Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.
Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. (CWAN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CWAN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CWAN | $20.53 | -1.53% | 5.9B | 12.81 | $1.60 | N/A |
| SAP | $270.26 | -0.31% | 315.4B | 41.74 | $6.48 | +0.97% |
| CRM | $247.87 | -0.17% | 237B | 38.85 | $6.38 | +0.66% |
| UBER | $95.16 | -1.68% | 198.4B | 16.21 | $5.87 | N/A |
| INTU | $656.96 | -0.86% | 183.3B | 53.59 | $12.26 | +0.63% |
| NOW | $879.94 | -0.77% | 183B | 110.25 | $7.98 | N/A |
| SHOP | $140.53 | -1.11% | 182.6B | 78.07 | $1.80 | N/A |
| APP | $450.68 | +2.04% | 152.4B | 61.82 | $7.29 | N/A |
| MSTR | $343.20 | -4.17% | 97.3B | 24.08 | $14.25 | N/A |
| CDNS | $345.19 | -1.27% | 94.1B | 93.04 | $3.71 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CWAN vs SAP Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 315.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while SAP trades at $270.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 41.74. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check SAP's competition here
CWAN vs CRM Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 237B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while CRM trades at $247.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 38.85. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check CRM's competition here
CWAN vs UBER Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 198.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while UBER trades at $95.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 16.21. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check UBER's competition here
CWAN vs INTU Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 183.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while INTU trades at $656.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 53.59. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check INTU's competition here
CWAN vs NOW Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 183B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while NOW trades at $879.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 110.25. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check NOW's competition here
CWAN vs SHOP Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 182.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while SHOP trades at $140.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 78.07. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check SHOP's competition here
CWAN vs APP Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 152.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while APP trades at $450.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 61.82. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check APP's competition here
CWAN vs MSTR Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 97.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while MSTR trades at $343.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is 24.08. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MSTR's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check MSTR's competition here
CWAN vs CDNS Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 94.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while CDNS trades at $345.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 93.04. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check CDNS's competition here
CWAN vs SNOW Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 65B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while SNOW trades at $194.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is -46.47. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check SNOW's competition here
CWAN vs ADSK Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 61B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while ADSK trades at $285.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 61.10. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check ADSK's competition here
CWAN vs WDAY Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 59.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while WDAY trades at $223.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 124.80. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check WDAY's competition here
CWAN vs DDOG Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 44.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while DDOG trades at $128.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 366.80. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check DDOG's competition here
CWAN vs TEAM Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 44.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while TEAM trades at $168.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is -173.89. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check TEAM's competition here
CWAN vs FICO Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 34.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while FICO trades at $1,423.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 55.59. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check FICO's competition here
CWAN vs ANSS Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while ANSS trades at $374.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 55.53. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check ANSS's competition here
CWAN vs STRF Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 31.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while STRF trades at $111.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to STRF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check STRF's competition here
CWAN vs PTC Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while PTC trades at $214.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 50.32. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check PTC's competition here
CWAN vs TTD Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, TTD has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while TTD trades at $52.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas TTD's P/E ratio is 63.10. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to TTD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to TTD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check TTD's competition here
CWAN vs STRK Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while STRK trades at $94.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to STRK's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check STRK's competition here
CWAN vs HUBS Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while HUBS trades at $467.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is -1949.87. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to HUBS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check HUBS's competition here
CWAN vs ZM Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while ZM trades at $81.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 21.41. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check ZM's competition here
CWAN vs TYL Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while TYL trades at $554.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 79.16. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check TYL's competition here
CWAN vs SSNC Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while SSNC trades at $89.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 28.20. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check SSNC's competition here
CWAN vs GRAB Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while GRAB trades at $5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 250.50. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check GRAB's competition here
CWAN vs GWRE Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while GWRE trades at $211.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 491.30. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check GWRE's competition here
CWAN vs U Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, U has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while U trades at $39.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas U's P/E ratio is -37.53. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to U's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check U's competition here
CWAN vs AZPN Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while AZPN trades at $264.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to AZPN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check AZPN's competition here
CWAN vs BSY Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while BSY trades at $53.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 69.17. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check BSY's competition here
CWAN vs DOCU Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while DOCU trades at $73.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 14.06. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check DOCU's competition here
CWAN vs DUOL Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while DUOL trades at $321.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 130.67. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check DUOL's competition here
CWAN vs DT Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while DT trades at $48.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 29.88. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check DT's competition here
CWAN vs QXO Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, QXO has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while QXO trades at $20.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas QXO's P/E ratio is 2.22. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to QXO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to QXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check QXO's competition here
