Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
Palo Alto Networks, Inc. PANW Peers
See (PANW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PANW | $197.18 | +1.60% | 131.5B | 112.67 | $1.75 | N/A |
| MSFT | $467.68 | +0.82% | 3.5T | 36.20 | $12.92 | +0.69% |
| ORCL | $171.19 | +1.84% | 480.1B | 40.19 | $4.26 | +1.00% |
| PLTR | $119.91 | -7.77% | 271.3B | 521.35 | $0.23 | N/A |
| ADBE | $415.20 | +0.31% | 177B | 27.42 | $15.14 | N/A |
| CRWD | $462.94 | +0.52% | 115.3B | -670.93 | -$0.69 | N/A |
| FTNT | $103.50 | +1.85% | 79.2B | 42.59 | $2.43 | N/A |
| SNPS | $482.39 | +1.94% | 74.8B | 55.70 | $8.66 | N/A |
| CRWV | $135.05 | -17.20% | 64.8B | -53.17 | -$2.54 | N/A |
| HOOD | $72.52 | +0.35% | 64B | 41.44 | $1.75 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
PANW vs MSFT Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, MSFT has a market cap of 3.5T. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while MSFT trades at $467.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas MSFT's P/E ratio is 36.20. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MSFT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to MSFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs ORCL Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, ORCL has a market cap of 480.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while ORCL trades at $171.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas ORCL's P/E ratio is 40.19. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ORCL's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to ORCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs PLTR Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, PLTR has a market cap of 271.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while PLTR trades at $119.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas PLTR's P/E ratio is 521.35. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PLTR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to PLTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs ADBE Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 177B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while ADBE trades at $415.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 27.42. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs CRWD Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, CRWD has a market cap of 115.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while CRWD trades at $462.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas CRWD's P/E ratio is -670.93. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CRWD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to CRWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs FTNT Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, FTNT has a market cap of 79.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while FTNT trades at $103.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas FTNT's P/E ratio is 42.59. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to FTNT's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to FTNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs SNPS Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, SNPS has a market cap of 74.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while SNPS trades at $482.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas SNPS's P/E ratio is 55.70. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SNPS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to SNPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs CRWV Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, CRWV has a market cap of 64.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while CRWV trades at $135.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas CRWV's P/E ratio is -53.17. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CRWV's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to CRWV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs HOOD Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, HOOD has a market cap of 64B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while HOOD trades at $72.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas HOOD's P/E ratio is 41.44. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HOOD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to HOOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs VMW Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, VMW has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while VMW trades at $142.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas VMW's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to VMW's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to VMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs NET Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, NET has a market cap of 61.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while NET trades at $176.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas NET's P/E ratio is -734.96. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NET's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to NET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs SQ Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, SQ has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while SQ trades at $83.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas SQ's P/E ratio is 49.98. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SQ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to SQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs ZS Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, ZS has a market cap of 46.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while ZS trades at $300.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas ZS's P/E ratio is -1157.46. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ZS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to ZS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs XYZ Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, XYZ has a market cap of 39.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while XYZ trades at $63.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas XYZ's P/E ratio is 15.44. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to XYZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW and XYZ have similar daily volatility (2.73).
PANW vs NETE Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, NETE has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while NETE trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas NETE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NETE's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to NETE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs IOT Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, IOT has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while IOT trades at $47.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas IOT's P/E ratio is -168.89. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to IOT's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to IOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs SPLK Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, SPLK has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while SPLK trades at $156.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas SPLK's P/E ratio is 103.22. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SPLK's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to SPLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs VRSN Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, VRSN has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while VRSN trades at $277.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas VRSN's P/E ratio is 34.10. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to VRSN's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to VRSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs GDDY Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, GDDY has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while GDDY trades at $180.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas GDDY's P/E ratio is 34.70. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GDDY's ROE of +2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to GDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs CHKP Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, CHKP has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while CHKP trades at $231.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas CHKP's P/E ratio is 30.57. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CHKP's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to CHKP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs TOST Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, TOST has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while TOST trades at $42.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas TOST's P/E ratio is 158.56. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TOST's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to TOST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs CPAY Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, CPAY has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while CPAY trades at $331.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas CPAY's P/E ratio is 23.23. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CPAY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to CPAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs FLT Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, FLT has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while FLT trades at $303.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas FLT's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to FLT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to FLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs NTNX Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, NTNX has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while NTNX trades at $78.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas NTNX's P/E ratio is -301.27. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NTNX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to NTNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs CYBR Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, CYBR has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while CYBR trades at $392.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas CYBR's P/E ratio is -191.31. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CYBR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to CYBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs RBRK Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, RBRK has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while RBRK trades at $98.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas RBRK's P/E ratio is -13.15. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to RBRK's ROE of +2.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to RBRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs MDB Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, MDB has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while MDB trades at $225.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas MDB's P/E ratio is -129.53. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MDB's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to MDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs GEN Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, GEN has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while GEN trades at $29.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas GEN's P/E ratio is 28.29. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GEN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to GEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs AFRM Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, AFRM has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while AFRM trades at $55.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas AFRM's P/E ratio is -293.21. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AFRM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to AFRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs OKTA Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, OKTA has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while OKTA trades at $104.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas OKTA's P/E ratio is 160.31. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to OKTA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to OKTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs FFIV Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, FFIV has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while FFIV trades at $293.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas FFIV's P/E ratio is 27.92. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to FFIV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to FFIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs KSPI Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, KSPI has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while KSPI trades at $84.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas KSPI's P/E ratio is 7.76. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to KSPI's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to KSPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs NLOK Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, NLOK has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while NLOK trades at $21.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas NLOK's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NLOK's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to NLOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs AKAM Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, AKAM has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while AKAM trades at $76.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas AKAM's P/E ratio is 25.56. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AKAM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to AKAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs DOX Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, DOX has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while DOX trades at $90.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas DOX's P/E ratio is 19.11. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DOX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to DOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs SAIL Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, SAIL has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while SAIL trades at $18.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas SAIL's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SAIL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to SAIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs ALTR Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, ALTR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while ALTR trades at $111.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas ALTR's P/E ratio is 699.06. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ALTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to ALTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs PLAN Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, PLAN has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while PLAN trades at $63.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas PLAN's P/E ratio is -44.82. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PLAN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to PLAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs KVYO Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, KVYO has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while KVYO trades at $33.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas KVYO's P/E ratio is -199.71. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to KVYO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to KVYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs WIX Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, WIX has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while WIX trades at $153.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas WIX's P/E ratio is 60.81. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WIX's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to WIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs INFA Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, INFA has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while INFA trades at $24.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas INFA's P/E ratio is 805.50. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to INFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to INFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs DBX Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, DBX has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while DBX trades at $29.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas DBX's P/E ratio is 19.41. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DBX's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to DBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs CFLT Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, CFLT has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while CFLT trades at $24.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas CFLT's P/E ratio is -24.93. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CFLT's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to CFLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs HCP Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, HCP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while HCP trades at $34.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas HCP's P/E ratio is -57.97. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HCP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to HCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs PATH Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, PATH has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while PATH trades at $13.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas PATH's P/E ratio is -110.67. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PATH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to PATH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs JCOM Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, JCOM has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while JCOM trades at $142.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas JCOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to JCOM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to JCOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs SQSP Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, SQSP has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while SQSP trades at $46.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas SQSP's P/E ratio is -1164.25. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SQSP's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to SQSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs FOUR Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, FOUR has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while FOUR trades at $94.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas FOUR's P/E ratio is 32.26. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to FOUR's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to FOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs NEWR Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, NEWR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while NEWR trades at $86.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas NEWR's P/E ratio is -41.62. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NEWR's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to NEWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs CCCS Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, CCCS has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while CCCS trades at $8.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas CCCS's P/E ratio is 893.00. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CCCS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to CCCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs S Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, S has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while S trades at $18.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas S's P/E ratio is -13.72. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to S's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to S. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs VRNS Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, VRNS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while VRNS trades at $50.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas VRNS's P/E ratio is -61.90. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to VRNS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to VRNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs BOX Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while BOX trades at $37.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 29.19. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BOX's ROE of +2.72%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to BOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs SPSC Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, SPSC has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while SPSC trades at $142.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas SPSC's P/E ratio is 64.96. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SPSC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to SPSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs QLYS Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, QLYS has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while QLYS trades at $139.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas QLYS's P/E ratio is 28.57. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to QLYS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to QLYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs ACIW Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, ACIW has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while ACIW trades at $46.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas ACIW's P/E ratio is 18.57. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ACIW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to ACIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs NVEI Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, NVEI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while NVEI trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas NVEI's P/E ratio is 212.44. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NVEI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to NVEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs EEFT Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, EEFT has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while EEFT trades at $109.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas EEFT's P/E ratio is 16.25. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to EEFT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to EEFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs WEX Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, WEX has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while WEX trades at $136.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas WEX's P/E ratio is 17.56. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WEX's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to WEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs ODD Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, ODD has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while ODD trades at $77.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas ODD's P/E ratio is 44.30. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ODD's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to ODD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs RELY Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, RELY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while RELY trades at $20.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas RELY's P/E ratio is -695.67. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to RELY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to RELY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs CLBT Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, CLBT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while CLBT trades at $16.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas CLBT's P/E ratio is -18.32. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CLBT's ROE of -1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to CLBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs TENB Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, TENB has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while TENB trades at $32.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas TENB's P/E ratio is -85.68. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TENB's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to TENB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs ESMT Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, ESMT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while ESMT trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas ESMT's P/E ratio is 153.67. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ESMT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to ESMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs AVPT Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, AVPT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while AVPT trades at $18.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas AVPT's P/E ratio is -145.77. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AVPT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to AVPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs STNE Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, STNE has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while STNE trades at $13.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas STNE's P/E ratio is -17.96. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to STNE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to STNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs CORZ Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, CORZ has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while CORZ trades at $11.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas CORZ's P/E ratio is -3.04. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CORZ's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to CORZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs CORZZ Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, CORZZ has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while CORZZ trades at $11.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas CORZZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CORZZ's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to CORZZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs SWI Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, SWI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while SWI trades at $18.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas SWI's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SWI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to SWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs EVOP Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, EVOP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while EVOP trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas EVOP's P/E ratio is -309.00. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to EVOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to EVOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs DLO Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, DLO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while DLO trades at $10.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas DLO's P/E ratio is 21.31. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DLO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to DLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs PAGS Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, PAGS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while PAGS trades at $8.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas PAGS's P/E ratio is 7.32. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PAGS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to PAGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs MQ Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, MQ has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while MQ trades at $5.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas MQ's P/E ratio is 55.10. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MQ's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to MQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs DOCN Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, DOCN has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while DOCN trades at $27.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas DOCN's P/E ratio is 24.57. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DOCN's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to DOCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs PAYO Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, PAYO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while PAYO trades at $6.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas PAYO's P/E ratio is 24.57. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PAYO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to PAYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs BB Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, BB has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while BB trades at $4.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas BB's P/E ratio is -407.50. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BB's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to BB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs APPN Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, APPN has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while APPN trades at $31.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas APPN's P/E ratio is -38.30. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to APPN's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to APPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs EVTC Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, EVTC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while EVTC trades at $36.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas EVTC's P/E ratio is 18.24. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to EVTC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to EVTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs FIVN Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, FIVN has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while FIVN trades at $28.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas FIVN's P/E ratio is -476.00. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to FIVN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to FIVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs RAMP Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, RAMP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while RAMP trades at $33.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas RAMP's P/E ratio is -828.12. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to RAMP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to RAMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs TDC Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, TDC has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while TDC trades at $22.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas TDC's P/E ratio is 15.73. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TDC's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to TDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs GETVV Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, GETVV has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while GETVV trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas GETVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GETVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to GETVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs AVDX Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, AVDX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while AVDX trades at $9.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas AVDX's P/E ratio is 244.25. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AVDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to AVDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs FORG Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, FORG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while FORG trades at $23.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas FORG's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to FORG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to FORG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs GSKY Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, GSKY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while GSKY trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas GSKY's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GSKY's ROE of +5.47%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to GSKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs EVCM Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, EVCM has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while EVCM trades at $10.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas EVCM's P/E ratio is -85.33. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to EVCM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to EVCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs CSGS Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, CSGS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while CSGS trades at $63.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas CSGS's P/E ratio is 21.61. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CSGS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to CSGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs CORZW Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, CORZW has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while CORZW trades at $6.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas CORZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CORZW's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to CORZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs GET Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, GET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while GET trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas GET's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to GET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs NTCT Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, NTCT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while NTCT trades at $23.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas NTCT's P/E ratio is -4.54. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NTCT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to NTCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs STER Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, STER has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while STER trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas STER's P/E ratio is -98.47. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to STER's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to STER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs AVPTW Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, AVPTW has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while AVPTW trades at $7.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas AVPTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AVPTW's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to AVPTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs ZUO Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, ZUO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while ZUO trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas ZUO's P/E ratio is -19.65. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ZUO's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to ZUO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs TUYA Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, TUYA has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while TUYA trades at $2.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas TUYA's P/E ratio is 66.50. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TUYA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to TUYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs SUMO Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, SUMO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while SUMO trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas SUMO's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SUMO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to SUMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs RPD Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, RPD has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while RPD trades at $23.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas RPD's P/E ratio is 56.51. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to RPD's ROE of +9.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to RPD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs GB Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, GB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while GB trades at $7.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas GB's P/E ratio is 18.55. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GB's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to GB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs PGYWW Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, PGYWW has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while PGYWW trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas PGYWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PGYWW's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to PGYWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs PAYA Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 131.5B. In comparison, PAYA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $197.18, while PAYA trades at $9.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 112.67, whereas PAYA's P/E ratio is 139.14. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PAYA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to PAYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.