Lyft, Inc.

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 323.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while SAP trades at $278.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 42.73. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check SAP's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 231.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while CRM trades at $233.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 37.89. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check CRM's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 199.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while INTU trades at $710.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 58.65. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check INTU's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 193.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while UBER trades at $91.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 15.78. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check UBER's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 183.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while SHOP trades at $144.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 78.59. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check SHOP's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 180.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while NOW trades at $850.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 109.25. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check NOW's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 148.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while APP trades at $433.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 60.26. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check APP's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 103.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while MSTR trades at $372.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is 25.71. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MSTR's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check MSTR's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 95.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while CDNS trades at $348.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 94.56. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check CDNS's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 66.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while SNOW trades at $194.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is -47.52. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check SNOW's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 61.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while ADSK trades at $283.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 61.66. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check ADSK's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 60.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while WDAY trades at $221.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 125.61. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check WDAY's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 44.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while DDOG trades at $124.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 353.47. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check DDOG's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 43.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while TEAM trades at $164.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is -170.42. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check TEAM's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while ANSS trades at $374.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 55.53. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check ANSS's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 32.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while STRF trades at $116.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to STRF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check STRF's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 32.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while FICO trades at $1,318.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 52.53. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check FICO's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while STRK trades at $104.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to STRK's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check STRK's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, TTD has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while TTD trades at $50.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas TTD's P/E ratio is 62.80. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TTD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to TTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check TTD's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while TYL trades at $573.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 81.84. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check TYL's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while PTC trades at $208.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 48.55. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check PTC's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while HUBS trades at $429.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is -2092.71. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HUBS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check HUBS's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while ZM trades at $71.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 21.96. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check ZM's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while SSNC trades at $87.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 27.39. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check SSNC's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while GRAB trades at $5.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 256.50. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check GRAB's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while GWRE trades at $208.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 503.69. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check GWRE's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while AZPN trades at $264.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AZPN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check AZPN's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, U has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while U trades at $38.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas U's P/E ratio is -35.87. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to U's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check U's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while BSY trades at $51.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 68.13. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check BSY's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while DUOL trades at $329.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 133.99. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check DUOL's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while DT trades at $47.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 29.80. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check DT's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while DOCU trades at $69.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 13.48. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check DOCU's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, QXO has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while QXO trades at $21.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas QXO's P/E ratio is -58.59. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to QXO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to QXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check QXO's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while MANH trades at $215.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 60.17. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check MANH's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while PAYC trades at $216.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 29.28. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check PAYC's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while BKI trades at $75.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check BKI's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while XM trades at $18.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check XM's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while CDAY trades at $69.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CDAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check CDAY's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while PCOR trades at $64.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is -68.01. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check PCOR's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while APPF trades at $265.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 47.89. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check APPF's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while PCTY trades at $171.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 42.78. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check PCTY's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while TTAN trades at $101.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is -27.88. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check TTAN's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while SRAD trades at $31.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 77.50. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check SRAD's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while PEGA trades at $51.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 43.52. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check PEGA's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while MNDY trades at $176.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 231.24. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check MNDY's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while DAY trades at $53.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is 176.30. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DAY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check DAY's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while DSGX trades at $97.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 59.53. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check DSGX's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while NICE trades at $127.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 15.91. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check NICE's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while ESTC trades at $76.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is -74.31. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ESTC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check ESTC's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while OTEX trades at $31.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 19.19. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check OTEX's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while CVLT trades at $183.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 100.01. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check CVLT's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while NATI trades at $59.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check NATI's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while SMAR trades at $56.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SMAR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check SMAR's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while BULL trades at $15.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is 12.91. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BULL's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check BULL's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while GTLB trades at $40.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is 492.00. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GTLB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check GTLB's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, SOUNW has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while SOUNW trades at $7.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas SOUNW's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SOUNW's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to SOUNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check SOUNW's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while IDCC trades at $269.