HubSpot, Inc.
HubSpot, Inc. HUBS Peers
See (HUBS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUBS | $560.86 | +2.72% | 29.6B | -1304.33 | -$0.43 | N/A |
| SAP | $303.72 | +1.86% | 354.3B | 54.43 | $5.58 | +0.87% |
| CRM | $272.15 | +1.09% | 260.2B | 42.52 | $6.40 | +0.60% |
| INTU | $780.64 | +0.90% | 217.8B | 63.73 | $12.25 | +0.51% |
| NOW | $1,044.69 | +3.46% | 216.4B | 141.75 | $7.37 | N/A |
| UBER | $93.63 | +1.72% | 195.8B | 16.40 | $5.71 | N/A |
| SHOP | $116.52 | +1.52% | 151.7B | 94.73 | $1.23 | N/A |
| APP | $341.64 | +1.68% | 115.6B | 61.78 | $5.53 | N/A |
| MSTR | $403.99 | +0.43% | 110.5B | -18.16 | -$22.25 | N/A |
| CDNS | $326.81 | +5.10% | 89.2B | 82.74 | $3.95 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
HUBS vs SAP Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 354.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while SAP trades at $303.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 54.43. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs CRM Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 260.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while CRM trades at $272.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 42.52. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs INTU Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 217.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while INTU trades at $780.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 63.73. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs NOW Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 216.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while NOW trades at $1,044.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 141.75. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is less volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs UBER Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 195.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while UBER trades at $93.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs SHOP Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 151.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while SHOP trades at $116.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 94.73. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs APP Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 115.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while APP trades at $341.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 61.78. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is less volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs MSTR Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 110.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while MSTR trades at $403.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -18.16. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is less volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs CDNS Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 89.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while CDNS trades at $326.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 82.74. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs SNOW Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 73.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while SNOW trades at $221.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is -52.74. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs ADSK Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 67.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while ADSK trades at $316.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 67.81. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs WDAY Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 64.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while WDAY trades at $241.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 133.57. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs TEAM Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 56.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while TEAM trades at $213.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is -129.41. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is less volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs DDOG Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 53.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while DDOG trades at $155.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 330.11. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is less volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs FICO Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 45.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while FICO trades at $1,855.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 79.70. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs TTD Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, TTD has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while TTD trades at $74.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas TTD's P/E ratio is 90.74. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TTD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to TTD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs ANSS Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 32.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while ANSS trades at $367.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 54.60. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs STRK Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while STRK trades at $120.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs STRF Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while STRF trades at $117.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs TYL Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while TYL trades at $590.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 88.73. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs ZM Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while ZM trades at $78.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 23.60. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs PTC Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while PTC trades at $175.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 48.35. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs SSNC Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while SSNC trades at $83.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 25.93. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs GWRE Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while GWRE trades at $230.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 561.90. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs GRAB Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while GRAB trades at $4.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 487.00. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs DUOL Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while DUOL trades at $391.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 193.99. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is less volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs DT Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while DT trades at $56.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 35.56. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is less volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs AZPN Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while AZPN trades at $264.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AZPN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs BSY Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while BSY trades at $55.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 70.96. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs DOCU Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while DOCU trades at $79.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 15.02. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs MNDY Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while MNDY trades at $307.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 304.36. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs PAYC Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while PAYC trades at $233.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 33.11. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs QXO Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, QXO has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while QXO trades at $21.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas QXO's P/E ratio is -62.80. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to QXO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to QXO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs MANH Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while MANH trades at $199.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 57.12. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs BKI Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while BKI trades at $75.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs XM Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while XM trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs PCOR Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while PCOR trades at $73.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is -85.01. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is less volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs U Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, U has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while U trades at $26.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas U's P/E ratio is -23.33. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to U's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is less volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs CDAY Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while CDAY trades at $69.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CDAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs NICE Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while NICE trades at $170.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 23.74. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs PCTY Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while PCTY trades at $184.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 45.93. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is less volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs TTAN Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while TTAN trades at $109.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is -29.53. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs ESTC Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while ESTC trades at $87.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is -83.85. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ESTC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is less volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs DAY Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while DAY trades at $57.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is 357.94. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs DSGX Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while DSGX trades at $104.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 63.26. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs SRAD Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while SRAD trades at $28.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 141.15. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs APPF Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while APPF trades at $235.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 43.85. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs NATI Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while NATI trades at $59.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs SMAR Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while SMAR trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs CVLT Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while CVLT trades at $174.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 103.28. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs OTEX Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while OTEX trades at $29.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 12.29. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs GTLB Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while GTLB trades at $46.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is 515.22. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GTLB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs LYFT Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while LYFT trades at $16.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 107.67. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs BULL Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while BULL trades at $14.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is 11.49. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BULL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is less volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs CWAN Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while CWAN trades at $22.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is 13.02. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CWAN's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs COUP Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while COUP trades at $80.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs DAVEW Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, DAVEW has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while DAVEW trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas DAVEW's P/E ratio is -10.49. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DAVEW's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is less volatile compared to DAVEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs QTWO Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while QTWO trades at $94.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is -278.21. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to QTWO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs IDCC Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while IDCC trades at $224.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 17.75. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs VERX Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, VERX has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while VERX trades at $35.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas VERX's P/E ratio is -122.24. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VERX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is less volatile compared to VERX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs LIF Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while LIF trades at $65.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 504.46. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LIF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is less volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs BILL Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while BILL trades at $48.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is -2410.50. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is less volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs FROG Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while FROG trades at $42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is -59.15. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs PEGA Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while PEGA trades at $54.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 50.03. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is less volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs FRSH Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, FRSH has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while FRSH trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas FRSH's P/E ratio is -63.33. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FRSH's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is less volatile compared to FRSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs RUMBW Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, RUMBW has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while RUMBW trades at $3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas RUMBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RUMBW's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is less volatile compared to RUMBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs SOUN Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, SOUN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while SOUN trades at $11.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas SOUN's P/E ratio is -18.18. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SOUN's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is less volatile compared to SOUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs GRND Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, GRND has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while GRND trades at $22.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas GRND's P/E ratio is -37.55. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GRND's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to GRND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs ETWO-WT Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, ETWO-WT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while ETWO-WT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas ETWO-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ETWO-WT's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to ETWO-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs RIOT Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, RIOT has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while RIOT trades at $12.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas RIOT's P/E ratio is -8.88. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RIOT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is less volatile compared to RIOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs CVT Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while CVT trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs PYCR Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while PYCR trades at $22.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs RUM Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while RUM trades at $9.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -6.42. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RUM's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is less volatile compared to RUM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs INTA Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, INTA has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while INTA trades at $48.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas INTA's P/E ratio is -200.46. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to INTA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to INTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs WK Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while WK trades at $69.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas WK's P/E ratio is -59.67. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to WK's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to WK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs PWSC Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while PWSC trades at $22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs ZI Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while ZI trades at $10.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 85.92. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is less volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs DAVE Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while DAVE trades at $281.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 78.93. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is less volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs ZETA Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while ZETA trades at $15.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is -61.80. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is less volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs BL Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, BL has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while BL trades at $57.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas BL's P/E ratio is 41.89. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BL's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to BL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs AYX Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while AYX trades at $48.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs CALX Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, CALX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while CALX trades at $53.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas CALX's P/E ratio is -103.71. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CALX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to CALX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs ENV Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while ENV trades at $63.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs INST Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while INST trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs CLSK Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, CLSK has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while CLSK trades at $12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas CLSK's P/E ratio is -11.04. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CLSK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is less volatile compared to CLSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs COMP Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while COMP trades at $6.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is -49.38. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to COMP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs NCNO Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, NCNO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while NCNO trades at $28.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas NCNO's P/E ratio is -114.80. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NCNO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is less volatile compared to NCNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs ASAN Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, ASAN has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while ASAN trades at $13.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas ASAN's P/E ratio is -13.97. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ASAN's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is less volatile compared to ASAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs KC Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, KC has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while KC trades at $12.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas KC's P/E ratio is -11.13. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to KC's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to KC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs AGYS Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, AGYS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while AGYS trades at $115.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas AGYS's P/E ratio is 140.60. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AGYS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is less volatile compared to AGYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs BRZE Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, BRZE has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while BRZE trades at $28.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas BRZE's P/E ratio is -28.50. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BRZE's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to BRZE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs BLKB Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, BLKB has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while BLKB trades at $65.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas BLKB's P/E ratio is -11.74. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BLKB's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to BLKB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs ALKT Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, ALKT has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while ALKT trades at $30.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas ALKT's P/E ratio is -82.81. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ALKT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is less volatile compared to ALKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs ALIT Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, ALIT has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while ALIT trades at $5.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas ALIT's P/E ratio is -99.67. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ALIT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to ALIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs GBTG Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while GBTG trades at $6.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is -64.70. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GBTG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs ALRM Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, ALRM has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while ALRM trades at $57.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas ALRM's P/E ratio is 24.34. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ALRM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to ALRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs PAR Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, PAR has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while PAR trades at $69.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas PAR's P/E ratio is -27.26. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PAR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is less volatile compared to PAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs BTDR Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, BTDR has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while BTDR trades at $13.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas BTDR's P/E ratio is -2.91. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BTDR's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is less volatile compared to BTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.
HUBS vs RNG Comparison
HUBS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBS stands at 29.6B. In comparison, RNG has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBS is priced at $560.86, while RNG trades at $29.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBS currently has a P/E ratio of -1304.33, whereas RNG's P/E ratio is -69.47. In terms of profitability, HUBS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RNG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBS is more volatile compared to RNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBS.