Eventbrite, Inc. (EB) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (EB) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EB | $4.51 | +1.46% | 440.5M | -41.00 | -$0.11 | N/A |
| SAP | $154.46 | -0.49% | 174.3B | 20.63 | $7.25 | +1.94% |
| APP | $466.54 | -0.67% | 157.7B | 40.78 | $11.51 | N/A |
| UBER | $71.11 | -0.74% | 145.4B | 17.73 | $4.03 | N/A |
| SHOP | $108.27 | -0.53% | 140.1B | 105.86 | $1.02 | N/A |
| CRM | $152.47 | +0.45% | 123B | 17.38 | $8.64 | +1.13% |
| CDNS | $383.72 | -0.95% | 107.3B | 90.47 | $4.30 | N/A |
| NOW | $95.88 | +0.88% | 96B | 55.38 | $1.68 | N/A |
| DDOG | $224.00 | +0.45% | 78.8B | 582.55 | $0.38 | N/A |
| SNOW | $223.39 | -3.83% | 78.5B | -64.19 | -$3.53 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
EB vs SAP Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 174.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while SAP trades at $154.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 20.63. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check SAP's competition here
EB vs APP Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 157.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while APP trades at $466.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 40.78. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check APP's competition here
EB vs UBER Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 145.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while UBER trades at $71.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check UBER's competition here
EB vs SHOP Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 140.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while SHOP trades at $108.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 105.86. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check SHOP's competition here
EB vs CRM Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 123B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while CRM trades at $152.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 17.38. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check CRM's competition here
EB vs CDNS Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 107.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while CDNS trades at $383.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 90.47. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check CDNS's competition here
EB vs NOW Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 96B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while NOW trades at $95.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 55.38. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check NOW's competition here
EB vs DDOG Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 78.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while DDOG trades at $224.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 582.55. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check DDOG's competition here
EB vs SNOW Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 78.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while SNOW trades at $223.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is -64.19. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check SNOW's competition here
EB vs ADBE Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 77.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while ADBE trades at $198.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check ADBE's competition here
EB vs INTU Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 73B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while INTU trades at $258.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 16.30. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check INTU's competition here
EB vs ADSK Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 39.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while ADSK trades at $190.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 27.44. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check ADSK's competition here
EB vs ANSS Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while ANSS trades at $374.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 55.53. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check ANSS's competition here
EB vs ROP Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, ROP has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while ROP trades at $330.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas ROP's P/E ratio is 20.29. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ROP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to ROP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check ROP's competition here
EB vs MSTR Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 32.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while MSTR trades at $106.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -2.96. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check MSTR's competition here
EB vs WDAY Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while WDAY trades at $117.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 35.11. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check WDAY's competition here
EB vs STRF Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while STRF trades at $90.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check STRF's competition here
EB vs STRC Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, STRC has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while STRC trades at $87.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas STRC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to STRC's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to STRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check STRC's competition here
EB vs FICO Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while FICO trades at $1,102.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 34.54. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check FICO's competition here
EB vs ZM Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while ZM trades at $85.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check ZM's competition here
EB vs TEAM Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while TEAM trades at $81.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is -97.51. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check TEAM's competition here
EB vs STRK Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while STRK trades at $59.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check STRK's competition here
EB vs AZPN Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while AZPN trades at $264.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to AZPN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check AZPN's competition here
EB vs SSNC Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while SSNC trades at $65.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 20.23. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check SSNC's competition here
EB vs GRABW Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, GRABW has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while GRABW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas GRABW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GRABW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to GRABW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check GRABW's competition here
EB vs GRAB Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while GRAB trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 87.25. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check GRAB's competition here
EB vs PTC Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while PTC trades at $116.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 11.06. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check PTC's competition here
EB vs BKI Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while BKI trades at $75.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check BKI's competition here
EB vs U Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, U has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while U trades at $27.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas U's P/E ratio is -17.29. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to U's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check U's competition here
EB vs DT Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while DT trades at $40.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 74.93. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check DT's competition here
EB vs TYL Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while TYL trades at $280.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 37.96. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check TYL's competition here
EB vs DAY Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while DAY trades at $69.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is -73.54. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to DAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check DAY's competition here
EB vs XM Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while XM trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check XM's competition here
EB vs CDAY Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while CDAY trades at $69.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CDAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check CDAY's competition here
EB vs FROG Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while FROG trades at $78.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is -150.74. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check FROG's competition here
EB vs FIG Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, FIG has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while FIG trades at $19.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas FIG's P/E ratio is -4.69. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to FIG's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to FIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check FIG's competition here
EB vs HUBS Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while HUBS trades at $174.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is 91.01. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to HUBS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check HUBS's competition here
EB vs OCFT Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, OCFT has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while OCFT trades at $7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas OCFT's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to OCFT's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to OCFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check OCFT's competition here
EB vs GWRE Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while GWRE trades at $104.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 55.18. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check GWRE's competition here
EB vs BSY Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while BSY trades at $29.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 33.18. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check BSY's competition here
EB vs YMM Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, YMM has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while YMM trades at $7.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas YMM's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to YMM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to YMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check YMM's competition here
EB vs DOCU Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while DOCU trades at $43.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 27.73. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check DOCU's competition here
EB vs NATI Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while NATI trades at $59.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check NATI's competition here
EB vs SMAR Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while SMAR trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check SMAR's competition here
EB vs IDCC Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while IDCC trades at $294.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 28.42. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check IDCC's competition here
EB vs MANH Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while MANH trades at $133.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 36.07. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check MANH's competition here
EB vs CWAN Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while CWAN trades at $24.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is -136.25. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CWAN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check CWAN's competition here
EB vs PAYC Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while PAYC trades at $126.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 14.33. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check PAYC's competition here
EB vs COUP Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while COUP trades at $80.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check COUP's competition here
EB vs ESTC Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while ESTC trades at $59.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is 17.12. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ESTC's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check ESTC's competition here
EB vs TTAN Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while TTAN trades at $62.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is -42.86. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check TTAN's competition here
EB vs COMP Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while COMP trades at $9.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is 488.25. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to COMP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check COMP's competition here
EB vs DUOL Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while DUOL trades at $128.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 14.56. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check DUOL's competition here
EB vs PCOR Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while PCOR trades at $39.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is -76.39. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check PCOR's competition here
EB vs DSGX Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while DSGX trades at $67.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 33.06. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check DSGX's competition here
EB vs LYFT Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while LYFT trades at $14.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 2.08. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check LYFT's competition here
EB vs PCTY Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while PCTY trades at $101.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 21.26. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check PCTY's competition here
EB vs YOU Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, YOU has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while YOU trades at $52.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas YOU's P/E ratio is 41.58. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to YOU's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to YOU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check YOU's competition here
EB vs CVLT Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while CVLT trades at $127.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 79.25. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check CVLT's competition here
EB vs APPF Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while APPF trades at $148.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 34.38. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check APPF's competition here
EB vs NAVN Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, NAVN has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while NAVN trades at $21.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas NAVN's P/E ratio is -15.36. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NAVN's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to NAVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check NAVN's competition here
EB vs NICE Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while NICE trades at $85.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 9.97. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check NICE's competition here
EB vs PEGA Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while PEGA trades at $29.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 15.88. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check PEGA's competition here
EB vs GBTG Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while GBTG trades at $9.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is 58.56. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GBTG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check GBTG's competition here
EB vs OTEX Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while OTEX trades at $20.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 9.71. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check OTEX's competition here
EB vs OCTVV Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, OCTVV has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while OCTVV trades at $17.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas OCTVV's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to OCTVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to OCTVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check OCTVV's competition here
EB vs ZETA Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while ZETA trades at $19.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is -184.50. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check ZETA's competition here
EB vs GRND-WT Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, GRND-WT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while GRND-WT trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas GRND-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GRND-WT's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to GRND-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check GRND-WT's competition here
EB vs DAVEW Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, DAVEW has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while DAVEW trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas DAVEW's P/E ratio is -6.80. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to DAVEW's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to DAVEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check DAVEW's competition here
EB vs GTLB Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while GTLB trades at $26.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is -172.20. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GTLB's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check GTLB's competition here
EB vs SRAD Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while SRAD trades at $14.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 58.32. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check SRAD's competition here
EB vs OCTV Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, OCTV has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while OCTV trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas OCTV's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to OCTV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to OCTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check OCTV's competition here
EB vs CVT Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while CVT trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check CVT's competition here
EB vs DAVE Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while DAVE trades at $311.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 19.90. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check DAVE's competition here
EB vs PYCR Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while PYCR trades at $22.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check PYCR's competition here
EB vs BTDR Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, BTDR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while BTDR trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas BTDR's P/E ratio is -10.63. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to BTDR's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to BTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check BTDR's competition here
EB vs STUB Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, STUB has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while STUB trades at $11.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas STUB's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to STUB's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to STUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check STUB's competition here
EB vs LIF Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while LIF trades at $47.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 27.41. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to LIF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check LIF's competition here
EB vs PWSC Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while PWSC trades at $22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check PWSC's competition here
EB vs BULL Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while BULL trades at $6.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is -5.49. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to BULL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check BULL's competition here
EB vs MNDY Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while MNDY trades at $70.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 30.72. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check MNDY's competition here
EB vs AYX Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while AYX trades at $48.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check AYX's competition here
EB vs ADEA Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, ADEA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while ADEA trades at $30.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas ADEA's P/E ratio is 29.18. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ADEA's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to ADEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check ADEA's competition here
EB vs ENV Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while ENV trades at $63.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check ENV's competition here
EB vs INST Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while INST trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check INST's competition here
EB vs ZI Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while ZI trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 77.92. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check ZI's competition here
EB vs BOX Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while BOX trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 38.09. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to BOX's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to BOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check BOX's competition here
EB vs PTRN Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, PTRN has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while PTRN trades at $20.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas PTRN's P/E ratio is -25.95. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PTRN's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to PTRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check PTRN's competition here
EB vs NATL Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, NATL has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while NATL trades at $43.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas NATL's P/E ratio is 19.44. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NATL's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to NATL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check NATL's competition here
EB vs BILL Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while BILL trades at $32.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is -139.00. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check BILL's competition here
EB vs SOUNW Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, SOUNW has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while SOUNW trades at $1.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas SOUNW's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SOUNW's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is more volatile compared to SOUNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check SOUNW's competition here
EB vs PPLI Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, PPLI has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while PPLI trades at $41.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas PPLI's P/E ratio is 25.47. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PPLI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to PPLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check PPLI's competition here
EB vs RNG Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, RNG has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while RNG trades at $35.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas RNG's P/E ratio is 37.05. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to RNG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to RNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check RNG's competition here
EB vs SOUN Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, SOUN has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while SOUN trades at $6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas SOUN's P/E ratio is -9.83. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SOUN's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to SOUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check SOUN's competition here
EB vs RUM Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while RUM trades at $6.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -15.81. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to RUM's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to RUM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check RUM's competition here
EB vs KC Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, KC has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while KC trades at $9.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas KC's P/E ratio is -19.18. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to KC's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to KC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check KC's competition here
EB vs DBD Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, DBD has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while DBD trades at $81.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas DBD's P/E ratio is 28.62. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to DBD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to DBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check DBD's competition here
EB vs BRUN Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, BRUN has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while BRUN trades at $33.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas BRUN's P/E ratio is -82.64. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to BRUN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to BRUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check BRUN's competition here
EB vs NP Comparison June 2026
EB plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EB stands at 440.5M. In comparison, NP has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EB is priced at $4.51, while NP trades at $28.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EB currently has a P/E ratio of -41.00, whereas NP's P/E ratio is -159.22. In terms of profitability, EB's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NP's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EB is less volatile compared to NP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EB.Check NP's competition here