Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.
Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. (CWAN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CWAN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CWAN | $21.47 | +0.73% | 6.1B | 12.64 | $1.70 | N/A |
| SAP | $288.06 | +0.01% | 328.8B | 43.17 | $6.54 | +0.93% |
| CRM | $271.08 | +0.73% | 258.3B | 42.35 | $6.38 | +0.61% |
| INTU | $798.10 | +1.55% | 222.8B | 65.15 | $12.26 | +0.52% |
| NOW | $999.98 | +3.22% | 204.9B | 124.08 | $7.94 | N/A |
| UBER | $86.93 | -4.78% | 189.4B | 15.86 | $5.71 | N/A |
| SHOP | $126.19 | +1.41% | 164.6B | 103.12 | $1.23 | N/A |
| APP | $367.99 | +1.06% | 125.5B | 67.07 | $5.53 | N/A |
| MSTR | $402.26 | -0.89% | 114.5B | -18.16 | -$22.24 | N/A |
| STRK | $105.13 | -2.57% | 110.9B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CWAN vs SAP Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 328.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while SAP trades at $288.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 43.17. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check SAP's competition here
CWAN vs CRM Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 258.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while CRM trades at $271.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 42.35. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check CRM's competition here
CWAN vs INTU Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 222.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while INTU trades at $798.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 65.15. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check INTU's competition here
CWAN vs NOW Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 204.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while NOW trades at $999.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 124.08. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check NOW's competition here
CWAN vs UBER Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 189.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while UBER trades at $86.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 15.86. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check UBER's competition here
CWAN vs SHOP Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 164.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while SHOP trades at $126.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 103.12. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check SHOP's competition here
CWAN vs APP Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 125.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while APP trades at $367.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 67.07. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check APP's competition here
CWAN vs MSTR Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 114.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while MSTR trades at $402.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -18.16. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check MSTR's competition here
CWAN vs STRK Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 110.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while STRK trades at $105.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check STRK's competition here
CWAN vs CDNS Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 91.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while CDNS trades at $366.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 84.48. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check CDNS's competition here
CWAN vs SNOW Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 73B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while SNOW trades at $220.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is -52.19. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check SNOW's competition here
CWAN vs ADSK Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 65.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while ADSK trades at $306.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 65.22. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check ADSK's competition here
CWAN vs WDAY Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 63.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while WDAY trades at $239.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 132.98. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check WDAY's competition here
CWAN vs TEAM Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 53.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while TEAM trades at $201.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is -123.07. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check TEAM's competition here
CWAN vs DDOG Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 52.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while DDOG trades at $151.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 327.76. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check DDOG's competition here
CWAN vs TTD Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, TTD has a market cap of 43.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while TTD trades at $86.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas TTD's P/E ratio is 107.88. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to TTD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to TTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check TTD's competition here
CWAN vs FICO Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while FICO trades at $1,512.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 65.02. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check FICO's competition here
CWAN vs ANSS Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while ANSS trades at $374.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 55.70. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check ANSS's competition here
CWAN vs HUBS Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while HUBS trades at $557.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is -1243.51. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to HUBS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check HUBS's competition here
CWAN vs STRF Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while STRF trades at $115.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check STRF's competition here
CWAN vs PTC Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while PTC trades at $204.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 56.04. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check PTC's competition here
CWAN vs TYL Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while TYL trades at $557.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 84.06. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check TYL's competition here
CWAN vs ZM Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while ZM trades at $75.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 22.64. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check ZM's competition here
CWAN vs SSNC Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while SSNC trades at $85.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 26.87. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check SSNC's competition here
CWAN vs GRAB Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while GRAB trades at $5.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 528.00. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check GRAB's competition here
CWAN vs GWRE Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while GWRE trades at $224.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 540.93. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check GWRE's competition here
CWAN vs BSY Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while BSY trades at $59.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 75.28. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check BSY's competition here
CWAN vs AZPN Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while AZPN trades at $264.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to AZPN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check AZPN's competition here
CWAN vs DT Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while DT trades at $54.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 34.41. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check DT's competition here
CWAN vs DOCU Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while DOCU trades at $80.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 15.28. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check DOCU's competition here
CWAN vs DUOL Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while DUOL trades at $332.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 166.88. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check DUOL's competition here
CWAN vs QXO Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, QXO has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while QXO trades at $21.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas QXO's P/E ratio is -62.24. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to QXO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to QXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check QXO's competition here
CWAN vs MNDY Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while MNDY trades at $283.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 286.93. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check MNDY's competition here
CWAN vs U Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, U has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while U trades at $33.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas U's P/E ratio is -29.91. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to U's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check U's competition here
CWAN vs PAYC Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while PAYC trades at $234.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 33.69. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check PAYC's competition here
CWAN vs MANH Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while MANH trades at $220.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 62.04. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check MANH's competition here
CWAN vs BKI Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while BKI trades at $75.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check BKI's competition here
CWAN vs PCOR Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while PCOR trades at $77.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is -89.19. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check PCOR's competition here
CWAN vs XM Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while XM trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check XM's competition here
CWAN vs CDAY Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while CDAY trades at $69.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to CDAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check CDAY's competition here
CWAN vs NICE Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while NICE trades at $166.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 23.79. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check NICE's competition here
CWAN vs TTAN Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while TTAN trades at $118.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is -31.71. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check TTAN's competition here
CWAN vs PCTY Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while PCTY trades at $186.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 46.57. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check PCTY's competition here
CWAN vs PEGA Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while PEGA trades at $59.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 49.14. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check PEGA's competition here
CWAN vs DAY Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while DAY trades at $59.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is 368.56. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to DAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check DAY's competition here
CWAN vs APPF Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while APPF trades at $262.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 48.51. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check APPF's competition here
CWAN vs ESTC Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while ESTC trades at $89.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is -85.50. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to ESTC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check ESTC's competition here
CWAN vs DSGX Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while DSGX trades at $106.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 64.72. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check DSGX's competition here
CWAN vs SRAD Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while SRAD trades at $27.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 139.95. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check SRAD's competition here
CWAN vs GTLB Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while GTLB trades at $47.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is 537.56. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to GTLB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check GTLB's competition here
CWAN vs NATI Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while NATI trades at $59.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check NATI's competition here
CWAN vs SMAR Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while SMAR trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check SMAR's competition here
CWAN vs OTEX Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while OTEX trades at $30.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 12.34. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check OTEX's competition here
CWAN vs BULL Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while BULL trades at $14.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is 12.68. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to BULL's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check BULL's competition here
CWAN vs CVLT Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while CVLT trades at $186.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 97.28. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check CVLT's competition here
CWAN vs COUP Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while COUP trades at $80.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check COUP's competition here
CWAN vs LYFT Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while LYFT trades at $13.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 94.40. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check LYFT's competition here
CWAN vs LIF Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while LIF trades at $77.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 585.92. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to LIF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check LIF's competition here
CWAN vs IDCC Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while IDCC trades at $224.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check IDCC's competition here
CWAN vs QTWO Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while QTWO trades at $92.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is -267.06. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to QTWO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check QTWO's competition here
CWAN vs VERX Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, VERX has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while VERX trades at $34.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas VERX's P/E ratio is -116.90. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to VERX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to VERX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check VERX's competition here
CWAN vs RIOT Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, RIOT has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while RIOT trades at $14.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas RIOT's P/E ratio is -10.59. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to RIOT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to RIOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check RIOT's competition here
CWAN vs FROG Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while FROG trades at $42.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is -60.07. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check FROG's competition here
CWAN vs BILL Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while BILL trades at $45.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is -2303.50. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check BILL's competition here
CWAN vs SOUN Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, SOUN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while SOUN trades at $10.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas SOUN's P/E ratio is -18.43. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to SOUN's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to SOUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check SOUN's competition here
CWAN vs CVT Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while CVT trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check CVT's competition here
CWAN vs FRSH Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, FRSH has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while FRSH trades at $13.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas FRSH's P/E ratio is -58.33. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to FRSH's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to FRSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check FRSH's competition here
CWAN vs PYCR Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while PYCR trades at $22.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check PYCR's competition here
CWAN vs RUM Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while RUM trades at $8.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -6.22. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to RUM's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to RUM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check RUM's competition here
CWAN vs RUMBW Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, RUMBW has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while RUMBW trades at $2.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas RUMBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to RUMBW's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to RUMBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check RUMBW's competition here
CWAN vs COMP Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while COMP trades at $7.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is -56.54. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to COMP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check COMP's competition here
CWAN vs WK Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while WK trades at $67.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas WK's P/E ratio is -59.04. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to WK's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to WK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check WK's competition here
