Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
Palo Alto Networks, Inc. PANW Peers
See (PANW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PANW | $199.88 | +2.09% | 133.3B | 114.87 | $1.74 | N/A |
| MSFT | $510.06 | +0.00% | 3.8T | 39.36 | $12.96 | +0.78% |
| ORCL | $243.54 | -0.78% | 684.3B | 56.14 | $4.34 | +0.90% |
| PLTR | $151.79 | -1.13% | 343.5B | 632.46 | $0.24 | N/A |
| ADBE | $367.68 | +0.52% | 156B | 23.52 | $15.63 | N/A |
| CRWD | $481.58 | +1.18% | 120B | -697.94 | -$0.69 | N/A |
| HOOD | $104.34 | -4.92% | 92.1B | 59.62 | $1.75 | N/A |
| SNPS | $591.46 | +1.15% | 91.7B | 68.35 | $8.65 | N/A |
| FTNT | $106.94 | +1.44% | 81.9B | 44.01 | $2.43 | N/A |
| NET | $197.76 | +0.21% | 68.5B | -859.52 | -$0.23 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
PANW vs MSFT Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, MSFT has a market cap of 3.8T. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while MSFT trades at $510.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas MSFT's P/E ratio is 39.36. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MSFT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to MSFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs ORCL Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, ORCL has a market cap of 684.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while ORCL trades at $243.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas ORCL's P/E ratio is 56.14. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ORCL's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to ORCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs PLTR Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, PLTR has a market cap of 343.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while PLTR trades at $151.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas PLTR's P/E ratio is 632.46. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PLTR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to PLTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs ADBE Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 156B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while ADBE trades at $367.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 23.52. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs CRWD Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, CRWD has a market cap of 120B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while CRWD trades at $481.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas CRWD's P/E ratio is -697.94. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CRWD's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to CRWD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs HOOD Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, HOOD has a market cap of 92.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while HOOD trades at $104.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas HOOD's P/E ratio is 59.62. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HOOD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to HOOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs SNPS Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, SNPS has a market cap of 91.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while SNPS trades at $591.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas SNPS's P/E ratio is 68.35. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SNPS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to SNPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs FTNT Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, FTNT has a market cap of 81.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while FTNT trades at $106.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas FTNT's P/E ratio is 44.01. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FTNT's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to FTNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs NET Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, NET has a market cap of 68.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while NET trades at $197.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas NET's P/E ratio is -859.52. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NET's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to NET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs VMW Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, VMW has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while VMW trades at $142.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas VMW's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VMW's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to VMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs CRWV Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, CRWV has a market cap of 60B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while CRWV trades at $124.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas CRWV's P/E ratio is -49.37. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CRWV's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to CRWV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs SQ Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, SQ has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while SQ trades at $83.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas SQ's P/E ratio is 49.98. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SQ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to SQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs XYZ Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, XYZ has a market cap of 48B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while XYZ trades at $78.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas XYZ's P/E ratio is 18.96. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to XYZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to XYZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs ZS Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, ZS has a market cap of 44.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while ZS trades at $288.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas ZS's P/E ratio is -1153.72. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ZS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to ZS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs NETE Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, NETE has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while NETE trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas NETE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NETE's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to NETE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs TOST Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, TOST has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while TOST trades at $47.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas TOST's P/E ratio is 175.35. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TOST's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to TOST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs VRSN Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, VRSN has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while VRSN trades at $284.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas VRSN's P/E ratio is 34.74. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VRSN's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to VRSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs SPLK Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, SPLK has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while SPLK trades at $156.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas SPLK's P/E ratio is 103.22. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SPLK's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to SPLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs CHKP Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, CHKP has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while CHKP trades at $222.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas CHKP's P/E ratio is 29.45. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CHKP's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to CHKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs GDDY Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, GDDY has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while GDDY trades at $168.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas GDDY's P/E ratio is 32.41. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GDDY's ROE of +2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to GDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs CPAY Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, CPAY has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while CPAY trades at $330.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas CPAY's P/E ratio is 23.23. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CPAY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to CPAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs FLT Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, FLT has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while FLT trades at $303.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas FLT's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FLT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to FLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs IOT Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, IOT has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while IOT trades at $38.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas IOT's P/E ratio is -173.48. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IOT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to IOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs AFRM Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, AFRM has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while AFRM trades at $66.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas AFRM's P/E ratio is -351.32. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AFRM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to AFRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs NTNX Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, NTNX has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while NTNX trades at $75.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas NTNX's P/E ratio is -289.04. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NTNX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to NTNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs CYBR Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, CYBR has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while CYBR trades at $386.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas CYBR's P/E ratio is -190.17. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CYBR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to CYBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs GEN Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, GEN has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while GEN trades at $30.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas GEN's P/E ratio is 29.41. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GEN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to GEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs MDB Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, MDB has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while MDB trades at $222.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas MDB's P/E ratio is -204.04. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MDB's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to MDB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs FFIV Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, FFIV has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while FFIV trades at $300.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas FFIV's P/E ratio is 28.53. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FFIV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to FFIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs RBRK Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, RBRK has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while RBRK trades at $86.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas RBRK's P/E ratio is 24.93. