Fortinet, Inc.
Fortinet, Inc. FTNT Peers
See (FTNT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTNT | $104.81 | -1.99% | 80.2B | 42.95 | $2.44 | N/A |
| MSFT | $505.27 | -0.94% | 3.8T | 38.99 | $12.96 | +0.78% |
| ORCL | $237.94 | -2.30% | 668.3B | 54.82 | $4.34 | +0.90% |
| PLTR | $149.07 | -1.79% | 337.3B | 621.13 | $0.24 | N/A |
| ADBE | $372.84 | +1.40% | 158.2B | 23.85 | $15.63 | N/A |
| PANW | $196.73 | -1.58% | 131.2B | 113.06 | $1.74 | N/A |
| CRWD | $471.26 | -2.14% | 117.5B | -663.75 | -$0.71 | N/A |
| SNPS | $615.13 | +4.00% | 113.8B | 71.11 | $8.65 | N/A |
| HOOD | $101.85 | -2.39% | 89.7B | 58.20 | $1.75 | N/A |
| NET | $190.54 | -3.65% | 66B | -793.92 | -$0.24 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FTNT vs MSFT Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, MSFT has a market cap of 3.8T. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while MSFT trades at $505.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas MSFT's P/E ratio is 38.99. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to MSFT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is more volatile compared to MSFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs ORCL Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, ORCL has a market cap of 668.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while ORCL trades at $237.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas ORCL's P/E ratio is 54.82. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to ORCL's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is less volatile compared to ORCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs PLTR Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, PLTR has a market cap of 337.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while PLTR trades at $149.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas PLTR's P/E ratio is 621.13. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to PLTR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is less volatile compared to PLTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs ADBE Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 158.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while ADBE trades at $372.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 23.85. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is more volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs PANW Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, PANW has a market cap of 131.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while PANW trades at $196.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas PANW's P/E ratio is 113.06. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to PANW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is more volatile compared to PANW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs CRWD Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, CRWD has a market cap of 117.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while CRWD trades at $471.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas CRWD's P/E ratio is -663.75. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to CRWD's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is less volatile compared to CRWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs SNPS Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, SNPS has a market cap of 113.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while SNPS trades at $615.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas SNPS's P/E ratio is 71.11. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to SNPS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is less volatile compared to SNPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs HOOD Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, HOOD has a market cap of 89.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while HOOD trades at $101.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas HOOD's P/E ratio is 58.20. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to HOOD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is less volatile compared to HOOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs NET Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, NET has a market cap of 66B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while NET trades at $190.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas NET's P/E ratio is -793.92. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to NET's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is less volatile compared to NET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs CRWV Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, CRWV has a market cap of 63.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while CRWV trades at $129.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas CRWV's P/E ratio is -51.28. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to CRWV's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is less volatile compared to CRWV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs VMW Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, VMW has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while VMW trades at $142.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas VMW's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to VMW's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is more volatile compared to VMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs SQ Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, SQ has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while SQ trades at $83.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas SQ's P/E ratio is 49.98. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to SQ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is more volatile compared to SQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs XYZ Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, XYZ has a market cap of 48.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while XYZ trades at $79.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas XYZ's P/E ratio is 19.25. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to XYZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is more volatile compared to XYZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs ZS Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, ZS has a market cap of 44.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while ZS trades at $285.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas ZS's P/E ratio is -1098.88. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to ZS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is more volatile compared to ZS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs NETE Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, NETE has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while NETE trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas NETE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to NETE's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is less volatile compared to NETE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs TOST Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, TOST has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while TOST trades at $47.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas TOST's P/E ratio is 176.41. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to TOST's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is less volatile compared to TOST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs VRSN Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, VRSN has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while VRSN trades at $287.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas VRSN's P/E ratio is 35.16. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to VRSN's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is more volatile compared to VRSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs SPLK Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, SPLK has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while SPLK trades at $156.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas SPLK's P/E ratio is 103.22. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to SPLK's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is more volatile compared to SPLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs CHKP Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, CHKP has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while CHKP trades at $222.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas CHKP's P/E ratio is 29.48. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to CHKP's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is more volatile compared to CHKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs GDDY Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, GDDY has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while GDDY trades at $169.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas GDDY's P/E ratio is 32.58. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to GDDY's ROE of +2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is more volatile compared to GDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs CPAY Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, CPAY has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while CPAY trades at $334.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas CPAY's P/E ratio is 23.48. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to CPAY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is more volatile compared to CPAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs FLT Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, FLT has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while FLT trades at $303.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas FLT's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to FLT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is more volatile compared to FLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs IOT Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, IOT has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while IOT trades at $37.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas IOT's P/E ratio is -171.68. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to IOT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is more volatile compared to IOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs AFRM Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, AFRM has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while AFRM trades at $65.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas AFRM's P/E ratio is -344.26. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to AFRM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is less volatile compared to AFRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs NTNX Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, NTNX has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while NTNX trades at $74.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas NTNX's P/E ratio is -286.04. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to NTNX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is more volatile compared to NTNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs CYBR Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, CYBR has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while CYBR trades at $381.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas CYBR's P/E ratio is -187.12. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to CYBR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is more volatile compared to CYBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs GEN Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, GEN has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while GEN trades at $30.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas GEN's P/E ratio is 29.63. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to GEN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is more volatile compared to GEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs MDB Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, MDB has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while MDB trades at $224.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas MDB's P/E ratio is -205.78. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to MDB's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is less volatile compared to MDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs FFIV Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, FFIV has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while FFIV trades at $297.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas FFIV's P/E ratio is 28.31. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to FFIV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is more volatile compared to FFIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs KSPI Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, KSPI has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while KSPI trades at $87.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas KSPI's P/E ratio is 8.28. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to KSPI's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is less volatile compared to KSPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs RBRK Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, RBRK has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while RBRK trades at $83.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas RBRK's P/E ratio is 24.14. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to RBRK's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is less volatile compared to RBRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs OKTA Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, OKTA has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while OKTA trades at $95.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas OKTA's P/E ratio is 147.15. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to OKTA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is more volatile compared to OKTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs NLOK Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, NLOK has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while NLOK trades at $21.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas NLOK's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to NLOK's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is less volatile compared to NLOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs AKAM Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, AKAM has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while AKAM trades at $80.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas AKAM's P/E ratio is 26.98. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to AKAM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is more volatile compared to AKAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs SAIL Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, SAIL has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while SAIL trades at $20.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas SAIL's P/E ratio is -12.69. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to SAIL's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is less volatile compared to SAIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs DOX Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, DOX has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while DOX trades at $89.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas DOX's P/E ratio is 18.80. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to DOX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is more volatile compared to DOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs ALTR Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, ALTR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while ALTR trades at $111.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas ALTR's P/E ratio is 699.06. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to ALTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is more volatile compared to ALTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs FOUR Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, FOUR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while FOUR trades at $106.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas FOUR's P/E ratio is 36.58. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to FOUR's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is less volatile compared to FOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs PLAN Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, PLAN has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while PLAN trades at $63.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas PLAN's P/E ratio is -44.82. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to PLAN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is more volatile compared to PLAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs KVYO Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, KVYO has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while KVYO trades at $32.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas KVYO's P/E ratio is -192.65. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to KVYO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is more volatile compared to KVYO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs CFLT Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, CFLT has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while CFLT trades at $26.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas CFLT's P/E ratio is -26.82. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to CFLT's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is less volatile compared to CFLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs WIX Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, WIX has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while WIX trades at $154.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas WIX's P/E ratio is 61.54. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to WIX's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is more volatile compared to WIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs INFA Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, INFA has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while INFA trades at $24.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas INFA's P/E ratio is 816.67. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to INFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is more volatile compared to INFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs DBX Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, DBX has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while DBX trades at $27.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas DBX's P/E ratio is 18.34. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to DBX's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is less volatile compared to DBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs HCP Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, HCP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while HCP trades at $34.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas HCP's P/E ratio is -57.97. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to HCP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is more volatile compared to HCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs JCOM Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, JCOM has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while JCOM trades at $142.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas JCOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to JCOM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is less volatile compared to JCOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs PATH Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, PATH has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while PATH trades at $12.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas PATH's P/E ratio is -104.83. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to PATH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is less volatile compared to PATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs CCCS Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, CCCS has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while CCCS trades at $9.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas CCCS's P/E ratio is 984.00. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to CCCS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is less volatile compared to CCCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs SQSP Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, SQSP has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while SQSP trades at $46.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas SQSP's P/E ratio is -1164.25. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to SQSP's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is more volatile compared to SQSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs NEWR Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, NEWR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while NEWR trades at $86.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas NEWR's P/E ratio is -41.62. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to NEWR's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is more volatile compared to NEWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs S Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, S has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while S trades at $19.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas S's P/E ratio is -14.59. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to S's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is less volatile compared to S. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs VRNS Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, VRNS has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while VRNS trades at $51.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas VRNS's P/E ratio is -64.12. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to VRNS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is more volatile compared to VRNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs WEX Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, WEX has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while WEX trades at $160.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas WEX's P/E ratio is 20.71. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to WEX's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is less volatile compared to WEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs SPSC Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, SPSC has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while SPSC trades at $137.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas SPSC's P/E ratio is 64.59. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to SPSC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is more volatile compared to SPSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs QLYS Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, QLYS has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while QLYS trades at $141.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas QLYS's P/E ratio is 28.85. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to QLYS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is more volatile compared to QLYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs NVEI Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, NVEI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while NVEI trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas NVEI's P/E ratio is 212.44. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to NVEI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is more volatile compared to NVEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs BOX Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while BOX trades at $33.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 25.46. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to BOX's ROE of +1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is more volatile compared to BOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs ACIW Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, ACIW has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while ACIW trades at $45.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas ACIW's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to ACIW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is more volatile compared to ACIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs EEFT Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, EEFT has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while EEFT trades at $103.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas EEFT's P/E ratio is 15.39. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to EEFT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is less volatile compared to EEFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs CORZ Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, CORZ has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while CORZ trades at $13.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas CORZ's P/E ratio is -3.44. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to CORZ's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is less volatile compared to CORZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs TENB Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, TENB has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while TENB trades at $33.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas TENB's P/E ratio is -88.08. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to TENB's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is more volatile compared to TENB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs CORZZ Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, CORZZ has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while CORZZ trades at $13.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas CORZZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to CORZZ's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is more volatile compared to CORZZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs AVPT Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, AVPT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while AVPT trades at $18.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas AVPT's P/E ratio is -143.46. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to AVPT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is less volatile compared to AVPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs ODD Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, ODD has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while ODD trades at $69.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas ODD's P/E ratio is 39.99. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to ODD's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is less volatile compared to ODD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs ESMT Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, ESMT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while ESMT trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas ESMT's P/E ratio is 153.67. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to ESMT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is more volatile compared to ESMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs STNE Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, STNE has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while STNE trades at $14.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas STNE's P/E ratio is -17.75. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to STNE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is less volatile compared to STNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs RELY Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, RELY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while RELY trades at $17.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas RELY's P/E ratio is -574.33. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to RELY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is more volatile compared to RELY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs CLBT Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, CLBT has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while CLBT trades at $14.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas CLBT's P/E ratio is -15.52. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to CLBT's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is more volatile compared to CLBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs SWI Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, SWI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while SWI trades at $18.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas SWI's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to SWI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is more volatile compared to SWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs DLO Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, DLO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while DLO trades at $10.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas DLO's P/E ratio is 22.48. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to DLO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is less volatile compared to DLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs EVOP Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, EVOP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while EVOP trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas EVOP's P/E ratio is -309.00. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to EVOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is more volatile compared to EVOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs MQ Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, MQ has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while MQ trades at $5.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas MQ's P/E ratio is 58.50. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to MQ's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is more volatile compared to MQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs WRD Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, WRD has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while WRD trades at $9.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas WRD's P/E ratio is -7.97. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to WRD's ROE of -1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is less volatile compared to WRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs DOCN Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, DOCN has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while DOCN trades at $28.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas DOCN's P/E ratio is 25.47. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to DOCN's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is less volatile compared to DOCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs PAGS Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, PAGS has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while PAGS trades at $7.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas PAGS's P/E ratio is 6.46. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to PAGS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is less volatile compared to PAGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs PAYO Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, PAYO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while PAYO trades at $6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas PAYO's P/E ratio is 24.45. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to PAYO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is more volatile compared to PAYO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs PGYWW Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, PGYWW has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while PGYWW trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas PGYWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to PGYWW's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is less volatile compared to PGYWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs PGY Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, PGY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while PGY trades at $31.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas PGY's P/E ratio is -6.05. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to PGY's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is less volatile compared to PGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs BB Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, BB has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while BB trades at $3.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas BB's P/E ratio is 198.25. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to BB's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is less volatile compared to BB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs RAMP Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, RAMP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while RAMP trades at $32.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas RAMP's P/E ratio is -824.50. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to RAMP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is more volatile compared to RAMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs APPN Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, APPN has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while APPN trades at $29.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas APPN's P/E ratio is -35.18. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to APPN's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is less volatile compared to APPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs FIVN Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, FIVN has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while FIVN trades at $28.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas FIVN's P/E ratio is -472.67. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to FIVN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is less volatile compared to FIVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs EVTC Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, EVTC has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while EVTC trades at $33.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas EVTC's P/E ratio is 16.90. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to EVTC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is more volatile compared to EVTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs TDC Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, TDC has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while TDC trades at $22.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas TDC's P/E ratio is 15.67. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to TDC's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is more volatile compared to TDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs CORZW Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, CORZW has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while CORZW trades at $7.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas CORZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to CORZW's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is less volatile compared to CORZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs EVCM Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, EVCM has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while EVCM trades at $11.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas EVCM's P/E ratio is -95.33. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to EVCM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is more volatile compared to EVCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs GETVV Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, GETVV has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while GETVV trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas GETVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to GETVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is less volatile compared to GETVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs AVDX Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, AVDX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while AVDX trades at $9.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas AVDX's P/E ratio is 246.25. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to AVDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is more volatile compared to AVDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs FORG Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, FORG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while FORG trades at $23.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas FORG's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to FORG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is less volatile compared to FORG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs GSKY Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, GSKY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while GSKY trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas GSKY's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to GSKY's ROE of +5.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is more volatile compared to GSKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs CSGS Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, CSGS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while CSGS trades at $62.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas CSGS's P/E ratio is 21.35. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to CSGS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is more volatile compared to CSGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs GET Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, GET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while GET trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas GET's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to GET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is less volatile compared to GET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs STER Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, STER has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while STER trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas STER's P/E ratio is -98.47. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to STER's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is more volatile compared to STER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs NTCT Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, NTCT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while NTCT trades at $22.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas NTCT's P/E ratio is -4.46. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to NTCT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is less volatile compared to NTCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs TUYA Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, TUYA has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while TUYA trades at $2.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas TUYA's P/E ratio is 62.75. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to TUYA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is less volatile compared to TUYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs ZUO Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, ZUO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while ZUO trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas ZUO's P/E ratio is -19.65. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to ZUO's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is more volatile compared to ZUO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs SUMO Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, SUMO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while SUMO trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas SUMO's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to SUMO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is more volatile compared to SUMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs GB Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, GB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while GB trades at $7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas GB's P/E ratio is 18.05. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to GB's ROE of +0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is more volatile compared to GB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.
FTNT vs RPD Comparison
FTNT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FTNT stands at 80.2B. In comparison, RPD has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FTNT is priced at $104.81, while RPD trades at $22.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FTNT currently has a P/E ratio of 42.95, whereas RPD's P/E ratio is 55.59. In terms of profitability, FTNT's ROE is +1.62%, compared to RPD's ROE of +9.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FTNT is more volatile compared to RPD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FTNT.