Shift4 Payments, Inc.

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, MSFT has a market cap of 2.9T. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while MSFT trades at $398.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas MSFT's P/E ratio is 24.86. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MSFT's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to MSFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check MSFT's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, ORCL has a market cap of 425.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while ORCL trades at $156.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas ORCL's P/E ratio is 27.79. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ORCL's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to ORCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check ORCL's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, PLTR has a market cap of 308.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while PLTR trades at $134.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas PLTR's P/E ratio is 211.31. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PLTR's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to PLTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check PLTR's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 108.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while ADBE trades at $259.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 15.49. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check ADBE's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, PANW has a market cap of 103.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while PANW trades at $150.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas PANW's P/E ratio is 94.71. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PANW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to PANW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check PANW's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, CRWD has a market cap of 98B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while CRWD trades at $422.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas CRWD's P/E ratio is -301.24. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CRWD's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to CRWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check CRWD's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, SNPS has a market cap of 84.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while SNPS trades at $442.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas SNPS's P/E ratio is 54.61. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SNPS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to SNPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check SNPS's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, NET has a market cap of 62.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while NET trades at $192.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas NET's P/E ratio is -611.08. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NET's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to NET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check NET's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, VMW has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while VMW trades at $142.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas VMW's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VMW's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to VMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check VMW's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, FTNT has a market cap of 61.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while FTNT trades at $81.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas FTNT's P/E ratio is 33.06. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FTNT's ROE of +1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to FTNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check FTNT's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, SQ has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while SQ trades at $83.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas SQ's P/E ratio is 49.98. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SQ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to SQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check SQ's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, CRWV has a market cap of 44.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while CRWV trades at $97.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas CRWV's P/E ratio is -53.77. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CRWV's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to CRWV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check CRWV's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, XYZ has a market cap of 32.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while XYZ trades at $52.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas XYZ's P/E ratio is 10.71. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XYZ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to XYZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check XYZ's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, MDB has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while MDB trades at $355.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas MDB's P/E ratio is -420.20. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MDB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to MDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check MDB's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, NETE has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while NETE trades at $13.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas NETE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NETE's ROE of +3.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to NETE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check NETE's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, SPLK has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while SPLK trades at $156.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas SPLK's P/E ratio is 103.22. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SPLK's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to SPLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check SPLK's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, ZS has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while ZS trades at $168.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas ZS's P/E ratio is -639.00. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ZS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to ZS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check ZS's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, CPAY has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while CPAY trades at $347.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas CPAY's P/E ratio is 23.48. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CPAY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to CPAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check CPAY's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, FLT has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while FLT trades at $303.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas FLT's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FLT's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to FLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check FLT's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, CYBR has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while CYBR trades at $408.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas CYBR's P/E ratio is -139.06. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CYBR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to CYBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check CYBR's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, VRSN has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while VRSN trades at $216.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas VRSN's P/E ratio is 24.54. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VRSN's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to VRSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check VRSN's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, CHKP has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while CHKP trades at $159.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas CHKP's P/E ratio is 16.53. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CHKP's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to CHKP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check CHKP's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, AFRM has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while AFRM trades at $51.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas AFRM's P/E ratio is 63.05. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AFRM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to AFRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check AFRM's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, TOST has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while TOST trades at $27.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas TOST's P/E ratio is 48.32. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TOST's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to TOST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check TOST's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, FFIV has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while FFIV trades at $279.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas FFIV's P/E ratio is 23.03. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FFIV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to FFIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check FFIV's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, IOT has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while IOT trades at $26.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas IOT's P/E ratio is -382.71. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IOT's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to IOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check IOT's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, NLOK has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while NLOK trades at $21.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas NLOK's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NLOK's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to NLOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check NLOK's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, KSPI has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while KSPI trades at $73.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas KSPI's P/E ratio is 6.34. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KSPI's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to KSPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check KSPI's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, GEN has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while GEN trades at $22.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas GEN's P/E ratio is 23.04. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GEN's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to GEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check GEN's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, AKAM has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while AKAM trades at $109.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas AKAM's P/E ratio is 27.67. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AKAM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to AKAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check AKAM's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, OKTA has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while OKTA trades at $81.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas OKTA's P/E ratio is 67.54. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OKTA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to OKTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check OKTA's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, GDDY has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while GDDY trades at $88.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas GDDY's P/E ratio is 15.62. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GDDY's ROE of +2.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to GDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check GDDY's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, CFLT has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while CFLT trades at $30.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas CFLT's P/E ratio is -35.70. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CFLT's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to CFLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check CFLT's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, NTNX has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while NTNX trades at $41.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas NTNX's P/E ratio is 52.42. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NTNX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to NTNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check NTNX's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, RBRK has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while RBRK trades at $54.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas RBRK's P/E ratio is -32.41. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RBRK's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to RBRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check RBRK's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, ALTR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while ALTR trades at $111.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas ALTR's P/E ratio is 699.06. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALTR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to ALTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check ALTR's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, PLAN has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while PLAN trades at $63.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas PLAN's P/E ratio is -44.82. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PLAN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to PLAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check PLAN's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, SAIL has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while SAIL trades at $15.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas SAIL's P/E ratio is -12.23. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SAIL's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to SAIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check SAIL's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, DOX has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while DOX trades at $69.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas DOX's P/E ratio is 13.57. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DOX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to DOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check DOX's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, INFA has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while INFA trades at $24.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas INFA's P/E ratio is 826.33. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to INFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to INFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check INFA's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, DBX has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while DBX trades at $24.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas DBX's P/E ratio is 14.48. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DBX's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to DBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check DBX's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, HCP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while HCP trades at $34.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas HCP's P/E ratio is -57.97. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HCP's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to HCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check HCP's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, JCOM has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while JCOM trades at $142.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas JCOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JCOM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to JCOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check JCOM's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, SQSP has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while SQSP trades at $46.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas SQSP's P/E ratio is -1164.25. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SQSP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to SQSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check SQSP's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, NEWR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while NEWR trades at $86.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas NEWR's P/E ratio is -41.62. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NEWR's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to NEWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check NEWR's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, DOCN has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while DOCN trades at $68.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas DOCN's P/E ratio is 25.46. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DOCN's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to DOCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check DOCN's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, PATH has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while PATH trades at $11.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas PATH's P/E ratio is 25.69. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PATH's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to PATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check PATH's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, CCCS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while CCCS trades at $8.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas CCCS's P/E ratio is -875.00. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CCCS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to CCCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check CCCS's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, WEX has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while WEX trades at $154.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas WEX's P/E ratio is 18.59. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WEX's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to WEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check WEX's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, CORZ has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while CORZ trades at $17.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas CORZ's P/E ratio is -7.69. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CORZ's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to CORZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check CORZ's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, CORZZ has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while CORZZ trades at $17.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas CORZZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CORZZ's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to CORZZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check CORZZ's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, KVYO has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while KVYO trades at $18.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas KVYO's P/E ratio is -157.41. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KVYO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to KVYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check KVYO's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, KLAR has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while KLAR trades at $13.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas KLAR's P/E ratio is -43.60. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KLAR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to KLAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check KLAR's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, NVEI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while NVEI trades at $33.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas NVEI's P/E ratio is 212.44. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NVEI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to NVEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check NVEI's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, BLSH has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while BLSH trades at $32.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas BLSH's P/E ratio is -5.17. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BLSH's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to BLSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check BLSH's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, STNE has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while STNE trades at $16.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas STNE's P/E ratio is -28.60. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to STNE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to STNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check STNE's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, S has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while S trades at $13.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas S's P/E ratio is -10.31. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to S's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to S. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check S's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, ACIW has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while ACIW trades at $40.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas ACIW's P/E ratio is 16.55. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ACIW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to ACIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check ACIW's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, ESMT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while ESMT trades at $23.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas ESMT's P/E ratio is 153.67. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ESMT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to ESMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check ESMT's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, DLO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while DLO trades at $12.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas DLO's P/E ratio is 23.91. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DLO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to DLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check DLO's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, WIX has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while WIX trades at $66.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas WIX's P/E ratio is 28.35. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WIX's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to WIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check WIX's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, RELY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while RELY trades at $17.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas RELY's P/E ratio is 190.56. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RELY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to RELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check RELY's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, PAGS has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while PAGS trades at $11.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas PAGS's P/E ratio is 8.07. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PAGS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to PAGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check PAGS's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, CORZW has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while CORZW trades at $11.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas CORZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CORZW's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to CORZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check CORZW's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, QLYS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while QLYS trades at $103.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas QLYS's P/E ratio is 17.03. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to QLYS's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to QLYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check QLYS's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while BOX trades at $22.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 18.30. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BOX's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to BOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check BOX's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, CCC has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while CCC trades at $5.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas CCC's P/E ratio is -509.00. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CCC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to CCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check CCC's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, CLBT has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while CLBT trades at $13.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas CLBT's P/E ratio is 42.45. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CLBT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to CLBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check CLBT's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, SWI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while SWI trades at $18.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas SWI's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SWI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to SWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check SWI's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, EEFT has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while EEFT trades at $71.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas EEFT's P/E ratio is 10.60. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EEFT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to EEFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check EEFT's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, EVOP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while EVOP trades at $33.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas EVOP's P/E ratio is -309.00. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EVOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to EVOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check EVOP's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, TDC has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while TDC trades at $32.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas TDC's P/E ratio is 22.90. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TDC's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to TDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check TDC's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, VRNS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while VRNS trades at $25.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas VRNS's P/E ratio is -20.96. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VRNS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to VRNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check VRNS's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, TENB has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while TENB trades at $21.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas TENB's P/E ratio is -66.37. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TENB's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to TENB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check TENB's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, CSGS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while CSGS trades at $79.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas CSGS's P/E ratio is 40.37. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CSGS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to CSGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check CSGS's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, AVPT has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while AVPT trades at $10.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas AVPT's P/E ratio is -1050.00. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AVPT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to AVPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check AVPT's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, SPSC has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while SPSC trades at $58.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas SPSC's P/E ratio is 23.56. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SPSC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to SPSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check SPSC's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, NTCT has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while NTCT trades at $29.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas NTCT's P/E ratio is 22.33. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NTCT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to NTCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check NTCT's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, AVDX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while AVDX trades at $10.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas AVDX's P/E ratio is -250.00. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AVDX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to AVDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check AVDX's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, GETVV has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while GETVV trades at $2.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas GETVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GETVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to GETVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check GETVV's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, WRD has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while WRD trades at $7.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas WRD's P/E ratio is -9.09. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WRD's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to WRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check WRD's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, BB has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while BB trades at $3.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas BB's P/E ratio is 85.88. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to BB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check BB's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, PICS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while PICS trades at $15.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas PICS's P/E ratio is 31.00. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PICS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to PICS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check PICS's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, FORG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while FORG trades at $23.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas FORG's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FORG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to FORG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check FORG's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, PAYO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while PAYO trades at $5.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas PAYO's P/E ratio is 30.06. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PAYO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to PAYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check PAYO's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, MQ has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while MQ trades at $4.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas MQ's P/E ratio is -47.11. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MQ's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to MQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check MQ's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, GSKY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while GSKY trades at $10.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas GSKY's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GSKY's ROE of +5.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to GSKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check GSKY's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, EVCM has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while EVCM trades at $9.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas EVCM's P/E ratio is -129.00. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EVCM's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to EVCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check EVCM's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, APPN has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while APPN trades at $24.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas APPN's P/E ratio is -251.80. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to APPN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to APPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check APPN's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, ODD has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while ODD trades at $30.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas ODD's P/E ratio is 17.58. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ODD's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to ODD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check ODD's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, EVTC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while EVTC trades at $27.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas EVTC's P/E ratio is 12.19. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EVTC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to EVTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check EVTC's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, GET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while GET trades at $1.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas GET's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to GET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check GET's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, STER has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while STER trades at $16.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas STER's P/E ratio is -98.47. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to STER's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to STER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check STER's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, RAMP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while RAMP trades at $25.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas RAMP's P/E ratio is 24.64. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RAMP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to RAMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check RAMP's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, ZUO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while ZUO trades at $10.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas ZUO's P/E ratio is -19.65. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ZUO's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to ZUO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check ZUO's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, FIVN has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while FIVN trades at $17.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas FIVN's P/E ratio is 50.84. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FIVN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is less volatile compared to FIVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check FIVN's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, SUMO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while SUMO trades at $12.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas SUMO's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SUMO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to SUMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check SUMO's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, GB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while GB trades at $7.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas GB's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GB's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to GB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check GB's competition here

FOUR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOUR stands at 5.2B. In comparison, ATEN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FOUR is priced at $58.49, while ATEN trades at $19.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOUR currently has a P/E ratio of 27.34, whereas ATEN's P/E ratio is 35.05. In terms of profitability, FOUR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ATEN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FOUR is more volatile compared to ATEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOUR.Check ATEN's competition here