Microsoft Corporation
Microsoft Corporation MSFT Peers
See (MSFT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSFT | $462.97 | +0.22% | 3.4T | 35.78 | $12.94 | +0.70% |
| ORCL | $169.15 | +1.55% | 474.3B | 39.80 | $4.25 | +1.01% |
| PLTR | $133.17 | +0.86% | 314.3B | 605.32 | $0.22 | N/A |
| ADBE | $412.49 | +2.25% | 175.8B | 27.23 | $15.15 | N/A |
| PANW | $197.18 | +1.19% | 131.5B | 113.98 | $1.73 | N/A |
| CRWD | $488.87 | +2.02% | 121.8B | -4888.70 | -$0.10 | N/A |
| FTNT | $102.88 | +0.40% | 78.7B | 42.34 | $2.43 | N/A |
| SNPS | $466.26 | +0.02% | 72.3B | 54.03 | $8.63 | N/A |
| CRWV | $150.48 | +25.19% | 72.2B | -59.24 | -$2.54 | N/A |
| HOOD | $71.72 | +5.50% | 63.3B | 40.98 | $1.75 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MSFT vs ORCL Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, ORCL has a market cap of 474.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while ORCL trades at $169.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas ORCL's P/E ratio is 39.80. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ORCL's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to ORCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs PLTR Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, PLTR has a market cap of 314.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while PLTR trades at $133.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas PLTR's P/E ratio is 605.32. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to PLTR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to PLTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs ADBE Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 175.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while ADBE trades at $412.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 27.23. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs PANW Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, PANW has a market cap of 131.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while PANW trades at $197.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas PANW's P/E ratio is 113.98. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to PANW's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to PANW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs CRWD Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, CRWD has a market cap of 121.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while CRWD trades at $488.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas CRWD's P/E ratio is -4888.70. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CRWD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to CRWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs FTNT Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, FTNT has a market cap of 78.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while FTNT trades at $102.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas FTNT's P/E ratio is 42.34. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to FTNT's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to FTNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs SNPS Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, SNPS has a market cap of 72.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while SNPS trades at $466.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas SNPS's P/E ratio is 54.03. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SNPS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to SNPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs CRWV Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, CRWV has a market cap of 72.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while CRWV trades at $150.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas CRWV's P/E ratio is -59.24. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CRWV's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to CRWV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs HOOD Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, HOOD has a market cap of 63.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while HOOD trades at $71.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas HOOD's P/E ratio is 40.98. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to HOOD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to HOOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs VMW Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, VMW has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while VMW trades at $142.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas VMW's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to VMW's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to VMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs NET Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, NET has a market cap of 59.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while NET trades at $172.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas NET's P/E ratio is -750.17. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to NET's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to NET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs SQ Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, SQ has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while SQ trades at $83.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas SQ's P/E ratio is 49.98. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SQ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to SQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs ZS Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, ZS has a market cap of 45.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while ZS trades at $295.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas ZS's P/E ratio is -1134.73. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ZS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to ZS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs XYZ Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, XYZ has a market cap of 39B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while XYZ trades at $63.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas XYZ's P/E ratio is 15.41. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to XYZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to XYZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs NETE Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, NETE has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while NETE trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas NETE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to NETE's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to NETE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs SPLK Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, SPLK has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while SPLK trades at $156.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas SPLK's P/E ratio is 103.22. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SPLK's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is more volatile compared to SPLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs IOT Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, IOT has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while IOT trades at $45.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas IOT's P/E ratio is -163.77. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to IOT's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to IOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs VRSN Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, VRSN has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while VRSN trades at $275.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas VRSN's P/E ratio is 33.75. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to VRSN's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to VRSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs GDDY Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, GDDY has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while GDDY trades at $181.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas GDDY's P/E ratio is 35.01. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to GDDY's ROE of +2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to GDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs CHKP Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, CHKP has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while CHKP trades at $229.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas CHKP's P/E ratio is 30.33. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CHKP's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to CHKP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs TOST Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, TOST has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while TOST trades at $41.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas TOST's P/E ratio is 154.19. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to TOST's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to TOST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs CPAY Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, CPAY has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while CPAY trades at $326.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas CPAY's P/E ratio is 22.91. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CPAY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to CPAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs FLT Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, FLT has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while FLT trades at $303.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas FLT's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to FLT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to FLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs NTNX Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, NTNX has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while NTNX trades at $77.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas NTNX's P/E ratio is -298.92. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to NTNX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to NTNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs CYBR Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, CYBR has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while CYBR trades at $394.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas CYBR's P/E ratio is -192.23. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CYBR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to CYBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs RBRK Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, RBRK has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while RBRK trades at $98.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas RBRK's P/E ratio is -13.10. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to RBRK's ROE of +2.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to RBRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs GEN Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, GEN has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while GEN trades at $28.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas GEN's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to GEN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to GEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs AFRM Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, AFRM has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while AFRM trades at $54.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas AFRM's P/E ratio is -289.26. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to AFRM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to AFRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs OKTA Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, OKTA has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while OKTA trades at $103.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas OKTA's P/E ratio is 159.35. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to OKTA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to OKTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs FFIV Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, FFIV has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while FFIV trades at $290.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas FFIV's P/E ratio is 27.60. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to FFIV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to FFIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs MDB Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, MDB has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while MDB trades at $193.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas MDB's P/E ratio is -111.35. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to MDB's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to MDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs KSPI Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, KSPI has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while KSPI trades at $82.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas KSPI's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to KSPI's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to KSPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs NLOK Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, NLOK has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while NLOK trades at $21.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas NLOK's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to NLOK's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to NLOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs AKAM Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, AKAM has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while AKAM trades at $77.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas AKAM's P/E ratio is 25.86. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to AKAM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to AKAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs DOX Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, DOX has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while DOX trades at $92.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas DOX's P/E ratio is 19.34. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to DOX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to DOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs SAIL Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, SAIL has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while SAIL trades at $17.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas SAIL's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SAIL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to SAIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs ALTR Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, ALTR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while ALTR trades at $111.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas ALTR's P/E ratio is 699.06. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ALTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is more volatile compared to ALTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs PLAN Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, PLAN has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while PLAN trades at $63.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas PLAN's P/E ratio is -44.82. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to PLAN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is more volatile compared to PLAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs KVYO Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, KVYO has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while KVYO trades at $33.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas KVYO's P/E ratio is -199.71. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to KVYO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to KVYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs WIX Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, WIX has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while WIX trades at $151.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas WIX's P/E ratio is 60.18. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to WIX's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to WIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs INFA Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, INFA has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while INFA trades at $24.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas INFA's P/E ratio is 803.67. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to INFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is more volatile compared to INFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs DBX Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, DBX has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while DBX trades at $29.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas DBX's P/E ratio is 19.43. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to DBX's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to DBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs CFLT Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, CFLT has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while CFLT trades at $23.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas CFLT's P/E ratio is -24.11. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CFLT's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to CFLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs HCP Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, HCP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while HCP trades at $34.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas HCP's P/E ratio is -57.97. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to HCP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is more volatile compared to HCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs PATH Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, PATH has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while PATH trades at $13.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas PATH's P/E ratio is -108.71. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to PATH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to PATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs JCOM Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, JCOM has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while JCOM trades at $142.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas JCOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to JCOM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to JCOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs SQSP Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, SQSP has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while SQSP trades at $46.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas SQSP's P/E ratio is -1164.25. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SQSP's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is more volatile compared to SQSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs FOUR Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, FOUR has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while FOUR trades at $95.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas FOUR's P/E ratio is 32.60. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to FOUR's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to FOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs NEWR Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, NEWR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while NEWR trades at $86.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas NEWR's P/E ratio is -41.62. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to NEWR's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is more volatile compared to NEWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs CCCS Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, CCCS has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while CCCS trades at $8.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas CCCS's P/E ratio is 880.00. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CCCS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to CCCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs S Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, S has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while S trades at $18.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas S's P/E ratio is -13.74. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to S's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to S. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs VRNS Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, VRNS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while VRNS trades at $49.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas VRNS's P/E ratio is -61.46. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to VRNS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to VRNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs BOX Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while BOX trades at $38.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 29.52. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to BOX's ROE of +2.72%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to BOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs SPSC Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, SPSC has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while SPSC trades at $142.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas SPSC's P/E ratio is 66.42. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SPSC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to SPSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs QLYS Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, QLYS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while QLYS trades at $142.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas QLYS's P/E ratio is 29.16. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to QLYS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to QLYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs ACIW Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, ACIW has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while ACIW trades at $46.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas ACIW's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ACIW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to ACIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs NVEI Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, NVEI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while NVEI trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas NVEI's P/E ratio is 212.44. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to NVEI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is more volatile compared to NVEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs WEX Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, WEX has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while WEX trades at $136.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas WEX's P/E ratio is 17.61. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to WEX's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to WEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs EEFT Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, EEFT has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while EEFT trades at $107.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas EEFT's P/E ratio is 15.99. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to EEFT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to EEFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs ODD Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, ODD has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while ODD trades at $77.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas ODD's P/E ratio is 44.42. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ODD's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to ODD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs RELY Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, RELY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while RELY trades at $20.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas RELY's P/E ratio is -698.63. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to RELY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to RELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs TENB Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, TENB has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while TENB trades at $32.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas TENB's P/E ratio is -86.16. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to TENB's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to TENB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs CLBT Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, CLBT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while CLBT trades at $16.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas CLBT's P/E ratio is -18.10. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CLBT's ROE of -1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to CLBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs ESMT Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, ESMT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while ESMT trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas ESMT's P/E ratio is 153.67. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ESMT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is more volatile compared to ESMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs AVPT Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, AVPT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while AVPT trades at $18.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas AVPT's P/E ratio is -145.81. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to AVPT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to AVPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs STNE Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, STNE has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while STNE trades at $14.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas STNE's P/E ratio is -18.39. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to STNE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to STNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs CORZZ Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, CORZZ has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while CORZZ trades at $11.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas CORZZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CORZZ's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to CORZZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs CORZ Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, CORZ has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while CORZ trades at $11.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas CORZ's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CORZ's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to CORZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs SWI Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, SWI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while SWI trades at $18.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas SWI's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SWI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is more volatile compared to SWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs DLO Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, DLO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while DLO trades at $10.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas DLO's P/E ratio is 22.08. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to DLO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to DLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs PAGS Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, PAGS has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while PAGS trades at $9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas PAGS's P/E ratio is 7.63. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to PAGS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to PAGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs EVOP Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, EVOP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while EVOP trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas EVOP's P/E ratio is -309.00. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to EVOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is more volatile compared to EVOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs DOCN Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, DOCN has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while DOCN trades at $30.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas DOCN's P/E ratio is 26.59. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to DOCN's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to DOCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs MQ Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, MQ has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while MQ trades at $5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas MQ's P/E ratio is 53.50. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to MQ's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to MQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs PAYO Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, PAYO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while PAYO trades at $6.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas PAYO's P/E ratio is 23.96. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to PAYO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to PAYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs BB Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, BB has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while BB trades at $3.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas BB's P/E ratio is -396.50. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to BB's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to BB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs APPN Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, APPN has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while APPN trades at $31.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas APPN's P/E ratio is -38.39. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to APPN's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to APPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs EVTC Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, EVTC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while EVTC trades at $36.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas EVTC's P/E ratio is 18.30. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to EVTC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to EVTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs TDC Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, TDC has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while TDC trades at $22.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas TDC's P/E ratio is 15.79. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to TDC's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to TDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs RAMP Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, RAMP has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while RAMP trades at $32.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas RAMP's P/E ratio is -817.25. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to RAMP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to RAMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs FIVN Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, FIVN has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while FIVN trades at $27.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas FIVN's P/E ratio is -462.17. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to FIVN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to FIVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs GETVV Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, GETVV has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while GETVV trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas GETVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to GETVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to GETVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs AVDX Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, AVDX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while AVDX trades at $9.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas AVDX's P/E ratio is 244.25. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to AVDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is more volatile compared to AVDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs FORG Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, FORG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while FORG trades at $23.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas FORG's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to FORG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to FORG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs GSKY Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, GSKY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while GSKY trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas GSKY's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to GSKY's ROE of +5.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to GSKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs EVCM Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, EVCM has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while EVCM trades at $10.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas EVCM's P/E ratio is -84.71. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to EVCM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to EVCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs CSGS Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, CSGS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while CSGS trades at $63.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas CSGS's P/E ratio is 21.72. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CSGS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to CSGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs CORZW Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, CORZW has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while CORZW trades at $6.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas CORZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CORZW's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to CORZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs GET Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, GET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while GET trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas GET's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to GET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to GET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs NTCT Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, NTCT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while NTCT trades at $23.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas NTCT's P/E ratio is -4.57. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to NTCT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to NTCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs STER Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, STER has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while STER trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas STER's P/E ratio is -98.47. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to STER's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is more volatile compared to STER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs RPD Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, RPD has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while RPD trades at $23.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas RPD's P/E ratio is 58.51. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to RPD's ROE of +9.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to RPD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs ZUO Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, ZUO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while ZUO trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas ZUO's P/E ratio is -19.65. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ZUO's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to ZUO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs AVPTW Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, AVPTW has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while AVPTW trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas AVPTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to AVPTW's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to AVPTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs SUMO Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, SUMO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while SUMO trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas SUMO's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SUMO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is more volatile compared to SUMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs GB Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, GB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while GB trades at $7.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas GB's P/E ratio is 25.69. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to GB's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is more volatile compared to GB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs PGYWW Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, PGYWW has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while PGYWW trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas PGYWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to PGYWW's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to PGYWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs TUYA Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, TUYA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while TUYA trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas TUYA's P/E ratio is 62.50. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to TUYA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to TUYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.
MSFT vs PGY Comparison
MSFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSFT stands at 3.4T. In comparison, PGY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MSFT is priced at $462.97, while PGY trades at $17.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSFT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.78, whereas PGY's P/E ratio is -3.28. In terms of profitability, MSFT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to PGY's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, MSFT is less volatile compared to PGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSFT.