Cloudflare, Inc.
Cloudflare, Inc. NET Peers
See (NET) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NET | $190.89 | +0.18% | 65.5B | -788.12 | -$0.24 | N/A |
| MSFT | $507.66 | +0.47% | 3.8T | 39.03 | $12.96 | +0.64% |
| ORCL | $242.47 | +1.83% | 679.7B | 55.75 | $4.34 | +0.74% |
| PLTR | $152.99 | +2.63% | 349.9B | 672.30 | $0.23 | N/A |
| ADBE | $372.20 | -0.18% | 158B | 23.83 | $15.63 | N/A |
| PANW | $199.55 | +1.43% | 132.8B | 115.16 | $1.73 | N/A |
| CRWD | $465.20 | -1.28% | 115B | -650.03 | -$0.71 | N/A |
| SNPS | $612.91 | -0.36% | 113.7B | 70.87 | $8.67 | N/A |
| HOOD | $101.81 | -0.04% | 90B | 58.33 | $1.75 | N/A |
| FTNT | $105.08 | +0.26% | 80.4B | 43.06 | $2.44 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
NET vs MSFT Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, MSFT has a market cap of 3.8T. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while MSFT trades at $507.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas MSFT's P/E ratio is 39.03. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MSFT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is more volatile compared to MSFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs ORCL Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, ORCL has a market cap of 679.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while ORCL trades at $242.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas ORCL's P/E ratio is 55.75. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ORCL's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is more volatile compared to ORCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs PLTR Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, PLTR has a market cap of 349.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while PLTR trades at $152.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas PLTR's P/E ratio is 672.30. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PLTR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is more volatile compared to PLTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs ADBE Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 158B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while ADBE trades at $372.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 23.83. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is more volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs PANW Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, PANW has a market cap of 132.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while PANW trades at $199.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas PANW's P/E ratio is 115.16. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PANW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is more volatile compared to PANW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs CRWD Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, CRWD has a market cap of 115B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while CRWD trades at $465.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas CRWD's P/E ratio is -650.03. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CRWD's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is more volatile compared to CRWD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs SNPS Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, SNPS has a market cap of 113.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while SNPS trades at $612.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas SNPS's P/E ratio is 70.87. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SNPS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is more volatile compared to SNPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs HOOD Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, HOOD has a market cap of 90B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while HOOD trades at $101.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas HOOD's P/E ratio is 58.33. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to HOOD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is more volatile compared to HOOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs FTNT Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, FTNT has a market cap of 80.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while FTNT trades at $105.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas FTNT's P/E ratio is 43.06. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to FTNT's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is more volatile compared to FTNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs VMW Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, VMW has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while VMW trades at $142.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas VMW's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to VMW's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is more volatile compared to VMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs CRWV Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, CRWV has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while CRWV trades at $124.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas CRWV's P/E ratio is -49.82. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CRWV's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is less volatile compared to CRWV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs SQ Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, SQ has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while SQ trades at $83.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas SQ's P/E ratio is 49.98. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SQ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is less volatile compared to SQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs XYZ Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, XYZ has a market cap of 49B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while XYZ trades at $79.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas XYZ's P/E ratio is 19.34. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to XYZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is less volatile compared to XYZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs ZS Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, ZS has a market cap of 44.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while ZS trades at $284.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas ZS's P/E ratio is -1089.88. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ZS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is more volatile compared to ZS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs NETE Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, NETE has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while NETE trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas NETE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NETE's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is less volatile compared to NETE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs TOST Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, TOST has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while TOST trades at $48.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas TOST's P/E ratio is 175.70. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to TOST's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is less volatile compared to TOST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs VRSN Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, VRSN has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while VRSN trades at $288.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas VRSN's P/E ratio is 35.37. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to VRSN's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is more volatile compared to VRSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs SPLK Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, SPLK has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while SPLK trades at $156.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas SPLK's P/E ratio is 103.22. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SPLK's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is more volatile compared to SPLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs CPAY Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, CPAY has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while CPAY trades at $343.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas CPAY's P/E ratio is 24.14. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CPAY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is more volatile compared to CPAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs CHKP Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, CHKP has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while CHKP trades at $223.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas CHKP's P/E ratio is 29.46. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CHKP's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is more volatile compared to CHKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs GDDY Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, GDDY has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while GDDY trades at $168.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas GDDY's P/E ratio is 32.09. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GDDY's ROE of +2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is less volatile compared to GDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs IOT Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, IOT has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while IOT trades at $38.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas IOT's P/E ratio is -175.50. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to IOT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is less volatile compared to IOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs FLT Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, FLT has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while FLT trades at $303.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas FLT's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to FLT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is more volatile compared to FLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs AFRM Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, AFRM has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while AFRM trades at $66.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas AFRM's P/E ratio is -345.47. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AFRM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is less volatile compared to AFRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs NTNX Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, NTNX has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while NTNX trades at $74.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas NTNX's P/E ratio is -286.08. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NTNX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is more volatile compared to NTNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs GEN Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, GEN has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while GEN trades at $30.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas GEN's P/E ratio is 29.79. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GEN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is more volatile compared to GEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs CYBR Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, CYBR has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while CYBR trades at $377.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas CYBR's P/E ratio is -186.21. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CYBR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is less volatile compared to CYBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs MDB Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, MDB has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while MDB trades at $236.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas MDB's P/E ratio is -209.40. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MDB's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is less volatile compared to MDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs FFIV Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, FFIV has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while FFIV trades at $299.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas FFIV's P/E ratio is 28.52. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to FFIV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is more volatile compared to FFIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs KSPI Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, KSPI has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while KSPI trades at $87.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas KSPI's P/E ratio is 8.44. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to KSPI's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is less volatile compared to KSPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs RBRK Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, RBRK has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while RBRK trades at $85.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas RBRK's P/E ratio is 24.46. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to RBRK's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is more volatile compared to RBRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs OKTA Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, OKTA has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while OKTA trades at $95.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas OKTA's P/E ratio is 147.12. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to OKTA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is more volatile compared to OKTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs NLOK Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, NLOK has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while NLOK trades at $21.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas NLOK's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NLOK's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is less volatile compared to NLOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs AKAM Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, AKAM has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while AKAM trades at $80.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas AKAM's P/E ratio is 27.07. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AKAM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is more volatile compared to AKAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs SAIL Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, SAIL has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while SAIL trades at $20.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas SAIL's P/E ratio is -12.75. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SAIL's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is more volatile compared to SAIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs DOX Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, DOX has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while DOX trades at $89.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas DOX's P/E ratio is 18.85. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to DOX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is more volatile compared to DOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs ALTR Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, ALTR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while ALTR trades at $111.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas ALTR's P/E ratio is 699.06. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ALTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is more volatile compared to ALTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs FOUR Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, FOUR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while FOUR trades at $107.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas FOUR's P/E ratio is 36.54. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to FOUR's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is more volatile compared to FOUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs PLAN Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, PLAN has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while PLAN trades at $63.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas PLAN's P/E ratio is -44.82. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PLAN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is more volatile compared to PLAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs KVYO Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, KVYO has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while KVYO trades at $33.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas KVYO's P/E ratio is -194.00. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to KVYO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is more volatile compared to KVYO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs CFLT Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, CFLT has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while CFLT trades at $26.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas CFLT's P/E ratio is -27.16. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CFLT's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is less volatile compared to CFLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs WIX Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, WIX has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while WIX trades at $155.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas WIX's P/E ratio is 61.34. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to WIX's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is more volatile compared to WIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs INFA Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, INFA has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while INFA trades at $24.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas INFA's P/E ratio is 818.17. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to INFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is more volatile compared to INFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs DBX Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, DBX has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while DBX trades at $27.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas DBX's P/E ratio is 18.52. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to DBX's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is more volatile compared to DBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs HCP Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, HCP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while HCP trades at $34.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas HCP's P/E ratio is -57.97. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to HCP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is more volatile compared to HCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs PATH Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, PATH has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while PATH trades at $12.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas PATH's P/E ratio is -105.21. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PATH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is more volatile compared to PATH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs JCOM Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, JCOM has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while JCOM trades at $142.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas JCOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to JCOM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is less volatile compared to JCOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs CCCS Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, CCCS has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while CCCS trades at $9.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas CCCS's P/E ratio is 999.00. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CCCS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is more volatile compared to CCCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs SQSP Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, SQSP has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while SQSP trades at $46.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas SQSP's P/E ratio is -1164.25. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SQSP's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is more volatile compared to SQSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs S Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, S has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while S trades at $19.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas S's P/E ratio is -14.77. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to S's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is more volatile compared to S. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs NEWR Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, NEWR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while NEWR trades at $86.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas NEWR's P/E ratio is -41.62. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NEWR's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is more volatile compared to NEWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs VRNS Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, VRNS has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while VRNS trades at $52.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas VRNS's P/E ratio is -63.96. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to VRNS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is less volatile compared to VRNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs WEX Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, WEX has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while WEX trades at $170.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas WEX's P/E ratio is 21.16. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to WEX's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is less volatile compared to WEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs SPSC Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, SPSC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while SPSC trades at $139.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas SPSC's P/E ratio is 65.85. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SPSC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is less volatile compared to SPSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs QLYS Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, QLYS has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while QLYS trades at $139.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas QLYS's P/E ratio is 28.64. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to QLYS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is more volatile compared to QLYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs NVEI Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, NVEI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while NVEI trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas NVEI's P/E ratio is 212.44. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NVEI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is more volatile compared to NVEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs ACIW Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, ACIW has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while ACIW trades at $46.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas ACIW's P/E ratio is 18.17. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ACIW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is more volatile compared to ACIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs BOX Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while BOX trades at $33.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 25.42. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BOX's ROE of +1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is more volatile compared to BOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs EEFT Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, EEFT has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while EEFT trades at $105.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas EEFT's P/E ratio is 15.74. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to EEFT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is less volatile compared to EEFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs CORZZ Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, CORZZ has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while CORZZ trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas CORZZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CORZZ's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is less volatile compared to CORZZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs CORZ Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, CORZ has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while CORZ trades at $13.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas CORZ's P/E ratio is -3.44. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CORZ's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is more volatile compared to CORZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs TENB Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, TENB has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while TENB trades at $33.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas TENB's P/E ratio is -88.00. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to TENB's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is more volatile compared to TENB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs AVPT Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, AVPT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while AVPT trades at $18.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas AVPT's P/E ratio is -145.46. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AVPT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is more volatile compared to AVPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs ODD Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, ODD has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while ODD trades at $68.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas ODD's P/E ratio is 40.18. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ODD's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is less volatile compared to ODD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs ESMT Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, ESMT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while ESMT trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas ESMT's P/E ratio is 153.67. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ESMT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is more volatile compared to ESMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs STNE Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, STNE has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while STNE trades at $13.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas STNE's P/E ratio is -17.81. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to STNE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is more volatile compared to STNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs RELY Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, RELY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while RELY trades at $17.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas RELY's P/E ratio is -580.33. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to RELY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is more volatile compared to RELY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs CLBT Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, CLBT has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while CLBT trades at $14.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas CLBT's P/E ratio is -15.99. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CLBT's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is more volatile compared to CLBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs SWI Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, SWI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while SWI trades at $18.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas SWI's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SWI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is more volatile compared to SWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs DLO Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, DLO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while DLO trades at $11.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas DLO's P/E ratio is 23.29. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to DLO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is more volatile compared to DLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs EVOP Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, EVOP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while EVOP trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas EVOP's P/E ratio is -309.00. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to EVOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is more volatile compared to EVOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs WRD Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, WRD has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while WRD trades at $10.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas WRD's P/E ratio is -8.39. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to WRD's ROE of -1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is less volatile compared to WRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs PGYWW Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, PGYWW has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while PGYWW trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas PGYWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PGYWW's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is less volatile compared to PGYWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs MQ Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, MQ has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while MQ trades at $5.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas MQ's P/E ratio is 58.90. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MQ's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is more volatile compared to MQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs PAGS Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, PAGS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while PAGS trades at $8.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas PAGS's P/E ratio is 6.65. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PAGS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is more volatile compared to PAGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs DOCN Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, DOCN has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while DOCN trades at $28.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas DOCN's P/E ratio is 25.50. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to DOCN's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is less volatile compared to DOCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs PGY Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, PGY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while PGY trades at $33.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas PGY's P/E ratio is -6.43. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PGY's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is less volatile compared to PGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs PAYO Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, PAYO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while PAYO trades at $6.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas PAYO's P/E ratio is 24.32. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PAYO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is more volatile compared to PAYO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs BB Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, BB has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while BB trades at $4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas BB's P/E ratio is 205.50. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BB's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is less volatile compared to BB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs APPN Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, APPN has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while APPN trades at $30.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas APPN's P/E ratio is -36.51. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to APPN's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, NET and APPN have similar daily volatility (1.34).
NET vs FIVN Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, FIVN has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while FIVN trades at $28.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas FIVN's P/E ratio is -486.00. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to FIVN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is more volatile compared to FIVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs RAMP Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, RAMP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while RAMP trades at $32.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas RAMP's P/E ratio is -823.00. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to RAMP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is less volatile compared to RAMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs EVTC Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, EVTC has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while EVTC trades at $33.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas EVTC's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to EVTC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is more volatile compared to EVTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs TDC Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, TDC has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while TDC trades at $22.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas TDC's P/E ratio is 15.74. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to TDC's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is more volatile compared to TDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs EVCM Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, EVCM has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while EVCM trades at $11.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas EVCM's P/E ratio is -96.58. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to EVCM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is more volatile compared to EVCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs CORZW Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, CORZW has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while CORZW trades at $7.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas CORZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CORZW's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is less volatile compared to CORZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs GETVV Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, GETVV has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while GETVV trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas GETVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GETVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NET is less volatile compared to GETVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs AVDX Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, AVDX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while AVDX trades at $9.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas AVDX's P/E ratio is 246.25. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AVDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is more volatile compared to AVDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs FORG Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, FORG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while FORG trades at $23.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas FORG's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to FORG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is less volatile compared to FORG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs GSKY Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, GSKY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while GSKY trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas GSKY's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GSKY's ROE of +5.47%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is less volatile compared to GSKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs CSGS Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, CSGS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while CSGS trades at $63.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas CSGS's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CSGS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is more volatile compared to CSGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs GET Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, GET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while GET trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas GET's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NET is less volatile compared to GET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs STER Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, STER has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while STER trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas STER's P/E ratio is -98.47. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to STER's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is more volatile compared to STER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs NTCT Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, NTCT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while NTCT trades at $22.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas NTCT's P/E ratio is -4.44. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NTCT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is more volatile compared to NTCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs TUYA Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, TUYA has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while TUYA trades at $2.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas TUYA's P/E ratio is 64.25. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to TUYA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is less volatile compared to TUYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs ZUO Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, ZUO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while ZUO trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas ZUO's P/E ratio is -19.65. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ZUO's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is more volatile compared to ZUO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs SUMO Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, SUMO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while SUMO trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas SUMO's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SUMO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is more volatile compared to SUMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs GB Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, GB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while GB trades at $7.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas GB's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GB's ROE of +0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is more volatile compared to GB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.
NET vs RPD Comparison
NET plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NET stands at 65.5B. In comparison, RPD has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NET is priced at $190.89, while RPD trades at $22.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NET currently has a P/E ratio of -788.12, whereas RPD's P/E ratio is 55.76. In terms of profitability, NET's ROE is -0.08%, compared to RPD's ROE of +9.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NET is less volatile compared to RPD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NET.