EngageSmart, Inc.
EngageSmart, Inc. ESMT Peers
See (ESMT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESMT | $23.05 | -0.09% | 3.88B | 153.67 | $0.15 | N/A |
| MSFT | $453.13 | +0.04% | 3.37T | 34.99 | $12.95 | +0.72% |
| ORCL | $159.22 | -2.29% | 446.49B | 37.46 | $4.25 | +1.06% |
| PLTR | $128.12 | -1.58% | 302.35B | 557.04 | $0.23 | N/A |
| ADBE | $404.45 | +1.25% | 172.38B | 26.71 | $15.14 | N/A |
| PANW | $192.90 | +1.05% | 127.72B | 108.98 | $1.77 | N/A |
| CRWD | $431.84 | -0.94% | 107.56B | -4798.22 | -$0.09 | N/A |
| SNPS | $514.48 | -0.61% | 79.55B | 61.99 | $8.30 | N/A |
| FTNT | $102.56 | -0.65% | 78.50B | 42.21 | $2.43 | N/A |
| VMW | $142.48 | -4.96% | 61.52B | 42.92 | $3.32 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ESMT vs MSFT Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, MSFT has a market cap of 3.37T. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while MSFT trades at $453.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas MSFT's P/E ratio is 34.99. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MSFT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to MSFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs ORCL Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, ORCL has a market cap of 446.49B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while ORCL trades at $159.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas ORCL's P/E ratio is 37.46. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ORCL's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to ORCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs PLTR Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, PLTR has a market cap of 302.35B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while PLTR trades at $128.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas PLTR's P/E ratio is 557.04. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PLTR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to PLTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs ADBE Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 172.38B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while ADBE trades at $404.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 26.71. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs PANW Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, PANW has a market cap of 127.72B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while PANW trades at $192.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas PANW's P/E ratio is 108.98. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PANW's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to PANW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs CRWD Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, CRWD has a market cap of 107.56B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while CRWD trades at $431.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas CRWD's P/E ratio is -4798.22. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CRWD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to CRWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs SNPS Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, SNPS has a market cap of 79.55B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while SNPS trades at $514.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas SNPS's P/E ratio is 61.99. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SNPS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to SNPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs FTNT Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, FTNT has a market cap of 78.50B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while FTNT trades at $102.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas FTNT's P/E ratio is 42.21. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FTNT's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to FTNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs VMW Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, VMW has a market cap of 61.52B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while VMW trades at $142.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas VMW's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VMW's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to VMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs HOOD Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, HOOD has a market cap of 53.55B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while HOOD trades at $60.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas HOOD's P/E ratio is 34.67. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HOOD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to HOOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs NET Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, NET has a market cap of 52.96B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while NET trades at $152.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas NET's P/E ratio is -636.67. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NET's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to NET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs SQ Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, SQ has a market cap of 51.73B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while SQ trades at $83.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas SQ's P/E ratio is 49.98. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SQ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to SQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs ZS Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, ZS has a market cap of 38.05B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while ZS trades at $245.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas ZS's P/E ratio is -2459.20. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ZS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to ZS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs XYZ Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, XYZ has a market cap of 35.08B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while XYZ trades at $57.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas XYZ's P/E ratio is 13.84. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to XYZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to XYZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs CRWV Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, CRWV has a market cap of 30.61B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while CRWV trades at $65.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas CRWV's P/E ratio is -28.35. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CRWV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to CRWV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs NETE Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, NETE has a market cap of 27.82B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while NETE trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas NETE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NETE's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to NETE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs GDDY Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, GDDY has a market cap of 27.06B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while GDDY trades at $189.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas GDDY's P/E ratio is 36.59. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GDDY's ROE of +2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to GDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs IOT Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, IOT has a market cap of 26.72B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while IOT trades at $46.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas IOT's P/E ratio is -167.62. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IOT's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to IOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs VRSN Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, VRSN has a market cap of 26.45B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while VRSN trades at $281.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas VRSN's P/E ratio is 34.43. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VRSN's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to VRSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs SPLK Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, SPLK has a market cap of 26.44B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while SPLK trades at $156.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas SPLK's P/E ratio is 103.22. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SPLK's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is more volatile compared to SPLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs TOST Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, TOST has a market cap of 26.17B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while TOST trades at $45.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas TOST's P/E ratio is 167.52. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TOST's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to TOST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs CPAY Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, CPAY has a market cap of 24.46B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while CPAY trades at $346.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas CPAY's P/E ratio is 24.35. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CPAY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to CPAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs CHKP Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, CHKP has a market cap of 23.42B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while CHKP trades at $216.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas CHKP's P/E ratio is 28.55. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CHKP's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to CHKP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs FLT Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, FLT has a market cap of 21.79B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while FLT trades at $303.