Freshworks Inc.
Freshworks Inc. (FRSH) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FRSH) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRSH | $13.24 | -5.26% | 4B | -75.39 | -$0.18 | N/A |
| SAP | $270.55 | -0.21% | 315.4B | 41.74 | $6.48 | +0.97% |
| CRM | $243.60 | -1.89% | 237B | 38.85 | $6.38 | +0.66% |
| UBER | $95.95 | -0.87% | 198.4B | 16.21 | $5.87 | N/A |
| INTU | $660.22 | -0.37% | 183.3B | 53.59 | $12.26 | +0.63% |
| NOW | $856.77 | -3.38% | 183B | 110.25 | $7.98 | N/A |
| SHOP | $140.16 | -1.38% | 182.6B | 78.07 | $1.80 | N/A |
| APP | $469.11 | +6.21% | 152.4B | 61.82 | $7.29 | N/A |
| MSTR | $343.89 | -3.98% | 97.3B | 24.08 | $14.25 | N/A |
| CDNS | $344.66 | -1.42% | 94.1B | 93.04 | $3.71 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FRSH vs SAP Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 315.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while SAP trades at $270.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 41.74. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check SAP's competition here
FRSH vs CRM Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 237B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while CRM trades at $243.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 38.85. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check CRM's competition here
FRSH vs UBER Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 198.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while UBER trades at $95.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 16.21. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check UBER's competition here
FRSH vs INTU Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 183.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while INTU trades at $660.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 53.59. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check INTU's competition here
FRSH vs NOW Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 183B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while NOW trades at $856.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 110.25. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check NOW's competition here
FRSH vs SHOP Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 182.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while SHOP trades at $140.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 78.07. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check SHOP's competition here
FRSH vs APP Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 152.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while APP trades at $469.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 61.82. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check APP's competition here
FRSH vs MSTR Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 97.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while MSTR trades at $343.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is 24.08. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MSTR's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check MSTR's competition here
FRSH vs CDNS Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 94.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while CDNS trades at $344.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 93.04. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check CDNS's competition here
FRSH vs SNOW Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 65B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while SNOW trades at $195.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is -46.47. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check SNOW's competition here
FRSH vs ADSK Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 61B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while ADSK trades at $283.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 61.10. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check ADSK's competition here
FRSH vs WDAY Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 59.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while WDAY trades at $222.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 124.80. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check WDAY's competition here
FRSH vs DDOG Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 44.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while DDOG trades at $127.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 366.80. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check DDOG's competition here
FRSH vs TEAM Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 44.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while TEAM trades at $165.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is -173.89. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check TEAM's competition here
FRSH vs FICO Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 34.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while FICO trades at $1,416.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 55.59. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check FICO's competition here
FRSH vs ANSS Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while ANSS trades at $374.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 55.53. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check ANSS's competition here
FRSH vs STRF Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 31.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while STRF trades at $111.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to STRF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check STRF's competition here
FRSH vs PTC Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while PTC trades at $213.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 50.32. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check PTC's competition here
FRSH vs TTD Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, TTD has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while TTD trades at $52.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas TTD's P/E ratio is 63.10. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TTD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to TTD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check TTD's competition here
FRSH vs STRK Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while STRK trades at $95.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to STRK's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check STRK's competition here
FRSH vs HUBS Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while HUBS trades at $458.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is -1949.87. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HUBS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check HUBS's competition here
FRSH vs ZM Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while ZM trades at $79.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 21.41. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check ZM's competition here
FRSH vs TYL Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while TYL trades at $551.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 79.16. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check TYL's competition here
FRSH vs SSNC Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while SSNC trades at $89.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 28.20. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check SSNC's competition here
FRSH vs GRAB Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while GRAB trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 250.50. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check GRAB's competition here
FRSH vs GWRE Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while GWRE trades at $211.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 491.30. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check GWRE's competition here
FRSH vs U Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, U has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while U trades at $40.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas U's P/E ratio is -37.53. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to U's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check U's competition here
FRSH vs AZPN Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while AZPN trades at $264.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AZPN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check AZPN's competition here
FRSH vs BSY Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while BSY trades at $53.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 69.17. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check BSY's competition here
FRSH vs DOCU Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while DOCU trades at $72.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 14.06. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check DOCU's competition here
FRSH vs DUOL Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while DUOL trades at $318.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 130.67. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check DUOL's competition here
FRSH vs DT Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while DT trades at $48.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 29.88. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check DT's competition here
FRSH vs QXO Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, QXO has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while QXO trades at $21.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas QXO's P/E ratio is 2.22. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to QXO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to QXO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check QXO's competition here