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RBRK's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to RBRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs KSPI Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, KSPI has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while KSPI trades at $87.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas KSPI's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KSPI's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to KSPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs OKTA Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, OKTA has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while OKTA trades at $95.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas OKTA's P/E ratio is 147.37. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OKTA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to OKTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs NLOK Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, NLOK has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while NLOK trades at $21.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas NLOK's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NLOK's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to NLOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs AKAM Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, AKAM has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while AKAM trades at $78.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas AKAM's P/E ratio is 26.41. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AKAM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to AKAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs SAIL Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, SAIL has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while SAIL trades at $20.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas SAIL's P/E ratio is -12.67. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SAIL's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to SAIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs DOX Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, DOX has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while DOX trades at $88.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas DOX's P/E ratio is 18.34. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DOX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to DOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs ALTR Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, ALTR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while ALTR trades at $111.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas ALTR's P/E ratio is 699.06. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ALTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to ALTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs PLAN Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, PLAN has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while PLAN trades at $63.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas PLAN's P/E ratio is -44.82. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PLAN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to PLAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs FOUR Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, FOUR has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while FOUR trades at $105.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas FOUR's P/E ratio is 36.25. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FOUR's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to FOUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs KVYO Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, KVYO has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while KVYO trades at $32.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas KVYO's P/E ratio is -191.29. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KVYO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to KVYO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs CFLT Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, CFLT has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while CFLT trades at $25.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas CFLT's P/E ratio is -26.27. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CFLT's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to CFLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs WIX Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, WIX has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while WIX trades at $153.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas WIX's P/E ratio is 61.34. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WIX's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to WIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs INFA Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, INFA has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while INFA trades at $24.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas INFA's P/E ratio is 817.33. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to INFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to INFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs DBX Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, DBX has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while DBX trades at $27.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas DBX's P/E ratio is 17.91. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DBX's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to DBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs HCP Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, HCP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while HCP trades at $34.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas HCP's P/E ratio is -57.97. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HCP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to HCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs JCOM Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, JCOM has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while JCOM trades at $142.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas JCOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to JCOM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to JCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs PATH Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, PATH has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while PATH trades at $12.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas PATH's P/E ratio is -103.83. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PATH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to PATH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs SQSP Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, SQSP has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while SQSP trades at $46.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas SQSP's P/E ratio is -1164.25. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SQSP's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to SQSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs CCCS Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, CCCS has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while CCCS trades at $9.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas CCCS's P/E ratio is 969.00. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CCCS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to CCCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs S Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, S has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while S trades at $19.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas S's P/E ratio is -14.99. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to S's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to S. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs NEWR Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, NEWR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while NEWR trades at $86.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas NEWR's P/E ratio is -41.62. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NEWR's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to NEWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs VRNS Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, VRNS has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while VRNS trades at $52.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas VRNS's P/E ratio is -64.36. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VRNS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to VRNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs WEX Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, WEX has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while WEX trades at $154.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas WEX's P/E ratio is 19.87. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WEX's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to WEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs SPSC Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, SPSC has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while SPSC trades at $137.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas SPSC's P/E ratio is 64.57. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SPSC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to SPSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs QLYS Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, QLYS has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while QLYS trades at $139.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas QLYS's P/E ratio is 28.53. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to QLYS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to QLYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs NVEI Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, NVEI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while NVEI trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas NVEI's P/E ratio is 212.44. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NVEI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to NVEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs BOX Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while BOX trades at $32.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 25.28. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BOX's ROE of +1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to BOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs ACIW Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, ACIW has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while ACIW trades at $45.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas ACIW's P/E ratio is 17.79. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ACIW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to ACIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs EEFT Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, EEFT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while EEFT trades at $101.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas EEFT's P/E ratio is 14.97. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EEFT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to EEFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs PGYWW Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, PGYWW has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while PGYWW trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas PGYWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PGYWW's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to PGYWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs TENB Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, TENB has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while TENB trades at $33.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas TENB's P/E ratio is -87.61. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TENB's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to TENB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs CORZZ Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, CORZZ has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while CORZZ trades at $13.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas CORZZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CORZZ's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW and CORZZ have similar daily volatility (4.32).
