Freshworks Inc.

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 234.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while SAP trades at $204.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 27.39. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check SAP's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 185.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while CRM trades at $199.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 26.04. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check CRM's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 157.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while SHOP trades at $125.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 128.44. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check SHOP's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 156.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while UBER trades at $74.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 15.91. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check UBER's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 147.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while APP trades at $444.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 43.36. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check APP's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 113.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while INTU trades at $394.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 28.11. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check INTU's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 113B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while NOW trades at $109.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 64.69. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check NOW's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 82B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while CDNS trades at $297.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 74.61. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check CDNS's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 57.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while SNOW trades at $173.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is -41.97. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check SNOW's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 52.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while ADSK trades at $233.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 47.65. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check ADSK's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 39.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while DDOG trades at $116.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 361.16. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check DDOG's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 36B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while MSTR trades at $133.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check MSTR's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 35.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while WDAY trades at $139.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 56.68. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check WDAY's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 33.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while FICO trades at $1,388.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 52.12. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check FICO's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while ANSS trades at $374.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 55.53. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check ANSS's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, STRC has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while STRC trades at $100.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas STRC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to STRC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to STRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check STRC's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while STRF trades at $100.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check STRF's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, GTOP has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while GTOP trades at $38.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas GTOP's P/E ratio is 36.35. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GTOP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to GTOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check GTOP's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while ZM trades at $75.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check ZM's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while STRK trades at $80.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check STRK's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while TEAM trades at $79.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is -104.35. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check TEAM's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while PTC trades at $157.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 23.06. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check PTC's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while SSNC trades at $75.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 23.90. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check SSNC's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while GRAB trades at $4.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 70.33. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check GRAB's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while AZPN trades at $264.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AZPN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check AZPN's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while TYL trades at $353.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 49.27. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check TYL's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, FIG has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while FIG trades at $30.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas FIG's P/E ratio is -7.92. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FIG's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to FIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check FIG's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while HUBS trades at $268.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is 307.49. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HUBS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check HUBS's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while GWRE trades at $144.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 137.18. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check GWRE's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while BKI trades at $75.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check BKI's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, TTD has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while TTD trades at $23.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas TTD's P/E ratio is 27.06. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TTD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to TTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check TTD's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, BVC has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while BVC trades at $6.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas BVC's P/E ratio is -98.43. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BVC's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to BVC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check BVC's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while DAY trades at $69.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is -73.54. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check DAY's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while XM trades at $18.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check XM's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while CDAY trades at $69.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CDAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check CDAY's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while DT trades at $36.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 59.87. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check DT's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while BSY trades at $37.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 44.57. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check BSY's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, YMM has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while YMM trades at $9.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas YMM's P/E ratio is 17.06. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to YMM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to YMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check YMM's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while IDCC trades at $375.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 31.09. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check IDCC's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while DOCU trades at $45.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 31.52. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check DOCU's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, OCFT has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while OCFT trades at $7.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas OCFT's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OCFT's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to OCFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check OCFT's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while PCOR trades at $55.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is -82.16. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check PCOR's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while MANH trades at $139.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 37.10. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check MANH's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while NATI trades at $59.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check NATI's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while SMAR trades at $56.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check SMAR's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, U has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while U trades at $19.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas U's P/E ratio is -18.97. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to U's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check U's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, MTCH has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while MTCH trades at $32.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas MTCH's P/E ratio is 13.28. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MTCH's ROE of -2.75%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to MTCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check MTCH's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while PEGA trades at $45.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check PEGA's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while NICE trades at $115.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 13.21. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check NICE's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while PAYC trades at $129.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 15.57. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check PAYC's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while CWAN trades at $23.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is -167.14. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CWAN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check CWAN's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while TTAN trades at $73.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is -9.29. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check TTAN's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while APPF trades at $176.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 45.81. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check APPF's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, OS has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while OS trades at $23.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas OS's P/E ratio is -49.15. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to OS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check OS's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while OTEX trades at $25.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 14.49. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check OTEX's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while COUP trades at $80.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check COUP's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while PCTY trades at $112.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 25.06. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check PCTY's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while DSGX trades at $67.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 37.22. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check DSGX's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while LYFT trades at $14.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 2.03. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check LYFT's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while ESTC trades at $61.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is -51.03. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ESTC's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check ESTC's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while SRAD trades at $18.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 53.71. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check SRAD's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while COMP trades at $10.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is -88.64. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to COMP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check COMP's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while FROG trades at $41.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is -64.76. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check FROG's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, YOU has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while YOU trades at $47.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas YOU's P/E ratio is 29.34. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to YOU's ROE of +1.73%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to YOU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check YOU's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while DUOL trades at $117.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 12.72. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check DUOL's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while BILL trades at $43.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is -193.46. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BILL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check BILL's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while GTLB trades at $27.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is -93.93. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GTLB's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check GTLB's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while CVT trades at $8.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check CVT's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while ZETA trades at $18.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is -211.88. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check ZETA's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while LIF trades at $52.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 142.30. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check LIF's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while PYCR trades at $22.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check PYCR's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while PWSC trades at $22.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check PWSC's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while CVLT trades at $88.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 44.31. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check CVLT's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while MNDY trades at $75.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 32.43. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check MNDY's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, KC has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while KC trades at $12.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas KC's P/E ratio is -24.96. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KC's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to KC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check KC's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, SOUN has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while SOUN trades at $8.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas SOUN's P/E ratio is -9.56. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SOUN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to SOUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check SOUN's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while AYX trades at $48.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check AYX's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while ENV trades at $63.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check ENV's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while WK trades at $61.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas WK's P/E ratio is -74.22. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WK's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to WK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check WK's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while INST trades at $23.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check INST's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, CALX has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while CALX trades at $51.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas CALX's P/E ratio is 199.23. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CALX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to CALX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check CALX's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while ZI trades at $9.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 77.92. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check ZI's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, NATL has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while NATL trades at $41.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas NATL's P/E ratio is 25.36. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NATL's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to NATL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check NATL's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, RNG has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while RNG trades at $37.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas RNG's P/E ratio is 260.57. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RNG's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to RNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check RNG's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, STUB has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while STUB trades at $9.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas STUB's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to STUB's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to STUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check STUB's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while QTWO trades at $48.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is 60.16. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to QTWO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check QTWO's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while BULL trades at $6.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is -5.53. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BULL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check BULL's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, DBD has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while DBD trades at $83.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas DBD's P/E ratio is 31.46. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DBD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to DBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check DBD's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while GBTG trades at $5.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is 547.50. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GBTG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check GBTG's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, FSLY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while FSLY trades at $17.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas FSLY's P/E ratio is -23.04. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FSLY's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to FSLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check FSLY's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while DAVE trades at $192.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 19.06. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check DAVE's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, CLSK has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while CLSK trades at $10.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas CLSK's P/E ratio is -9.39. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CLSK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to CLSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check CLSK's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, DCT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while DCT trades at $18.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas DCT's P/E ratio is -172.64. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DCT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to DCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check DCT's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, IE has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while IE trades at $16.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas IE's P/E ratio is -41.80. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IE's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to IE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check IE's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, SPNS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while SPNS trades at $43.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas SPNS's P/E ratio is 37.78. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SPNS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to SPNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check SPNS's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ALRM has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while ALRM trades at $48.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas ALRM's P/E ratio is 20.28. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ALRM's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to ALRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check ALRM's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while RUM trades at $5.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -4.01. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RUM's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to RUM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check RUM's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, BLKB has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while BLKB trades at $48.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas BLKB's P/E ratio is 20.48. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BLKB's ROE of +1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is more volatile compared to BLKB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check BLKB's competition here

FRSH plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FRSH stands at 2.3B. In comparison, VERX has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRSH is priced at $7.96, while VERX trades at $14.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FRSH currently has a P/E ratio of 12.41, whereas VERX's P/E ratio is 362.00. In terms of profitability, FRSH's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VERX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRSH is less volatile compared to VERX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRSH.Check VERX's competition here