CWAN vs PAYC Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while PAYC trades at $230.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 31.14. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check PAYC's competition here
CWAN vs MANH Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while MANH trades at $214.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 59.85. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check MANH's competition here
CWAN vs BKI Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while BKI trades at $75.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check BKI's competition here
CWAN vs DAY Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while DAY trades at $69.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is 231.57. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to DAY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check DAY's competition here
CWAN vs XM Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while XM trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check XM's competition here
CWAN vs CDAY Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while CDAY trades at $69.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CDAY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check CDAY's competition here
CWAN vs PCOR Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while PCOR trades at $66.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is -69.19. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check PCOR's competition here
CWAN vs PCTY Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while PCTY trades at $179.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 44.64. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check PCTY's competition here
CWAN vs APPF Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while APPF trades at $274.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 49.69. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check APPF's competition here
CWAN vs SRAD Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while SRAD trades at $31.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 78.83. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check SRAD's competition here
CWAN vs TTAN Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while TTAN trades at $101.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is -27.35. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check TTAN's competition here
CWAN vs PEGA Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while PEGA trades at $52.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 43.30. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check PEGA's competition here
CWAN vs MNDY Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while MNDY trades at $175.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 230.78. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check MNDY's competition here
CWAN vs NICE Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while NICE trades at $140.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 16.82. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check NICE's competition here
CWAN vs DSGX Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while DSGX trades at $99.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 60.18. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check DSGX's competition here
CWAN vs ESTC Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while ESTC trades at $78.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is -75.95. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ESTC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check ESTC's competition here
CWAN vs OTEX Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while OTEX trades at $32.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 19.53. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check OTEX's competition here
CWAN vs NATI Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while NATI trades at $59.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check NATI's competition here
CWAN vs SMAR Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while SMAR trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SMAR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check SMAR's competition here
CWAN vs CVLT Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while CVLT trades at $177.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 99.13. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check CVLT's competition here
CWAN vs GTLB Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while GTLB trades at $45.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is 502.56. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to GTLB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check GTLB's competition here
CWAN vs BULL Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while BULL trades at $14.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is 12.06. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to BULL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check BULL's competition here
CWAN vs LIF Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while LIF trades at $89.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 235.82. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to LIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check LIF's competition here
CWAN vs IDCC Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while IDCC trades at $265.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 18.82. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check IDCC's competition here
CWAN vs LYFT Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while LYFT trades at $17.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 74.13. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check LYFT's competition here
CWAN vs COUP Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while COUP trades at $80.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check COUP's competition here
CWAN vs SOUNW Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, SOUNW has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while SOUNW trades at $5.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas SOUNW's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SOUNW's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to SOUNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check SOUNW's competition here
CWAN vs FROG Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while FROG trades at $47.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is -61.69. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check FROG's competition here
CWAN vs COMP Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while COMP trades at $9.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is -95.30. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to COMP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check COMP's competition here
CWAN vs SOUN Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, SOUN has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while SOUN trades at $12.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas SOUN's P/E ratio is -17.81. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SOUN's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to SOUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check SOUN's competition here
CWAN vs RIOT Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, RIOT has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while RIOT trades at $13.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas RIOT's P/E ratio is -33.20. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to RIOT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to RIOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check RIOT's competition here
CWAN vs QTWO Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while QTWO trades at $77.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is 1288.18. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to QTWO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check QTWO's competition here
CWAN vs ZETA Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while ZETA trades at $19.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is -131.37. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check ZETA's competition here
CWAN vs WK Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while WK trades at $78.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas WK's P/E ratio is -66.01. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to WK's ROE of +1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to WK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check WK's competition here
CWAN vs BILL Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while BILL trades at $41.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is -2053.00. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check BILL's competition here
CWAN vs CVT Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while CVT trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check CVT's competition here
CWAN vs PYCR Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while PYCR trades at $22.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check PYCR's competition here
CWAN vs VERX Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, VERX has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while VERX trades at $25.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas VERX's P/E ratio is -76.85. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to VERX's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to VERX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check VERX's competition here
CWAN vs FRSH Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, FRSH has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while FRSH trades at $13.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas FRSH's P/E ratio is -75.39. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to FRSH's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to FRSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check FRSH's competition here