FRSH vs PAYC Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while PAYC trades at $226.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 31.14. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check PAYC's competition here
FRSH vs MANH Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while MANH trades at $216.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 59.85. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check MANH's competition here
FRSH vs BKI Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while BKI trades at $75.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check BKI's competition here
FRSH vs DAY Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while DAY trades at $69.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is 231.57. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to DAY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check DAY's competition here
FRSH vs XM Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while XM trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check XM's competition here
FRSH vs CDAY Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while CDAY trades at $69.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CDAY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check CDAY's competition here
FRSH vs PCOR Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while PCOR trades at $66.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is -69.19. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check PCOR's competition here
FRSH vs PCTY Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while PCTY trades at $178.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 44.64. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check PCTY's competition here
FRSH vs APPF Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while APPF trades at $275.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 49.69. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check APPF's competition here
FRSH vs SRAD Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while SRAD trades at $31.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 78.83. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check SRAD's competition here
FRSH vs TTAN Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while TTAN trades at $102.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is -27.35. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check TTAN's competition here
FRSH vs PEGA Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while PEGA trades at $52.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 43.30. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check PEGA's competition here
FRSH vs MNDY Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while MNDY trades at $175.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 230.78. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check MNDY's competition here
FRSH vs NICE Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while NICE trades at $139.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 16.82. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check NICE's competition here
FRSH vs DSGX Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while DSGX trades at $99.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 60.18. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check DSGX's competition here
FRSH vs ESTC Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while ESTC trades at $77.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is -75.95. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ESTC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check ESTC's competition here
FRSH vs OTEX Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while OTEX trades at $32.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 19.53. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check OTEX's competition here
FRSH vs NATI Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while NATI trades at $59.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check NATI's competition here
FRSH vs SMAR Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while SMAR trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SMAR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check SMAR's competition here
FRSH vs CVLT Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while CVLT trades at $178.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 99.13. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check CVLT's competition here
FRSH vs GTLB Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while GTLB trades at $44.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is 502.56. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GTLB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check GTLB's competition here
FRSH vs BULL Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while BULL trades at $14.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is 12.06. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BULL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check BULL's competition here
FRSH vs LIF Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while LIF trades at $90.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 235.82. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check LIF's competition here
FRSH vs IDCC Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while IDCC trades at $266.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 18.82. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check IDCC's competition here
FRSH vs LYFT Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while LYFT trades at $16.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 74.13. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check LYFT's competition here
FRSH vs COUP Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while COUP trades at $80.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check COUP's competition here
FRSH vs CWAN Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while CWAN trades at $20.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is 12.81. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CWAN's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check CWAN's competition here
FRSH vs SOUNW Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, SOUNW has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while SOUNW trades at $6.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas SOUNW's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SOUNW's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to SOUNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check SOUNW's competition here
FRSH vs FROG Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while FROG trades at $46.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is -61.69. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check FROG's competition here
FRSH vs COMP Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while COMP trades at $9.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is -95.30. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to COMP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check COMP's competition here
FRSH vs SOUN Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, SOUN has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while SOUN trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas SOUN's P/E ratio is -17.81. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SOUN's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to SOUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check SOUN's competition here
FRSH vs RIOT Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, RIOT has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while RIOT trades at $13.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas RIOT's P/E ratio is -33.20. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RIOT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to RIOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check RIOT's competition here
FRSH vs QTWO Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while QTWO trades at $76.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is 1288.18. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to QTWO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check QTWO's competition here
FRSH vs ZETA Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while ZETA trades at $19.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is -131.37. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check ZETA's competition here
FRSH vs WK Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while WK trades at $78.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas WK's P/E ratio is -66.01. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WK's ROE of +1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to WK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check WK's competition here
FRSH vs BILL Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while BILL trades at $40.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is -2053.00. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check BILL's competition here
FRSH vs CVT Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while CVT trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check CVT's competition here
FRSH vs PYCR Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while PYCR trades at $22.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check PYCR's competition here
FRSH vs VERX Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, VERX has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while VERX trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas VERX's P/E ratio is -76.85. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to VERX's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to VERX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check VERX's competition here
FRSH vs GBTG Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while GBTG trades at $8.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is -68.08. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GBTG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check GBTG's competition here
FRSH vs CALX Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, CALX has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while CALX trades at $59.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas CALX's P/E ratio is -143.41. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CALX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to CALX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check CALX's competition here
FRSH vs PWSC Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while PWSC trades at $22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check PWSC's competition here
FRSH vs INTA Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, INTA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while INTA trades at $44.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas INTA's P/E ratio is -189.57. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to INTA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to INTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check INTA's competition here
FRSH vs AYX Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while AYX trades at $48.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check AYX's competition here
FRSH vs ENV Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while ENV trades at $63.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check ENV's competition here
FRSH vs INST Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while INST trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check INST's competition here
FRSH vs YOU Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, YOU has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while YOU trades at $36.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas YOU's P/E ratio is 22.11. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to YOU's ROE of +1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to YOU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check YOU's competition here
FRSH vs ZI Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while ZI trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 77.92. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check ZI's competition here
FRSH vs ASAN Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, ASAN has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while ASAN trades at $14.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas ASAN's P/E ratio is -14.14. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ASAN's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to ASAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check ASAN's competition here
FRSH vs NCNO Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, NCNO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while NCNO trades at $28.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas NCNO's P/E ratio is -113.48. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NCNO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to NCNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check NCNO's competition here
FRSH vs RUM Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while RUM trades at $7.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RUM's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to RUM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check RUM's competition here
FRSH vs BL Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, BL has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while BL trades at $53.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas BL's P/E ratio is 41.09. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to BL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check BL's competition here
FRSH vs BLKB Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, BLKB has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while BLKB trades at $65.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas BLKB's P/E ratio is -11.88. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BLKB's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to BLKB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check BLKB's competition here
FRSH vs AGYS Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, AGYS has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while AGYS trades at $108.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas AGYS's P/E ratio is 221.27. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AGYS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to AGYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check AGYS's competition here
FRSH vs GRND Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, GRND has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while GRND trades at $15.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas GRND's P/E ratio is -40.01. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GRND's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to GRND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check GRND's competition here
FRSH vs NATL Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, NATL has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while NATL trades at $40.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas NATL's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NATL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to NATL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check NATL's competition here
FRSH vs ALRM Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, ALRM has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while ALRM trades at $57.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas ALRM's P/E ratio is 24.30. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ALRM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to ALRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check ALRM's competition here
FRSH vs RUMBW Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, RUMBW has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while RUMBW trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas RUMBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RUMBW's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to RUMBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check RUMBW's competition here
FRSH vs RNG Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, RNG has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while RNG trades at $30.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas RNG's P/E ratio is -240.15. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RNG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to RNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check RNG's competition here
FRSH vs BRZE Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, BRZE has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while BRZE trades at $25.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas BRZE's P/E ratio is -25.76. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BRZE's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to BRZE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check BRZE's competition here
FRSH vs DAVE Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while DAVE trades at $199.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 52.38. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check DAVE's competition here
FRSH vs DV Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, DV has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while DV trades at $16.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas DV's P/E ratio is 52.42. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to DV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to DV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check DV's competition here
FRSH vs CLSK Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, CLSK has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while CLSK trades at $9.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas CLSK's P/E ratio is 10.99. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CLSK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to CLSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check CLSK's competition here
FRSH vs ALKT Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, ALKT has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while ALKT trades at $24.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas ALKT's P/E ratio is -65.50. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ALKT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to ALKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check ALKT's competition here
FRSH vs BTDR Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, BTDR has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while BTDR trades at $12.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas BTDR's P/E ratio is -2.73. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BTDR's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to BTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check BTDR's competition here
FRSH vs DCT Comparison August 2025
FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4B. In comparison, DCT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.24, while DCT trades at $18.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -75.39, whereas DCT's P/E ratio is -172.64. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.05%, compared to DCT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to DCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check DCT's competition here