Sap Se

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 237.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while CRM trades at $248.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 38.84. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check CRM's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 201.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while UBER trades at $96.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 16.49. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check UBER's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 184.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while INTU trades at $662.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 53.96. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check INTU's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 184.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while SHOP trades at $142.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 78.95. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check SHOP's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 184.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while NOW trades at $886.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 111.06. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check NOW's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 149.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while APP trades at $441.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 60.50. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check APP's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 101.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while MSTR trades at $358.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is 25.11. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MSTR's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check MSTR's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 95.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while CDNS trades at $349.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 95.01. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check CDNS's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 65.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while SNOW trades at $196.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is -46.76. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check SNOW's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 62.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while ADSK trades at $290.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 62.40. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check ADSK's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 59.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while WDAY trades at $221.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 122.93. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check WDAY's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 45.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while DDOG trades at $131.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 364.50. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check DDOG's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 44.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while TEAM trades at $170.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is -172.52. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check TEAM's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while FICO trades at $1,415.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 55.39. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check FICO's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while ANSS trades at $374.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 55.53. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check ANSS's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 31.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while STRF trades at $111.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to STRF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is more volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check STRF's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, TTD has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while TTD trades at $53.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas TTD's P/E ratio is 64.10. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TTD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to TTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check TTD's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while PTC trades at $215.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 50.48. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check PTC's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while STRK trades at $96.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to STRK's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check STRK's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while HUBS trades at $474.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is -2061.98. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HUBS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check HUBS's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while ZM trades at $82.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 24.77. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check ZM's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while TYL trades at $561.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 80.24. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check TYL's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while SSNC trades at $90.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 28.45. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check SSNC's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while GRAB trades at $5.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 256.50. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check GRAB's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while GWRE trades at $213.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 522.06. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check GWRE's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while AZPN trades at $264.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AZPN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check AZPN's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, U has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while U trades at $39.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas U's P/E ratio is -36.91. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to U's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check U's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while BSY trades at $54.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 70.06. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check BSY's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while DUOL trades at $331.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 136.01. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check DUOL's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while DOCU trades at $74.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check DOCU's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while DT trades at $49.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 30.49. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check DT's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, QXO has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while QXO trades at $20.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas QXO's P/E ratio is 2.16. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to QXO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to QXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check QXO's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while PAYC trades at $233.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 31.54. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check PAYC's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while MANH trades at $216.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 60.41. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check MANH's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while BKI trades at $75.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check BKI's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while DAY trades at $69.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is 230.63. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DAY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is more volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check DAY's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while XM trades at $18.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check XM's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while CDAY trades at $69.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CDAY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check CDAY's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while PCOR trades at $67.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is -70.62. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check PCOR's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while PCTY trades at $182.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 45.35. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check PCTY's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while APPF trades at $275.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 49.79. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check APPF's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while TTAN trades at $104.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is -28.18. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check TTAN's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while SRAD trades at $31.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 79.07. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check SRAD's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while PEGA trades at $52.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 43.74. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check PEGA's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while MNDY trades at $177.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 234.07. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check MNDY's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while NICE trades at $142.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check NICE's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while DSGX trades at $101.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 61.44. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check DSGX's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while ESTC trades at $80.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is -76.98. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ESTC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check ESTC's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while OTEX trades at $32.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 19.78. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check OTEX's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while CVLT trades at $181.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 101.71. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check CVLT's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while NATI trades at $59.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check NATI's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while SMAR trades at $56.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SMAR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check SMAR's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while BULL trades at $15.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BULL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check BULL's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while GTLB trades at $45.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is 502.00. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GTLB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check GTLB's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while LIF trades at $90.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 237.42. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check LIF's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while IDCC trades at $266.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 18.90. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check IDCC's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while LYFT trades at $17.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 73.96. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check LYFT's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while COUP trades at $80.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check COUP's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while CWAN trades at $20.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is 13.02. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CWAN's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check CWAN's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, SOUNW has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while SOUNW trades at $5.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas SOUNW's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SOUNW's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to SOUNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check SOUNW's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while FROG trades at $47.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is -61.09. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check FROG's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, SOUN has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while SOUN trades at $12.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas SOUN's P/E ratio is -18.47. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SOUN's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to SOUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check SOUN's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while QTWO trades at $79.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is 1325.33. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to QTWO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check QTWO's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while COMP trades at $9.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is -92.90. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to COMP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check COMP's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, RIOT has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while RIOT trades at $13.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas RIOT's P/E ratio is -33.04. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RIOT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to RIOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check RIOT's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while ZETA trades at $19.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is -130.33. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check ZETA's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while WK trades at $79.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas WK's P/E ratio is -67.26. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WK's ROE of +1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to WK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check WK's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while BILL trades at $42.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is -2114.75. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check BILL's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while CVT trades at $8.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check CVT's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, VERX has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while VERX trades at $25.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas VERX's P/E ratio is -78.33. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VERX's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to VERX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check VERX's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while PYCR trades at $22.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check PYCR's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, FRSH has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while FRSH trades at $13.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas FRSH's P/E ratio is -77.61. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FRSH's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to FRSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check FRSH's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while GBTG trades at $8.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is -68.92. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GBTG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check GBTG's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, CALX has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while CALX trades at $58.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas CALX's P/E ratio is -142.61. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CALX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to CALX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check CALX's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while PWSC trades at $22.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check PWSC's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while AYX trades at $48.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check AYX's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while ENV trades at $63.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check ENV's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, YOU has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while YOU trades at $36.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas YOU's P/E ratio is 22.31. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to YOU's ROE of +1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to YOU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check YOU's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, INTA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while INTA trades at $42.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas INTA's P/E ratio is -186.17. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to INTA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to INTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check INTA's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while INST trades at $23.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check INST's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while ZI trades at $9.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 77.92. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check ZI's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, ASAN has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while ASAN trades at $14.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas ASAN's P/E ratio is -14.47. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ASAN's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to ASAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check ASAN's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, NCNO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while NCNO trades at $29.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas NCNO's P/E ratio is -116.32. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NCNO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to NCNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check NCNO's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while RUM trades at $7.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -5.36. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RUM's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to RUM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check RUM's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, BL has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while BL trades at $53.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas BL's P/E ratio is 41.84. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to BL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check BL's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, BLKB has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while BLKB trades at $66.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas BLKB's P/E ratio is -12.11. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BLKB's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to BLKB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check BLKB's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, AGYS has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while AGYS trades at $110.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas AGYS's P/E ratio is 225.57. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AGYS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to AGYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check AGYS's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, GRND has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while GRND trades at $15.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas GRND's P/E ratio is -40.51. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GRND's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to GRND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check GRND's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, RUMBW has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while RUMBW trades at $2.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas RUMBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RUMBW's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to RUMBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check RUMBW's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, ALRM has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while ALRM trades at $59.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas ALRM's P/E ratio is 24.86. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ALRM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to ALRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check ALRM's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, NATL has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while NATL trades at $39.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas NATL's P/E ratio is 23.10. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NATL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to NATL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check NATL's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, BRZE has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while BRZE trades at $26.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas BRZE's P/E ratio is -26.63. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BRZE's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to BRZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check BRZE's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, RNG has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while RNG trades at $30.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas RNG's P/E ratio is -237.38. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RNG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to RNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check RNG's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, CLSK has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while CLSK trades at $9.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas CLSK's P/E ratio is 11.42. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CLSK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to CLSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check CLSK's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while DAVE trades at $199.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 52.65. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check DAVE's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, DV has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while DV trades at $16.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas DV's P/E ratio is 52.06. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to DV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check DV's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, ALKT has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while ALKT trades at $25.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas ALKT's P/E ratio is -66.53. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ALKT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to ALKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check ALKT's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, BTDR has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while BTDR trades at $13.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas BTDR's P/E ratio is -2.78. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BTDR's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is less volatile compared to BTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check BTDR's competition here

SAP plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SAP stands at 316B. In comparison, DCT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SAP is priced at $271.11, while DCT trades at $18.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SAP currently has a P/E ratio of 41.76, whereas DCT's P/E ratio is -172.64. In terms of profitability, SAP's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DCT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SAP is more volatile compared to DCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAP.Check DCT's competition here