CWAN vs PWSC Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while PWSC trades at $22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check PWSC's competition here
CWAN vs ZETA Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while ZETA trades at $15.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is -64.30. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check ZETA's competition here
CWAN vs ZI Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while ZI trades at $10.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 85.92. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check ZI's competition here
CWAN vs ETWO-WT Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, ETWO-WT has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while ETWO-WT trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas ETWO-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to ETWO-WT's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to ETWO-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check ETWO-WT's competition here
CWAN vs CALX Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, CALX has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while CALX trades at $56.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas CALX's P/E ratio is -137.73. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to CALX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to CALX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check CALX's competition here
CWAN vs ASAN Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, ASAN has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while ASAN trades at $15.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas ASAN's P/E ratio is -15.04. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to ASAN's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to ASAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check ASAN's competition here
CWAN vs AYX Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while AYX trades at $48.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check AYX's competition here
CWAN vs NCNO Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, NCNO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while NCNO trades at $30.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas NCNO's P/E ratio is -121.44. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to NCNO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to NCNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check NCNO's competition here
CWAN vs GRND Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, GRND has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while GRND trades at $17.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas GRND's P/E ratio is -29.77. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to GRND's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to GRND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check GRND's competition here
CWAN vs ENV Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while ENV trades at $63.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check ENV's competition here
CWAN vs BL Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, BL has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while BL trades at $56.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas BL's P/E ratio is 40.36. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to BL's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to BL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check BL's competition here
CWAN vs INST Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while INST trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check INST's competition here
CWAN vs CLSK Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, CLSK has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while CLSK trades at $11.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas CLSK's P/E ratio is -10.84. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to CLSK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to CLSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check CLSK's competition here
CWAN vs INTA Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, INTA has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while INTA trades at $42.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas INTA's P/E ratio is -171.50. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to INTA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to INTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check INTA's competition here
CWAN vs AGYS Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, AGYS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while AGYS trades at $117.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas AGYS's P/E ratio is 240.73. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to AGYS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to AGYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check AGYS's competition here
CWAN vs BRZE Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, BRZE has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while BRZE trades at $29.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas BRZE's P/E ratio is -29.49. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to BRZE's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to BRZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check BRZE's competition here
CWAN vs GBTG Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while GBTG trades at $6.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is -67.05. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to GBTG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check GBTG's competition here
CWAN vs BLKB Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, BLKB has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while BLKB trades at $63.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas BLKB's P/E ratio is -11.44. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to BLKB's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to BLKB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check BLKB's competition here
CWAN vs ALIT Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, ALIT has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while ALIT trades at $5.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas ALIT's P/E ratio is -94.67. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to ALIT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to ALIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check ALIT's competition here
CWAN vs ALKT Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, ALKT has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while ALKT trades at $28.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas ALKT's P/E ratio is -76.22. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to ALKT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to ALKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check ALKT's competition here
CWAN vs DAVE Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while DAVE trades at $225.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 59.87. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check DAVE's competition here
CWAN vs DAVEW Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, DAVEW has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while DAVEW trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas DAVEW's P/E ratio is -7.14. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to DAVEW's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to DAVEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check DAVEW's competition here
CWAN vs BTDR Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, BTDR has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while BTDR trades at $14.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas BTDR's P/E ratio is -2.99. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to BTDR's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to BTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check BTDR's competition here
CWAN vs YOU Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, YOU has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while YOU trades at $30.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas YOU's P/E ratio is 18.59. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to YOU's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to YOU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check YOU's competition here
CWAN vs ALRM Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, ALRM has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while ALRM trades at $55.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas ALRM's P/E ratio is 23.57. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to ALRM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is more volatile compared to ALRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check ALRM's competition here
CWAN vs PAR Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, PAR has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while PAR trades at $67.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas PAR's P/E ratio is -26.65. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to PAR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to PAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check PAR's competition here
CWAN vs DV Comparison July 2025
CWAN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWAN stands at 6.1B. In comparison, DV has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CWAN is priced at $21.47, while DV trades at $15.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWAN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.64, whereas DV's P/E ratio is 55.12. In terms of profitability, CWAN's ROE is +0.59%, compared to DV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CWAN is less volatile compared to DV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWAN.Check DV's competition here