Intralinks Holdings, Inc.
Intralinks Holdings, Inc. (IL&FSTRANS.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (IL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: NaN Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IL | $13.01 | +0.00% | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VSMPX | $309.76 | -0.32% | 2.1T | 26.64 | $11.53 | +1.13% |
| VFIAX | $637.04 | -0.27% | 1.5T | 27.50 | $22.99 | +1.12% |
| VIGIX | $238.79 | -0.25% | 349.9B | 34.85 | $6.78 | +0.44% |
| CLBAX | $38.89 | +0.00% | 274.8B | 27.22 | $1.42 | N/A |
| CGFAX | $77.42 | -0.59% | 271.5B | 28.95 | $2.65 | N/A |
| VVIAX | $80.43 | -0.32% | 227.4B | 21.65 | $3.70 | +1.92% |
| FFICX | $63.35 | -0.31% | 178.4B | 27.67 | $2.27 | N/A |
| CICAX | $63.09 | -0.33% | 176.7B | 27.66 | $2.27 | N/A |
| FUNFX | $95.38 | -0.39% | 166.6B | 27.54 | $3.43 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
IL vs VSMPX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, VSMPX has a market cap of 2.1T. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while VSMPX trades at $309.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSMPX's P/E ratio is 26.64. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to VSMPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to VSMPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check VSMPX's competition here
IL vs VFIAX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, VFIAX has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while VFIAX trades at $637.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VFIAX's P/E ratio is 27.50. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to VFIAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to VFIAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check VFIAX's competition here
IL vs VIGIX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, VIGIX has a market cap of 349.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while VIGIX trades at $238.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIGIX's P/E ratio is 34.85. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to VIGIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to VIGIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check VIGIX's competition here
IL vs CLBAX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, CLBAX has a market cap of 274.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while CLBAX trades at $38.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLBAX's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to CLBAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to CLBAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check CLBAX's competition here
IL vs CGFAX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, CGFAX has a market cap of 271.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while CGFAX trades at $77.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGFAX's P/E ratio is 28.95. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to CGFAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to CGFAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check CGFAX's competition here
IL vs VVIAX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, VVIAX has a market cap of 227.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while VVIAX trades at $80.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VVIAX's P/E ratio is 21.65. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to VVIAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to VVIAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check VVIAX's competition here
IL vs FFICX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, FFICX has a market cap of 178.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while FFICX trades at $63.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFICX's P/E ratio is 27.67. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FFICX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to FFICX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check FFICX's competition here
IL vs CICAX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, CICAX has a market cap of 176.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while CICAX trades at $63.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CICAX's P/E ratio is 27.66. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to CICAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to CICAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check CICAX's competition here
IL vs FUNFX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, FUNFX has a market cap of 166.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while FUNFX trades at $95.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FUNFX's P/E ratio is 27.54. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FUNFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to FUNFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check FUNFX's competition here
IL vs VSMAX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, VSMAX has a market cap of 166.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while VSMAX trades at $132.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSMAX's P/E ratio is 21.30. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to VSMAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to VSMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check VSMAX's competition here
IL vs VEMRX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, VEMRX has a market cap of 151.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while VEMRX trades at $122.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VEMRX's P/E ratio is 17.44. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to VEMRX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to VEMRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check VEMRX's competition here
IL vs FIFAX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, FIFAX has a market cap of 144.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while FIFAX trades at $27.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIFAX's P/E ratio is 19.75. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FIFAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to FIFAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check FIFAX's competition here
IL vs JJEB Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, JJEB has a market cap of 121.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while JJEB trades at $51.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JJEB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to JJEB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IL is less volatile compared to JJEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check JJEB's competition here
IL vs COWB Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, COWB has a market cap of 112.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while COWB trades at $47.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COWB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to COWB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to COWB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check COWB's competition here
IL vs JJTB Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, JJTB has a market cap of 112.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while JJTB trades at $47.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JJTB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to JJTB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IL is less volatile compared to JJTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check JJTB's competition here
IL vs BALB Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, BALB has a market cap of 111.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while BALB trades at $47.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BALB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BALB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IL is less volatile compared to BALB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check BALB's competition here
IL vs JJGB Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, JJGB has a market cap of 111.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while JJGB trades at $47.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JJGB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to JJGB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to JJGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check JJGB's competition here
IL vs JJAB Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, JJAB has a market cap of 107.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while JJAB trades at $45.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JJAB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to JJAB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to JJAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check JJAB's competition here
IL vs BJJN Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, BJJN has a market cap of 107.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while BJJN trades at $45.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BJJN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BJJN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IL is less volatile compared to BJJN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check BJJN's competition here
IL vs JJUB Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, JJUB has a market cap of 106.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while JJUB trades at $45.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JJUB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to JJUB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to JJUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check JJUB's competition here
IL vs JJSB Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, JJSB has a market cap of 102.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while JJSB trades at $43.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JJSB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to JJSB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to JJSB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check JJSB's competition here
IL vs JJPB Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, JJPB has a market cap of 102B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while JJPB trades at $43.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JJPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to JJPB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IL is less volatile compared to JJPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check JJPB's competition here
IL vs SGGB Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, SGGB has a market cap of 101.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while SGGB trades at $43.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGGB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SGGB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IL is less volatile compared to SGGB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check SGGB's competition here
IL vs CFAAX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, CFAAX has a market cap of 100.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while CFAAX trades at $11.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CFAAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to CFAAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to CFAAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check CFAAX's competition here
IL vs JJMB Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, JJMB has a market cap of 100.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while JJMB trades at $42.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JJMB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to JJMB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to JJMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check JJMB's competition here
IL vs JJCB Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, JJCB has a market cap of 99.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while JJCB trades at $42.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JJCB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to JJCB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to JJCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check JJCB's competition here
IL vs VEXAX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, VEXAX has a market cap of 98.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while VEXAX trades at $164.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VEXAX's P/E ratio is 20.18. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to VEXAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to VEXAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check VEXAX's competition here
IL vs BJO Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, BJO has a market cap of 97.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while BJO trades at $41.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BJO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BJO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IL is less volatile compared to BJO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check BJO's competition here
IL vs PGMB Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, PGMB has a market cap of 97.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while PGMB trades at $41.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PGMB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to PGMB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to PGMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check PGMB's competition here
IL vs FRIAX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, FRIAX has a market cap of 87.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while FRIAX trades at $2.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRIAX's P/E ratio is 19.70. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FRIAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to FRIAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check FRIAX's competition here
IL vs VWIUX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, VWIUX has a market cap of 86.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while VWIUX trades at $14.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VWIUX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to VWIUX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to VWIUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check VWIUX's competition here
IL vs CSPAX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, CSPAX has a market cap of 84.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while CSPAX trades at $77.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSPAX's P/E ratio is 24.59. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to CSPAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to CSPAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check CSPAX's competition here
IL vs VEMPX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, VEMPX has a market cap of 84.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while VEMPX trades at $405.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VEMPX's P/E ratio is 20.18. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to VEMPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to VEMPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check VEMPX's competition here
IL vs CNWAX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, CNWAX has a market cap of 79.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while CNWAX trades at $100.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNWAX's P/E ratio is 22.07. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to CNWAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to CNWAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check CNWAX's competition here
IL vs VGSNX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, VGSNX has a market cap of 65.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while VGSNX trades at $20.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGSNX's P/E ratio is 33.42. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to VGSNX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to VGSNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check VGSNX's competition here
IL vs VSIAX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, VSIAX has a market cap of 62.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while VSIAX trades at $98.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSIAX's P/E ratio is 17.85. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to VSIAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to VSIAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check VSIAX's competition here
IL vs IBIT Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, IBIT has a market cap of 61.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while IBIT trades at $39.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBIT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to IBIT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IL is less volatile compared to IBIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check IBIT's competition here
IL vs HIPO-WT Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, HIPO-WT has a market cap of 55.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while HIPO-WT trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HIPO-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to HIPO-WT's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, IL is less volatile compared to HIPO-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check HIPO-WT's competition here
IL vs ANEFX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, ANEFX has a market cap of 44.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while ANEFX trades at $74.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANEFX's P/E ratio is 30.37. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ANEFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to ANEFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check ANEFX's competition here
IL vs MFEKX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, MFEKX has a market cap of 42.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while MFEKX trades at $190.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MFEKX's P/E ratio is 34.69. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to MFEKX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to MFEKX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check MFEKX's competition here
IL vs DFIEX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, DFIEX has a market cap of 40.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while DFIEX trades at $22.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFIEX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to DFIEX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to DFIEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check DFIEX's competition here
IL vs DFEOX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, DFEOX has a market cap of 38.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while DFEOX trades at $51.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFEOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to DFEOX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to DFEOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check DFEOX's competition here
IL vs DFQTX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, DFQTX has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while DFQTX trades at $45.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFQTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to DFQTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to DFQTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check DFQTX's competition here
IL vs FOCPX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, FOCPX has a market cap of 36.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while FOCPX trades at $24.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FOCPX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FOCPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to FOCPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check FOCPX's competition here
IL vs DFCEX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, DFCEX has a market cap of 35.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while DFCEX trades at $33.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFCEX's P/E ratio is 17.54. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to DFCEX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to DFCEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check DFCEX's competition here
IL vs VSGAX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, VSGAX has a market cap of 34.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while VSGAX trades at $112.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSGAX's P/E ratio is 31.26. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to VSGAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to VSGAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check VSGAX's competition here
IL vs VMVAX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, VMVAX has a market cap of 34.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while VMVAX trades at $100.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VMVAX's P/E ratio is 20.14. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to VMVAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to VMVAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check VMVAX's competition here
IL vs FGOMX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, FGOMX has a market cap of 34.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while FGOMX trades at $18.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FGOMX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FGOMX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to FGOMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check FGOMX's competition here
IL vs FFFFX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, FFFFX has a market cap of 33.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while FFFFX trades at $14.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFFFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FFFFX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to FFFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check FFFFX's competition here
IL vs FSNVX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, FSNVX has a market cap of 33.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while FSNVX trades at $14.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSNVX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FSNVX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to FSNVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check FSNVX's competition here
IL vs SWTSX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, SWTSX has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while SWTSX trades at $16.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWTSX's P/E ratio is 26.62. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SWTSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to SWTSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check SWTSX's competition here
IL vs FSELX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, FSELX has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while FSELX trades at $49.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSELX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FSELX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to FSELX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check FSELX's competition here
IL vs RFKTX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, RFKTX has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while RFKTX trades at $31.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RFKTX's P/E ratio is 25.95. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to RFKTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to RFKTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check RFKTX's competition here
IL vs TRFHX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, TRFHX has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while TRFHX trades at $28.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRFHX's P/E ratio is 23.86. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to TRFHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to TRFHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check TRFHX's competition here
IL vs PEMGX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, PEMGX has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while PEMGX trades at $39.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PEMGX's P/E ratio is 33.78. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to PEMGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to PEMGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check PEMGX's competition here
IL vs BBGLX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, BBGLX has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while BBGLX trades at $24.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBGLX's P/E ratio is 31.60. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BBGLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to BBGLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check BBGLX's competition here
IL vs FKDNX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, FKDNX has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while FKDNX trades at $175.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FKDNX's P/E ratio is 37.37. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FKDNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to FKDNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check FKDNX's competition here
IL vs RITGX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, RITGX has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while RITGX trades at $9.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RITGX's P/E ratio is 49.36. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to RITGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to RITGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check RITGX's competition here
IL vs BHYIX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, BHYIX has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while BHYIX trades at $7.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHYIX's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BHYIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to BHYIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check BHYIX's competition here
IL vs BRHYX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, BRHYX has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while BRHYX trades at $7.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRHYX's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BRHYX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to BRHYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check BRHYX's competition here
IL vs OWLSX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, OWLSX has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while OWLSX trades at $21.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OWLSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to OWLSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to OWLSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check OWLSX's competition here
IL vs FJTKX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, FJTKX has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while FJTKX trades at $16.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FJTKX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FJTKX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to FJTKX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check FJTKX's competition here
IL vs JCPUX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, JCPUX has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while JCPUX trades at $7.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JCPUX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to JCPUX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to JCPUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check JCPUX's competition here
IL vs SOJB Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, SOJB has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while SOJB trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOJB's P/E ratio is 29.81. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SOJB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to SOJB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check SOJB's competition here
IL vs SOJA Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, SOJA has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while SOJA trades at $25.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOJA's P/E ratio is 29.79. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SOJA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to SOJA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check SOJA's competition here
IL vs DFLVX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, DFLVX has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while DFLVX trades at $60.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFLVX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to DFLVX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to DFLVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check DFLVX's competition here
IL vs JVMAX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, JVMAX has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while JVMAX trades at $27.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JVMAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to JVMAX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to JVMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check JVMAX's competition here
IL vs FZTKX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, FZTKX has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while FZTKX trades at $17.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FZTKX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FZTKX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to FZTKX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check FZTKX's competition here
IL vs GQGPX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, GQGPX has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while GQGPX trades at $19.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GQGPX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to GQGPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to GQGPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check GQGPX's competition here
IL vs WCMRX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, WCMRX has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while WCMRX trades at $26.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WCMRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to WCMRX's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to WCMRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check WCMRX's competition here
IL vs MDDVX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, MDDVX has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while MDDVX trades at $21.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDDVX's P/E ratio is 21.37. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to MDDVX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to MDDVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check MDDVX's competition here
IL vs RFUTX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, RFUTX has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while RFUTX trades at $21.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RFUTX's P/E ratio is 25.99. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to RFUTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to RFUTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check RFUTX's competition here
IL vs FSPTX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, FSPTX has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while FSPTX trades at $41.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSPTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FSPTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to FSPTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check FSPTX's competition here
