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to IDBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, TREN has a market cap of 90.31M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while TREN trades at $1.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas TREN's P/E ratio is -140.00. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TREN's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to TREN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, PSQH has a market cap of 88.67M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while PSQH trades at $2.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas PSQH's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PSQH's ROE of -3.74%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to PSQH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, DUOT has a market cap of 86.59M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while DUOT trades at $7.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas DUOT's P/E ratio is -5.35. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DUOT's ROE of -3.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to DUOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, RPMT has a market cap of 86.52M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while RPMT trades at $0.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas RPMT's P/E ratio is -7.06. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RPMT's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to RPMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, VCCBF has a market cap of 86.43M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while VCCBF trades at $3.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas VCCBF's P/E ratio is -15.18. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VCCBF's ROE of -5.59%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to VCCBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, CIH has a market cap of 85.70M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while CIH trades at $0.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas CIH's P/E ratio is 2.71. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CIH's ROE of +1.67%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to CIH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, AELTF has a market cap of 83.53M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while AELTF trades at $1.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas AELTF's P/E ratio is -18.33. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AELTF's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to AELTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, LPSN has a market cap of 78.87M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while LPSN trades at $0.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas LPSN's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LPSN's ROE of -8.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to LPSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, API has a market cap of 78.85M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while API trades at $3.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas API's P/E ratio is -7.67. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to API's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to API. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, DPSI has a market cap of 78.54M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while DPSI trades at $10.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas DPSI's P/E ratio is 102.25. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DPSI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to DPSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, OSSIF has a market cap of 76.43M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while OSSIF trades at $0.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas OSSIF's P/E ratio is -62.50. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OSSIF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to OSSIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, DLEXY has a market cap of 72.91M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while DLEXY trades at $1.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas DLEXY's P/E ratio is -11.07. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DLEXY's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to DLEXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, NUKK has a market cap of 72.72M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while NUKK trades at $15.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas NUKK's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NUKK's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to NUKK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, CCGWW has a market cap of 70.62M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while CCGWW trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas CCGWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CCGWW's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to CCGWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, EMBK has a market cap of 70.20M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while EMBK trades at $2.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas EMBK's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EMBK's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to EMBK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, EMBKW has a market cap of 70.20M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while EMBKW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas EMBKW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EMBKW's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to EMBKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, AVAI has a market cap of 68.68M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while AVAI trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas AVAI's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AVAI's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to AVAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, MTWO has a market cap of 67.51M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while MTWO trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas MTWO's P/E ratio is -11.00. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MTWO's ROE of +1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to MTWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, UPLD has a market cap of 67.51M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while UPLD trades at $2.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas UPLD's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to UPLD's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to UPLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, URLOF has a market cap of 67.12M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while URLOF trades at $0.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas URLOF's P/E ratio is 74.69. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to URLOF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to URLOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, RCT has a market cap of 66.78M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while RCT trades at $1.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas RCT's P/E ratio is -1.68. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RCT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to RCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, TROO has a market cap of 66.63M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while TROO trades at $0.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas TROO's P/E ratio is -4.56. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TROO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to TROO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, BIYA has a market cap of 62.25M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while BIYA trades at $4.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas BIYA's P/E ratio is -71.14. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BIYA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to BIYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, CSAI has a market cap of 61.62M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while CSAI trades at $4.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas CSAI's P/E ratio is -8.88. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CSAI's ROE of -5.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to CSAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, PHUN has a market cap of 61.12M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while PHUN trades at $3.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas PHUN's P/E ratio is -3.22. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PHUN's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to PHUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, NYWKF has a market cap of 61.05M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while NYWKF trades at $1.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas NYWKF's P/E ratio is 10.29. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NYWKF's ROE of +1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to NYWKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, BMTX has a market cap of 60.44M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while BMTX trades at $5.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas BMTX's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BMTX's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to BMTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, DUBRF has a market cap of 60.34M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while DUBRF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas DUBRF's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DUBRF's ROE of -1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to DUBRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, XTRAF has a market cap of 58.98M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while XTRAF trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas XTRAF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to XTRAF's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to XTRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, RDZN has a market cap of 58.76M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while RDZN trades at $0.