Shift4 Payments, Inc.
Shift4 Payments, Inc. FOUR Peers
See (FOUR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FOUR | $98.26 | -0.86% | 8.7B | 33.48 | $2.92 | N/A |
| MSFT | $489.88 | -1.51% | 3.7T | 38.03 | $12.94 | +0.66% |
| ORCL | $224.56 | +2.71% | 615.2B | 50.35 | $4.35 | +0.78% |
| PLTR | $132.73 | -2.63% | 295.7B | 568.17 | $0.23 | N/A |
| ADBE | $377.19 | -2.50% | 167.1B | 25.13 | $15.60 | N/A |
| PANW | $196.05 | -4.20% | 131.7B | 113.55 | $1.74 | N/A |
| CRWD | $491.16 | -3.56% | 122.6B | -723.63 | -$0.68 | N/A |
| HOOD | $98.10 | +4.77% | 81.5B | 52.76 | $1.75 | N/A |
| SNPS | $520.84 | +1.59% | 81B | 60.32 | $8.65 | N/A |
| FTNT | $101.13 | -4.34% | 78.4B | 42.15 | $2.43 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FOUR vs MSFT Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, MSFT has a market cap of 3.7T. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while MSFT trades at $489.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas MSFT's P/E ratio is 38.03. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MSFT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to MSFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs ORCL Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, ORCL has a market cap of 615.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while ORCL trades at $224.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas ORCL's P/E ratio is 50.35. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ORCL's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to ORCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs PLTR Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, PLTR has a market cap of 295.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while PLTR trades at $132.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas PLTR's P/E ratio is 568.17. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PLTR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to PLTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs ADBE Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 167.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while ADBE trades at $377.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 25.13. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs PANW Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, PANW has a market cap of 131.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while PANW trades at $196.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas PANW's P/E ratio is 113.55. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PANW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to PANW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs CRWD Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, CRWD has a market cap of 122.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while CRWD trades at $491.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas CRWD's P/E ratio is -723.63. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CRWD's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to CRWD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs HOOD Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, HOOD has a market cap of 81.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while HOOD trades at $98.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas HOOD's P/E ratio is 52.76. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HOOD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to HOOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs SNPS Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, SNPS has a market cap of 81B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while SNPS trades at $520.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas SNPS's P/E ratio is 60.32. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SNPS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to SNPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs FTNT Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, FTNT has a market cap of 78.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while FTNT trades at $101.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas FTNT's P/E ratio is 42.15. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to FTNT's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to FTNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs CRWV Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, CRWV has a market cap of 74.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while CRWV trades at $151.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas CRWV's P/E ratio is -61.64. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CRWV's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to CRWV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs NET Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, NET has a market cap of 64.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while NET trades at $183.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas NET's P/E ratio is -804.18. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NET's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to NET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs VMW Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, VMW has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while VMW trades at $142.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas VMW's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to VMW's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to VMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs SQ Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, SQ has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while SQ trades at $83.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas SQ's P/E ratio is 49.98. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SQ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to SQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs ZS Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, ZS has a market cap of 47.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while ZS trades at $308.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas ZS's P/E ratio is -1138.22. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ZS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to ZS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs XYZ Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, XYZ has a market cap of 42B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while XYZ trades at $69.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas XYZ's P/E ratio is 16.57. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to XYZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to XYZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs NETE Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, NETE has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while NETE trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas NETE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NETE's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to NETE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs VRSN Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, VRSN has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while VRSN trades at $280.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas VRSN's P/E ratio is 35.34. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to VRSN's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to VRSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs SPLK Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, SPLK has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while SPLK trades at $156.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas SPLK's P/E ratio is 103.22. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SPLK's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to SPLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs GDDY Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, GDDY has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while GDDY trades at $175.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas GDDY's P/E ratio is 34.38. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GDDY's ROE of +2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to GDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs TOST Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, TOST has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while TOST trades at $42.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas TOST's P/E ratio is 159.43. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TOST's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to TOST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs CHKP Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, CHKP has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while CHKP trades at $219.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas CHKP's P/E ratio is 29.20. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CHKP's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to CHKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs CPAY Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, CPAY has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while CPAY trades at $336.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas CPAY's P/E ratio is 23.76. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CPAY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to CPAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs IOT Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, IOT has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while IOT trades at $37.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas IOT's P/E ratio is -178.02. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to IOT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to IOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs FLT Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, FLT has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while FLT trades at $303.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas FLT's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to FLT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to FLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs AFRM Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, AFRM has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while AFRM trades at $68.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas AFRM's P/E ratio is -353.16. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AFRM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to AFRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs NTNX Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, NTNX has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while NTNX trades at $74.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas NTNX's P/E ratio is -289.19. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NTNX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to NTNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs CYBR Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, CYBR has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while CYBR trades at $385.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas CYBR's P/E ratio is -192.97. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CYBR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to CYBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs GEN Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, GEN has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while GEN trades at $29.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas GEN's P/E ratio is 28.93. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GEN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to GEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs FFIV Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, FFIV has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while FFIV trades at $294.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas FFIV's P/E ratio is 28.08. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to FFIV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to FFIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs MDB Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, MDB has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while MDB trades at $204.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas MDB's P/E ratio is -187.31. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MDB's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to MDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs RBRK Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, RBRK has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while RBRK trades at $84.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas RBRK's P/E ratio is 24.55. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to RBRK's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to RBRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs OKTA Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, OKTA has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while OKTA trades at $97.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas OKTA's P/E ratio is 151.62. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to OKTA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to OKTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs KSPI Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, KSPI has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while KSPI trades at $84.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas KSPI's P/E ratio is 7.87. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to KSPI's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to KSPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs NLOK Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, NLOK has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while NLOK trades at $21.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas NLOK's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NLOK's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to NLOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs SAIL Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, SAIL has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while SAIL trades at $21.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas SAIL's P/E ratio is -13.32. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SAIL's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to SAIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs AKAM Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, AKAM has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while AKAM trades at $79.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas AKAM's P/E ratio is 26.71. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AKAM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to AKAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs DOX Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, DOX has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while DOX trades at $91.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas DOX's P/E ratio is 19.37. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DOX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to DOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs ALTR Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, ALTR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while ALTR trades at $111.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas ALTR's P/E ratio is 699.06. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ALTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to ALTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs PLAN Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, PLAN has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while PLAN trades at $63.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas PLAN's P/E ratio is -44.82. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PLAN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to PLAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs KVYO Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, KVYO has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while KVYO trades at $32.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas KVYO's P/E ratio is -195.59. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to KVYO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to KVYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs WIX Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, WIX has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while WIX trades at $164.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas WIX's P/E ratio is 63.90. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WIX's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to WIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs CFLT Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, CFLT has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while CFLT trades at $25.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas CFLT's P/E ratio is -25.72. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CFLT's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to CFLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs INFA Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, INFA has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while INFA trades at $24.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas INFA's P/E ratio is 810.33. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to INFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to INFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs DBX Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, DBX has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while DBX trades at $27.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas DBX's P/E ratio is 18.22. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DBX's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to DBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs HCP Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, HCP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while HCP trades at $34.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas HCP's P/E ratio is -57.97. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HCP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to HCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs PATH Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, PATH has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while PATH trades at $12.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas PATH's P/E ratio is -105.79. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PATH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to PATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs JCOM Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, JCOM has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while JCOM trades at $142.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas JCOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to JCOM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to JCOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs SQSP Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, SQSP has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while SQSP trades at $46.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas SQSP's P/E ratio is -1164.25. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SQSP's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to SQSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs CCCS Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, CCCS has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while CCCS trades at $9.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas CCCS's P/E ratio is 940.00. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CCCS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to CCCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs NEWR Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, NEWR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while NEWR trades at $86.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas NEWR's P/E ratio is -41.62. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NEWR's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to NEWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs S Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, S has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while S trades at $17.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas S's P/E ratio is -13.77. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to S's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to S. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs VRNS Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, VRNS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while VRNS trades at $49.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas VRNS's P/E ratio is -61.77. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to VRNS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to VRNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs SPSC Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, SPSC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while SPSC trades at $139.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas SPSC's P/E ratio is 64.59. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SPSC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to SPSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs QLYS Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, QLYS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while QLYS trades at $143.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas QLYS's P/E ratio is 29.54. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to QLYS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to QLYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs WEX Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, WEX has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while WEX trades at $151.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas WEX's P/E ratio is 19.41. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WEX's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to WEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs CORZ Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, CORZ has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while CORZ trades at $17.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas CORZ's P/E ratio is -4.40. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CORZ's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to CORZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs CORZZ Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, CORZZ has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while CORZZ trades at $17.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas CORZZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CORZZ's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to CORZZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs BOX Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while BOX trades at $32.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 25.92. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BOX's ROE of +1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to BOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs NVEI Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, NVEI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while NVEI trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas NVEI's P/E ratio is 212.44. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NVEI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to NVEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs ACIW Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, ACIW has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while ACIW trades at $45.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas ACIW's P/E ratio is 18.16. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ACIW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to ACIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs EEFT Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, EEFT has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while EEFT trades at $104.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas EEFT's P/E ratio is 15.41. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to EEFT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to EEFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs STNE Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, STNE has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while STNE trades at $15.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas STNE's P/E ratio is -20.17. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to STNE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to STNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs ODD Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, ODD has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while ODD trades at $75.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas ODD's P/E ratio is 42.67. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ODD's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to ODD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs TENB Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, TENB has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while TENB trades at $33.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas TENB's P/E ratio is -88.37. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TENB's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to TENB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs ESMT Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, ESMT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while ESMT trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas ESMT's P/E ratio is 153.67. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ESMT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to ESMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs CLBT Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, CLBT has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while CLBT trades at $15.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas CLBT's P/E ratio is -17.18. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CLBT's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to CLBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs AVPT Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, AVPT has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while AVPT trades at $18.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas AVPT's P/E ratio is -143.00. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AVPT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to AVPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs RELY Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, RELY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while RELY trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas RELY's P/E ratio is -615.33. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to RELY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to RELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs SWI Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, SWI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while SWI trades at $18.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas SWI's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SWI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to SWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs DLO Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, DLO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while DLO trades at $11.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas DLO's P/E ratio is 23.31. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DLO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to DLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs CORZW Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, CORZW has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while CORZW trades at $10.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas CORZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CORZW's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to CORZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs PAGS Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, PAGS has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while PAGS trades at $9.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas PAGS's P/E ratio is 7.69. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PAGS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to PAGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs EVOP Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, EVOP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while EVOP trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas EVOP's P/E ratio is -309.00. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to EVOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to EVOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs MQ Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, MQ has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while MQ trades at $5.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas MQ's P/E ratio is 58.10. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MQ's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to MQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs BB Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, BB has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while BB trades at $4.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas BB's P/E ratio is 216.75. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BB's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to BB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs DOCN Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, DOCN has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while DOCN trades at $28.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas DOCN's P/E ratio is 24.78. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DOCN's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to DOCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs PAYO Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, PAYO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while PAYO trades at $6.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas PAYO's P/E ratio is 24.61. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PAYO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to PAYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs EVTC Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, EVTC has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while EVTC trades at $37.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas EVTC's P/E ratio is 18.51. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to EVTC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to EVTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs APPN Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, APPN has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while APPN trades at $30.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas APPN's P/E ratio is -36.70. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to APPN's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to APPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs TDC Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, TDC has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while TDC trades at $23.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas TDC's P/E ratio is 16.41. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TDC's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to TDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs WRD Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, WRD has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while WRD trades at $7.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas WRD's P/E ratio is -6.42. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WRD's ROE of +1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to WRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs RAMP Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, RAMP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while RAMP trades at $32.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas RAMP's P/E ratio is -828.75. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to RAMP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to RAMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs GETVV Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, GETVV has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while GETVV trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas GETVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GETVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to GETVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs FIVN Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, FIVN has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while FIVN trades at $26.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas FIVN's P/E ratio is -443.50. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to FIVN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to FIVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs AVDX Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, AVDX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while AVDX trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas AVDX's P/E ratio is 245.50. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AVDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to AVDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs FORG Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, FORG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while FORG trades at $23.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas FORG's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to FORG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to FORG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs EVCM Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, EVCM has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while EVCM trades at $10.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas EVCM's P/E ratio is -87.92. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to EVCM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to EVCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs CSGS Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, CSGS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while CSGS trades at $65.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas CSGS's P/E ratio is 22.59. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CSGS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to CSGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs GSKY Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, GSKY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while GSKY trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas GSKY's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GSKY's ROE of +5.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to GSKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs NTCT Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, NTCT has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while NTCT trades at $24.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas NTCT's P/E ratio is -4.85. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NTCT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to NTCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs GET Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, GET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while GET trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas GET's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to GET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs PGY Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, PGY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while PGY trades at $22.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas PGY's P/E ratio is -4.32. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PGY's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to PGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs STER Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, STER has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while STER trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas STER's P/E ratio is -98.47. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to STER's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to STER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs PGYWW Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, PGYWW has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while PGYWW trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas PGYWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PGYWW's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to PGYWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs RPD Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, RPD has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while RPD trades at $23.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas RPD's P/E ratio is 58.63. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to RPD's ROE of +9.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to RPD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs ZUO Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, ZUO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while ZUO trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas ZUO's P/E ratio is -19.65. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ZUO's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to ZUO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs SUMO Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, SUMO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while SUMO trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas SUMO's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SUMO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to SUMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs GB Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, GB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while GB trades at $7.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas GB's P/E ratio is 18.67. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GB's ROE of +0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to GB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.
FOUR vs AVPTW Comparison
FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 8.7B. In comparison, AVPTW has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $98.26, while AVPTW trades at $6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 33.48, whereas AVPTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AVPTW's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to AVPTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.