Microsoft Corporation

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, ORCL has a market cap of 702.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while ORCL trades at $256.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas ORCL's P/E ratio is 59.40. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ORCL's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to ORCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check ORCL's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, PLTR has a market cap of 423.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while PLTR trades at $179.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas PLTR's P/E ratio is 603.10. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PLTR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to PLTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check PLTR's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 144.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while ADBE trades at $345.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 22.31. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check ADBE's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, SNPS has a market cap of 114.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while SNPS trades at $625.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas SNPS's P/E ratio is 71.69. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SNPS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to SNPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check SNPS's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, PANW has a market cap of 111.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while PANW trades at $172.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas PANW's P/E ratio is 95.46. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PANW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to PANW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check PANW's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, CRWD has a market cap of 105.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while CRWD trades at $451.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas CRWD's P/E ratio is -624.25. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CRWD's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to CRWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check CRWD's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, HOOD has a market cap of 101.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while HOOD trades at $105.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas HOOD's P/E ratio is 58.18. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to HOOD's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to HOOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check HOOD's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, NET has a market cap of 71.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while NET trades at $215.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas NET's P/E ratio is -601.60. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NET's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to NET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check NET's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, CRWV has a market cap of 63.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while CRWV trades at $110.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas CRWV's P/E ratio is -51.00. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CRWV's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to CRWV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check CRWV's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, VMW has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while VMW trades at $142.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas VMW's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to VMW's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is more volatile compared to VMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check VMW's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, FTNT has a market cap of 56.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while FTNT trades at $96.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas FTNT's P/E ratio is 29.64. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to FTNT's ROE of +1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is more volatile compared to FTNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check FTNT's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, SQ has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while SQ trades at $83.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas SQ's P/E ratio is 49.98. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SQ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to SQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check SQ's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, XYZ has a market cap of 45.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while XYZ trades at $76.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas XYZ's P/E ratio is 17.81. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to XYZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to XYZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check XYZ's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, ZS has a market cap of 42B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while ZS trades at $289.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas ZS's P/E ratio is -1078.78. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ZS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to ZS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check ZS's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, NETE has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while NETE trades at $13.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas NETE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NETE's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to NETE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check NETE's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, SPLK has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while SPLK trades at $156.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas SPLK's P/E ratio is 103.22. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SPLK's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is more volatile compared to SPLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check SPLK's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, VRSN has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while VRSN trades at $273.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas VRSN's P/E ratio is 32.45. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to VRSN's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to VRSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check VRSN's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, TOST has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while TOST trades at $45.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas TOST's P/E ratio is 110.38. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to TOST's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to TOST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check TOST's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, AFRM has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while AFRM trades at $77.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas AFRM's P/E ratio is -380.68. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to AFRM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to AFRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check AFRM's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, FLT has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while FLT trades at $303.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas FLT's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to FLT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is more volatile compared to FLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check FLT's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, CPAY has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while CPAY trades at $315.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas CPAY's P/E ratio is 20.46. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CPAY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to CPAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check CPAY's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, CYBR has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while CYBR trades at $413.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas CYBR's P/E ratio is -112.29. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CYBR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to CYBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check CYBR's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, CHKP has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while CHKP trades at $188.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas CHKP's P/E ratio is 24.28. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CHKP's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to CHKP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check CHKP's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, NTNX has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while NTNX trades at $75.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas NTNX's P/E ratio is -275.31. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NTNX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to NTNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check NTNX's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, IOT has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while IOT trades at $36.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas IOT's P/E ratio is -153.36. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to IOT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to IOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check IOT's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, GDDY has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while GDDY trades at $154.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas GDDY's P/E ratio is 25.64. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to GDDY's ROE of +2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to GDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check GDDY's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, GEN has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while GEN trades at $28.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas GEN's P/E ratio is 29.56. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to GEN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to GEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check GEN's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, FFIV has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while FFIV trades at $321.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas FFIV's P/E ratio is 28.73. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to FFIV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to FFIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check FFIV's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, KSPI has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while KSPI trades at $88.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas KSPI's P/E ratio is 9.01. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to KSPI's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to KSPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check KSPI's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, MDB has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while MDB trades at $235.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas MDB's P/E ratio is -199.22. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to MDB's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to MDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check MDB's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, RBRK has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while RBRK trades at $91.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas RBRK's P/E ratio is 25.20. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to RBRK's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to RBRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check RBRK's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, OKTA has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while OKTA trades at $97.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas OKTA's P/E ratio is 147.66. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to OKTA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to OKTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check OKTA's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, NLOK has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while NLOK trades at $21.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas NLOK's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NLOK's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to NLOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check NLOK's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, SAIL has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while SAIL trades at $20.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas SAIL's P/E ratio is -11.92. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SAIL's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to SAIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check SAIL's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, AKAM has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while AKAM trades at $74.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas AKAM's P/E ratio is 23.67. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to AKAM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to AKAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check AKAM's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, DOX has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while DOX trades at $84.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas DOX's P/E ratio is 18.78. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to DOX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is more volatile compared to DOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check DOX's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, ALTR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while ALTR trades at $111.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas ALTR's P/E ratio is 699.06. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ALTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is more volatile compared to ALTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check ALTR's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, PLAN has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while PLAN trades at $63.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas PLAN's P/E ratio is -44.82. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PLAN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is more volatile compared to PLAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check PLAN's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, KVYO has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while KVYO trades at $35.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas KVYO's P/E ratio is -134.71. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to KVYO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to KVYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check KVYO's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, INFA has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while INFA trades at $24.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas INFA's P/E ratio is -822.83. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to INFA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is more volatile compared to INFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check INFA's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, DBX has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while DBX trades at $26.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas DBX's P/E ratio is 17.70. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to DBX's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to DBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check DBX's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, FOUR has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while FOUR trades at $82.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas FOUR's P/E ratio is 30.69. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to FOUR's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to FOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check FOUR's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, HCP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while HCP trades at $34.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas HCP's P/E ratio is -57.97. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to HCP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is more volatile compared to HCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check HCP's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, WIX has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while WIX trades at $128.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas WIX's P/E ratio is 43.56. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to WIX's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to WIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check WIX's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, JCOM has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while JCOM trades at $142.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas JCOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to JCOM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to JCOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check JCOM's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, SQSP has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while SQSP trades at $46.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas SQSP's P/E ratio is -1164.25. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SQSP's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is more volatile compared to SQSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check SQSP's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, CCCS has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while CCCS trades at $9.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas CCCS's P/E ratio is 952.00. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CCCS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to CCCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check CCCS's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, NEWR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while NEWR trades at $86.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas NEWR's P/E ratio is -41.62. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NEWR's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is more volatile compared to NEWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check NEWR's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, VRNS has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while VRNS trades at $55.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas VRNS's P/E ratio is -57.38. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to VRNS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to VRNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check VRNS's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, WEX has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while WEX trades at $171.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas WEX's P/E ratio is 21.31. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to WEX's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to WEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check WEX's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, PATH has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while PATH trades at $11.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas PATH's P/E ratio is -88.83. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PATH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to PATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check PATH's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, CFLT has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while CFLT trades at $17.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas CFLT's P/E ratio is -17.95. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CFLT's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to CFLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check CFLT's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, S has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while S trades at $17.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas S's P/E ratio is -12.14. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to S's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to S. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check S's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, NVEI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while NVEI trades at $33.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas NVEI's P/E ratio is 212.44. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NVEI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is more volatile compared to NVEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check NVEI's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, ACIW has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while ACIW trades at $42.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas ACIW's P/E ratio is 17.61. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ACIW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to ACIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check ACIW's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, QLYS has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while QLYS trades at $130.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas QLYS's P/E ratio is 25.59. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to QLYS's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to QLYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check QLYS's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while BOX trades at $31.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 24.47. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BOX's ROE of +1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is more volatile compared to BOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check BOX's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, CORZ has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while CORZ trades at $14.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas CORZ's P/E ratio is -3.68. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CORZ's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to CORZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check CORZ's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, CORZZ has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while CORZZ trades at $14.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas CORZZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CORZZ's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to CORZZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check CORZZ's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, SPSC has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while SPSC trades at $110.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas SPSC's P/E ratio is 48.74. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SPSC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to SPSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check SPSC's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, STNE has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while STNE trades at $13.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas STNE's P/E ratio is -18.05. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to STNE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to STNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check STNE's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, RELY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while RELY trades at $16.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas RELY's P/E ratio is 316.67. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to RELY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to RELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check RELY's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, ESMT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while ESMT trades at $23.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas ESMT's P/E ratio is 153.67. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ESMT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is more volatile compared to ESMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check ESMT's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, EEFT has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while EEFT trades at $92.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas EEFT's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to EEFT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to EEFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check EEFT's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, TENB has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while TENB trades at $30.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas TENB's P/E ratio is -80.53. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to TENB's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to TENB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check TENB's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, ODD has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while ODD trades at $57.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas ODD's P/E ratio is 32.34. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ODD's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to ODD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check ODD's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, CLBT has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while CLBT trades at $13.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas CLBT's P/E ratio is -14.75. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CLBT's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to CLBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check CLBT's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, SWI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while SWI trades at $18.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas SWI's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SWI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is more volatile compared to SWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check SWI's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, DLO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while DLO trades at $10.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas DLO's P/E ratio is 22.85. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to DLO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to DLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check DLO's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, AVPT has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while AVPT trades at $17.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas AVPT's P/E ratio is -110.23. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to AVPT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to AVPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check AVPT's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, DOCN has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while DOCN trades at $36.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas DOCN's P/E ratio is 25.21. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to DOCN's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to DOCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check DOCN's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, EVOP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while EVOP trades at $33.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas EVOP's P/E ratio is -309.00. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to EVOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is more volatile compared to EVOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check EVOP's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, MQ has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while MQ trades at $5.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas MQ's P/E ratio is -50.15. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to MQ's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to MQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check MQ's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, PAGS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while PAGS trades at $8.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas PAGS's P/E ratio is 6.88. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PAGS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to PAGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check PAGS's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, WRD has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while WRD trades at $8.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas WRD's P/E ratio is -7.72. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to WRD's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to WRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check WRD's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, PAYO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while PAYO trades at $7.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas PAYO's P/E ratio is 26.56. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PAYO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to PAYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check PAYO's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, PGYWW has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while PGYWW trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas PGYWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PGYWW's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to PGYWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check PGYWW's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, CORZW has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while CORZW trades at $8.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas CORZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CORZW's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to CORZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check CORZW's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, EVTC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while EVTC trades at $35.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas EVTC's P/E ratio is 16.76. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to EVTC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to EVTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check EVTC's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, PGY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while PGY trades at $31.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas PGY's P/E ratio is -5.48. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PGY's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to PGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check PGY's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, APPN has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while APPN trades at $26.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas APPN's P/E ratio is -35.05. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to APPN's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to APPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check APPN's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, BB has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while BB trades at $3.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas BB's P/E ratio is 180.75. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BB's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to BB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check BB's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, GETVV has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while GETVV trades at $2.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas GETVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to GETVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to GETVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check GETVV's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, AVDX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while AVDX trades at $9.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas AVDX's P/E ratio is 246.50. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to AVDX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is more volatile compared to AVDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check AVDX's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, EVCM has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while EVCM trades at $10.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas EVCM's P/E ratio is -135.75. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to EVCM's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to EVCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check EVCM's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, TDC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while TDC trades at $21.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas TDC's P/E ratio is 18.16. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to TDC's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to TDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check TDC's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, FORG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while FORG trades at $23.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas FORG's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to FORG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to FORG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check FORG's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, FIVN has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while FIVN trades at $25.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas FIVN's P/E ratio is 203.25. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to FIVN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to FIVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check FIVN's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, GSKY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while GSKY trades at $10.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas GSKY's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to GSKY's ROE of +5.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to GSKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check GSKY's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, CSGS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while CSGS trades at $62.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas CSGS's P/E ratio is 22.41. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CSGS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to CSGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check CSGS's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, GET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while GET trades at $1.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas GET's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to GET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to GET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check GET's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, RAMP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while RAMP trades at $32.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas RAMP's P/E ratio is 139.26. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to RAMP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to RAMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check RAMP's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, STER has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while STER trades at $16.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas STER's P/E ratio is -98.47. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to STER's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is more volatile compared to STER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check STER's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, TUYA has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while TUYA trades at $2.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas TUYA's P/E ratio is 63.00. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to TUYA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to TUYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check TUYA's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, NTCT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while NTCT trades at $21.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas NTCT's P/E ratio is 20.96. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NTCT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to NTCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check NTCT's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, ZUO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while ZUO trades at $10.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas ZUO's P/E ratio is -19.65. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ZUO's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is more volatile compared to ZUO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check ZUO's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, SUMO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while SUMO trades at $12.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas SUMO's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SUMO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is more volatile compared to SUMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check SUMO's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, GB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while GB trades at $7.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas GB's P/E ratio is 18.23. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to GB's ROE of +0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is more volatile compared to GB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check GB's competition here

MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.9T. In comparison, BASE has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $524.94, while BASE trades at $24.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 38.56, whereas BASE's P/E ratio is -17.87. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BASE's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is more volatile compared to BASE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.Check BASE's competition here