CWAN vs GBTG Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while GBTG trades at $8.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is -68.08. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to GBTG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check GBTG's competition here
CWAN vs CALX Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, CALX has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while CALX trades at $58.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas CALX's P/E ratio is -143.41. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CALX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to CALX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check CALX's competition here
CWAN vs PWSC Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while PWSC trades at $22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check PWSC's competition here
CWAN vs INTA Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, INTA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while INTA trades at $43.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas INTA's P/E ratio is -189.57. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to INTA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to INTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check INTA's competition here
CWAN vs AYX Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while AYX trades at $48.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check AYX's competition here
CWAN vs ENV Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while ENV trades at $63.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check ENV's competition here
CWAN vs INST Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while INST trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check INST's competition here
CWAN vs YOU Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, YOU has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while YOU trades at $36.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas YOU's P/E ratio is 22.11. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to YOU's ROE of +1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to YOU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check YOU's competition here
CWAN vs ZI Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while ZI trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 77.92. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check ZI's competition here
CWAN vs ASAN Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ASAN has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while ASAN trades at $14.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas ASAN's P/E ratio is -14.14. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ASAN's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to ASAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check ASAN's competition here
CWAN vs NCNO Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, NCNO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while NCNO trades at $28.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas NCNO's P/E ratio is -113.48. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to NCNO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to NCNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check NCNO's competition here
CWAN vs RUM Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while RUM trades at $7.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to RUM's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to RUM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check RUM's competition here
CWAN vs BL Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, BL has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while BL trades at $53.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas BL's P/E ratio is 41.09. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to BL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to BL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check BL's competition here
CWAN vs BLKB Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, BLKB has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while BLKB trades at $65.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas BLKB's P/E ratio is -11.88. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to BLKB's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to BLKB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check BLKB's competition here
CWAN vs AGYS Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, AGYS has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while AGYS trades at $108.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas AGYS's P/E ratio is 221.27. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to AGYS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to AGYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check AGYS's competition here
CWAN vs GRND Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, GRND has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while GRND trades at $15.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas GRND's P/E ratio is -40.01. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to GRND's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to GRND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check GRND's competition here
CWAN vs NATL Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, NATL has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while NATL trades at $39.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas NATL's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to NATL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to NATL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check NATL's competition here
CWAN vs ALRM Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ALRM has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while ALRM trades at $57.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas ALRM's P/E ratio is 24.30. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ALRM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to ALRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check ALRM's competition here
CWAN vs RUMBW Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, RUMBW has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while RUMBW trades at $2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas RUMBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to RUMBW's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to RUMBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check RUMBW's competition here
CWAN vs RNG Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, RNG has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while RNG trades at $31.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas RNG's P/E ratio is -240.15. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to RNG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to RNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check RNG's competition here
CWAN vs BRZE Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, BRZE has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while BRZE trades at $26.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas BRZE's P/E ratio is -25.76. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to BRZE's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to BRZE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check BRZE's competition here
CWAN vs DAVE Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while DAVE trades at $198.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 52.38. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check DAVE's competition here
CWAN vs DV Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, DV has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while DV trades at $16.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas DV's P/E ratio is 52.42. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to DV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to DV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check DV's competition here
CWAN vs CLSK Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, CLSK has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while CLSK trades at $9.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas CLSK's P/E ratio is 10.99. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CLSK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to CLSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check CLSK's competition here
CWAN vs ALKT Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ALKT has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while ALKT trades at $24.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas ALKT's P/E ratio is -65.50. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ALKT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to ALKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check ALKT's competition here
CWAN vs BTDR Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, BTDR has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while BTDR trades at $13.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas BTDR's P/E ratio is -2.73. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to BTDR's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to BTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check BTDR's competition here
CWAN vs DCT Comparison August 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 5.9B. In comparison, DCT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $20.53, while DCT trades at $18.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.81, whereas DCT's P/E ratio is -172.64. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.36%, compared to DCT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to DCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check DCT's competition here