IL vs LZOEX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, LZOEX has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while LZOEX trades at $29.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LZOEX's P/E ratio is 13.07. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to LZOEX's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to LZOEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check LZOEX's competition here
IL vs DFSTX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, DFSTX has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while DFSTX trades at $56.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFSTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to DFSTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to DFSTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check DFSTX's competition here
IL vs RLEMX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, RLEMX has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while RLEMX trades at $28.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RLEMX's P/E ratio is 13.07. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to RLEMX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to RLEMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check RLEMX's competition here
IL vs MKLOX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, MKLOX has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while MKLOX trades at $21.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MKLOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to MKLOX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to MKLOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check MKLOX's competition here
IL vs DFSVX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, DFSVX has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while DFSVX trades at $57.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFSVX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to DFSVX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to DFSVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check DFSVX's competition here
IL vs ILMNV Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, ILMNV has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while ILMNV trades at $107.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ILMNV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ILMNV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to ILMNV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check ILMNV's competition here
IL vs VMBSX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, VMBSX has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while VMBSX trades at $19.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VMBSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to VMBSX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to VMBSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check VMBSX's competition here
IL vs DRUA Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, DRUA has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while DRUA trades at $25.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRUA's P/E ratio is 5.61. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to DRUA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to DRUA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check DRUA's competition here
IL vs DFISX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, DFISX has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while DFISX trades at $28.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFISX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to DFISX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to DFISX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check DFISX's competition here
IL vs TWCGX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, TWCGX has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while TWCGX trades at $54.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TWCGX's P/E ratio is 34.81. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to TWCGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to TWCGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check TWCGX's competition here
IL vs CBTAX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, CBTAX has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while CBTAX trades at $9.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBTAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to CBTAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to CBTAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check CBTAX's competition here
IL vs TEPLX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, TEPLX has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while TEPLX trades at $29.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TEPLX's P/E ratio is 26.20. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to TEPLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to TEPLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check TEPLX's competition here
IL vs DISVX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, DISVX has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while DISVX trades at $35.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DISVX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to DISVX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to DISVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check DISVX's competition here
IL vs DFFVX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, DFFVX has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while DFFVX trades at $40.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFFVX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to DFFVX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to DFFVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check DFFVX's competition here
IL vs FIQZX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, FIQZX has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while FIQZX trades at $10.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIQZX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FIQZX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to FIQZX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check FIQZX's competition here
IL vs HIMFX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, HIMFX has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while HIMFX trades at $15.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HIMFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to HIMFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to HIMFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check HIMFX's competition here
IL vs OTCIX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, OTCIX has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while OTCIX trades at $27.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OTCIX's P/E ratio is 39.07. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to OTCIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to OTCIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check OTCIX's competition here
IL vs DFUSX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, DFUSX has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while DFUSX trades at $45.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFUSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to DFUSX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to DFUSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check DFUSX's competition here
IL vs DFEVX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, DFEVX has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while DFEVX trades at $42.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFEVX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to DFEVX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to DFEVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check DFEVX's competition here
IL vs DFIVX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, DFIVX has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while DFIVX trades at $31.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFIVX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to DFIVX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to DFIVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check DFIVX's competition here
IL vs DFAPX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, DFAPX has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while DFAPX trades at $10.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFAPX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to DFAPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to DFAPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check DFAPX's competition here
IL vs FIGRX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, FIGRX has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while FIGRX trades at $61.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIGRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FIGRX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to FIGRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check FIGRX's competition here
IL vs MRSKX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, MRSKX has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while MRSKX trades at $28.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRSKX's P/E ratio is 20.61. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to MRSKX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to MRSKX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check MRSKX's competition here
IL vs GQLIX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, GQLIX has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while GQLIX trades at $34.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GQLIX's P/E ratio is 5.35. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to GQLIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to GQLIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check GQLIX's competition here
IL vs LIJIX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, LIJIX has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while LIJIX trades at $22.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LIJIX's P/E ratio is 23.15. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to LIJIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to LIJIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check LIJIX's competition here
IL vs HBLFX Comparison February 2026
IL plays a significant role within the NaN sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IL stands at 0. In comparison, HBLFX has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IL is priced at $13.01, while HBLFX trades at $15.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HBLFX's P/E ratio is 20.94. In terms of profitability, IL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to HBLFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IL is more volatile compared to HBLFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IL.Check HBLFX's competition here