PANW vs CORZ Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, CORZ has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while CORZ trades at $13.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas CORZ's P/E ratio is -3.39. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CORZ's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to CORZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs ODD Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, ODD has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while ODD trades at $70.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas ODD's P/E ratio is 40.36. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ODD's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to ODD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs AVPT Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, AVPT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while AVPT trades at $19.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas AVPT's P/E ratio is -148.23. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AVPT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to AVPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs ESMT Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, ESMT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while ESMT trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas ESMT's P/E ratio is 153.67. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ESMT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to ESMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs RELY Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, RELY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while RELY trades at $17.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas RELY's P/E ratio is -575.67. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RELY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to RELY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs STNE Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, STNE has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while STNE trades at $13.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas STNE's P/E ratio is -16.23. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to STNE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to STNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs CLBT Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, CLBT has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while CLBT trades at $14.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas CLBT's P/E ratio is -15.43. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CLBT's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to CLBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs SWI Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, SWI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while SWI trades at $18.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas SWI's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SWI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to SWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs DLO Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, DLO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while DLO trades at $10.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas DLO's P/E ratio is 22.71. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DLO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to DLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs EVOP Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, EVOP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while EVOP trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas EVOP's P/E ratio is -309.00. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EVOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to EVOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs MQ Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, MQ has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while MQ trades at $5.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas MQ's P/E ratio is 58.50. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MQ's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to MQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs DOCN Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, DOCN has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while DOCN trades at $29.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas DOCN's P/E ratio is 25.32. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DOCN's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to DOCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs PAGS Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, PAGS has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while PAGS trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas PAGS's P/E ratio is 6.51. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PAGS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to PAGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs WRD Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, WRD has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while WRD trades at $9.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas WRD's P/E ratio is -7.76. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WRD's ROE of -1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to WRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs PAYO Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, PAYO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while PAYO trades at $6.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas PAYO's P/E ratio is 24.39. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PAYO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to PAYO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs PGY Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, PGY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while PGY trades at $31.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas PGY's P/E ratio is -5.99. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PGY's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to PGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs BB Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, BB has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while BB trades at $3.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas BB's P/E ratio is 194.25. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BB's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to BB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs RAMP Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, RAMP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while RAMP trades at $33.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas RAMP's P/E ratio is -832.00. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RAMP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to RAMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs APPN Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, APPN has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while APPN trades at $28.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas APPN's P/E ratio is -34.88. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to APPN's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to APPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs EVTC Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, EVTC has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while EVTC trades at $33.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas EVTC's P/E ratio is 16.80. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EVTC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to EVTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs FIVN Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, FIVN has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while FIVN trades at $27.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas FIVN's P/E ratio is -454.83. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FIVN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to FIVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs GETVV Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, GETVV has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while GETVV trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas GETVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GETVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to GETVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs TDC Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, TDC has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while TDC trades at $21.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas TDC's P/E ratio is 15.27. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TDC's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to TDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs CORZW Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, CORZW has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while CORZW trades at $7.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas CORZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CORZW's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to CORZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs EVCM Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, EVCM has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while EVCM trades at $11.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas EVCM's P/E ratio is -93.58. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EVCM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to EVCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs AVDX Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, AVDX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while AVDX trades at $9.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas AVDX's P/E ratio is 246.50. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AVDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to AVDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs FORG Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, FORG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while FORG trades at $23.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas FORG's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FORG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to FORG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs GSKY Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, GSKY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while GSKY trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas GSKY's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GSKY's ROE of +5.47%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to GSKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs CSGS Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, CSGS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while CSGS trades at $62.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas CSGS's P/E ratio is 21.27. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CSGS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to CSGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs GET Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, GET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while GET trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas GET's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to GET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs STER Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, STER has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while STER trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas STER's P/E ratio is -98.47. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to STER's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to STER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs NTCT Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, NTCT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while NTCT trades at $22.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas NTCT's P/E ratio is -4.49. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NTCT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to NTCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs TUYA Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, TUYA has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while TUYA trades at $2.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas TUYA's P/E ratio is 62.88. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TUYA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is less volatile compared to TUYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs ZUO Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, ZUO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while ZUO trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas ZUO's P/E ratio is -19.65. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ZUO's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to ZUO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs SUMO Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, SUMO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while SUMO trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas SUMO's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SUMO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to SUMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs GB Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, GB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while GB trades at $7.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas GB's P/E ratio is 17.99. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GB's ROE of +0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to GB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.
PANW vs RPD Comparison
PANW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PANW stands at 133.3B. In comparison, RPD has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PANW is priced at $199.88, while RPD trades at $22.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PANW currently has a P/E ratio of 114.87, whereas RPD's P/E ratio is 55.29. In terms of profitability, PANW's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RPD's ROE of +9.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PANW is more volatile compared to RPD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PANW.