SentinelOne, Inc.

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MSFT has a market cap of 2.9T. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while MSFT trades at $384.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas MSFT's P/E ratio is 24.08. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to MSFT's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, S is more volatile compared to MSFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check MSFT's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ORCL has a market cap of 406.1B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while ORCL trades at $141.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas ORCL's P/E ratio is 26.56. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to ORCL's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, S is less volatile compared to ORCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check ORCL's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PLTR has a market cap of 298.4B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while PLTR trades at $130.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas PLTR's P/E ratio is 204.11. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to PLTR's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, S is more volatile compared to PLTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check PLTR's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 103.3B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while ADBE trades at $246.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 14.77. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, S is more volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check ADBE's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PANW has a market cap of 100.5B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while PANW trades at $144.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas PANW's P/E ratio is 91.81. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to PANW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, S is more volatile compared to PANW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check PANW's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CRWD has a market cap of 88.3B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while CRWD trades at $350.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas CRWD's P/E ratio is -273.70. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to CRWD's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, S is less volatile compared to CRWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check CRWD's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SNPS has a market cap of 80.5B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while SNPS trades at $420.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas SNPS's P/E ratio is 52.28. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SNPS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, S is more volatile compared to SNPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check SNPS's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, VMW has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while VMW trades at $142.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas VMW's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to VMW's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, S is more volatile compared to VMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check VMW's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, FTNT has a market cap of 57.9B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while FTNT trades at $75.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas FTNT's P/E ratio is 31.24. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to FTNT's ROE of +1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, S is less volatile compared to FTNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check FTNT's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, NET has a market cap of 56.3B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while NET trades at $160.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas NET's P/E ratio is -571.87. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to NET's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, S is less volatile compared to NET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check NET's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SQ has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while SQ trades at $83.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas SQ's P/E ratio is 49.98. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SQ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, S is more volatile compared to SQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check SQ's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CRWV has a market cap of 45.3B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while CRWV trades at $90.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas CRWV's P/E ratio is -54.72. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to CRWV's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, S is less volatile compared to CRWV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check CRWV's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, XYZ has a market cap of 30.9B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while XYZ trades at $50.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas XYZ's P/E ratio is 10.21. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to XYZ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, S is less volatile compared to XYZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check XYZ's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, NETE has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while NETE trades at $13.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas NETE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to NETE's ROE of +3.34%. Regarding short-term risk, S is less volatile compared to NETE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check NETE's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SPLK has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while SPLK trades at $156.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas SPLK's P/E ratio is 103.22. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SPLK's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, S is more volatile compared to SPLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check SPLK's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MDB has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while MDB trades at $305.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas MDB's P/E ratio is -372.40. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to MDB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, S is less volatile compared to MDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check MDB's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CPAY has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while CPAY trades at $332.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas CPAY's P/E ratio is 22.12. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to CPAY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, S is less volatile compared to CPAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check CPAY's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ZS has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while ZS trades at $143.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas ZS's P/E ratio is -573.12. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to ZS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, S is less volatile compared to ZS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check ZS's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, FLT has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while FLT trades at $303.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas FLT's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to FLT's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, S is more volatile compared to FLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check FLT's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CYBR has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while CYBR trades at $408.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas CYBR's P/E ratio is -139.06. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to CYBR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, S is more volatile compared to CYBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check CYBR's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, VRSN has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while VRSN trades at $211.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas VRSN's P/E ratio is 24.01. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to VRSN's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, S is more volatile compared to VRSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check VRSN's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CHKP has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while CHKP trades at $154.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas CHKP's P/E ratio is 16.08. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to CHKP's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, S is more volatile compared to CHKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check CHKP's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, AFRM has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while AFRM trades at $47.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas AFRM's P/E ratio is 58.19. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to AFRM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, S is less volatile compared to AFRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check AFRM's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, FFIV has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while FFIV trades at $269.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas FFIV's P/E ratio is 22.29. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to FFIV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, S is more volatile compared to FFIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check FFIV's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, TOST has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while TOST trades at $25.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas TOST's P/E ratio is 44.76. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to TOST's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, S is less volatile compared to TOST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check TOST's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, NLOK has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while NLOK trades at $21.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas NLOK's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to NLOK's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, S is less volatile compared to NLOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check NLOK's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, AKAM has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while AKAM trades at $98.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas AKAM's P/E ratio is 28.96. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to AKAM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, S is less volatile compared to AKAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check AKAM's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, IOT has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while IOT trades at $24.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas IOT's P/E ratio is -353.36. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to IOT's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, S is less volatile compared to IOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check IOT's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, KSPI has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while KSPI trades at $71.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas KSPI's P/E ratio is 6.21. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to KSPI's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, S is more volatile compared to KSPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check KSPI's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, GEN has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while GEN trades at $21.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas GEN's P/E ratio is 22.32. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to GEN's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, S is more volatile compared to GEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check GEN's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, GDDY has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while GDDY trades at $87.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas GDDY's P/E ratio is 15.14. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to GDDY's ROE of +2.39%. Regarding short-term risk, S is more volatile compared to GDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check GDDY's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, OKTA has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while OKTA trades at $69.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas OKTA's P/E ratio is 63.19. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to OKTA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, S is less volatile compared to OKTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check OKTA's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CFLT has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while CFLT trades at $30.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas CFLT's P/E ratio is -35.69. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to CFLT's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, S is more volatile compared to CFLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check CFLT's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, NTNX has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while NTNX trades at $37.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas NTNX's P/E ratio is 49.18. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to NTNX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, S is less volatile compared to NTNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check NTNX's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ALTR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while ALTR trades at $111.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas ALTR's P/E ratio is 699.06. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to ALTR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, S is more volatile compared to ALTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check ALTR's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PLAN has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while PLAN trades at $63.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas PLAN's P/E ratio is -44.82. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to PLAN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, S is more volatile compared to PLAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check PLAN's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, RBRK has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while RBRK trades at $47.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas RBRK's P/E ratio is -30.48. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to RBRK's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, S is less volatile compared to RBRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check RBRK's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, INFA has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while INFA trades at $24.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas INFA's P/E ratio is 826.33. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to INFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, S is more volatile compared to INFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check INFA's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, DOX has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while DOX trades at $67.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas DOX's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to DOX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, S is more volatile compared to DOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check DOX's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SAIL has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while SAIL trades at $12.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas SAIL's P/E ratio is -11.09. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SAIL's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, S is less volatile compared to SAIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check SAIL's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, HCP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while HCP trades at $34.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas HCP's P/E ratio is -57.97. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to HCP's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, S is more volatile compared to HCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check HCP's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, JCOM has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while JCOM trades at $142.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas JCOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to JCOM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, S is more volatile compared to JCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check JCOM's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, DBX has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while DBX trades at $24.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas DBX's P/E ratio is 13.92. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to DBX's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, S is less volatile compared to DBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check DBX's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SQSP has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while SQSP trades at $46.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas SQSP's P/E ratio is -1164.25. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SQSP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, S is more volatile compared to SQSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check SQSP's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, NEWR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while NEWR trades at $86.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas NEWR's P/E ratio is -41.62. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to NEWR's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, S is more volatile compared to NEWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check NEWR's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CCCS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while CCCS trades at $8.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas CCCS's P/E ratio is -875.00. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to CCCS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, S is less volatile compared to CCCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check CCCS's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PATH has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while PATH trades at $10.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas PATH's P/E ratio is 24.21. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to PATH's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, S is less volatile compared to PATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check PATH's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, DOCN has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while DOCN trades at $59.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas DOCN's P/E ratio is 23.71. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to DOCN's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, S is less volatile compared to DOCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check DOCN's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CORZ has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while CORZ trades at $16.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas CORZ's P/E ratio is -7.51. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to CORZ's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, S is more volatile compared to CORZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check CORZ's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CORZZ has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while CORZZ trades at $16.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas CORZZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to CORZZ's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, S is more volatile compared to CORZZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check CORZZ's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, WEX has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while WEX trades at $151.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas WEX's P/E ratio is 17.91. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to WEX's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, S is less volatile compared to WEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check WEX's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, FOUR has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while FOUR trades at $57.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas FOUR's P/E ratio is 26.85. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to FOUR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, S is less volatile compared to FOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check FOUR's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, KVYO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while KVYO trades at $15.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas KVYO's P/E ratio is -144.36. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to KVYO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, S is less volatile compared to KVYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check KVYO's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, NVEI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while NVEI trades at $33.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas NVEI's P/E ratio is 212.44. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to NVEI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, S is more volatile compared to NVEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check NVEI's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, KLAR has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while KLAR trades at $12.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas KLAR's P/E ratio is -42.67. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to KLAR's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, S is less volatile compared to KLAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check KLAR's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BLSH has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while BLSH trades at $30.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas BLSH's P/E ratio is -4.98. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to BLSH's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, S is more volatile compared to BLSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check BLSH's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, STNE has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while STNE trades at $16.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas STNE's P/E ratio is -26.87. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to STNE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, S is less volatile compared to STNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check STNE's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ACIW has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while ACIW trades at $38.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas ACIW's P/E ratio is 15.57. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to ACIW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, S is less volatile compared to ACIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check ACIW's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ESMT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while ESMT trades at $23.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas ESMT's P/E ratio is 153.67. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to ESMT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, S is more volatile compared to ESMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check ESMT's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, DLO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while DLO trades at $12.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas DLO's P/E ratio is 22.16. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to DLO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, S is less volatile compared to DLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check DLO's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, WIX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while WIX trades at $62.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas WIX's P/E ratio is 26.61. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to WIX's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, S is less volatile compared to WIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check WIX's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, RELY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while RELY trades at $16.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas RELY's P/E ratio is 181.11. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to RELY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, S is less volatile compared to RELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check RELY's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CORZW has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while CORZW trades at $10.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas CORZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to CORZW's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, S is less volatile compared to CORZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check CORZW's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SWI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while SWI trades at $18.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas SWI's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SWI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, S is more volatile compared to SWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check SWI's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PAGS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while PAGS trades at $10.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas PAGS's P/E ratio is 7.56. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to PAGS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, S is less volatile compared to PAGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check PAGS's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, QLYS has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while QLYS trades at $86.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas QLYS's P/E ratio is 15.93. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to QLYS's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, S is less volatile compared to QLYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check QLYS's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while BOX trades at $21.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 17.46. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to BOX's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, S is less volatile compared to BOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check BOX's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CCC has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while CCC trades at $4.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas CCC's P/E ratio is -487.00. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to CCC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, S is less volatile compared to CCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check CCC's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, EVOP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while EVOP trades at $33.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas EVOP's P/E ratio is -309.00. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to EVOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, S is more volatile compared to EVOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check EVOP's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, EEFT has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while EEFT trades at $70.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas EEFT's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to EEFT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, S is more volatile compared to EEFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check EEFT's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CLBT has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while CLBT trades at $11.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas CLBT's P/E ratio is 38.52. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to CLBT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, S is less volatile compared to CLBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check CLBT's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, TDC has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while TDC trades at $28.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas TDC's P/E ratio is 20.81. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to TDC's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, S is less volatile compared to TDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check TDC's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, VRNS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while VRNS trades at $21.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas VRNS's P/E ratio is -18.65. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to VRNS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, S is less volatile compared to VRNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check VRNS's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CSGS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while CSGS trades at $79.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas CSGS's P/E ratio is 40.25. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to CSGS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, S is more volatile compared to CSGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check CSGS's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, AVPT has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while AVPT trades at $9.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas AVPT's P/E ratio is -995.00. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to AVPT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, S is less volatile compared to AVPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check AVPT's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, WRD has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while WRD trades at $7.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas WRD's P/E ratio is -9.41. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to WRD's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, S is less volatile compared to WRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check WRD's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, TENB has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while TENB trades at $17.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas TENB's P/E ratio is -58.50. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to TENB's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, S is less volatile compared to TENB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check TENB's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, AVDX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while AVDX trades at $10.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas AVDX's P/E ratio is -250.00. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to AVDX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, S is more volatile compared to AVDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check AVDX's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, GETVV has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while GETVV trades at $2.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas GETVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to GETVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, S is less volatile compared to GETVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check GETVV's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SPSC has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while SPSC trades at $54.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas SPSC's P/E ratio is 22.04. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SPSC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, S is less volatile compared to SPSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check SPSC's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, NTCT has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while NTCT trades at $28.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas NTCT's P/E ratio is 21.27. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to NTCT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, S is less volatile compared to NTCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check NTCT's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PICS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while PICS trades at $15.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas PICS's P/E ratio is 31.22. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to PICS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, S is less volatile compared to PICS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check PICS's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BB has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while BB trades at $3.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas BB's P/E ratio is 82.88. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to BB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, S is more volatile compared to BB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check BB's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, FORG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while FORG trades at $23.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas FORG's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to FORG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, S is less volatile compared to FORG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check FORG's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, GSKY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while GSKY trades at $10.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas GSKY's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to GSKY's ROE of +5.47%. Regarding short-term risk, S is more volatile compared to GSKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check GSKY's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MQ has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while MQ trades at $4.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas MQ's P/E ratio is -45.44. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to MQ's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, S is less volatile compared to MQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check MQ's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, EVCM has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while EVCM trades at $10.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas EVCM's P/E ratio is -125.75. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to EVCM's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, S is more volatile compared to EVCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check EVCM's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, APPN has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while APPN trades at $24.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas APPN's P/E ratio is -242.50. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to APPN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, S is less volatile compared to APPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check APPN's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PAYO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while PAYO trades at $4.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas PAYO's P/E ratio is 27.44. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to PAYO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, S is less volatile compared to PAYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check PAYO's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, GET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while GET trades at $1.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas GET's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to GET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, S is more volatile compared to GET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check GET's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ODD has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while ODD trades at $29.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas ODD's P/E ratio is 16.43. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to ODD's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, S is less volatile compared to ODD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check ODD's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, EVTC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while EVTC trades at $25.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas EVTC's P/E ratio is 11.41. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to EVTC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, S is less volatile compared to EVTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check EVTC's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, STER has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while STER trades at $16.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas STER's P/E ratio is -98.47. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to STER's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, S is more volatile compared to STER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check STER's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, RAMP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while RAMP trades at $24.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas RAMP's P/E ratio is 23.57. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to RAMP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, S is more volatile compared to RAMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check RAMP's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ZUO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while ZUO trades at $10.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas ZUO's P/E ratio is -19.65. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to ZUO's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, S is more volatile compared to ZUO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check ZUO's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SUMO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while SUMO trades at $12.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas SUMO's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SUMO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, S is more volatile compared to SUMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check SUMO's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, GB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while GB trades at $7.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas GB's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to GB's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, S is more volatile compared to GB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check GB's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, TUYA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while TUYA trades at $2.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas TUYA's P/E ratio is 29.06. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to TUYA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, S is less volatile compared to TUYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check TUYA's competition here

S plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, S stands at 4.1B. In comparison, FIVN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, S is priced at $12.37, while FIVN trades at $17.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

S currently has a P/E ratio of -9.82, whereas FIVN's P/E ratio is 46.68. In terms of profitability, S's ROE is -0.26%, compared to FIVN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, S is less volatile compared to FIVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for S.Check FIVN's competition here