UiPath Inc.
UiPath Inc. PATH Peers
See (PATH) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PATH | $12.62 | -5.36% | 6.9B | -107.37 | -$0.12 | N/A |
| MSFT | $504.12 | +0.12% | 3.7T | 38.70 | $12.96 | +0.80% |
| ORCL | $231.37 | -1.88% | 660.1B | 54.15 | $4.34 | +0.93% |
| PLTR | $143.52 | +0.27% | 322.5B | 593.75 | $0.24 | N/A |
| ADBE | $364.36 | -2.42% | 157.6B | 23.76 | $15.63 | N/A |
| PANW | $188.11 | -8.71% | 128.1B | 110.39 | $1.74 | N/A |
| CRWD | $482.26 | -6.09% | 121.4B | -705.81 | -$0.69 | N/A |
| SNPS | $566.13 | +2.76% | 87.9B | 65.46 | $8.65 | N/A |
| HOOD | $100.77 | +6.58% | 87.1B | 56.41 | $1.75 | N/A |
| FTNT | $100.21 | -6.91% | 76.7B | 41.24 | $2.43 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
PATH vs MSFT Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, MSFT has a market cap of 3.7T. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while MSFT trades at $504.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas MSFT's P/E ratio is 38.70. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MSFT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to MSFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs ORCL Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, ORCL has a market cap of 660.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while ORCL trades at $231.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas ORCL's P/E ratio is 54.15. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ORCL's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to ORCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs PLTR Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, PLTR has a market cap of 322.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while PLTR trades at $143.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas PLTR's P/E ratio is 593.75. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PLTR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to PLTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs ADBE Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 157.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while ADBE trades at $364.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 23.76. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs PANW Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, PANW has a market cap of 128.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while PANW trades at $188.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas PANW's P/E ratio is 110.39. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PANW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is less volatile compared to PANW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs CRWD Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, CRWD has a market cap of 121.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while CRWD trades at $482.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas CRWD's P/E ratio is -705.81. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CRWD's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to CRWD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs SNPS Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, SNPS has a market cap of 87.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while SNPS trades at $566.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas SNPS's P/E ratio is 65.46. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SNPS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to SNPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs HOOD Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, HOOD has a market cap of 87.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while HOOD trades at $100.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas HOOD's P/E ratio is 56.41. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to HOOD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is less volatile compared to HOOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs FTNT Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, FTNT has a market cap of 76.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while FTNT trades at $100.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas FTNT's P/E ratio is 41.24. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FTNT's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to FTNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs CRWV Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, CRWV has a market cap of 66.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while CRWV trades at $128.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas CRWV's P/E ratio is -54.63. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CRWV's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is less volatile compared to CRWV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs NET Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, NET has a market cap of 63B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while NET trades at $182.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas NET's P/E ratio is -790.57. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NET's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to NET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs VMW Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, VMW has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while VMW trades at $142.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas VMW's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to VMW's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to VMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs SQ Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, SQ has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while SQ trades at $83.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas SQ's P/E ratio is 49.98. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SQ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to SQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs ZS Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, ZS has a market cap of 46.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while ZS trades at $293.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas ZS's P/E ratio is -1184.72. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ZS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to ZS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs XYZ Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, XYZ has a market cap of 42.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while XYZ trades at $67.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas XYZ's P/E ratio is 16.69. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to XYZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to XYZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs NETE Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, NETE has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while NETE trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas NETE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NETE's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is less volatile compared to NETE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs VRSN Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, VRSN has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while VRSN trades at $282.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas VRSN's P/E ratio is 34.88. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to VRSN's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to VRSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs SPLK Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, SPLK has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while SPLK trades at $156.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas SPLK's P/E ratio is 103.22. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SPLK's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to SPLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs TOST Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, TOST has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while TOST trades at $43.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas TOST's P/E ratio is 163.98. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TOST's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to TOST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs GDDY Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, GDDY has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while GDDY trades at $168.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas GDDY's P/E ratio is 32.83. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GDDY's ROE of +2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to GDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs CHKP Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, CHKP has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while CHKP trades at $216.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas CHKP's P/E ratio is 29.24. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CHKP's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is less volatile compared to CHKP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs CPAY Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, CPAY has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while CPAY trades at $328.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas CPAY's P/E ratio is 23.55. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CPAY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to CPAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs AFRM Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, AFRM has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while AFRM trades at $69.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas AFRM's P/E ratio is -360.74. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AFRM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is less volatile compared to AFRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs FLT Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, FLT has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while FLT trades at $303.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas FLT's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FLT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to FLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs IOT Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, IOT has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while IOT trades at $37.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas IOT's P/E ratio is -171.36. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to IOT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is less volatile compared to IOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs NTNX Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, NTNX has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while NTNX trades at $72.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas NTNX's P/E ratio is -283.00. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NTNX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to NTNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs CYBR Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, CYBR has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while CYBR trades at $374.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas CYBR's P/E ratio is -185.41. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CYBR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is less volatile compared to CYBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs GEN Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, GEN has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while GEN trades at $29.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas GEN's P/E ratio is 28.81. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GEN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to GEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs FFIV Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, FFIV has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while FFIV trades at $293.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas FFIV's P/E ratio is 28.51. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FFIV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is less volatile compared to FFIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs MDB Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, MDB has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while MDB trades at $206.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas MDB's P/E ratio is -192.07. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MDB's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to MDB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs RBRK Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, RBRK has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while RBRK trades at $85.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas RBRK's P/E ratio is 24.82. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to RBRK's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is less volatile compared to RBRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs KSPI Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, KSPI has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while KSPI trades at $81.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas KSPI's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to KSPI's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is less volatile compared to KSPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs OKTA Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, OKTA has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while OKTA trades at $93.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas OKTA's P/E ratio is 145.29. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to OKTA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to OKTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs NLOK Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, NLOK has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while NLOK trades at $21.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas NLOK's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NLOK's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is less volatile compared to NLOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs SAIL Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, SAIL has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while SAIL trades at $20.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas SAIL's P/E ratio is -12.83. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SAIL's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to SAIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs AKAM Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, AKAM has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while AKAM trades at $77.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas AKAM's P/E ratio is 26.65. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AKAM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to AKAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs DOX Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, DOX has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while DOX trades at $88.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas DOX's P/E ratio is 18.59. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DOX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to DOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs ALTR Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, ALTR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while ALTR trades at $111.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas ALTR's P/E ratio is 699.06. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ALTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to ALTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs PLAN Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, PLAN has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while PLAN trades at $63.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas PLAN's P/E ratio is -44.82. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PLAN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to PLAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs FOUR Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, FOUR has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while FOUR trades at $101.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas FOUR's P/E ratio is 35.51. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FOUR's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to FOUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs KVYO Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, KVYO has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while KVYO trades at $31.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas KVYO's P/E ratio is -191.24. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to KVYO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is less volatile compared to KVYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs WIX Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, WIX has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while WIX trades at $151.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas WIX's P/E ratio is 61.88. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to WIX's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is less volatile compared to WIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs INFA Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, INFA has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while INFA trades at $24.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas INFA's P/E ratio is 809.50. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to INFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to INFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs CFLT Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, CFLT has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while CFLT trades at $24.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas CFLT's P/E ratio is -25.26. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CFLT's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to CFLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs DBX Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, DBX has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while DBX trades at $26.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas DBX's P/E ratio is 17.97. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DBX's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is less volatile compared to DBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs HCP Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, HCP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while HCP trades at $34.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas HCP's P/E ratio is -57.97. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to HCP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to HCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs JCOM Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, JCOM has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while JCOM trades at $142.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas JCOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to JCOM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is less volatile compared to JCOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs SQSP Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, SQSP has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while SQSP trades at $46.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas SQSP's P/E ratio is -1164.25. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SQSP's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to SQSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs CCCS Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, CCCS has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while CCCS trades at $9.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas CCCS's P/E ratio is 975.50. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CCCS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to CCCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs NEWR Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, NEWR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while NEWR trades at $86.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas NEWR's P/E ratio is -41.62. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NEWR's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to NEWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs VRNS Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, VRNS has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while VRNS trades at $49.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas VRNS's P/E ratio is -63.46. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to VRNS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is less volatile compared to VRNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs S Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, S has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while S trades at $17.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas S's P/E ratio is -13.58. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to S's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to S. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs WEX Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, WEX has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while WEX trades at $151.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas WEX's P/E ratio is 19.89. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to WEX's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to WEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs SPSC Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, SPSC has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while SPSC trades at $133.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas SPSC's P/E ratio is 63.28. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SPSC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to SPSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs QLYS Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, QLYS has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while QLYS trades at $137.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas QLYS's P/E ratio is 28.90. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to QLYS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is less volatile compared to QLYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs NVEI Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, NVEI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while NVEI trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas NVEI's P/E ratio is 212.44. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NVEI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to NVEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs BOX Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while BOX trades at $32.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 25.54. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BOX's ROE of +1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to BOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs ACIW Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, ACIW has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while ACIW trades at $44.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas ACIW's P/E ratio is 17.83. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ACIW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to ACIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs EEFT Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, EEFT has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while EEFT trades at $105.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas EEFT's P/E ratio is 15.92. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EEFT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to EEFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs TENB Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, TENB has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while TENB trades at $33.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas TENB's P/E ratio is -90.39. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TENB's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is less volatile compared to TENB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs ODD Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, ODD has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while ODD trades at $72.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas ODD's P/E ratio is 42.05. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ODD's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to ODD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs STNE Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, STNE has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while STNE trades at $15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas STNE's P/E ratio is -19.30. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to STNE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is less volatile compared to STNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs CORZZ Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, CORZZ has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while CORZZ trades at $12.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas CORZZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CORZZ's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is less volatile compared to CORZZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs CORZ Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, CORZ has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while CORZ trades at $12.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas CORZ's P/E ratio is -3.36. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CORZ's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is less volatile compared to CORZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs ESMT Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, ESMT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while ESMT trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas ESMT's P/E ratio is 153.67. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ESMT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to ESMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs RELY Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, RELY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while RELY trades at $17.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas RELY's P/E ratio is -609.33. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to RELY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is less volatile compared to RELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs AVPT Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, AVPT has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while AVPT trades at $18.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas AVPT's P/E ratio is -140.04. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AVPT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to AVPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs CLBT Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, CLBT has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while CLBT trades at $14.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas CLBT's P/E ratio is -16.05. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CLBT's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is less volatile compared to CLBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs DLO Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, DLO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while DLO trades at $11.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas DLO's P/E ratio is 23.73. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DLO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is less volatile compared to DLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs SWI Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, SWI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while SWI trades at $18.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas SWI's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SWI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to SWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs EVOP Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, EVOP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while EVOP trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas EVOP's P/E ratio is -309.00. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EVOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to EVOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs PAGS Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, PAGS has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while PAGS trades at $8.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas PAGS's P/E ratio is 7.35. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PAGS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is less volatile compared to PAGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs MQ Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, MQ has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while MQ trades at $5.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas MQ's P/E ratio is 60.00. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MQ's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to MQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs DOCN Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, DOCN has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while DOCN trades at $28.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas DOCN's P/E ratio is 25.69. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DOCN's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is less volatile compared to DOCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs WRD Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, WRD has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while WRD trades at $8.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas WRD's P/E ratio is -7.44. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to WRD's ROE of -1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to WRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs PAYO Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, PAYO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while PAYO trades at $6.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas PAYO's P/E ratio is 24.43. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PAYO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to PAYO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs BB Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, BB has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while BB trades at $4.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas BB's P/E ratio is 205.00. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BB's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is less volatile compared to BB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs APPN Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, APPN has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while APPN trades at $29.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas APPN's P/E ratio is -36.76. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to APPN's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is less volatile compared to APPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs EVTC Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, EVTC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while EVTC trades at $34.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas EVTC's P/E ratio is 17.70. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EVTC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is less volatile compared to EVTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs RAMP Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, RAMP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while RAMP trades at $32.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas RAMP's P/E ratio is -837.25. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to RAMP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is less volatile compared to RAMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs TDC Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, TDC has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while TDC trades at $21.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas TDC's P/E ratio is 15.81. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TDC's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to TDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs FIVN Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, FIVN has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while FIVN trades at $27.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas FIVN's P/E ratio is -464.50. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FIVN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is less volatile compared to FIVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs CORZW Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, CORZW has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while CORZW trades at $7.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas CORZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CORZW's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is less volatile compared to CORZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs GETVV Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, GETVV has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while GETVV trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas GETVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GETVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is less volatile compared to GETVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs AVDX Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, AVDX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while AVDX trades at $9.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas AVDX's P/E ratio is 246.25. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AVDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to AVDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs EVCM Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, EVCM has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while EVCM trades at $10.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas EVCM's P/E ratio is -90.42. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EVCM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to EVCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs FORG Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, FORG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while FORG trades at $23.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas FORG's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FORG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is less volatile compared to FORG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs GSKY Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, GSKY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while GSKY trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas GSKY's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GSKY's ROE of +5.47%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to GSKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs CSGS Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, CSGS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while CSGS trades at $62.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas CSGS's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CSGS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is less volatile compared to CSGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs PGY Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, PGY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while PGY trades at $23.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas PGY's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PGY's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is less volatile compared to PGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs GET Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, GET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while GET trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas GET's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is less volatile compared to GET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs STER Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, STER has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while STER trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas STER's P/E ratio is -98.47. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to STER's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to STER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs NTCT Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, NTCT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while NTCT trades at $22.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas NTCT's P/E ratio is -4.40. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NTCT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to NTCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs TUYA Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, TUYA has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while TUYA trades at $2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas TUYA's P/E ratio is 62.75. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TUYA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is less volatile compared to TUYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs RPD Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, RPD has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while RPD trades at $23.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas RPD's P/E ratio is 58.85. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to RPD's ROE of +9.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to RPD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs ZUO Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, ZUO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while ZUO trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas ZUO's P/E ratio is -19.65. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ZUO's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to ZUO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs SUMO Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, SUMO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while SUMO trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas SUMO's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SUMO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to SUMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs GB Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, GB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while GB trades at $7.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas GB's P/E ratio is 17.84. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GB's ROE of +0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to GB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.
PATH vs PGYWW Comparison
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 6.9B. In comparison, PGYWW has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $12.62, while PGYWW trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -107.37, whereas PGYWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PGYWW's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is less volatile compared to PGYWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.