Eventbrite, Inc.

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 190.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while SAP trades at $163.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 23.20. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check SAP's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 154.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while CRM trades at $164.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 21.18. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check CRM's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 145.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while UBER trades at $70.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 14.90. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check UBER's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 144.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while SHOP trades at $110.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 117.85. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check SHOP's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 132.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while APP trades at $391.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 38.95. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.49%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check APP's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 97.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while INTU trades at $350.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 22.80. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check INTU's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 86.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while NOW trades at $83.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 49.69. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check NOW's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 72.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while CDNS trades at $265.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 65.60. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check CDNS's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 46.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while ADSK trades at $218.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 41.85. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check ADSK's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 41.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while SNOW trades at $121.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is -30.65. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check SNOW's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 37.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while DDOG trades at $105.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 339.90. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check DDOG's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 35.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while MSTR trades at $128.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -8.45. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check MSTR's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while ANSS trades at $374.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 55.53. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check ANSS's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while WDAY trades at $112.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 43.46. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check WDAY's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, STRC has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while STRC trades at $100.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas STRC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to STRC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to STRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check STRC's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while STRF trades at $97.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check STRF's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, GTOP has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while GTOP trades at $39.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas GTOP's P/E ratio is 35.78. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GTOP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to GTOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check GTOP's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while ZM trades at $79.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 12.82. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check ZM's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while FICO trades at $922.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 34.18. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check FICO's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while STRK trades at $73.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check STRK's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, BVC has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while BVC trades at $10.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas BVC's P/E ratio is -150.29. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to BVC's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to BVC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check BVC's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while AZPN trades at $264.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to AZPN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check AZPN's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while SSNC trades at $67.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 21.35. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check SSNC's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while PTC trades at $133.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 19.65. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check PTC's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while TEAM trades at $57.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is -79.37. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check TEAM's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while GRAB trades at $3.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 61.33. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check GRAB's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while TYL trades at $317.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 43.98. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check TYL's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while BKI trades at $75.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check BKI's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while DAY trades at $69.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is -73.54. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to DAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check DAY's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while XM trades at $18.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check XM's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while CDAY trades at $69.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CDAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check CDAY's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while HUBS trades at $192.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is 226.19. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to HUBS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check HUBS's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while GWRE trades at $117.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 53.34. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check GWRE's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while DT trades at $32.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 53.94. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check DT's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, TTD has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while TTD trades at $20.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas TTD's P/E ratio is 22.32. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TTD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to TTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check TTD's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, U has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while U trades at $21.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas U's P/E ratio is -22.52. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to U's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check U's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while BSY trades at $31.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 36.82. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check BSY's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while IDCC trades at $352.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 29.85. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check IDCC's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, FIG has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while FIG trades at $18.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas FIG's P/E ratio is -4.89. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to FIG's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to FIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check FIG's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, YMM has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while YMM trades at $8.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas YMM's P/E ratio is 13.57. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to YMM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to YMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check YMM's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, OCFT has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while OCFT trades at $7.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas OCFT's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to OCFT's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to OCFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check OCFT's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while DOCU trades at $42.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 28.98. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check DOCU's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while NATI trades at $59.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check NATI's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while SMAR trades at $56.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check SMAR's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while PCOR trades at $47.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is -70.42. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check PCOR's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while MANH trades at $120.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 33.58. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check MANH's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while CWAN trades at $24.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is -171.43. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CWAN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check CWAN's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while PEGA trades at $39.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 18.48. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check PEGA's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while PAYC trades at $113.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 14.06. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check PAYC's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while COUP trades at $80.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check COUP's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, OS has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while OS trades at $24.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas OS's P/E ratio is -85.71. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to OS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to OS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check OS's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while NICE trades at $97.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 10.03. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check NICE's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while DSGX trades at $63.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 33.73. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check DSGX's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while LYFT trades at $13.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 1.93. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check LYFT's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while TTAN trades at $55.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is -31.96. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check TTAN's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while OTEX trades at $20.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 12.19. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check OTEX's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while PCTY trades at $95.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 22.38. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check PCTY's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while FROG trades at $43.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is -69.71. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check FROG's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while APPF trades at $143.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 36.85. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check APPF's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while SRAD trades at $15.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 42.97. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check SRAD's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while ESTC trades at $43.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is -54.80. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ESTC's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check ESTC's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, KC has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while KC trades at $15.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas KC's P/E ratio is -30.22. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to KC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to KC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check KC's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, YOU has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while YOU trades at $46.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas YOU's P/E ratio is 41.23. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to YOU's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to YOU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check YOU's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, GRND-WT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while GRND-WT trades at $6.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas GRND-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GRND-WT's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to GRND-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check GRND-WT's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while DUOL trades at $90.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 10.57. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check DUOL's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while CVT trades at $8.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check CVT's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while PYCR trades at $22.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check PYCR's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while COMP trades at $7.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is -71.40. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to COMP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check COMP's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while CVLT trades at $88.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 46.29. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check CVLT's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while PWSC trades at $22.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check PWSC's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while ZETA trades at $14.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is -104.36. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check ZETA's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while AYX trades at $48.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check AYX's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, FSLY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while FSLY trades at $23.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas FSLY's P/E ratio is -27.80. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to FSLY's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to FSLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check FSLY's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while ENV trades at $63.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check ENV's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while BILL trades at $34.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is -150.91. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to BILL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check BILL's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while INST trades at $23.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check INST's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while ZI trades at $9.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 77.92. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check ZI's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while GTLB trades at $19.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is -57.12. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GTLB's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check GTLB's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, NATL has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while NATL trades at $44.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas NATL's P/E ratio is 20.65. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NATL's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to NATL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check NATL's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, CALX has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while CALX trades at $47.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas CALX's P/E ratio is 183.69. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CALX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to CALX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check CALX's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while LIF trades at $38.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 21.53. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to LIF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check LIF's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while MNDY trades at $58.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 26.25. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check MNDY's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, RNG has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while RNG trades at $33.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas RNG's P/E ratio is 69.77. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to RNG's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to RNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check RNG's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, DBD has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while DBD trades at $84.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas DBD's P/E ratio is 33.42. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to DBD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to DBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check DBD's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while WK trades at $52.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas WK's P/E ratio is -111.36. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to WK's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to WK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check WK's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, ADEA has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while ADEA trades at $26.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas ADEA's P/E ratio is 27.14. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ADEA's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to ADEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check ADEA's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while GBTG trades at $5.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is 25.41. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GBTG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check GBTG's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, NAVN has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while NAVN trades at $12.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas NAVN's P/E ratio is -3.05. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NAVN's ROE of -2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to NAVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check NAVN's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while QTWO trades at $45.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is 57.35. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to QTWO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check QTWO's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, SOUN has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while SOUN trades at $6.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas SOUN's P/E ratio is -22.96. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SOUN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to SOUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check SOUN's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while BULL trades at $4.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is -4.01. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to BULL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check BULL's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, CLSK has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while CLSK trades at $10.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas CLSK's P/E ratio is -9.45. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CLSK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to CLSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check CLSK's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, DCT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while DCT trades at $18.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas DCT's P/E ratio is -172.64. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to DCT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to DCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check DCT's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while DAVE trades at $185.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 13.71. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check DAVE's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, SPNS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while SPNS trades at $43.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas SPNS's P/E ratio is 37.78. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SPNS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to SPNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check SPNS's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, NP has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while NP trades at $24.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas NP's P/E ratio is -95.04. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NP's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to NP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check NP's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, GRND has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while GRND trades at $12.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas GRND's P/E ratio is 28.09. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GRND's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to GRND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check GRND's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, BTDR has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while BTDR trades at $10.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas BTDR's P/E ratio is -7.68. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to BTDR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to BTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check BTDR's competition here

EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, FRSH has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while FRSH trades at $7.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas FRSH's P/E ratio is 11.98. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to FRSH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to FRSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check FRSH's competition here