FLEETCOR Technologies, Inc.
FLEETCOR Technologies, Inc. FLT Peers
See (FLT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLT | $303.26 | -0.83% | 21.79B | 22.97 | $13.20 | N/A |
| MSFT | $450.18 | -1.03% | 3.35T | 34.79 | $12.94 | +0.72% |
| ORCL | $156.00 | -0.83% | 437.46B | 36.62 | $4.26 | +1.08% |
| PLTR | $123.33 | +0.85% | 291.05B | 536.22 | $0.23 | N/A |
| ADBE | $407.69 | -1.60% | 173.76B | 26.91 | $15.15 | N/A |
| PANW | $186.75 | +0.33% | 123.65B | 107.33 | $1.74 | N/A |
| CRWD | $455.23 | +2.51% | 113.39B | -5058.11 | -$0.09 | N/A |
| FTNT | $103.15 | -0.45% | 78.95B | 42.45 | $2.43 | N/A |
| SNPS | $498.85 | -0.92% | 77.13B | 60.10 | $8.30 | N/A |
| VMW | $142.48 | -4.96% | 61.52B | 42.92 | $3.32 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FLT vs MSFT Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, MSFT has a market cap of 3.35T. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while MSFT trades at $450.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas MSFT's P/E ratio is 34.79. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to MSFT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is more volatile compared to MSFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs ORCL Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, ORCL has a market cap of 437.46B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while ORCL trades at $156.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas ORCL's P/E ratio is 36.62. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ORCL's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to ORCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs PLTR Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, PLTR has a market cap of 291.05B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while PLTR trades at $123.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas PLTR's P/E ratio is 536.22. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to PLTR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to PLTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs ADBE Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 173.76B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while ADBE trades at $407.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 26.91. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is more volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs PANW Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, PANW has a market cap of 123.65B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while PANW trades at $186.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas PANW's P/E ratio is 107.33. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to PANW's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to PANW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs CRWD Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, CRWD has a market cap of 113.39B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while CRWD trades at $455.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas CRWD's P/E ratio is -5058.11. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CRWD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to CRWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs FTNT Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, FTNT has a market cap of 78.95B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while FTNT trades at $103.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas FTNT's P/E ratio is 42.45. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to FTNT's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to FTNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs SNPS Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, SNPS has a market cap of 77.13B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while SNPS trades at $498.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas SNPS's P/E ratio is 60.10. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SNPS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to SNPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs VMW Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, VMW has a market cap of 61.52B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while VMW trades at $142.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas VMW's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to VMW's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is more volatile compared to VMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs HOOD Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, HOOD has a market cap of 55.75B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while HOOD trades at $63.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas HOOD's P/E ratio is 36.10. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to HOOD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to HOOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs NET Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, NET has a market cap of 54.83B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while NET trades at $158.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas NET's P/E ratio is -687.74. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to NET's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to NET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs SQ Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, SQ has a market cap of 51.73B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while SQ trades at $83.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas SQ's P/E ratio is 49.98. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SQ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to SQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs CRWV Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, CRWV has a market cap of 49.31B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while CRWV trades at $102.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas CRWV's P/E ratio is -40.61. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CRWV's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to CRWV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs ZS Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, ZS has a market cap of 39.32B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while ZS trades at $254.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas ZS's P/E ratio is -2541.00. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ZS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to ZS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs XYZ Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, XYZ has a market cap of 36.18B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while XYZ trades at $58.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas XYZ's P/E ratio is 14.26. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to XYZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to XYZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs NETE Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, NETE has a market cap of 27.82B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while NETE trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas NETE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to NETE's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to NETE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs SPLK Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, SPLK has a market cap of 26.44B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while SPLK trades at $156.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas SPLK's P/E ratio is 103.22. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SPLK's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is more volatile compared to SPLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs VRSN Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, VRSN has a market cap of 26.27B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while VRSN trades at $279.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas VRSN's P/E ratio is 34.20. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to VRSN's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is more volatile compared to VRSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs GDDY Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, GDDY has a market cap of 26.05B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while GDDY trades at $182.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas GDDY's P/E ratio is 35.22. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to GDDY's ROE of +2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to GDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs IOT Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, IOT has a market cap of 25.90B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while IOT trades at $45.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas IOT's P/E ratio is -162.50. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to IOT's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to IOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs CHKP Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, CHKP has a market cap of 24.69B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while CHKP trades at $227.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas CHKP's P/E ratio is 30.06. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CHKP's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to CHKP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs TOST Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, TOST has a market cap of 24.59B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while TOST trades at $42.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas TOST's P/E ratio is 157.41. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to TOST's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to TOST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs CPAY Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, CPAY has a market cap of 22.85B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while CPAY trades at $324.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas CPAY's P/E ratio is 22.77. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CPAY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to CPAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs NTNX Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, NTNX has a market cap of 21.27B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while NTNX trades at $79.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas NTNX's P/E ratio is -306.77. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to NTNX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to NTNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs OKTA Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, OKTA has a market cap of 20.68B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while OKTA trades at $123.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas OKTA's P/E ratio is 2062.00. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to OKTA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to OKTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs CYBR Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, CYBR has a market cap of 18.86B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while CYBR trades at $381.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas CYBR's P/E ratio is -188.76. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CYBR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to CYBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs RBRK Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, RBRK has a market cap of 17.85B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while RBRK trades at $92.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas RBRK's P/E ratio is -12.34. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to RBRK's ROE of +2.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to RBRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs GEN Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, GEN has a market cap of 17.11B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while GEN trades at $27.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas GEN's P/E ratio is 26.79. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to GEN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to GEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs FFIV Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, FFIV has a market cap of 16.20B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while FFIV trades at $282.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas FFIV's P/E ratio is 26.79. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to FFIV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to FFIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs AFRM Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, AFRM has a market cap of 15.90B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while AFRM trades at $49.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas AFRM's P/E ratio is -259.47. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to AFRM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to AFRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs KSPI Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, KSPI has a market cap of 15.33B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while KSPI trades at $80.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas KSPI's P/E ratio is 7.42. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to KSPI's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to KSPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs MDB Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, MDB has a market cap of 15.18B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while MDB trades at $185.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas MDB's P/E ratio is -106.78. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to MDB's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to MDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs NLOK Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, NLOK has a market cap of 14.32B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while NLOK trades at $21.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas NLOK's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to NLOK's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to NLOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs AKAM Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, AKAM has a market cap of 11.09B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while AKAM trades at $75.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas AKAM's P/E ratio is 25.45. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to AKAM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to AKAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs DOX Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, DOX has a market cap of 10.16B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while DOX trades at $91.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas DOX's P/E ratio is 19.19. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to DOX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is more volatile compared to DOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs ALTR Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, ALTR has a market cap of 9.63B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while ALTR trades at $111.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas ALTR's P/E ratio is 699.06. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ALTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is more volatile compared to ALTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs PLAN Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, PLAN has a market cap of 9.59B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while PLAN trades at $63.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas PLAN's P/E ratio is -44.82. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to PLAN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is more volatile compared to PLAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs SAIL Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, SAIL has a market cap of 9.51B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while SAIL trades at $17.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas SAIL's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SAIL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to SAIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs KVYO Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, KVYO has a market cap of 9.25B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while KVYO trades at $33.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas KVYO's P/E ratio is -197.09. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to KVYO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to KVYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs WIX Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, WIX has a market cap of 8.42B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while WIX trades at $151.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas WIX's P/E ratio is 59.79. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to WIX's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to WIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs DBX Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, DBX has a market cap of 8.05B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while DBX trades at $28.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas DBX's P/E ratio is 18.82. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to DBX's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to DBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs INFA Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, INFA has a market cap of 7.81B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while INFA trades at $22.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas INFA's P/E ratio is 752.33. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to INFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to INFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs CFLT Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, CFLT has a market cap of 7.43B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while CFLT trades at $21.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas CFLT's P/E ratio is -22.52. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CFLT's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to CFLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs HCP Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, HCP has a market cap of 7.11B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while HCP trades at $34.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas HCP's P/E ratio is -57.97. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to HCP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is more volatile compared to HCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs JCOM Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, JCOM has a market cap of 6.75B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while JCOM trades at $142.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas JCOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to JCOM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to JCOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs PATH Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, PATH has a market cap of 6.62B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while PATH trades at $12.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas PATH's P/E ratio is -95.19. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to PATH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to PATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs SQSP Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, SQSP has a market cap of 6.47B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while SQSP trades at $46.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas SQSP's P/E ratio is -1164.25. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SQSP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is more volatile compared to SQSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs S Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, S has a market cap of 6.26B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while S trades at $19.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas S's P/E ratio is -21.47. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to S's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to S. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs NEWR Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, NEWR has a market cap of 6.18B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while NEWR trades at $86.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas NEWR's P/E ratio is -41.62. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to NEWR's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is more volatile compared to NEWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs FOUR Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, FOUR has a market cap of 6.02B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while FOUR trades at $89.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas FOUR's P/E ratio is 30.53. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to FOUR's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to FOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs CCCS Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, CCCS has a market cap of 5.58B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while CCCS trades at $8.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas CCCS's P/E ratio is 847.00. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CCCS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to CCCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs SPSC Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, SPSC has a market cap of 5.43B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while SPSC trades at $142.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas SPSC's P/E ratio is 66.46. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SPSC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to SPSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs VRNS Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, VRNS has a market cap of 5.24B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while VRNS trades at $46.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas VRNS's P/E ratio is -57.80. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to VRNS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to VRNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs QLYS Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, QLYS has a market cap of 4.89B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while QLYS trades at $134.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas QLYS's P/E ratio is 27.51. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to QLYS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is more volatile compared to QLYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs ACIW Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, ACIW has a market cap of 4.86B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while ACIW trades at $46.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas ACIW's P/E ratio is 18.30. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ACIW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to ACIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs NVEI Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, NVEI has a market cap of 4.84B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while NVEI trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas NVEI's P/E ratio is 212.44. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to NVEI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is more volatile compared to NVEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs WEX Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, WEX has a market cap of 4.57B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while WEX trades at $133.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas WEX's P/E ratio is 17.22. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to WEX's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to WEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs RELY Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, RELY has a market cap of 4.55B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while RELY trades at $22.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas RELY's P/E ratio is -744.33. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to RELY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to RELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs EEFT Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, EEFT has a market cap of 4.55B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while EEFT trades at $105.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas EEFT's P/E ratio is 15.58. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to EEFT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to EEFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs BOX Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 4.50B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while BOX trades at $31.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 22.86. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to BOX's ROE of +2.72%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is more volatile compared to BOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs CLBT Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, CLBT has a market cap of 4.12B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while CLBT trades at $17.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas CLBT's P/E ratio is -18.71. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CLBT's ROE of -1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to CLBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs TENB Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, TENB has a market cap of 3.90B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while TENB trades at $31.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas TENB's P/E ratio is -83.95. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to TENB's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to TENB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs ODD Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, ODD has a market cap of 3.89B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while ODD trades at $69.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas ODD's P/E ratio is 40.03. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ODD's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to ODD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs ESMT Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, ESMT has a market cap of 3.88B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while ESMT trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas ESMT's P/E ratio is 153.67. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ESMT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is more volatile compared to ESMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs AVPT Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, AVPT has a market cap of 3.70B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while AVPT trades at $18.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas AVPT's P/E ratio is -140.23. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to AVPT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to AVPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs STNE Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, STNE has a market cap of 3.60B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while STNE trades at $13.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas STNE's P/E ratio is -17.02. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to STNE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to STNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs DLO Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, DLO has a market cap of 3.21B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while DLO trades at $11.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas DLO's P/E ratio is 23.46. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to DLO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to DLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs SWI Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, SWI has a market cap of 3.20B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while SWI trades at $18.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas SWI's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SWI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is more volatile compared to SWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs CORZ Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, CORZ has a market cap of 3.18B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while CORZ trades at $10.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas CORZ's P/E ratio is -2.72. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CORZ's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to CORZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs CORZZ Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, CORZZ has a market cap of 3.17B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while CORZZ trades at $10.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas CORZZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CORZZ's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to CORZZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs EVOP Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, EVOP has a market cap of 3.00B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while EVOP trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas EVOP's P/E ratio is -309.00. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to EVOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is more volatile compared to EVOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs PAGS Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, PAGS has a market cap of 2.85B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while PAGS trades at $8.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas PAGS's P/E ratio is 7.15. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to PAGS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to PAGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs DOCN Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, DOCN has a market cap of 2.55B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while DOCN trades at $27.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas DOCN's P/E ratio is 24.76. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to DOCN's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to DOCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs PAYO Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, PAYO has a market cap of 2.46B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while PAYO trades at $6.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas PAYO's P/E ratio is 24.32. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to PAYO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to PAYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs MQ Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, MQ has a market cap of 2.37B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while MQ trades at $5.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas MQ's P/E ratio is 50.70. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to MQ's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to MQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs EVTC Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, EVTC has a market cap of 2.33B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while EVTC trades at $36.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas EVTC's P/E ratio is 18.26. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to EVTC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to EVTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs APPN Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, APPN has a market cap of 2.28B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while APPN trades at $30.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas APPN's P/E ratio is -37.00. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to APPN's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to APPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs BB Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, BB has a market cap of 2.25B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while BB trades at $3.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas BB's P/E ratio is -376.50. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to BB's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to BB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs GETVV Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, GETVV has a market cap of 2.07B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while GETVV trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas GETVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to GETVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to GETVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs TDC Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, TDC has a market cap of 2.06B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while TDC trades at $21.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas TDC's P/E ratio is 15.27. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to TDC's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to TDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs RAMP Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, RAMP has a market cap of 2.03B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while RAMP trades at $30.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas RAMP's P/E ratio is -772.25. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to RAMP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to RAMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs FIVN Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, FIVN has a market cap of 2.03B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while FIVN trades at $26.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas FIVN's P/E ratio is -442.83. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to FIVN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to FIVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs AVDX Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, AVDX has a market cap of 2.01B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while AVDX trades at $9.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas AVDX's P/E ratio is 243.50. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to AVDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is more volatile compared to AVDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs FORG Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, FORG has a market cap of 1.95B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while FORG trades at $23.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas FORG's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to FORG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to FORG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs GSKY Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, GSKY has a market cap of 1.88B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while GSKY trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas GSKY's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to GSKY's ROE of +5.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to GSKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs CSGS Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, CSGS has a market cap of 1.84B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while CSGS trades at $63.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas CSGS's P/E ratio is 21.76. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CSGS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is more volatile compared to CSGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs EVCM Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, EVCM has a market cap of 1.77B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while EVCM trades at $9.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas EVCM's P/E ratio is -81.00. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to EVCM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to EVCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs GET Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, GET has a market cap of 1.75B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while GET trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas GET's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to GET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to GET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs STER Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, STER has a market cap of 1.64B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while STER trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas STER's P/E ratio is -98.47. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to STER's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is more volatile compared to STER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs NTCT Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, NTCT has a market cap of 1.63B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while NTCT trades at $22.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas NTCT's P/E ratio is -4.46. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to NTCT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT and NTCT have similar daily volatility (1.09).
FLT vs ZUO Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, ZUO has a market cap of 1.54B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while ZUO trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas ZUO's P/E ratio is -19.65. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ZUO's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is more volatile compared to ZUO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs CORZW Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, CORZW has a market cap of 1.53B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while CORZW trades at $5.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas CORZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CORZW's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to CORZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs SUMO Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, SUMO has a market cap of 1.49B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while SUMO trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas SUMO's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SUMO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is more volatile compared to SUMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs GB Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, GB has a market cap of 1.49B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while GB trades at $7.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas GB's P/E ratio is 25.62. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to GB's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is more volatile compared to GB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs RPD Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, RPD has a market cap of 1.47B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while RPD trades at $22.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas RPD's P/E ratio is 56.00. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to RPD's ROE of +9.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to RPD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs AVPTW Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, AVPTW has a market cap of 1.38B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while AVPTW trades at $6.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas AVPTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to AVPTW's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to AVPTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs TUYA Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, TUYA has a market cap of 1.30B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while TUYA trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas TUYA's P/E ratio is 60.50. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to TUYA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to TUYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs PAYA Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, PAYA has a market cap of 1.29B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while PAYA trades at $9.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas PAYA's P/E ratio is 139.14. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to PAYA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is more volatile compared to PAYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.
FLT vs ATEN Comparison
FLT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLT stands at 21.79B. In comparison, ATEN has a market cap of 1.23B. Regarding current trading prices, FLT is priced at $303.26, while ATEN trades at $17.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLT currently has a P/E ratio of 22.97, whereas ATEN's P/E ratio is 25.40. In terms of profitability, FLT's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ATEN's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FLT is less volatile compared to ATEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLT.