Salesforce, Inc.
Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CRM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRM | $252.20 | -4.76% | 247B | 40.44 | $6.39 | +0.63% |
| SAP | $283.49 | -2.41% | 334B | 44.47 | $6.45 | +0.91% |
| INTU | $777.55 | -3.70% | 219B | 63.99 | $12.27 | +0.52% |
| NOW | $920.03 | -5.88% | 196.2B | 119.12 | $7.92 | N/A |
| UBER | $86.66 | -1.12% | 183.6B | 15.37 | $5.71 | N/A |
| SHOP | $118.81 | -3.41% | 158.7B | 99.36 | $1.23 | N/A |
| APP | $381.79 | +5.09% | 132.2B | 70.65 | $5.53 | N/A |
| STRK | $106.50 | +1.85% | 118.1B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| MSTR | $380.58 | -3.66% | 113.9B | -18.07 | -$22.24 | N/A |
| CDNS | $356.32 | -3.97% | 99.5B | 98.52 | $3.70 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CRM vs SAP Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 334B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while SAP trades at $283.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 44.47. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check SAP's competition here
CRM vs INTU Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 219B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while INTU trades at $777.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 63.99. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check INTU's competition here
CRM vs NOW Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 196.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while NOW trades at $920.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 119.12. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check NOW's competition here
CRM vs UBER Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 183.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while UBER trades at $86.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 15.37. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is more volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check UBER's competition here
CRM vs SHOP Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 158.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while SHOP trades at $118.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 99.36. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check SHOP's competition here
CRM vs APP Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 132.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while APP trades at $381.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 70.65. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check APP's competition here
CRM vs STRK Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 118.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while STRK trades at $106.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check STRK's competition here
CRM vs MSTR Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 113.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while MSTR trades at $380.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -18.07. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check MSTR's competition here
CRM vs CDNS Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 99.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while CDNS trades at $356.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 98.52. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check CDNS's competition here
CRM vs SNOW Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 74.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while SNOW trades at $207.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is -53.23. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check SNOW's competition here
CRM vs ADSK Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 64.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while ADSK trades at $298.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 65.05. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check ADSK's competition here
CRM vs WDAY Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 61.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while WDAY trades at $225.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 126.73. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check WDAY's competition here
CRM vs TEAM Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 50.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while TEAM trades at $184.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is -116.94. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check TEAM's competition here
CRM vs DDOG Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 48.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while DDOG trades at $135.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 291.63. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check DDOG's competition here
CRM vs TTD Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, TTD has a market cap of 42.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while TTD trades at $84.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas TTD's P/E ratio is 106.05. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TTD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to TTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check TTD's competition here
CRM vs FICO Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 35B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while FICO trades at $1,381.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 61.86. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check FICO's competition here
CRM vs ANSS Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while ANSS trades at $374.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 55.53. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check ANSS's competition here
CRM vs STRF Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while STRF trades at $118.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check STRF's competition here
CRM vs HUBS Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while HUBS trades at $501.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is -1180.00. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HUBS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check HUBS's competition here
CRM vs PTC Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while PTC trades at $211.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 50.54. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check PTC's competition here
CRM vs TYL Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while TYL trades at $586.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 83.60. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check TYL's competition here
CRM vs ZM Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while ZM trades at $71.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 22.24. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check ZM's competition here
CRM vs SSNC Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while SSNC trades at $84.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 26.97. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check SSNC's competition here
CRM vs GRAB Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while GRAB trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 489.00. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check GRAB's competition here
CRM vs GWRE Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while GWRE trades at $223.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 526.09. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check GWRE's competition here
CRM vs BSY Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while BSY trades at $57.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 74.33. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check BSY's competition here
CRM vs AZPN Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while AZPN trades at $264.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AZPN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check AZPN's competition here
CRM vs DT Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while DT trades at $51.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 33.09. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check DT's competition here
CRM vs DUOL Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while DUOL trades at $336.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 169.88. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check DUOL's competition here
CRM vs DOCU Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while DOCU trades at $73.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check DOCU's competition here
CRM vs U Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, U has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while U trades at $31.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas U's P/E ratio is -29.79. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to U's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check U's competition here
CRM vs QXO Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, QXO has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while QXO trades at $19.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas QXO's P/E ratio is -57.29. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to QXO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to QXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check QXO's competition here
CRM vs PAYC Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while PAYC trades at $226.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 32.94. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check PAYC's competition here
CRM vs MNDY Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while MNDY trades at $250.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 264.94. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check MNDY's competition here
CRM vs MANH Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while MANH trades at $215.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 61.36. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check MANH's competition here
CRM vs BKI Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while BKI trades at $75.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check BKI's competition here
CRM vs XM Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while XM trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check XM's competition here
CRM vs CDAY Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while CDAY trades at $69.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CDAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check CDAY's competition here
CRM vs PCOR Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while PCOR trades at $64.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is -82.94. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check PCOR's competition here
CRM vs TTAN Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while TTAN trades at $114.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is -31.37. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check TTAN's competition here
CRM vs PCTY Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while PCTY trades at $181.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 45.99. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check PCTY's competition here
CRM vs PEGA Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while PEGA trades at $57.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 48.52. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check PEGA's competition here
CRM vs NICE Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while NICE trades at $154.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 21.76. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check NICE's competition here
CRM vs APPF Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while APPF trades at $313.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 49.79. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check APPF's competition here
CRM vs DAY Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while DAY trades at $55.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is 360.56. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check DAY's competition here
CRM vs SRAD Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while SRAD trades at $29.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 147.85. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check SRAD's competition here
CRM vs DSGX Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while DSGX trades at $104.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 64.10. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is more volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check DSGX's competition here
CRM vs ESTC Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while ESTC trades at $80.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is -80.46. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ESTC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check ESTC's competition here
CRM vs CVLT Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while CVLT trades at $181.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 105.61. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check CVLT's competition here
CRM vs NATI Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while NATI trades at $59.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check NATI's competition here
CRM vs SMAR Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while SMAR trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check SMAR's competition here
CRM vs OTEX Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while OTEX trades at $28.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 12.06. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check OTEX's competition here
CRM vs GTLB Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while GTLB trades at $41.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is 486.78. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GTLB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check GTLB's competition here
CRM vs BULL Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while BULL trades at $13.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is 11.44. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BULL's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check BULL's competition here
CRM vs IDCC Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while IDCC trades at $252.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 20.41. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check IDCC's competition here
CRM vs COUP Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while COUP trades at $80.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check COUP's competition here
CRM vs LIF Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while LIF trades at $75.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 589.15. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LIF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check LIF's competition here
CRM vs LYFT Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while LYFT trades at $13.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 93.73. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check LYFT's competition here
CRM vs CWAN Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while CWAN trades at $20.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is 11.92. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CWAN's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check CWAN's competition here
CRM vs VERX Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, VERX has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while VERX trades at $32.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas VERX's P/E ratio is -114.38. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VERX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to VERX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check VERX's competition here
CRM vs QTWO Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while QTWO trades at $78.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is -238.84. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to QTWO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check QTWO's competition here
CRM vs FROG Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while FROG trades at $42.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is -61.14. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check FROG's competition here
CRM vs RIOT Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, RIOT has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while RIOT trades at $11.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas RIOT's P/E ratio is -9.79. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RIOT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to RIOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check RIOT's competition here
CRM vs BILL Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while BILL trades at $42.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is -2142.50. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check BILL's competition here
CRM vs CVT Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while CVT trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check CVT's competition here
CRM vs SOUN Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, SOUN has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while SOUN trades at $10.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas SOUN's P/E ratio is -16.93. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SOUN's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to SOUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check SOUN's competition here
CRM vs COMP Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while COMP trades at $7.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is -61.12. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to COMP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check COMP's competition here
CRM vs PYCR Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while PYCR trades at $22.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check PYCR's competition here
CRM vs ETWO-WT Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, ETWO-WT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while ETWO-WT trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas ETWO-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ETWO-WT's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to ETWO-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check ETWO-WT's competition here
CRM vs PWSC Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while PWSC trades at $22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check PWSC's competition here
CRM vs FRSH Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, FRSH has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while FRSH trades at $12.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas FRSH's P/E ratio is -72.17. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FRSH's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to FRSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check FRSH's competition here
CRM vs CALX Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, CALX has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while CALX trades at $56.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas CALX's P/E ratio is -138.27. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CALX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to CALX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check CALX's competition here
CRM vs ZETA Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while ZETA trades at $15.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is -62.64. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check ZETA's competition here
CRM vs RUM Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while RUM trades at $8.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -5.78. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RUM's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to RUM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check RUM's competition here
CRM vs RUMBW Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, RUMBW has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while RUMBW trades at $2.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas RUMBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RUMBW's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to RUMBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check RUMBW's competition here
CRM vs WK Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while WK trades at $79.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas WK's P/E ratio is -55.05. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WK's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to WK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check WK's competition here
CRM vs AYX Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while AYX trades at $48.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check AYX's competition here
CRM vs ENV Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while ENV trades at $63.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check ENV's competition here
CRM vs INST Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while INST trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check INST's competition here
CRM vs ASAN Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, ASAN has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while ASAN trades at $14.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas ASAN's P/E ratio is -14.68. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ASAN's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to ASAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check ASAN's competition here
CRM vs GRND Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, GRND has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while GRND trades at $17.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas GRND's P/E ratio is -29.12. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GRND's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to GRND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check GRND's competition here
CRM vs ZI Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while ZI trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 116.88. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check ZI's competition here
CRM vs BL Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, BL has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while BL trades at $53.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas BL's P/E ratio is 38.97. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BL's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to BL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check BL's competition here
CRM vs BLKB Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, BLKB has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while BLKB trades at $65.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas BLKB's P/E ratio is -12.04. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BLKB's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to BLKB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check BLKB's competition here
CRM vs INTA Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, INTA has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while INTA trades at $39.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas INTA's P/E ratio is -166.87. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INTA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to INTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check INTA's competition here
CRM vs NCNO Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, NCNO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while NCNO trades at $27.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas NCNO's P/E ratio is -111.70. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NCNO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to NCNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check NCNO's competition here
CRM vs DAVEW Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, DAVEW has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while DAVEW trades at $1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas DAVEW's P/E ratio is -8.57. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DAVEW's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to DAVEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check DAVEW's competition here
CRM vs AGYS Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, AGYS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while AGYS trades at $114.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas AGYS's P/E ratio is 237.67. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AGYS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to AGYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check AGYS's competition here
CRM vs CLSK Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, CLSK has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while CLSK trades at $10.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas CLSK's P/E ratio is -10.24. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CLSK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to CLSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check CLSK's competition here
CRM vs DAVE Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while DAVE trades at $232.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 66.42. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check DAVE's competition here
CRM vs BRZE Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, BRZE has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while BRZE trades at $26.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas BRZE's P/E ratio is -27.60. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BRZE's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to BRZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check BRZE's competition here
CRM vs GBTG Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while GBTG trades at $6.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is -64.45. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GBTG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check GBTG's competition here
CRM vs ALIT Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, ALIT has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while ALIT trades at $5.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas ALIT's P/E ratio is -89.17. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALIT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to ALIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check ALIT's competition here
CRM vs ALRM Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, ALRM has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while ALRM trades at $54.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas ALRM's P/E ratio is 23.05. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALRM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is more volatile compared to ALRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check ALRM's competition here
CRM vs YOU Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, YOU has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while YOU trades at $28.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas YOU's P/E ratio is 18.17. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to YOU's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to YOU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check YOU's competition here
CRM vs BTDR Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, BTDR has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while BTDR trades at $12.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas BTDR's P/E ratio is -2.72. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BTDR's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to BTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check BTDR's competition here
CRM vs DCT Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, DCT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while DCT trades at $18.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas DCT's P/E ratio is -172.64. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DCT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is more volatile compared to DCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check DCT's competition here
CRM vs DV Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, DV has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while DV trades at $15.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas DV's P/E ratio is 52.84. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to DV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check DV's competition here
CRM vs PAR Comparison August 2025
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 247B. In comparison, PAR has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $252.20, while PAR trades at $59.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 40.44, whereas PAR's P/E ratio is -23.83. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PAR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to PAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.Check PAR's competition here