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 19.09. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check IDCC's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while LIF trades at $85.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 224.82. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check LIF's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, SOUN has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while SOUN trades at $16.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas SOUN's P/E ratio is -22.93. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SOUN's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to SOUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check SOUN's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while COUP trades at $80.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check COUP's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while CWAN trades at $19.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CWAN's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check CWAN's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while FROG trades at $42.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is -58.58. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check FROG's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while QTWO trades at $74.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is 1242.17. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to QTWO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check QTWO's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while COMP trades at $8.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is -87.80. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to COMP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check COMP's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while ZETA trades at $17.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is -127.43. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check ZETA's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while CVT trades at $8.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check CVT's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, RIOT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while RIOT trades at $12.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas RIOT's P/E ratio is -28.32. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RIOT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to RIOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check RIOT's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while WK trades at $72.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas WK's P/E ratio is -62.82. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WK's ROE of +1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to WK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check WK's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while BILL trades at $39.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is -2022.00. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check BILL's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while PYCR trades at $22.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check PYCR's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, VERX has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while VERX trades at $25.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas VERX's P/E ratio is -77.67. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VERX's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to VERX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check VERX's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, FRSH has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while FRSH trades at $12.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas FRSH's P/E ratio is -72.67. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FRSH's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to FRSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check FRSH's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while PWSC trades at $22.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check PWSC's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while GBTG trades at $7.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is -65.12. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GBTG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check GBTG's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, CALX has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while CALX trades at $56.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas CALX's P/E ratio is -138.89. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CALX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to CALX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check CALX's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while AYX trades at $48.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check AYX's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while ENV trades at $63.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check ENV's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while INST trades at $23.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check INST's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while RUM trades at $8.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -5.49. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RUM's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to RUM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check RUM's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while ZI trades at $9.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 116.88. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check ZI's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, INTA has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while INTA trades at $41.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas INTA's P/E ratio is -183.13. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INTA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to INTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check INTA's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, ASAN has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while ASAN trades at $13.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas ASAN's P/E ratio is -13.86. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASAN's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to ASAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check ASAN's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, NCNO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while NCNO trades at $27.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas NCNO's P/E ratio is -111.00. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NCNO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to NCNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check NCNO's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, YOU has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while YOU trades at $33.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas YOU's P/E ratio is 20.58. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to YOU's ROE of +1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to YOU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check YOU's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, GRND has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while GRND trades at $16.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas GRND's P/E ratio is -42.45. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GRND's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT and GRND have similar daily volatility (2.69).Check GRND's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, RUMBW has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while RUMBW trades at $2.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas RUMBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RUMBW's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to RUMBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check RUMBW's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, BL has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while BL trades at $50.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas BL's P/E ratio is 39.40. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to BL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check BL's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, BLKB has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while BLKB trades at $62.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas BLKB's P/E ratio is -11.53. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BLKB's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to BLKB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check BLKB's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, AGYS has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while AGYS trades at $106.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas AGYS's P/E ratio is 215.98. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AGYS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to AGYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check AGYS's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, NATL has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while NATL trades at $38.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas NATL's P/E ratio is 22.56. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NATL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to NATL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check NATL's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, BRZE has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while BRZE trades at $24.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas BRZE's P/E ratio is -25.25. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BRZE's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to BRZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check BRZE's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, ALRM has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while ALRM trades at $56.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas ALRM's P/E ratio is 23.44. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALRM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to ALRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check ALRM's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, RNG has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while RNG trades at $30.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas RNG's P/E ratio is -236.50. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RNG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to RNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check RNG's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, CLSK has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while CLSK trades at $9.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas CLSK's P/E ratio is 11.34. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CLSK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to CLSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check CLSK's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while DAVE trades at $201.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 53.28. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check DAVE's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, BTDR has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while BTDR trades at $13.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas BTDR's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BTDR's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to BTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check BTDR's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, DV has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while DV trades at $15.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas DV's P/E ratio is 51.06. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to DV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check DV's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, DAVEW has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while DAVEW trades at $1.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas DAVEW's P/E ratio is -6.56. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DAVEW's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to DAVEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check DAVEW's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.3B. In comparison, DCT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $14.62, while DCT trades at $18.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 68.78, whereas DCT's P/E ratio is -172.64. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DCT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to DCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check DCT's competition here