Salesforce, Inc.
Salesforce, Inc. CRM Peers
See (CRM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRM | $259.56 | -4.19% | 252.2B | 41.22 | $6.40 | +0.77% |
| SAP | $302.82 | -2.92% | 357.5B | 53.38 | $5.74 | +1.70% |
| INTU | $751.36 | -2.37% | 208.5B | 60.98 | $12.26 | +0.67% |
| UBER | $96.36 | -0.29% | 201.5B | 17.03 | $5.66 | N/A |
| NOW | $953.04 | -5.99% | 200.4B | 131.28 | $7.37 | N/A |
| SHOP | $113.51 | -0.71% | 149.3B | 94.41 | $1.22 | N/A |
| APP | $335.44 | -4.90% | 117.2B | 62.64 | $5.53 | N/A |
| MSTR | $433.86 | +4.44% | 115.3B | -18.97 | -$22.23 | N/A |
| CDNS | $323.67 | +0.24% | 88.1B | 81.70 | $3.95 | N/A |
| SNOW | $213.29 | -3.88% | 71.5B | -51.05 | -$4.20 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CRM vs SAP Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 357.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while SAP trades at $302.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 53.38. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs INTU Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 208.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while INTU trades at $751.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 60.98. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is more volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs UBER Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 201.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while UBER trades at $96.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 17.03. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is more volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs NOW Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 200.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while NOW trades at $953.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 131.28. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is more volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs SHOP Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 149.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while SHOP trades at $113.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 94.41. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs APP Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 117.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while APP trades at $335.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 62.64. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs MSTR Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 115.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while MSTR trades at $433.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -18.97. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs CDNS Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 88.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while CDNS trades at $323.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 81.70. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is more volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs SNOW Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 71.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while SNOW trades at $213.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is -51.05. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is more volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs WDAY Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 61.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while WDAY trades at $225.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 128.10. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is more volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs ADSK Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 61.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while ADSK trades at $282.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 61.54. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs TEAM Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 52.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while TEAM trades at $192.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is -121.24. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs DDOG Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 47.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while DDOG trades at $139.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 292.62. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs FICO Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 38.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while FICO trades at $1,560.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 68.32. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs TTD Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, TTD has a market cap of 37.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while TTD trades at $75.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas TTD's P/E ratio is 93.72. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TTD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to TTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs ANSS Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while ANSS trades at $377.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 55.71. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs STRK Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while STRK trades at $124.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs STRF Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while STRF trades at $122.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs HUBS Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 29.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while HUBS trades at $537.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is -1231.07. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HUBS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs TYL Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while TYL trades at $555.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 84.18. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs PTC Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while PTC trades at $196.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 53.46. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs ZM Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while ZM trades at $74.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 22.53. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs SSNC Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while SSNC trades at $82.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 25.96. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs GRAB Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while GRAB trades at $5.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 492.00. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs GWRE Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while GWRE trades at $222.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 548.54. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is more volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs DUOL Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while DUOL trades at $373.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 188.28. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs AZPN Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while AZPN trades at $264.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AZPN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs BSY Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while BSY trades at $56.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 72.67. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is more volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs DT Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while DT trades at $52.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 33.21. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs DOCU Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while DOCU trades at $74.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 14.52. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs MNDY Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while MNDY trades at $290.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 298.73. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs QXO Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, QXO has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while QXO trades at $21.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas QXO's P/E ratio is -61.17. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to QXO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to QXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs PAYC Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while PAYC trades at $225.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 32.59. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs MANH Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while MANH trades at $198.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 57.05. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is more volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs U Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, U has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while U trades at $29.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas U's P/E ratio is -26.03. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to U's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs BKI Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while BKI trades at $75.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs XM Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while XM trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs PCOR Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while PCOR trades at $72.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is -84.84. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs CDAY Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while CDAY trades at $69.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CDAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs NICE Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while NICE trades at $156.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 22.75. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs PCTY Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while PCTY trades at $181.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 45.62. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs TTAN Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while TTAN trades at $109.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is -29.80. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs DAY Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while DAY trades at $56.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is 364.06. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs SRAD Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while SRAD trades at $28.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 145.90. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs DSGX Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while DSGX trades at $101.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 63.28. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is more volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs ESTC Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while ESTC trades at $84.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is -81.41. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ESTC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs APPF Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while APPF trades at $238.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 45.70. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs PEGA Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while PEGA trades at $50.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 47.80. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs NATI Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while NATI trades at $59.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs SMAR Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while SMAR trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs OTEX Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while OTEX trades at $28.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 11.98. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs CVLT Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while CVLT trades at $167.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 100.66. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs GTLB Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while GTLB trades at $43.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is 500.78. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GTLB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs LYFT Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while LYFT trades at $15.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 102.13. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs CWAN Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while CWAN trades at $21.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is 13.09. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CWAN's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs COUP Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while COUP trades at $80.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs IDCC Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while IDCC trades at $228.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 18.12. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs BULL Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while BULL trades at $12.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is 10.33. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BULL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs QTWO Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while QTWO trades at $90.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is -272.44. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to QTWO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is more volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs VERX Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, VERX has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while VERX trades at $35.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas VERX's P/E ratio is -123.59. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VERX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to VERX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs SOUN Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, SOUN has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while SOUN trades at $12.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas SOUN's P/E ratio is -20.16. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SOUN's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to SOUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs LIF Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while LIF trades at $64.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 494.46. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LIF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is more volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs BILL Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while BILL trades at $45.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is -2319.50. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs FROG Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while FROG trades at $40.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is -57.07. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs RIOT Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, RIOT has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while RIOT trades at $12.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas RIOT's P/E ratio is -9.19. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RIOT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to RIOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs FRSH Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, FRSH has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while FRSH trades at $14.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas FRSH's P/E ratio is -61.38. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FRSH's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to FRSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs DAVEW Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, DAVEW has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while DAVEW trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas DAVEW's P/E ratio is -7.72. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DAVEW's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to DAVEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs ETWO-WT Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, ETWO-WT has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while ETWO-WT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas ETWO-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ETWO-WT's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is more volatile compared to ETWO-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs RUMBW Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, RUMBW has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while RUMBW trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas RUMBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RUMBW's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to RUMBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs CVT Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while CVT trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs GRND Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, GRND has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while GRND trades at $21.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas GRND's P/E ratio is -35.48. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GRND's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to GRND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs PYCR Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while PYCR trades at $22.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs RUM Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while RUM trades at $9.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -6.37. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RUM's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to RUM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs WK Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while WK trades at $69.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas WK's P/E ratio is -60.41. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WK's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to WK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs PWSC Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while PWSC trades at $22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs INTA Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, INTA has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while INTA trades at $45.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas INTA's P/E ratio is -195.63. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INTA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to INTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs ZI Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while ZI trades at $10.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 85.92. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs CLSK Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, CLSK has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while CLSK trades at $12.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas CLSK's P/E ratio is -11.63. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CLSK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to CLSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs AYX Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while AYX trades at $48.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs COMP Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while COMP trades at $6.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is -51.92. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to COMP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs ZETA Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while ZETA trades at $14.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is -59.72. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs ENV Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while ENV trades at $63.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs BL Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, BL has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while BL trades at $54.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas BL's P/E ratio is 40.60. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BL's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to BL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs INST Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while INST trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs ASAN Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, ASAN has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while ASAN trades at $14.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas ASAN's P/E ratio is -14.42. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ASAN's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to ASAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs NCNO Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, NCNO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while NCNO trades at $28.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas NCNO's P/E ratio is -115.44. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NCNO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to NCNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs CALX Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, CALX has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while CALX trades at $50.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas CALX's P/E ratio is -98.13. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CALX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is more volatile compared to CALX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs AGYS Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, AGYS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while AGYS trades at $113.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas AGYS's P/E ratio is 140.57. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AGYS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to AGYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs BLKB Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, BLKB has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while BLKB trades at $64.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas BLKB's P/E ratio is -11.76. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BLKB's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to BLKB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs GBTG Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while GBTG trades at $6.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is -66.00. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GBTG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is more volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs ALIT Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, ALIT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while ALIT trades at $5.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas ALIT's P/E ratio is -98.83. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALIT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to ALIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs KC Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, KC has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while KC trades at $11.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas KC's P/E ratio is -10.56. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KC's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to KC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs ALKT Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, ALKT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while ALKT trades at $29.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas ALKT's P/E ratio is -81.62. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALKT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to ALKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs BRZE Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, BRZE has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while BRZE trades at $26.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas BRZE's P/E ratio is -27.62. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BRZE's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to BRZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs DAVE Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while DAVE trades at $220.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 64.66. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs PAR Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, PAR has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while PAR trades at $69.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas PAR's P/E ratio is -27.29. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PAR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is more volatile compared to PAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs ALRM Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, ALRM has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while ALRM trades at $55.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas ALRM's P/E ratio is 23.58. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALRM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to ALRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs YOU Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, YOU has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while YOU trades at $28.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas YOU's P/E ratio is 17.96. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to YOU's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to YOU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.
CRM vs BTDR Comparison
CRM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRM stands at 252.2B. In comparison, BTDR has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRM is priced at $259.56, while BTDR trades at $13.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRM currently has a P/E ratio of 41.22, whereas BTDR's P/E ratio is -2.78. In terms of profitability, CRM's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BTDR's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CRM is less volatile compared to BTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRM.