Lyft, Inc.
Lyft, Inc. LYFT Peers
See (LYFT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LYFT | $15.93 | +1.08% | 6.7B | 107.93 | $0.15 | N/A |
| SAP | $297.56 | -2.15% | 350.7B | 53.88 | $5.58 | +0.87% |
| CRM | $266.95 | -2.11% | 260B | 42.49 | $6.40 | +0.60% |
| INTU | $772.12 | -1.97% | 217.5B | 63.64 | $12.25 | +0.52% |
| NOW | $1,005.60 | -2.19% | 209.6B | 137.28 | $7.37 | N/A |
| UBER | $93.73 | +0.46% | 192.8B | 16.15 | $5.71 | N/A |
| SHOP | $114.06 | -1.12% | 146.7B | 91.60 | $1.23 | N/A |
| APP | $341.45 | -2.47% | 113.9B | 60.88 | $5.53 | N/A |
| MSTR | $384.10 | -4.98% | 102.1B | -16.78 | -$22.25 | N/A |
| CDNS | $308.86 | +0.23% | 84.5B | 78.34 | $3.95 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LYFT vs SAP Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 350.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while SAP trades at $297.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 53.88. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs CRM Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 260B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while CRM trades at $266.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 42.49. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs INTU Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 217.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while INTU trades at $772.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 63.64. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs NOW Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 209.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while NOW trades at $1,005.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 137.28. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs UBER Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 192.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while UBER trades at $93.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 16.15. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs SHOP Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 146.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while SHOP trades at $114.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 91.60. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs APP Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 113.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while APP trades at $341.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 60.88. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs MSTR Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 102.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while MSTR trades at $384.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -16.78. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs CDNS Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 84.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while CDNS trades at $308.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 78.34. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs SNOW Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 72B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while SNOW trades at $216.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is -51.40. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs ADSK Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 66.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while ADSK trades at $308.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 66.74. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs WDAY Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 63.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while WDAY trades at $235.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 132.17. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs TEAM Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 54.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while TEAM trades at $205.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is -125.88. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs DDOG Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 45.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while DDOG trades at $134.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 281.55. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs FICO Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 44.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while FICO trades at $1,829.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 79.08. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs TTD Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, TTD has a market cap of 36.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while TTD trades at $73.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas TTD's P/E ratio is 89.62. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TTD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to TTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs ANSS Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 31B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while ANSS trades at $351.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 52.47. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs STRK Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while STRK trades at $118.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs HUBS Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while HUBS trades at $544.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is -1298.07. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HUBS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs STRF Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while STRF trades at $114.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT and STRF have similar daily volatility (1.72).
LYFT vs TYL Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while TYL trades at $582.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 88.75. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs ZM Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while ZM trades at $77.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 23.29. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs PTC Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while PTC trades at $172.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 47.55. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs SSNC Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while SSNC trades at $82.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 25.88. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs GRAB Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while GRAB trades at $5.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 493.00. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs GWRE Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while GWRE trades at $228.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 537.98. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs DUOL Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while DUOL trades at $398.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 199.53. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs AZPN Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while AZPN trades at $264.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AZPN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs DT Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while DT trades at $54.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 34.23. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs BSY Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while BSY trades at $53.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 68.83. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs DOCU Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while DOCU trades at $77.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 14.71. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs MNDY Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while MNDY trades at $304.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 300.75. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs PAYC Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while PAYC trades at $225.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 33.20. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs QXO Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, QXO has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while QXO trades at $21.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas QXO's P/E ratio is -60.51. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to QXO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to QXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs MANH Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while MANH trades at $198.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 56.57. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs BKI Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while BKI trades at $75.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs XM Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while XM trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs CDAY Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while CDAY trades at $69.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CDAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs NICE Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while NICE trades at $168.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 23.39. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs PCOR Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while PCOR trades at $69.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is -81.05. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs PCTY Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while PCTY trades at $177.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 45.35. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs U Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, U has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while U trades at $23.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas U's P/E ratio is -21.45. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to U's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs TTAN Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while TTAN trades at $109.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is -29.37. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs DAY Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while DAY trades at $55.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is 352.94. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs ESTC Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while ESTC trades at $83.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is -80.50. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ESTC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs DSGX Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while DSGX trades at $100.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 61.84. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs SRAD Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while SRAD trades at $27.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 138.45. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs APPF Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while APPF trades at $229.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 42.80. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs NATI Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while NATI trades at $59.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs SMAR Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while SMAR trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs OTEX Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while OTEX trades at $29.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs CVLT Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while CVLT trades at $171.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 102.09. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs GTLB Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while GTLB trades at $45.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is 505.67. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GTLB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs CWAN Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while CWAN trades at $21.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is 12.88. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CWAN's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs COUP Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while COUP trades at $80.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs BULL Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while BULL trades at $12.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is 10.13. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BULL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs QTWO Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while QTWO trades at $91.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is -272.43. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to QTWO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs IDCC Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while IDCC trades at $220.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 17.54. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs VERX Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, VERX has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while VERX trades at $34.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas VERX's P/E ratio is -122.00. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VERX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to VERX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs LIF Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while LIF trades at $63.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 495.23. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LIF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs FROG Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while FROG trades at $42.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is -60.01. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs ETWO-WT Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, ETWO-WT has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while ETWO-WT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas ETWO-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ETWO-WT's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to ETWO-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs BILL Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while BILL trades at $45.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is -2302.50. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs DAVEW Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, DAVEW has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while DAVEW trades at $1.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas DAVEW's P/E ratio is -8.35. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DAVEW's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to DAVEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs PEGA Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while PEGA trades at $52.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 48.61. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs FRSH Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, FRSH has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while FRSH trades at $14.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas FRSH's P/E ratio is -63.25. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FRSH's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to FRSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs GRND Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, GRND has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while GRND trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas GRND's P/E ratio is -36.43. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GRND's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to GRND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs RUMBW Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, RUMBW has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while RUMBW trades at $3.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas RUMBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RUMBW's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to RUMBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs SOUN Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, SOUN has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while SOUN trades at $11.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas SOUN's P/E ratio is -17.18. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SOUN's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to SOUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs CVT Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while CVT trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs PYCR Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while PYCR trades at $22.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs RIOT Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, RIOT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while RIOT trades at $11.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas RIOT's P/E ratio is -8.23. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RIOT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to RIOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs RUM Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while RUM trades at $9.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -6.27. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RUM's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to RUM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs INTA Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, INTA has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while INTA trades at $48.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas INTA's P/E ratio is -203.42. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to INTA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to INTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs WK Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while WK trades at $68.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas WK's P/E ratio is -58.86. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WK's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to WK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs PWSC Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while PWSC trades at $22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs ZI Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while ZI trades at $10.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 85.92. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs BL Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, BL has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while BL trades at $56.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas BL's P/E ratio is 41.63. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BL's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to BL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs ZETA Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while ZETA trades at $15.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is -60.54. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs AYX Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while AYX trades at $48.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs ENV Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while ENV trades at $63.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs DAVE Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while DAVE trades at $260.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 73.02. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs INST Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while INST trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs CALX Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, CALX has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while CALX trades at $52.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas CALX's P/E ratio is -100.79. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CALX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to CALX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs KC Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, KC has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while KC trades at $11.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas KC's P/E ratio is -11.42. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KC's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to KC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs COMP Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while COMP trades at $6.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is -48.73. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to COMP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs AGYS Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, AGYS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while AGYS trades at $112.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas AGYS's P/E ratio is 140.48. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AGYS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to AGYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs ASAN Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, ASAN has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while ASAN trades at $13.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas ASAN's P/E ratio is -13.66. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ASAN's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to ASAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs NCNO Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, NCNO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while NCNO trades at $27.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas NCNO's P/E ratio is -110.88. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NCNO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to NCNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs BLKB Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, BLKB has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while BLKB trades at $65.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas BLKB's P/E ratio is -11.74. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BLKB's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to BLKB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs BRZE Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, BRZE has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while BRZE trades at $28.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas BRZE's P/E ratio is -27.89. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BRZE's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to BRZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs CLSK Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, CLSK has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while CLSK trades at $11.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas CLSK's P/E ratio is -9.98. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CLSK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to CLSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs ALIT Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, ALIT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while ALIT trades at $5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas ALIT's P/E ratio is -96.50. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ALIT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to ALIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs ALKT Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, ALKT has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while ALKT trades at $29.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas ALKT's P/E ratio is -79.86. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ALKT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to ALKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs GBTG Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while GBTG trades at $6.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is -63.50. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GBTG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs ALRM Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, ALRM has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while ALRM trades at $56.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas ALRM's P/E ratio is 24.07. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ALRM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to ALRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs PAR Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, PAR has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while PAR trades at $66.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas PAR's P/E ratio is -26.19. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PAR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to PAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs RNG Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, RNG has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while RNG trades at $29.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas RNG's P/E ratio is -67.98. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RNG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to RNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.
LYFT vs YOU Comparison
LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 6.7B. In comparison, YOU has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $15.93, while YOU trades at $28.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 107.93, whereas YOU's P/E ratio is 17.28. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +0.08%, compared to YOU's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to YOU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.