Rumble Inc.

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 328.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while SAP trades at $282.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 43.17. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check SAP's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 258.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while CRM trades at $270.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 42.35. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check CRM's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 222.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while INTU trades at $798.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 65.15. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check INTU's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 204.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while NOW trades at $985.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 124.08. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check NOW's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 189.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while UBER trades at $90.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 15.86. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check UBER's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 164.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while SHOP trades at $126.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 103.12. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check SHOP's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 125.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while APP trades at $370.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 67.07. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check APP's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 114.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while MSTR trades at $403.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -18.16. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check MSTR's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 110.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while STRK trades at $104.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check STRK's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 91.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while CDNS trades at $333.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 84.48. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check CDNS's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 73B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while SNOW trades at $218.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is -52.19. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check SNOW's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 65.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while ADSK trades at $304.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 65.22. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check ADSK's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 63.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while WDAY trades at $238.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 132.98. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check WDAY's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 53.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while TEAM trades at $201.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is -123.07. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check TEAM's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 52.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while DDOG trades at $150.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 327.76. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check DDOG's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, TTD has a market cap of 43.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while TTD trades at $88.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas TTD's P/E ratio is 107.88. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to TTD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to TTD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check TTD's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while FICO trades at $1,513.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 65.02. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check FICO's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while ANSS trades at $374.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 55.70. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check ANSS's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while HUBS trades at $559.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is -1243.51. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to HUBS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check HUBS's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while STRF trades at $112.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check STRF's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while PTC trades at $204.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 56.04. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check PTC's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while TYL trades at $556.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 84.06. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check TYL's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while ZM trades at $75.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 22.64. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check ZM's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while SSNC trades at $85.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 26.87. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check SSNC's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while GRAB trades at $5.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 528.00. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check GRAB's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while GWRE trades at $227.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 540.93. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check GWRE's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while BSY trades at $58.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 75.28. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check BSY's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while AZPN trades at $264.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to AZPN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check AZPN's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while DT trades at $54.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 34.41. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check DT's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while DOCU trades at $80.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 15.28. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check DOCU's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while DUOL trades at $340.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 166.88. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is less volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check DUOL's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, QXO has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while QXO trades at $21.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas QXO's P/E ratio is -62.24. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to QXO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to QXO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check QXO's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while MNDY trades at $284.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 286.93. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check MNDY's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, U has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while U trades at $33.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas U's P/E ratio is -29.91. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to U's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check U's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while PAYC trades at $236.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 33.69. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check PAYC's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while MANH trades at $221.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 62.04. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check MANH's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while BKI trades at $75.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check BKI's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while PCOR trades at $76.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is -89.19. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check PCOR's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while XM trades at $18.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check XM's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while CDAY trades at $69.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to CDAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check CDAY's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while NICE trades at $170.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 23.79. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check NICE's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while TTAN trades at $117.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is -31.71. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check TTAN's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while PCTY trades at $186.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 46.57. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check PCTY's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while PEGA trades at $59.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 49.14. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check PEGA's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while DAY trades at $58.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is 368.56. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to DAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check DAY's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while APPF trades at $260.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 48.51. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check APPF's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while ESTC trades at $88.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is -85.50. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to ESTC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check ESTC's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while DSGX trades at $106.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 64.72. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check DSGX's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while SRAD trades at $28.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 139.95. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check SRAD's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while GTLB trades at $48.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is 537.56. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to GTLB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check GTLB's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while NATI trades at $59.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check NATI's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while SMAR trades at $56.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check SMAR's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while OTEX trades at $30.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 12.34. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check OTEX's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while BULL trades at $15.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is 12.68. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to BULL's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check BULL's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while CVLT trades at $163.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 97.28. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check CVLT's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while COUP trades at $80.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check COUP's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while CWAN trades at $21.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to CWAN's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check CWAN's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while LYFT trades at $14.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 94.40. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check LYFT's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while LIF trades at $76.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 585.92. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to LIF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check LIF's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while IDCC trades at $222.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is less volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check IDCC's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while QTWO trades at $90.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is -267.06. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to QTWO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check QTWO's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, VERX has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while VERX trades at $33.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas VERX's P/E ratio is -116.90. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to VERX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to VERX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check VERX's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, RIOT has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while RIOT trades at $14.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas RIOT's P/E ratio is -10.59. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to RIOT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to RIOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check RIOT's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while FROG trades at $42.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is -60.07. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check FROG's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while BILL trades at $46.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is -2303.50. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check BILL's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, SOUN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while SOUN trades at $11.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas SOUN's P/E ratio is -18.43. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to SOUN's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is less volatile compared to SOUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check SOUN's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while CVT trades at $8.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check CVT's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, FRSH has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while FRSH trades at $14.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas FRSH's P/E ratio is -58.33. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to FRSH's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to FRSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check FRSH's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while PYCR trades at $22.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check PYCR's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, RUMBW has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while RUMBW trades at $2.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas RUMBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to RUMBW's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to RUMBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check RUMBW's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while COMP trades at $7.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is -56.54. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to COMP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check COMP's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while WK trades at $68.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas WK's P/E ratio is -59.04. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to WK's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to WK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check WK's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while PWSC trades at $22.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check PWSC's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while ZETA trades at $16.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is -64.30. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check ZETA's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while ZI trades at $10.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 85.92. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is less volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check ZI's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ETWO-WT has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while ETWO-WT trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas ETWO-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to ETWO-WT's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to ETWO-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check ETWO-WT's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, CALX has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while CALX trades at $56.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas CALX's P/E ratio is -137.73. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to CALX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to CALX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check CALX's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ASAN has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while ASAN trades at $15.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas ASAN's P/E ratio is -15.04. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to ASAN's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to ASAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check ASAN's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while AYX trades at $48.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check AYX's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, NCNO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while NCNO trades at $30.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas NCNO's P/E ratio is -121.44. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to NCNO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to NCNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check NCNO's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, GRND has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while GRND trades at $17.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas GRND's P/E ratio is -29.77. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to GRND's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to GRND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check GRND's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while ENV trades at $63.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check ENV's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, BL has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while BL trades at $55.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas BL's P/E ratio is 40.36. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to BL's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to BL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check BL's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while INST trades at $23.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check INST's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, CLSK has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while CLSK trades at $12.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas CLSK's P/E ratio is -10.84. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to CLSK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to CLSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check CLSK's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, INTA has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while INTA trades at $41.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas INTA's P/E ratio is -171.50. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to INTA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to INTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check INTA's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, AGYS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while AGYS trades at $117.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas AGYS's P/E ratio is 240.73. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to AGYS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to AGYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check AGYS's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, BRZE has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while BRZE trades at $29.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas BRZE's P/E ratio is -29.49. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to BRZE's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to BRZE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check BRZE's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while GBTG trades at $6.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is -67.05. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to GBTG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check GBTG's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, BLKB has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while BLKB trades at $64.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas BLKB's P/E ratio is -11.44. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to BLKB's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to BLKB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check BLKB's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ALIT has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while ALIT trades at $5.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas ALIT's P/E ratio is -94.67. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to ALIT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to ALIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check ALIT's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ALKT has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while ALKT trades at $28.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas ALKT's P/E ratio is -76.22. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to ALKT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to ALKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check ALKT's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while DAVE trades at $213.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 59.87. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check DAVE's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, DAVEW has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while DAVEW trades at $1.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas DAVEW's P/E ratio is -7.14. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to DAVEW's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is less volatile compared to DAVEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check DAVEW's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, BTDR has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while BTDR trades at $14.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas BTDR's P/E ratio is -2.99. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to BTDR's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is less volatile compared to BTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check BTDR's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, YOU has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while YOU trades at $30.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas YOU's P/E ratio is 18.59. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to YOU's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to YOU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check YOU's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ALRM has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while ALRM trades at $55.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas ALRM's P/E ratio is 23.57. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to ALRM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to ALRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check ALRM's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, PAR has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while PAR trades at $67.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas PAR's P/E ratio is -26.65. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to PAR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to PAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check PAR's competition here

RUM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RUM stands at 3.9B. In comparison, DV has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RUM is priced at $9.08, while DV trades at $15.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RUM currently has a P/E ratio of -6.22, whereas DV's P/E ratio is 55.12. In terms of profitability, RUM's ROE is -1.87%, compared to DV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RUM is more volatile compared to DV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUM.Check DV's competition here