PDF Solutions, Inc.
PDF Solutions, Inc. (PDFS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PDFS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PDFS | $23.25 | -4.04% | 910M | 775.00 | $0.03 | N/A |
| SAP | $290.50 | +1.03% | 338.6B | 44.52 | $6.53 | +0.91% |
| CRM | $264.81 | -0.96% | 253.3B | 41.53 | $6.38 | +0.62% |
| INTU | $807.39 | +0.13% | 225.2B | 65.86 | $12.26 | +0.52% |
| NOW | $977.48 | -1.58% | 203.4B | 122.52 | $7.98 | N/A |
| UBER | $87.64 | +0.61% | 183.3B | 15.35 | $5.71 | N/A |
| SHOP | $123.01 | -1.47% | 159.6B | 99.20 | $1.24 | N/A |
| APP | $363.31 | +0.46% | 122.9B | 65.70 | $5.53 | N/A |
| MSTR | $395.04 | +0.10% | 112.1B | -17.75 | -$22.26 | N/A |
| STRK | $104.57 | -2.25% | 108.1B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
PDFS vs SAP Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 338.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while SAP trades at $290.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 44.52. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check SAP's competition here
PDFS vs CRM Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 253.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while CRM trades at $264.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 41.53. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check CRM's competition here
PDFS vs INTU Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 225.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while INTU trades at $807.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 65.86. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check INTU's competition here
PDFS vs NOW Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 203.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while NOW trades at $977.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 122.52. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check NOW's competition here
PDFS vs UBER Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 183.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while UBER trades at $87.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 15.35. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check UBER's competition here
PDFS vs SHOP Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 159.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while SHOP trades at $123.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 99.20. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check SHOP's competition here
PDFS vs APP Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 122.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while APP trades at $363.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 65.70. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check APP's competition here
PDFS vs MSTR Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 112.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while MSTR trades at $395.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -17.75. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check MSTR's competition here
PDFS vs STRK Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 108.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while STRK trades at $104.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check STRK's competition here
PDFS vs CDNS Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 101.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while CDNS trades at $371.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 100.28. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check CDNS's competition here
PDFS vs SNOW Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 73.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while SNOW trades at $220.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is -52.45. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check SNOW's competition here
PDFS vs ADSK Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 65.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while ADSK trades at $308.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 66.12. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check ADSK's competition here
PDFS vs WDAY Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 63.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while WDAY trades at $237.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 132.05. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check WDAY's competition here
PDFS vs TEAM Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 51.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while TEAM trades at $197.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is -120.24. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check TEAM's competition here
PDFS vs DDOG Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 51.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while DDOG trades at $148.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 316.77. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check DDOG's competition here
PDFS vs TTD Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, TTD has a market cap of 42.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while TTD trades at $86.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas TTD's P/E ratio is 105.39. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TTD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to TTD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check TTD's competition here
PDFS vs FICO Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 37.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while FICO trades at $1,527.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 66.06. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check FICO's competition here
PDFS vs ANSS Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while ANSS trades at $374.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 55.70. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check ANSS's competition here
PDFS vs STRF Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while STRF trades at $117.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check STRF's competition here
PDFS vs HUBS Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while HUBS trades at $538.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is -1223.38. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HUBS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check HUBS's competition here
PDFS vs PTC Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while PTC trades at $202.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 55.63. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check PTC's competition here
PDFS vs TYL Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while TYL trades at $554.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 83.66. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check TYL's competition here
PDFS vs ZM Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while ZM trades at $74.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 22.29. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check ZM's competition here
PDFS vs SSNC Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while SSNC trades at $85.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 26.95. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check SSNC's competition here
PDFS vs GRAB Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while GRAB trades at $5.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 529.00. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check GRAB's competition here
PDFS vs GWRE Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while GWRE trades at $225.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 550.98. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check GWRE's competition here
PDFS vs BSY Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while BSY trades at $58.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 74.49. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check BSY's competition here
PDFS vs AZPN Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while AZPN trades at $264.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AZPN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check AZPN's competition here
PDFS vs DT Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while DT trades at $53.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 33.92. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check DT's competition here
PDFS vs DOCU Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while DOCU trades at $77.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 14.82. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check DOCU's competition here
PDFS vs DUOL Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while DUOL trades at $341.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 167.32. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check DUOL's competition here
PDFS vs MNDY Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while MNDY trades at $277.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 280.54. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check MNDY's competition here
PDFS vs QXO Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, QXO has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while QXO trades at $20.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas QXO's P/E ratio is -59.03. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to QXO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to QXO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check QXO's competition here
PDFS vs MANH Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while MANH trades at $227.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 63.67. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check MANH's competition here