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas RDZN's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RDZN's ROE of +820570.73%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to RDZN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, TDMMF has a market cap of 57.90M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while TDMMF trades at $0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas TDMMF's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TDMMF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to TDMMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, WFCF has a market cap of 57.83M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while WFCF trades at $11.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas WFCF's P/E ratio is 27.63. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WFCF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to WFCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, YAAS has a market cap of 57.37M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while YAAS trades at $1.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas YAAS's P/E ratio is -42.75. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to YAAS's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to YAAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, SURG has a market cap of 57.15M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while SURG trades at $2.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas SURG's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SURG's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to SURG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, JAXAF has a market cap of 56.66M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while JAXAF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas JAXAF's P/E ratio is -2.25. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to JAXAF's ROE of -7.90%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to JAXAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, IDN has a market cap of 56.08M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while IDN trades at $2.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas IDN's P/E ratio is -56.60. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IDN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to IDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, SAGT has a market cap of 55.85M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while SAGT trades at $4.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas SAGT's P/E ratio is 29.67. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SAGT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to SAGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, INLX has a market cap of 55.05M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while INLX trades at $12.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas INLX's P/E ratio is -98.15. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to INLX's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to INLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, VRXWF has a market cap of 54.89M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while VRXWF trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas VRXWF's P/E ratio is -5.88. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VRXWF's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to VRXWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, OTMOW has a market cap of 52.37M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while OTMOW trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas OTMOW's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OTMOW's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to OTMOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, OTMO has a market cap of 52.37M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while OTMO trades at $5.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas OTMO's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OTMO's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to OTMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, AVOI has a market cap of 52.22M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while AVOI trades at $0.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas AVOI's P/E ratio is -10.83. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AVOI's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to AVOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, CPTN has a market cap of 52.17M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while CPTN trades at $3.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas CPTN's P/E ratio is -1.99. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CPTN's ROE of -5.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to CPTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, TIEKF has a market cap of 49.84M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while TIEKF trades at $25.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas TIEKF's P/E ratio is 69.38. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TIEKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to TIEKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, QIFTF has a market cap of 49.31M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while QIFTF trades at $0.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas QIFTF's P/E ratio is 33.50. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to QIFTF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to QIFTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, GEMSF has a market cap of 48.35M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while GEMSF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas GEMSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GEMSF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to GEMSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, DGHI has a market cap of 46.88M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while DGHI trades at $1.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas DGHI's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DGHI's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to DGHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, BLIV has a market cap of 46.39M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while BLIV trades at $4.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas BLIV's P/E ratio is -15.81. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BLIV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to BLIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, ESKKF has a market cap of 45.29M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while ESKKF trades at $0.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas ESKKF's P/E ratio is 34.39. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ESKKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to ESKKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, WHSPF has a market cap of 45.11M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while WHSPF trades at $0.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas WHSPF's P/E ratio is -5.41. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WHSPF's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to WHSPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, HIT has a market cap of 44.71M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while HIT trades at $0.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas HIT's P/E ratio is 40.89. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HIT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to HIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, IREHF has a market cap of 42.56M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while IREHF trades at $0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas IREHF's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IREHF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to IREHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, BMR has a market cap of 40.97M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while BMR trades at $2.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas BMR's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BMR's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to BMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, MKTW has a market cap of 40.06M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while MKTW trades at $15.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas MKTW's P/E ratio is 4.20. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MKTW's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to MKTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, BSQR has a market cap of 37.56M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while BSQR trades at $1.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas BSQR's P/E ratio is -14.54. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BSQR's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to BSQR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, ISDR has a market cap of 37.00M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while ISDR trades at $9.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas ISDR's P/E ratio is -27.57. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ISDR's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to ISDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, LGCL has a market cap of 36.89M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while LGCL trades at $0.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas LGCL's P/E ratio is 6.64. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LGCL's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to LGCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, MPSFF has a market cap of 36.78M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while MPSFF trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas MPSFF's P/E ratio is -19.00. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MPSFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to MPSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, TERNF has a market cap of 36.04M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while TERNF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas TERNF's P/E ratio is 4.14. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TERNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to TERNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, EBIX has a market cap of 35.85M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while EBIX trades at $1.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas EBIX's P/E ratio is 7.25. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EBIX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to EBIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, AWRE has a market cap of 35.22M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while AWRE trades at $1.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas AWRE's P/E ratio is -6.96. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AWRE's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to AWRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, NOWG has a market cap of 34.87M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while NOWG trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas NOWG's P/E ratio is -24.99. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NOWG's ROE of +7.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to NOWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, AIFF has a market cap of 33.82M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while AIFF trades at $2.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas AIFF's P/E ratio is -1.82. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AIFF's ROE of -6.66%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to AIFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, SWVLW has a market cap of 33.26M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while SWVLW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas SWVLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SWVLW's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to SWVLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, SWVL has a market cap of 32.76M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while SWVL trades at $3.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas SWVL's P/E ratio is -2.39. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SWVL's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to SWVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, BTTC has a market cap of 32.32M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while BTTC trades at $6.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas BTTC's P/E ratio is -12.60. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BTTC's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to BTTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, WANSF has a market cap of 31.59M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while WANSF trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas WANSF's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WANSF's ROE of -1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to WANSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, RENN has a market cap of 30.90M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while RENN trades at $1.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas RENN's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RENN's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to RENN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, STEEF has a market cap of 29.54M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while STEEF trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas STEEF's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to STEEF's ROE of -2.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to STEEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, MTC has a market cap of 29.47M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while MTC trades at $1.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas MTC's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MTC's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to MTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, CIERF has a market cap of 29.29M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while CIERF trades at $3.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas CIERF's P/E ratio is 13.10. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CIERF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to CIERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, CCTC has a market cap of 29.28M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while CCTC trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas CCTC's P/E ratio is -9.09. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CCTC's ROE of +4.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to CCTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, MHUBF has a market cap of 29.03M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while MHUBF trades at $0.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas MHUBF's P/E ratio is -3.39. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MHUBF's ROE of -4.50%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to MHUBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, TSRI has a market cap of 29.03M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while TSRI trades at $13.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas TSRI's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TSRI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to TSRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, NMYSF has a market cap of 28.94M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while NMYSF trades at $1.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas NMYSF's P/E ratio is 15.39. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NMYSF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to NMYSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, NTWK has a market cap of 28.57M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while NTWK trades at $2.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas NTWK's P/E ratio is -34.86. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NTWK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to NTWK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, MNDO has a market cap of 28.21M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while MNDO trades at $1.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas MNDO's P/E ratio is 6.30. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MNDO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to MNDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, TEKCF has a market cap of 27.48M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while TEKCF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas TEKCF's P/E ratio is 1.54. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TEKCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to TEKCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, SNNSF has a market cap of 26.49M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while SNNSF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas SNNSF's P/E ratio is -3.34. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SNNSF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to SNNSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, HKIT has a market cap of 25.96M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while HKIT trades at $1.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas HKIT's P/E ratio is -30.75. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HKIT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to HKIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, PTRRF has a market cap of 25.76M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while PTRRF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas PTRRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PTRRF's ROE of +2.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to PTRRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, INVU has a market cap of 25.66M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while INVU trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas INVU's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to INVU's ROE of -8.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to INVU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, PAYD has a market cap of 24.33M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while PAYD trades at $2.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas PAYD's P/E ratio is 33.22. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PAYD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to PAYD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, PWWBF has a market cap of 24.12M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while PWWBF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas PWWBF's P/E ratio is -3.91. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PWWBF's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to PWWBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, SYPT has a market cap of 24.06M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while SYPT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas SYPT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SYPT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to SYPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, GARLF has a market cap of 23.79M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while GARLF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas GARLF's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GARLF's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to GARLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, LQAVF has a market cap of 23.45M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while LQAVF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas LQAVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LQAVF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to LQAVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, INXDF has a market cap of 23.25M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while INXDF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas INXDF's P/E ratio is 1.40. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to INXDF's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to INXDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, LTCH has a market cap of 23.08M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while LTCH trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas LTCH's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LTCH's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to LTCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, OONEF has a market cap of 22.91M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while OONEF trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas OONEF's P/E ratio is -22.77. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OONEF's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to OONEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, EZFL has a market cap of 22.69M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while EZFL trades at $3.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas EZFL's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EZFL's ROE of +10.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to EZFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, RSASF has a market cap of 22.29M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while RSASF trades at $0.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas RSASF's P/E ratio is -27.85. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RSASF's ROE of +2.96%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to RSASF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, MFON has a market cap of 21.72M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while MFON trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas MFON's P/E ratio is -2.31. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MFON's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to MFON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, CXAI has a market cap of 21.59M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while CXAI trades at $1.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas CXAI's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CXAI's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to CXAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, IMNTF has a market cap of 21.52M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while IMNTF trades at $2.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas IMNTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IMNTF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to IMNTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, ELCO has a market cap of 21.21M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while ELCO trades at $42.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas ELCO's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ELCO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to ELCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, CXAIW has a market cap of 20.39M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while CXAIW trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas CXAIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CXAIW's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to CXAIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, LDTC has a market cap of 19.75M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while LDTC trades at $0.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas LDTC's P/E ratio is 0.08. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LDTC's ROE of +1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to LDTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, BBRDF has a market cap of 19.35M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while BBRDF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas BBRDF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BBRDF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to BBRDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, LDTCW has a market cap of 19.14M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while LDTCW trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas LDTCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LDTCW's ROE of +1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to LDTCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, NVNIW has a market cap of 18.85M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while NVNIW trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas NVNIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NVNIW's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to NVNIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, SMSI has a market cap of 18.83M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while SMSI trades at $0.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas SMSI's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SMSI's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to SMSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, PALT has a market cap of 18.75M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while PALT trades at $2.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas PALT's P/E ratio is -5.80. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PALT's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to PALT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, NVNI has a market cap of 18.35M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while NVNI trades at $0.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas NVNI's P/E ratio is -1.18. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NVNI's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to NVNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, TRSO has a market cap of 17.61M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while TRSO trades at $1.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas TRSO's P/E ratio is -92.50. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TRSO's ROE of +2.59%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to TRSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, CREX has a market cap of 17.55M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while CREX trades at $1.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas CREX's P/E ratio is -4.94. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CREX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to CREX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, TWOH has a market cap of 17.50M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while TWOH trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas TWOH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TWOH's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to TWOH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, AMOD has a market cap of 17.34M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while AMOD trades at $1.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas AMOD's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AMOD's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to AMOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, ANY has a market cap of 16.86M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while ANY trades at $0.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas ANY's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ANY's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to ANY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, ARHLF has a market cap of 16.44M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while ARHLF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas ARHLF's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ARHLF's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to ARHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, MAPPF has a market cap of 16.37M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while MAPPF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas MAPPF's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MAPPF's ROE of +7.92%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to MAPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, IPM has a market cap of 16.26M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while IPM trades at $1.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas IPM's P/E ratio is -3.67. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IPM's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to IPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, STEC has a market cap of 16.10M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while STEC trades at $1.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas STEC's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to STEC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to STEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, GVP has a market cap of 16.04M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while GVP trades at $4.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas GVP's P/E ratio is -1.83. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GVP's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to GVP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, CNTM has a market cap of 15.63M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while CNTM trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas CNTM's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CNTM's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to CNTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, WBSR has a market cap of 15.53M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while WBSR trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas WBSR's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WBSR's ROE of +2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to WBSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, SEAC has a market cap of 15.51M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while SEAC trades at $6.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas SEAC's P/E ratio is -1.63. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SEAC's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to SEAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, BNZI has a market cap of 15.12M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while BNZI trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas BNZI's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BNZI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to BNZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, AHIX has a market cap of 15.02M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while AHIX trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas AHIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AHIX's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to AHIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, BNZIW has a market cap of 14.99M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while BNZIW trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas BNZIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BNZIW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to BNZIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, EOSI has a market cap of 14.85M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while EOSI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas EOSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EOSI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to EOSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, GREEL has a market cap of 14.32M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while GREEL trades at $7.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas GREEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GREEL's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to GREEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, NXPL has a market cap of 14.28M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while NXPL trades at $0.