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas FLT's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FLT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to FLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs NTNX Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, NTNX has a market cap of 21.51B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while NTNX trades at $80.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas NTNX's P/E ratio is -310.23. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NTNX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to NTNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs OKTA Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, OKTA has a market cap of 20.79B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while OKTA trades at $124.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas OKTA's P/E ratio is 2073.17. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OKTA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to OKTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs GEN Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, GEN has a market cap of 17.85B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while GEN trades at $28.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas GEN's P/E ratio is 28.13. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GEN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to GEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs CYBR Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, CYBR has a market cap of 17.56B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while CYBR trades at $355.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas CYBR's P/E ratio is -175.77. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CYBR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to CYBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs AFRM Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, AFRM has a market cap of 16.69B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while AFRM trades at $51.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas AFRM's P/E ratio is -258.75. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AFRM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to AFRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs RBRK Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, RBRK has a market cap of 16.24B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while RBRK trades at $85.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas RBRK's P/E ratio is -11.43. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RBRK's ROE of +2.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to RBRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs FFIV Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, FFIV has a market cap of 16.23B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while FFIV trades at $282.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas FFIV's P/E ratio is 28.13. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FFIV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to FFIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs KSPI Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, KSPI has a market cap of 15.59B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while KSPI trades at $82.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas KSPI's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KSPI's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to KSPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs MDB Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, MDB has a market cap of 15.57B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while MDB trades at $190.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas MDB's P/E ratio is -110.76. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MDB's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to MDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs NLOK Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, NLOK has a market cap of 14.32B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while NLOK trades at $21.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas NLOK's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NLOK's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to NLOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs AKAM Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, AKAM has a market cap of 11.19B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while AKAM trades at $76.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas AKAM's P/E ratio is 25.67. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AKAM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to AKAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs SAIL Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, SAIL has a market cap of 10.37B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while SAIL trades at $18.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas SAIL's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SAIL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to SAIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs WIX Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, WIX has a market cap of 10.18B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while WIX trades at $182.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas WIX's P/E ratio is 77.83. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WIX's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to WIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs DOX Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, DOX has a market cap of 10.17B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while DOX trades at $90.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas DOX's P/E ratio is 19.38. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DOX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to DOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs KVYO Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, KVYO has a market cap of 9.64B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while KVYO trades at $34.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas KVYO's P/E ratio is -205.38. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KVYO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to KVYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs ALTR Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, ALTR has a market cap of 9.63B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while ALTR trades at $111.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas ALTR's P/E ratio is 699.06. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ALTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is more volatile compared to ALTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs PLAN Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, PLAN has a market cap of 9.59B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while PLAN trades at $63.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas PLAN's P/E ratio is -44.82. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PLAN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is more volatile compared to PLAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs DBX Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, DBX has a market cap of 8.48B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while DBX trades at $29.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas DBX's P/E ratio is 19.38. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DBX's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to DBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs CFLT Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, CFLT has a market cap of 7.73B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while CFLT trades at $22.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas CFLT's P/E ratio is -23.42. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CFLT's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to CFLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs PATH Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, PATH has a market cap of 7.21B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while PATH trades at $13.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas PATH's P/E ratio is -100.50. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PATH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to PATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs HCP Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, HCP has a market cap of 7.11B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while HCP trades at $34.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas HCP's P/E ratio is -57.97. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HCP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is more volatile compared to HCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs INFA Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, INFA has a market cap of 6.77B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while INFA trades at $19.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas INFA's P/E ratio is 652.67. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to INFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to INFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs JCOM Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, JCOM has a market cap of 6.75B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while JCOM trades at $142.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas JCOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to JCOM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to JCOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs SQSP Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, SQSP has a market cap of 6.47B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while SQSP trades at $46.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas SQSP's P/E ratio is -1164.25. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SQSP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is more volatile compared to SQSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs S Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, S has a market cap of 6.35B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while S trades at $20.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas S's P/E ratio is -21.88. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to S's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to S. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs NEWR Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, NEWR has a market cap of 6.18B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while NEWR trades at $86.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas NEWR's P/E ratio is -41.62. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NEWR's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is more volatile compared to NEWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs FOUR Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, FOUR has a market cap of 6.01B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while FOUR trades at $89.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas FOUR's P/E ratio is 30.51. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FOUR's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to FOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs CCCS Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, CCCS has a market cap of 5.92B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while CCCS trades at $8.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas CCCS's P/E ratio is 897.50. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CCCS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to CCCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs SPSC Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, SPSC has a market cap of 5.64B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while SPSC trades at $148.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas SPSC's P/E ratio is 69.44. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SPSC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to SPSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs ACIW Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, ACIW has a market cap of 5.12B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while ACIW trades at $48.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas ACIW's P/E ratio is 25.53. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ACIW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to ACIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs VRNS Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, VRNS has a market cap of 5.11B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while VRNS trades at $45.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas VRNS's P/E ratio is -56.42. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VRNS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to VRNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs QLYS Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, QLYS has a market cap of 4.94B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while QLYS trades at $135.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas QLYS's P/E ratio is 27.73. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to QLYS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to QLYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs NVEI Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, NVEI has a market cap of 4.84B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while NVEI trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas NVEI's P/E ratio is 212.44. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NVEI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is more volatile compared to NVEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs EEFT Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, EEFT has a market cap of 4.74B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while EEFT trades at $109.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas EEFT's P/E ratio is 16.23. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EEFT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to EEFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs WEX Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, WEX has a market cap of 4.70B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while WEX trades at $137.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas WEX's P/E ratio is 17.68. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WEX's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to WEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs BOX Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 4.69B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while BOX trades at $32.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 23.71. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BOX's ROE of +2.72%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to BOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs RELY Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, RELY has a market cap of 4.65B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while RELY trades at $22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas RELY's P/E ratio is -760.33. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RELY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to RELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs CLBT Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, CLBT has a market cap of 4.14B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while CLBT trades at $17.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas CLBT's P/E ratio is -12.79. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CLBT's ROE of -1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to CLBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs TENB Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, TENB has a market cap of 4.05B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while TENB trades at $33.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas TENB's P/E ratio is -87.13. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TENB's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to TENB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs AVPT Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, AVPT has a market cap of 3.98B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while AVPT trades at $19.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas AVPT's P/E ratio is -150.77. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AVPT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to AVPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs STNE Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, STNE has a market cap of 3.61B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while STNE trades at $13.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas STNE's P/E ratio is -17.03. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to STNE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to STNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs ODD Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, ODD has a market cap of 3.53B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while ODD trades at $63.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas ODD's P/E ratio is 36.35. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ODD's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to ODD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs SWI Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, SWI has a market cap of 3.20B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while SWI trades at $18.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas SWI's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SWI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is more volatile compared to SWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs DLO Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, DLO has a market cap of 3.19B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while DLO trades at $11.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas DLO's P/E ratio is 28.82. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DLO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to DLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs CORZ Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, CORZ has a market cap of 3.13B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while CORZ trades at $10.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas CORZ's P/E ratio is -2.68. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CORZ's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to CORZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs CORZZ Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, CORZZ has a market cap of 3.11B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while CORZZ trades at $10.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas CORZZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CORZZ's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to CORZZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs EVOP Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, EVOP has a market cap of 3.00B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while EVOP trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas EVOP's P/E ratio is -309.00. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EVOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to EVOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs PAGS Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, PAGS has a market cap of 2.95B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while PAGS trades at $8.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas PAGS's P/E ratio is 7.66. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PAGS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to PAGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs DOCN Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, DOCN has a market cap of 2.79B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while DOCN trades at $30.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas DOCN's P/E ratio is 27.40. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DOCN's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to DOCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs PAYO Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, PAYO has a market cap of 2.57B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while PAYO trades at $7.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas PAYO's P/E ratio is 25.36. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PAYO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to PAYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs APPN Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, APPN has a market cap of 2.46B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while APPN trades at $33.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas APPN's P/E ratio is -39.92. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to APPN's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to APPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs EVTC Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, EVTC has a market cap of 2.39B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while EVTC trades at $37.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas EVTC's P/E ratio is 18.64. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EVTC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to EVTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs MQ Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, MQ has a market cap of 2.34B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while MQ trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas MQ's P/E ratio is 50.00. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MQ's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to MQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs BB Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, BB has a market cap of 2.33B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while BB trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas BB's P/E ratio is -390.00. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BB's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to BB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs TDC Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, TDC has a market cap of 2.21B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while TDC trades at $23.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas TDC's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TDC's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to TDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs FIVN Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, FIVN has a market cap of 2.11B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while FIVN trades at $27.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas FIVN's P/E ratio is -461.17. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FIVN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to FIVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs GETVV Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, GETVV has a market cap of 2.07B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while GETVV trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas GETVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GETVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to GETVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs AVDX Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, AVDX has a market cap of 2.01B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while AVDX trades at $9.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas AVDX's P/E ratio is 243.50. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AVDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to AVDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs FORG Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, FORG has a market cap of 1.95B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while FORG trades at $23.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas FORG's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FORG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to FORG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs RAMP Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, RAMP has a market cap of 1.95B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while RAMP trades at $29.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas RAMP's P/E ratio is -740.75. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RAMP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to RAMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs EVCM Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, EVCM has a market cap of 1.95B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while EVCM trades at $10.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas EVCM's P/E ratio is -88.83. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EVCM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to EVCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs CSGS Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, CSGS has a market cap of 1.89B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while CSGS trades at $65.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas CSGS's P/E ratio is 22.23. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CSGS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to CSGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs GSKY Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, GSKY has a market cap of 1.88B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while GSKY trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas GSKY's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GSKY's ROE of +5.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to GSKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs GET Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, GET has a market cap of 1.75B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while GET trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas GET's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to GET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs NTCT Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, NTCT has a market cap of 1.66B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while NTCT trades at $23.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas NTCT's P/E ratio is -4.52. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NTCT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to NTCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs AVPTW Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, AVPTW has a market cap of 1.66B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while AVPTW trades at $8.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas AVPTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AVPTW's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to AVPTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs STER Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, STER has a market cap of 1.64B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while STER trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas STER's P/E ratio is -98.47. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to STER's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT and STER have similar daily volatility (0.24).
ESMT vs ZUO Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, ZUO has a market cap of 1.54B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while ZUO trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas ZUO's P/E ratio is -19.65. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ZUO's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to ZUO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs CORZW Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, CORZW has a market cap of 1.53B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while CORZW trades at $5.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas CORZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CORZW's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to CORZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs RPD Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, RPD has a market cap of 1.51B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while RPD trades at $23.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas RPD's P/E ratio is 58.88. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RPD's ROE of +9.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to RPD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs SUMO Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, SUMO has a market cap of 1.49B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while SUMO trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas SUMO's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SUMO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is more volatile compared to SUMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs GB Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, GB has a market cap of 1.49B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while GB trades at $7.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas GB's P/E ratio is 25.62. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GB's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is more volatile compared to GB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs TUYA Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, TUYA has a market cap of 1.42B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while TUYA trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas TUYA's P/E ratio is 265.00. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TUYA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to TUYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs PAYA Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, PAYA has a market cap of 1.29B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while PAYA trades at $9.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas PAYA's P/E ratio is 139.14. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PAYA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is more volatile compared to PAYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.
ESMT vs ATEN Comparison
ESMT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESMT stands at 3.88B. In comparison, ATEN has a market cap of 1.26B. Regarding current trading prices, ESMT is priced at $23.05, while ATEN trades at $17.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESMT currently has a P/E ratio of 153.67, whereas ATEN's P/E ratio is 26.12. In terms of profitability, ESMT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ATEN's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ESMT is less volatile compared to ATEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESMT.