UiPath Inc.
UiPath Inc. (PATH) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PATH) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PATH | $11.11 | -5.45% | 5.9B | -92.67 | -$0.12 | N/A |
| MSFT | $524.11 | -1.76% | 3.9T | 38.37 | $13.66 | +0.62% |
| ORCL | $244.42 | -3.68% | 686.6B | 56.33 | $4.34 | +0.73% |
| PLTR | $154.27 | -2.58% | 349.1B | 642.79 | $0.24 | N/A |
| ADBE | $347.80 | -2.76% | 147.5B | 22.27 | $15.62 | N/A |
| PANW | $172.88 | -0.41% | 115.3B | 99.36 | $1.74 | N/A |
| SNPS | $618.65 | -2.34% | 114.4B | 71.24 | $8.68 | N/A |
| CRWD | $446.66 | -1.74% | 111.3B | -647.33 | -$0.69 | N/A |
| HOOD | $99.90 | -3.06% | 88.4B | 50.71 | $1.97 | N/A |
| FTNT | $97.36 | -2.54% | 74.5B | 40.07 | $2.43 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
PATH vs MSFT Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, MSFT has a market cap of 3.9T. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while MSFT trades at $524.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas MSFT's P/E ratio is 38.37. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MSFT's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to MSFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check MSFT's competition here
PATH vs ORCL Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ORCL has a market cap of 686.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while ORCL trades at $244.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas ORCL's P/E ratio is 56.33. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ORCL's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to ORCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check ORCL's competition here
PATH vs PLTR Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, PLTR has a market cap of 349.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while PLTR trades at $154.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas PLTR's P/E ratio is 642.79. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PLTR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to PLTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check PLTR's competition here
PATH vs ADBE Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 147.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while ADBE trades at $347.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 22.27. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check ADBE's competition here
PATH vs PANW Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, PANW has a market cap of 115.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while PANW trades at $172.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas PANW's P/E ratio is 99.36. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PANW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to PANW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check PANW's competition here
PATH vs SNPS Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, SNPS has a market cap of 114.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while SNPS trades at $618.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas SNPS's P/E ratio is 71.24. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SNPS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to SNPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check SNPS's competition here
PATH vs CRWD Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, CRWD has a market cap of 111.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while CRWD trades at $446.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas CRWD's P/E ratio is -647.33. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CRWD's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to CRWD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check CRWD's competition here
PATH vs HOOD Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, HOOD has a market cap of 88.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while HOOD trades at $99.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas HOOD's P/E ratio is 50.71. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to HOOD's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is less volatile compared to HOOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check HOOD's competition here
PATH vs FTNT Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, FTNT has a market cap of 74.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while FTNT trades at $97.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas FTNT's P/E ratio is 40.07. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FTNT's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to FTNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check FTNT's competition here
PATH vs NET Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, NET has a market cap of 69.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while NET trades at $200.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas NET's P/E ratio is -606.70. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NET's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is less volatile compared to NET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check NET's competition here
PATH vs VMW Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, VMW has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while VMW trades at $142.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas VMW's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to VMW's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to VMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check VMW's competition here
PATH vs SQ Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, SQ has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while SQ trades at $83.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas SQ's P/E ratio is 49.98. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SQ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to SQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check SQ's competition here
PATH vs CRWV Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, CRWV has a market cap of 50.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while CRWV trades at $104.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas CRWV's P/E ratio is -41.16. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CRWV's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is less volatile compared to CRWV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check CRWV's competition here
PATH vs XYZ Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, XYZ has a market cap of 45.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while XYZ trades at $74.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas XYZ's P/E ratio is 17.96. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to XYZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to XYZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check XYZ's competition here
PATH vs ZS Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ZS has a market cap of 43.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while ZS trades at $280.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas ZS's P/E ratio is -1077.96. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ZS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to ZS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check ZS's competition here
PATH vs NETE Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, NETE has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while NETE trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas NETE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NETE's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is less volatile compared to NETE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check NETE's competition here
PATH vs TOST Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, TOST has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while TOST trades at $46.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas TOST's P/E ratio is 172.93. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TOST's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to TOST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check TOST's competition here
PATH vs SPLK Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, SPLK has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while SPLK trades at $156.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas SPLK's P/E ratio is 103.22. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SPLK's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to SPLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check SPLK's competition here
PATH vs VRSN Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, VRSN has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while VRSN trades at $265.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas VRSN's P/E ratio is 31.63. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to VRSN's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to VRSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check VRSN's competition here
PATH vs GDDY Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, GDDY has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while GDDY trades at $156.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas GDDY's P/E ratio is 30.15. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GDDY's ROE of +2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to GDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check GDDY's competition here
PATH vs CPAY Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, CPAY has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while CPAY trades at $316.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas CPAY's P/E ratio is 22.20. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CPAY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to CPAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check CPAY's competition here
PATH vs FLT Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, FLT has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while FLT trades at $303.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas FLT's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FLT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to FLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check FLT's competition here
PATH vs AFRM Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, AFRM has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while AFRM trades at $66.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas AFRM's P/E ratio is -349.53. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AFRM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is less volatile compared to AFRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check AFRM's competition here
PATH vs CYBR Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, CYBR has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while CYBR trades at $414.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas CYBR's P/E ratio is -116.94. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CYBR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to CYBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check CYBR's competition here
PATH vs IOT Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, IOT has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while IOT trades at $36.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas IOT's P/E ratio is -163.64. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to IOT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to IOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check IOT's competition here
PATH vs CHKP Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, CHKP has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while CHKP trades at $188.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas CHKP's P/E ratio is 24.59. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CHKP's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to CHKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check CHKP's competition here
PATH vs NTNX Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, NTNX has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while NTNX trades at $72.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas NTNX's P/E ratio is -277.35. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NTNX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to NTNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check NTNX's competition here
PATH vs MDB Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, MDB has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while MDB trades at $220.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas MDB's P/E ratio is -200.98. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MDB's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is less volatile compared to MDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check MDB's competition here
PATH vs GEN Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, GEN has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while GEN trades at $28.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas GEN's P/E ratio is 27.95. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GEN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to GEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check GEN's competition here
PATH vs FFIV Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, FFIV has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while FFIV trades at $307.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas FFIV's P/E ratio is 27.09. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FFIV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to FFIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check FFIV's competition here
PATH vs RBRK Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, RBRK has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while RBRK trades at $87.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas RBRK's P/E ratio is 25.28. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to RBRK's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is less volatile compared to RBRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check RBRK's competition here
PATH vs OKTA Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, OKTA has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while OKTA trades at $95.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas OKTA's P/E ratio is 146.35. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to OKTA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to OKTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check OKTA's competition here
PATH vs KSPI Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, KSPI has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while KSPI trades at $76.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas KSPI's P/E ratio is 7.43. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to KSPI's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to KSPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check KSPI's competition here
PATH vs NLOK Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, NLOK has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while NLOK trades at $21.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas NLOK's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NLOK's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is less volatile compared to NLOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check NLOK's competition here
PATH vs SAIL Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, SAIL has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while SAIL trades at $20.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas SAIL's P/E ratio is -12.65. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SAIL's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is less volatile compared to SAIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check SAIL's competition here
PATH vs AKAM Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, AKAM has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while AKAM trades at $74.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas AKAM's P/E ratio is 24.96. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AKAM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to AKAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check AKAM's competition here
PATH vs ALTR Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ALTR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while ALTR trades at $111.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas ALTR's P/E ratio is 699.06. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ALTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to ALTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check ALTR's competition here
PATH vs PLAN Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, PLAN has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while PLAN trades at $63.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas PLAN's P/E ratio is -44.82. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PLAN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to PLAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check PLAN's competition here
PATH vs DOX Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, DOX has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while DOX trades at $84.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas DOX's P/E ratio is 17.75. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DOX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to DOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check DOX's competition here
PATH vs FOUR Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, FOUR has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while FOUR trades at $101.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas FOUR's P/E ratio is 34.93. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FOUR's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to FOUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check FOUR's competition here
PATH vs INFA Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, INFA has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while INFA trades at $24.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas INFA's P/E ratio is 821.00. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to INFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to INFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check INFA's competition here
PATH vs KVYO Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, KVYO has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while KVYO trades at $29.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas KVYO's P/E ratio is -174.91. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to KVYO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to KVYO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check KVYO's competition here
PATH vs DBX Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, DBX has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while DBX trades at $26.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas DBX's P/E ratio is 17.41. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DBX's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to DBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check DBX's competition here
PATH vs WIX Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, WIX has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while WIX trades at $128.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas WIX's P/E ratio is 51.18. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to WIX's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to WIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check WIX's competition here
PATH vs HCP Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, HCP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while HCP trades at $34.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas HCP's P/E ratio is -57.97. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to HCP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to HCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check HCP's competition here
PATH vs JCOM Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, JCOM has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while JCOM trades at $142.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas JCOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to JCOM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to JCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check JCOM's competition here
PATH vs SQSP Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, SQSP has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while SQSP trades at $46.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas SQSP's P/E ratio is -1164.25. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SQSP's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to SQSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check SQSP's competition here
PATH vs CCCS Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, CCCS has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while CCCS trades at $9.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas CCCS's P/E ratio is 973.00. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CCCS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is less volatile compared to CCCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check CCCS's competition here
PATH vs NEWR Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, NEWR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while NEWR trades at $86.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas NEWR's P/E ratio is -41.62. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NEWR's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to NEWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check NEWR's competition here
PATH vs VRNS Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, VRNS has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while VRNS trades at $54.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas VRNS's P/E ratio is -59.49. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to VRNS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to VRNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check VRNS's competition here
PATH vs CFLT Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, CFLT has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while CFLT trades at $17.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas CFLT's P/E ratio is -18.49. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CFLT's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is less volatile compared to CFLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check CFLT's competition here
PATH vs S Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, S has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while S trades at $17.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas S's P/E ratio is -13.59. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to S's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to S. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check S's competition here
PATH vs WEX Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, WEX has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while WEX trades at $166.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas WEX's P/E ratio is 21.04. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to WEX's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to WEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check WEX's competition here
PATH vs NVEI Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, NVEI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while NVEI trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas NVEI's P/E ratio is 212.44. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NVEI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to NVEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check NVEI's competition here
PATH vs QLYS Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, QLYS has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while QLYS trades at $130.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas QLYS's P/E ratio is 26.69. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to QLYS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to QLYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check QLYS's competition here
PATH vs BOX Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while BOX trades at $31.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 24.30. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BOX's ROE of +1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to BOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check BOX's competition here
PATH vs ACIW Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ACIW has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while ACIW trades at $40.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas ACIW's P/E ratio is 16.10. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ACIW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to ACIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check ACIW's competition here
PATH vs EEFT Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, EEFT has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while EEFT trades at $93.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas EEFT's P/E ratio is 13.91. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EEFT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to EEFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check EEFT's competition here
PATH vs ODD Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ODD has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while ODD trades at $71.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas ODD's P/E ratio is 41.21. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ODD's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is less volatile compared to ODD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check ODD's competition here
PATH vs SPSC Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, SPSC has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while SPSC trades at $103.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas SPSC's P/E ratio is 47.65. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SPSC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to SPSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check SPSC's competition here
PATH vs ESMT Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ESMT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while ESMT trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas ESMT's P/E ratio is 153.67. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ESMT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to ESMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check ESMT's competition here
PATH vs CORZ Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, CORZ has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while CORZ trades at $12.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas CORZ's P/E ratio is -3.23. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CORZ's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to CORZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check CORZ's competition here
PATH vs AVPT Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, AVPT has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while AVPT trades at $17.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas AVPT's P/E ratio is -138.08. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AVPT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to AVPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check AVPT's competition here
PATH vs TENB Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, TENB has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while TENB trades at $30.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas TENB's P/E ratio is -82.62. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TENB's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to TENB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check TENB's competition here
PATH vs CORZZ Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, CORZZ has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while CORZZ trades at $12.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas CORZZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CORZZ's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to CORZZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check CORZZ's competition here
PATH vs STNE Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, STNE has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while STNE trades at $12.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas STNE's P/E ratio is -15.91. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to STNE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to STNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check STNE's competition here
PATH vs CLBT Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, CLBT has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while CLBT trades at $13.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas CLBT's P/E ratio is -14.89. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CLBT's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to CLBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check CLBT's competition here
PATH vs RELY Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, RELY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while RELY trades at $15.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas RELY's P/E ratio is -526.33. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to RELY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to RELY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check RELY's competition here
PATH vs SWI Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, SWI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while SWI trades at $18.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas SWI's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SWI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to SWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check SWI's competition here
PATH vs EVOP Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, EVOP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while EVOP trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas EVOP's P/E ratio is -309.00. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EVOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to EVOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check EVOP's competition here
PATH vs DLO Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, DLO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while DLO trades at $10.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas DLO's P/E ratio is 20.85. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DLO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to DLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check DLO's competition here
PATH vs MQ Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, MQ has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while MQ trades at $5.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas MQ's P/E ratio is 55.30. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MQ's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to MQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check MQ's competition here
PATH vs PAGS Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, PAGS has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while PAGS trades at $7.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas PAGS's P/E ratio is 6.30. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PAGS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to PAGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check PAGS's competition here
PATH vs WRD Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, WRD has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while WRD trades at $8.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas WRD's P/E ratio is -7.27. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to WRD's ROE of -1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is less volatile compared to WRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check WRD's competition here
PATH vs DOCN Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, DOCN has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while DOCN trades at $25.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas DOCN's P/E ratio is 22.78. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DOCN's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is less volatile compared to DOCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check DOCN's competition here
PATH vs PAYO Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, PAYO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while PAYO trades at $6.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas PAYO's P/E ratio is 22.43. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PAYO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to PAYO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check PAYO's competition here
PATH vs EVTC Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, EVTC has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while EVTC trades at $34.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas EVTC's P/E ratio is 16.32. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EVTC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to EVTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check EVTC's competition here
PATH vs PGYWW Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, PGYWW has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while PGYWW trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas PGYWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PGYWW's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is less volatile compared to PGYWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check PGYWW's competition here
PATH vs PGY Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, PGY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while PGY trades at $29.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas PGY's P/E ratio is -5.57. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PGY's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is less volatile compared to PGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check PGY's competition here
PATH vs BB Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, BB has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while BB trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas BB's P/E ratio is 179.75. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BB's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to BB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check BB's competition here
PATH vs RAMP Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, RAMP has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while RAMP trades at $32.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas RAMP's P/E ratio is -800.00. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to RAMP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to RAMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check RAMP's competition here
PATH vs GETVV Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, GETVV has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while GETVV trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas GETVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GETVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is less volatile compared to GETVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check GETVV's competition here
PATH vs APPN Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, APPN has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while APPN trades at $27.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas APPN's P/E ratio is -33.16. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to APPN's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to APPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check APPN's competition here
PATH vs AVDX Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, AVDX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while AVDX trades at $9.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas AVDX's P/E ratio is 246.50. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AVDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to AVDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check AVDX's competition here
PATH vs FORG Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, FORG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while FORG trades at $23.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas FORG's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FORG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is less volatile compared to FORG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check FORG's competition here
PATH vs TDC Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, TDC has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while TDC trades at $20.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas TDC's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TDC's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to TDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check TDC's competition here
PATH vs CORZW Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, CORZW has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while CORZW trades at $6.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas CORZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CORZW's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is less volatile compared to CORZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check CORZW's competition here
PATH vs GSKY Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, GSKY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while GSKY trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas GSKY's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GSKY's ROE of +5.47%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to GSKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check GSKY's competition here
PATH vs FIVN Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, FIVN has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while FIVN trades at $24.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas FIVN's P/E ratio is -404.67. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FIVN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is less volatile compared to FIVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check FIVN's competition here
PATH vs EVCM Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, EVCM has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while EVCM trades at $9.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas EVCM's P/E ratio is -83.17. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EVCM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is less volatile compared to EVCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check EVCM's competition here
PATH vs CSGS Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, CSGS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while CSGS trades at $60.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas CSGS's P/E ratio is 20.81. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CSGS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to CSGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check CSGS's competition here
PATH vs GET Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, GET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while GET trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas GET's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to GET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check GET's competition here
PATH vs STER Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, STER has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while STER trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas STER's P/E ratio is -98.47. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to STER's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to STER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check STER's competition here
PATH vs ZUO Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ZUO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while ZUO trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas ZUO's P/E ratio is -19.65. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ZUO's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to ZUO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check ZUO's competition here
PATH vs NTCT Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, NTCT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while NTCT trades at $20.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas NTCT's P/E ratio is -4.06. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NTCT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to NTCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check NTCT's competition here
PATH vs SUMO Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, SUMO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while SUMO trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas SUMO's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SUMO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to SUMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check SUMO's competition here
PATH vs GB Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, GB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while GB trades at $7.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas GB's P/E ratio is 18.05. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GB's ROE of +0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to GB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check GB's competition here
PATH vs BASE Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, BASE has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while BASE trades at $24.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas BASE's P/E ratio is -17.82. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BASE's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to BASE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check BASE's competition here
PATH vs RPD Comparison August 2025
PATH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PATH stands at 5.9B. In comparison, RPD has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PATH is priced at $11.11, while RPD trades at $20.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PATH currently has a P/E ratio of -92.67, whereas RPD's P/E ratio is 49.66. In terms of profitability, PATH's ROE is -0.04%, compared to RPD's ROE of +9.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PATH is more volatile compared to RPD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PATH.Check RPD's competition here