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas NXPL's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NXPL's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to NXPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, VXTRF has a market cap of 14.04M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while VXTRF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas VXTRF's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VXTRF's ROE of -3.76%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to VXTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, LSPKF has a market cap of 14.02M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while LSPKF trades at $0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas LSPKF's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LSPKF's ROE of -2.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to LSPKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, NXPLW has a market cap of 13.83M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while NXPLW trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas NXPLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NXPLW's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to NXPLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, HTCR has a market cap of 13.63M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while HTCR trades at $0.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas HTCR's P/E ratio is -8.82. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HTCR's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to HTCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, WETG has a market cap of 13.26M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while WETG trades at $5.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas WETG's P/E ratio is -7.21. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WETG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to WETG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, CINGF has a market cap of 12.96M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while CINGF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas CINGF's P/E ratio is -5.72. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CINGF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to CINGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, ADCOF has a market cap of 12.83M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while ADCOF trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas ADCOF's P/E ratio is -21.20. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ADCOF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to ADCOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, ULY has a market cap of 12.71M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while ULY trades at $10.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas ULY's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ULY's ROE of +2.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to ULY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, XTKG has a market cap of 12.52M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while XTKG trades at $0.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas XTKG's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to XTKG's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to XTKG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, IFBD has a market cap of 12.36M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while IFBD trades at $1.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas IFBD's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IFBD's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to IFBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, QH has a market cap of 11.76M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while QH trades at $1.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas QH's P/E ratio is 132.00. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to QH's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to QH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, SPPL has a market cap of 11.72M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while SPPL trades at $3.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas SPPL's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SPPL's ROE of -1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to SPPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, AKRFF has a market cap of 11.67M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while AKRFF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas AKRFF's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AKRFF's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to AKRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, DATS has a market cap of 11.42M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while DATS trades at $2.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas DATS's P/E ratio is -1.87. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DATS's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to DATS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, BLBX has a market cap of 11.42M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while BLBX trades at $3.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas BLBX's P/E ratio is -3.08. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BLBX's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to BLBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, WALDW has a market cap of 11.10M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while WALDW trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas WALDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WALDW's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to WALDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, ORKT has a market cap of 11.03M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while ORKT trades at $0.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas ORKT's P/E ratio is -1.63. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ORKT's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to ORKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, IONI has a market cap of 10.89M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while IONI trades at $0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas IONI's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IONI's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to IONI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, SSNT has a market cap of 10.84M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while SSNT trades at $16.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas SSNT's P/E ratio is -9.27. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SSNT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to SSNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, HLLPF has a market cap of 10.84M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while HLLPF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas HLLPF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HLLPF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to HLLPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, FMEGF has a market cap of 10.69M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while FMEGF trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas FMEGF's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FMEGF's ROE of +1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to FMEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, BSKZF has a market cap of 10.56M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while BSKZF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas BSKZF's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BSKZF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to BSKZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, MTBL has a market cap of 10.37M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while MTBL trades at $0.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas MTBL's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MTBL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to MTBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, AGIL has a market cap of 10.32M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while AGIL trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas AGIL's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AGIL's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to AGIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, AGILW has a market cap of 10.32M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while AGILW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas AGILW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AGILW's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to AGILW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, INPX has a market cap of 10.24M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while INPX trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas INPX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to INPX's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to INPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, FBSE has a market cap of 10.12M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while FBSE trades at $1.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas FBSE's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FBSE's ROE of -2.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to FBSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, CONMF has a market cap of 9.97M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while CONMF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas CONMF's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CONMF's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to CONMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, HMBL has a market cap of 9.95M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while HMBL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas HMBL's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HMBL's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to HMBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, LYT has a market cap of 9.93M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while LYT trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas LYT's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LYT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to LYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, JTAI has a market cap of 9.82M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while JTAI trades at $4.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas JTAI's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to JTAI's ROE of +9.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to JTAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, AMST has a market cap of 9.81M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while AMST trades at $2.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas AMST's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AMST's ROE of -1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to AMST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, AIXI has a market cap of 9.80M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while AIXI trades at $3.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas AIXI's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AIXI's ROE of +2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to AIXI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, RAASY has a market cap of 9.73M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while RAASY trades at $1.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas RAASY's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RAASY's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to RAASY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, VS has a market cap of 9.71M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while VS trades at $1.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas VS's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VS's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to VS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, RBT has a market cap of 9.39M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while RBT trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas RBT's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RBT's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to RBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, INXSF has a market cap of 9.19M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while INXSF trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas INXSF's P/E ratio is 8.98. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to INXSF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to INXSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, MFI has a market cap of 9.14M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while MFI trades at $0.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas MFI's P/E ratio is -3.29. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MFI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to MFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, FALC has a market cap of 9.06M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while FALC trades at $1.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas FALC's P/E ratio is -31.75. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FALC's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to FALC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, BMTX-WT has a market cap of 8.92M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while BMTX-WT trades at $0.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas BMTX-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BMTX-WT's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to BMTX-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, NNVUF has a market cap of 8.91M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while NNVUF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas NNVUF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NNVUF's ROE of -3.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to NNVUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, ACWRF has a market cap of 8.89M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while ACWRF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas ACWRF's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ACWRF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to ACWRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, FAASW has a market cap of 8.73M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while FAASW trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas FAASW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FAASW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to FAASW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, KWIK has a market cap of 8.56M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while KWIK trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas KWIK's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KWIK's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to KWIK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, MVAIF has a market cap of 8.55M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while MVAIF trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas MVAIF's P/E ratio is -4.41. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MVAIF's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to MVAIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, XELA has a market cap of 8.51M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while XELA trades at $0.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas XELA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to XELA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to XELA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, ONEI has a market cap of 8.46M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while ONEI trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas ONEI's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ONEI's ROE of +3.50%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to ONEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, IDXAF has a market cap of 8.38M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while IDXAF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas IDXAF's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IDXAF's ROE of -2.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to IDXAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, ZDGGF has a market cap of 8.31M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while ZDGGF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas ZDGGF's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ZDGGF's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to ZDGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, LTCHW has a market cap of 8.13M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while LTCHW trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas LTCHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LTCHW's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to LTCHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, PETWW has a market cap of 8.03M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while PETWW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas PETWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PETWW's ROE of +61.80%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to PETWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, ROWKF has a market cap of 7.93M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while ROWKF trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas ROWKF's P/E ratio is -19.50. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ROWKF's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to ROWKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, RTC has a market cap of 7.89M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while RTC trades at $0.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas RTC's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RTC's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to RTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, CLGUF has a market cap of 7.83M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while CLGUF trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas CLGUF's P/E ratio is -1.71. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CLGUF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to CLGUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, AILQF has a market cap of 7.66M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while AILQF trades at $0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas AILQF's P/E ratio is 26.00. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AILQF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to AILQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, PET has a market cap of 7.66M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while PET trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas PET's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PET's ROE of +61.80%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to PET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, SPONF has a market cap of 7.60M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while SPONF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas SPONF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SPONF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to SPONF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, WPNDF has a market cap of 7.39M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while WPNDF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas WPNDF's P/E ratio is -13.47. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WPNDF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to WPNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, CYN has a market cap of 7.24M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while CYN trades at $4.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas CYN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CYN's ROE of -3.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to CYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, MYIDF has a market cap of 6.84M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while MYIDF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas MYIDF's P/E ratio is 5.80. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MYIDF's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to MYIDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, VERB has a market cap of 6.83M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while VERB trades at $6.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas VERB's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VERB's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to VERB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, BGRDF has a market cap of 6.83M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while BGRDF trades at $0.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas BGRDF's P/E ratio is -3.24. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BGRDF's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is less volatile compared to BGRDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.

SHOP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SHOP stands at 137.45B. In comparison, VQSSF has a market cap of 6.80M. Regarding current trading prices, SHOP is priced at $106.15, while VQSSF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SHOP currently has a P/E ratio of 68.48, whereas VQSSF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, SHOP's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VQSSF's ROE of -2.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SHOP is more volatile compared to VQSSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SHOP.