Eventbrite, Inc.
Eventbrite, Inc. EB Peers
See (EB) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EB | $2.36 | +1.51% | 225.82M | -12.39 | -$0.19 | N/A |
| SAP | $296.59 | +0.76% | 346.00B | 54.42 | $5.45 | +0.69% |
| CRM | $291.17 | +0.14% | 279.37B | 45.71 | $6.37 | +0.55% |
| NOW | $1,040.25 | +0.49% | 215.33B | 141.53 | $7.35 | N/A |
| UBER | $91.78 | +1.80% | 191.93B | 16.07 | $5.71 | N/A |
| INTU | $670.28 | +1.36% | 187.38B | 62.58 | $10.71 | +0.60% |
| SHOP | $106.15 | +4.34% | 137.45B | 68.48 | $1.55 | N/A |
| APP | $362.34 | -1.16% | 122.61B | 65.40 | $5.54 | N/A |
| MSTR | $399.80 | +0.70% | 109.31B | -17.98 | -$22.23 | N/A |
| CDNS | $321.56 | +0.88% | 87.80B | 81.82 | $3.93 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
EB vs SAP Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 346.00B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while SAP trades at $296.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 54.42. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs CRM Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 279.37B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while CRM trades at $291.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 45.71. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs NOW Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 215.33B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while NOW trades at $1,040.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 141.53. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs UBER Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 191.93B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while UBER trades at $91.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 16.07. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs INTU Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 187.38B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while INTU trades at $670.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 62.58. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs SHOP Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 137.45B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while SHOP trades at $106.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 68.48. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs APP Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 122.61B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while APP trades at $362.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 65.40. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs MSTR Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 109.31B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while MSTR trades at $399.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -17.98. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs CDNS Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 87.80B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while CDNS trades at $321.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 81.82. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs WDAY Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 73.08B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while WDAY trades at $273.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 140.03. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs ADSK Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 63.77B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while ADSK trades at $298.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 58.33. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs SNOW Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 61.12B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while SNOW trades at $183.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is -47.46. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs TEAM Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 58.12B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while TEAM trades at $220.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is -133.01. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs FICO Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 53.59B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while FICO trades at $2,201.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 95.01. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs DDOG Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 40.64B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while DDOG trades at $117.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 250.36. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs TTD Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, TTD has a market cap of 37.50B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while TTD trades at $76.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas TTD's P/E ratio is 93.06. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to TTD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to TTD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs HUBS Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 34.85B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while HUBS trades at $660.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is -1436.37. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to HUBS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs ANSS Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 30.47B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while ANSS trades at $346.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 51.51. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs ZM Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 25.81B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while ZM trades at $84.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 26.36. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs TYL Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 24.88B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while TYL trades at $577.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 86.90. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs STRK Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 24.49B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while STRK trades at $96.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to STRK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs DUOL Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 24.05B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while DUOL trades at $529.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 282.91. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs STRF Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 23.84B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while STRF trades at $98.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to STRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs PTC Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 20.74B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while PTC trades at $172.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 47.50. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs GRAB Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 20.13B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while GRAB trades at $5.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 509.00. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs SSNC Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 19.63B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while SSNC trades at $79.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 24.72. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs DOCU Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 18.72B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while DOCU trades at $92.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 18.19. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs GWRE Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 18.19B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while GWRE trades at $216.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is -1141.47. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to GWRE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs AZPN Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.73B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while AZPN trades at $264.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to AZPN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs DT Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 15.98B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while DT trades at $53.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 33.57. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs PAYC Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 15.06B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while PAYC trades at $260.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 29.23. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs MNDY Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 14.88B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while MNDY trades at $293.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 293.13. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs BSY Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 14.00B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while BSY trades at $47.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 61.50. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs BKI Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.88B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while BKI trades at $75.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs MANH Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 11.81B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while MANH trades at $194.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 55.57. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs TTAN Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 11.72B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while TTAN trades at $129.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is -15.15. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs PCTY Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 11.10B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while PCTY trades at $201.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 50.26. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs XM Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11.01B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while XM trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs CDAY Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.85B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while CDAY trades at $69.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to CDAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs PCOR Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 10.60B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while PCOR trades at $71.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is -82.63. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs NICE Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 10.34B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while NICE trades at $163.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 24.14. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs DSGX Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 9.69B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while DSGX trades at $113.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 69.21. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs ESTC Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 9.64B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while ESTC trades at $92.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is -70.46. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ESTC's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs DAY Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 9.60B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while DAY trades at $60.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is 375.38. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to DAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs U Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, U has a market cap of 9.49B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while U trades at $22.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas U's P/E ratio is -20.37. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to U's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs QXO Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, QXO has a market cap of 8.71B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while QXO trades at $16.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas QXO's P/E ratio is -47.97. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to QXO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to QXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs GTLB Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 8.51B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while GTLB trades at $51.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is -1287.25. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to GTLB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs PEGA Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 8.47B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while PEGA trades at $98.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 45.82. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs NATI Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 7.97B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while NATI trades at $59.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs SMAR Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.91B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while SMAR trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs APPF Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 7.89B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while APPF trades at $218.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 40.77. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs CVLT Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 7.86B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while CVLT trades at $178.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 104.73. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs SRAD Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 7.46B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while SRAD trades at $23.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 126.21. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs OTEX Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 7.29B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while OTEX trades at $28.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 11.53. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs LYFT Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 6.91B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while LYFT trades at $16.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 111.80. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs CWAN Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 6.75B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while CWAN trades at $23.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is 14.02. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to CWAN's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs COUP Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.12B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while COUP trades at $80.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to COUP's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs VERX Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, VERX has a market cap of 6.05B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while VERX trades at $38.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas VERX's P/E ratio is -131.57. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to VERX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to VERX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs BULL Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 5.73B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while BULL trades at $12.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is -12.17. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BULL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs IDCC Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 5.67B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while IDCC trades at $218.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 17.29. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs QTWO Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 5.67B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while QTWO trades at $91.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is -267.72. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to QTWO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs SYT Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, SYT has a market cap of 5.64B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while SYT trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas SYT's P/E ratio is 8.48. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SYT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to SYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs ETWO-WT Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, ETWO-WT has a market cap of 5.46B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while ETWO-WT trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas ETWO-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ETWO-WT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to ETWO-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs FROG Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 4.94B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while FROG trades at $43.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is -60.72. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs BILL Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 4.77B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while BILL trades at $46.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is -2314.00. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs INTA Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, INTA has a market cap of 4.72B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while INTA trades at $58.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas INTA's P/E ratio is -242.83. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to INTA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to INTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs LIF Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 4.61B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while LIF trades at $60.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is -1004.33. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to LIF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs GRND Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, GRND has a market cap of 4.60B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while GRND trades at $23.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas GRND's P/E ratio is -39.15. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to GRND's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to GRND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs FRSH Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, FRSH has a market cap of 4.57B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while FRSH trades at $15.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas FRSH's P/E ratio is -64.54. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FRSH's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to FRSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs RUM Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 4.55B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while RUM trades at $10.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -7.17. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to RUM's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to RUM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs SOUN Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, SOUN has a market cap of 4.50B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while SOUN trades at $11.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas SOUN's P/E ratio is -18.34. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SOUN's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to SOUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs RUMBW Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, RUMBW has a market cap of 4.41B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while RUMBW trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas RUMBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to RUMBW's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to RUMBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs ASAN Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, ASAN has a market cap of 4.29B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while ASAN trades at $18.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas ASAN's P/E ratio is -16.42. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ASAN's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to ASAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs CVT Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.19B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while CVT trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs PYCR Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.09B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while PYCR trades at $22.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs WK Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 3.99B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while WK trades at $71.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas WK's P/E ratio is -61.66. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to WK's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to WK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs BRZE Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, BRZE has a market cap of 3.86B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while BRZE trades at $36.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas BRZE's P/E ratio is -36.17. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BRZE's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to BRZE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs PWSC Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.80B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while PWSC trades at $22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs ZI Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.77B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while ZI trades at $10.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 85.92. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs AYX Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.53B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while AYX trades at $48.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs ENV Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.49B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while ENV trades at $63.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs BL Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, BL has a market cap of 3.46B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while BL trades at $55.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas BL's P/E ratio is 40.25. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BL's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to BL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs INST Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.46B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while INST trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs ZETA Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 3.29B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while ZETA trades at $13.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is -55.80. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs COMP Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 3.28B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while COMP trades at $6.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is -48.35. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to COMP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs RIOT Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, RIOT has a market cap of 3.27B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while RIOT trades at $9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas RIOT's P/E ratio is -6.68. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to RIOT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to RIOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs ALKT Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, ALKT has a market cap of 3.18B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while ALKT trades at $30.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas ALKT's P/E ratio is -83.49. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ALKT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to ALKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs BLKB Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, BLKB has a market cap of 3.13B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while BLKB trades at $64.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas BLKB's P/E ratio is -11.51. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BLKB's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to BLKB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs ALIT Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, ALIT has a market cap of 3.04B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while ALIT trades at $5.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas ALIT's P/E ratio is -96.08. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ALIT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to ALIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs ALRM Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, ALRM has a market cap of 2.97B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while ALRM trades at $59.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas ALRM's P/E ratio is 25.16. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ALRM's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to ALRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs CALX Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, CALX has a market cap of 2.94B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while CALX trades at $45.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas CALX's P/E ratio is -87.35. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to CALX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to CALX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs GBTG Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 2.92B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while GBTG trades at $6.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is -60.90. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to GBTG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs BTDR Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, BTDR has a market cap of 2.86B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while BTDR trades at $15.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas BTDR's P/E ratio is -3.48. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BTDR's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to BTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs NCNO Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, NCNO has a market cap of 2.83B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while NCNO trades at $24.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas NCNO's P/E ratio is -74.55. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to NCNO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to NCNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs PAR Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, PAR has a market cap of 2.83B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while PAR trades at $69.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas PAR's P/E ratio is -27.37. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to PAR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to PAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs CLSK Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, CLSK has a market cap of 2.75B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while CLSK trades at $9.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas CLSK's P/E ratio is -8.81. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to CLSK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to CLSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs PRGS Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, PRGS has a market cap of 2.72B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while PRGS trades at $63.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas PRGS's P/E ratio is 49.70. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to PRGS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to PRGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs RNG Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, RNG has a market cap of 2.53B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while RNG trades at $28.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas RNG's P/E ratio is -65.30. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to RNG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to RNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.
EB vs DAVEW Comparison
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 225.82M. In comparison, DAVEW has a market cap of 2.53B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $2.36, while DAVEW trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -12.39, whereas DAVEW's P/E ratio is -3.30. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.10%, compared to DAVEW's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to DAVEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.