CSG Systems International, Inc.
CSG Systems International, Inc. CSGS Peers
See (CSGS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSGS | $65.80 | -0.75% | 1.9B | 22.53 | $2.92 | +1.84% |
| MSFT | $457.36 | -0.72% | 3.4T | 35.32 | $12.95 | +0.70% |
| ORCL | $163.84 | +1.19% | 459.4B | 38.46 | $4.26 | +1.05% |
| PLTR | $123.76 | +0.30% | 292.1B | 538.09 | $0.23 | N/A |
| ADBE | $412.08 | -0.25% | 175.6B | 27.24 | $15.13 | N/A |
| PANW | $187.83 | +0.20% | 125.2B | 107.95 | $1.74 | N/A |
| CRWD | $468.99 | -0.69% | 116.8B | -5210.94 | -$0.09 | N/A |
| FTNT | $104.51 | -0.22% | 80B | 43.01 | $2.43 | N/A |
| SNPS | $462.43 | -9.64% | 71.5B | 55.45 | $8.34 | N/A |
| VMW | $142.48 | -4.96% | 61.5B | 42.92 | $3.32 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CSGS vs MSFT Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MSFT has a market cap of 3.4T. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while MSFT trades at $457.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas MSFT's P/E ratio is 35.32. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MSFT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is more volatile compared to MSFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs ORCL Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ORCL has a market cap of 459.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while ORCL trades at $163.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas ORCL's P/E ratio is 38.46. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ORCL's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is more volatile compared to ORCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs PLTR Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PLTR has a market cap of 292.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while PLTR trades at $123.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas PLTR's P/E ratio is 538.09. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PLTR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to PLTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs ADBE Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 175.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while ADBE trades at $412.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 27.24. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is more volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs PANW Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PANW has a market cap of 125.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while PANW trades at $187.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas PANW's P/E ratio is 107.95. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PANW's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is more volatile compared to PANW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs CRWD Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CRWD has a market cap of 116.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while CRWD trades at $468.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas CRWD's P/E ratio is -5210.94. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CRWD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is more volatile compared to CRWD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs FTNT Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, FTNT has a market cap of 80B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while FTNT trades at $104.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas FTNT's P/E ratio is 43.01. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to FTNT's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is more volatile compared to FTNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs SNPS Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SNPS has a market cap of 71.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while SNPS trades at $462.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas SNPS's P/E ratio is 55.45. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SNPS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to SNPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs VMW Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, VMW has a market cap of 61.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while VMW trades at $142.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas VMW's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to VMW's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is more volatile compared to VMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs HOOD Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, HOOD has a market cap of 57.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while HOOD trades at $65.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas HOOD's P/E ratio is 37.21. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to HOOD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to HOOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs NET Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NET has a market cap of 56.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while NET trades at $161.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas NET's P/E ratio is -674.71. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to NET's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is more volatile compared to NET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs CRWV Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CRWV has a market cap of 55.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while CRWV trades at $116.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas CRWV's P/E ratio is -45.73. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CRWV's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to CRWV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs SQ Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SQ has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while SQ trades at $83.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas SQ's P/E ratio is 49.98. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SQ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to SQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs ZS Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ZS has a market cap of 39.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while ZS trades at $253.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas ZS's P/E ratio is -2536.50. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ZS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is more volatile compared to ZS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs XYZ Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, XYZ has a market cap of 38B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while XYZ trades at $61.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas XYZ's P/E ratio is 14.99. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to XYZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is more volatile compared to XYZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs NETE Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NETE has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while NETE trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas NETE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to NETE's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to NETE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs IOT Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, IOT has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while IOT trades at $46.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas IOT's P/E ratio is -166.00. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to IOT's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to IOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs SPLK Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SPLK has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while SPLK trades at $156.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas SPLK's P/E ratio is 103.22. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SPLK's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is more volatile compared to SPLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs GDDY Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GDDY has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while GDDY trades at $179.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas GDDY's P/E ratio is 34.39. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GDDY's ROE of +2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is more volatile compared to GDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs VRSN Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, VRSN has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while VRSN trades at $269.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas VRSN's P/E ratio is 32.94. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to VRSN's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is more volatile compared to VRSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs TOST Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TOST has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while TOST trades at $42.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas TOST's P/E ratio is 155.96. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TOST's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is more volatile compared to TOST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs CHKP Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CHKP has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while CHKP trades at $224.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas CHKP's P/E ratio is 29.63. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CHKP's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to CHKP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs CPAY Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CPAY has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while CPAY trades at $328.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas CPAY's P/E ratio is 23.09. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CPAY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to CPAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs FLT Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, FLT has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while FLT trades at $303.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas FLT's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to FLT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is more volatile compared to FLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs NTNX Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NTNX has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while NTNX trades at $78.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas NTNX's P/E ratio is -303.35. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to NTNX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is more volatile compared to NTNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs CYBR Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CYBR has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while CYBR trades at $381.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas CYBR's P/E ratio is -188.71. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CYBR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to CYBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs RBRK Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, RBRK has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while RBRK trades at $94.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas RBRK's P/E ratio is -12.58. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to RBRK's ROE of +2.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to RBRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs OKTA Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, OKTA has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while OKTA trades at $105.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas OKTA's P/E ratio is 1754.08. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to OKTA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to OKTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs GEN Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GEN has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while GEN trades at $28.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas GEN's P/E ratio is 27.24. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GEN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is more volatile compared to GEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs AFRM Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AFRM has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while AFRM trades at $50.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas AFRM's P/E ratio is -266.74. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AFRM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to AFRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs FFIV Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, FFIV has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while FFIV trades at $283.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas FFIV's P/E ratio is 26.50. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to FFIV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is more volatile compared to FFIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs KSPI Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, KSPI has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while KSPI trades at $81.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas KSPI's P/E ratio is 7.52. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to KSPI's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to KSPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs MDB Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MDB has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while MDB trades at $188.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas MDB's P/E ratio is -108.30. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MDB's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is more volatile compared to MDB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs NLOK Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NLOK has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while NLOK trades at $21.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas NLOK's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to NLOK's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to NLOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs AKAM Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AKAM has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while AKAM trades at $76.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas AKAM's P/E ratio is 25.65. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AKAM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is more volatile compared to AKAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs DOX Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, DOX has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while DOX trades at $91.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas DOX's P/E ratio is 19.18. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to DOX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is more volatile compared to DOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs SAIL Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SAIL has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while SAIL trades at $17.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas SAIL's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SAIL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to SAIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs ALTR Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ALTR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while ALTR trades at $111.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas ALTR's P/E ratio is 699.06. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ALTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is more volatile compared to ALTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs PLAN Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PLAN has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while PLAN trades at $63.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas PLAN's P/E ratio is -44.82. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PLAN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is more volatile compared to PLAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs KVYO Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, KVYO has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while KVYO trades at $33.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas KVYO's P/E ratio is -197.88. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to KVYO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is more volatile compared to KVYO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs WIX Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, WIX has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while WIX trades at $152.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas WIX's P/E ratio is 60.19. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to WIX's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to WIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs INFA Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, INFA has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while INFA trades at $24.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas INFA's P/E ratio is 810.00. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to INFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is more volatile compared to INFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs DBX Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, DBX has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while DBX trades at $28.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas DBX's P/E ratio is 18.86. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to DBX's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is more volatile compared to DBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs CFLT Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CFLT has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while CFLT trades at $22.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas CFLT's P/E ratio is -23.34. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CFLT's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to CFLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs HCP Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, HCP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while HCP trades at $34.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas HCP's P/E ratio is -57.97. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to HCP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is more volatile compared to HCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs PATH Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PATH has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while PATH trades at $12.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas PATH's P/E ratio is -99.77. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PATH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to PATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs JCOM Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, JCOM has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while JCOM trades at $142.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas JCOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to JCOM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to JCOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs SQSP Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SQSP has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while SQSP trades at $46.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas SQSP's P/E ratio is -1164.25. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SQSP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is more volatile compared to SQSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs S Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, S has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while S trades at $19.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas S's P/E ratio is -21.40. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to S's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to S. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs NEWR Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NEWR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while NEWR trades at $86.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas NEWR's P/E ratio is -41.62. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to NEWR's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is more volatile compared to NEWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs FOUR Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, FOUR has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while FOUR trades at $90.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas FOUR's P/E ratio is 30.46. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to FOUR's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to FOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs CCCS Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CCCS has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while CCCS trades at $8.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas CCCS's P/E ratio is 868.00. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CCCS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to CCCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs SPSC Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SPSC has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while SPSC trades at $142.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas SPSC's P/E ratio is 66.71. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SPSC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to SPSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs BOX Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while BOX trades at $36.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 27.10. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BOX's ROE of +2.72%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to BOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs VRNS Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, VRNS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while VRNS trades at $47.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas VRNS's P/E ratio is -58.26. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to VRNS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is more volatile compared to VRNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs QLYS Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, QLYS has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while QLYS trades at $136.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas QLYS's P/E ratio is 27.80. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to QLYS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is more volatile compared to QLYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs ACIW Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ACIW has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while ACIW trades at $46.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas ACIW's P/E ratio is 18.29. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ACIW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is more volatile compared to ACIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs NVEI Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NVEI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while NVEI trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas NVEI's P/E ratio is 212.44. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to NVEI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is more volatile compared to NVEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs WEX Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, WEX has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while WEX trades at $136.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas WEX's P/E ratio is 17.60. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to WEX's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is more volatile compared to WEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs EEFT Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, EEFT has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while EEFT trades at $107.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas EEFT's P/E ratio is 15.90. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to EEFT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to EEFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs RELY Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, RELY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while RELY trades at $21.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas RELY's P/E ratio is -717.33. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to RELY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to RELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs CLBT Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CLBT has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while CLBT trades at $16.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas CLBT's P/E ratio is -18.45. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CLBT's ROE of -1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is more volatile compared to CLBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs ODD Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ODD has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while ODD trades at $72.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas ODD's P/E ratio is 41.51. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ODD's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to ODD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs TENB Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TENB has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while TENB trades at $32.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas TENB's P/E ratio is -84.22. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TENB's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to TENB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs ESMT Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ESMT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while ESMT trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas ESMT's P/E ratio is 153.67. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ESMT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is more volatile compared to ESMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs AVPT Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AVPT has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while AVPT trades at $18.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas AVPT's P/E ratio is -143.00. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AVPT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is more volatile compared to AVPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs STNE Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, STNE has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while STNE trades at $13.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas STNE's P/E ratio is -17.10. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to STNE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to STNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs CORZZ Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CORZZ has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while CORZZ trades at $10.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas CORZZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CORZZ's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to CORZZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs CORZ Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CORZ has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while CORZ trades at $10.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas CORZ's P/E ratio is -2.75. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CORZ's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to CORZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs SWI Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SWI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while SWI trades at $18.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas SWI's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SWI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is more volatile compared to SWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs DLO Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, DLO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while DLO trades at $11.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas DLO's P/E ratio is 23.02. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to DLO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to DLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs EVOP Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, EVOP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while EVOP trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas EVOP's P/E ratio is -309.00. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to EVOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is more volatile compared to EVOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs PAGS Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PAGS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while PAGS trades at $8.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas PAGS's P/E ratio is 7.17. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PAGS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to PAGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs DOCN Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, DOCN has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while DOCN trades at $28.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas DOCN's P/E ratio is 24.96. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to DOCN's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to DOCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs MQ Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MQ has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while MQ trades at $5.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas MQ's P/E ratio is 52.70. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MQ's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is more volatile compared to MQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs PAYO Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PAYO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while PAYO trades at $6.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas PAYO's P/E ratio is 24.34. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PAYO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to PAYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs BB Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BB has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while BB trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas BB's P/E ratio is -409.00. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BB's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to BB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs EVTC Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, EVTC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while EVTC trades at $36.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas EVTC's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to EVTC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is more volatile compared to EVTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs APPN Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, APPN has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while APPN trades at $31.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas APPN's P/E ratio is -37.63. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to APPN's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to APPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs RAMP Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, RAMP has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while RAMP trades at $32.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas RAMP's P/E ratio is -819.25. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to RAMP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to RAMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs TDC Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TDC has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while TDC trades at $21.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas TDC's P/E ratio is 15.06. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TDC's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to TDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs GETVV Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GETVV has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while GETVV trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas GETVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GETVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to GETVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs FIVN Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, FIVN has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while FIVN trades at $27.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas FIVN's P/E ratio is -451.83. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to FIVN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to FIVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs AVDX Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AVDX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while AVDX trades at $9.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas AVDX's P/E ratio is 244.75. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AVDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is more volatile compared to AVDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs FORG Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, FORG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while FORG trades at $23.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas FORG's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to FORG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to FORG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs GSKY Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GSKY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while GSKY trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas GSKY's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GSKY's ROE of +5.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to GSKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs EVCM Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, EVCM has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while EVCM trades at $10.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas EVCM's P/E ratio is -83.83. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to EVCM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to EVCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs GET Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while GET trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas GET's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to GET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs NTCT Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NTCT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while NTCT trades at $23.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas NTCT's P/E ratio is -4.56. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to NTCT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is more volatile compared to NTCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs STER Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, STER has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while STER trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas STER's P/E ratio is -98.47. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to STER's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is more volatile compared to STER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs CORZW Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CORZW has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while CORZW trades at $5.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas CORZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CORZW's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to CORZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs ZUO Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ZUO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while ZUO trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas ZUO's P/E ratio is -19.65. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ZUO's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is more volatile compared to ZUO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs SUMO Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SUMO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while SUMO trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas SUMO's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SUMO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is more volatile compared to SUMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs AVPTW Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AVPTW has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while AVPTW trades at $7.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas AVPTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AVPTW's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to AVPTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs GB Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while GB trades at $7.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas GB's P/E ratio is 25.66. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GB's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is more volatile compared to GB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs RPD Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, RPD has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while RPD trades at $22.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas RPD's P/E ratio is 54.56. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to RPD's ROE of +9.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to RPD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs TUYA Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TUYA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while TUYA trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas TUYA's P/E ratio is 63.75. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TUYA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to TUYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs PGY Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PGY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while PGY trades at $17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas PGY's P/E ratio is -3.27. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PGY's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is less volatile compared to PGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.
CSGS vs PAYA Comparison
CSGS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSGS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PAYA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSGS is priced at $65.80, while PAYA trades at $9.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSGS currently has a P/E ratio of 22.53, whereas PAYA's P/E ratio is 139.14. In terms of profitability, CSGS's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PAYA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CSGS is more volatile compared to PAYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSGS.