Lyft, Inc.

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 236.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while SAP trades at $200.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 27.34. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check SAP's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 176.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while CRM trades at $185.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 24.76. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check CRM's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 164.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while SHOP trades at $123.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 134.26. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check SHOP's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 153.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while UBER trades at $72.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 15.62. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check UBER's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 141.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while APP trades at $412.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 41.66. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.49%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check APP's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 109.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while NOW trades at $107.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 62.45. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check NOW's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 105.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while INTU trades at $381.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 26.12. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check INTU's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 80.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while CDNS trades at $296.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 78.59. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check CDNS's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 59B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while SNOW trades at $179.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is -42.92. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check SNOW's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 48.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while ADSK trades at $229.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 44.25. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check ADSK's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 40.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while DDOG trades at $120.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 385.53. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check DDOG's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 36.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while WDAY trades at $140.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 59.40. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check WDAY's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 36.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while MSTR trades at $129.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -8.60. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check MSTR's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while ANSS trades at $374.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 55.53. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check ANSS's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while FICO trades at $1,352.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 49.92. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check FICO's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while STRF trades at $100.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check STRF's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, STRC has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while STRC trades at $99.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas STRC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to STRC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to STRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check STRC's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while ZM trades at $90.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 17.57. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check ZM's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, GTOP has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while GTOP trades at $37.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas GTOP's P/E ratio is 36.95. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to GTOP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to GTOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check GTOP's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while STRK trades at $78.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check STRK's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while TEAM trades at $80.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is -105.53. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check TEAM's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while PTC trades at $154.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 22.82. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check PTC's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while SSNC trades at $71.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 22.66. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check SSNC's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while GRAB trades at $4.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 73.00. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check GRAB's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while AZPN trades at $264.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to AZPN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check AZPN's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while TYL trades at $319.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 44.11. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check TYL's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, FIG has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while FIG trades at $25.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas FIG's P/E ratio is -8.09. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to FIG's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to FIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check FIG's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while HUBS trades at $239.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is 268.30. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to HUBS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check HUBS's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, TTD has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while TTD trades at $25.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas TTD's P/E ratio is 28.52. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to TTD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to TTD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check TTD's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while BKI trades at $75.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check BKI's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, BVC has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while BVC trades at $7.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas BVC's P/E ratio is -99.43. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to BVC's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to BVC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check BVC's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while DAY trades at $69.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is -73.54. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to DAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check DAY's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while XM trades at $18.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check XM's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while GWRE trades at $128.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 120.52. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check GWRE's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while CDAY trades at $69.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to CDAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check CDAY's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while DT trades at $36.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 59.03. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check DT's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, YMM has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while YMM trades at $9.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas YMM's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to YMM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to YMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check YMM's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while BSY trades at $34.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 41.27. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check BSY's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while IDCC trades at $348.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 30.38. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check IDCC's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while DOCU trades at $44.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 31.10. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check DOCU's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while MANH trades at $143.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 40.08. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check MANH's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, OCFT has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while OCFT trades at $7.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas OCFT's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to OCFT's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to OCFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check OCFT's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while PCOR trades at $52.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is -78.15. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check PCOR's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while NATI trades at $59.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check NATI's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, U has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while U trades at $18.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas U's P/E ratio is -19.03. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to U's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check U's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while SMAR trades at $56.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check SMAR's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while PEGA trades at $44.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 21.30. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check PEGA's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, MTCH has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while MTCH trades at $30.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas MTCH's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to MTCH's ROE of -2.75%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to MTCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check MTCH's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while NICE trades at $111.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check NICE's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while CWAN trades at $23.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is 14.94. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to CWAN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check CWAN's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while PAYC trades at $120.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 14.18. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check PAYC's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while TTAN trades at $66.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is -8.17. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check TTAN's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while OTEX trades at $24.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 14.48. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check OTEX's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while APPF trades at $176.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 44.39. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check APPF's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, OS has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while OS trades at $23.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas OS's P/E ratio is -48.94. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to OS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to OS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check OS's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while ESTC trades at $62.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is -56.98. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to ESTC's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check ESTC's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while COUP trades at $80.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check COUP's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while DSGX trades at $66.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 37.69. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check DSGX's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while PCTY trades at $108.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 24.86. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check PCTY's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while COMP trades at $10.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is -93.55. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to COMP's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check COMP's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while SRAD trades at $17.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 52.24. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check SRAD's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while DUOL trades at $111.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check DUOL's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while BILL trades at $46.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is -200.87. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to BILL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check BILL's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while FROG trades at $50.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is -60.89. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check FROG's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while GTLB trades at $28.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is -94.25. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to GTLB's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check GTLB's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while CVT trades at $8.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check CVT's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while PYCR trades at $22.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check PYCR's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while ZETA trades at $15.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is -203.94. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check ZETA's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while CVLT trades at $92.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 47.40. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check CVLT's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while LIF trades at $50.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 136.78. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to LIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check LIF's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while MNDY trades at $76.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 33.74. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check MNDY's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, KC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while KC trades at $13.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas KC's P/E ratio is -25.61. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to KC's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to KC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check KC's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while PWSC trades at $22.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check PWSC's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, CALX has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while CALX trades at $54.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas CALX's P/E ratio is 213.96. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to CALX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to CALX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check CALX's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, RNG has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while RNG trades at $29.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas RNG's P/E ratio is 282.11. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to RNG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to RNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check RNG's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while AYX trades at $48.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check AYX's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while ENV trades at $63.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check ENV's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while INST trades at $23.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check INST's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while WK trades at $59.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas WK's P/E ratio is -74.10. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to WK's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to WK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check WK's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while ZI trades at $9.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 77.92. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check ZI's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, SOUN has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while SOUN trades at $7.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas SOUN's P/E ratio is -8.69. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to SOUN's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to SOUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check SOUN's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, YOU has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while YOU trades at $33.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas YOU's P/E ratio is 20.63. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to YOU's ROE of +1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to YOU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check YOU's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while QTWO trades at $51.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is 63.48. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to QTWO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check QTWO's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, NATL has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while NATL trades at $42.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas NATL's P/E ratio is 24.06. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to NATL's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to NATL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check NATL's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, STUB has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while STUB trades at $8.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas STUB's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to STUB's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to STUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check STUB's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while BULL trades at $5.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is -5.63. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to BULL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check BULL's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, DBD has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while DBD trades at $81.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas DBD's P/E ratio is 31.97. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to DBD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to DBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check DBD's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while GBTG trades at $5.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is 543.00. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to GBTG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check GBTG's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, FSLY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while FSLY trades at $18.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas FSLY's P/E ratio is -21.78. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to FSLY's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to FSLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check FSLY's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while RUM trades at $5.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -4.36. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to RUM's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to RUM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check RUM's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, DCT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while DCT trades at $18.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas DCT's P/E ratio is -172.64. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to DCT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to DCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check DCT's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, CLSK has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while CLSK trades at $9.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas CLSK's P/E ratio is -9.10. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to CLSK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to CLSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check CLSK's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, SPNS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while SPNS trades at $43.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas SPNS's P/E ratio is 37.78. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to SPNS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to SPNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check SPNS's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while DAVE trades at $178.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 17.42. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check DAVE's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, NAVN has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while NAVN trades at $10.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas NAVN's P/E ratio is -6.74. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to NAVN's ROE of -2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to NAVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check NAVN's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, BLKB has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while BLKB trades at $49.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas BLKB's P/E ratio is 20.73. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to BLKB's ROE of +1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to BLKB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check BLKB's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, ALRM has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while ALRM trades at $45.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas ALRM's P/E ratio is 19.32. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to ALRM's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to ALRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check ALRM's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, BL has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while BL trades at $37.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas BL's P/E ratio is 92.69. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to BL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is more volatile compared to BL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check BL's competition here

LYFT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYFT stands at 5.6B. In comparison, AGYS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYFT is priced at $13.90, while AGYS trades at $78.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYFT currently has a P/E ratio of 2.05, whereas AGYS's P/E ratio is 73.50. In terms of profitability, LYFT's ROE is +2.10%, compared to AGYS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LYFT is less volatile compared to AGYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYFT.Check AGYS's competition here