Freshworks Inc.

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 334.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while SAP trades at $287.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 43.95. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check SAP's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 255.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while CRM trades at $267.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 41.92. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check CRM's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 224.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while INTU trades at $806.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 65.77. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check INTU's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 206.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while NOW trades at $993.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 125.07. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check NOW's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 182.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while UBER trades at $87.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 15.26. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check UBER's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 162B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while SHOP trades at $124.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 101.50. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check SHOP's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 122.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while APP trades at $361.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 65.39. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check APP's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 116.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while STRK trades at $106.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check STRK's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 111.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while MSTR trades at $394.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -17.74. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check MSTR's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 100B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while CDNS trades at $366.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 98.99. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check CDNS's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 73B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while SNOW trades at $218.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is -52.10. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check SNOW's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 65.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while ADSK trades at $306.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 65.66. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check ADSK's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 64B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while WDAY trades at $239.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 133.87. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check WDAY's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 52.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while TEAM trades at $200.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is -121.99. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check TEAM's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 51.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while DDOG trades at $150.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 326.67. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check DDOG's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, TTD has a market cap of 41.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while TTD trades at $84.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas TTD's P/E ratio is 103.09. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TTD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to TTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check TTD's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while FICO trades at $1,505.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 64.94. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check FICO's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while ANSS trades at $374.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 55.70. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check ANSS's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while HUBS trades at $548.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is -1217.84. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to HUBS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH and HUBS have similar daily volatility (3.52).Check HUBS's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while STRF trades at $115.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check STRF's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while PTC trades at $204.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 56.25. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check PTC's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while TYL trades at $552.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 83.45. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check TYL's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while ZM trades at $74.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 22.38. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check ZM's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while SSNC trades at $85.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 26.90. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check SSNC's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while GRAB trades at $5.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 531.00. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check GRAB's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while GWRE trades at $224.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 535.21. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check GWRE's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while BSY trades at $58.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 75.27. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check BSY's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while AZPN trades at $264.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AZPN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check AZPN's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while DT trades at $54.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 34.36. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check DT's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while DOCU trades at $79.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 15.19. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check DOCU's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while DUOL trades at $333.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 163.58. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check DUOL's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while MNDY trades at $280.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 283.28. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check MNDY's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, QXO has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while QXO trades at $21.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas QXO's P/E ratio is -60.06. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to QXO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to QXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check QXO's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while PAYC trades at $237.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 33.85. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check PAYC's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while MANH trades at $225.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 63.14. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check MANH's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, U has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while U trades at $32.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas U's P/E ratio is -29.07. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to U's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check U's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while BKI trades at $75.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check BKI's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while PCOR trades at $76.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is -88.74. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check PCOR's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while XM trades at $18.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check XM's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while CDAY trades at $69.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CDAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check CDAY's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while TTAN trades at $118.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is -31.79. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check TTAN's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while PCTY trades at $190.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 47.98. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check PCTY's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while NICE trades at $163.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 22.87. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check NICE's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while PEGA trades at $60.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 49.50. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check PEGA's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while DAY trades at $59.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is 371.88. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to DAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check DAY's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while APPF trades at $260.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 48.52. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check APPF's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while ESTC trades at $88.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is -86.25. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ESTC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check ESTC's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while DSGX trades at $106.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 64.19. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check DSGX's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while SRAD trades at $27.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 139.57. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check SRAD's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while CVLT trades at $193.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 115.04. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check CVLT's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while NATI trades at $59.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check NATI's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while SMAR trades at $56.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check SMAR's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while OTEX trades at $30.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 12.67. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check OTEX's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while GTLB trades at $47.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is 524.33. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GTLB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check GTLB's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while BULL trades at $13.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is 11.04. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BULL's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check BULL's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while COUP trades at $80.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check COUP's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while CWAN trades at $21.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CWAN's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check CWAN's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while LIF trades at $75.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 583.85. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to LIF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check LIF's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while LYFT trades at $14.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 93.60. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check LYFT's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while IDCC trades at $221.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 17.51. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check IDCC's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while QTWO trades at $90.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is -265.94. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to QTWO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check QTWO's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, VERX has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while VERX trades at $33.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas VERX's P/E ratio is -116.00. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to VERX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to VERX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check VERX's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while FROG trades at $43.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is -61.07. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check FROG's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, RIOT has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while RIOT trades at $13.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas RIOT's P/E ratio is -9.93. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to RIOT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to RIOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check RIOT's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while BILL trades at $45.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is -2251.00. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check BILL's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SOUN has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while SOUN trades at $10.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas SOUN's P/E ratio is -17.52. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SOUN's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to SOUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check SOUN's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while CVT trades at $8.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check CVT's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while PYCR trades at $22.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check PYCR's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while COMP trades at $7.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is -56.81. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to COMP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check COMP's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ETWO-WT has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while ETWO-WT trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas ETWO-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ETWO-WT's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to ETWO-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check ETWO-WT's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while PWSC trades at $22.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check PWSC's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while ZI trades at $10.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 85.92. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check ZI's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while WK trades at $67.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas WK's P/E ratio is -57.55. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to WK's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to WK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check WK's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while RUM trades at $8.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -5.91. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to RUM's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to RUM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check RUM's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, RUMBW has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while RUMBW trades at $2.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas RUMBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to RUMBW's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to RUMBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check RUMBW's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CALX has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while CALX trades at $56.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas CALX's P/E ratio is -137.02. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CALX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to CALX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check CALX's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while ZETA trades at $15.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is -62.00. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check ZETA's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ASAN has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while ASAN trades at $15.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas ASAN's P/E ratio is -15.21. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ASAN's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to ASAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check ASAN's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while AYX trades at $48.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check AYX's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while ENV trades at $63.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check ENV's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BL has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while BL trades at $55.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas BL's P/E ratio is 40.40. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BL's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to BL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check BL's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, GRND has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while GRND trades at $17.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas GRND's P/E ratio is -29.41. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GRND's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to GRND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check GRND's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while INST trades at $23.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check INST's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, NCNO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while NCNO trades at $29.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas NCNO's P/E ratio is -119.00. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NCNO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to NCNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check NCNO's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, INTA has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while INTA trades at $40.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas INTA's P/E ratio is -170.46. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to INTA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to INTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check INTA's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, AGYS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while AGYS trades at $118.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas AGYS's P/E ratio is 236.18. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AGYS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to AGYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check AGYS's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CLSK has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while CLSK trades at $11.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas CLSK's P/E ratio is -10.57. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CLSK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to CLSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check CLSK's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BRZE has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while BRZE trades at $29.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas BRZE's P/E ratio is -29.33. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BRZE's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to BRZE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check BRZE's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while GBTG trades at $6.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is -66.75. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GBTG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check GBTG's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BLKB has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while BLKB trades at $64.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas BLKB's P/E ratio is -11.52. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BLKB's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to BLKB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check BLKB's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while DAVE trades at $220.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 61.18. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check DAVE's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ALIT has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while ALIT trades at $5.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas ALIT's P/E ratio is -92.25. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ALIT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to ALIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check ALIT's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, DAVEW has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while DAVEW trades at $1.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas DAVEW's P/E ratio is -7.28. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to DAVEW's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to DAVEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check DAVEW's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ALRM has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while ALRM trades at $55.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas ALRM's P/E ratio is 23.52. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ALRM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to ALRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check ALRM's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ALKT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while ALKT trades at $26.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas ALKT's P/E ratio is -71.95. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ALKT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to ALKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check ALKT's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, YOU has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while YOU trades at $29.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas YOU's P/E ratio is 18.28. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to YOU's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to YOU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check YOU's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BTDR has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while BTDR trades at $13.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas BTDR's P/E ratio is -2.83. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BTDR's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to BTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check BTDR's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PAR has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while PAR trades at $64.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas PAR's P/E ratio is -25.21. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PAR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to PAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check PAR's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 4.1B. In comparison, DCT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $13.91, while DCT trades at $18.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of -57.96, whereas DCT's P/E ratio is -172.64. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is -0.07%, compared to DCT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to DCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check DCT's competition here