PDFS vs U Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, U has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while U trades at $32.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas U's P/E ratio is -29.45. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to U's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check U's competition here
PDFS vs PAYC Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while PAYC trades at $235.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 33.52. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check PAYC's competition here
PDFS vs BKI Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while BKI trades at $75.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check BKI's competition here
PDFS vs PCOR Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while PCOR trades at $74.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is -86.58. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check PCOR's competition here
PDFS vs XM Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while XM trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check XM's competition here
PDFS vs CDAY Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while CDAY trades at $69.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CDAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check CDAY's competition here
PDFS vs TTAN Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while TTAN trades at $116.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is -31.40. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check TTAN's competition here
PDFS vs PCTY Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while PCTY trades at $186.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 46.95. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check PCTY's competition here
PDFS vs PEGA Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while PEGA trades at $59.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 49.45. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check PEGA's competition here
PDFS vs NICE Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while NICE trades at $161.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 22.47. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check NICE's competition here
PDFS vs DAY Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while DAY trades at $59.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is 368.94. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check DAY's competition here
PDFS vs APPF Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while APPF trades at $259.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 48.27. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check APPF's competition here
PDFS vs ESTC Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while ESTC trades at $87.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is -84.59. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ESTC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check ESTC's competition here
PDFS vs DSGX Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while DSGX trades at $106.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 64.70. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check DSGX's competition here
PDFS vs SRAD Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while SRAD trades at $29.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 146.65. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check SRAD's competition here
PDFS vs CVLT Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while CVLT trades at $193.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 107.43. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is less volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check CVLT's competition here
PDFS vs NATI Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while NATI trades at $59.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check NATI's competition here
PDFS vs SMAR Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while SMAR trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check SMAR's competition here
PDFS vs OTEX Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while OTEX trades at $29.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 12.24. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check OTEX's competition here
PDFS vs GTLB Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while GTLB trades at $46.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is 513.00. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GTLB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check GTLB's competition here
PDFS vs BULL Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while BULL trades at $13.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BULL's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check BULL's competition here
PDFS vs IDCC Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while IDCC trades at $245.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 19.40. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is less volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check IDCC's competition here
PDFS vs COUP Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while COUP trades at $80.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check COUP's competition here
PDFS vs CWAN Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while CWAN trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CWAN's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check CWAN's competition here
PDFS vs LIF Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while LIF trades at $76.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 587.69. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LIF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check LIF's competition here
PDFS vs LYFT Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while LYFT trades at $14.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 93.47. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check LYFT's competition here
PDFS vs QTWO Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while QTWO trades at $89.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is -264.71. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to QTWO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check QTWO's competition here
PDFS vs VERX Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, VERX has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while VERX trades at $33.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas VERX's P/E ratio is -117.07. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VERX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to VERX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check VERX's competition here
PDFS vs FROG Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while FROG trades at $45.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is -63.58. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is less volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check FROG's competition here
PDFS vs RIOT Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, RIOT has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while RIOT trades at $13.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas RIOT's P/E ratio is -9.87. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RIOT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is less volatile compared to RIOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check RIOT's competition here
PDFS vs BILL Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while BILL trades at $45.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is -2265.00. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check BILL's competition here
PDFS vs CVT Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while CVT trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check CVT's competition here
PDFS vs SOUN Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, SOUN has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while SOUN trades at $10.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas SOUN's P/E ratio is -17.03. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SOUN's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to SOUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check SOUN's competition here
PDFS vs PYCR Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while PYCR trades at $22.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check PYCR's competition here
PDFS vs FRSH Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, FRSH has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while FRSH trades at $13.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas FRSH's P/E ratio is -75.39. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FRSH's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is less volatile compared to FRSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check FRSH's competition here
PDFS vs ETWO-WT Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, ETWO-WT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while ETWO-WT trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas ETWO-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ETWO-WT's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to ETWO-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check ETWO-WT's competition here
PDFS vs PWSC Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while PWSC trades at $22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check PWSC's competition here
PDFS vs COMP Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while COMP trades at $7.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is -55.77. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to COMP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check COMP's competition here
PDFS vs ZI Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while ZI trades at $10.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 85.92. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is less volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check ZI's competition here
PDFS vs CALX Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, CALX has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while CALX trades at $56.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas CALX's P/E ratio is -138.66. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CALX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to CALX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check CALX's competition here
PDFS vs WK Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while WK trades at $66.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas WK's P/E ratio is -57.33. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WK's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to WK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check WK's competition here
PDFS vs RUM Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while RUM trades at $8.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -5.76. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RUM's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to RUM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check RUM's competition here
PDFS vs ZETA Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while ZETA trades at $15.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is -62.26. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check ZETA's competition here
PDFS vs RUMBW Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, RUMBW has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while RUMBW trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas RUMBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RUMBW's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is less volatile compared to RUMBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check RUMBW's competition here
PDFS vs ASAN Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, ASAN has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while ASAN trades at $15.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas ASAN's P/E ratio is -15.35. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ASAN's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to ASAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check ASAN's competition here
PDFS vs AYX Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while AYX trades at $48.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check AYX's competition here
PDFS vs GRND Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, GRND has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while GRND trades at $17.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas GRND's P/E ratio is -29.80. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GRND's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to GRND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check GRND's competition here
PDFS vs ENV Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while ENV trades at $63.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check ENV's competition here
PDFS vs BLKB Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, BLKB has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while BLKB trades at $71.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas BLKB's P/E ratio is -12.79. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BLKB's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is less volatile compared to BLKB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check BLKB's competition here
PDFS vs INST Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while INST trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check INST's competition here
PDFS vs BL Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, BL has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while BL trades at $55.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas BL's P/E ratio is 39.96. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BL's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to BL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check BL's competition here
PDFS vs NCNO Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, NCNO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while NCNO trades at $29.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas NCNO's P/E ratio is -117.28. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NCNO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to NCNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check NCNO's competition here
PDFS vs INTA Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, INTA has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while INTA trades at $41.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas INTA's P/E ratio is -171.00. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to INTA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to INTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check INTA's competition here
PDFS vs AGYS Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, AGYS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while AGYS trades at $116.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas AGYS's P/E ratio is 243.50. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AGYS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to AGYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check AGYS's competition here
PDFS vs DAVEW Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, DAVEW has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while DAVEW trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas DAVEW's P/E ratio is -8.25. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DAVEW's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is less volatile compared to DAVEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check DAVEW's competition here
PDFS vs CLSK Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, CLSK has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while CLSK trades at $11.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas CLSK's P/E ratio is -10.29. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CLSK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is less volatile compared to CLSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check CLSK's competition here
PDFS vs DAVE Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while DAVE trades at $240.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 67.66. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is less volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check DAVE's competition here
PDFS vs GBTG Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while GBTG trades at $6.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is -66.75. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GBTG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check GBTG's competition here
PDFS vs BRZE Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, BRZE has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while BRZE trades at $28.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas BRZE's P/E ratio is -28.38. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BRZE's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to BRZE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check BRZE's competition here
PDFS vs ALIT Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, ALIT has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while ALIT trades at $5.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas ALIT's P/E ratio is -89.83. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ALIT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to ALIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check ALIT's competition here
PDFS vs ALRM Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, ALRM has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while ALRM trades at $55.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas ALRM's P/E ratio is 23.56. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ALRM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to ALRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check ALRM's competition here
PDFS vs YOU Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, YOU has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while YOU trades at $29.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas YOU's P/E ratio is 18.37. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to YOU's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to YOU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check YOU's competition here
PDFS vs ALKT Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, ALKT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while ALKT trades at $26.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas ALKT's P/E ratio is -70.70. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ALKT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to ALKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check ALKT's competition here
PDFS vs BTDR Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, BTDR has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while BTDR trades at $13.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas BTDR's P/E ratio is -2.76. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BTDR's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is less volatile compared to BTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check BTDR's competition here
PDFS vs DV Comparison July 2025
PDFS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PDFS stands at 910M. In comparison, DV has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PDFS is priced at $23.25, while DV trades at $15.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PDFS currently has a P/E ratio of 775.00, whereas DV's P/E ratio is 53.64. In terms of profitability, PDFS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PDFS is more volatile compared to DV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PDFS.Check DV's competition here